Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone SE

Anão poderoso. As versões mais econômicas do iPhone não foram um sucesso de verdade até agora. Isto poderia mudar com o iPhone SE, porque é muito veloz, duradouro e preenche um nicho com a sua tela de 4-polegadas.
Florian Wimmer, Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
pesquisar relação.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Apple iPhone SE (iPhone Serie)
Processador
Apple A9 2 x 1.85 GHz, Cyclone 3
Placa gráfica
Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Análises do: 450 MHz
Memória
2048 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
4.00 polegadas 16:9, 1136 x 640 pixel 326 PPI, 10-dedos, IPS, Retina, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Fingerabdruck 1. Generation Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de luz, Sensor de proximidade, Bússola, Leitor de digitais, Porta Lightning, NFC apenas para Apple Pay
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B29); LTE Advanced 150/50 Mbit/s; SAR-value: 0,72 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 123.8 x 58.6
Bateria
6.21 Wh, 1624 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 9
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix F/2.2, AF, vídeo 2160p
Secondary Camera: 1.2 MPix F/2.4, vídeo 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo para conector Lightning, Fones, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
Released
03/31/2016
peso
113 g, Suprimento de energia: 47 g
Preço
489 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 143 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g127 mm 65 mm 8.9 mm 138 g124.4 mm 59.2 mm 8.97 mm 132 g123.8 mm 58.6 mm 7.6 mm 113 g
GPS Garmin Edge Overview
GPS Garmin Edge Overview
GPS Garmin Edge City
GPS Garmin Edge City
GPS Garmin Edge Highway
GPS Garmin Edge Highway
GPS Apple iPhone SE Overview
GPS Apple iPhone SE Overview
GPS Apple iPhone SE City
GPS Apple iPhone SE City
GPS Apple iPhone SE Highway
GPS Apple iPhone SE Highway

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
562
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 603 cd/m² Médio: 579.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 603 cd/m²
Contraste: 685:1 (Preto: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.13% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 5c
SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash
Screen
-3%
-6%
2%
-1%
-63%
-6%
Brightness middle
603
552
-8%
583
-3%
386
-36%
350
-42%
547
-9%
572
-5%
Brightness
579
549
-5%
560
-3%
394
-32%
351
-39%
532
-8%
537
-7%
Brightness Distribution
93
87
-6%
91
-2%
88
-5%
98
5%
94
1%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.88
0.39
56%
0.46
48%
0.54
39%
0.66
25%
Contrast
685
1415
107%
1267
85%
1013
48%
867
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.4
-89%
3.55
-97%
1.11
38%
2.04
-13%
7.37
-309%
2.64
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
3.35
4%
3.25
7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
4.16
-81%
3.88
-69%
1.34
42%
1.63
29%
8.39
-265%
2.97
-29%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.2 100%
2.12 104%
2.07 106%
2.28 96%
2.48 89%
CCT
6955 93%
7288 89%
7280 89%
6441 101%
6391 102%
9074 72%
7170 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.13
62.18
0%
59.05
-5%
86.86
40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.74
95.93
-1%
92.8
-4%
99.35
3%
99.9865
3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14793 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
1943 Points ∼4%
Apple iPhone 6S
1987 Points ∼4% +2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1972 Points ∼4% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2094 Points ∼5% +8%
Apple iPhone 5c
1759 Points ∼4% -9%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
5445 Points ∼5%
Apple iPhone 6S
5442 Points ∼5% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4818 Points ∼5% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6055 Points ∼6% +11%
Apple iPhone 5c
1162 Points ∼1% -79%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
14016 Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 6S
19060 Points ∼0% +36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
18062 Points ∼0% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S7
5590 Points ∼0% -60%
Apple iPhone 5c
3181 Points ∼0% -77%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
39987 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone 6S
95049 Points ∼48% +138%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
96768 Points ∼49% +142%
Samsung Galaxy S7
35808 Points ∼18% -10%
Apple iPhone 5c
12892 Points ∼6% -68%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
49934 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 6S
49848 Points ∼7% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
47850 Points ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
207417 Points ∼27% +315%
Apple iPhone 5c
24996 Points ∼3% -50%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
7860 Points ∼24%
Apple iPhone 6S
8296 Points ∼25% +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
7975 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
7730 Points ∼23% -2%
Apple iPhone 5c
3459 Points ∼10% -56%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
4078 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2201 Points ∼3%
Apple iPhone 5c
1273 Points ∼2%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1375 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
703 Points ∼14%
Apple iPhone 5c
710 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
4386 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 6S
4422 Points ∼7% +1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points ∼10% +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
2533 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone 6S
2539 Points ∼52% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼52% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points ∼45% -13%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone SE
126969 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points ∼46% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points ∼12% -72%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼44% +1%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone SE Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 5c Apple A6, PowerVR SGX543MP3, 16 GB iNAND Flash
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone SE
3149 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼82% -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1878 Points ∼57% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points ∼8% -91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone SE
4255 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼66% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
2353 Points ∼52% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points ∼5% -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼100% +22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼84% +3%
Apple iPhone SE
1649 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1100 Points ∼55% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points ∼46% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone SE
2298 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1198 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone SE
2524 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼85% -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1137 Points ∼44% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼100% +16%
Apple iPhone SE
1749 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points ∼83% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1472 Points ∼73% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE
29538 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S
28419 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
26420 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE
44059 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S
42686 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
37319 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points ∼15% -85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼100% +45%
Apple iPhone SE
13717 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 6S
13097 Points ∼66% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
13065 Points ∼66% -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points ∼64% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points ∼58% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE
58.1 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S
56 fps ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
45 fps ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps ∼14% -86%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE
40 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S
39.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
25 fps ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps ∼10% -90%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPhone SE
59.2 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S
59.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
57 fps ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps ∼34% -66%
Apple iPhone 5c
13 fps ∼22% -78%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone SE
80.3 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone 6S
79.6 fps ∼95% -1%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼94% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
56 fps ∼67% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps ∼14% -85%
Apple iPhone 5c
6.8 fps ∼8% -92%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
118.76 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
118.7 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S
118.6 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
49 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points ∼19% -81%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE
16550 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 6S
16200 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
15967 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
5691 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points ∼22% -78%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 5c
14535.3 ms * ∼100% -751%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796.2 ms * ∼81% -590%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
4210.4 ms * ∼29% -146%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2561.5 ms * ∼18% -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1743 ms * ∼12% -2%
Apple iPhone 6S
1715 ms * ∼12% -0%
Apple iPhone SE
1708.9 ms * ∼12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
190 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 6S
187 Points ∼98% +1%
Apple iPhone SE
186 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼87% -11%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
104 Points ∼55% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points ∼34% -66%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 44.2 °C42.6 °C39.1 °C 
 42 °C40.1 °C38.2 °C 
 39.8 °C38.5 °C37.2 °C 
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C
40.3 °C42.7 °C42.8 °C
39.5 °C41.1 °C40.5 °C
39.2 °C40.3 °C39 °C
Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.54 / 1.26 / 1.4 Watt
Carga midlight 2.45 / 6.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 5S
PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Apple iPhone 5c
SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Power Consumption
12%
-6%
23%
-38%
-11%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
0.54
0.6
-11%
0.5
7%
0.4
26%
0.6
-11%
0.96
-78%
0.68
-26%
Idle Average *
1.26
0.8
37%
1.6
-27%
1
21%
1.4
-11%
1.39
-10%
1.02
19%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.6
-14%
1.9
-36%
1.3
7%
1.7
-21%
1.45
-4%
1.14
19%
Load Average *
2.45
2.3
6%
2.5
-2%
2.2
10%
5.3
-116%
2.65
-8%
4.73
-93%
Load Maximum *
6.46
3.8
41%
4.8
26%
3.3
49%
8.4
-30%
3.51
46%
7.16
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 27min
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Apple iPhone 5c
SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Battery Runtime
-13%
-1%
-16%
7%
36%
11%
Reader / Idle
1274
1510
19%
1655
30%
1130
-11%
2249
77%
1978
55%
1810
42%
H.264
759
699
-8%
714
-6%
525
-31%
863
14%
892
18%
WiFi v1.3
673
492
-27%
513
-24%
440
-35%
628
-7%
456
-32%
Load
207
137
-34%
197
-5%
165
-20%
242
17%
376
82%
242
17%
WiFi
862

Pro

+ Chassi sofisticado
+ Compacto e leve
+ Desempenho muito alto
+ Tela brilhante com cores precisas
+ Operação responsiva e fluente
+ Muitos acessórios disponíveis
+ Ótima qualidade do sinal
+ GPS preciso
+ Bom alto falante
+ Boas câmeras
+ Ótimas durações na prática

Contra

- Alto valor de preto
- NFC apenas para Apple Pay
- Microfone com som abafado
- Sem certificação IP
- As superfícies de vidro podem se quebrar com facilidade
- Armazenamento não expansível
- Bateria integrada
In review: iPhone SE. Test model courtesy of Apple Germany.
In review: iPhone SE. Test model courtesy of Apple Germany.

A Apple ainda adora construir smartphones compactos, embora as últimas gerações tenham crescido de forma considerável. O iPhone SE (que é a abreviatura para Special Edition) volta para as raízes e revive o formato de 4-polegadas, raramente usado hoje em dia. Não apenas as crianças ficarão contentes com isto, mas todo os usuários que preferem este tamanho e não tiveram muitas opções até agora.

O iPhone SE é similar ao iPhone 6S em muitos aspectos e também ultrapassa o iPhone 6 ou 6 Plus, que ainda estão disponíveis, em termos de desempenho, gravações em 4K e as durações da bateria, por exemplo. A estamina inclusive derrota o iPhone 6S e está no mesmo nível com o iPhone 6S Plus. Módulos de comunicação velozes, a boa tela, boas câmeras e bom software são outras vantagens do iPhone SE. 

Se estiver procurando um smartphone compacto sem sacrificar desempenho, o iPhone SE será uma ótima opção. O aparelho, é, no entanto, provavelmente muito caro e frágil para usuários conscientes de preços e fanáticos dos exteriores.

Os fanáticos dos exteriores ainda terão problemas coma superfície suscetível a arranhões, o vidro que pode se quebrar facilmente e a ausência da certificação IP. Há muitos acessórios na internet para estes propósitos, mas o iPhone SE é – similar a seus predecessores – mais um bonito aparelho para interiores que uma ferramenta para aventuras. Você ainda não pode expandir o armazenamento ou substituir a bateria.

Se você não gosta da Apple, o iPhone SE não o convencerá, mas todos os outros usuários, mais uma vez, obterão um aparelho bonito e poderoso com uma carcaça compacta e leve.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Apple iPhone SE - 09/27/2019 v7
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
59 / 75 → 78%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
41 / 70 → 59%
Peso
95%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
21 / 64 → 33%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 86 → 62%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
52%
Médio
72%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1285 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone SE
Florian Wimmer, 2016-05- 6 (Update: 2016-05- 9)