snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Um sonho de tela para o comprador consciente dos preços

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/15/2019

A surpresa da tela. O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone Xiaomi de nível básico, mas redefine a qualidade das telas que esperamos de dispositivos abaixo de 200 Euros (~US$ 220). O painel é brilhante, rico em contraste e até adequado para aqueles que são sensíveis ao PWM. O Redmi Note 8 não é somente boas notícias, como nossa unidade de teste estabelecerá.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Redmi Note Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.3 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, , 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C, OTG, LED de status, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 158.3 x 75.3
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 8 MP, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, guia de início rápido, capa protetora, MiUI, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.089 W/kg, Head - 0.191 W/kg. DRM Widevine: L1 (EU) L3 (China), fanless
peso
190 g, Suprimento de energia: 51 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device overview

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
79%11/2019Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
665, Adreno 610		190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78%09/2019Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610		173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
81%04/2019Nokia 4.2
439, Adreno 505		161 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
76%07/2019Samsung Galaxy A20e
7884B, Mali-G71 MP2		141 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.8"1560x720
76%10/2019LG K50
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320		170 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
71%08/2019Gigaset GS195
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322		180 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.18"2246x1080
85%05/2019Honor 20 Lite
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4		164 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Size Comparison

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 170 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g156.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.4 mm 180 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 164 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais 
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=461)
230 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Gigaset GS195
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 (min: 43, max: 53) MBit/s ∼15% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=461)
219 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼13% -87%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼12% -88%
Gigaset GS195
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25.7 (min: 18, max: 33) MBit/s ∼8% -92%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
26.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
38 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 42.48 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 74.73 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
14.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 7.95 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 16.92 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart at 1 lux
Our test chart in detail
624
cd/m²		639
cd/m²		636
cd/m²
632
cd/m²		656
cd/m²		647
cd/m²
658
cd/m²		652
cd/m²		639
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 658 cd/m² Médio: 642.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1215:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3		Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09		Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71		Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8		LG K50
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26		Gigaset GS195
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18		Honor 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21		Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
-191%
-114%
-160%
-89%
-155%
-92%
8%
Brightness middle
656
348
-47%
445
-32%
475
-28%
489
-25%
487
-26%
455
-31%
593
-10%
Brightness
643
355
-45%
424
-34%
473
-26%
453
-30%
507
-21%
456
-29%
587
-9%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
91
-4%
93
-2%
85
-11%
84
-12%
94
-1%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.54
0.26
52%
0.35
35%
0.42
22%
0.55
-2%
0.58
-7%
Contrast
1215
1712
41%
1357
12%
1164
-4%
885
-27%
784
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.1
5.86
-433%
5.9
-436%
6.8
-518%
4.75
-332%
5.67
-415%
4.43
-303%
0.9
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.4
15.6
-550%
9.3
-288%
13.4
-458%
7.75
-223%
13.54
-464%
6.81
-184%
2
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.6
-64%
6.8
-209%
8.7
-295%
4.6
-109%
8.2
-273%
5.4
-145%
1.5
32%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.232 99%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.164 102%
2.27 97%
2.248 98%
2.27 97%
CCT
6263 104%
7051 92%
8443 77%
9385 69%
7510 87%
7569 86%
7336 89%
6548 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | AnTuTu v8
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
363 Points ∼18%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
272 Points ∼13% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 370, n=2)
367 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=36)
2015 Points ∼100% +455%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1327 Points ∼67%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
809 Points ∼41% -39%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
832 Points ∼42% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1327 - 1379, n=2)
1353 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=47)
1995 Points ∼100% +50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
314 Points ∼55%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
177 Points ∼31% -44%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
155 Points ∼27% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (314 - 315, n=2)
315 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=47)
575 Points ∼100% +83%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5122 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼66% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼41% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼42% -36%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2680 Points ∼34% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2631 Points ∼34% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼87% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5122 - 5144, n=2)
5133 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼60% -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5366 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼82% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼54% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3480 Points ∼51% -35%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5335 Points ∼78% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼85% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5366 - 5663, n=2)
5515 Points ∼80% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼69% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1495 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼35% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼48% -19%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
773 Points ∼31% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1537 Points ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼100% +69%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼71% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1495 - 1536, n=2)
1516 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼57% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼61% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼70% -18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4052 Points ∼54% -38%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
4644 Points ∼62% -29%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5829 Points ∼77% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6396 - 6534, n=3)
6476 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=399)
5379 Points ∼71% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼88% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼69% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼76% -7%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4635 Points ∼51% -38%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
6601 Points ∼73% -11%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7388 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼92% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7446 - 8186, n=3)
