Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi)

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/29/2019

A nova S-Class. O Galaxy Tab S5e se parece muito com o Galaxy Tab S4. No entanto, enquanto o último é atualmente o principal tablet da Samsung, o Tab S5e é significativamente mais barato por quase 400 Euros (~$448). O tablet de gama média também é 20% mais leve. A Samsung não reduziu o hardware para economizar custos, o que poderia tornar o Tab S5e uma escolha melhor para algumas pessoas do que seu irmão mais caro.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Pantalha
10.5 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 288 PPI, Tela táctil multitouch de 10 pontos, Super AMOLED, WQXGA, brilho adaptativo, Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.2 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de digitais, giroscópio, sensor hall, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, ANT +, porta docking (Samsung Pogo Pins), Samsung DeX
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.5 x 245 x 160
Bateria
7040 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.4", f/2.0, 8x digital zoom, fotos de até 4128x3096 (4:3), vídeos de até 3840 x 2160/30 FPS (UHD)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4.0", f/2.0, wide angle, fotos de até 3265x2448 (4:3), vídeos de até 1920 x 1080/30 FPS (Full HD)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes AKG com Dolby Atmos, Teclado: virtual, Carregador Modular (9 V/1.67 A, 5 V/2 A), cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, adaptador para conector de 3,5 mm (USB Type-C), ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, One UI 1.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
400 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 456 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g245 mm 160 mm 5.5 mm 400 g242 mm 167 mm 7 mm 440 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
540 (min: 499, max: 581) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (min: 329, max: 362) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼54% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼45% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼40% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
214 (min: 206, max: 223) MBit/s ∼40% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
553 (min: 481, max: 580) MBit/s ∼95% +91%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (min: 314, max: 338) MBit/s ∼56% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
289 (min: 229, max: 300) MBit/s ∼50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼41% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼39% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (329-362)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (229-300)
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Loop
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
435
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 481 cd/m² Médio: 453.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 452 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad Air 2019
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Lenovo Tab P10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Screen
-69%
-2%
-34%
-131%
-14%
Brightness middle
452
426
-6%
515
14%
382
-15%
522
15%
474
5%
Brightness
453
399
-12%
483
7%
378
-17%
495
9%
477
5%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
90
0%
92
2%
84
-7%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.41
0.24
0.41
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.5
-165%
1.6
6%
2.8
-65%
6.7
-294%
2.5
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.7
7.9
-114%
4.4
-19%
6
-62%
12.2
-230%
5.8
-57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.2
-117%
2.8
-17%
3.5
-46%
9.1
-279%
2.1
12%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.33 94%
2.14 103%
2.08 106%
CCT
6337 103%
6875 95%
6944 94%
6903 94%
9417 69%
6281 103%
Contrast
1121
1256
1592
1273

