Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 10

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/22/2019

Cinema de bolso. A Sony está tentando abrir novos caminhos no mercado de smartphones com novos dispositivos Xperia. O Xperia 10 é a última tentativa da empresa para quebrar o setor de gama média, e equipou o smartphone com um SoC Snapdragon 630 e uma tela de 6 polegadas com uma relação de aspecto de 21:9. O último permite que o dispositivo mantenha seu formato no mínimo e ainda tenha uma tela grande. Leia esta análise para ver como o Xperia 10 se desempenha em nossos testes e como ele se compara com seus concorrentes de gama média.

Sony Xperia 10 (Xperia Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
3072 MB 
, 3 GB
Pantalha
6 polegadas 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 457 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva multi-touch, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.8 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, LED de notificação, rádio FM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B32, B38., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 156 x 68
Bateria
2870 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0, 27 mm, 1/3", 1.12 μm. 5MP wide-angle sensor, f/2.4, 22 mm, 1/4", 1.4 μm. Camera2 API Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, fones, Sony UI, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: 1.31 W/kg – Body, 0.9 W/kg – Head. LTE Cat.12: 600 Mbps/100 Mbps. DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 44 g
Preço
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10

Size Comparison

161.4 mm 76.9 mm 7.9 mm 178 g159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼73% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼52% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=413)
224 MBit/s ∼33% -33%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 94, max: 118) MBit/s ∼17% -66%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 42, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -84%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +156%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼66% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼49% +26%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +19%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=413)
213 MBit/s ∼33% -16%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 107, max: 117) MBit/s ∼17% -56%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 (min: 18, max: 66) MBit/s ∼7% -83%
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a tight corner
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a tight corner
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Overview
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Overview
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Taking a tight corner
GPS Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Taking a tight corner
Standard photo
Standard photo
Bokeh mode
Bokeh mode
HDR
HDR
Default camera app: Photo modes
Default camera app: Photo modes
Default camera app: Viewfinder
Default camera app: Viewfinder
Default camera app: Photo options
Default camera app: Photo options
Default camera app: Manual mode
Default camera app: Manual mode
Default camera app: Video mode
Default camera app: Video mode
Default camera app: Video settings
Default camera app: Video settings

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
516
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 548 cd/m² Médio: 525.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
TFT, 1480x720, 6
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Screen
-15%
-10%
-11%
18%
4%
0%
36%
Brightness middle
547
471
-14%
567
4%
512
-6%
541
-1%
489
-11%
430
-21%
570
4%
Brightness
525
453
-14%
547
4%
508
-3%
540
3%
486
-7%
434
-17%
565
8%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
92
-1%
95
2%
91
-2%
93
0%
94
1%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.36
0.5
-39%
0.61
-69%
0.28
22%
0.33
8%
0.34
6%
Contrast
1519
942
-38%
930
-39%
1829
20%
1639
8%
1438
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.5
-20%
4.39
5%
5.6
-22%
2.7
41%
3.8
17%
5.09
-11%
1.5
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.1
7.95
34%
7.28
40%
11.8
2%
4.6
62%
7.1
41%
8.05
33%
3.6
70%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
5
-28%
4.9
-26%
8
-105%
3.1
21%
4.4
-13%
3.3
15%
1.2
69%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.326 95%
2.248 98%
2.14 103%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.257 97%
2.07 106%
CCT
7158 91%
7654 85%
7642 85%
7831 83%
6853 95%
7213 90%
7026 93%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2336 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9461 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, custom white balance
CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, standard white balance
CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Colour Accuracy – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Colour Space – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Grayscale – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance
CalMAN: Colour Saturation – sRGB target colour space, vivid white balance

