Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ1

Inge Schwabe (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/09/2017

Assuntos de família. O XZ1 é o sucessor do Sony XZ, o smartphone de gama alta inicial da Sony. Como tal, parece ter herdado o viés do último por incorporar algumas falhas. No entanto, o XZ1 é realmente um membro do time de gama alta.

Sony Xperia XZ1 (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela capacitiva multitouch de 10 pontos, IPS, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Leitor de digitais (na lateral), acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, barômetro, bússola, espectro de cores
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900), HSPA+ (800, 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100), LTE (700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,700, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600) CAT16, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 148 x 73.4
Bateria
13.5 Wh, 2700 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qualcomm QuickCharge 3.0
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix 1/2.3" sensor, EIS (gyro), LED, [email protected], [email protected]/60fps, [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 22 mm, 1/3" sensor, 1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes frontais estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Sony Xperia UI, 24 Meses Garantia, resistente à água e á poeira (IP65/68), USB 3.1, Type-C 1.0, OTG, Miracast, DLNA, Wifi Direct, SAR: 0.8 W/kg, fanless
peso
156 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
699 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +87%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼54%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼41% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼36% -33%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼36% -34%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼34% -37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼77%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼57% -25%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼53% -31%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -56%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Sony Xperia XZ1
Sony Xperia XZ1
Sony Xperia XZ1
main camera with manual focus
main camera with manual focus
secondary camera, colors cooler, higher brightness
secondary camera, colors cooler, higher brightness
secondary camera with no modifications
secondary camera with no modifications
secondary camera, colors warmer
secondary camera, colors warmer