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼26% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points ∼18% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)
6348 Points ∼14% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6090 Points ∼14%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=38)
6015 Points ∼14% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
3261 Points ∼7% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -74%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
11490 Points ∼26% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼15% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5742 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)
5359 Points ∼12% -7%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=55)
4639 Points ∼11% -19%
Lenovo Tab P10
3705 Points ∼8% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼8% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
4758 Points ∼75% +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1712 Points ∼27%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=55)
1653 Points ∼26% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)
1651 Points ∼26% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼26% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -30%
Lenovo Tab P10
747 Points ∼12% -56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6698 - 7387, n=3)
7154 Points ∼60% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6698 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points ∼53% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼43% -24%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6698, n=39)
4281 Points ∼36% -36%
Lenovo Tab P10
4250 Points ∼36% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼31% -45%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8126 - 9458, n=3)
8994 Points ∼46% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8126 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points ∼35% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼26% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
4949 Points ∼25% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼25% -40%
Average of class Tablet (4342 - 8356, n=80)
4594 Points ∼23% -43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼15% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2288 Points ∼15%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 2288, n=5)
868 Points ∼6% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1408 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1408, n=5)
404 Points ∼3% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1540 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1540, n=5)
453 Points ∼3% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3347 Points ∼74% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points ∼64% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=3)
2573 Points ∼57% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2424 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2323 Points ∼51% -4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼40% -26%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3347, n=43)
1600 Points ∼35% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼31% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
6484 Points ∼79% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points ∼50% +153%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2069 Points ∼25% +28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 6993, n=43)
1631 Points ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1612 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=3)
1612 Points ∼20% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -67%
Lenovo Tab P10
414 Points ∼5% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
5367 Points ∼85% +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼59% +115%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2121 Points ∼34% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=3)
1756 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1742 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5367, n=44)
1397 Points ∼22% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼10% -65%
Lenovo Tab P10
499 Points ∼8% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3493 Points ∼74% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼63% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=3)
2560 Points ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2413 Points ∼51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2101 Points ∼45% -13%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=48)
1643 Points ∼35% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15399 Points ∼54% +508%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼13% +45%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=48)
3099 Points ∼11% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2537, n=3)
2535 Points ∼9% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2534 Points ∼9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2208 Points ∼8% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -70%
Lenovo Tab P10
711 Points ∼2% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
8763 Points ∼65% +250%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼28% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=3)
2539 Points ∼19% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2506 Points ∼19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2183 Points ∼16% -13%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=48)
2050 Points ∼15% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
821 Points ∼6% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3312 Points ∼77% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼68% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=3)
2543 Points ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2436 Points ∼56%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼56% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
1832 Points ∼42% -25%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3312, n=62)
1474 Points ∼34% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
5760 Points ∼91% +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼58% +154%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼24% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=3)
1473 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1451 Points ∼23%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5760, n=62)
1193 Points ∼19% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6% -72%
Lenovo Tab P10
364 Points ∼6% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Air 2019
4949 Points ∼86% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼61% +119%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼29% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=3)
1625 Points ∼28% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1594 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 4949, n=68)
1052 Points ∼18% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼9% -69%
Lenovo Tab P10
443 Points ∼8% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3180 Points ∼71% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼66% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=3)
2551 Points ∼57% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2456 Points ∼55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼55% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
1814 Points ∼41% -26%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3184, n=64)
1443 Points ∼32% -41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼30% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
10647 Points ∼100% +352%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼35% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=3)
2401 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2357 Points ∼22%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=64)
1731 Points ∼16% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼16% -27%
Lenovo Tab P10
691 Points ∼6% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼6% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Air 2019
6997 Points ∼89% +194%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼45% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=3)
2432 Points ∼31% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2378 Points ∼30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼24% -23%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=68)
1359 Points ∼17% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
801 Points ∼10% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼9% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
27663 Points ∼32% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼22% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=3)
15403 Points ∼18% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% +13%
Lenovo Tab P10
14108 Points ∼16% +8%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=152)
13331 Points ∼15% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13055 Points ∼15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
160399 Points ∼30% +617%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11% +152%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35596, n=3)
31126 Points ∼6% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
22381 Points ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=152)
20201 Points ∼4% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
12400 Points ∼2% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
77626 Points ∼33% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼17% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=3)
25181 Points ∼11% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19315 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=153)
15950 Points ∼7% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -32%
Lenovo Tab P10
12743 Points ∼5% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
261 fps ∼2% +467%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼1% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼1% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=3)
54 fps ∼0% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
46 fps ∼0%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=178)
32 fps ∼0% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -52%
Lenovo Tab P10
21 fps ∼0% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
59.9 fps ∼2% +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼2% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=3)
45.7 fps ∼1% +43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼1% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
32 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -34%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=182)
21 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
20 fps ∼1% -37%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
139 fps ∼25% +379%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼11% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
29 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=3)
29 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=116)
21 fps ∼4% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
9.2 fps ∼2% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
58.5 fps ∼16% +244%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼10% +112%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=3)
24 fps ∼7% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
17 fps ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=119)
14.7 fps ∼4% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -44%
Lenovo Tab P10
8.7 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
96 fps ∼2% +405%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps ∼1% +116%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=65)
19.9 fps ∼0% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼0% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼0% -5%
Lenovo Tab P10
6 fps ∼0% -68%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
