Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Smartphone de Gama Alta com um Cheiro de Imperfeição

Name: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Brand: Samsung

Monstro dos smartphones. O Galaxy S20 Ultra da Samsung é como o modelo Plus, mas com esteroides. Além de oferecer uma tela ainda maior, ele também vem com uma configuração de câmera maciçamente atualizada, além de uma bateria maior. Descubra em nossa análise se o SoC Exynos é realmente muito mais lento e se o preço premium realmente vale a pena.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/02/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G ARM Galaxy S Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Galaxy S20 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

Memória

12 GB

, LPDDR5

Pantalha

6.90 polegadas 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 509 PPI, capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos, Infinity-O Display, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, HDR10+, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 104.3 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (até 1 TB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de orientação, sensor de proximidade, sensor hall, giroscópio, leitor ultrasônico de digitais, sensor geomagnético, barômetro, MST, Ant+

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800, e 1.900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (Banda 1, 2, 4, 5, e 8); LTE Cat. 20 (Banda 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, e 66), 5G (Band NR1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 77, e 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 166.9 x 76

Bateria

19.3 Wh, 5000 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3,86 V

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/1.33", 0.8 µm) + 48MP (para zoom ótico 4x, OIS, f/3.5, 103 mm, 1/2.0", 0.8 µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1.4 µm, Super Steady Video) + 0.3 MP (3D, f/1.0); 8k-Video; Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 0.7 µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: on-screen, Carregador, cabo USB, AKG headset, adaptador OTG, documentação, One UI 2.1, Facebook apps, Microsoft apps, Galaxy Store, 24 Meses Garantia, Body SAR: 1.557 W/kg, head SAR: 0.660 W/kg, IP68, fanless, waterproof

peso

219 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g

Preço

1349 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.9 %	04/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	219 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.90"	3200x1440
87.1 %	09/2019	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.50"	2688x1242
86.1 %	03/2020	Oppo Find X2 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	202 g	512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	3168x1440
89 %	12/2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176
86.9 %	11/2019	OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640	206 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	3120x1440
84.6 %	10/2019	LG G8X ThinQ SD 855, Adreno 640	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
87.4 %	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	198 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	3040x1440

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Oppo Find X2 Pro OnePlus 7T Pro LG G8X ThinQ Huawei Mate 30 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	818 (425^min - 890^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (461^min - 625^max) MBit/s -28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	509 (264^min - 571^max) MBit/s -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	352 (311^min - 375^max) MBit/s -57%
LG G8X ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (290^min - 411^max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	825 (763^min - 855^max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	754 (346^min - 881^max) MBit/s -9%
LG G8X ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 (539^min - 678^max) MBit/s -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (550^min - 597^max) MBit/s -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (347^min - 505^max) MBit/s -43%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -54%

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (763-855)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (425-890)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Huawei Mate 30 Pro

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 8.14 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 16.9 ∆E


737 cd/m²	733 cd/m²	762 cd/m²
738 cd/m²	734 cd/m²	769 cd/m²
749 cd/m²	740 cd/m²	768 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Infinity-O Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 769 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 747.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 734 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11

