Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Um sonho de tela para o comprador consciente dos preços

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Brand: Xiaomi

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/15/2019

A surpresa da tela. O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone Xiaomi de nível básico, mas redefine a qualidade das telas que esperamos de dispositivos abaixo de 200 Euros (~US$ 220). O painel é brilhante, rico em contraste e até adequado para aqueles que são sensíveis ao PWM. O Redmi Note 8 não é somente boas notícias, como nossa unidade de teste estabelecerá.

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Redmi Note Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memória

6144 MB

Pantalha

6.3 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, , 108 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C, OTG, LED de status, Miracast

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 158.3 x 75.3

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 8 MP, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. 2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 μm. Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, guia de início rápido, capa protetora, MiUI, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.089 W/kg, Head - 0.191 W/kg. DRM Widevine: L1 (EU) L3 (China), fanless

peso

190 g, Suprimento de energia: 51 g

Preço

200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Device overview

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79%	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 665, Adreno 610	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.3"	2340x1080
78%	09/2019	Xiaomi Mi A3 665, Adreno 610	173.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.09"	1560x720
81%	04/2019	Nokia 4.2 439, Adreno 505	161 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.71"	1520x720
76%	07/2019	Samsung Galaxy A20e 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2	141 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.8"	1560x720
75%	10/2019	LG K50 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	170 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.26"	1520x720
71%	08/2019	Gigaset GS195 SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322	180 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.18"	2246x1080
85%	05/2019	Honor 20 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	164 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.21"	2340x1080

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1014, n=481)	234 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Gigaset GS195 GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 (min: 43, max: 53) MBit/s ∼15% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 966, n=481)	221 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
LG K50 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼13% -87%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼12% -88%
Gigaset GS195 GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25.7 (min: 18, max: 33) MBit/s ∼8% -92%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Overview

GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Huawei P30 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

26.8 ∆E

48.9 ∆E

36 ∆E

38 ∆E

39.6 ∆E

59.1 ∆E

49.1 ∆E

30.6 ∆E

35.4 ∆E

22.9 ∆E

59.7 ∆E

60.4 ∆E

27.3 ∆E

45.4 ∆E

31.1 ∆E

70.2 ∆E

36.4 ∆E

42.4 ∆E

74.7 ∆E

66.6 ∆E

48.8 ∆E

34.8 ∆E

22.3 ∆E

13 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 42.48 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 74.73 ∆E

14.6 ∆E

8.5 ∆E

11.1 ∆E

16.9 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

6 ∆E

12.5 ∆E

9.1 ∆E

5 ∆E

6.2 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

9.3 ∆E

12.2 ∆E

11.2 ∆E

1.3 ∆E

6.4 ∆E

7 ∆E

4.1 ∆E

2.9 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

1.8 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 7.95 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 16.92 ∆E


