Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei Matebook X Pro (i5-8250U, MX150)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

Disruptor de mercado. A Huawei quer provar que você não precisa gastar $1.500 ou mais por um XPS 13 ou um MacBook Pro decentemente especificado. O MateBook X Pro tenta dar tudo com um design fino e atraente de alumínio, tela táctil de 3: 2, gráficos Nvidia discretos, Thunderbolt 3 e um processador de classe Intel U por menos do que os principais concorrentes atualmente oferecem.

Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 (MateBook Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8250U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB, Análises do: 936 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 388.92, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3 2133 MHz
Pantalha
13.9 polegadas 3:2, 3000 x 2000 pixel 259 PPI, Capacitiva 10-pontos, Tianma XM, IPS, ID: TLX1388, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, USB-C x 2, ambos permitem a transferência de dados, carregamento e conexão com MateDock 2 e um suporta Thunderbolt 3
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14.6 x 304 x 217
Bateria
57.4 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quad speaker, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, AC adapter, USB Type-C cable, PC Manager, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.33 kg, Suprimento de energia: 135 g
Preço
1300 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: 3.5 mm audio, USB Type-C, Thunderbolt 3
Left: 3.5 mm audio, USB Type-C, Thunderbolt 3
Right: USB 3.0 (5 V/2 A)
Right: USB 3.0 (5 V/2 A)
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
665 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
660 MBit/s ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼80% -19%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼78% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼86% +8%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼80%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
504 MBit/s ∼78% -2%
431.8
cd/m²
432.8
cd/m²
391.7
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
442.7
cd/m²
410.9
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
413.6
cd/m²
407.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 464 cd/m² Médio: 428.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.53 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 442.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1428:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 9.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
95% sRGB (Argyll) 61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 1.42
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9, 3000x2000
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3, 2160x1440
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.3, 3840x2160
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
APPA033, IPS, 13.3, 2560x1600
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, 13.5, 2256x1504
Response Times
12%
-72%
14%
-10%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.4 (19.2, 21.2)
33 (15, 18)
18%
69.6 (32.4, 37.2)
-72%
30 (14, 16)
26%
42.8 (22.4, 20.4)
-6%
50.8 (25.6, 25.2)
-26%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 (11.6, 14)
24 (12, 12)
6%
44 (24.4, 19.6)
-72%
25 (14, 11)
2%
28.8 (14.8, 14)
-13%
37.2 (20, 17.2)
-45%
PWM Frequency
3759 (20)
Screen
9%
-5%
-30%
21%
9%
Brightness middle
442.7
408
-8%
478.5
8%
377
-15%
588
33%
384.2
-13%
Brightness
428
395
-8%
466
9%
339
-21%
561
31%
378
-12%
Brightness Distribution
84
88
5%
86
2%
76
-10%
92
10%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.31
0.45
-45%
0.43
-39%
0.4
-29%
0.45
-45%
0.36
-16%
Contrast
1428
907
-36%
1113
-22%
943
-34%
1307
-8%
1067
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.24
1.55
31%
3.09
-38%
3.33
-49%
1.7
24%
1.8
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.19
2.19
70%
5.94
17%
8.02
-12%
3.5
51%
4.2
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
2.06
-86%
3.5
-215%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.7
1.91
80%
2.4
75%
4.89
50%
1.9
80%
1.2
88%
Gamma
1.42 169%
2.34 103%
2.063 116%
2.37 101%
2.33 103%
2.21 109%
CCT
6227 104%
6491 100%
6883 94%
7620 85%
6738 96%
6708 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.6
61
-1%
69.47
13%
62
1%
77.92
26%
63.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
96
1%
98.36
4%
98
3%
99.94
5%
94.2
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 9%
-39% / -15%
-8% / -23%
6% / 16%
-14% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10390 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
177 Points ∼86% +21%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
165 Points ∼80% +13%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
161 Points ∼78% +10%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼76% +7%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
146 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=62)
140 Points ∼68% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼64% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼61% -14%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
116 Points ∼56% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼25% +42%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
673 Points ∼23% +30%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
639 Points ∼22% +24%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (314 - 730, n=65)
573 Points ∼19% +11%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
516 Points ∼18%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼17% 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
353 Points ∼12% -32%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
324 Points ∼11% -37%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼11% -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
2.01 Points ∼86% +21%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.9 Points ∼81% +14%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼78% +10%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.66 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (0.91 - 1.79, n=25)
1.61 Points ∼69% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼65% -8%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.48 Points ∼63% -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.2 Points ∼51% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼34% +41%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
7.24 Points ∼30% +25%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.35 Points ∼27% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (3.15 - 7.76, n=25)
6.12 Points ∼26% +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼25% +2%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.8 Points ∼24%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.96 Points ∼17% -32%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.5 Points ∼15% -40%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
6531 Points ∼60% +18%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
6345 Points ∼59% +14%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points ∼55% +7%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (5349 - 8356, n=32)
5660 Points ∼52% +2%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
5552 Points ∼51%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5433 Points ∼50% -2%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
5145 Points ∼47% -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
4913 Points ∼45% -12%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points ∼44% +30%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
21455 Points ∼43% +27%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
20666 Points ∼42% +22%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (14148 - 22097, n=32)
18529 Points ∼37% +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17971 Points ∼36% +6%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
16904 Points ∼34%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
11324 Points ∼23% -33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
9706 Points ∼20% -43%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
465.277 s * ∼5% -40%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
436.057 s * ∼5% -31%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
372.39 s * ∼4% -12%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
