Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Um sonho de tela para o comprador consciente dos preços
A surpresa da tela. O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone Xiaomi de nível básico, mas redefine a qualidade das telas que esperamos de dispositivos abaixo de 200 Euros (~US$ 220). O painel é brilhante, rico em contraste e até adequado para aqueles que são sensíveis ao PWM. O Redmi Note 8 não é somente boas notícias, como nossa unidade de teste estabelecerá.
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0
Device overview
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79% | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 665, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.3" | 2340x1080 | |
78% | 09/2019 | Xiaomi Mi A3 665, Adreno 610 | 173.8 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
81% | 04/2019 | Nokia 4.2 439, Adreno 505 | 161 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.71" | 1520x720 | |
76% | 07/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A20e 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2 | 141 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.8" | 1560x720 | |
76% | 10/2019 | LG K50 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.26" | 1520x720 | |
71% | 08/2019 | Gigaset GS195 SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322 | 180 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.18" | 2246x1080 | |
85% | 05/2019 | Honor 20 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 164 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.21" | 2340x1080 |
Size Comparison
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=461) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=461) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 |


|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1215:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3 | Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09 | Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71 | Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8 | LG K50 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Gigaset GS195 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -191% | -114% | -160% | -89% | -155% | -92% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 656 | 348 -47% | 445 -32% | 475 -28% | 489 -25% | 487 -26% | 455 -31% | 593 -10% |
Brightness | 643 | 355 -45% | 424 -34% | 473 -26% | 453 -30% | 507 -21% | 456 -29% | 587 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 91 -4% | 93 -2% | 85 -11% | 84 -12% | 94 -1% | 94 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.26 52% | 0.35 35% | 0.42 22% | 0.55 -2% | 0.58 -7% | ||
Contrast | 1215 | 1712 41% | 1357 12% | 1164 -4% | 885 -27% | 784 -35% | ||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.1 | 5.86 -433% | 5.9 -436% | 6.8 -518% | 4.75 -332% | 5.67 -415% | 4.43 -303% | 0.9 18% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 2.4 | 15.6 -550% | 9.3 -288% | 13.4 -458% | 7.75 -223% | 13.54 -464% | 6.81 -184% | 2 17% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 2.2 | 3.6 -64% | 6.8 -209% | 8.7 -295% | 4.6 -109% | 8.2 -273% | 5.4 -145% | 1.5 32% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.232 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.164 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.248 98% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6263 104% | 7051 92% | 8443 77% | 9385 69% | 7510 87% | 7569 86% | 7336 89% | 6548 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms). |
Geekbench 5 | |
OpenCL Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 370, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (183 - 4593, n=36) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1327 - 1379, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (807 - 3575, n=47) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (314 - 315, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (155 - 1344, n=47) |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5122 - 5144, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=328) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5366 - 5663, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=387) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=387) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6396 - 6534, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=399) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7446 - 8186, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=566) |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2250 - 2300, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 15735, n=76) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (898 - 908, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 14536, n=76) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1036 - 1049, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 14786, n=76) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2298 - 2387, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=406) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 987, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=406) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1126 - 1135, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=407) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2343 - 2393, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=435) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1668 - 1674, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=435) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1778 - 1790, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=435) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2408 - 2477, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4909, n=486) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (931 - 979, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=486) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1081 - 1128, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=487) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2378 - 2471, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=527) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1607 - 1651, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=526) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1728 - 1782, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=529) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (18698 - 20354, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=687) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (24654 - 25219, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=685) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (23253 - 23693, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=685) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (36 - 36, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=705) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33 - 52, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=714) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=610) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17 - 34, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=619) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=475) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (12 - 26, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=477) |
GFXBench | |
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.8 - 9.1, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=198) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.8 - 4.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=197) | |
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.2 - 15, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=202) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.1 - 8.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=202) | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=400) | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.1 - 13, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=404) |
Basemark GPU | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.24 - 4528, n=66) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 2850, n=59) | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 4462, n=56) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 5025, n=63) |
AnTuTu v8 | |
UX (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (27535 - 27705, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6969 - 78191, n=17) | |
MEM (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (37857 - 38271, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (24176 - 100390, n=17) | |
GPU (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33000 - 33527, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5938 - 199051, n=17) | |
CPU (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (70133 - 70889, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (40746 - 151146, n=17) | |
Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (169222 - 169695, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (84645 - 501784, n=17) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30.5 - 30.7, n=3) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (49.8 - 51, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=540) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=103) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (29.5 - 30.8, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=173) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (51 - 58, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (9107 - 9405, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=701) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) | |
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=726) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4504 - 4584, n=3) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | Xiaomi Mi A3 | Nokia 4.2 | Samsung Galaxy A20e | LG K50 | Gigaset GS195 | Honor 20 Lite | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 26% | -41% | -16% | -28% | -46% | -3% | -7% | -29% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 25% | 64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 22% | 58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11% | 62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18% | 66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 27% | 65 (52.8 - 73.5, n=14) 23% | 49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=437) -6% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21% | 79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11% | 78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10% | 80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13% | 75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6% | 77.1 (71.6 - 85.9, n=14) 8% | 67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=437) -5% |
Random Write 4KB | 91.23 | 117.4 29% | 4.31 -95% | 13.18 -86% | 12.03 -87% | 4.97 -95% | 73.1 -20% | 38.9 (8.48 - 127, n=16) -57% | 23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762) -75% |
Random Read 4KB | 84.76 | 126.9 50% | 17.51 -79% | 79.76 -6% | 52.12 -39% | 28.43 -66% | 38.7 -54% | 69.5 (20.7 - 108, n=16) -18% | 48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762) -43% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 160.53 | 184 15% | 18.17 -89% | 103.57 -35% | 78.9 -51% | 29.42 -82% | 200.9 25% | 171 (90 - 201, n=16) 7% | 99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762) -38% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 297.65 | 502.2 69% | 220.39 -26% | 300.36 1% | 263.42 -12% | 107.25 -64% | 288.1 -3% | 286 (144 - 499, n=16) -4% | 280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762) -6% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9: Legends
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
desligado | ![]() ![]() |
Ocioso | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Carga |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh | LG K50 3500 mAh | Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh | Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -1% | 14% | 18% | -48% | -36% | -35% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.8 -29% | 0.74 -19% | 0.66 -6% | 0.7 -13% | 1 -61% | 0.9 -45% | 1.04 (0.62 - 1.7, n=3) -68% | 0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=791) -42% |
Idle Average * | 1.77 | 2 -13% | 1.9 -7% | 1.63 8% | 1 44% | 2.1 -19% | 1.6 10% | 2.02 (1.77 - 2.3, n=3) -14% | 1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=790) 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 3.3 -83% | 2.21 -23% | 1.67 7% | 1.8 -0% | 3.2 -78% | 2.2 -22% | 2.87 (1.8 - 3.5, n=3) -59% | 2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=791) -13% |
Load Average * | 3.42 | 4.1 -20% | 3.04 11% | 2.77 19% | 2.4 30% | 4.7 -37% | 6 -75% | 4.07 (3.42 - 4.7, n=3) -19% | 4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=785) -19% |
Load Maximum * | 6.14 | 7.7 -25% | 4.15 32% | 3.66 40% | 4.5 27% | 9 -47% | 9.1 -48% | 7.11 (6.14 - 7.7, n=3) -16% | 5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=785) 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh | LG K50 3500 mAh | Gigaset GS195 4000 mAh | Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 14% | -16% | -11% | 0% | 6% | -17% | |
Reader / Idle | 2139 | 1724 -19% | 1432 -33% | ||||
H.264 | 859 | 1023 19% | 753 -12% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 824 | 985 20% | 696 -16% | 715 -13% | 822 0% | 872 6% | 685 -17% |
Load | 217 | 297 37% | 250 15% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um forte conceito geral
O Redmi Note 8 é outro smartphone de sucesso da Xiaomi, que oferece muita energia para quem está com orçamento limitado. O hardware que a Xiaomi incluiu por cerca de 150 Euros (~US$ 165) é notável, embora tenha em mente que esse preço se aplica apenas à versão importada. O mesmo se aplica ao seu acabamento de alta qualidade e qualidade de construção, enquanto também somos fãs do seu grande painel IPS. Embora este último não ofereça a taxa de contraste de um painel OLED, ele usa o PWM para regular a luminosidade, o que é um bônus para aqueles que são sensíveis a esse tipo de oscilação.
A Xiaomi também não se comprometeu em nenhuma área, mas o modelo de 128 GB de armazenamento e 6 GB de RAM custa quase o mesmo que o Mi 9T ou o Mi 9 SE. Enquanto o Redmi Note 8 alcança seus irmãos Mi em muitas áreas, ele não pode competir com eles no desempenho da câmera.
O Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 é um smartphone de nível básico triunfante. No entanto, certifique-se de comprar a versão correta.
Uma palavra sobre a compra de uma variante chinesa importada. Em primeiro lugar, você pode incorrer em despesas por trocas ou devoluções caras de garantia, algo que não ocorreria com um aparelho comprado na região local. Em segundo lugar, a versão chinesa do Redmi Note 8 só pode transmitir conteúdo protegido por DRM em definição padrão, uma desvantagem que não afeta o modelo europeu. Por fim, o modelo chinês não vem com Google Play Services pré-instalado, embora possam ser carregados depois. No entanto, poucos smartphones a 200 Euros (~ US$ 220) oferecem tanto quanto o Redmi Note 8, por isso recomendamos sinceramente que verifique a versão europeia se os problemas que afetam o modelo chinês forem um obstáculo para você.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - 11/12/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich