Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Core i7-8750H, RTX 2070)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/21/2019

A powerful and surprisingly compact package. A ASUS é um dos primeiros fabricantes a atualizar seus portáteis de jogos com as GPUs Nvidia RTX. O GL704 é um desses modelos e é um dos portáteis de jogos de 17 polegadas mais compactos do mercado. Continue lendo para ver quanto aumento de desempenho (se houver) o RTX 2070 traz e como isso afeta o resfriamento.

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (GL704 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 417.71, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2 x 8 GB, dual-channel, max. 32 GB, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
, NVMe + Seagate ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5,400 RPM. Drive bays: 1 x M.2 & 1 x 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26.4 x 399 x 273
Bateria
66 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 x 3.5 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador de 230 W, Ferramentas Asus ROG, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.89 kg, Suprimento de energia: 620 g
Preço
2100 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

423 mm 304 mm 33 mm 3.7 kg419 mm 287 mm 33 mm 2.7 kg418.5 mm 288.7 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg411.8 mm 284.9 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS73VR 7RG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182.9 MB/s ∼100% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=218)
91.6 MB/s ∼50% +15%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.59 MB/s ∼45% +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼44%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.89 MB/s ∼43% -1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼42% -5%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.81 MB/s ∼15% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73VR 7RG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.24 MB/s ∼100% +150%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=216)
110 MB/s ∼52% +29%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.84 MB/s ∼40% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼40%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.8 MB/s ∼40% 0%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.07 MB/s ∼38% -6%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
30.98 MB/s ∼15% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus GL704GM-DH74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
664 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 MBit/s ∼98% +9%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
644 MBit/s ∼97% +8%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
605 MBit/s ∼91% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (132 - 702, n=203)
593 MBit/s ∼89% -1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
353 (min: 343, max: 359) MBit/s ∼53% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus GL704GM-DH74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼100% +85%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼96% +77%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
623 MBit/s ∼95% +75%
Average of class Gaming
  (131 - 721, n=203)
538 MBit/s ∼82% +51%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
486 MBit/s ∼74% +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼54%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
328 (min: 311, max: 338) MBit/s ∼50% -8%
287
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 299 cd/m² Médio: 291.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
Contraste: 1229:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.52
ΔE Greyscale 2.16 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080
Asus GL704GM-DH74
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 7RG
ID: CMN1747, Name: Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
CMN1747, TN LED, 1920x1080
Response Times
31%
-5%
39%
6%
27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
61%
23.6 (13.6, 10)
-34%
9 (5, 4)
49%
17.6 (10, 7.6)
-0%
12.8 (6.8, 6)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-0%
8.4 (6, 2.4)
25%
8 (6, 2)
29%
10 (4.8, 5.2)
11%
8.2 (6, 2.2)
27%
PWM Frequency
26040 (10)
25000 (20)
25770 (15)
Screen
-18%
-67%
-62%
-13%
-57%
Brightness middle
295
324.4
10%
350.9
19%
326
11%
343.6
16%
326.4
11%
Brightness
291
314
8%
311
7%
309
6%
320
10%
317
9%
Brightness Distribution
96
92
-4%
79
-18%
82
-15%
87
-9%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.35
-46%
0.33
-38%
0.27
-13%
0.34
-42%
0.28
-17%
Contrast
1229
927
-25%
1063
-14%
1207
-2%
1011
-18%
1166
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
3.82
-19%
7.7
-141%
9.11
-185%
3.74
-17%
7.83
-145%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.64
6.4
4%
14.4
-117%
14.14
-113%
5.33
20%
13.36
-101%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.52
3.32
-32%
2.62
-4%
3.49
-38%
2.83
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.16
4.3
-99%
11.1
-414%
11.17
-417%
3.7
-71%
10.9
-405%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
2.11 104%
2.28 96%
2.36 93%
1.97 112%
CCT
6872 95%
7366 88%
11813 55%
12475 52%
6388 102%
11056 59%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
57.5
1%
77.74
36%
76
33%
58
2%
75.8
33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
88.8
2%
100
15%
100
15%
90
3%
100
15%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / -11%
-36% / -56%
-12% / -47%
-4% / -10%
-15% / -44%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9802 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1041 (976.49-1204.86)
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (957.01-1046.68)
MSI GL73 8SE-010US Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø920 (906.29-1034.2)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus GL704GM-DH74
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H
169 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
154 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 212, n=445)
153 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1239 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼97%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼91% -6%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1074 Points ∼87% -11%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H
997 Points ∼80% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=446)
775 Points ∼63% -36%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points ∼60% -39%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1204 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5939 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼94%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5118 Points ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=143)