7872 Points ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=566)
5844 Points ∼65% -22%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼83% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼72% -10%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼84% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2250 - 2300, n=3)
2273 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=76)
2691 Points ∼97% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼32% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼18% -45%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1220 Points ∼43% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼68% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (898 - 908, n=3)
902 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=76)
2807 Points ∼100% +213%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼41% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼19% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼23% -42%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1365 Points ∼54% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼81% +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1036 - 1049, n=3)
1042 Points ∼41% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=76)
2550 Points ∼100% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼74% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼50% -29%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼29% -59%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1401 Points ∼43% -39%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2109 Points ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼100% +41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2298 - 2387, n=3)
2342 Points ∼72% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=406)
2002 Points ∼62% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼45% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼19% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼20% -55%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
434 Points ∼20% -56%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
383 Points ∼18% -61%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
829 Points ∼38% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼85% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 987, n=3)
983 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=406)
1824 Points ∼84% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼21% -57%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
457 Points ∼19% -60%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
958 Points ∼41% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼100% +107%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼84% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1126 - 1135, n=3)
1132 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=407)
1693 Points ∼72% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼71% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼49% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼28% -60%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1407 Points ∼43% -40%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2124 Points ∼64% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼76% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2343 - 2393, n=3)
2361 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=435)
1910 Points ∼58% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼50% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
701 Points ∼21% -58%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
644 Points ∼19% -61%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1233 Points ∼37% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼100% +99%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼86% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1668 - 1674, n=3)
1671 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=435)
2432 Points ∼73% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼54% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼24% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
742 Points ∼22% -58%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
732 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1360 Points ∼41% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼100% +86%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1778 - 1790, n=3)
1785 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=435)
2040 Points ∼62% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼77% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼49% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼51% -32%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
897 Points ∼28% -63%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1371 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2378 Points ∼74% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼78% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2408 - 2477, n=3)
2436 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=486)
1907 Points ∼59% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼46% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼18% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
257 Points ∼13% -73%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
288 Points ∼14% -70%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
710 Points ∼35% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼85% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (931 - 979, n=3)
959 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=486)
1510 Points ∼75% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼49% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼20% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼24% -53%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
305 Points ∼14% -73%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
349 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
841 Points ∼38% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼100% +97%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼84% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1081 - 1128, n=3)
1108 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=487)
1453 Points ∼66% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼76% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼51% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
911 Points ∼28% -62%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1362 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2441 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2378 - 2471, n=3)
2434 Points ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=527)
1770 Points ∼55% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼52% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
423 Points ∼13% -74%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
503 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
667 Points ∼21% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼100% +98%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼87% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1607 - 1651, n=3)
1631 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=526)
1982 Points ∼62% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼56% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼25% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
480 Points ∼15% -72%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
585 Points ∼18% -66%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
795 Points ∼25% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼100% +85%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1728 - 1782, n=3)
1758 Points ∼55% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=529)
1708 Points ∼53% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼96% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼59% -41%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9674 Points ∼48% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼95% -5%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (18698 - 20354, n=3)
19535 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=687)
14357 Points ∼71% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼54% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼29% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼25% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10826 Points ∼23% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼85% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (24654 - 25219, n=3)
24955 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=685)
22559 Points ∼48% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼67% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼37% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼33% -51%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10547 Points ∼30% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼100% +51%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼81% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (23253 - 23693, n=3)