624 cd/m²	639 cd/m²	636 cd/m²
632 cd/m²	656 cd/m²	647 cd/m²
658 cd/m²	652 cd/m²	639 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 658 cd/m² Médio: 642.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1215:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8	LG K50 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26	Gigaset GS195 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		-191%	-114%	-160%	-89%	-155%	-92%	8%
Brightness middle	656	348 -47%	445 -32%	475 -28%	489 -25%	487 -26%	455 -31%	593 -10%
Brightness	643	355 -45%	424 -34%	473 -26%	453 -30%	507 -21%	456 -29%	587 -9%
Brightness Distribution	95	91 -4%	91 -4%	93 -2%	85 -11%	84 -12%	94 -1%	94 -1%
Black Level *	0.54		0.26 52%	0.35 35%	0.42 22%	0.55 -2%	0.58 -7%
Contrast	1215		1712 41%	1357 12%	1164 -4%	885 -27%	784 -35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.1	5.86 -433%	5.9 -436%	6.8 -518%	4.75 -332%	5.67 -415%	4.43 -303%	0.9 18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	2.4	15.6 -550%	9.3 -288%	13.4 -458%	7.75 -223%	13.54 -464%	6.81 -184%	2 17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.2	3.6 -64%	6.8 -209%	8.7 -295%	4.6 -109%	8.2 -273%	5.4 -145%	1.5 32%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.232 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.33 ^94%	2.164 ^102%	2.27 ^97%	2.248 ^98%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6263 ^104%	7051 ^92%	8443 ^77%	9385 ^69%	7510 ^87%	7569 ^86%	7336 ^89%	6548 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13539 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	363 Points ∼21%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	272 Points ∼15% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 371, n=3)	368 Points ∼21% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 4593, n=48)	1757 Points ∼100% +384%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1327 Points ∼71%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	809 Points ∼43% -39%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	832 Points ∼45% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1327 - 1392, n=3)	1366 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=60)	1865 Points ∼100% +41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	314 Points ∼59%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	177 Points ∼33% -44%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	155 Points ∼29% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (313 - 315, n=3)	314 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 1344, n=60)	531 Points ∼100% +69%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5122 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5144 Points ∼66% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points ∼41% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3271 Points ∼42% -36%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2680 Points ∼34% -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2631 Points ∼34% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points ∼87% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5122 - 5144, n=2)	5133 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=330)	4670 Points ∼60% -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5366 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5663 Points ∼82% +6%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3714 Points ∼54% -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3480 Points ∼51% -35%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5335 Points ∼78% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points ∼100% +28%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points ∼85% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5366 - 5663, n=2)	5515 Points ∼80% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=389)	4721 Points ∼69% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1495 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1536 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points ∼35% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1212 Points ∼48% -19%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	773 Points ∼31% -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1537 Points ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points ∼100% +69%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points ∼71% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=2)	1516 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=389)	1425 Points ∼56% -5%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6498 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points ∼61% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points ∼70% -18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4052 Points ∼54% -38%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	4644 Points ∼62% -29%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5829 Points ∼77% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6396 - 6587, n=4)	6504 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=419)	5410 Points ∼72% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7446 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points ∼88% +7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points ∼69% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points ∼76% -7%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4635 Points ∼51% -38%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	6601 Points ∼73% -11%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7388 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points ∼92% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7446 - 8186, n=3)	7872 Points ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=581)	5889 Points ∼65% -21%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2250 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points ∼83% +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points ∼72% -10%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2336 Points ∼84% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2232 - 2300, n=4)	2263 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 15735, n=90)	2642 Points ∼95% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	898 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points ∼35% +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points ∼16% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points ∼19% -45%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1220 Points ∼47% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points ∼74% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 908, n=4)	901 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 14536, n=90)	2584 Points ∼100% +188%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1036 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points ∼44% +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points ∼21% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points ∼25% -42%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1365 Points ∼57% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points ∼87% +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1049, n=4)	1040 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 14786, n=90)	2379 Points ∼100% +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2298 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points ∼74% +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points ∼50% -29%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points ∼29% -59%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1401 Points ∼43% -39%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2109 Points ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points ∼100% +41%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2298 - 2410, n=4)	2359 Points ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=425)	2004 Points ∼62% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	980 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points ∼45% +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points ∼19% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points ∼20% -55%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	434 Points ∼20% -56%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	383 Points ∼18% -61%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	829 Points ∼38% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points ∼85% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 990, n=4)	985 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=425)	1796 Points ∼83% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	493 Points ∼21% -57%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	457 Points ∼19% -60%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	958 Points ∼41% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points ∼100% +107%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points ∼84% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1126 - 1139, n=4)	1134 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=426)	1674 Points ∼71% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2348 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points ∼71% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points ∼49% -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	936 Points ∼28% -60%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1407 Points ∼43% -40%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2124 Points ∼64% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points ∼76% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2343 - 2399, n=4)	2371 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=455)	1915 Points ∼58% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1668 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points ∼50% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	701 Points ∼21% -58%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	644 Points ∼19% -61%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1233 Points ∼37% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points ∼100% +99%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points ∼86% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1663 - 1674, n=4)	1669 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=455)	2400 Points ∼72% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1778 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points ∼54% +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points ∼24% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	742 Points ∼22% -58%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	732 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1360 Points ∼41% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points ∼100% +86%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1778 - 1790, n=4)	1785 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=455)	2026 Points ∼61% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2408 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points ∼77% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points ∼49% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points ∼51% -32%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	897 Points ∼28% -63%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1371 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2378 Points ∼74% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points ∼78% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2408 - 2477, n=4)	2444 Points ∼76% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4909, n=505)	1911 Points ∼59% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	967 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points ∼46% -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points ∼18% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	257 Points ∼13% -73%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	288 Points ∼14% -70%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	710 Points ∼35% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points ∼85% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 979, n=4)	951 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=505)	1495 Points ∼74% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1114 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points ∼49% -3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points ∼20% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points ∼24% -53%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	305 Points ∼14% -73%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	349 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	841 Points ∼38% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points ∼100% +97%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points ∼84% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1128, n=4)	1100 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=506)	1442 Points ∼66% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2378 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points ∼76% +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points ∼51% -31%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	911 Points ∼28% -62%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1362 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2441 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2378 - 2471, n=4)	2428 Points ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=547)	1778 Points ∼55% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1607 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points ∼52% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	423 Points ∼13% -74%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	503 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	667 Points ∼21% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points ∼100% +98%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points ∼87% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1607 - 1651, n=4)	1627 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=546)	1966 Points ∼62% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1728 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points ∼56% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points ∼25% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	480 Points ∼15% -72%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	585 Points ∼18% -66%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	795 Points ∼25% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points ∼100% +85%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1728 - 1782, n=4)	1755 Points ∼55% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=549)	1704 Points ∼53% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	20354 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points ∼96% -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12075 Points ∼59% -41%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	9674 Points ∼48% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points ∼95% -5%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (18698 - 20354, n=4)	19488 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=704)	14394 Points ∼71% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	24654 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points ∼54% +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points ∼29% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11427 Points ∼25% -54%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10826 Points ∼23% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points ∼85% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (24654 - 25219, n=4)	24934 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=702)	22535 Points ∼48% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	23534 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points ∼67% +1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points ∼37% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11565 Points ∼33% -51%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10547 Points ∼30% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points ∼100% +51%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points ∼81% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (23253 - 23693, n=4)	23467 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=702)	18223 Points ∼51% -23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	36 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps ∼47% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps ∼30% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps ∼26% -44%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	19 fps ∼25% -47%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	39 fps ∼51% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps ∼100% +114%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps ∼84% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (36 - 36, n=3)	36 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=716)	38.7 fps ∼50% +8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps ∼90% +58%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps ∼59% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps ∼53% -6%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	26 fps ∼45% -21%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	36 fps ∼62% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps ∼100% +76%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps ∼98% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33 - 52, n=3)	39.7 fps ∼68% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=725)	28.5 fps ∼49% -14%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	19 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps ∼53% +5%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps ∼29% -42%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21 fps ∼55% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps ∼84% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=3)	19.7 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=621)	22.4 fps ∼59% +18%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	17 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps ∼53% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps ∼59% +18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	17 fps ∼50% 0%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19 fps ∼56% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps ∼91% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17 - 34, n=3)	23 fps ∼68% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=630)	19.7 fps ∼58% +16%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	13 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps ∼24% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps ∼24% -50%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6 fps ∼22% -54%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	14 fps ∼52% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps ∼85% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=3)	13 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=486)	18.2 fps ∼67% +40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	12 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps ∼100% +117%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps ∼54% +17%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 fps ∼38% -17%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	13 fps ∼50% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps ∼92% +100%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps ∼85% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (12 - 26, n=3)	16.7 fps ∼64% +39%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=488)	17 fps ∼65% +42%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	4.4 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps ∼93% +107%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps ∼40% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps ∼49% +9%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.1 fps ∼42% -7%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1.9 fps ∼19% -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps ∼43% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps ∼95% +111%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps ∼84% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4.4 - 9.1, n=4)	5.6 fps ∼57% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=217)	9.81 fps ∼100% +123%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2.8 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼41% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps ∼18% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps ∼21% -50%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps ∼21% -50%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1.2 fps ∼18% -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps ∼38% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps ∼90% +118%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps ∼74% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.8 - 2.8, n=4)	2.8 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=215)	6.78 fps ∼100% +142%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.2 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps ∼44% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps ∼52% +8%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.8 fps ∼45% -6%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3 fps ∼20% -58%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps ∼43% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps ∼87% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.2 - 15, n=4)	9.3 fps ∼62% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=221)	14.5 fps ∼97% +101%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.1 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps ∼52% +4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps ∼25% -51%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.7 fps ∼23% -54%
Gigaset GS195 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3.2 fps ∼20% -60%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps ∼43% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼99% +98%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps ∼87% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.1 - 8.4, n=4)	8.2 fps ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=221)	16.1 fps ∼100% +99%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.9 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps ∼44% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps ∼22% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps ∼26% -39%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2.8 fps ∼18% -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.7 fps ∼48% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼100% +132%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps ∼81% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=3)	7.07 fps ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=411)	12.3 fps ∼77% +78%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.1 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps ∼54% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps ∼66% +41%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3.9 fps ∼30% -36%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.8 fps ∼52% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps ∼92% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.1 - 13, n=3)	8.57 fps ∼66% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=415)	11.1 fps ∼85% +82%

Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11.99 fps ∼14% +46%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.41 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps ∼20% +105%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14.3 fps ∼17% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2)	10.1 fps ∼12% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (8.24 - 4528, n=67)	84.4 fps ∼100% +924%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼11%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	10.74 fps ∼17% +62%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.62 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps ∼22% +104%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12.1 fps ∼20% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2)	8.7 fps ∼14% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 2850, n=60)	62 fps ∼100% +832%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.16 fps ∼4% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps ∼16% +108%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps ∼14% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	7.44 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 4462, n=57)	95.9 fps ∼100% +1189%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Score ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1092 Score ∼48% -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	552 Score ∼24% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score ∼88% +76%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1681 Score ∼74% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2)	1113 Score ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 5025, n=64)	2267 Score ∼100% +100%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	937 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points ∼100% +49%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points ∼60% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1106 Points ∼79% +18%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points ∼73% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points ∼79% +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points ∼77% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=3)	1088 Points ∼78% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=651)	767 Points ∼55% -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1881 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points ∼53% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points ∼28% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	893 Points ∼25% -53%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	778 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1462 Points ∼41% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points ∼87% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1916, n=3)	1894 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=651)	2124 Points ∼60% +13%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2808 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points ∼68% +13%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points ∼28% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2008 Points ∼43% -28%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	661 Points ∼14% -76%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3096 Points ∼67% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points ∼100% +65%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points ∼63% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2808 - 3174, n=3)	2939 Points ∼63% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=651)	1571 Points ∼34% -44%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5006 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points ∼75% +2%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points ∼40% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3372 Points ∼50% -33%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2165 Points ∼32% -57%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5238 Points ∼77% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points ∼84% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5000 - 5089, n=3)	5032 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=651)	3061 Points ∼45% -39%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2254 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points ∼77% +13%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points ∼39% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1608 Points ∼48% -29%
LG K50 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	323 Points ∼10% -86%
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2220 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points ∼82% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2240 - 2556, n=3)	2350 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=651)	1535 Points ∼46% -32%

AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points ∼65% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	16684 Points ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (27535 - 27705, n=3)	27592 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6969 - 82947, n=36)	42058 Points ∼100% +53%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points ∼79% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	28689 Points ∼59% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (37857 - 38271, n=3)	38133 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (24176 - 100390, n=36)	48631 Points ∼100% +27%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points ∼39% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9335 Points ∼11% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33000 - 33527, n=3)	33176 Points ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5938 - 209164, n=36)	83953 Points ∼100% +154%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points ∼78% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	41127 Points ∼45% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (70133 - 70889, n=3)	70637 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (40620 - 168185, n=36)	90746 Points ∼100% +28%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points ∼64% 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	95835 Points ∼36% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (169222 - 169695, n=3)	169537 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (84645 - 534558, n=36)	265388 Points ∼100% +56%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=119)	36.1 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	30.692 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.65 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30.5 - 30.7, n=3)	30.6 Points ∼85% 0%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	30.008 Points ∼83% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.488 Points ∼60% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.921 Points ∼44% -48%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	51.061 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	51.046 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (49.8 - 51, n=3)	50.4 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	50.33 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=548)	42.6 Points ∼83% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	39.076 Points ∼77% -22%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	27.086 Points ∼53% -46%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	22.823 Points ∼45% -55%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=107)	39.8 runs/min ∼100% +29%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	33 runs/min ∼83% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.8 runs/min ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (29.5 - 30.8, n=3)	30.3 runs/min ∼76% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)	29.5 runs/min ∼74% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.63 runs/min ∼54% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	18.23 runs/min ∼46% -41%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=180)	67.2 Points ∼100% +29%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	62 Points ∼92% +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points ∼86% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (51 - 58, n=3)	53.7 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	52 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points ∼71% -8%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points ∼57% -27%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	26 Points ∼39% -50%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	9591 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	9405 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (9107 - 9405, n=3)	9257 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=709)	6951 Points ∼72% -26%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points ∼50% -49%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	4258 Points ∼44% -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)	12799.1 ms * ∼100% -181%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=734)	10398 ms * ∼81% -128%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768.3 ms * ∼76% -114%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546.4 ms * ∼43% -22%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	4852.6 ms * ∼38% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4583.8 ms * ∼36% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	4561.76 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4504 - 4584, n=3)	4550 ms * ∼36% -0%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	Xiaomi Mi A3	Nokia 4.2	Samsung Galaxy A20e	LG K50	Gigaset GS195	Honor 20 Lite	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		26%	-41%	-16%	-28%	-46%	-3%	-7%	-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 25%	64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 22%	58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18%	66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 27%	64.7 (52.8 - 73.5, n=15) 22%	49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=453) -6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%	79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	77.1 (71.6 - 85.9, n=15) 8%	68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=453) -5%
Random Write 4KB	91.23	117.4 29%	4.31 -95%	13.18 -86%	12.03 -87%	4.97 -95%	73.1 -20%	37.8 (8.48 - 127, n=17) -59%	24.2 (0.14 - 259, n=782) -73%
Random Read 4KB	84.76	126.9 50%	17.51 -79%	79.76 -6%	52.12 -39%	28.43 -66%	38.7 -54%	70.5 (20.7 - 108, n=17) -17%	49.6 (1.59 - 226, n=782) -41%
Sequential Write 256KB	160.53	184 15%	18.17 -89%	103.57 -35%	78.9 -51%	29.42 -82%	200.9 25%	172 (90 - 201, n=17) 7%	101 (2.99 - 590, n=782) -37%
Sequential Read 256KB	297.65	502.2 69%	220.39 -26%	300.36 1%	263.42 -12%	107.25 -64%	288.1 -3%	286 (144 - 499, n=17) -4%	283 (12.1 - 1781, n=782) -5%