5062 Points ∼85% -9%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5053 Points ∼85% -9%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5049 Points ∼85% -9%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4891 Points ∼82% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5968 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5668 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points ∼95%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5359 Points ∼90% -5%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5340 Points ∼89% -6%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
5215 Points ∼87% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=335)
4967 Points ∼83% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5557 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points ∼87%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4394 Points ∼79% -10%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4357 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=353)
4244 Points ∼76% -13%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4231 Points ∼76% -13%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
3876 Points ∼70% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4861 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7941 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5663 pontos
Ajuda
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus GL704GM-DH74
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-1%
-19%
1%
29%
-43%
Write 4K
99.64
96.76
-3%
141.3
42%
104.7
5%
110.7
11%
71.19
-29%
Read 4K
48.99
39.82
-19%
41.02
-16%
37.39
-24%
35.49
-28%
32.7
-33%
Write Seq
972.1
1197
23%
506.5
-48%
865.7
-11%
1665
71%
404.5
-58%
Read Seq
1515
1166
-23%
538.8
-64%
944.1
-38%
1284
-15%
8.3
-99%
Write 4K Q32T1
280.62
247.3
-12%
362.8
29%
293.3
5%
340.2
21%
204
-27%
Read 4K Q32T1
327.79
314.3
-4%
402.8
23%
374.3
14%
407.5
24%
303.2
-8%
Write Seq Q32T1
969.7
1302
34%
524.3
-46%
1064
10%
2038
110%
386.5
-60%
Read Seq Q32T1
1756.7
1688
-4%
552.9
-69%
2616
49%
2367
35%
1214
-31%
AS SSD
6%
-23%
14%
83%
-53%
Score Total
1715
2008
17%
1064
-38%
2335
36%
4142
142%
1061
-38%
Score Write
942
806
-14%
417
-56%
767
-19%
2147
128%
385
-59%
Score Read
510
788
55%
421
-17%
1080
112%
1304
156%
456
-11%
Access Time Write *
0.045
0.04
11%
0.032
29%
0.047
-4%
0.047
-4%
0.09
-100%
Access Time Read *
0.11
0.141
-28%
0.051
54%
0.191
-74%
0.071
35%
0.237
-115%
4K-64 Write
726.69
593.15
-18%
273.64
-62%
591.16
-19%
1866.02
157%
285.72
-61%
4K-64 Read
326.47
648.86
99%
337.66
3%
847.73
160%
1124.72
245%
354.32
9%
4K Write
122.81
92.88
-24%
96.85
-21%
88.41
-28%
84.44
-31%
56.58
-54%
4K Read
52.43
28.76
-45%
33.69
-36%
20.59
-61%
31.66
-40%
21.91
-58%
Seq Write
927
1203.75
30%
465.12
-50%
871.22
-6%
1962.09
112%
427.59
-54%
Seq Read
1315
1101.86
-16%
497.89
-62%
2120.09
61%
1472.55
12%
793.63
-40%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 3%
-21% / -21%
8% / 9%
56% / 60%
-48% / -49%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1756.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 969.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 327.79 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 280.62 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1515 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 972.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.99 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.64 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Turbo Mode)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25202 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24172 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼90% -6%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21380 Points ∼85% -12%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
20157 Points ∼80% -17%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18642 Points ∼74% -23%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15436 Points ∼61% -36%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14534 Points ∼58% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=547)
12476 Points ∼50% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7431 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
5783 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=94)
5263 Points ∼71% -29%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4476 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
4124 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
3351 Points ∼75% -25%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
3278 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (259 - 10111, n=133)
3142 Points ∼70% -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19236 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16131 Points ∼84% -16%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
15731 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14663 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
12281 Points ∼64% -36%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11752 Points ∼61% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=473)
10673 Points ∼55% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
19085 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16810 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
8788 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7182 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
99.7 fps ∼100% +39%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
75.4 (min: 62) fps ∼76% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
71.8 fps ∼72%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
61.7 fps ∼62% -14%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
57 fps ∼57% -21%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
55.1 fps ∼55% -23%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
51.3 fps ∼51% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=247)
46.7 fps ∼47% -35%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
41.8 fps ∼42% -42%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
24 fps ∼24% -67%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
169.6 fps ∼100% +27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
133.6 fps ∼79%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
104.3 fps ∼61% -22%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
98.2 fps ∼58% -26%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
83 fps ∼49% -38%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
80.5 fps ∼47% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=209)
79.6 fps ∼47% -40%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
53.9 fps ∼32% -60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
106 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
91 fps ∼86%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
87 fps ∼82% -4%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