	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.90	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50	Oppo Find X2 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.70	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53	OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67	LG G8X ThinQ OLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Screen		25%	-27%	1%	0%	-50%
Brightness middle	734	790 8%	778 6%	592 -19%	606 -17%	570 -22%
Brightness	748	790 6%	775 4%	605 -19%	611 -18%	581 -22%
Brightness Distribution	95	97 2%	99 4%	96 1%	95 0%	90 -5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	1.4 56%	4.4 -38%	2.5 22%	3.46 -8%	6.27 -96%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.8	3.4 50%	8.7 -28%	5.5 19%	5.64 17%	9.75 -43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	1.9 30%	5.6 -107%	2.6 4%	2 26%	5.7 -111%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.16 ^102%	2.258 ^97%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6299 ^103%	6466 ^101%	7250 ^90%	6173 ^105%	6779 ^96%	7309 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	940 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1326 Points +41%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	911 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	781 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (903 - 944, n=5)	929 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points -2%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	2815 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3476 Points +23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3360 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3062 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2731 - 2899, n=5)	2800 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +7%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2960 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4491 Points
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=45, last 2 years)	7246 Points
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3804 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2641 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4043 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3670 - 3804, n=2)	3737 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=51, last 2 years)	7795 Points +105%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4791 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4278 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3898 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4791 - 4965, n=2)	4878 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	12557 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13279 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12280 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (12557 - 12561, n=2)	12559 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +12%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8648 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9491 Points +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	12228 Points +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 ()	8648 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +26%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	14307 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13360 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12645 Points -12%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11795 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (13627 - 14760, n=5)	14391 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	10255 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11387 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10442 Points +2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9259 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10008 - 11784, n=5)	10612 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	66452 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points +46%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	75632 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	64626 Points -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	72173 Points +9%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	68517 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (41415 - 68943, n=4)	61100 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	79572 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points +159%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	145567 Points +83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75073 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	118129 Points +48%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	103509 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (48476 - 87223, n=4)	74951 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	42135 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28147 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43459 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	30561 Points -27%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	31384 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (27431 - 42135, n=4)	37265 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8010 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8866 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8165 Points +2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6780 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5646 - 8097, n=5)	6920 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	11488 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points -2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11458 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10637 Points -7%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9806 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6388 - 11488, n=5)	9004 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3889 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5054 Points +30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4503 Points +16%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3260 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3846 - 4124, n=5)	3990 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7563 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9616 Points +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8605 Points +14%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6795 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (7385 - 8485, n=5)	7798 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9470 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12573 Points +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11448 Points +21%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9724 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (9470 - 11868, n=5)	10329 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4436 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5209 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points +16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4604 Points +4%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3308 Points -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3935 - 4455, n=5)	4240 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6836 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7012 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6266 Points -8%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5743 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6544 - 6896, n=5)	6733 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)	2770 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8257 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points -26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8045 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7044 Points -15%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6275 Points -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8005 - 8469, n=5)	8260 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)	2769 Points -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4267 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points -5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4582 Points +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4519 Points +6%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4429 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3963 - 4267, n=5)	4091 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)	3166 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	7412 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7982 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6916 Points -7%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5851 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6638 - 7459, n=5)	7083 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)	6789 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9157 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9345 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8006 Points -13%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6857 Points -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (870 - 9190, n=5)	7112 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)	9811 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4447 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5187 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points +25%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4683 Points +5%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3866 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4063 - 4495, n=5)	4284 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)	4236 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	6280 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6444 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5509 Points -12%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4838 Points -23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5042 - 6355, n=5)	5599 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)	2687 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	8659 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8076 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6527 Points -25%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5733 Points -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6136 - 8783, n=5)	7254 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)	2871 Points -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	3201 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3843 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points +21%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3564 Points +11%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3128 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3104 - 3230, n=5)	3154 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)	2676 Points -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	119 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps -50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps -50%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (60 - 119, n=5)	81.8 fps -31%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps -29%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	200 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps +44%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	202 fps +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps -7%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	151 fps -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (145 - 200, n=5)	186.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +24%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	59 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	58 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps -3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (59 - 90, n=5)	65.8 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +22%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	100 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps +57%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	123 fps +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	111 fps +11%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (96 - 126, n=5)	108.8 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +41%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	58 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +3%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	40 fps -31%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (58 - 61, n=5)	59 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +5%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	72 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +10%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (65 - 85, n=5)	77.4 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +38%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	44 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	26 fps -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps -45%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33 fps -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (34 - 45, n=5)	42 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	50 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps +26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps -18%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	48 fps -4%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (38 - 51, n=5)	47.6 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +20%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	51 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28 fps -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps -49%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (49 - 52, n=5)	50.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)	44.2 fps -13%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	56 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps +34%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -16%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (43 - 58, n=5)	53.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +15%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	33 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	18 fps -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -48%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25 fps -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (22 - 34, n=5)	29.8 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)	32.9 fps 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	22 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps +32%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	19 fps -14%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (20 - 23, n=5)	21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +17%

Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	71.6 (21.96^min - 153.62^max) fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72.6 (32.87^min - 131.8^max) fps +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	52.6 (9.22^min - 88.62^max) fps -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 ()	71.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.51 - 15712, n=55, last 2 years)	406 fps +467%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	85.4 (20.45^min - 139.09^max) fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	75.9 (34.23^min - 132.54^max) fps -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	63.1 (18.68^min - 143.33^max) fps -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 ()	85.4 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.65 - 13860, n=54, last 2 years)	329 fps +285%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	49.21 (16.35^min - 130.08^max) fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	43.11 (22.09^min - 84.76^max) fps -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	53.9 (18.27^min - 79.77^max) fps +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 ()	49.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.3 - 9309, n=53, last 2 years)	239 fps +386%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	42.64 (18.1^min - 74.99^max) fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	41.67 (24.54^min - 66.22^max) fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	45.92 (7.8^min - 77.95^max) fps +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 ()	42.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 14706, n=54, last 2 years)	339 fps +695%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	498708 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	510245 Points +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	599843 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	483224 Points -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	486654 Points -2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	418779 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (296746 - 527820, n=5)	469996 Points -6%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4957 Score
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4988 Score +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4997 Score +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4986 Score +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4607 - 4957, n=3)	4783 Score -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +21%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4915 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5540 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4992 Points +2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4841 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4764 - 4915, n=5)	4815 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +17%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	9478 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points +50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9555 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9294 Points -2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9113 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8843 - 9478, n=5)	9209 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +2%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	4497 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points -48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6350 Points +41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points +36%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5091 Points +13%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5140 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3775 - 4497, n=5)	4037 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	10781 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points +58%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11496 Points +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10618 Points -2%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9339 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10646 - 10803, n=5)	10744 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +31%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288	1270 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points +37%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1351 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1236 Points -3%
LG G8X ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1256 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (1270 - 1439, n=5)	1351 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +18%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.1 Points +149%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +105%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points +27%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	64.6 Points +25%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	63.1 Points +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	62.4 Points +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)	53.8 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	51.8 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.9 Points +237%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	115.4 Points +29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	114.7 Points +28%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	106.7 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)	92.8 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	89.6 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min +140%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min +16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	71 runs/min +11%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)	66.8 runs/min +5%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)	66.4 runs/min +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	63.7 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)	60.4 runs/min -5%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points +110%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +55%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points +38%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	100 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)	94.4 Points +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	93 Points +8%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	90 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	86 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points +158%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points +76%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	23999 Points +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points +23%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	23506 Points +23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	22976 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	19122 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)	19019 Points -1%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)	2387 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)	2345 ms *
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)	2201 ms * +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	2134 ms * +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	2044 ms * +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms * +16%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	571 ms * +76%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra	Oppo Find X2 Pro	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	OnePlus 7T Pro	LG G8X ThinQ	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-1%	6%	-39%	-35%	-7%	24%
Sequential Read 256KB	1632	1606 -2%	1781 9%	1489 -9%	705 -57%	1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13) -7%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) -8%
Sequential Write 256KB	697	729 5%	401.8 -42%	405 -42%	497.1 -29%	546 ?(213 - 740, n=13) -22%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 60%
Random Read 4KB	202.4	202.6 0%	226.4 12%	169 -17%	160.5 -21%	206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13) 2%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 22%
Random Write 4KB	221.4	205 -7%	259.2 17%	26 -88%	30.2 -86%	193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13) -12%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	67.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card) 22%		68.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	67.3 ?(34.6 - 81.6, n=8) 0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card) 19%		47.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -18%	55.7 ?(30.7 - 66.4, n=8) -4%

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.8 (34-42)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra; Real Racing 3; 8.2.1: Ø59.6 (49-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra; World of Tanks Blitz; 6.9.0.501: Ø59.9 (56-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.8 °C	33.5 °C	32.5 °C
34.8 °C	34.3 °C	32.3 °C
35 °C	35 °C	32.3 °C

Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 33.7 °C


30.7 °C	31.8 °C	31.9 °C
29.7 °C	31.7 °C	32 °C
29.9 °C	32.2 °C	34.1 °C

Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ocioso	0.76 / 1.91 / 1.96 Watt
Carga	4.72 / 10.15 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 990	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-12%	-58%	11%	-61%	1%	0%	5%
Idle Minimum *	0.76	0.92 -21%	1.47 -93%	0.87 -14%	2.1 -176%	1.1 -45%	0.846 ?(0.65 - 1, n=5) -11%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -18%
Idle Average *	1.91	2.9 -52%	3.43 -80%	1.75 8%	3 -57%	1.49 22%	1.534 ?(1.06 - 1.91, n=5) 20%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	1.96	2.94 -50%	3.52 -80%	1.83 7%	3.5 -79%	1.76 10%	1.858 ?(1.49 - 2.3, n=5) 5%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 17%
Load Average *	4.72	3.65 23%	6.2 -31%	3.85 18%	5.3 -12%	4.2 11%	5.14 ?(4.72 - 5.8, n=5) -9%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -18%
Load Maximum *	10.15	6.18 39%	10.63 -5%	6.64 35%	8.3 18%	9.2 9%	10.7 ?(9.99 - 11.8, n=5) -5%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		30h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 80)		12h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 41min

	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	LG G8X ThinQ 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		43%	-9%	7%	12%	29%
Reader / Idle	1858	2618 41%		2174 17%	2015 8%
H.264	1131	1346 19%		1098 -3%	957 -15%
WiFi v1.3	720	909 26%	654 -9%	823 14%	912 27%	930 29%
Load	221	408 85%		219 -1%	283 28%

Pro

+ Tela OLED brilhante e com cores precisas

+ Armazenamento rápido

+ Suporte para MicroSD

+ Dual-SIM (incluindo eSIM)

+ Ampla gama de frequências LTE

+ 5G

+ Boa qualidade de voz

Contra

- 5G sem mmWave

- O foco automático não funciona corretamente em condições de pouca iluminação

- 120 Hz apenas em FHD+

- Sem jogos em 120 Hz

- Slot microSD lento

- Sem aptX HD

Veredicto – Caro e inacabado

In review: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. Review unit provided by Samsung Germany.

Em teoria e de acordo com as especificações em papel, o Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra deve oferecer quase tudo o que você poderia desejar. Infelizmente, ele não atendeu às nossas expectativas de smartphones de gama alta em alguns aspectos.

Primeiro de tudo, vamos falar sobre o SoC. A Europa continua sendo a única região em todo o mundo onde a Samsung continua a vender os principais smartphones Galaxy equipados com o seu próprio SoC Exynos interno. Embora tenha apresentado desempenho mais lento em alguns benchmarks, essa não foi a nossa maior decepção. Em vez disso, o dano colateral é muito maior, como, por exemplo, a falta de suporte ao mmWave no modem 5G, embora, em teoria, deva suportar essa tecnologia. Além disso, o Exynos 990 teve um desempenho muito ruim sob uso intenso contínuo. Ainda não se sabe se isso foi causado por um sistema de resfriamento mal projetado ou um design medíocre de chip. A única maneira de saber seria uma comparação direta entre os dois SKUs, que ainda não conseguimos realizar.

O Galaxy S20 Ultra tem potencial para se tornar um smartphone de gama alta com seu próprio conjunto de experiências frustrantes para usuários com muita paciência.

Outra problema em potencial é a exibição. Embora ofereça cores brilhantes e possa ser extremamente brilhante, seu modo de 120 Hz é mais do que frustrante. Essa alta taxa de atualização não é apenas suportada em uma resolução reduzida FHD+, que é simplesmente muito baixa para uma tela desse tamanho, mas os jogos são completamente alheios às suas capacidades. Em nossos testes, não conseguimos obter taxas de quadros superiores a 60 FPS em nenhum jogo.

Sem dúvida, o destaque do S20 Ultra é sua câmera. Um grande sensor de 108 MP, zoom 100x, lente grande angular e muito mais do que você possa imaginar. E então, ao tirar fotos, você percebe repentinamente que a Samsung não conseguiu implementar um foco automático confiável. Uma bateria de 5.000 mAh deve prolongar a duração da bateria. Ou você poderia pensar, porque nossos testes revelaram muito espaço para melhorias.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

94%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

98%

Conectividade

69 / 70 → 98%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

59 / 64 → 93%

Desempenho da aplicação

79 / 86 → 91%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

75%

Médio

83%

89%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Smartphone de Gama Alta com um Cheiro de Imperfeição

Daniel Schmidt, 2020-04- 2 (Update: 2020-04- 3)

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Smartphone de Gama Alta com um Cheiro de Imperfeição

Vergleichsgeräte

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Caro e inacabado

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare