Notebookcheck Logo

Análise do laptop Acer Predator Helios 18 2024: Novo hardware para o jogador de 18 polegadas

No trem Mini-LED. os notebooks de 18 polegadas estão, lenta mas seguramente, deixando de ser um produto de nicho. Além da MSI, Asus e Alienware, a Acer também oferece produtos adequados. Colocamos a versão mais recente do Predator Helios 18 à prova.
Acer Predator Helios 18

Em 2023, a Acer começou a vender laptops de 18 polegadas. Embora nosso primeiro dispositivo de teste foi equipado com um Core i9-13900HX e uma GeForce RTX 4080a configuração de teste do modelo sucessor conta com um Core i9-14900HX e um GeForce RTX 4090. Uma coisa que permaneceu a mesma é o poderoso painel Mini-LED do laptop que impressiona quase inteiramente sem compromisso (mais sobre isso em breve). A Acer instalou 2x 16 GB de RAM DDR5-5600 e dois NVMe-SSDs no formato RAID-0 (M.2 2280) com 1 TB de armazenamento cada. No momento do teste, o laptop ainda não estava disponível nos Estados Unidos, portanto, ainda não podemos dar nenhuma informação sobre seu preço de venda.

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Processador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1590 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.18, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Pantalha
18.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, WQXGA, Brilhante: não, HDR, 250 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, NVMe-SSDs, two M.2-slots (both in use)
Placa de Som
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Combined (Headset/Mic), Card Reader: microSD
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.5 x 405 x 312
Bateria
90 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP FHD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 330 W Power Supply, Key Caps, Predator Sense, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.278 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.226 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.1 %
03/2024
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.3 kg29.5 mm18.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
01/2024
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.6 kg32.1 mm18.00"3840x2400
88.3 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg30.8 mm18.00"2560x1600
88.3 %
10/2023
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
3.2 kg29.15 mm18.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
11/2023
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
3.9 kg26.7 mm18.00"1920x1200

Caso

No que diz respeito à caixa do dispositivo, a Acer manteve-se fiel ao seu antecessor - embora, ao olhar mais de perto, o senhor comece a notar algumas mudanças. O fabricante trocou o modelo do teclado e redesenhou a elegante faixa de luz na parte traseira. O laptop continua sendo de alta qualidade, pois a tampa e a parte superior da unidade básica são feitas de metal. Também não temos nada negativo a relatar sobre a construção do dispositivo. No entanto, a Acer poderia melhorar as dobradiças do laptop, pois elas podem ser um pouco instáveis às vezes. Embora a tampa possa ser mais estável e certas partes do teclado possam ser empurradas para dentro quando o senhor pressiona com força suficiente, ainda assim classificaríamos o gabinete como estável. Seu design não é monótono nem excessivamente divertido.

Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18

Com relação ao peso, o Predator Helios 18 está na média. Seus 3,3 kg são mais do que o Asus ROG Strix Scar 18, mas menos do que o MSI Titan 18 e o Alienware m18.

Comparação de tamanho

410.3 mm 319.9 mm 26.7 mm 3.9 kg404 mm 307.5 mm 32.1 mm 3.6 kg405 mm 312 mm 29.5 mm 3.3 kg405 mm 311.6 mm 29.15 mm 3.2 kg399 mm 294 mm 30.8 mm 3.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Conectividade

As opções de conectividade do dispositivo são modernas. Enquanto a parte traseira abriga uma saída HDMI 2.1 e duas portas Thunderbolt 4 (incluindo DisplayPort e Power Delivery), o lado direito apresenta duas portas USB 3.2 Gen-2 (Tipo A) e um slot para uma trava Kensington. Esse pacote é complementado por uma porta RJ45, uma porta USB 3.0 (Tipo A), um leitor de cartão microSD e um conector de áudio no lado esquerdo.

Esquerda: LAN RJ45, USB-A 3.0, leitor MicroSD, áudio
Esquerda: LAN RJ45, USB-A 3.0, leitor MicroSD, áudio
Direita: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, trava Kensington
Direita: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, trava Kensington
Parte traseira: Alimentação, HDMI 2.1, 2x Thunderbolt 4
Parte traseira: Alimentação, HDMI 2.1, 2x Thunderbolt 4

Leitor de cartão SD

O leitor de cartão instalado atinge velocidades medíocres. Somente o Alienware m18, que foi capaz de usar nossa placa de referência até certo ponto, nos impressionou nesse aspecto.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
177.5 MB/s +104%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.8 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
72 (60.61min - 73.13max) MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
230.5 MB/s +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +35%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
91.5 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.99 MB/s -4%

Comunicação

O novo Helios 18 tem um chip Wi-Fi 7 de última geração, que só podemos testar de forma limitada devido à falta de hardware adequado. Em nossos testes padrão, seu módulo Wi-Fi apresentou um desempenho sólido (envio) até um desempenho muito bom (recebimento).

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Qualcomm WCN685x
1460 (1310min - 1543max) MBit/s +76%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
  (831 - 1609, n=4)
1290 MBit/s +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s +53%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1011 (514min - 1160max) MBit/s +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
968 (656min - 1200max) MBit/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
942 (475min - 985max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
831 (611min - 909max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1681 (1662min - 1704max) MBit/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1589 (1385min - 1671max) MBit/s
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
  (1317 - 1644, n=4)
1539 MBit/s -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Qualcomm WCN685x
1461 (766min - 1548max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
1116 (932min - 1352max) MBit/s -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
872 (330min - 895max) MBit/s -45%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (611-909)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (514-1160)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø968 (656-1200)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø926 (475-985)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1460 (1310-1543)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1385-1671)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1116 (932-1352)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1662-1704)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (330-895)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (766-1548)

Webcam

Graças à sua resolução Full HD, a webcam instalada é um pouco mais nítida do que a maioria dos laptops, mas, como geralmente acontece, ainda há espaço para melhorias no que se refere à precisão das cores.