PUBG Mobile

; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)

; Balanced: Ø24.7 (20-26)

Asphalt 9: Legends

; High Quality: Ø14.8 (9-23)

; Standard / low: Ø20.3 (12-31)

Dead Trigger 2

: Ø59.6 (49-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.9 °C	36.2 °C	33.5 °C
35.3 °C	35 °C	33.8 °C
35.2 °C	34.7 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C


32.6 °C	32.5 °C	35.3 °C
32.3 °C	32.4 °C	34.8 °C
31.8 °C	33.3 °C	34.5 °C

Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 26.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Ocioso	0.62 / 1.77 / 1.8 Watt
Carga	3.42 / 6.14 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-34%	-1%	14%	18%	-48%	-36%	-26%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	0.62	0.8 -29%	0.74 -19%	0.66 -6%	0.7 -13%	1 -61%	0.9 -45%	0.935 (0.62 - 1.7, n=4) -51%	0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=802) -42%
Idle Average *	1.77	2 -13%	1.9 -7%	1.63 8%	1 44%	2.1 -19%	1.6 10%	1.96 (1.77 - 2.3, n=4) -11%	1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=801) 2%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	3.3 -83%	2.21 -23%	1.67 7%	1.8 -0%	3.2 -78%	2.2 -22%	2.6 (1.8 - 3.5, n=4) -44%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=802) -13%
Load Average *	3.42	4.1 -20%	3.04 11%	2.77 19%	2.4 30%	4.7 -37%	6 -75%	3.91 (3.42 - 4.7, n=4) -14%	4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=796) -19%
Load Maximum *	6.14	7.7 -25%	4.15 32%	3.66 40%	4.5 27%	9 -47%	9.1 -48%	6.87 (6.14 - 7.7, n=4) -12%	5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=796) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		35h 39min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		13h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 37min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	LG K50 3500 mAh	Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	-16%	-11%	0%	6%	-17%
Reader / Idle	2139	1724 -19%		1432 -33%
H.264	859	1023 19%		753 -12%
WiFi v1.3	824	985 20%	696 -16%	715 -13%	822 0%	872 6%	685 -17%
Load	217	297 37%		250 15%

Pro

+ Painel IPS de alta qualidade

+ Dual SIM

+ Slots para cartão microSD

+ Conector de 3,5 mm

+ Alto-falante mono decente

+ Bem construído

+ Aparência premium

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Apenas BT 4.2?

- Armazenamento UFS restrito ao modelo Pro

- Sem banda LTE 20 ou Widevine L3 no modelo chinês

- Câmeras fracas no modelo carro-chefe

- Ergonomia

Veredicto - Um forte conceito geral

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone de sucesso da Xiaomi, que oferece muita energia para quem está com orçamento limitado. O hardware que a Xiaomi incluiu por cerca de 150 Euros (~US$ 165) é notável, embora tenha em mente que esse preço se aplica apenas à versão importada. O mesmo se aplica ao seu acabamento de alta qualidade e qualidade de construção, enquanto também somos fãs do seu grande painel IPS. Embora este último não ofereça a taxa de contraste de um painel OLED, ele usa o PWM para regular a luminosidade, o que é um bônus para aqueles que são sensíveis a esse tipo de oscilação.

A Xiaomi também não se comprometeu em nenhuma área, mas o modelo de 128 GB de armazenamento e 6 GB de RAM custa quase o mesmo que o Mi 9T ou o Mi 9 SE. Enquanto o Redmi Note 8 alcança seus irmãos Mi em muitas áreas, ele não pode competir com eles no desempenho da câmera.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 é um smartphone de nível básico triunfante. No entanto, certifique-se de comprar a versão correta.

Uma palavra sobre a compra de uma variante chinesa importada. Em primeiro lugar, você pode incorrer em despesas por trocas ou devoluções caras de garantia, algo que não ocorreria com um aparelho comprado na região local. Em segundo lugar, a versão chinesa do Redmi Note 8 só pode transmitir conteúdo protegido por DRM em definição padrão, uma desvantagem que não afeta o modelo europeu. Por fim, o modelo chinês não vem com Google Play Services pré-instalado, embora possam ser carregados depois. No entanto, poucos smartphones a 200 Euros (~ US$ 220) oferecem tanto quanto o Redmi Note 8, por isso recomendamos sinceramente que verifique a versão europeia se os problemas que afetam o modelo chinês forem um obstáculo para você.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - 2019-11-1211/12/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 66%

Peso

89%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

13 / 64 → 20%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 86 → 67%

Temperatura