snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise Hands-On do Portátil para Jogos MSI Alpha 15: Ryzen e Navi em vez de Intel e NVIDIA

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/06/2019

Um divisor de águas? A AMD voltou ao mundo das CPUs com sua série Ryzen, não apenas em desktops, mas também em portáteis. A empresa fez uma incursão semelhante no mercado de GPUs com suas placas de desktop Navi no início deste ano, um movimento que está tentando replicar em portáteis com suas GPUs Navi 14. A NVIDIA dominou a gama média alta de GPUs para portáteis por um tempo, mas a AMD está tentando mudar isso, oferecendo aos consumidores mais opções no processo. Continue lendo para descobrir o que pensamos de um dos primeiros portáteis completamente AMD a chegar.

MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
Processador
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX 5500M - 4096 MB, GDDR6
Memória
16384 MB 
, Dual-Channel DDR4-2400, 2 x 8 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED), IPS, 120 Hz, Brilhante: não
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, 256 GB 
,
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conectores dedicados para fones e microfone, Card Reader: SD Card (XC/HC)
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Released
10/22/2019
peso
2.3 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device Overview

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
11/2019MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
3750H, Radeon RX 5500M
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
80%07/2019Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.2 kg26.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
79%10/2019Dell G3 3590
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.5 kg21.6 mm15.6"1920x1080
77%Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.1 kg23.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%07/2019HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%05/2019Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
2.2 kg27 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%08/2019Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
2.2 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
84%08/2019HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2.4 kg23.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%05/2019Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2.1 kg20.4 mm15.6"1920x1080

Size Comparison

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg365.5 mm 254 mm 21.6 mm 2.5 kg363 mm 254.6 mm 23.9 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 256 mm 23.4 mm 2.4 kg
265
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 282 cd/m² Médio: 265.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 1506:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.29
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.15
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 (AUOD0ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G3 3590
BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
-25%
-22%
66%
58%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.1
30.4 (14, 16.4)
16%
46 (22, 24)
-27%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
-26%
8.8 (4, 4.4)
76%
16.4 (8.4, 8)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4
27.6 (17.6, 10)
-5%
32.4 (18.4, 14)
-23%
30.8 (16.8, 14)
-17%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
55%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
61%
PWM Frequency
200 (98)
25910 (20)
Screen
-34%
-20%
-15%
-5%
15%
Brightness middle
271
286.2
6%
276.2
2%
275
1%
299
10%
345
27%
Brightness
266
267
0%
261
-2%
253
-5%
290
9%
324
22%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
86
-5%
83
-9%
89
-2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.18
0.33
-83%
0.24
-33%
0.18
-0%
0.29
-61%
0.42
-133%
Contrast
1506
867
-42%
1151
-24%
1528
1%
1031
-32%
821
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.38
5.45
-24%
5.56
-27%
5.4
-23%
3.7
16%
1.3
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.6
18.08
-3%
23.45
-33%
21.3
-21%
7
60%
2.8
84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.29
4.47
-4%
5.23
-22%
4.4
-3%
2
53%
1.1
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
5.3
-152%
2.8
-33%
3.7
-76%
4.1
-95%
1.2
43%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.1 105%
2.37 93%
2.12 104%
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
CCT
6867 95%
7679 85%
6710 97%
6376 102%
7166 91%
6476 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.6
37.8
40.8
59.3
60.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.1
59
63.6
91.5
94.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -27%
-23% / -21%
-19% / -16%
31% / 8%
37% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø710 (702.9-730.11)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø740 (702.49-787.7)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø755 (746.1-761.43)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼100% +20%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
172 Points ∼98% +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼97% +16%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼89% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=534)
157 Points ∼89% +7%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
147 Points ∼84%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (135 - 157, n=4)
146 Points ∼83% -1%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼82% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=537)
839 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼96% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
801 (min: 748.64, max: 797.24) Points ∼95% +10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼95% +9%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H
790 Points ∼94% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (730 - 805, n=4)
779 Points ∼93% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points ∼90% +4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
730 (min: 702.9, max: 730.11) Points ∼87%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
730 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
85 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
147 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=230)
5242 Points ∼100% +12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
5150 Points ∼98% +10%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4973 Points ∼95% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼93% +5%
Dell G3 3590
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G
4798 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼90% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
4663 Points ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (4322 - 4732, n=4)
4571 Points ∼87% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4400 Points ∼84% -6%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4322 Points ∼82% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4781 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6613 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5167 pontos
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
99 pt ∼99%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
97.6 pt ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
88.5 pt ∼89%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
87 pt ∼87%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
86.5 pt ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
 
