Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Smartphone de Gama Alta com um Cheiro de Imperfeição

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/02/2020

Monstro dos smartphones. O Galaxy S20 Ultra da Samsung é como o modelo Plus, mas com esteroides. Além de oferecer uma tela ainda maior, ele também vem com uma configuração de câmera maciçamente atualizada, além de uma bateria maior. Descubra em nossa análise se o SoC Exynos é realmente muito mais lento e se o preço premium realmente vale a pena.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Galaxy S20 Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memória
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Pantalha
6.9 polegadas 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 509 PPI, capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos, Infinity-O Display, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, HDR10+, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (até 1 TB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de orientação, sensor de proximidade, sensor hall, giroscópio, leitor ultrasônico de digitais, sensor geomagnético, barômetro, MST, Ant+
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800, e 1.900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (Banda 1, 2, 4, 5, e 8); LTE Cat. 20 (Banda 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, e 66), 5G (Band NR1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 77, e 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 166.9 x 76
Bateria
19.3 Wh, 5000 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3,86 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/1.33", 0.8 µm) + 48MP (para zoom ótico 4x, OIS, f/3.5, 103 mm, 1/2.0", 0.8 µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1.4 µm, Super Steady Video) + 0.3 MP (3D, f/1.0); 8k-Video; Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 0.7 µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: on-screen, Carregador, cabo USB, AKG headset, adaptador OTG, documentação, One UI 2.1, Facebook apps, Microsoft apps, Galaxy Store, 24 Meses Garantia, Body SAR: 1.557 W/kg, head SAR: 0.660 W/kg, IP68, fanless, waterproof
peso
219 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g
Preço
1349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.9"3200x1440
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
86 %
03/2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3168x1440
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
11/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
84 %
10/2019
LG G8X ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
87 %
04/2019
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"3040x1440

Size Comparison

166.9 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 219 g165.2 mm 74.4 mm 9.5 mm 202 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g159.3 mm 75.8 mm 8.4 mm 192 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (min: 763, max: 855) MBit/s ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (min: 346, max: 881) MBit/s ∼75% -9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (min: 539, max: 678) MBit/s ∼64% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼57% -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (min: 425, max: 890) MBit/s ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼61% -28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (min: 264, max: 571) MBit/s ∼53% -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -57%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 290, max: 411) MBit/s ∼36% -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -70%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (763-855)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (425-890)
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - lake
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - overview
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - overview
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - lake
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - lake
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - turning point
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
58.6 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
45 ∆E
33 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
42 ∆E
68.9 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 42.54 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 68.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 8.14 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 16.9 ∆E
737
cd/m²
733
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
768
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Infinity-O Display
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 769 cd/m² Médio: 747.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 734 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
LG G8X ThinQ
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Screen
25%
-27%
1%
0%
-50%
Brightness middle
734
790
8%
778
6%
592
-19%
606
-17%
570
-22%
Brightness
748
790
6%
775
4%
605
-19%
611
-18%
581
-22%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
99
4%
96
1%
95
0%
90
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
1.4
56%
4.4
-38%
2.5
22%
3.46
-8%
6.27
-96%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
3.4
50%
8.7
-28%
5.5
19%
5.64
17%
9.75
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.9
30%
5.6
-107%
2.6
4%
2
26%
5.7
-111%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
2.37 93%
CCT
6299 103%
6466 101%
7250 90%
6173 105%
6779 96%
7309 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3804 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2641 Points ∼65% -31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3670 - 3804, n=2)
3737 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=50)
1696 Points ∼42% -55%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
Points ∼0%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2960 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=48)
1758 Points ∼39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼84%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=3)
2815 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼60% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=3)
929 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼61% -39%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8648 Points ∼71%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
8648 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=346)
4786 Points ∼39% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
12557 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=408)
4874 Points ∼37% -61%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
4791 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=408)
1483 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼90%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼92% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9259 Points ∼81% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10255 - 10583, n=3)
10423 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼50% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼98%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼96% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼87% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11795 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (14307 - 14760, n=3)
14592 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼42% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼83%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3128 Points ∼81% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3112 - 3230, n=3)
3181 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼67% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼75% -25%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5733 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6315 - 8783, n=3)
7919 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼32% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼97%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼86% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼85% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4838 Points ∼75% -23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5139 - 6355, n=3)
5925 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼39% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% +5%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3866 Points ∼69% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=3)
4335 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼38% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼86% -13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6857 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8106 - 9190, n=3)
8818 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼87% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5851 Points ∼73% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=3)
7170 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4436 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼99% +16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼88% +4%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=3)
4275 Points ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9470 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼100% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼91% +21%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9724 Points ∼77% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11301, n=3)
10081 Points ∼80% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼21% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7563 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼74% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼89% +14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6795 Points ∼71% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7563 - 7981, n=3)
7707 Points ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼23% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼93% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% +6%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4429 Points ∼90% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=3)
4137 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼41% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼77% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼84% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6275 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8257 - 8469, n=3)
8379 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼78% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼86% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼89% -8%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5743 Points ∼82% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6732 - 6896, n=3)
6821 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3889 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼76% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼89% +16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3260 Points ∼65% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3889 - 4124, n=3)
4009 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼37% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11488 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼93% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9806 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=3)
8089 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8010 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼89% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼92% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6780 Points ∼76% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8010, n=3)
6451 Points ∼73% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42135 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65% -33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% -27%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
31384 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=2)
34783 Points ∼80% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼34% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
79572 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +159%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼71% +83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +48%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
103509 Points ∼50% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 79572, n=2)
64024 Points ∼31% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼12% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
66452 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +46%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼78% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
68517 Points ∼71% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 66452, n=2)
53934 Points ∼56% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼20% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +44%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼70% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
151 fps ∼53% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (199 - 200, n=3)
199 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼15% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=3)
79.7 fps ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼78% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼54% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (100 - 126, n=3)
111 fps ∼71% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼16% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼35% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼86% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% +10%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼51% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (72 - 85, n=3)
80.7 fps ∼81% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼20% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼62% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -31%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼49% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼39% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -48%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps ∼64% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼23% -68%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼55% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼26% -65%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼48% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -49%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 52, n=3)
51 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼28% -69%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +34%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼71% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (54 - 58, n=3)
56 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼24% -68%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +26%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -18%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% -4%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼57% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 51, n=3)
50.3 fps ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼21% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼54% -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -45%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼25% -73%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42.64 (min: 18.1, max: 74.99) fps ∼93%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
41.67 (min: 24.54, max: 66.22) fps ∼91% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
45.92 (min: 7.8, max: 77.95) fps ∼100% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
42.6 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18.9 - 45.9, n=11)
30.9 fps ∼67% -28%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
71.55 (min: 21.96, max: 153.62) fps ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72.56 (min: 32.87, max: 131.8) fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52.62 (min: 9.22, max: 88.62) fps ∼73% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
71.6 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.71 - 72.6, n=13)
34.8 fps ∼48% -51%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49.21 (min: 16.35, max: 130.08) fps ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43.11 (min: 22.09, max: 84.76) fps ∼80% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
53.86 (min: 18.27, max: 79.77) fps ∼100% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
49.2 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17.9 - 53.9, n=11)
33.2 fps ∼62% -33%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
85.44 (min: 20.45, max: 139.09) fps ∼100%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75.88 (min: 34.23, max: 132.54) fps ∼89% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
63.13 (min: 18.68, max: 143.33) fps ∼74% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
85.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 85.4, n=14)
36.4 fps ∼43% -57%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼83%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼81% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
418779 Points ∼70% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 504192, n=3)
433215 Points ∼72% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼51% -39%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=79)
2537 Score ∼51% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +37%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼77% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1256 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1378, n=3)
1307 Points ∼75% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼45% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +58%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼68% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9339 Points ∼55% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10703 - 10803, n=3)
10762 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼14% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼37% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼100% +41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼97% +36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼80% +13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5140 Points ∼81% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=3)
4181 Points ∼66% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼27% -62%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼67%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +50%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼67% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9113 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=3)
9201 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼23% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼99% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96% +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% +2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4841 Points ∼86% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=3)
4819 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼29% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +149%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +27%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼50% +25%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
63.096 Points ∼49% +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 53.9, n=3)
52.1 Points ∼40% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼30% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +237%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% +29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼38% +28%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
106.73 Points ∼35% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 93.5, n=3)
90.8 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼15% -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +140%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼46% +11%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)
66.8 runs/min ∼44% +5%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 63.7, n=3)
59.1 runs/min ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼28% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +110%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +38%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼55% +16%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% +8%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
90 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 97, n=3)
89.7 Points ∼50% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼38% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +158%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +23%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
23506 Points ∼48% +23%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼47% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 19122, n=3)
18459 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼15% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -331%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2345 - 2511, n=3)
2448 ms * ∼24% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼23%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
2201.2 ms * ∼22% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼20% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +76%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20 UltraOppo Find X2 ProHuawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T ProLG G8X ThinQAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
6%
-39%
-35%
-7%
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
19%
47.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
2%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
22%
68.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
7%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
2%
Random Write 4KB
221.37
204.98
-7%
259.21
17%
26
-88%
30.2
-86%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-18%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
202.43
202.63
0%
226.38
12%
169
-17%
160.5
-21%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
-4%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
697.08
728.72
5%
401.79
-42%
405
-42%
497.1
-29%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
-24%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1632.02
1605.6
-2%
1780.5
9%
1489
-9%
704.8
-57%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-7%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-81%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.17.0: Ø39.8 (34-42)
; Real Racing 3; 8.2.1: Ø59.6 (49-61)
; World of Tanks Blitz; 6.9.0.501: Ø59.9 (56-61)
Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C33.5 °C32.5 °C 
 34.8 °C34.3 °C32.3 °C 
 35 °C35 °C32.3 °C 
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 33.7 °C
30.7 °C31.8 °C31.9 °C
29.7 °C31.7 °C32 °C
29.9 °C32.2 °C34.1 °C
Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.431.52529.629.33129.828.54025.526.15033.232.16326.824.98025.523.310023.724.312519.13316018.953.320017.250.925017.552.83151757.540015.159.7500156463014.764.380015.565.7100015.567.3125014.771.5160014.575.1200014.675.7250014.574.3315013.775.7400014.772.3500014.572.3630014.569.8800014.570.61000014.869.51250014.962.71600015.556SPL26.984.4N0.958.1median 14.9median 65.7Delta1.38.532.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.91 / 1.96 Watt
Carga midlight 4.72 / 10.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-58%
11%
-61%
1%
-6%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.92
-21%
1.47
-93%
0.87
-14%
2.1
-176%
1.1
-45%
0.887 (0.76 - 1, n=3)
-17%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-16%
Idle Average *
1.91
2.9
-52%
3.43
-80%
1.75
8%
3
-57%
1.49
22%
1.703 (1.5 - 1.91, n=3)
11%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
8%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
2.94
-50%
3.52
-80%
1.83
7%
3.5
-79%
1.76
10%
2.09 (1.96 - 2.3, n=3)
-7%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-4%
Load Average *
4.72
3.65
23%
6.2
-31%
3.85
18%
5.3
-12%
4.2
11%
5.11 (4.72 - 5.8, n=3)
-8%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
13%
Load Maximum *
10.15
6.18
39%
10.63
-5%
6.64
35%
8.3
18%
9.2
9%
11.2 (10.2 - 11.8, n=3)
-10%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
41%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 80)
12h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 41min
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
43%
-9%
7%
12%
29%
Reader / Idle
1858
2618
41%
2174
17%
2015
8%
H.264
1131
1346
19%
1098
-3%
957
-15%
WiFi v1.3
720
909
26%
654
-9%
823
14%
912
27%
930
29%
Load
221
408
85%
219
-1%
283
28%

Pro

+ Tela OLED brilhante e com cores precisas
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Suporte para MicroSD
+ Dual-SIM (incluindo eSIM)
+ Ampla gama de frequências LTE
+ 5G
+ Boa qualidade de voz

Contra

- 5G sem mmWave
- O foco automático não funciona corretamente em condições de pouca iluminação
- 120 Hz apenas em FHD+
- Sem jogos em 120 Hz
- Slot microSD lento
- Sem aptX HD

Veredicto – Caro e inacabado

In review: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. Review unit provided by Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. Review unit provided by Samsung Germany.

Em teoria e de acordo com as especificações em papel, o Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra deve oferecer quase tudo o que você poderia desejar. Infelizmente, ele não atendeu às nossas expectativas de smartphones de gama alta em alguns aspectos.

Primeiro de tudo, vamos falar sobre o SoC. A Europa continua sendo a única região em todo o mundo onde a Samsung continua a vender os principais smartphones Galaxy equipados com o seu próprio SoC Exynos interno. Embora tenha apresentado desempenho mais lento em alguns benchmarks, essa não foi a nossa maior decepção. Em vez disso, o dano colateral é muito maior, como, por exemplo, a falta de suporte ao mmWave no modem 5G, embora, em teoria, deva suportar essa tecnologia. Além disso, o Exynos 990 teve um desempenho muito ruim sob uso intenso contínuo. Ainda não se sabe se isso foi causado por um sistema de resfriamento mal projetado ou um design medíocre de chip. A única maneira de saber seria uma comparação direta entre os dois SKUs, que ainda não conseguimos realizar.

O Galaxy S20 Ultra tem potencial para se tornar um smartphone de gama alta com seu próprio conjunto de experiências frustrantes para usuários com muita paciência.

Outra problema em potencial é a exibição. Embora ofereça cores brilhantes e possa ser extremamente brilhante, seu modo de 120 Hz é mais do que frustrante. Essa alta taxa de atualização não é apenas suportada em uma resolução reduzida FHD+, que é simplesmente muito baixa para uma tela desse tamanho, mas os jogos são completamente alheios às suas capacidades. Em nossos testes, não conseguimos obter taxas de quadros superiores a 60 FPS em nenhum jogo.

Sem dúvida, o destaque do S20 Ultra é sua câmera. Um grande sensor de 108 MP, zoom 100x, lente grande angular e muito mais do que você possa imaginar. E então, ao tirar fotos, você percebe repentinamente que a Samsung não conseguiu implementar um foco automático confiável. Uma bateria de 5.000 mAh deve prolongar a duração da bateria. Ou você poderia pensar, porque nossos testes revelaram muito espaço para melhorias.

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - 03/30/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
94%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
98%
Conectividade
69 / 70 → 98%
Peso
88%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 93%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 86 → 91%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
75%
Médio
83%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra - Smartphone de Gama Alta com um Cheiro de Imperfeição
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-04- 2 (Update: 2020-04- 3)