snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M30s: Uma enorme bateria a um preço acessível

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/02/2019

A normal monster. A série Galaxy M é caracterizada por consistir em smartphones intermediários de baixo custo com designs modernos e baterias enormes. O Galaxy M30s não é diferente, com o dispositivo com uma bateria de 6.000 mAh, apesar de seu formato relativamente compacto. Continue lendo para descobrir se o dispositivo mais recente da série Galaxy M tem mais a oferecer do que apenas uma bateria enorme.

Samsung Galaxy M30s (Galaxy M Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9611
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.4 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, , 50.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de 512 GB. Slot dedicado para cartões microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159 x 75.1
Bateria
6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/2.0, detecção facial autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, vídeos de até 2160p/30 FPS. 8.0 MPix ultra-wide-angle lens, f/2.2,. 5.0 MPix depth of field camera, f/2.2.
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carrregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, Velocidade LTE: 600 Mbps downloads and 150 Mbps uploads. SAR values: Body - 1,130 W/kg, Head - 0.492 W/kg. FM radio, fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Preço
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
80%12/2019Samsung Galaxy M30s
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79%11/2019Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
665, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78%11/2019Motorola Moto G8 Plus
665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
78%09/2019Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80%03/2019Samsung Galaxy M20
7904, Mali-G71 MP2
186 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Galaxy M30s

Size Comparison

159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g156.4 mm 74.5 mm 8.8 mm 186 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
328 (min: 270, max: 341) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=459)
230 MBit/s ∼68% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼54% -45%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼47% -52%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
64 (min: 52, max: 69) MBit/s ∼19% -80%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (min: 257, max: 351) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=459)
219 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 (min: 2, max: 93) MBit/s ∼13% -87%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (270-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (257-351)
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Bridge
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
27.6 ∆E
46 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
57.6 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M30s: 39.99 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 64.29 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
19.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M30s: 12.96 ∆E min: 2.88 - max: 27.75 ∆E
A photo of our test chart in controlled lighting conditions
A photo of our test chart in controlled lighting conditions
A photo of our test chart at 1 lux
581
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 609 cd/m² Médio: 597.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 600 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.013
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Samsung Galaxy M20
PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.3
Screen
22%
-56%
-70%
-73%
Brightness middle
600
656
9%
597
0%
348
-42%
452
-25%
Brightness
597
643
8%
596
0%
355
-41%
445
-25%
Brightness Distribution
95
95
0%
93
-2%
91
-4%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.54
0.52
0.41
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.1
56%
5.93
-137%
5.86
-134%
5.3
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.17
2.4
67%
9.42
-31%
15.6
-118%
9.5
-32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2.2
-10%
5.3
-165%
3.6
-80%
6.8
-240%
Gamma
2.013 109%
2.2 100%
2.232 99%
2.232 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6399 102%
6263 104%
7632 85%
7051 92%
8355 78%
Contrast
1215
1148
1102