82.4 pt ∼82%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
79.2 pt ∼79%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.7 pt ∼65%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.7 pt ∼65%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
64.6 pt ∼65%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
64.5 pt ∼65%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
63.5 pt ∼64%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
63.4 pt ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
 
63.3 pt ∼63%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (18610 - 20940, n=18)
19913 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19553 Points ∼98% +11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17668 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (17010 - 18493, n=5)
17479 Points ∼88% -1%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17264 Points ∼87% -2%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17170 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=636)
13686 Points ∼69% -23%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13575 Points ∼68% -23%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13512 Points ∼68% -24%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼68% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13270 Points ∼67% -25%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13228 Points ∼66% -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (12388 - 13575, n=17)
13210 Points ∼66% -25%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13125 Points ∼66% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=173)
5780 Points ∼100% +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (5335 - 5931, n=16)
5615 Points ∼97% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (4867 - 5440, n=5)
5088 Points ∼88% +27%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
4925 Points ∼85% +23%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4867 Points ∼84% +22%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4000 Points ∼69%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3568 Points ∼62% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points ∼62% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3547 Points ∼61% -11%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3519 Points ∼61% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3517 Points ∼61% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (3353 - 3700, n=16)
3508 Points ∼61% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (14186 - 15482, n=18)
14726 Points ∼100% +25%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14288 Points ∼97% +22%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13355 Points ∼91% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (12903 - 13362, n=4)
13202 Points ∼90% +12%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
12903 Points ∼88% +10%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
11754 Points ∼80%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=561)
11547 Points ∼78% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼65% -19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9534 Points ∼65% -19%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9428 Points ∼64% -20%
Dell G3 3590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9315 Points ∼63% -21%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9292 Points ∼63% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (8532 - 9536, n=17)
9264 Points ∼63% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9221 Points ∼63% -22%
3DMark 06 Standard
26559 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
13344 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22490 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9963 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3900 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (51.6 - 61.3, n=15)
56.2 fps ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.2 fps ∼98% +27%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
53.1 fps ∼94% +22%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
53.1 (min: 50, max: 58, 99th percentile: 51) fps ∼94% +22%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
52.2 fps ∼93% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (48.5 - 53.1, n=4)
50.7 fps ∼90% +16%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼87% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
43.6 (min: 36, max: 48) fps ∼78%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼66% -15%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼64% -17%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼64% -17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
35.4 (min: 28) fps ∼63% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (33.1 - 38.1, n=16)
35.3 fps ∼63% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.5 (min: 32, max: 37, 99th percentile: 32) fps ∼61% -21%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.4 (min: 26) fps ∼61% -21%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (62 - 73, n=6)
66.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
62 fps ∼93% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 64, n=3)
54 fps ∼81% +2%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53 (min: 44) fps ∼79%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼73% -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼73% -8%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
44 (min: 9) fps ∼66% -17%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
43 (min: 35) fps ∼64% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (34 - 46, n=6)
42.2 fps ∼63% -20%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41 fps ∼61% -23%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
125 (min: 106) fps ∼100% +74%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
118.2 (min: 103.4) fps ∼95% +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (94.6 - 125, n=5)
112 fps ∼90% +56%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
89.9 fps ∼72% +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
82 (min: 70.2) fps ∼66% +14%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
75.7 fps ∼61% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
75.7 fps ∼61% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (58.5 - 89.9, n=5)
74.5 fps ∼60% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
73 (min: 65.1) fps ∼58% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
72 (min: 47.9) fps ∼58%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
138 fps ∼100% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (122 - 144, n=13)
136 fps ∼99% +11%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
126.3 fps ∼92% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