331.673 s * ∼4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
331.085 s * ∼4% -0%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (243 - 402, n=10)
311 s * ∼4% +6%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.67 s * ∼3% +30%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (2.5 - 7575, n=54)
1194 Seconds * ∼5% -94%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
740.35 Seconds * ∼3% -20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
722.288 Seconds * ∼3% -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
654.006 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
616.167 Seconds * ∼3%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
590.45 Seconds * ∼3% +4%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Intel Core i7-7600U
571.795 Seconds * ∼3% +7%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
505.9 Seconds * ∼2% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6416
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16904
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5552
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
60.09 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
80.97 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
516 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
3840 (min: 3824, max: 3845) Points ∼49% +11%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3728 Points ∼48% +8%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3683 Points ∼47% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
GeForce MX150, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3569 Points ∼46% +4%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3445 Points ∼44%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4880 Points ∼75% +12%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
GeForce MX150, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4613 Points ∼71% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
4461 (min: 4448, max: 4484) Points ∼68% +3%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4339 Points ∼67%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
4276 Points ∼66% -1%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4125 Points ∼63% -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
4106 Points ∼63% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
5544 (min: 5539, max: 5549) Points ∼58% +17%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4931 Points ∼52% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4865 Points ∼51% +2%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4747 Points ∼50%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3962 Points ∼42% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
4057 (min: 4055, max: 4059) Points ∼67% +17%
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3684 Points ∼60% +6%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
GeForce MX150, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3672 Points ∼60% +6%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
3507 Points ∼58% +1%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3478 Points ∼57%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3371 Points ∼55% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3071 Points ∼50% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3478 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4747 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4339 pontos
Ajuda
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Huawei MateBook X
LITEON CB1-SD256
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Apple SSD AP0128
Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
32%
2%
3%
8%
Write 4K
116.5
68.05
-42%
142.4
22%
140.57
21%
16.02
-86%
121.4
4%
Read 4K
42.18
28.95
-31%
44.08
5%
43.62
3%
22.9
-46%
33.42
-21%
Write Seq
1079
529.3
-51%
1520
41%
343.33
-68%
721.8
-33%
385.3
-64%
Read Seq
1030
711.1
-31%
1351
31%
1451.81
41%
1807
75%
1958
90%
Write 4K Q32T1
225.7
306.4
36%
436.6
93%
344.37
53%
416.5
85%
375.7
66%
Read 4K Q32T1
302.9
500.9
65%
426.6
41%
457.23
51%
538.1
78%
364.1
20%
Write Seq Q32T1
1174
496.9
-58%
1572
34%
344.3
-71%
733
-38%
1069
-9%
Read Seq Q32T1
3394
1297
-62%
3112
-8%
2885.4
-15%
3121
-8%
2564
-24%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3394 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1174 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 302.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 225.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1030 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1079 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.18 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.5 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7788 Points ∼44% +120%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8550U
6851 Points ∼39% +94%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ
5809 Points ∼33% +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3236 - 4421, n=28)
3964 Points ∼23% +12%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
3538 Points ∼20%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2734 Points ∼16% -23%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2683 Points ∼15% -24%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2395 Points ∼14% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057, max: 2200) Points ∼12% -38%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1665 Points ∼9% -53%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1404 Points ∼8% -60%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
9862 Points ∼19% +183%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8550U
7339 Points ∼14% +111%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ
5185 Points ∼10% +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2796 - 4876, n=28)
4231 Points ∼8% +21%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
3728 Points ∼7% +7%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% +2%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
3483 Points ∼7%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2613 Points ∼5% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355, max: 2425) Points ∼5% -32%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1776 Points ∼3% -49%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1528 Points ∼3% -56%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7355 Points ∼18% +168%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8550U
5329 Points ∼13% +94%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ
3721 Points ∼9% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2324 - 3739, n=26)
3306 Points ∼8% +21%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
2740 Points ∼7%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2442 Points ∼6% -11%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2310 Points ∼6% -16%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2069 Points ∼5% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484, max: 1547) Points ∼4% -44%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1100 Points ∼3% -60%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
875 Points ∼2% -68%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
44796 Points ∼24% +171%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ
22624 Points ∼12% +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (16227 - 22183, n=25)
19408 Points ∼11% +17%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
16553 Points ∼9%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8550U
16381 Points ∼9% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
15613 Points ∼8% -6%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
15186 Points ∼8% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969, max: 11750) Points ∼6% -31%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
10816 Points ∼6% -35%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
7542 Points ∼4% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
3782 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
33063 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9120 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2507 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 16286.274.227.9fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 18fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 43382017fps
Overwatch (2016) 95.24325.1fps
01234567891011121314151617181920Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high

