Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M31 – Médio com alguns destaques

A "M" de médio. Embora o Samsung Galaxy M31 não esteja disponível em todo o mundo, é uma alternativa interessante de gama média, com sua enorme bateria e sistema de quatro câmeras. No entanto, como você precisa viver com um armazenamento reduzido, o smartphone ainda vale a pena?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Galaxy M Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.4 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 64GB / 128GB, 49 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159.2 x 75.1
Bateria
6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth sharpness (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.482 W/​kg (head), 1.127 W/​kg (body); LTE speed: 600 Mbps (download), 150 Mbps (upload), fanless
peso
191 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g
Preço
270 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
07/2020
Samsung Galaxy M31
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A41
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
152 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.1"2400x1080
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.6"2400x1080
79 %
02/2020
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
159 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.15"2312x1080
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Galaxy M31

Size Comparison

165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g159.2 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 191 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g149.9 mm 69.8 mm 7.9 mm 152 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (min: 283, max: 670) MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (min: 349, max: 370) MBit/s ∼59% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
336 (min: 282, max: 350) MBit/s ∼54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (min: 145, max: 352) MBit/s ∼47% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼43% -21%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 (min: 80, max: 224) MBit/s ∼31% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (min: 465, max: 583) MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (min: 339, max: 355) MBit/s ∼63% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M31
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 258, max: 312) MBit/s ∼54%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (min: 137, max: 336) MBit/s ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼46% -15%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
224 (min: 197, max: 260) MBit/s ∼41% -25%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (282-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (258-312)
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – overview
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – overview
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – turn
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – turn
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – bridge
Samsung Galaxy M31 locating – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – overview
Garmin Edge 520 locating – turn
Garmin Edge 520 locating – turn
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge
Garmin Edge 520 locating – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
46.6 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
33 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31: 34.7 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 50.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31: 13.07 ∆E min: 3.76 - max: 24.83 ∆E
620
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 622 cd/m² Médio: 615.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 622 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.25 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
142% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.019
Samsung Galaxy M31
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A41
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
IPS, 2312x1080, 6.15
Screen
1%
11%
-69%
-48%
Brightness middle
622
554
-11%
610
-2%
442
-29%
507
-18%
Brightness
615
559
-9%
579
-6%
419
-32%
481
-22%
Brightness Distribution
97
92
-5%
92
-5%
90
-7%
88
-9%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.25
2
11%
1.8
20%
6.1
-171%
4.72
-110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.22
7.7
-24%
3
52%
9.7
-56%
7.84
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.6
41%
2.5
7%
5.9
-119%
5.5
-104%
Gamma
2.019 109%
2.11 104%
2.31 95%
2.35 94%
2.158 102%
CCT
6810 95%
6589 99%
6864 95%
7631 85%
7596 86%
Contrast
1649
1195
1334

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 208 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼91%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1605 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (387 - 3310, n=10)
1756 Points ∼100% +9%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1345 Points ∼79%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
1345 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 3382, n=10)
1697 Points ∼100% +26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1325 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1222 Points ∼61% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼89% +34%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼88% +33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1207 - 1325, n=2)
1266 Points ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼100% +50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
348 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
357 Points ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼100% +64%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 348, n=2)
347 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼100% +63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5587 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6742 Points ∼67% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6042 Points ∼60% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5351 - 5925, n=5)
5606 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=492)
5837 Points ∼58% +4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6202 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7594 Points ∼55% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼66% +47%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼100% +122%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7593 Points ∼55% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5886 - 6697, n=5)
6269 Points ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=650)
6377 Points ∼46% +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2163 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2281 Points ∼84% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼100% +26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼94% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2196 Points ∼81% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2061 - 2163, n=5)
2119 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=151)
2634 Points ∼97% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1442 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1005 Points ∼35% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼78% +56%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼78% +56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
796 Points ∼27% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1442, n=5)
1415 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=151)
2899 Points ∼100% +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1557 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1148 Points ∼44% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼90% +50%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼89% +49%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
927 Points ∼35% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1557, n=5)
1527 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=151)
2613 Points ∼100% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2332 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2427 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼100% +39%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼95% +32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2092 Points ∼65% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2058 - 2332, n=5)
2217 Points ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=498)
2175 Points ∼67% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1533 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1028 Points ∼40% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼99% +66%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼100% +67%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
838 Points ∼33% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1533, n=5)
1477 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=498)
2074 Points ∼81% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1659 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼44% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼100% +61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼100% +60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
967 Points ∼36% -42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1659, n=5)
1594 Points ∼60% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=499)
1926 Points ∼72% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2308 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2466 Points ∼76% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼100% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼97% +35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2084 Points ∼65% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2275 - 2336, n=4)
2301 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=528)
2085 Points ∼65% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1993 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points ∼39% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼99% +90%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼100% +92%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1261 Points ∼33% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1634 - 2021, n=4)
1910 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=528)
2763 Points ∼72% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2055 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼45% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼100% +77%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1382 Points ∼38% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1743 - 2074, n=4)
1983 Points ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=528)
2322 Points ∼64% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2258 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2296 Points ∼72% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼100% +40%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼97% +37%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2207 Points ∼70% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2080 - 2258, n=5)
2198 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=578)
2062 Points ∼65% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1478 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1016 Points ∼43% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼99% +59%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼100% +62%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
730 Points ∼31% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1478, n=5)
1415 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=578)
1734 Points ∼73% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1601 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1160 Points ∼46% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼99% +56%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼100% +57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
858 Points ∼34% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1601, n=5)
1535 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=579)
1658 Points ∼66% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2195 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2181 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼100% +49%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼94% +40%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2179 Points ∼67% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2195 - 2286, n=4)
2226 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=620)
1925 Points ∼59% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2020 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1093 Points ∼30% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼98% +79%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼100% +82%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
870 Points ∼24% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2048, n=4)
1891 Points ∼51% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=619)
2278 Points ∼62% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2056 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1229 Points ∼35% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼100% +72%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1004 Points ∼28% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2088, n=4)
1952 Points ∼55% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=622)
1963 Points ∼56% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20128 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17231 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼100% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (19797 - 20393, n=4)
20109 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=768)
15261 Points ∼76% -24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
25160 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22232 Points ∼41% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼97% +106%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼100% +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25625, n=4)
22961 Points ∼43% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=766)
25927 Points ∼48% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
23836 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20885 Points ∼55% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼100% +61%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼89% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 24052, n=4)
22123 Points ∼58% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=766)
20383 Points ∼53% -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
36 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps ∼46% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼100% +136%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼100% +136%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
33 fps ∼39% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (36 - 48, n=5)
42.2 fps ∼50% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼52% +22%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
37 fps ∼62% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +88%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼52% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (32 - 44, n=5)
38 fps ∼63% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼51% -5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps ∼51% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +128%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼100% +128%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼44% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (18 - 26, n=5)
21.6 fps ∼53% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼63% +44%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼51% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼100% +105%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼97% +100%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼41% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 24, n=5)
21 fps ∼54% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼56% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
16 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼43% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +88%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼100% +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼40% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 16, n=5)
15.4 fps ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼69% +30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
14 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼45% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +107%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼93% +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼38% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼66% +36%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5.7 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.9 fps ∼44% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼98% +93%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼98% +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4.2 fps ∼38% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=5)
6.18 fps ∼55% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼100% +96%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3.6 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼86% +92%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼87% +94%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.6 fps ∼32% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=5)
3.56 fps ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼100% +123%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.4 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼44% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +81%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼38% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.7, n=5)
9.28 fps ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼98% +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼39% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼93% +80%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼98% +90%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.9 fps ∼36% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.8 - 10, n=5)
9.96 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼100% +93%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼45% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +80%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼100% +80%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼36% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.6 - 10, n=5)
9.92 fps ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼78% +40%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9.1 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps ∼45% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +87%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼94% +76%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.3 fps ∼43% -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.6 - 9.6, n=5)
9.06 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼74% +37%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
187087 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
157473 Points ∼50% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼86% +45%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼88% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
185725 Points ∼59% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (174870 - 187087, n=5)
179222 Points ∼57% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼100% +68%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1062 Points ∼86% +10520%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼99% +12160%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼100% +12230%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
998 Points ∼81% +9880%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=5)
451 Points ∼37% +4410%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼66% +7980%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2168 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1113 Points ∼30% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼100% +73%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼100% +74%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1466 Points ∼39% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=5)
2153 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼65% +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1775 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2148 Points ∼47% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼97% +151%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼100% +158%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2993 Points ∼65% +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1605 - 2122, n=5)
1778 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼40% +2%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4699 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5142 Points ∼74% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼99% +46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4909 Points ∼71% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (4029 - 4978, n=5)
4620 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼49% -28%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
649 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1901 Points ∼55% +193%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼99% +431%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼100% +436%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2153 Points ∼62% +232%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=5)
1234 Points ∼35% +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼49% +165%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼100% +72%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼84% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
32.643 Points ∼68% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.333 Points ∼65% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 28.7, n=5)
27.9 Points ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
27.807 Points ∼58%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼97% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
55.972 Points ∼62% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
50.919 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=5)
50.4 Points ∼56% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
47.5 Points ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=601)
46.4 Points ∼52% -2%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼100% +54%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=156)
43.1 runs/min ∼95% +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.4 runs/min ∼69% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)
29.4 runs/min ∼65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29 - 30.5, n=5)
29.4 runs/min ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
27.8 runs/min ∼62% -5%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼100% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼98% +25%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼94% +20%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
56 Points ∼79%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=5)
52.6 Points ∼74% -6%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
52 Points ∼73% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
52 Points ∼73% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼100% +65%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼99% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
10499 Points ∼61% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
10434 Points ∼60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
9549 Points ∼55% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10434, n=5)
9434 Points ∼55% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼45% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -106%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=5)
4916 ms * ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)
4786.2 ms * ∼48%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
4317.8 ms * ∼44% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)
3778.9 ms * ∼38% +21%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼31% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼29% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy M31Samsung Galaxy A41Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Prorealme 6 ProHuawei P30 Lite New EditionAverage 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-10%
7%
37%
-16%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
55.3 (33.3 - 65.3, n=9)
-9%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
76.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.2 (36.8 - 85.4, n=9)
-2%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
152.4
72.53
-52%
112.93
-26%
154
1%
171.6
13%
71.8 (13.6 - 196, n=13)
-53%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
128.9
84
-35%
122.58
-5%
158.66
23%
198.7
54%
113 (60.6 - 157, n=13)
-12%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
221.7
211.05
-5%
171.09
-23%
203.28
-8%
391.1
76%
180 (135 - 222, n=13)
-19%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
489.5
299.89
-39%
498.15
2%
512.61
5%
800.3
63%
489 (272 - 687, n=13)
0%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-33%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø55 (40-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø32.4 (19-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø26.6 (10-32)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29 (15-31)
Carga Máxima
 43.6 °C37.9 °C35 °C 
 42.9 °C37.9 °C35.4 °C 
 41.2 °C36.4 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
33.5 °C36.8 °C41.7 °C
34.6 °C36.5 °C42.7 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C41.3 °C
Máximo: 42.7 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.12539.940.83131.935.14038.934.15043.736.66329.835.38025.925.910026.326.312524.925.516021.627.42001934.925018.942.631518.149.440016.654.950016.256.763014.960.88001565.7100015.671.8125014.973.7160014.972200015.673.8250014.670.4315014.268.3400014.166.4500014.460.8630014.662.7800014.966.91000015.272.41250015.464.41600015.749.2SPL6470.627.581.7N15.825.3147.9median 15.4median 62.7Delta2.111.345.846.541.439.431.232.33635.935.638.53132.42624.623.724.521.724.919.133.318.244.417.147.615.654.115.356.316.157.81461.313.664.31469.113.671.414.870.914.473.614.670.713.764.913.86414.168.114.37014.664.71561.915.357.515.753.866.864.865.526.680.820.116.518.50.846median 14.8median 61.91.710.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M31Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 3.7 Watt
Carga midlight 6.7 / 9.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
46%
35%
30%
28%
16%
38%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.96
40%
0.75
53%
0.92
42%
0.95
41%
1.122 (0.9 - 1.6, n=5)
30%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
45%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.57
32%
2.19
5%
1.79
22%
2.1
9%
2.39 (1.7 - 4.24, n=5)
-4%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
24%
Idle Maximum *
3.7
1.61
56%
2.24
39%
1.88
49%
2.4
35%
2.91 (1.8 - 4.34, n=5)
21%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
45%
Load Average *
6.7
2.93
56%
3.88
42%
5.41
19%
4.2
37%
5.86 (5 - 6.99, n=5)
13%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
39%
Load Maximum *
9.4
4.97
47%
5.97
36%
7.59
19%
7.7
18%
7.6 (6.3 - 9.4, n=5)
19%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
40h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
22h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 26min
Samsung Galaxy M31
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A41
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
-31%
-12%
-22%
-42%
Reader / Idle
2456
1843
-25%
2336
-5%
1359
-45%
H.264
1432
998
-30%
1096
-23%
802
-44%
WiFi v1.3
1324
650
-51%
1175
-11%
1031
-22%
719
-46%
Load
326
268
-18%
303
-7%
223
-32%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta
+ Navegação precisa
+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Slot microSD dedicado
+ Software moderno
+ Muitas frequências LTE
+ Boas fotos da câmera
+ Tela brilhante

Contra

- Desempenho relativamente lento
- Muito bloatware
- Afogamentos sob uso estendido
- Engasgos durante gravações de vídeo em UHD
- Alto consumo de energia

Veredicto - Muito agradável em geral

Testing the Samsung Galaxy M31
Testing the Samsung Galaxy M31

Relativamente rápido, após o seu lançamento, o Samsung Galaxy M31 já está disponível a preços ainda mais acessíveis. Isso também o torna mais atraente, pois o smartphone se mostra bastante médio em termos de equipamento de hardware. Os destaques são a enorme bateria e a tela AMOLED que oferece uma precisão de cores relativamente boa.

Por outro lado, o armazenamento está apenas no nível de sua classe e, em termos de desempenho, o Galaxy M31 ainda permanece significativamente atrás dos concorrentes na faixa de preço do preço de varejo recomendado. Além disso, você precisa conviver com um forte afogamento sob carga, bem como com um aquecimento muito notável. O Galaxy M31 também não consegue avançar em termos de velocidade de WLAN.

Embora tecnicamente, o Galaxy M31 seja mediano em muitas áreas, convence com uma bateria de longa duração e uma boa tela.

Portanto, em muitas áreas, o smartphone Galaxy é mais um telefone comum, do que capaz de se destacar. No entanto, como sua duração de bateria é convincente, a tela é brilhante, as câmeras tiram fotos decentes e a Samsung oferece um software moderno e claramente organizado com o OneUI, que também é atualizado com segurança, o Galaxy M31 ainda é um smartphone atraente no mercado de gama média.

Samsung Galaxy M31 - 07/08/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 66%
Peso
89%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 64 → 27%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 86 → 59%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
61%
Médio
73%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M31 – Médio com alguns destaques
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-24 (Update: 2020-07-27)