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
612
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 633 cd/m² Médio: 610.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.05 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 620 cd/m²
Contraste: 785:1 (Preto: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.02
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Screen
-10%
18%
-0%
36%
28%
Brightness middle
620
566
-9%
550
-11%
547
-12%
559
-10%
646
4%
Brightness
610
560
-8%
535
-12%
556
-9%
538
-12%
611
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
92
-1%
86
-8%
90
-3%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.79
0.53
33%
0.42
47%
0.43
46%
0.38
52%
0.23
71%
Contrast
785
1068
36%
1310
67%
1272
62%
1471
87%
2809
258%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.6
-10%
3.3
21%
4.8
-14%
1.3
69%
4.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.8
9.4
-62%
4.5
22%
8.8
-52%
2.7
53%
8.3
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
6.5
-67%
3.6
8%
4.5
-15%
1.8
54%
6
-54%
Gamma
2.02 119%
2.14 112%
2.38 101%
2.39 100%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
CCT
7086 92%
8189 79%
7226 90%
7194 90%
6797 96%
7996 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 24 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points ∼75% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
150208 Points ∼65% -10%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼76% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points ∼79% +8%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼77% +6%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% +4%
Google Pixel 2
166939 Points ∼72% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +2%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% +18%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼89% +22%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points ∼62% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6421 Points ∼62% 0%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points ∼65% +4%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +2%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -13%
Google Pixel 2
7223 Points ∼70% +12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points ∼75% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
7496 Points ∼73% +6%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼81% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points ∼74% +7%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼76% +11%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼67% -3%
Google Pixel 2
8550 Points ∼83% +21%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼80% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼59% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points ∼73% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1213 Points ∼72% +3%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points ∼74% +7%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +9%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -15%
Google Pixel 2
1210 Points ∼71% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼70% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% -2%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼99% +42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points ∼65% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5791 Points ∼63% -2%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points ∼67% +5%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +4%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% 0%
Google Pixel 2
6052 Points ∼65% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +3%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points ∼78% +97%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1501 Points ∼34% -14%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points ∼92% +131%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +152%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% +19%
Google Pixel 2
2942 Points ∼67% +68%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼66% +67%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +73%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼28% -30%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points ∼57% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5336 Points ∼52% -9%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points ∼57% 0%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +1%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -27%
Google Pixel 2
5918 Points ∼58% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% -8%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼68%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points ∼81% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2739 Points ∼64% -6%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼70% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points ∼86% +27%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼88% +30%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -7%
Google Pixel 2
3360 Points ∼78% +16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼76% +13%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% +28%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points ∼55% -1%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼58% +4%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼56% 0%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% 0%
Google Pixel 2
7462 Points ∼52% -6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼59% +6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points ∼22% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6541 Points ∼23% +1%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼22% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points ∼23% +3%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼24% +5%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼21% -6%
Google Pixel 2
6256 Points ∼22% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼22% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼23% +3%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼36% +58%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼36% +60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points ∼32% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1915 Points ∼32% +3%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points ∼33% +4%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +6%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% +2%
Google Pixel 2
1924 Points ∼32% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +8%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼72% +130%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼70% +124%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points ∼44% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2658 Points ∼72% -9%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points ∼82% +3%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼82% +3%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% 0%
Google Pixel 2
3078 Points ∼84% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼68% -15%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼64% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼54% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points ∼69% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3925 Points ∼73% -1%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points ∼76% +3%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% -5%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -1%
Google Pixel 2
3974 Points ∼74% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% -12%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼64% -13%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼48% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points ∼61% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3549 Points ∼75% -3%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼76% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points ∼80% +3%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼75% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -1%
Google Pixel 2
3733 Points ∼79% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼67% -13%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼66% -15%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼51% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points ∼43% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2675 Points ∼73% +4%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points ∼80% +14%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼83% +17%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% +10%
Google Pixel 2
3080 Points ∼85% +20%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼67% -5%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼49% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points ∼62% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6007 Points ∼73% -1%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼71% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points ∼76% +3%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼58% -21%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% -3%
Google Pixel 2
6040 Points ∼73% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼60% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points ∼53% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
4705 Points ∼74% +1%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼74% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points ∼78% +7%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼66% -9%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% +2%
Google Pixel 2
4977 Points ∼78% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼63% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points ∼17% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
22530 Points ∼29% -2%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼25% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points ∼26% -12%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼25% -16%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -37%
Google Pixel 2
20482 Points ∼26% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼27% -7%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼32% +11%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼31% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points ∼11% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
54415 Points ∼12% +14%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points ∼12% +22%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼12% +21%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% +15%
Google Pixel 2
55247 Points ∼12% +15%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% -24%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼24% +135%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼24% +135%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points ∼15% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
41396 Points ∼20% +31%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼19% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points ∼20% +30%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼19% +27%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% +8%
Google Pixel 2
40116 Points ∼19% +27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼15% 0%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼31% +103%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼30% +96%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps ∼6% -2%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼5% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps ∼7% +7%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼7% +4%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% +2%
Google Pixel 2
112 fps ∼7% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼7% +9%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼10% +60%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼9% +45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps ∼13% 0%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 2
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼13% -1%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼26% +100%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
53 fps ∼10% -5%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps ∼11% +13%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +9%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% +5%
Google Pixel 2
52 fps ∼9% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +11%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼16% +58%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼13% +26%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps ∼13% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
58 fps ∼16% +12%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps ∼15% +8%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +8%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -33%
Google Pixel 2
54 fps ∼15% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% -21%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼16% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼31% +120%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps ∼6% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
40 fps ∼7% -2%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps ∼8% +5%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼8% +2%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% -2%
Google Pixel 2
31 fps ∼6% -24%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼4% -41%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼9% +19%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼10% +32%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼24%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps ∼21% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
59 fps ∼34% +40%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps ∼24% 0%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% -2%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -55%
Google Pixel 2
40 fps ∼23% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% -45%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼25% +5%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼62% +161%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps ∼6% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
24 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼7% +8%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% +4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Google Pixel 2
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼6% +4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps ∼21% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
50 fps ∼43% +100%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼22% +4%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼21% 0%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Google Pixel 2
25 fps ∼21% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼11% -48%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 6
32.14 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 2
38.4 fps ∼99%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps ∼79%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 6
38773 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points ∼96%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
44696 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points ∼97%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 6
733 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 2
836 Points ∼45%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼91%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60.1 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps ∼97%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +265%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼92% +237%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼32% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.453 Points ∼31% +15%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼29% +7%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
64.791 Points ∼29% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
63.675 Points ∼28% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
61.5 Points ∼27% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
54.201 Points ∼24% -12%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +249%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% +238%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼37% +28%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼34% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points ∼34% +18%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
11424 Points ∼32% +13%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
11380 Points ∼32% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
10672 Points ∼30% +6%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
9069 Points ∼26% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼100% -11%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
3414.7 ms * ∼94% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
3393.2 ms * ∼93% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼90%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
3199 ms * ∼88% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
2768 ms * ∼76% +15%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼76% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2667.5 ms * ∼73% +18%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼72% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼52% +42%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼20% +78%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼20% +78%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +111%
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼99% +108%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼54% +14%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
190 Points ∼53% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
166 Points ∼46% -2%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% -5%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼45% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
149 Points ∼42% -12%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼38% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52)
90 Points ∼25% -47%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XZ1Sony Xperia XZ PremiumHTC U11Xiaomi Mi 6Google Pixel 2Samsung Galaxy S8Huawei Mate 10 Pro
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
67%
16%
10%
1%
249%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-30%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-44%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
5%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-2%
Random Write 4KB
14.93
17.2
15%
79.97
436%
25.19
69%
18.03
21%
15.25
2%
164.45
1001%
Random Read 4KB
156.61
74.1
-53%
91.45
-42%
143.49
-8%
173.13
11%
127.17
-19%
132.27
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.43
194
-5%
206.41
1%
196.7
-4%
196.22
-4%
193.23
-5%
208.72
2%
Sequential Read 256KB
679.13
687
1%
717.33
6%
728.2
7%
758.35
12%
792.86
17%
732.46
8%
Carga Máxima
 32.2 °C33.8 °C37.3 °C 
 32.8 °C34.3 °C38.3 °C 
 31.7 °C34.1 °C36.6 °C 
Máximo: 38.3 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
31.8 °C31.3 °C31.1 °C
32.1 °C32.1 °C31.1 °C
31.1 °C31.6 °C31.3 °C
Máximo: 32.1 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 38.3 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.234.82532.932.63137.230.54031.7315039.635.16328.329.98027.32810026.922.612526.723.31602426.120020.934.125020.940.731519.550.540018.557.250017.56463017.565.180015.768.2100015.869.4125016.668.2160015.867.9200015.473.7250015.572.731501670.6400015.86550001666.6630016.364.1800016.364.71000016.263.61250016.460.91600016.455.2SPL28.680.9N1.146.3median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ1median 64.1Delta2.110.931.635.125.433.525.334.832.93433.629.431.629.628.424.92731.220.834.72239.821.348.320.855.321.259.519.462.219.567.117.77017.973.617.874.217.373.217.472.716.773.217.272.118.269.717.96917.666.317.766.917.86717.951.618.145.218.247.73082.41.354.8median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8median 66.91.311.831.63725.434.125.333.632.932.533.630.531.631.828.428.42724.920.829.62242.221.352.620.859.721.260.419.459.919.56217.766.617.96717.866.117.368.117.468.816.771.617.271.618.270.417.970.317.667.917.762.217.856.717.953.518.15118.238.13080.41.345.9median 17.9LG G6median 621.39hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