Barulho

Ocioso
27.9 / 27.9 / 27.9 dB
Carga
36.2 / 45.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 27.9 dB(A)
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
GeForce MX150, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise
-5%
2%
-2%
4%
5%
off / environment *
27.9
30
-8%
29.1
-4%
30.2
-8%
28.2
-1%
28.3
-1%
Idle Minimum *
27.9
30
-8%
29.1
-4%
30.2
-8%
28.2
-1%
28.3
-1%
Idle Average *
27.9
30
-8%
29.1
-4%
30.2
-8%
28.2
-1%
28.3
-1%
Idle Maximum *
27.9
33.1
-19%
29.1
-4%
30.2
-8%
29
-4%
29.3
-5%
Load Average *
36.2
37.6
-4%
32.2
11%
32.9
9%
30.3
16%
32.2
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
Load Maximum *
45.2
37.6
17%
37.3
17%
39.3
13%
39.3
13%
34.5
24%

* ... smaller is better

 44.2 °C44 °C43.6 °C 
 43.2 °C47.4 °C48.6 °C 
 33 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C 
Máximo: 48.6 °C
Médio: 5.4 °C
46 °C47 °C45.6 °C
41.6 °C43 °C41 °C
38 °C37.6 °C37 °C
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.938.22534.935.83133.834.94032.9345033.332.46331.833.38030.936.910031.841.812530.146.316027.854.320027.65925027.364.331526.468.640025.370.650024.773.363024.566.38002462.6100023.668.2125023.466.616002367.520002367.1250022.966.731502362400022.764.6500022.658.9630022.660.5800022.663.21000022.655.41250022.553.21600022.546.2SPL35.578N2.545median 23.4Huawei Matebook X Pro i5median 63.2Delta2.35.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.27 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.59 / 0.62 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.5 / 8.9 / 12.3 Watt
Carga midlight 54.2 / 52.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
8250U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Power Consumption
2%
3%
32%
20%
2%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
4.6
-31%
5
-43%
3.2
9%
3.7
-6%
4.5
-29%
Idle Average *
8.9
11
-24%
8.3
7%
6.5
27%
5.2
42%
7.8
12%
Idle Maximum *
12.3
12
2%
8.8
28%
6.8
45%
7.6
38%
8.1
34%
Load Average *
54.2
39.5
27%
46.4
14%
28.2
48%
41.6
23%
52
4%
Load Maximum *
52.1
34.6
34%
48.6
7%
36
31%
50.5
3%
59
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.4

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 13min
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
8250U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-23%
3%
-10%
-7%
Reader / Idle
1243
512
-59%
819
-34%
1351
9%
1367
10%
WiFi v1.3
557
337
-39%
465
-17%
602
8%
681
22%
485
-13%
Load
133
162
22%
109
-18%
124
-7%
78
-41%
108
-19%

Pro

+ CPU e GPU significativamente mais potentes que do MateBook X
+ >95 por cento de cobertura sRGB; alto contraste, cores precisas
+ maior capacidade da bateria; duração da bateria respeitável
+ Thunderbolt de faixa completa 3, USB 3.0 tipo-A
+ Chassi de alta qualidade; tampa e base rígidas
+ Silencioso quando sob cargas leves
+ Área de superfície do trackpad grande
+ Sem modulação por largura de pulso
+ Tela táctil brilhante 3:2
+ Design fino e elegante
+ Preço atraente

Contra

- CPU incapaz de manter o Turbo Boost máximo por longos períodos
- Mais quente, mais grosso, maior e mais pesado que o MateBook X
- variante “1D12” mais lenta da GeForce MX150
- Escala de cinza muito imprecisa, de fábrica
- A resposta do teclado poderia ser mais firme
- Sem leitor de cartões, slot SIM, ou NFC
- Sem opções de dobradiça de 360 graus
- Os botões do trackpad poderiam ser mais firmes
- Barulhento durante os jogos
- Webcam inferior
- RAM soldada
In review: Huawei MateBook X Pro Core i5. Test model provided by Huawei
In review: Huawei MateBook X Pro Core i5. Test model provided by Huawei

A Huawei conseguiu criar uma fatia significativa do mercado de smartphones com seus smartphones bem recebidos e estamos começando a ver esse mesmo nível de qualidade e cuidado com a segunda geração do MateBook X. Em vez de ir cegamente por um design mais fino somente pela aparência, o MateBook X Pro se atreve a ser um pouco mais grosso do que seu antecessor em troca de gráficos discretos, uma bateria maior e um desempenho mais rápido que os usuários realmente podem sentir. O resultado final é um sistema muito equilibrado em design e potência. A Huawei só recentemente entrou no mercado mundial de portáteis há apenas um ano, mas este dispositivo já parece um produto de um fabricante veterano a par das famílias XPS, Spectre e Zenbook.

É claro que a Huawei precisa fazer mais do que apenas ser comparável à concorrência. É aí que o preço muito agressivo entra em jogo, dado que o MateBook X Pro, de nível básico, com CPU i5-8250U e gráficos integrados é vendido por $1.200, mais um vale-presente de $300. Ao todo, os usuários estariam economizando centenas quando comparado ao XPS 13 ou Spectre 13. A faixa de $900 é preenchida por portáteis tradicionais como o IdeaPad, a série Yoga 700, VivoBook, Inspiron, ou Envy onde o MateBook X Pro é, sem dúvida, uma opção mai potente que todos os mencionados anteriormente, em termos de qualidade. Os usuários que desejam gráficos dedicados da Nvidia, no entanto, terão que gastar $1.500 para obter tudo o que o portátil carro-chefe oferece.

Ainda há muito espaço para melhorias no que esperamos que aconteça para um MateBook X teórico de terceira geração. Por um lado, os marcos estreitos, peso leve e tela de vidro Gorilla Glass estão apenas gritando por um formato de 360 graus, ao estilo XPS 2-em-1 ou Yoga 920. O posicionamento da webcam não é melhor do que na série XPS. Também houve alguns recortes ocultos em termos de desempenho, como mostram os testes de estresse do processador acima, e o uso astuto de uma GPU GeForce MX150 'Max-Q' mais lenta, em vez da GeForce MX150 totalmente equipada. A falta de leitores de cartão pode irritar os criadores de conteúdo, enquanto os botões do trackpad integrado são suaves e inferiores à mesma solução na série MacBook. Se a Huawei incluísse os recursos NFC, IR e SIM, o MateBook X Pro poderia ter atraído ainda mais os usuários corporativos que valorizam a segurança e conveniência adicionais.

Sólido design digno do título de carro-chefe e uma imensa melhoria em relação ao MateBook X original, em termos de potência. As promoções pesadas do fabricante tornam o MateBook X Pro muito atraente para qualquer um que esteja considerando um Ultrabook por menos de $1000 USD. É essencialmente um portátil de alta qualidade por um preço médio.

Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 - 05/20/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
92 /  98 → 93%
Teclado
84%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
56 / 80 → 71%
Peso
71 / 35-78 → 84%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
74 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
84 / 91 → 93%
Ruído
91%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
61 / 85 → 71%
Médio
80%
88%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei Matebook X Pro (i5-8250U, MX150)
Allen Ngo, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)