51.2 fps ∼1% +642%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps ∼1% +219%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=3)
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=65)
12.5 fps ∼0% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.9 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab P10
5.7 fps ∼0% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -32%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.4 fps ∼17% +514%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 49, n=15)
10.5 fps ∼7% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
8.9 fps ∼6% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼3% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.3 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.9 fps ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.3 fps ∼24% +498%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 51.1, n=15)
11.7 fps ∼11% +166%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
9.3 fps ∼8% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 7, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.1 fps ∼1% -75%
Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
40.4 fps ∼20% +494%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 58, n=15)
15.1 fps ∼8% +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14 fps ∼7% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=3)
9.6 fps ∼5% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.8 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.2 fps ∼2% -53%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
70.5 fps ∼28% +488%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 134, n=15)
31.3 fps ∼12% +161%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼10% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -72%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
62.8 fps ∼16% +639%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼6% +194%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5% +112%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 107, n=44)
13.4 fps ∼3% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼3% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8.5 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
35.8 fps ∼21% +459%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps ∼8% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼6% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=3)
9.13 fps ∼5% +43%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 47, n=44)
7.71 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.3 fps ∼2% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -69%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
21.79 (min: 12.48, max: 36) fps ∼23% +66%
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=3)
14.5 fps ∼16% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)
13.4 fps ∼14% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13.1 fps ∼14%
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14.78 (min: 9.16, max: 37.68) fps ∼41% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼27% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7.67 fps ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=3)
7.48 fps ∼21% -2%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22.71 (min: 13.73, max: 55.41) fps ∼16% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12.04 fps ∼9%
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=3)
11.6 fps ∼8% -4%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
370545 Points ∼65% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
156772 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)
156363 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 566378, n=31)
147105 Points ∼26% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼20% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -50%
Lenovo Tab P10
71739 Points ∼13% -54%
VRMark - Amber Room
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3130 Score ∼62% +120%
Average of class Tablet (1423 - 3130, n=2)
2277 Score ∼45% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2)
1448 Score ∼29% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1423 Score ∼28%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Air 2019
1734 Points ∼85% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points ∼60% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=3)
1186 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1144 Points ∼56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼40% -29%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=109)
753 Points ∼37% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
734 Points ∼36% -36%
Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15614 Points ∼54% +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points ∼21% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2816 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2815 - 2818, n=3)
2816 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=109)
2249 Points ∼8% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼6% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
951 Points ∼3% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -70%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2894 - 3316, n=3)
3166 Points ∼42% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2894 Points ∼39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼35% -8%
Apple iPad Air 2019
2095 Points ∼28% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼20% -48%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=109)
1072 Points ∼14% -63%
Lenovo Tab P10
853 Points ∼11% -71%
System
Apple iPad Air 2019
12591 Points ∼76% +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points ∼34% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5315 - 5507, n=3)
5434 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5315 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Tab P10
2861 Points ∼17% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼17% -47%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=109)
2463 Points ∼15% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -56%
Overall
Apple iPad Air 2019
5169 Points ∼61% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points ∼39% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2653 - 2811, n=3)
2753 Points ∼33% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2653 Points ∼31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼21% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -51%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=109)
1278 Points ∼15% -52%
Lenovo Tab P10
1142 Points ∼14% -57%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
2873 Points ∼54% +547%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5300, n=17)
1526 Points ∼29% +244%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2)
446 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
444 Points ∼8%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2019 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
109.573 Points ∼100% +226%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 110, n=6)
45.9 Points ∼42% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.6 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=3)
33.1 Points ∼30% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
156 Points ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
77 Points ∼49% +17%
Average of class Tablet (23 - 182, n=20)
73.7 Points ∼47% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
66 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (62 - 66, n=2)
64 Points ∼41% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
123 runs/min ∼100% +265%
Average of class Tablet (11.1 - 132, n=10)
58.9 runs/min ∼48% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.74 runs/min ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.5 - 33.7, n=2)
33.1 runs/min ∼27% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
41770 Points ∼100% +269%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points ∼31% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
11312 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10844 - 11312, n=3)
11071 Points ∼27% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼21% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼16% -40%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=170)
6729 Points ∼16% -41%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
4075 Points ∼10% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
11352 ms * ∼100% -225%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=181)
9243 ms * ∼81% -164%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼52% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼35% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
3496.3 ms * ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3589, n=3)
3482 ms * ∼31% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2644.7 ms * ∼23% +24%
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
643.5 ms * ∼6% +82%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Lenovo Tab P10Samsung Galaxy Tab S4Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
29%
-7%
44%
-6%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
59.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-7%
44.9 (14.6 - 73.8, n=53)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-27%
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
80.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-2%
62.4 (21.2 - 87.7, n=53)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
18.79
9.37
-50%
60.8
224%
15.75
-16%
24.43
30%
24.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=111)
28%
5.82 (0.13 - 77.9, n=204)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
79.19
27.72
-65%
54.7
-31%
53.9
-32%
141.96
79%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=111)
-31%
18.7 (1.32 - 142, n=204)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
197.05
147.67
-25%
126.8
-36%
205.74
4%
195.76
-1%
171 (40 - 246, n=111)
-13%
38.8 (2.04 - 208, n=204)
-80%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.35
262.2
-11%
247.8
-16%
276.7
-6%
740.54
152%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=111)
-8%
110 (6.75 - 741, n=204)
-63%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø29.5 (7-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø60.1 (49-61)
Shadow Fight 3
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø59.6 (2-61)
Carga Máxima
 32.6 °C29 °C28.1 °C 
 33.1 °C28.8 °C28 °C 
 31.8 °C30.7 °C29.6 °C 
Máximo: 33.1 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
27.9 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
27.6 °C28.4 °C30.4 °C
27.7 °C28.8 °C31.2 °C
Máximo: 31.2 °C
Médio: 29 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the front of the device under load
Heat map of the rear of the device under load
Heat map of the rear of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.143.32527.434.43125.525.54024.527.45036.136.56326.127.88024.333.610022.14212519.145.616020.25820019.460.225016.560.331515.168.140015.366.95001471.163014.570.78001473.8100014.573.6125014.572.7160014.374200014.673.225001470315014.765.5400014.365.4500014.870.4630014.671.2800014.470.81000014.671.41250014.764.9160001552.9SPL26.783.3N0.860.4median 14.6median 70Delta1.55.428.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.07 / 3.94 / 3.96 Watt
Carga midlight 4.07 / 5.73 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-26%
-60%
-56%
-3%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
2.07
1.55
25%
2.18
-5%
2.01
3%
1.01
51%
1.76
15%
Idle Average *
3.94
4.17
-6%
6.4
-62%
5.4
-37%
4.16
-6%
4.22
-7%
Idle Maximum *
3.96
4.25
-7%
6.43
-62%
5.44
-37%
4.17
-5%
4.25
-7%
Load Average *
4.07
7.13
-75%
7.48
-84%
8.55
-110%
5.45
-34%
4.52
-11%
Load Maximum *
5.73
9.63
-68%
10.65
-86%
11.53
-101%
6.9
-20%
7.35
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 00min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
-3%
-11%
16%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1263
960
-24%
1501
19%
1344
6%
1315
4%
1227
-3%
H.264
864
585
-32%
684
-21%
702
-19%
910
5%
735
-15%
WiFi v1.3
623
542
-13%
738
18%
648
4%
992
59%
495
-21%
Load
300
274
-9%
214
-29%
196
-35%
289
-4%
245
-18%