23493 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=685)
18200 Points ∼51% -23%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼47% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼30% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼26% -44%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼25% -47%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼51% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼100% +114%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼84% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (36 - 36, n=3)
36 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=705)
38.5 fps ∼50% +7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼90% +58%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼59% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼53% -6%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼45% -21%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼62% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +76%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼98% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (33 - 52, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼68% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=714)
28.3 fps ∼49% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼53% +5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼29% -42%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼55% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼84% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=610)
22.3 fps ∼59% +17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼59% +18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼56% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼91% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17 - 34, n=3)
23 fps ∼68% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=619)
19.6 fps ∼58% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼24% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼24% -50%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼22% -54%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼52% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼85% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=3)
13 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=475)
18.2 fps ∼67% +40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼54% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼38% -17%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼50% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼85% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (12 - 26, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼64% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=477)
17 fps ∼65% +42%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼89% +225%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼47% +71%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼40% +46%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1.9 fps ∼19% -32%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼41% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼91% +232%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼80% +193%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.8 - 9.1, n=3)
5.47 fps ∼54% +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=198)
10.2 fps ∼100% +264%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -36%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -73%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% -68%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% -68%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1.2 fps ∼17% -73%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼86% +39%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼71% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.8 - 4.4, n=3)
3.33 fps ∼47% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=197)
7.08 fps ∼100% +61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼52% +8%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% -6%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3 fps ∼20% -58%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼43% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼87% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.2 - 15, n=3)
9.93 fps ∼66% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=202)
15 fps ∼100% +108%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼50% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼21% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼24% -51%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% -54%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3.2 fps ∼19% -60%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼42% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼95% +98%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼83% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (8.1 - 8.4, n=3)
8.23 fps ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=202)
16.8 fps ∼100% +107%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼44% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼22% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼26% -39%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼18% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +132%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼81% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=3)
7.07 fps ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=400)
12.4 fps ∼78% +80%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼66% +41%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps ∼30% -36%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼52% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼92% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.1 - 13, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼66% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=404)
11.1 fps ∼85% +82%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11.99 fps ∼14% +46%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.41 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼20% +105%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼17% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (8.24 - 12, n=2)
10.1 fps ∼12% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=66)
85.4 fps ∼100% +936%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10.74 fps ∼17% +62%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.62 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼22% +104%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼19% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.65 - 10.7, n=2)
8.7 fps ∼14% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=59)
62.8 fps ∼100% +844%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.16 fps ∼4% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼16% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼13% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
7.44 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=56)
97.3 fps ∼100% +1208%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1092 Score ∼48% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
552 Score ∼24% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼88% +76%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼74% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1092 - 1134, n=2)
1113 Score ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=63)
2271 Score ∼100% +100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +49%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼60% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼79% +18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼73% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼79% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼77% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=3)
1088 Points ∼78% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=643)
765 Points ∼55% -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼53% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼28% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼25% -53%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1462 Points ∼41% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼87% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1916, n=3)
1894 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=643)
2116 Points ∼59% +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼68% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼28% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼43% -28%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
661 Points ∼14% -76%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3096 Points ∼67% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼100% +65%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼63% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2808 - 3174, n=3)
2939 Points ∼63% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=643)
1558 Points ∼34% -45%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼75% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼40% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼50% -33%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2165 Points ∼32% -57%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5238 Points ∼77% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼84% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5000 - 5089, n=3)
5032 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=643)
3039 Points ∼45% -39%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼77% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼39% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼48% -29%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
323 Points ∼10% -86%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2220 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼82% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2240 - 2556, n=3)
2350 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=643)
1526 Points ∼46% -32%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (27535 - 27705, n=3)
27592 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 78191, n=17)
38778 Points ∼100% +41%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼77% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (37857 - 38271, n=3)
38133 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=17)
49489 Points ∼100% +29%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (33000 - 33527, n=3)
33176 Points ∼41% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 199051, n=17)
81164 Points ∼100% +146%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (70133 - 70889, n=3)
70637 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40746 - 151146, n=17)
88721 Points ∼100% +25%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼66% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (169222 - 169695, n=3)
169537 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 501784, n=17)
258152 Points ∼100% +52%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115)
36.4 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30.5 - 30.7, n=3)
30.6 Points ∼84% 0%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
30.008 Points ∼82% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼59% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼44% -48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
51.061 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (49.8 - 51, n=3)
50.4 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=540)
42.5 Points ∼83% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
39.076 Points ∼77% -22%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
27.086 Points ∼53% -46%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
22.823 Points ∼45% -55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=103)
40.2 runs/min ∼100% +31%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
33 runs/min ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (29.5 - 30.8, n=3)
30.3 runs/min ∼75% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)
29.5 runs/min ∼73% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼54% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼45% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=173)
67.4 Points ∼100% +30%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
62 Points ∼92% +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼86% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (51 - 58, n=3)
53.7 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼71% -8%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼56% -27%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
26 Points ∼39% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
9591 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (9107 - 9405, n=3)
9257 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=701)
6908 Points ∼72% -27%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼50% -49%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
4258 Points ∼44% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
12799.1 ms * ∼100% -181%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=726)
10451 ms * ∼82% -129%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼76% -114%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼43% -22%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
4852.6 ms * ∼38% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼36% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4504 - 4584, n=3)
4550 ms * ∼36% -0%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Mi A3Nokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eLG K50Gigaset GS195Honor 20 LiteAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
26%
-41%
-16%
-28%
-46%
-3%
-7%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
25%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
27%
65 (52.8 - 73.5, n=14)
23%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=437)
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
77.1 (71.6 - 85.9, n=14)
8%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=437)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
91.23
117.4
29%
4.31
-95%
13.18
-86%
12.03
-87%
4.97
-95%
73.1
-20%
38.9 (8.48 - 127, n=16)
-57%
23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
84.76
126.9
50%
17.51
-79%
79.76
-6%
52.12
-39%
28.43
-66%
38.7
-54%
69.5 (20.7 - 108, n=16)
-18%
48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762)
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
160.53
184
15%
18.17
-89%
103.57
-35%
78.9
-51%
29.42
-82%
200.9
25%
171 (90 - 201, n=16)
7%
99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
297.65
502.2
69%
220.39
-26%
300.36
1%
263.42
-12%
107.25
-64%
288.1
-3%
286 (144 - 499, n=16)
-4%
280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762)
-6%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (20-26)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø14.8 (9-23)
; Standard / low: Ø20.3 (12-31)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.6 (49-60)
Carga Máxima
 33.9 °C36.2 °C33.5 °C 
 35.3 °C35 °C33.8 °C 
 35.2 °C34.7 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
32.6 °C32.5 °C35.3 °C
32.3 °C32.4 °C34.8 °C
31.8 °C33.3 °C34.5 °C
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.927.52529.130.53125.431.94029.427.55039.432.86327.327.78021.622.81002421.812520.724.516019.941.52001847.725016.854.531516.26140015.963.950013.568.563013.970.880012.972.110001472.4125014.774.6160014.175.3200014.275.3250014.575.1315015.474.2400014.978.9500014.878.463001575.4800015.377.81000015.378.81250015.6711600015.556.5SPL2787.7N0.973.3median 15.3median 72.1Delta1.310.339.939.243.842.636.539.336.145.245.141.335.740.826.73528.533.926.535.424.843.724.648.42452.822.556.42060.920.465.619.869.119.369.923.875.517.875.11878.217.376.916.675.515.77215.764.815.769.415.673.915.772.615.767.515.756.615.753.168.730.785.722.21.562.6median 18median 67.54.39.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Mi A3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.77 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 3.42 / 6.14 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh		Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh		LG K50
3500 mAh		Gigaset GS195
4000 mAh		Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-34%
-1%
14%
18%
-48%
-36%
-35%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.8
-29%
0.74
-19%
0.66
-6%
0.7
-13%
1
-61%
0.9
-45%
1.04 (0.62 - 1.7, n=3)
-68%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=791)
-42%
Idle Average *
1.77
2
-13%
1.9
-7%
1.63
8%
1
44%
2.1
-19%
1.6
10%
2.02 (1.77 - 2.3, n=3)
-14%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=790)
2%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
3.3
-83%
2.21
-23%
1.67
7%
1.8
-0%
3.2
-78%
2.2
-22%
2.87 (1.8 - 3.5, n=3)
-59%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=791)
-13%
Load Average *
3.42
4.1
-20%
3.04
11%
2.77
19%
2.4
30%
4.7
-37%
6
-75%
4.07 (3.42 - 4.7, n=3)
-19%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=785)
-19%
Load Maximum *
6.14
7.7
-25%
4.15
32%
3.66
40%
4.5
27%
9
-47%
9.1
-48%
7.11 (6.14 - 7.7, n=3)
-16%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=785)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 39min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 37min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh		Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh		LG K50
3500 mAh		Gigaset GS195
4000 mAh		Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
-16%
-11%
0%
6%
-17%
Reader / Idle
2139
1724
-19%
1432
-33%
H.264
859
1023
19%
753
-12%
WiFi v1.3
824
985
20%
696
-16%
715
-13%
822
0%
872
6%
685
-17%
Load
217
297
37%
250
15%

Pro

+ Painel IPS de alta qualidade
+ Dual SIM
+ Slots para cartão microSD
+ Conector de 3,5 mm
+ Alto-falante mono decente
+ Bem construído
+ Aparência premium
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Apenas BT 4.2?
- Armazenamento UFS restrito ao modelo Pro
- Sem banda LTE 20 ou Widevine L3 no modelo chinês
- Câmeras fracas no modelo carro-chefe
- Ergonomia

Veredicto - Um forte conceito geral

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone de sucesso da Xiaomi, que oferece muita energia para quem está com orçamento limitado. O hardware que a Xiaomi incluiu por cerca de 150 Euros (~US$ 165) é notável, embora tenha em mente que esse preço se aplica apenas à versão importada. O mesmo se aplica ao seu acabamento de alta qualidade e qualidade de construção, enquanto também somos fãs do seu grande painel IPS. Embora este último não ofereça a taxa de contraste de um painel OLED, ele usa o PWM para regular a luminosidade, o que é um bônus para aqueles que são sensíveis a esse tipo de oscilação.

A Xiaomi também não se comprometeu em nenhuma área, mas o modelo de 128 GB de armazenamento e 6 GB de RAM custa quase o mesmo que o Mi 9T ou o Mi 9 SE. Enquanto o Redmi Note 8 alcança seus irmãos Mi em muitas áreas, ele não pode competir com eles no desempenho da câmera.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 é um smartphone de nível básico triunfante. No entanto, certifique-se de comprar a versão correta.

Uma palavra sobre a compra de uma variante chinesa importada. Em primeiro lugar, você pode incorrer em despesas por trocas ou devoluções caras de garantia, algo que não ocorreria com um aparelho comprado na região local. Em segundo lugar, a versão chinesa do Redmi Note 8 só pode transmitir conteúdo protegido por DRM em definição padrão, uma desvantagem que não afeta o modelo europeu. Por fim, o modelo chinês não vem com Google Play Services pré-instalado, embora possam ser carregados depois. No entanto, poucos smartphones a 200 Euros (~ US$ 220) oferecem tanto quanto o Redmi Note 8, por isso recomendamos sinceramente que verifique a versão europeia se os problemas que afetam o modelo chinês forem um obstáculo para você.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - 11/12/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 66%