LG G6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.51 / 2.16 / 2.23 Watt
Carga midlight 7.45 / 9.28 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2700 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-0%
8%
16%
7%
27%
22%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.62
-22%
0.58
-14%
0.85
-67%
0.73
-43%
0.78
-53%
0.45
12%
0.73
-43%
Idle Average *
2.16
2.44
-13%
1.76
19%
1.15
47%
1.96
9%
1.1
49%
1.67
23%
1.44
33%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
2.59
-16%
1.81
19%
1.23
45%
1.98
11%
1.16
48%
1.69
24%
1.5
33%
Load Average *
7.45
4.94
34%
6.33
15%
4.12
45%
4.82
35%
4.15
44%
4.07
45%
6.91
7%
Load Maximum *
9.28
7.91
15%
9.18
1%
8.42
9%
7.15
23%
5.12
45%
8.54
8%
8.51
8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
26h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 62)
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 52min
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
25%
59%
-6%
-5%
23%
8%
Reader / Idle
1612
1754
9%
1744
8%
1457
-10%
1250
-22%
1534
-5%
H.264
580
802
38%
929
60%
564
-3%
498
-14%
623
7%
WiFi v1.3
601
695
16%
818
36%
575
-4%
560
-7%
739
23%
518
-14%
Load
172
236
37%
398
131%
161
-6%
212
23%
247
44%

Pro

+ SoC moderno e rápido
+ Sistema operacional atual
+ Alto-falantes estéreo
+ Tela brilhante de alta resolução
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Certificação IP65/68
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ DLNA
+ Suporte para uma ampla variedade de bandas de celular

Contra

- Marcos amplos
- Estamina pobre
- Sem dual SIM
- A câmera poderia ser mais sensível à luz
In review: Sony Xperia XZ1. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Os smartphones Xperia ainda são facilmente distinguíveis pelo seu design único, e o XZ1 se encaixa bem. Infelizmente, os marcos largos abaixo e acima da tela são uma desvantagem e deveriam ser uma coisa do passado atualmente. No lado positivo, a escolha dos materiais e a qualidade de fabricação são tão altas como se espera da Sony, e o alto nível de resistência à poeira e à água do XZ1 não é tão comum nos smartphones modernos como esperaríamos. Do ponto de vista técnico, ainda existem algumas falhas aqui e ali, como a falta de disponibilidade de GPS em ambientes fechados ou a estamina bastante embaraçosa sob carga. Consequentemente, não podemos recomendar este dispositivo a qualquer pessoa que use o telefone muito quando fora. No entanto, parece ser o telefone perfeito para viajantes freqüentes ao exterior devido à sua ampla gama de bandas 3G e 4G/LTE suportadas. Dito isto, o modelo Dual SIM já foi disponibilizado pela Sony e deve ser ainda melhor.

Moderno por dentro mais do que por fora. No lado positivo, o Xperia XZ1 vem com um sistema operacional atualizado, um processador rápido, alto-falantes estéreo e uma boa câmera. A carcaça é resistente a poeira e à água, mas os marcos antigos acima e abaixo da tela fazem parecer antigo e tudo menos moderno.

Características como o leitor de digitais são esperadas na faixa de preço do XZ1 de cerca de $600, mas o armazenamento interno do telefone parece bastante pequeno em comparação. Os alto-falantes estéreo sempre foram raros nos smartphones e o suporte para DLNA tornou-se cada vez mais raro e pode ser uma grande vantagem para aqueles que possuem servidores de mídia e receptores correspondentes em casa, particularmente para os cineastas entre os nossos leitores. É uma pena que os alto-falantes não sejam particularmente bons.

A câmera é sofisticada e decente, e o aplicativo de câmera bastante versátil não vai decepcionar seus usuários. No entanto, se a câmera for um ou mesmo o fator mais importante em um smartphone para você, sugerimos dar uma olhada mais de perto as alternativas feitas pela Apple, Samsung, Huawei e OnePlus.

O que finalmente defendeu o XZ1 são sua tela brilhante e viva e seu alto desempenho, ambas as quais são considerações importantes para os jogadores. A compatibilidade exclusiva do controle do PlayStation 4 vale a pena mencionar novamente neste momento. Pode não ser novo ou o ponto de venda mais importante, já que praticamente todos os smartphones podem ser usados em combinação com um controle de terceiros, mas certamente é uma vantagem se você já possui um controle de PS4.

Sony Xperia XZ1 - 11/28/2017 v6
Inge Schwabe

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
51 / 60 → 85%
Peso
92%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
65 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
81%
Médio
81%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ1
Inge Schwabe, 2017-12- 9 (Update: 2017-12-22)