ColorChecker
8.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
12 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW: 7.7 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 15.26 ∆E

Acessórios

O Predator Helios 18 tem um recurso especial interessante: Sua caixa não só contém grades de ventilador substituíveis para a parte traseira do dispositivo, mas também recebe dois conjuntos de teclas WASD diferentes e algumas alavancas de teclas. Como esperado, a fonte de alimentação de 330 watts fornecida é bastante volumosa.

Manutenção

Suas opções de manutenção nos deixaram com sentimentos contraditórios. Leva um bom tempo para desparafusar os 14 parafusos Torx e abrir a placa inferior - além disso, a Acer pode até mesmo assustar muitos usuários com o uso de um selo de garantia (cobrindo um parafuso). Na parte interna, o senhor pelo menos tem acesso ao sistema de resfriamento, à bateria, ao módulo WLAN, à RAM e ao SSD. Entretanto, os dois últimos estão cobertos por películas e almofadas, o que não facilita a troca.

Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18
Acer Predator Helios 18

Garantia

O laptop é coberto por uma garantia de 24 meses.

Dispositivos de entrada

Teclado

Os gamers ficarão entusiasmados ao ver a ampla iluminação do laptop em particular (RGB de tecla única) que, a nosso ver, poderia ser um pouco mais uniforme. Para um teclado clássico com cúpula de borracha, ele é surpreendentemente bom para digitar - é apenas um pouco barulhento. Com exceção de alguns detalhes (teclado numérico modificado), seu layout é bom. Ao contrário de outros fabricantes, a Acer não fez muitas experiências e a maioria das funções é útil. O fabricante também merece elogios pelo tamanho generoso das teclas do laptop (por exemplo, suas teclas de seta bem dimensionadas).

Acer Predator Helios 18

Touchpad

O touchpad também é quase perfeito. Seu tamanho de 15 x 9 cm é generoso e permite movimentos longos sem a necessidade de levantar o dedo. Além disso, sua superfície lisa garante que seus dedos deslizem bem sobre o touchpad. Não notamos nada imperceptível no que diz respeito ao suporte a gestos e à precisão.

Tela

A versão 2024 herdou a tela Mini-LED de seu antecessor (WQXGA, 16:10, 250 Hz, HDR1000). Se desconsiderarmos a oscilação em todos os níveis de brilho (que, felizmente, só deve ser um problema para usuários sensíveis), essa tecnologia tem vantagens claras sobre um painel IPS padrão.

735
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
751
cd/m²
723
cd/m²
722
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
712
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 751 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 723.8 cd/m² Minimum: 45 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 722 cd/m²
Contraste: 18050:1 (Preto: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.383
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18.00
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18.00
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18.00
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
AUO45A8 (B180QAN01.2), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.00
Display
-3%
-1%
0%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.7
98.1
-2%
99.9
0%
99.8
0%
98.5
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.8
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
91.6
86.2
-6%
90
-2%
91.8
0%
88.7
-3%
Response Times
-140%
3%
-15%
55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 ?(4.9, 3.1)
8.6 ?(4.2, 4.4)
-8%
12 ?(8, 4)
-50%
7.6 ?(4.4, 3.2)
5%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
65%
Response Time Black / White *
17.6 ?(15.2, 2.4)
81.8 ?(76, 5.8)
-365%
10.7 ?(7.6, 3.1)
39%
17.8 ?(15.6, 2.2)
-1%
9.6 ?(4.9, 4.7)
45%
PWM Frequency
4832 ?(100)
2592 ?(100)
-46%
5733 ?(94)
19%
2509
-48%
Screen
-24%
17%
-82%
-54%
Brightness middle
722
467.5
-35%
937
30%
360
-50%
319.6
-56%
Brightness
724
459
-37%
934
29%
355
-51%
304
-58%
Brightness Distribution
93
90
-3%
89
-4%
92
-1%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.04
0.066
-65%
0.21
-425%
0.25
-525%
Contrast
18050
14197
-21%
1714
-91%
1278
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.4
3.77
-11%
1.52
55%
3.82
-12%
1.22
64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.32
6.12
-15%
2.82
47%
7.38
-39%
3.1
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.6
2.94
-84%
1.21
24%
2.24
-40%
0.47
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
3.2
16%
1.7
55%
5.06
-33%
0.8
79%
Gamma
2.383 92%
2.43 91%
2.042 108%
2.52 87%
2.23 99%
CCT
7051 92%
6478 100%
6578 99%
5657 115%
6471 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-56% / -46%
6% / 10%
-32% / -52%
0% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

A começar por seu brilho impressionante: Uma média de 724 cd/m² significa que o senhor pode usar o dispositivo mesmo em ambientes muito claros (ou seja, ao ar livre). Em combinação com seu valor de preto extremamente baixo de aproximadamente 0,04 cd/m², a tela oferece um excelente contraste de cerca de 18.000:1. Além disso, a ampla cobertura do espaço de cores - embora não consiga cobrir o AdobeRGB em sua totalidade, ela consegue cobrir 100% do sRGB e do DCI-P3, o que é impressionante.

CalMAN: escala de cinza
CalMAN: escala de cinza
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: saturação de cor
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)

Infelizmente, sua precisão de cores não é das melhores logo que sai da caixa, portanto, os usuários profissionais devem realizar uma calibração após a compra (nosso arquivo ICC está no link acima).

Acer Predator Helios 18 vs sRGB
Acer Predator Helios 18 vs sRGB
Acer Predator Helios 18 vs AdobeRGB
Acer Predator Helios 18 vs AdobeRGB
Acer Predator Helios 18 vs DCI-P3
Acer Predator Helios 18 vs DCI-P3

Seus tempos de resposta são de decentes a bons, mas não conseguem se equiparar aos dos painéis OLED que, além disso, oferecem contrastes e valores de preto ainda melhores. Por outro lado, eles também têm seus próprios pontos fracos (por exemplo, geralmente uma superfície reflexiva).

Iluminação de fundo
Iluminação de fundo
Subpixels
Subpixels
Ângulos de visão
Ângulos de visão

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.9 ms rise
↘ 3.1 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 4832 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 4832 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 4832 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % de brilho
100 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
80 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
60 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
40 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
20 % de brilho
0 % de brilho
0 % de brilho

Desempenho

Os componentes do Predator Helios 18 são modelos topo de linha quando se trata de laptops para jogos. 32 GB de RAM e 2 TB de armazenamento devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários nos próximos anos. O mesmo pode ser dito sobre a potência da CPU e da GPU, que ainda não atingiram seus limites devido à resolução moderada da tela do laptop de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWINFO
 

Condições de teste

No software pré-instalado do fabricante (Predator Sense), há vários modos de operação listados em Scenario, que têm grande influência no desempenho e nas emissões de ruído. Como o laptop de 18 polegadas é extremamente barulhento no modo turbo (>60 dB em jogos), todas as medições foram realizadas no modo de desempenho. Portanto, os valores determinados de velocidade e emissão só são comparáveis aos do seu antecessor até certo ponto.

Sentido do Predador
Sentido do Predador
Sentido do Predador
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Silencioso Balanceado Desempenho Turbo
Ruído 38 dB(A) 43 dB(A) 49 dB(A) 61 dB(A)
Desempenho 130 fps 160 fps 180 fps 200 fps

Processador

O Core i9-14900HX é um modelo topo de linha da série Raptor Lake da Intel e, embora tenha um alto consumo, oferece excelente desempenho. A Intel faz uso de 8 núcleos de desempenho com hyper threading e 16 núcleos de eficiência sem HT, resultando em 32 threads paralelos. No modo de desempenho, a CPU obteve resultados ligeiramente abaixo da média (-6% em comparação com a média anterior). Além disso, seu desempenho cai durante períodos mais longos de carga, como revelou nosso loop Cinebench (veja o gráfico). Esse não foi o caso de nenhum dos dispositivos da concorrência.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4064 (3787.52-4673.44)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4541 (4495.39-4584.53)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5466 (5377.07-5540.93)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
86.2 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
81.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
80.7 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.3 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34613 (33896.2min - 34613.2max) Points +32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32428 (29693.8min - 32428.3max) Points +24%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30631 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=23)
28969 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28516 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26171 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years)
19653 Points -25%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2177 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2176 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2043 - 2235, n=23)
2175 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2143 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2093 Points -4%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1948 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years)
1819 Points -16%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13308 Points +35%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
12103 Points +22%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11726 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=23)
11018 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10787 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
9881 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years)
7470 Points -24%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
833 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (779 - 859, n=23)
833 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
832 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
823 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
804 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
747 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years)
701 Points -16%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5541 (5377.07min - 5540.93max) Points +19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4782 (4700.35min - 4782.4max) Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4673 (3787.52min - 4673.44max) Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4585 (4495.39min - 4584.53max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=24)
4398 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4098 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years)
3111 Points -33%
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
309 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (287 - 320, n=24)
308 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
302 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
300 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
295 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years)
269 Points -14%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=230, last 2 years)
198.4 Seconds * -59%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=23)
118.9 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
118 Seconds * +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
106 Seconds * +15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104 Seconds * +17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
87 Seconds * +30%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
140493 MIPS +31%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121266 MIPS +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
119590 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
114546 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=23)
112774 MIPS +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106977 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years)
77566 MIPS -27%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7381 MIPS +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7172 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7508, n=23)
7105 MIPS +14%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6977 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6504 MIPS +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6206 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years)
6142 MIPS -1%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
18014 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17695 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=23)
17564 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17403 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16652 Points -4%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16316 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years)
14236 Points -18%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2999 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=23)
2995 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2965 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2892 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2876 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2843 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years)
2666 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20566 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20029 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19975 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19802 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=23)
19446 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19137 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=236, last 2 years)
13679 Points -32%
Single-Core
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2124 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2118 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=23)
2102 Points +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2098 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2054 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2009 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=236, last 2 years)
1814 Points -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
37.5 fps +27%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.9 fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30.7 fps +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=23)
29.6 fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29.2 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years)
21.3 fps -28%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.1 s *
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
49.5 s * +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=228, last 2 years)
49.1 s * +42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.2 s * +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=23)
44.6 s * +48%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
43.8 s * +49%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
41.8 s * +51%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years)
0.4679 sec * -11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4225 sec *
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.4145 sec * +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3997 sec * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3944 sec * +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3919 sec * +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23)
0.3818 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4673 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
269 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
312 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
93.2 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
58.4 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
55.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
43.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
60169 KRay/s +152%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
29351 KRay/s +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
27414 KRay/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25444 KRay/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=22)
25121 KRay/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
23862 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years)
18693 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
252486 Points +113%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148888 Points +26%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137015 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128826 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=22)
125646 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118469 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years)
93857 Points -21%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
10389 MB/s +79%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7229 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6889 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6204 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=22)
6189 MB/s +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
5804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years)
4348 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
200651 Points +44%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148773 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141681 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139146 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=22)
138500 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
135396 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years)
109886 Points -21%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
32988 Points +118%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18256 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16121 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
16046 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=22)
15333 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15099 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years)
12226 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
134044 Points +127%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72355 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
68687 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63748 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=22)
61661 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59005 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years)
48017 Points -19%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
237881 MB/s +112%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
149040 MB/s +33%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138830 MB/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=22)
138443 MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122250 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
112197 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years)
108279 MB/s -3%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
2409 MB/s +42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2149 MB/s +27%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1913 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=22)
1802 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1789 MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1696 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years)
1218 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
31796 KRay/s +153%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16104 KRay/s +28%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15014 KRay/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13608 KRay/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=22)
13530 KRay/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
12565 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years)
10121 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50394 MPixel/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49710 MPixel/s +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=22)
48315 MPixel/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
47343 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years)
36915 MPixel/s -22%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
34957 MPixel/s -26%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
33960 MPixel/s -28%

Desempenho do sistema

O desempenho do sistema também não foi suficiente para o primeiro lugar. Sua pontuação total no PCMark 10 é comparável à de seu antecessor. A RAM do dispositivo oferece níveis de desempenho típicos da RAM DDR5-5600.

PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
9852 Points +20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
8968 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
8801 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (8201 - 9234, n=8)
8668 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8549 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8230 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12334 Points +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
11628 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
11394 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10871 - 11628, n=8)
11190 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11032 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10982 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
11388 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9951 - 11759, n=8)
10707 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10528 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10488 Points +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
10225 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
9951 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
18475 Points +34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
16462 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
15421 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (13219 - 16462, n=8)
14791 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
14720 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
13779 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2208 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2194 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1877 - 2238, n=7)
2123 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1929 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1877 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2059 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2055 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1738 - 2113, n=7)
1980 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1793 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1738 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2478 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2411 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2195 - 2543, n=7)
2384 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2212 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2195 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1998 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1944 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1478 - 2327, n=7)
1863 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1594 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1478 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
387 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 339, n=7)
329 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
327 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
322 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
320 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years)
301 Points
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
304 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (287 - 309, n=5)
301 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
295 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
287 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years)
263 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years)
519 ms * -18%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
459 ms * -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
456 ms * -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
452 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
449 ms * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (430 - 467, n=8)
447 ms * -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
441 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8230 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83392 MB/s +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
78590 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78016 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=22)
77573 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years)
59613 MB/s -24%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
56992 MB/s -27%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
51423 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86788 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
86406 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85323 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 87507, n=22)
84273 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years)
63575 MB/s -25%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
61564 MB/s -28%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77534 MB/s +11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75736 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=22)
74508 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70089 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years)
61792 MB/s -12%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
61092 MB/s -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51387 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
105 ns * -27%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
91.3 ns * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=22)
84.1 ns * -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * -0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83 ns *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.8 ns * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Latência DPC

As latências do laptop podem ser consideravelmente mais baixas do que no antigo Helios 18, mas, de acordo com a ferramenta LatencyMon, elas ainda são muito altas para determinados campos de uso (edição de áudio e vídeo em tempo real).

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8290.5 μs * -145%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
3388 μs *
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2384.5 μs * +30%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1155.8 μs * +66%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1117.4 μs * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

Conforme mencionado em nossa introdução, a Acer combinou dois SSDs NVMe em uma matriz Raid 0. À primeira vista, isso oferece resultados de primeira classe quando se trata de suas taxas de leitura e gravação sequenciais. No entanto, o resfriamento do laptop parece não ser o ideal, pois notamos algumas flutuações ocasionais de desempenho após algum tempo durante nosso teste de loop.

2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 8578 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1955 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 671.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 493.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1725 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1218 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 8.926 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 10.12 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
77.7 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
73 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
68.5 pt
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
 
67.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.3 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
65.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
7045 (6975.86min - 7044.54max) MB/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
5424 (5395.57min - 5423.86max) MB/s -23%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (3087 - 7045, n=2)
5066 MB/s -28%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3975 (3933.84min - 3975.36max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3908 (3887.48min - 3908.2max) MB/s -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s -50%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3504 (3460.3min - 3503.92max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8992 (8801.75min - 8992.01max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (8109 - 8992, n=2)
8551 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
7291 (7191.64min - 7291.38max) MB/s -19%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
4889 (4680.84min - 4888.75max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
4335 (4306.29min - 4335.44max) MB/s -52%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4309 (4272.74min - 4308.62max) MB/s -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)
3829 MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
13588 (10727.3min - 13588.3max) MB/s +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11019 (9854.1min - 11018.8max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (7439 - 11019, n=2)
9229 MB/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7115 (6689.03min - 7114.56max) MB/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7084 (6413.06min - 7083.97max) MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6390 MB/s -42%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6329 (5886.29min - 6328.58max) MB/s -43%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11472 (11391min - 11471.6max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (11187 - 11472, n=2)
11330 MB/s -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
10571 (10519.3min - 10571.3max) MB/s -8%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5398 (5134.26min - 5397.97max) MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5255 (5183.65min - 5254.62max) MB/s -54%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5125 (5108.87min - 5125.2max) MB/s -55%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
81.6 (81.02min - 81.62max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
80.7 (80.11min - 80.66max) MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75.7 (74.61min - 75.65max) MB/s -7%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (68.8 - 81.6, n=2)
75.2 MB/s -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
69.6 (68.6min - 69.57max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s -17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
65.8 (65.71min - 65.83max) MB/s -19%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
273 (271.42min - 272.88max) MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
259 (250.68min - 258.82max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
230 (219.52min - 229.87max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -14%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
219 (216.03min - 218.97max) MB/s -15%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (178.4 - 259, n=2)
219 MB/s -15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
152.1 (149.74min - 152.09max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3829 (3376.24min - 3829.14max) MB/s +176%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3829 (3814.3min - 3829.16max) MB/s +176%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3732 (3273.44min - 3732.1max) MB/s +169%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)
2590 MB/s +87%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1623 (1464.8min - 1623.24max) MB/s +17%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (1385 - 1666, n=2)
1526 MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1385 (1275.7min - 1385.11max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3225 (3169.52min - 3224.75max) MB/s +142%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2900 MB/s +118%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2627 (2557.39min - 2627.4max) MB/s +98%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s +62%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (1330 - 1433, n=2)
1382 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1377 (1306.51min - 1377.05max) MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1330 (1184.45min - 1330.4max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
8367 Points +64%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8304 Points +63%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
8209 Points +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6843 Points +34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
5369 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
5102 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (4895 - 5102, n=2)
4999 Points -2%
Score Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3403 Points +66%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3329 Points +62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3272 Points +60%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2508 Points +22%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2194 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
2049 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (2002 - 2049, n=2)
2026 Points -1%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3490 Points +71%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3321 Points +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3120 Points +53%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3106 Points +52%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2092 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
2038 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (1903 - 2038, n=2)
1971 Points -3%
Seq Read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
9576.8 MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8496.25 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (8169 - 8496, n=2)
8333 MB/s -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5753.68 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5636.54 MB/s -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5423 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
8685.54 MB/s +14%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
7597.23 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (7333 - 7597, n=2)
7465 MB/s -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5132.02 MB/s -32%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4360 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
4294.95 MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3673 MB/s -52%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.4 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
75.56 MB/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
69.86 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.9 MB/s -4%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (62.9 - 69.9, n=2)
66.4 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
63.69 MB/s -9%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.69 MB/s -12%
4K Write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
254 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
207.25 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
200.92 MB/s
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
184.27 MB/s -8%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (162.3 - 201, n=2)
181.6 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
134.66 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2765.55 MB/s +145%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2700 MB/s +139%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2636.61 MB/s +133%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s +72%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1172.14 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1129.76 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (1122 - 1130, n=2)
1126 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2866.57 MB/s +166%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2630 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s +136%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2408.06 MB/s +123%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1088.59 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1077.68 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (1008 - 1078, n=2)
1043 MB/s -3%
Access Time Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.111 ms * -152%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05343 ms * -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.046 ms * -5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
0.044 ms *
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (0.033 - 0.044, n=2)
0.0385 ms * +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
0.036 ms * +18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * +43%
Access Time Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
0.091 ms * -379%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.067 ms * -253%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04639 ms * -144%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
  (0.019 - 0.071, n=2)
0.045 ms * -137%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.022 ms * -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
0.019 ms *
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.017 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06601320198026403300396046205280594066007260792085809240990010560112201188012540Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø9959 (5983.58-11023.65)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12928 (8511.29-13109.92)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7049 (6155.14-7094.74)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø1601 (1116.1-6275.7)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6298 (5315.65-6330.46)

Placa de vídeo

A GeForce RTX 4090 - baseada na arquitetura Ada Lovelace - é atualmente a placa de vídeo para laptop mais potente da Nvidia. Suas 9.728 unidades de shader são tão generosas quanto sua VRAM GDDR6 de 16 GB, especialmente porque a Acer selecionou o máximo de 175 watts como TGP. Mesmo assim, o desempenho da GPU no modo de desempenho fica aquém do que poderia ser possível. De forma análoga aos testes de CPU, ele atingiu 6% a menos em comparação com a média anterior do RTX 4090.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99.5 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD -1!
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
93 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
92.7 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (56764 - 73027, n=36)
65041 Points +9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63978 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61833 Points +3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59871 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
59420 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)
40513 Points -32%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
167815 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145446 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (95671 - 164399, n=12)
142108 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141676 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50532 Points +17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
50241 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40220 - 53059, n=34)
46315 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
43477 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
43140 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
42829 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)
29469 Points -32%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
22256 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (17620 - 23292, n=36)
20991 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20070 Points +7%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18814 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
18699 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)
12072 Points -36%
3DMark 11 Performance
44065 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59876 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
33907 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
18542 pontos
Ajuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)
23.1 Seconds * -78%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
14 Seconds * -8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=34)
12 Seconds * +8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
10 Seconds * +23%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)
39.2 Seconds * -118%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21 Seconds * -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=34)
18.4 Seconds * -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * -0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * -40%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
225 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
209 Seconds * +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 287, n=34)
197.8 Seconds * +12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
188 Seconds * +16%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
179 Seconds * +20%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
AMD Radeon RX 7900M, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
138 Seconds * +39%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

Os benchmarks de jogos mostram um quadro semelhante. Aqui, também, a RTX 4090 não foi capaz de usar todo o seu potencial. No entanto, isso foi suficiente para executar todos os jogos modernos com todos os detalhes em sua resolução nativa de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels. As coisas só ficam difíceis quando se joga jogos extremamente exigentes ou mal otimizados, como Lords of the Fallen. O DLSS pode ajudar nesse caso, com esse último jogo sendo executado a 72 fps em vez de 43 fps (configuração de qualidade) em QHD/Ultra, por exemplo. Muitas vezes, a RTX 4090 também teria reservas suficientes para uma tela 4K (consulte a Página da GPU).

Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
95.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
95 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
93.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
89.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
85.9 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
76.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.1 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
211.2 (165min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (139.2 - 216, n=32)
197.4 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
189.4 (165min) fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
180 fps
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
175 fps -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
167.7 (134min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=229, last 2 years)
117.3 fps -35%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
152.7 (3.46min, 111.1P1) fps +14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
139.2 (3.73min, 90.9P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.1 - 167.7, n=35)
138.7 fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
136 (8.67min, 100P1) fps +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
134 (22.7min, 90.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years)
107.7 fps -20%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
105 (4.76min, 62.5P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
184 fps +17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
182.1 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (122.2 - 194.9, n=35)
173.2 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
166.1 fps +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
157.1 fps
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
152.8 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years)
111.6 fps -29%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
385 (27.2min, 274P1) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 421, n=34)
355 fps +16%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
344 (145.8min, 227P1) fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
339 (38.9min, 245P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
331 (34.1min, 238P1) fps +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
305 (14.5min, 223P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years)
207 fps -32%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
186.4 (161.1min) fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
178.3 (150.2min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (115.7 - 220, n=37)
176.6 fps -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
174.5 (151.1min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
161.3 (135.6min) fps -10%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
146.2 (121.3min) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years)
143.1 fps -20%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
139.5 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
136.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (77.8 - 166.2, n=41)
131 fps +14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
126.1 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114.5 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years)
102.2 fps -11%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX
83.7 fps -27%
Skull & Bones - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
88 (40min) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 88, n=2)
86.5 fps +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
85 (43min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (63 - 91, n=4, last 2 years)
82 fps -4%
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
356 (23.9min, 79.5P0.1, 260P1) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (355 - 356, n=2)
356 fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
355 (9.17min, 142.2P0.1, 294P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (35.3 - 355, n=3, last 2 years)
238 fps -33%
Lords of the Fallen - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
51.9 (21.8min, 24.2P0.1, 35.3P1) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (43 - 51.9, n=2)
47.5 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
43 (15.9min, 26.7P0.1, 33.5P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 43, n=3, last 2 years)
32.1 fps -25%
Counter-Strike 2 - 2560x1440 Very High Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
188.7 (33.3min, 37.2P0.1, 66.3P1) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (156.6 - 188.7, n=2)
172.7 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
156.6 (23.8min, 40.3P0.1, 72P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (87.9 - 156.6, n=2, last 2 years)
122.3 fps -22%
Lies of P - 2560x1440 Best Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
173.1 (100.2min, 106.7P0.1, 123.6P1) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (136.4 - 173.1, n=2)
154.8 fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
136.4 (32.2min, 37.7P0.1, 67.2P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (69 - 136.4, n=4, last 2 years)
97.1 fps -29%
EA Sports WRC - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:Epic AF:16x
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
103 (13.4min, 21.3P0.1, 76.4P1) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (97.9 - 103, n=2)
100.5 fps +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
97.9 (9.79min, 32.2P0.1, 70.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (59.6 - 97.9, n=2, last 2 years)
78.8 fps -20%
Armored Core 6 - 2560x1440 Maximum Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
114.7 (33min, 52.7P0.1, 86.1P1) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 114.7, n=2)
103.4 fps +12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
92 (27.8min, 47P0.1, 68.2P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (61.4 - 92, n=5, last 2 years)
75.5 fps -18%
Atlas Fallen - 2560x1440 Very High Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
171.1 (34.7min, 42.6P0.1, 114.8P1) fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (128.3 - 171.1, n=2)
149.7 fps +17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
128.3 (23.9min, 25.6P0.1, 99.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (62.8 - 128.3, n=5, last 2 years)
86 fps -33%

Para testar como o desempenho da GPU se comporta em um período de tempo mais longo, colocamos o Helios 18 contra o jogo de RPG The Witcher 3 por cerca de 60 minutos. O resultado: Não notamos absolutamente nenhuma queda na taxa de quadros.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø174.8 (155-185)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø201 (189-215)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø181.9 (172-189)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø173.6 (165-186)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M: Ø174 (67-188)
baixo média alto ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 180.4 134 126.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 180
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 226 205 192.8 178.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 157.1 131.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 183.7 148.3 114.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 146 123 115
Strange Brigade (2018) 329 305 243
Atlas Fallen (2023) 182 161 128.3
Armored Core 6 (2023) 109.3 103.5 92
The Crew Motorfest (2023) 60 60 60
Lies of P (2023) 208 187 136.4
Counter-Strike 2 (2023) 234 189.7 156.6
Lords of the Fallen (2023) 87.3 64.2 43
EA Sports WRC (2023) 135.2 115.1 97.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) 357 356 355
Skull & Bones (2024) 133 106 85
Last Epoch (2024) 203 190 145.5

Emissões

Emissões de ruído

Um dos maiores pontos fracos do Predator Helios 18 é o controle insuficiente da ventoinha. No modo balanceado, as ventoinhas às vezes começam a girar desnecessariamente quando o laptop está em marcha lenta. No modo de desempenho e turbo, esse comportamento ocorre com ainda mais frequência e intensidade. Sob carga, o dispositivo de 18 polegadas não apresenta um comportamento fora do comum. Em uso 3D, o modo de desempenho resulta em valores audíveis, mas não exagerados, de 48 a 51 dB(A).

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 36 / 44 dB
Carga
48 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.944.246.539.841.339.72539.239.539.537.637.438.53146.448.650.648.344.546.44033363534.928.332.35033.545.142.424.925.926.66336.729.429.125.427.334.38025.729.82719182610024.43323.619.517.323.91252628.128.929.517.530.616026.928.827.223.719.12920029.335.626.124.821.732.325028.828.826.421.816.730.931528.427.12418.913.331.740032.530.524.322.811.334.350033.130.725.521.711.736.363033.331.125.52112.636.680035.433.326.420.811.138.1100036.533.825.820.611.139125037.434.426.120.610.840.4160038.13525.720.611.641.2200037.133.924.819.311.740.2250036.132.623.117.911.939.6315035.632.223.619.212.539.1400036.533.123.2171340.1500034.530.218.514.61337.6630033.928.717.313.814.139800030.925.915.113.615.335.41000028.121.613.713.214.332.21250025.616.41312.913.5271600024.515.814.71513.222.1SPL47.544.335.931.225.150.9N64.92.41.50.67.7median 33.1median 30.7median 24.3median 19.5median 13median 36.3Delta4.644.12.82.3537.535.53635.936.631.525.22727.62826.924.324.925.426.326.923.322.124.832.927.524.122.923.233.230.3292928.632.331.324.123.726.132.4292120.719.631.428.92217.315.131.431.321.514.515.23432.922.814.315.63738.824.413.613.440.737.723.111.612.842.439.728.910.711.143.340.226.59.89.345.242.229.1109.246.841.5279.79.546.343.327.7109.448.647.930.59.99.552.447.929.210.49.95347.127.51110.152.947.124.211.410.452.346.822.211.610.752.544.620.411.9115145.121.412.811.251.342.518.812.811.349.240.414.113.211.547.739.613.71311.647.737.913.913.211.445.931.213.714.110.539.957.33823.822.862.811.42.60.50.416.3median 40.4median 22.8median 11.9median 11.1median 46.85.14.31.61.964342.4414342.537.337.642.937.24042.351.550.146.745.730.634.432.627.932.540.32222.220.140.138.122.422.619.139.633.517.617.11535.431.316.815.41432.131.719.519.213.636.630.72624.516.935.532.52323.115.83532.621.318.714.53431.918.916.511.732.835.320.818.411.23636.12317.410.436.836.921.91810.937.13824.518.51138.739.22116.711.539.640.521.915.711.241.340.520.815.511.541.441.220.315.411.842.140.31915.91241.537.919.714.212.83937.516.915.713.438.637.11514.313.738.437.61617.913.24033.215.61513.43629.117.117.113.431.925.316.415.812.827.920.514.714.212.12350.532.128.624.651.67.51.61.10.68.2median 36.1median 19.7median 16.5median 12.8median 36.83.62.61.51.33.235.129.335.138253836.127.136.127.81827.828.722.628.727.316.427.327.91527.942.715.642.730.410.530.4319.93134.41434.437.610.637.636.37.936.339.16.639.138.58.138.541.27.541.243.67.743.644.98.344.947.78.647.7499.44948.89.648.848.610.148.649.210.849.250.21150.249.211.249.249.911.549.947.311.547.345.611.445.643.911.443.940.710.440.759.922.259.913.60.413.6median 43.9median 10.4median 43.95.61.45.639.131.333.433.736.134.923.335.628.827.235.123.9262424.832.92428.123.826.429.322.722.123.726.530.519.418.624.729.527.921.221.818.827.128.522.82217.927.729.522.321.71531.531.121.922.515.131.232.923.322.913.432.935.324.424.512.435.437.926.626.611.337.240.13332.610.339.539.924.524.59.439.340.122.923.28.740.24121.521.58.940.84121.521.8940.942.922.924.18.842.94220209.342.341.519.319.39.941.442.821.221.51042.241.718.317.810.341.742.71615.810.842.543.11514.711.24342.813.913.611.343.138.513.113.611.338.934.41313.211.434.331.412.412.711.431.527.612.814.210.627.453.633.433.522.453.59.41.81.80.49.4median 40.1median 21.5median 21.5median 10.8median 39.5544.21.45.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MWMSI Titan 18 HX A14VIGAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
Noise
12%
8%
12%
15%
off / environment *
25
22.8
9%
24
4%
23
8%
22.4
10%
Idle Minimum *
30
23.8
21%
27
10%
23
23%
23
23%
Idle Average *
36
23.8
34%
28
22%
23
36%
23.4
35%
Idle Maximum *
44
28
36%
32
27%
23
48%
33.5
24%
Load Average *
48
38
21%
50
-4%
45.26
6%
33.5
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
57.3
-17%
50
-2%
59.82
-22%
53.6
-9%
Load Maximum *
51
62.8
-23%
52
-2%
59.94
-18%
53.6
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

A parte inferior da superfície do gabinete do notebook é a que mais aquece. Após 60 minutos de nosso teste de estresse, medimos mais de 50 °C em determinadas partes, o que significa que o senhor não poderá jogar com o dispositivo sentado no colo. A parte superior permanece muito mais fria, com valores que chegam a 43 °C. Quando ocioso, os valores são bastante moderados - observamos uma média de 29 °C (parte superior) e 30 °C (parte inferior), o que é absolutamente bom.

 39 °C40 °C43 °C 
 38 °C40 °C39 °C 
 29 °C33 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 36.9 °C
59 °C53 °C42 °C
50 °C43 °C37 °C
29 °C24 °C27 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
Heat
8%
6%
1%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
37.8
12%
49
-14%
35
19%
40.2
7%
Maximum Bottom *
59
37.6
36%
47
20%
56
5%
37.4
37%
Idle Upper Side *
32
34.8
-9%
29
9%
34
-6%
31.6
1%
Idle Bottom *
34
36
-6%
31
9%
39
-15%
30.6
10%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Nosso teste de estresse usando as ferramentas Furmark e Prime95 não levou os componentes aos seus limites. Enquanto o Core i9-14900HX se estabilizou em cerca de 81 °C, o GeForce RTX 4090 atingiu cerca de 72 °C (hotspot de 78 °C). No entanto, o hardware pode ficar mais quente no modo de jogo devido às taxas de clock mais altas. No Witcher 3, nossas ferramentas mediram cerca de 87 °C (CPU) e 83 °C (GPU).

Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Alto-falantes

Nossa análise de áudio confirmou que o novo Predator Helios 18 soa melhor do que seu antecessor. Embora os graves ainda possam ser mais potentes, os médios e agudos agora são mais pronunciados. O volume máximo de 85 dB(A) também deve ser suficiente para a maioria dos usuários.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.345.22537.439.93144.545.34028.3315025.926.86327.326.7801824.610017.331.712517.542.616019.150.520021.754.425016.754.831513.361.340011.364.750011.767.863012.671.680011.175.3100011.174.7125010.870.6160011.673.2200011.768.8250011.973.4315012.573.24000137150001370.3630014.173.2800015.375.61000014.374.31250013.567.11600013.268.1SPL25.184.6N0.664.3median 13median 70.3Delta2.37.237.73637.728.92728.93024.93030.122.130.131.822.931.834.32934.338.723.738.743.320.743.348.517.348.557.914.557.962.914.362.968.613.668.669.611.669.672.710.772.775.99.875.980.91080.978.29.778.277.71077.775.99.975.977.610.477.676.71176.776.111.476.17611.6767511.97577.212.877.277.412.877.479.813.279.877.41377.476.113.276.17014.17089.223.889.286.70.586.7median 76.1median 11.9median 76.14.41.64.44345.437.236.946.745.927.929.720.128.319.141.81548.8145513.657.416.962.715.867.414.569.911.77111.273.310.474.810.974.41174.311.575.411.272.911.571.211.868.71261.712.86213.455.113.754.613.256.713.463.813.467.512.862.612.152.424.682.10.654.2median 12.8median 67.41.37.334.929.334.933.92533.93427.13431.11831.131.222.631.23016.43029.11529.129.615.629.631.110.531.1409.94046.11446.154.210.654.258.67.958.660.96.660.962.78.162.771.27.571.278.17.778.175.28.375.271.18.671.173.59.473.566.79.666.771.510.171.568.510.868.566116665.911.265.958.811.558.859.611.559.655.311.455.358.811.458.85410.45482.722.282.751.10.451.1median 60.9median 10.4median 60.98.51.48.534.833.434.828.935.628.924.12624.123.328.123.322.322.122.324.118.624.120.921.820.921.92221.93121.73146.622.546.656.222.956.262.324.562.367.226.667.269.232.669.27124.5717323.27372.121.572.170.221.870.271.824.171.873.62073.670.919.370.969.721.569.76517.8656815.86870.614.770.675.813.675.876.313.676.37513.27574.212.774.267.314.267.384.233.584.262.81.862.8median 70.2median 21.5median 70.25.84.25.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MWMSI Titan 18 HX A14VIGAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2Alienware m18 R1 AMD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware m18 R1 AMD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

A Acer poderia ajustar um pouco o consumo de energia do dispositivo. Apesar de sua comutação gráfica ativa, o laptop de 18 polegadas requer bastante energia no modo inativo, ou seja, de 31 a 43 watts. A maioria dos concorrentes, bem como o antigo Helios, se saem muito melhor nesse aspecto. Também pode ter havido um bug em nosso dispositivo de teste.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31 / 35 / 43 Watt
Carga midlight 144 / 318 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-3%
24%
22%
-34%
36%
Idle Minimum *
31
13.2
57%
14
55%
16
48%
30.3
2%
Idle Average *
35
25.4
27%
17
51%
19
46%
55.6
-59%
Idle Maximum *
43
53.5
-24%
24
44%
21.3
50%
101.1
-135%
Load Average *
144
151.4
-5%
143
1%
124
14%
160.3
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
228
336
-47%
251
-10%
289
-27%
216
5%
Load Maximum *
318
395.2
-24%
302
5%
319
-0%
332.1
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø228 (215-241)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø245 (230-313)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø35.2 (31.3-43)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø115.8 (101.3-221)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø227 (224-229)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø209 (195.7-240)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø210 (197.4-220)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø34.6 (31.1-42.4)

Tempos de execução

Sua alta exigência de energia leva a uma duração de bateria muito modesta. Em nosso teste WLAN com o brilho reduzido para 150 cd/m², o Predator Helios 18 durou pouco mais de 3 horas. Em comparação, o ROG Strix Scar 18 conseguiu mais de 7 horas. Em geral, sua bateria de 90 Wh não é nada pequena.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
3h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 04min
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Alienware m18 R1 AMD
R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M, 97 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
22%
80%
50%
-46%
62%
WiFi v1.3
192
252
31%
461
140%
264
38%
85
-56%
Load
64
72
13%
77
20%
103
61%
41
-36%
Reader / Idle
353
612
268
H.264
447
290

Pro

+ tela Mini-LED brilhante e rica em contraste
+ iluminação abrangente
+ ótimos dispositivos de entrada
+ gabinete de alta qualidade
+ 2x Thunderbolt 4

Contra

- a duração da bateria poderia ser melhor
- comportamento do ventilador abaixo do ideal
- alto consumo ocioso
- O SSD é estrangulado às vezes
- selo de garantia

Veredicto

Acer Predator Helios 18 2024: Dispositivo de teste fornecido pela Acer Alemanha
Acer Predator Helios 18 2024: Dispositivo de teste fornecido pela Acer Alemanha

A versão 2024 é mais uma atualização sutil do Predator Helios 18.

Em termos de desempenho, seu Core i9-14900HX e GeForce RTX 4090 praticamente não diferem do antigo Core i9-13900HX e GeForce RTX 4080. Por outro lado, sua tela WQXGA-MiniLED com uma proporção de 16:10 continua a oferecer uma qualidade de imagem impressionante (brilho, contraste, espaço de cores etc.). Além disso, há ótimos dispositivos de entrada e opções de conectividade modernas (2x Thunderbolt 4).

Os gamers exigentes com o orçamento certo terão a certeza de receber um pacote completo e despreocupado.

No entanto, em seu estado atual, o Predator Helios 18 não recebeu a classificação de "muito bom" por pouco. Além do controle da ventoinha (que, às vezes, causa irritantes vibrações), a Acer também poderia revisar o consumo de energia do laptop em modo inativo, o que atualmente ainda leva a tempos de execução escassos.

Muitos concorrentes podem não estar atualmente no mercado, mas estão pelo menos no mesmo nível do dispositivo - seja o MSI Titan 18 ou o Asus ROG Strix Scar 18.

Preço e disponibilidade

No momento em que este artigo foi escrito, o Predator Helios 18 com um Core i9-14900HX e um GeForce RTX 4090 ainda não estava disponível para compra nos Estados Unidos.

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW - 02/27/2024 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
71 / 80 → 89%
Peso
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Bateria
53 / 95 → 56%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
59 / 90 → 65%
Audio
80%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Médio
75%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do laptop Acer Predator Helios 18 2024: Novo hardware para o jogador de 18 polegadas
Florian Glaser, 2024-03- 3 (Update: 2024-03- 3)