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 118 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 118 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 118 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
663 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼28% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
422 Points ∼28% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
663 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 3222, n=29)
1518 Points ∼100% +129%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1393 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
363 Points ∼18% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼18% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1393 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=35)
2004 Points ∼100% +44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1299 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1327 Points ∼67% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1299 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=46)
1979 Points ∼100% +52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
314 Points ∼55% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼55% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
349 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=46)
572 Points ∼100% +64%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5925 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼99% +10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5269 Points ∼81% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
5925 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=398)
5367 Points ∼82% -9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6697 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼91% +11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼98% +19%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5802 Points ∼71% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
6697 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=565)
5831 Points ∼71% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2134 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼84% +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2268 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼86% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2028 Points ∼76% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2134 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=75)
2683 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1320 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼32% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
901 Points ∼33% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼33% -31%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
964 Points ∼35% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1320 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=75)
2769 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1442 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼41% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1040 Points ∼41% -28%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼42% -27%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1091 Points ∼43% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1442 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=75)
2518 Points ∼100% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2103 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼96% +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼98% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1657 Points ∼69% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2103 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=405)
1996 Points ∼84% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1267 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼54% -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼54% -23%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼55% -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
488 Points ∼27% -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1267 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=405)
1811 Points ∼100% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1390 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼67% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼67% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼68% -18%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
579 Points ∼34% -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1390 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=406)
1681 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2275 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼98% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼98% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1677 Points ∼70% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2275 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=434)
1905 Points ∼80% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1634 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼69% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼69% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼69% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
650 Points ∼27% -60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1634 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=434)
2414 Points ∼100% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1743 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼88% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼88% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
752 Points ∼37% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1743 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=434)
2027 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2255 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼97% +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1657 Points ∼67% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2255 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=485)
1902 Points ∼77% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1203 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼64% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼65% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼62% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
488 Points ∼33% -59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1203 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=485)
1501 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1342 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼77% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼78% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼75% -19%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
582 Points ∼40% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1342 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=486)
1444 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2286 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼96% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1677 Points ∼68% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2286 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=526)
1765 Points ∼71% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1468 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼82% +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼83% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼84% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
650 Points ∼33% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1468 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=525)
1967 Points ∼100% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1595 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼97% +8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼99% +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
752 Points ∼42% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1595 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=528)
1697 Points ∼95% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20118 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼96% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12500 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
20118 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=686)
14321 Points ∼70% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15971 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼98% +54%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼99% +56%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13392 Points ∼53% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
15971 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=684)
22437 Points ∼89% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16738 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼99% +41%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼98% +39%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13183 Points ∼56% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
16738 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=684)
18114 Points ∼76% +8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
14 fps ∼34% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
41 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=704)
38.4 fps ∼94% -6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
37 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼63% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼23% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
37 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=713)
28.3 fps ∼54% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼86% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7 fps ∼32% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=609)
22.2 fps ∼100% +11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.2 fps ∼18% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=618)
19.6 fps ∼58% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼72% -7%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.3 fps ∼24% -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
14 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=474)
18.1 fps ∼100% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼46% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.8 fps ∼15% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
14 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=476)
16.9 fps ∼65% +21%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.3 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼28% -66%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼45% -46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼90% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.7 fps ∼27% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.3 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=197)
10.1 fps ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.6 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼63% +22%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.7 fps ∼24% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
3.6 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=196)
7.03 fps ∼100% +95%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.8 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼48% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼51% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.3 fps ∼29% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.8 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=201)
14.9 fps ∼99% +69%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.8 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼49% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼49% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼28% -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
9.8 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=201)
16.7 fps ∼100% +70%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.6 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼56% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼59% -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼58% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.6 fps ∼21% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
9.6 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=399)
12.3 fps ∼100% +28%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.8 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼51% -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.7 fps ∼21% -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
8.8 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=403)
11 fps ∼85% +25%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.8 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10% -40%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11.99 fps ∼14% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
13.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=66)
85.4 fps ∼100% +519%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10.82 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼11% -39%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10.74 fps ∼17% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
10.8 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=59)
62.8 fps ∼100% +480%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
12.34 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
12.3 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=56)
97.3 fps ∼100% +688%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1755 Score ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼50% -35%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1092 Score ∼48% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1755 Score ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=63)
2271 Score ∼100% +29%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1025 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼67% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
926 Points ∼66% -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
984 Points ∼70% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1025 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=642)
764 Points ∼55% -25%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2127 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1916 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1038 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2127 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=642)
2105 Points ∼99% -1%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2122 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼88% +32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2835 Points ∼89% +34%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2973 Points ∼94% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2122 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=642)
1552 Points ∼49% -27%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4978 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼98% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5000 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3957 Points ∼78% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
4978 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=642)
3030 Points ∼60% -39%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2191 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼88% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼88% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1862 Points ∼73% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
2191 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=642)
1521 Points ∼60% -31%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
33717 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27705 Points ∼75% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
33717 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 78191, n=16)
36840 Points ∼100% +9%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
44128 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼79% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼79% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
37857 Points ∼79% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
44128 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=16)
48141 Points ∼100% +9%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
34020 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33527 Points ∼44% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
34020 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 199051, n=16)
75825 Points ∼100% +123%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
63005 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼82% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼82% +13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
70133 Points ∼81% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
63005 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40746 - 151146, n=16)
86071 Points ∼100% +37%
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
174870 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼69% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
169222 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
174870 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 501784, n=16)
246877 Points ∼100% +41%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=114)
36.1 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼85% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼85% +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.531 Points ∼85% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
28.73 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
28.7 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2)
22.57 Points ∼63% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
51.922 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
51.9 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
49.754 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
45.142 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=539)
42.3 Points ∼81% -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=102)
40 runs/min ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼77% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼76%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼76% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
30.5 runs/min ∼76% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)
29.5 runs/min ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
19.3 runs/min ∼48% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=172)
67.2 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy M20
52 Points ∼77% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼77% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
51 Points ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
50 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
50 Points ∼74% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
9684 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
9684 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼96% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
9107 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M20
9087 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=700)
6885 Points ∼71% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=725)
10463 ms * ∼100% -142%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼44% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼44% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
4504 ms * ∼43% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)
4332.2 ms * ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
4332 ms * ∼41% -0%
Samsung Galaxy M20
3703 ms * ∼35% +15%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M30sXiaomi Redmi Note 8Motorola Moto G8 PlusXiaomi Mi A3Samsung Galaxy M20Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-17%
-8%
-28%
-5%
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
65.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
51.1 (17.1 - 71.9, n=28)
-16%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=436)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.19 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
81.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
67.4 (18 - 86.6, n=28)
-9%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=436)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
137.1
91.23
-33%
124.9
-9%
117.4
-14%
44
-68%
60.1 (8.77 - 165, n=38)
-56%
23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762)
-83%
Random Read 4KB
133.8
84.76
-37%
59.9
-55%
126.9
-5%
64
-52%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=38)
0%
48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.7
160.53
-16%
217.4
14%
184
-4%
137
-28%
199 (133 - 388, n=38)
4%
99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
483.6
297.65
-38%
302.5
-37%
502.2
4%
300
-38%
711 (484 - 895, n=38)
47%
280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762)
-42%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.8 (54-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø27.8 (22-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø28 (18-30)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.4: Ø57.3 (1-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.4: Ø59.8 (59-60)
Carga Máxima
 36 °C29.9 °C28.6 °C 
 35 °C30.1 °C29.2 °C 
 32.5 °C29.1 °C28.5 °C 
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 31 °C
27.4 °C29.1 °C33.3 °C
27.8 °C29.2 °C33.9 °C
28.2 °C29.7 °C32.3 °C
Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204346.42536.842.93132.833.74033.735.75040.1386331.333.58024.725.410025.624.912522.123.216019.927.420019.337.125017.244.331517.451.240017.156.850017.360.56301562.58001563.6100018.672.1125014.574.8160015.774.4200014.472.3250014.470.9315014.166.9400014.259.7500014.358.1630014.562.4800014.570.81000014.577.31250014.565.71600014.752.6SPL64.460.727.582.8N1612.9149.8median 15median 62.4Delta1.512.832.233.527.824.824.125.824.924.833.333.223.824.426.23326.227.117.429.617.239.717.339.816.444.216.250.815.755.314.661.316.364.113.468.613.870.714.371.313.869.714.370.514.671.513.775.514.57214.470.314.37014.672.514.673.314.569.714.859.826.783.30.855median 14.6median 69.71.410.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M30sSamsung Galaxy M20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M30s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy M20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 5 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M30s
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M20
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-30%
-5%
5%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.62
38%
1.7
-70%
0.8
20%
0.94
6%
1
-0%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=789)
12%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.77
7%
2.3
-21%
2
-5%
2.37
-25%
1.9
-0%
1.739 (0.6 - 6.2, n=788)
8%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.8
25%
3.5
-46%
3.3
-38%
2.42
-1%
2.4
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=789)
15%
Load Average *
5
3.42
32%
4.7
6%
4.1
18%
3.83
23%
5
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=783)
19%
Load Maximum *
6.3
6.14
3%
7.5
-19%
7.7
-22%
5.07
20%
6.3
-0%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=783)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 36min
Samsung Galaxy M30s
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M20
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-14%
-17%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2206
2139
-3%
2002
-9%
1724
-22%
1904
-14%
H.264
1269
859
-32%
996
-22%
1023
-19%
1121
-12%
WiFi v1.3
1154
824
-29%
980
-15%
985
-15%
927.5
-20%
Load
336
217
-35%
302
-10%
297
-12%
288
-14%

Pro

+ Duração de bateria líder da classe
+ Design elegante
+ Bem construído
+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso
+ Veloz armazenamento interno
+ Tela brilhante
+ Sensor de digitais preciso
+ Módulo GPS preciso
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Atualizações de segurança desatualizadas
- Aplicativos com anúncios pré instalados
- Alto falante mono ruim
- Afogamento do desempenho sob uso intenso

Veredicto - Finalizado e recomendável

The Samsung Galaxy M30s smartphone review.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s smartphone review.

O Samsung Galaxy M30s é um aparelho acessível, com poucos compromissos. Nossa unidade de teste possui excelente duração da bateria, armazenamento rápido, muita RAM e é construída de forma robusta, apesar da tampa traseira de plástico.

O dispositivo também possui Wi-Fi comparativamente rápido, enquanto a precisão do seu módulo GPS nos impressionou. Da mesma forma, seu painel AMOLED de 6,4 polegadas deve oferecer brilho suficiente para a maioria das pessoas, e poucos devem ter alguma reclamação sobre a precisão de sua tela táctil ou leitor de digitais.

No entanto, o Galaxy M30s sofre de algumas deficiências. Em primeiro lugar, a Samsung tem falhado em liberar atualizações de patches de segurança nos últimos tempos. No momento da redação deste artigo, nossa análise está presa em patches de três atrás, o que é inaceitável em nossa opinião. Além disso, a Samsung pré-instala aplicativos de publicidade de terceiros, o que é outro problema. Em segundo lugar, nossa unidade de teste se afoga sob uso intenso contínuo, o que é decepcionante. Temos nossas dúvidas com a qualidade de áudio do alto-falante mono, a qualidade das chamadas de nossa unidade de teste e a potência do carregador incluído, mas esses são problemas menores do que os de SoC e de software.

O Samsung Galaxy M30s tem uma duração de bateria fantástica, boas câmeras e uma tela AMOLED brilhante. Embora tenhamos alguns problemas com o dispositivo, ainda o recomendamos se você tiver um orçamento de cerca de 250 Euros (~US$ 275).

No geral, o Galaxy M30s oferece grande valor pelo dinheiro. Nossa unidade de teste nos impressionou em muitas áreas, enquanto nossos problemas com ela devem ter um impacto limitado no uso diário.

Samsung Galaxy M30s - 11/25/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
77%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 66%
Peso
89%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
15 / 64 → 23%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 86 → 69%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 76%
Camera
62%
Médio
73%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M30s: Uma enorme bateria a um preço acessível
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12- 2 (Update: 2019-12- 4)