75 (min: 41) fps ∼71% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (25 - 123, n=16)
66.8 fps ∼63% -27%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
65 fps ∼61% -29%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
111 fps ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
92 fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (31 - 134, n=14)
71.1 fps ∼64% -23%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
70 fps ∼63% -24%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
109 fps ∼100%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
87 fps ∼80% -20%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
83.5 fps ∼77% -23%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
68.3 fps ∼63% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 159, n=155)
65.6 fps ∼60% -40%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
60.9 fps ∼56% -44%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
130.7 fps ∼100%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
103 fps ∼79% -21%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
97.7 fps ∼75% -25%
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
81.4 fps ∼62% -38%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
74.4 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.6 - 189, n=120)
72.9 fps ∼56% -44%
Battlefield V
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
117.4 fps ∼100% +61%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
112 (min: 95) fps ∼95% +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.4 - 122, n=9)
81.8 fps ∼70% +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼62%
1920x1080 High Preset
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
118.3 fps ∼100% +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 130, n=8)
82.8 fps ∼70% +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
77.7 fps ∼66%
Darksiders III
1920x1080 Epic
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
102.9 fps ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
94.7 fps ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.6 - 121, n=11)
74.1 fps ∼72% -22%
1920x1080 High
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
104.2 fps ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
98.5 fps ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.8 - 126, n=11)
79.3 fps ∼76% -19%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)
baixo média alto ultra
GTA V (2015) 163.4155.7126.671.4fps
Dirt Rally (2015) 254.5160.6199.7113.6fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 255.3204.1133.671.8fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 129.7120.7115109.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 210.5158.6130.7109fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 165.4141.5120.6113.3fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 84727164fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 119959291fps
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 13711311294fps
Battlefield V (2018) 111.68677.773fps
Darksiders III (2018) 169.2102.498.594.7fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 169.5129.396.191.3fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 32 / 40 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
46 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
Noise
-3%
7%
3%
6%
3%
off / environment *
29
28.2
3%
28
3%
30.5
-5%
27.8
4%
28.6
1%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
29.4
-1%
32.1
-11%
31.1
-7%
33.8
-17%
Idle Average *
32
31.8
1%
30.7
4%
32.1
-0%
31.1
3%
34
-6%
Idle Maximum *
40
34.6
13%
34
15%
32.3
19%
35
12%
34.1
15%
Load Average *
46
56
-22%
42
9%
42.9
7%
42
9%
36.5
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
54.2
-6%
45.8
10%
44.5
13%
47.8
6%
Load Maximum *
52
56.7
-9%
45.8
12%
48.8
6%
46.5
11%
52.2
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 59 °C56 °C57 °C 
 38 °C44 °C47 °C 
 28 °C29 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C
54 °C51 °C53 °C
51 °C47 °C47 °C
26 °C30 °C27 °C
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-0.3 °C / -0.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.145.52536.641.33128.330.74031.433.5503627.86326.7328030.738.610028.252.912524.752.116022.756.220023.463.525023.165.531520.366.340018.764.650017.866.86301868.380017.368.6100017.468.6125017.966.7160017.765.8200017.165.2250017.265.3315017.466.1400017.362.5500017.661630017.660800017.362.11000017.357.91250017.251.41600017.143.1SPL29.977.4N1.343.6median 17.6median 64.6Delta1.74.140.338.137.236.13634.334.332.733.433.531.531.630.432.329.836.828.34427.256.427.660.726.962.225.560.826.260.225.260.425.164.924.367.924.366.523.963.823.959.723.759.423.657.323.557.823.360.223.357.923.36623.265.623.258.823.151.323.642.53674.82.637.6median 23.9median 60.21.52.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GWAsus GL704GM-DH74
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus GL704GM-DH74 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 2.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 19 / 22 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 102 / 231 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
14%
29%
28%
33%
3%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
19
15.2
20%
8.8
54%
10.1
47%
9.3
51%
17.8
6%
20 (3.8 - 113, n=633)
-5%
Idle Average *
22
20.4
7%
16.2
26%
18.3
17%
14.8
33%
24.7
-12%
25.5 (6.8 - 119, n=633)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
29
27.3
6%
18.3
37%
19.6
32%
22
24%
29.6
-2%
30.6 (8.3 - 122, n=633)
-6%
Load Average *
102
92.9
9%
86.1
16%
87.6
14%
63
38%
110
-8%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=624)
-2%
Load Maximum *
231
190.6
17%
186.4
19%
160.7
30%
187
19%
178.6
23%
168 (21.9 - 590, n=623)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
190
143
25%
146.7
23%
136.3
28%
167.8
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 12min
Battery Runtime The Witcher 3 ultra
0h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
3h 55min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 07min
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 66 Wh
Asus GL704GM-DH74
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 66 Wh
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 51 Wh
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 62 Wh
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 86 Wh
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, 41 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
7%
-13%
24%
8%
-25%
6%
Reader / Idle
372
427
15%
349
-6%
411
10%
268
-28%
388
4%
334 (39 - 1174, n=616)
-10%
WiFi v1.3
235
255
9%
191
-19%
321
37%
253
8%
168
-29%
251 (78 - 622, n=296)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra
52
56.7 (52 - 66, n=3)
9%
Load
67
64
-4%
57
-15%
84
25%
97
45%
33
-51%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=582)
17%
H.264
320
245 (88 - 506, n=130)

