Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - Telefone de gama média com uma tela HDR AMOLED e >1000 nits

Ainda é um assassino de carros-chefes? O telefone Poco deste ano mais uma vez oferece especificações de hardware muito competitivas, incluindo a tela AMOLED muito brilhante e com cores precisas, por um preço barato. Medimos um brilho acima de 1080 nits no telefone de gama média. Nossa análise mostrará se o smartphone 5G barato vale o preço pedido de 440 Euros (~US$ 516).
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Pocophone F Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, ou 256 GB UFS 3.1, 107 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola digital, sensor hall effect, barômetro, sensor de flickering, USB-C, emissor IV, IP 58, Miracast, status LED
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: Sub6G: n77/n78; 4G: FDD-LTE 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28, TDD-LTE 38/40/41; 3G: WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8, EVDO BC0; 2G: GSM B2/B3/B5/B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 163.3 x 75.4
Bateria
4700 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.9, 26 mm, 1/1.72", 0.8 µm) + 13 MP (f/2.4, 123˚, 1.12µm) + 5 MP (f/2.2, 50mm) + 2 MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8 µm, pop-up
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Onscreen, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, ferramenta SIM, guia do usuário, cartão de garantia, MiUI for Poco (MiUI 11), 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, SAR: 0.79 W/kg (head), 1.03 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
219 g, Suprimento de energia: 86 g
Preço
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
219 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85 %
06/2020
LG Velvet
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.8"2460x1080
86 %
06/2020
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
84 %
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
85 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
SD 865, Adreno 650
222 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro smartphone review

Size Comparison

168.7 mm 77.3 mm 10.4 mm 222 g168.56 mm 78 mm 9.75 mm 218 g167.08 mm 74 mm 7.85 mm 180 g163.3 mm 75.4 mm 8.9 mm 219 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (min: 911, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +23%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (min: 888, max: 928) MBit/s ∼97% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (min: 881, max: 916) MBit/s ∼95% +17%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
770 (min: 741, max: 794) MBit/s ∼81%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (min: 656, max: 691) MBit/s ∼72% -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (min: 601, max: 733) MBit/s ∼72% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼28% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (min: 463, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
923 (min: 783, max: 956) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (min: 440, max: 907) MBit/s ∼94% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
859 (min: 755, max: 907) MBit/s ∼93%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (min: 414, max: 930) MBit/s ∼92% -1%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (min: 310, max: 644) MBit/s ∼67% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø769 (741-794)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø859 (755-907)
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Poco F2 Pro
Poco F2 Pro
Poco F2 Pro
Poco F2 Pro
Poco F2 Pro
Poco F2 Pro
Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Wide angle
Wide angle
2x zoom
2x zoom
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraLowLightUltraweitwinkelHauptkamera
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
45 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
30 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: 38.85 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 60.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro: 7.14 ∆E min: 0.91 - max: 15.01 ∆E
805
cd/m²
787
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
813
cd/m²
804
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 813 cd/m² Médio: 800.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.22 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 799 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.237
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
LG Velvet
P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.8
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-41%
-52%
13%
-188%
-57%
Brightness middle
799
586
-27%
679
-15%
786
-2%
593
-26%
619
-23%
Brightness
801
587
-27%
690
-14%
791
-1%
601
-25%
616
-23%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
97
0%
96
-1%
92
-5%
90
-7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.46
2.8
-92%
3.2
-119%
1.1
25%
8.1
-455%
3.74
-156%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.92
6.3
-116%
6.2
-112%
2.2
25%
16.2
-455%
7.94
-172%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
2.3
15%
4.1
-52%
1.8
33%
7.1
-163%
1.7
37%
Gamma
2.237 98%
2.01 109%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.188 101%
CCT
6003 108%
6827 95%
6604 98%
6315 103%
7566 86%
6662 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 177.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 177.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 177.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3059 Points ∼90%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1187 Points ∼35% -61%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3382 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3059 - 3382, n=2)
3221 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 3382, n=10)
1697 Points ∼50% -45%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼78%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2487 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼50%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼92%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2954 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼57%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3399 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1797 Points ∼52% -47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼90% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼96% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3449 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=10)
3312 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼58% -41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
923 Points ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
554 Points ∼60% -40%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
924 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (903 - 924, n=10)
913 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼61% -38%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9548 Points ∼98%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9576 Points ∼98% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9739 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9443 - 9739, n=5)
9559 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=352)
4861 Points ∼50% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
13569 Points ∼100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13589 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13356 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (13186 - 13589, n=5)
13396 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=414)
4962 Points ∼37% -63%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4284 Points ∼100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4304 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4276 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4261 - 4304, n=5)
4281 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=414)
1513 Points ∼35% -65%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10347 Points ∼78%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7808 Points ∼59% -25%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼80% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points ∼98% +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9822 Points ∼74% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9822 - 13202, n=11)
11312 Points ∼86% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=492)
5837 Points ∼44% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12129 Points ∼62%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9154 Points ∼46% -25%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼60% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points ∼71% +15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12612 Points ∼64% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11839 - 19711, n=10)
13515 Points ∼69% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=650)
6377 Points ∼32% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3193 Points ∼81%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼54% -33%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼85% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3793 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3193 - 3947, n=8)
3699 Points ∼94% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=151)
2634 Points ∼67% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8265 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3193 Points ∼38% -61%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8321 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8076 - 8321, n=8)
8231 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=151)
2899 Points ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6106 Points ∼92%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2877 Points ∼43% -53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼93% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6590 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6106 - 6644, n=9)
6479 Points ∼98% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=151)
2613 Points ∼39% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5466 Points ∼95%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1898 Points ∼33% -65%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼90% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5780 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5780, n=9)
5429 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=498)
2175 Points ∼38% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9466 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3547 Points ∼37% -63%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9467 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9157 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9157 - 9567, n=9)
9408 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=498)
2074 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8145 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2934 Points ∼36% -64%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼97% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8154 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8105 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8204, n=10)
8086 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=499)
1926 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3956 Points ∼69%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1790 Points ∼31% -55%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼95% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼69% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼96% +40%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5765 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=9)
5009 Points ∼87% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=528)
2085 Points ∼36% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12547 Points ∼97%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5437 Points ∼42% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼98% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12750 Points ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12843 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12547 - 12895, n=9)
12716 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=528)
2763 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8652 Points ∼86%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3678 Points ∼36% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼98% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼84% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9877 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10090 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=9)
9458 Points ∼94% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=528)
2322 Points ∼23% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4958 Points ∼95%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3312 Points ∼64% -33%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼92% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5209 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=9)
4956 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=578)
2062 Points ∼40% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8365 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3289 Points ∼39% -61%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼99% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8432 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8284 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8045 - 8432, n=9)
8282 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=578)
1734 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7265 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3278 Points ∼45% -55%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7305 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7323 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7012 - 7323, n=10)
7198 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=579)
1658 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3965 Points ∼75%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1689 Points ∼32% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼95% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼80% +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5049 Points ∼96% +27%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5274 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=9)
4783 Points ∼91% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=620)
1925 Points ∼36% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11569 Points ∼93%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5005 Points ∼40% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼92% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼98% +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12494 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11557 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11371 - 12494, n=9)
11794 Points ∼94% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=619)
2278 Points ∼18% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8215 Points ∼87%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3576 Points ∼38% -56%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼94% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼90% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9492 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9138 Points ∼96% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9492, n=9)
8887 Points ∼94% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=622)
1963 Points ∼21% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
28985 Points ∼50%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18769 Points ∼32% -35%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼58% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points ∼45% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
58293 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26182 - 58293, n=9)
36070 Points ∼62% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=768)
15261 Points ∼26% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
146854 Points ∼95%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68764 Points ∼45% -53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼94% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points ∼98% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
154375 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (144611 - 154375, n=9)
148492 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=766)
25927 Points ∼17% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
76099 Points ∼67%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43325 Points ∼38% -43%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼74% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points ∼65% -4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
112989 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (72524 - 112989, n=9)
85586 Points ∼76% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=766)
20383 Points ∼18% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
205 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
96 fps ∼47% -53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
206 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (202 - 207, n=10)
204 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼67%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼67% 0%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 90, n=10)
72 fps ∼80% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼34% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
125 fps ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼44% -56%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
120 fps ∼95% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (120 - 126, n=10)
124 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼21% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼68%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
47 fps ∼53% -22%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 88, n=10)
69 fps ∼78% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼25% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
88 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
37 fps ∼42% -58%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (74 - 88, n=11)
85.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼79%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼43% -46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +27%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼68% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼80% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=11)
58.1 fps ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
29 fps ∼97%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼40% -59%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼97% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼93% -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 31, n=11)
27.5 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼37% -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼43% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=11)
20 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼40% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps ∼43% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=11)
43.6 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼36% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
54 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
23 fps ∼43% -57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 54, n=11)
51 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼36% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼41% -59%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (49 - 52, n=11)
50.6 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼27% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼41% -59%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼95% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
41 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=11)
38.9 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼28% -72%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
569967 Points ∼94%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
308878 Points ∼51% -46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼98% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼93% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
574589 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (557310 - 607937, n=11)
580619 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼52% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1456 Points ∼92%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1226 Points ∼78% -16%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼81% -12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points ∼95% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1395 Points ∼89% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1576, n=10)
1450 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼51% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11736 Points ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5153 Points ∼44% -56%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11747 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11445 - 11842, n=10)
11655 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼21% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8874 Points ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼51% -49%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼84% -16%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5564 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=10)
7263 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼20% -80%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10075 Points ∼99%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6430 Points ∼63% -36%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼97% -3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points ∼96% -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8421 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=10)
9643 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼33% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6273 Points ∼100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3674 Points ∼59% -41%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼92% -8%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5264 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=10)
5845 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼27% -73%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
67.698 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
66.292 Points ∼95% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.492 Points ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 69.5, n=10)
61.3 Points ∼88% -9%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
50.998 Points ∼73% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼73% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼58% -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
119.9 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
117.37 Points ∼98% -2%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.67 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (79.1 - 120, n=9)
110 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points ∼91% -9%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
103.45 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=601)
46.4 Points ∼39% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
74.5 runs/min ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83)
70.9 runs/min ∼95% -5%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.8 - 74.5, n=10)
65.4 runs/min ∼88% -12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
59.6 runs/min ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min ∼75% -25%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
49.8 runs/min ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=156)
43.1 runs/min ∼58% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
104 Points ∼88% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
103 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (99 - 118, n=10)
103 Points ∼87% 0%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼86% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% -4%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
76 Points ∼64% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼59% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
24369 Points ∼100%
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24369, n=10)
21331 Points ∼88% -12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points ∼86% -14%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
18546 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
15901 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼32% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -396%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
2665.8 ms * ∼27% -34%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
2410.7 ms * ∼24% -21%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401.34 ms * ∼24% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼21% -6%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼20% -0%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
1993.1 ms * ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2000 - 2538, n=11)
1956 ms * ∼20% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco F2 ProLG Velvetrealme X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10Nubia RedMagic 5GXiaomi Black Shark 3Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-40%
6%
-7%
-18%
1%
0%
-81%
Random Write 4KB
226.45
135.87
-40%
251.98
11%
215.95
-5%
193.57
-15%
227.8
1%
226
0%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
229.74
154.28
-33%
229.38
0%
207.04
-10%
201.64
-12%
238.3
4%
230
0%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
721.95
409.21
-43%
756.21
5%
679.51
-6%
388.38
-46%
679.6
-6%
722
0%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1634.45
924.54
-43%
1756.1
7%
1498.15
-8%
1654.41
1%
1692.2
4%
1634
0%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-80%
Carga Máxima
 42.3 °C41.6 °C38.5 °C 
 41.6 °C41.3 °C38.5 °C 
 41.8 °C41.1 °C38.7 °C 
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
36 °C39.4 °C40.1 °C
36.2 °C39.5 °C38.8 °C
36 °C39.2 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.8422539.942.53131.933.94038.943.45043.742.36329.8398025.930.710026.326.512524.929.816021.639.42001945.425018.948.331518.15440016.658.350016.262.763014.967.88001565100015.671.4125014.973.3160014.971.5200015.676.8250014.673.1315014.272.5400014.170500014.466.4630014.668.3800014.969.61000015.274.41250015.467.91600015.755.2SPL70.627.583.7N25.3156.1median 15.4median 67.8Delta2.110.432.539.229.426.922.826.225.325.830.236.423.324.421.924.5192219.632.41946.116.146.818.954.616.659.514.361.5156515.269.414.371.214.372.114.273.114.874.914.875.114.475.614.377.814.680.714.779.414.97414.970.514.668.314.855.615.448.326.887.70.969.3median 14.8median 69.41.411hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F2 Prorealme X50 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