123 fps ∼89%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
121.6 fps ∼88% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (102 - 130, n=4)
117 fps ∼85% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
107.4 fps ∼78% -13%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
102.3 fps ∼74% -17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
90.8 fps ∼66% -26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
87.7 fps ∼64% -29%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
86.1 (min: 3) fps ∼62% -30%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
85.6 fps ∼62% -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (68.5 - 90.8, n=12)
82.1 fps ∼59% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
78.7 fps ∼57% -36%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
73.9 fps ∼54% -40%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (91 - 99, n=4)
93.8 fps ∼100% +47%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
77 fps ∼82% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (71 - 77, n=2)
74 fps ∼79% +16%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
71 fps ∼76% +11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
64 (min: 54, max: 70) fps ∼68%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
63 fps ∼67% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (59 - 65, n=5)
61.2 fps ∼65% -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
60 fps ∼64% -6%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
59 (min: 53) fps ∼63% -8%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (67.9 - 68.8, n=2)
68.4 fps ∼100% +28%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
64.8 fps ∼95% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (58.2 - 64.8, n=2)
61.5 fps ∼90% +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
60 fps ∼88% +12%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
58.2 fps ∼85% +9%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53.4 (99th percentile: 47.4) fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (45.1 - 60, n=3)
50.5 fps ∼74% -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
46.4 fps ∼68% -13%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
45.1 fps ∼66% -16%
Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
54 fps ∼100% +126%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (31.1 - 54, n=4)
40.1 fps ∼74% +68%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
33.2 fps ∼61% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (26 - 33.2, n=2)
29.6 fps ∼55% +24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
26 fps ∼48% +9%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
23.9 (min: 21, max: 26) fps ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (17.4 - 22.7, n=5)
20.1 fps ∼37% -16%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
19.4 (min: 16) fps ∼36% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
17.35 fps ∼32% -27%
Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (209 - 221, n=2)
215 fps ∼100% +23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
175 (min: 132, max: 230) fps ∼81%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
173.7 fps ∼81% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (142 - 174, n=2)
158 fps ∼73% -10%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
141.7 fps ∼66% -19%
Dell G3 3590
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
137.2 fps ∼64% -22%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
136 (min: 112) fps ∼63% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (96.4 - 150, n=5)
129 fps ∼60% -26%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
127.5 fps ∼59% -27%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
64.1 fps ∼100% +75%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
58.7 fps ∼92% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
58.7 fps ∼92% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (41.3 - 44.4, n=2)
42.9 fps ∼67% +17%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41.3 fps ∼64% +13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
36.7 (99th percentile: 14.9) fps ∼57%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
55 fps ∼100% +112%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48 fps ∼87% +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
48 fps ∼87% +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (30 - 37, n=2)
33.5 fps ∼61% +29%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
30 (min: 23) fps ∼55% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
26 fps ∼47%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
237 fps ∼100% +94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (137 - 159, n=2)
148 fps ∼62% +21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
139.3 fps ∼59% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
139 fps ∼59% +14%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
137 fps ∼58% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
122 (99th percentile: 89.3) fps ∼51%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
48.6 fps ∼100% +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.5 fps ∼85% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
41.5 fps ∼85% +17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.6 fps ∼73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (29.5 - 30.8, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼62% -15%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
29.5 fps ∼61% -17%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
52.8 fps ∼100% +54%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
47.1 fps ∼89% +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
47.1 fps ∼89% +38%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
34.2 (min: 29, max: 39) fps ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (32.1 - 33.4, n=4)
33 fps ∼63% -4%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
32.1 (min: 27) fps ∼61% -6%
Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
46.1 fps ∼100% +29%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.6 (min: 20, max: 48) fps ∼90% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (41.1 - 41.6, n=2)
41.4 fps ∼90% +16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
41.1 (min: 35, max: 48) fps ∼89% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.8 (min: 31, max: 42) fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (24.4 - 26.9, n=3)
25.8 fps ∼56% -28%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
24.4 (min: 17) fps ∼53% -32%
The Division 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
63 fps ∼100% +50%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
50 fps ∼79% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼79% +18%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼78% +17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
42 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (35 - 43, n=3)
38.3 fps ∼61% -9%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼59% -12%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
62.3 fps ∼100% +7%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
59.2 fps ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
58.4 (min: 52, max: 68) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (57.3 - 59.2, n=2)
58.3 fps ∼94% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
57.3 fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (41.8 - 44.1, n=3)
42.7 fps ∼69% -27%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41.8 (min: 33) fps ∼67% -28%
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (47 - 59, n=2)
53 fps ∼100% +71%
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
44 fps ∼83% +42%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
42 fps ∼79% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (33 - 44, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼75% +28%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
33 fps ∼62% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (22 - 43, n=5)
31.4 fps ∼59% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
31 (min: 1, max: 54) fps ∼58%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
30 (min: 1) fps ∼57% -3%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G; The Witcher 3: Ø40.9 (39-44)
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 191 137 76.3 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 201 169 123 fps
GTA V (2015) 93 48.6 20.2 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 165 72 43.6 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 93 86 81 72 53 fps
World of Warships (2015) 93 54.9 fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 151 143 59.6 fps
Overwatch (2016) 124 109 74 fps
Rocket League (2017) 175 175 72 fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 59.4 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 70 24 fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 41 35 fps
Fortnite (2018) 65 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 62 59 48 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 59 53 32 15 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 48 43 40 31 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 67.5 53.9 28.8 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 61 43.7 16.2 fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 70 49.1 32.8 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 72 51.7 28.4 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 51 47 25 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 92.3 45.4 38.1 32.2 25 fps
Anthem (2019) 48 (stuttering) 47 (stuttering) 44 (stuttering) 32 (stuttering) fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 58.4 38.1 22.8 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 51 42 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 60 46.3 23.9 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 67 55.7 53.4 15.4 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 134 69.1 48.7 35.8 19.4 6.9 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 79 74 64 64 49.1 33.3 fps
Control (2019) 119 47.5 34.2 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 76 66 47.2 35.6 23.9 6.7 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 122 122 96 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 58 53 48 26 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 81 67 36.7 29.9 15.2 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 112 94 81 64 35.4 20.1 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 63 57.7 52.3 45.8 41 14.1 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 58.6 40.1 19.8 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31.1 / 34.8 / 35.5 dB
Carga
43 / 53.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.434.23738.737.333.336.934.72531.932.332.132.230.831.63130.83131.931.829.829.13028.528.529.94031.630.227.330.630.828.428.532.25031.8292934.228.929.530.228.86332.430.930.732.230.930.229.329.68030.129.530.529.227.828.425.830.610030.928.827.826.625.824.92531.712529.827.428.525.625.123.825.229.116029.729.128.526.724.624.324.729.420032.63029.626.823.823.523.932.425033.231.530.125.623.421.621.732.931538.535.732.928.624.621.721.138.840040.23936.231.226.120.920.740.650038.336.635.529.523.519.919.839.363039.337.634.530.42419.118.93980039.537.434.631.224.72218.439.6100040.638.135.731.525.622.617.840.8125041.739.136.431.524.218.817.342160042.840.137.533.525.118.217.143.2200043.741.138.334.423.41917.143.8250044.842.34034.922.317.91745.2315042.738.834.42819.417.717.342.5400041.23833.928.719.917.71741.2500041.938.834.830.220.717.51741.963003935.13127.418.617.217.139800036.833.529.32417.317.217.136.81000033.43025.620.117.217.217.233.41250030.426.121.117.817.117.117.130.31600025.32118.617.317.117.117.125.4SPL53.550.747.843.234.731.229.953.7N9.17.564.22.21.51.49.2median 39median 36.6median 33.9median 28.6median 23.5median 19median 17.3median 39Delta4.443.52.42.62.324.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
 40 °C41 °C36 °C 
 41 °C42 °C38 °C 
 29 °C32 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C
29 °C27 °C26 °C
40 °C43 °C45 °C
23 °C27 °C29 °C
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.336.941.82531.63133.53128.528.530.64028.428.533.65029.530.231.96330.229.333.18028.425.83410024.9253912523.825.245.316024.324.747.220023.523.95025021.621.750.231521.721.159.240020.920.76550019.919.862.463019.118.973.48002218.480.5100022.617.884.1125018.817.379.9160018.217.180.820001917.180.9250017.91774.9315017.717.375.3400017.71779.1500017.51771.9630017.217.174.6800017.217.176.51000017.217.279.71250017.117.175.31600017.117.174.5SPL31.229.990.6N1.51.485.6median 19median 17.3median 74.6Delta2.3210.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Alpha 15 A3DDKApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.18 / 0.91 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11.7 / 15.7 / 22.4 Watt
Carga midlight 70.7 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G3 3590
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
32%
18%
35%
11%
43%
36%
34%
38%
Idle Minimum *
11.7
7
40%
6.2
47%
5
57%
7.4
37%
3.8
68%
4.04
65%
4
66%
3.4
71%
Idle Average *
15.7
9.9
37%
8.4
46%
7
55%
8.6
45%
6.6
58%
7.2
54%
7
55%
7.6
52%
Idle Maximum *
22.4
12
46%
27.7
-24%
11
51%
39.1
-75%
8.9
60%
11.4
49%
12
46%
10.2
54%
Load Average *
70.7
68.4
3%
91
-29%
89
-26%
65.9
7%
78.4
-11%
80.8
-14%
95
-34%
73
-3%
Load Maximum *
191
130.9
31%
131.5
31%
132
31%
141.3
26%
124
35%
144.5
24%
135
29%
140.5
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148
94.9
36%
94.4
36%
90
39%
106.9
28%
82
45%
93.6
37%
86
42%
107
28%

* ... smaller is better

Veredicto inicial

The MSI Alpha 15: The AMD Radeon RX 5500M brings a breath of fresh air to midrange gaming laptops
The MSI Alpha 15: The AMD Radeon RX 5500M brings a breath of fresh air to midrange gaming laptops

O MSI Alpha 15: A AMD Radeon RX 5500M traz um respiro de ar fresco para portáteis de jogos de gama média

Embora a MSI não tenha tentado derrubar o melhor da classe com o Alpha 15, ele desenvolveu um pacote que desafia discretamente o mercado de médio porte que a Intel e a NVIDIA dominaram até agora. Em suma, o Alpha 15 representa uma incursão inicial em um mercado no qual a AMD poderia ganhar uma posição.

A principal característica do Alpha 15 é a GPU Radeon RX 5500M, baseada na arquitetura Navi da AMD. A GPU, fabricada em um processador de 7 nm, se posiciona entre a GeForce GTX 1650 e a GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q no papel, algo que nossos testes com nosso modelo de pré-produção confirmaram. No entanto, deve-se notar que o intervalo de resultados possíveis é alto por enquanto. Por exemplo, enquanto a RX 5500M não ultrapassa o nível de uma GTX 1650 em alguns jogos, atinge os níveis da GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q em outros. No geral, ela se posiciona entre as duas, no entanto.

O MSI Alpha 15 pode competir com os portáteis Core i5-9300H e GeForce 1660 Ti Max-Q em alguns jogos com seu processador Ryzen 7 3750H e a nova GPU Radeon RX 5500M.

Se alguém pode falar se o dispositivo é um sucesso para a AMD ou MSI depende do preço pelo qual o Alpha 15 é lançado. As informações iniciais sugerem que o dispositivo será vendido por US$ 999 a US$ 1.099 para as opções de 120 e 144 Hz, preço que coloca o Alpha 15 fora do alcance dos processadores Core i5-9300H e GTX 1650, que normalmente custam bem menos de US$ 1.000. No entanto, os portáteis GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q geralmente ultrapassam US$ 1.000, o que coloca o RX 5500M em um cenário melhor. Imaginamos que a decisão entre as três GPUs também dependerá dos recursos que oferecem os portáteis nos quais eles estão.

No geral, o Alpha 15 ofereceu uma impressão positiva da Radeon RX 5500M e da arquitetura RDNA nos portáteis. Parece que a decisão entre a AMD e a NVIDIA será novamente uma escolha real, embora ainda não se saiba até que ponto a AMD pode penetrar no mercado de portáteis para jogos de gama alta. O que é certo é que GPUs de portáteis mais poderosas que o RX 5500M provavelmente estão a caminho.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise Hands-On do Portátil para Jogos MSI Alpha 15: Ryzen e Navi em vez de Intel e NVIDIA
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2019-11- 6 (Update: 2019-11-15)