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28.4 ms rise
↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4006 Points ∼28% +6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +81%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1411 Points ∼10% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼39% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +282%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼93% +255%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼28% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2910 - 3956, n=12)
3718 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=310)
4584 Points ∼32% +22%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼52% +20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1801 Points ∼20% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼64% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +130%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼97% +123%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼48% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2246 - 4234, n=13)
4009 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=365)
4570 Points ∼50% +15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼51% +50%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +115%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
644 Points ∼26% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼66% +96%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +195%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼98% +190%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼62% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (710 - 885, n=13)
853 Points ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=367)
1365 Points ∼55% +63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼75% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
3243 Points ∼40% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼76% +3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼99% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼66% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4636 - 5987, n=12)
4968 Points ∼61% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=359)
5004 Points ∼62% -16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼74% +45%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼86% +68%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
4088 Points ∼42% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼71% +39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼58% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4948 - 6264, n=13)
5632 Points ∼58% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=527)
5476 Points ∼57% +11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
2167 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 15735, n=46)
2388 Points ∼100% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
693 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 14536, n=46)
2410 Points ∼100% +248%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
861 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 14786, n=49)
2084 Points ∼100% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼80% +33%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼92% +52%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼82% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼80% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼67% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1664 - 1778, n=13)
1710 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=374)
1832 Points ∼66% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼10% -41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% +133%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼28% +59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼100% +465%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼14% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (767 - 809, n=13)
797 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=374)
1597 Points ∼36% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼24%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼15% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼54% +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼39% +60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +309%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼99% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼20% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (872 - 919, n=13)
904 Points ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=377)
1484 Points ∼40% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼78% +27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼89% +45%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
896 Points ∼32% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼98% +60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼77% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼66% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1657 - 1819, n=13)
1731 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=388)
1807 Points ∼64% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼12% -38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼41% +120%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
250 Points ∼4% -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼29% +54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼100% +431%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼77% +310%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼14% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1204 - 1332, n=13)
1302 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=388)
2194 Points ∼32% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼18% -32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼53% +102%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
298 Points ∼6% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼40% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼100% +280%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼77% +193%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼20% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1299 - 1415, n=13)
1379 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=389)
1861 Points ∼36% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼83% +37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼93% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼93% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼79% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼67% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1631 - 1822, n=13)
1734 Points ∼64% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=450)
1762 Points ∼65% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼9% -40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼25% +69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +574%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼84% +470%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼13% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (704 - 729, n=13)
718 Points ∼15% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=452)
1324 Points ∼28% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼13% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +127%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼34% +68%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼84% +315%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼19% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (809 - 839, n=13)
825 Points ∼21% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=460)
1262 Points ∼32% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼80% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼87% +46%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
899 Points ∼32% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼96% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼75% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼65% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1687 - 1816, n=13)
1746 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=482)
1669 Points ∼59% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼9% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
54 Points ∼1% -96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼23% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +569%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼76% +406%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼10% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1234 - 1289, n=13)
1258 Points ∼15% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=482)
1802 Points ∼22% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼16% -31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼47% +105%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
68 Points ∼1% -95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼36% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼100% +332%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼77% +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼17% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1315 - 1374, n=13)
1341 Points ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=490)
1543 Points ∼27% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼48% +34%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42% +19%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
10416 Points ∼30% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼55% +53%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼80% +124%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼40% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (12437 - 13217, n=13)
12963 Points ∼37% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=642)
13649 Points ∼39% +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼18% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼48% +122%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5447 Points ∼7% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼36% +65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼100% +359%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼94% +332%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼19% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (16508 - 18635, n=13)
18279 Points ∼22% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11358 - 162695, n=642)
20023 Points ∼24% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼24% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +77%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
6093 Points ∼10% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼42% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +288%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼88% +240%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼24% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (15466 - 17032, n=13)
16750 Points ∼27% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=643)
16599 Points ∼26% +2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼16% -17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
7.6 fps ∼5% -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼34% +76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +417%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼80% +314%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (29 - 30, n=13)
29.7 fps ∼20% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=671)
35.1 fps ∼23% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼38% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +128%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
13 fps ∼22% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼73% +76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (25 - 31, n=13)
29.2 fps ∼49% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=674)
27 fps ∼45% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼45% +146%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
2.8 fps ∼4% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼32% +77%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +446%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼94% +415%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (13 - 14, n=13)
13.8 fps ∼19% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=590)
19.4 fps ∼27% +49%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼17% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5.5 fps ∼9% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼34% +82%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +427%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼97% +409%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (11 - 15, n=13)
13.8 fps ∼24% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=595)
17.8 fps ∼31% +62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼15% -27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼49% +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼32% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +268%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +395%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.2 - 10, n=13)
9.38 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=451)
16 fps ∼34% +68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼14%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼12% -17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼24% +67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +592%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼83% +477%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.3 - 11, n=13)
9.36 fps ∼17% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=454)
15.2 fps ∼28% +95%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼9% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +204%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼22% +78%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +715%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +715%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2.7 - 3.2, n=4)
3.03 fps ∼14% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=154)
8.97 fps ∼41% +232%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼12%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼9% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +194%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼23% +88%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +724%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +724%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1.7 - 1.9, n=4)
1.825 fps ∼13% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=154)
6.24 fps ∼45% +267%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼13%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼10% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼22% +73%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼89% +605%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +695%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.4 - 5.4, n=4)
5.05 fps ∼14% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=156)
13.5 fps ∼39% +207%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼14%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼11% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼41% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼26% +78%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼94% +553%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +594%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.9 - 5.6, n=4)
5.28 fps ∼16% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=155)
15 fps ∼44% +206%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼11% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +145%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼26% +72%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +560%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +391%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)
5.48 fps ∼16% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=380)
10.8 fps ∼31% +104%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼13%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼11% -16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +179%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼24% +81%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +667%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼85% +551%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.3 - 6, n=13)
5.48 fps ∼17% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=384)
9.67 fps ∼29% +125%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
108408 Points ∼41% +23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼64% +92%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
41483 Points ∼16% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼54% +62%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼100% +198%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼47% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (87300 - 90674, n=11)
89396 Points ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=272)
130479 Points ∼50% +48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼78% +24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼83% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
685 Points ∼53% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼84% +33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼84% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (666 - 936, n=13)
859 Points ∼66% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=602)
742 Points ∼57% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼14% -24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
446 Points ∼6% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼29% +64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99% +460%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1409 - 1523, n=13)
1494 Points ∼19% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=602)
1943 Points ∼24% +38%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼60% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼90% +200%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
643 Points ∼20% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼72% +137%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼99% +230%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼100% +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼75% +149%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (838 - 1405, n=13)
1199 Points ∼37% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=602)
1449 Points ∼44% +47%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼66% +39%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼86% +80%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1239 Points ∼19% -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼78% +63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼98% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼100% +110%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼68% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1763 - 3319, n=13)
3147 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=602)
2857 Points ∼43% -10%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼45% +27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼71% +99%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
702 Points ∼18% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼61% +70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼100% +179%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼100% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼52% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1152 - 1570, n=13)
1479 Points ∼38% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=606)
1420 Points ∼37% +3%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.5 - 108, n=81)
30.6 Points ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
16.3 Points ∼53% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼53%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼87% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=134)
63.4 Points ∼76% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
61 Points ∼73% +56%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼70% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼69% +46%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (35 - 39, n=5)
37.6 Points ∼45% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
25 Points ∼30% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼100% +210%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼96% +198%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼84% +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼71% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼61% +88%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼55% +72%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=663)
6281 Points ∼42% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)
4963 Points ∼33% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
3374 Points ∼22% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
13548.5 ms * ∼100% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=683)
10792 ms * ∼80% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)
9702 ms * ∼72% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼36% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼30% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼29% +62%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼22% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼21% +73%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼20% +74%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia 10Motorola Moto G7Nokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018Xiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi 8Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
78%
-6%
-9%
9%
41%
86%
2%
3%
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
61.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-12%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=405)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
76.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-11%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=405)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
14.39
75.6
425%
7.3
-49%
12.71
-12%
16.06
12%
17.81
24%
21
46%
15.45
7%
24.2 (3.4 - 88.2, n=110)
68%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=712)
40%
Random Read 4KB
53.12
69.3
30%
69.9
32%
64.64
22%
82.94
56%
101.01
90%
136.3
157%
83.98
58%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=110)
2%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=712)
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
232.87
216
-7%
203.8
-12%
95.57
-59%
204.72
-12%
155.57
-33%
207.8
-11%
104.87
-55%
172 (40 - 246, n=110)
-26%
92.2 (2.99 - 503, n=712)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.8
297
8%
279.3
2%
292.87
7%
283.36
3%
705.38
158%
693.2
153%
295.76
8%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=110)
-1%
259 (12.1 - 1468, n=712)
-5%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
: Ø24.7 (17-26)
Asphalt Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø24.5 (19-30)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (24-31)
Carga Máxima
 37.7 °C36.1 °C30.1 °C 
 38.6 °C33.2 °C28.9 °C 
 35 °C32.5 °C29.3 °C 
Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
27.9 °C30.8 °C36.4 °C
27.6 °C29.4 °C36.6 °C
28.1 °C29.8 °C34.6 °C
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.62527.832.33124.125.24024.922.25033.336.26323.8278026.228.210026.229.712517.422.716017.231.520017.336.725016.44831516.255.840015.759.350014.664.763016.369.780013.472.4100013.872125014.371.7160013.874.1200014.372.8250014.673.6315013.776.8400014.578500014.476630014.374.8800014.671.81000014.669.61250014.561.81600014.846.6SPL26.786N0.864.6median 14.6median 69.7Delta1.412.638.735.637.138.733.733.337.433.436.336.828.329.923.726.423.224.12230.520.442.218.445.417.75017.354.817.759.218.161.62066.216.367.115.57514.17714.174.614.571.714.366.51565.214.765.816.965.815.369.21573.614.573.214.758.214.555.96727.983.419.4154.5median 15.5median 65.82.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 10Motorola Moto G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.16 / 2.17 Watt
Carga midlight 3.32 / 5.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
8%
-5%
-15%
-14%
-64%
-7%
-1%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
1.1
-53%
0.8
-11%
0.64
11%
0.61
15%
0.65
10%
1.5
-108%
0.71
1%
0.732 (0.35 - 1.4, n=13)
-2%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=747)
-22%
Idle Average *
2.16
1.8
17%
1.5
31%
1.81
16%
1.95
10%
1.97
9%
2.2
-2%
1.36
37%
1.835 (1 - 2.31, n=13)
15%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=746)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
2.6
-20%
1.8
17%
1.91
12%
2.03
6%
2.01
7%
2.6
-20%
1.47
32%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=13)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=747)
7%
Load Average *
3.32
4.2
-27%
3.2
4%
4.88
-47%
4.56
-37%
4.29
-29%
6.1
-84%
5.13
-55%
3.81 (2.82 - 6.2, n=13)
-15%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=741)
-22%
Load Maximum *
5.34
6.8
-27%
5.4
-1%
6.38
-19%
9.15
-71%
9.05
-69%
10.9
-104%
7.89
-48%
5.62 (4.56 - 8, n=13)
-5%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=741)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 53min
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
37%
40%
50%
51%
34%
28%
Reader / Idle
1006
1548
54%
1682
67%
2080
107%
1950
94%
2088
108%
1634
62%
1467
46%
H.264
620
819
32%
857
38%
706
14%
940
52%
936
51%
897
45%
836
35%
WiFi v1.3
541
798
48%
738
36%
651
20%
768
42%
808
49%
736
36%
605
12%
Load
233
219
-6%
246
6%
272
17%
259
11%
220
-6%
215
-8%
273
17%

Pro

+ Tela IPS brilhante
+ Razão alta de contraste
+ Bem construído
+ NFC
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ Bom sensor de digitais
+ Conector para fones

Contra

- SoC bastante lento
- Armazenamento eMMC
- Traseira de plástico
- Câmeras decepcionantes
- Apenas 3 GB de RAM
The Sony Xperia 10 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Sony Germany.
The Sony Xperia 10 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Sony Germany.

O Sony Xperia 10 é uma proposta intrigante. Ele será atraente para aqueles que são fanáticos de smartphones compactos, porque sua relação de aspecto de 21:9 permite que seja visivelmente mais estreito que seus concorrentes.

No entanto, seu painel IPS alongado tem suas desvantagens. Nossa unidade de análise é muito pesada e muitos aplicativos não suportam atualmente 21: 9, então você fica vendo o conteúdo em 16: 9. Aplicativos como o YouTube podem aumentar o zoom na maioria dos conteúdos, mas você acaba vendo uma imagem ou um vídeo muito recortado. Em suma, ter uma relação de aspecto de 21:9 poderia ser útil, mas é pouco prático no momento.

A Sony deu um passo na direção certa com sua nova série Xperia. O Xperia 10 é um smartphone de gama média peculiar e decente, mas o seu SoC desatualizado o torna atualmente muito caro, em nossa opinião.

Apesar de tudo, é um prazer usar a tela e é brilhante o suficiente para todos os ambientes. Da mesma forma, oferece cores precisas e é rica em contraste, de modo que o conteúdo se vê vibrante. Nossa unidade de teste é bem feita também, e recebemos com agrado a inclusão de um conector para fones, juntamente com a capacidade de ajustar o áudio para uma qualidade alta.

No entanto, seu armazenamento interno, RAM e SoC são mais adequados para um dispositivo de 250 euros (~$282) e não para 350 euros (~$395). Também não somos fanáticos da carcaça de plástico, embora seja mais resistente do que uma de metal ou de vidro. No geral, o Sony Xperia 10 é um smartphone decente, mas teria sido ainda mais atraente se fosse cerca de 100 Euros (~$113) mais barato.

Sony Xperia 10 - 04/15/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
46 / 60 → 76%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
40 / 63 → 64%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
65%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 10
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-25)