realme X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2 / 3.1 / 4 Watt
Carga midlight 6.4 / 11.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
4700 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
55%
40%
50%
38%
24%
26%
46%
Idle Minimum *
2
0.66
67%
1
50%
0.53
73%
1.1
45%
1.2
40%
1.251 (0.53 - 2.2, n=10)
37%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
56%
Idle Average *
3.1
1.58
49%
1.77
43%
1.46
53%
1.5
52%
2.1
32%
2.25 (1.19 - 3.43, n=10)
27%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
43%
Idle Maximum *
4
1.6
60%
1.86
53%
1.52
62%
1.71
57%
2.5
37%
2.55 (1.23 - 4, n=10)
36%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
49%
Load Average *
6.4
3.3
48%
4.23
34%
3.83
40%
4.84
24%
6.3
2%
5.28 (3.5 - 7.4, n=10)
17%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
36%
Load Maximum *
11.6
5.46
53%
9.13
21%
8.89
23%
10.42
10%
10.7
8%
9.82 (7.68 - 12.3, n=10)
15%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 46min
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
4700 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
-25%
-20%
-41%
-29%
Reader / Idle
1954
1507
-23%
1789
-8%
1487
-24%
H.264
1466
1029
-30%
1126
-23%
899
-39%
WiFi v1.3
923
741
-20%
775
-16%
662
-28%
614
-33%
703
-24%
Load
286
194
-32%
226
-21%
149
-48%
206
-28%

Pro

+ Design e qualidade de construção
+ Desempenho
+ Boas durações
+ Painel OLED muito brilhante
+ Bom alto falante...

Contra

- ...que suporta apenas saída mono
- O painel se limita a 60 Hz
- Temperaturas relativamente altas
- Sem lente teleobjetiva
- Lente grande angular fraca

Veredicto do Poco F2 Pro - Excelente Smartphone de 60-Hz

In review: Poco F2 Pro. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Poco F2 Pro. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Poco F2 Pro, a Xiaomi conseguiu mais uma vez lançar um smartphone de gama média bem completo. Embora o modelo deste ano não seja tão barato quanto o Pocophone F1, o preço demandado de cerca de 430 Euros (~US$ 505) para o modelo de 128 GB ainda o torna uma oferta interessante - isso é ainda mais reforçado pelo fato de a versão de 256 GB estar frequentemente à venda por 450 Euros (~US$ 530) durante nossa análise.

O Poco F2 Pro oferece um painel OLED muito brilhante e bem calibrado, bateria de longa duração e um design moderno sem um entalhe ou um furo para interromper a tela. Além disso, a qualidade da construção é alta e o desempenho atinge quase, mas não exatamente, níveis de carros-chefes graças ao Snapdragon 865 e armazenamento UFS 3.1.     

Quem não precisar de 90 Hz e uma boa configuração da câmera descobrirá que o Poco F2 Pro tem muito a oferecer por um preço relativamente barato.

Infelizmente, a Xiaomi equipou o seu mais recente modelo de telefone Poco com um painel de apenas 60 Hz que exibe animações e rolagem menos fluida do que seus concorrentes internos Black Shark 3 ou Xiaomi Mi 10. Da mesma forma, o F2 Poco vem apenas com um único alto-falante integrado que produz uma experiência de áudio muito convincente. Comparado aos concorrentes de gama alta, também serão necessários compromissos no que diz respeito à qualidade da câmera. Devido à falta de uma lente telefoto e à qualidade bastante ruim da lente ultra grande angular, o telefone Poco parece muito menos flexível do que os telefones Android carros-chefes com câmera.

Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - 07/27/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
49 / 70 → 71%
Peso
88%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 64 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
82 / 86 → 96%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
70%
Médio
80%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro - Telefone de gama média com uma tela HDR AMOLED e >1000 nits
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 2)