Pro

+ Design plano e rígido
+ Comparativamente leve para um tablet de 10,5 polegadas
+ Suporta DeX da Samsung
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Tela Super AMOLED impressionante
+ Desempenho sólido do SoC
+ Jogos modernos rodam perfeitamente
+ Quatro alto-falantes
+ Suporte para Dolby Atmos
+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem certificação IP
- Sem NFC
- Câmeras médias
- PWM cintilante da tela
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tablet review. Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tablet review. Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e é um tablet sólido e versátil. O dispositivo possui uma tela Super AMOLED de 10,5 polegadas, brilhante e rica em contraste, e um SoC capaz de suportar até os mais complexos jogos modernos. Da mesma forma, seus alto-falantes proporcionam uma experiência imersiva nos jogos, enquanto a duração da bateria não faltará durante longas sessões de jogos ou filmes.

O tablet também é bem construído e leve, o que nem sempre é o caso dos tablets de tamanho médio. O design de metal e os marcos finos da tela fazem com que pareça mais caro do que é. Além disso, a inclusão do suporte ao DeX e a capa de teclado opcional tornam o Tab S5e mais do que apenas um tablet multimídia.

Existem alguns pontos fracos, mas estes são poucos e distantes entre si. A Samsung equipou o tablet com câmeras comuns, enquanto a omissão de um chip NFC é decepcionante. Também recomendamos experimentar o Tab S5e em pessoa, se você for sensível ao PWM, pois a tela pisca em uma frequência que pode causar cansaço visual e dores de cabeça durante o uso prolongado.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e é uma alternativa valiosa para tablets mais caros, como o Tab S4 e iPad Air (2019). Ele oferece praticamente tudo o que a maioria das pessoas desejaria de um tablet, mas a um preço mais acessível e sem muitos compromissos.

No geral, o Tab S5e não é apenas um dos tablets de melhor valor que você pode comprar atualmente, mas também dá uma boa batalha aos tablets mais poderosos. O Tab S4, no geral, continua a ser um melhor tablet multimídia, por causa de seu SoC mais poderoso, RAM de alta capacidade e armazenamento interno mais rápido. A inclusão do suporte para a caneta também ajuda o Tab S4.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 - 05/22/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
75 / 80 → 93%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
52 / 65 → 79%
Peso
85 / 40-88 → 93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 68 → 82%
Desempenho da aplicação
65 / 76 → 85%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Médio
78%
89%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi)
Manuel Masiero, 2019-05-29 (Update: 2019-05-29)