Pro

+ Compacto para um portátil de 17 polegadas
+ Painel FHD mate
+ Tempos de resposta curtos
+ Taxa de atualização de 144 Hz
+ Desempenho impressionante
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Fácil de reparara e manter

Contra

- Ventoinhas barulhentas e perturbantes
- Altas temperaturas
- Localização desconfortável da webcam
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
The ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.
The ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

O ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW é um portátil extraordinariamente compacto e potente. Seu formato é apenas um pouco maior do que a maioria dos portáteis de jogos de 15,6 polegadas, e é notavelmente menor do que todos, exceto o MSI GS73VR 7RG de nossos dispositivos de comparação. É ainda mais impressionante que a ASUS também tenha inserido uma GPU GeForce RTX 2070 e não a versão Max-Q.

Nossa unidade de teste obteve excelentes resultados em nossos testes e consegue rodar todos os jogos triple-A modernos em 1080p com gráficos máximos. As únicas desvantagens são que o dispositivo funciona quente e barulhento, tanto que os ventiladores abafam os alto-falantes durante os jogos. O GL704GW também limita drasticamente a bateria, mas isso é uma queixa menor, já que a bateria dura apenas cerca de uma hora sob carga contínua. É uma pena que os ventiladores sejam tão barulhentos, dado que a ASUS equipou o GL704GW com alto-falantes decentes.

As vezes menos é mais. O ASUS ROG Strix Cicatriz II GL704GW é um impressionante portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas, mas a versão RTX 2070 funciona tão quente e barulhento que você pode estar melhor com o modelo RTX 2060.

A ASUS equipou o GL704GW com a mesma tela de 144 Hz que ela usou no GL704GM, que continua a nos impressionar com seus baixos tempos de resposta e sua excelente precisão de cor. O design agressivo e industrial da carcaça não será para todos, mas você seria duramente pressionado para encontrar um portátil de jogos de 17 polegadas mais compacto que oferece o mesmo desempenho do GL704GW. Resumindo, o ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW é um excelente portátil para jogos, com poucos inconvenientes, além de ventiladores barulhentos e altas temperaturas.

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW - 02/18/2019 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
75%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
80%
Médio
79%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Core i7-8750H, RTX 2070)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-02-21 (Update: 2019-02-21)