Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Nitro 5 (Ryzen 7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X, FHD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/03/2018

A rare sight. Embora a Intel e a Nvidia ainda sejam responsáveis pelo segmento de gama alta, a AMD está bem posicionada em portáteis acessíveis. O melhor exemplo é o Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42 com uma Ryzen 7 2700U e Radeon RX 560X, que pode ser adquirido por menos de 1000 Euros (~$1132). Será que os concorrentes precisam tremer? Vamos descobrir!

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 (Nitro 5 Serie)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1275 MHz, Memoría: 1450 MHz, GDDR5, Crimson 17.7, Enduro
Memória
8192 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, single channel, 1 de 2 slots ocupados, 32 GB max.
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN06.0 (AUO60ED), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
SK Hynix HFS128G39TND, 128 GB 
, SATA-III-SSD + TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm; slots: 1x M.2 & 1x 2.5 inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ AMD K17.1 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4 (a/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 390 x 266
Bateria
48 Wh, 3320 mAh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 135-watts, guia rápido, panfleto de garantia, diversas ferramentas do fabricante, Dolby Audio, Mozilla Firefox, Norton Security trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 480 g
Preço
900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.1 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
70.4 MB/s ∼88% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
70 MB/s ∼87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=153)
57.2 MB/s ∼71% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
 
21.4 MB/s ∼27% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88.1 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼96%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼94% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=150)
74.7 MB/s ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
 
17.4 MB/s ∼20% -80%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
618 (min: 446, max: 680) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
585 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=112)
496 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
174 MBit/s ∼25% -75%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 534, max: 664) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
520 MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
471 MBit/s ∼73% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=111)
469 MBit/s ∼72% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
48 MBit/s ∼7% -91%
268
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 305 cd/m² Médio: 283.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299 cd/m²
Contraste: 1246:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 3.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.58 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.55
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AU Optronics B156HAN06.0 (AUO60ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
LG Philips LGD0573 LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1080
Response Times
17%
0%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48.4 (24, 24.4)
42 (22, 20)
13%
45 (24, 21)
7%
47.9 (22.4, 25.5)
1%
Response Time Black / White *
32.8 (18, 14.8)
26 (15, 11)
21%
35 (19, 16)
-7%
33.7 (19.2, 14.5)
-3%
PWM Frequency
20000 (90)
21800 (99)
Screen
-14%
-5%
-2%
Brightness middle
299
270
-10%
296
-1%
296
-1%
Brightness
284
250
-12%
268
-6%
288
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
81
-8%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.25
-4%
0.3
-25%
0.32
-33%
Contrast
1246
1080
-13%
987
-21%
925
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.98
4.79
4%
4.01
19%
4.3
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.67
8.83
-15%
8.7
-13%
8.7
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.7
4
-8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.58
5.66
-24%
0.98
79%
3
34%
Gamma
2.55 86%
2.64 83%
2.35 94%
2.1 105%
CCT
6397 102%
7179 91%
6408 101%
7100 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
37
-35%
38
-33%
56.83
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
59
-32%
58
-33%
86.86
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2% / -9%
-3% / -4%
-2% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Software
Latencies
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Core i5-8265U
159 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
150 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 (min: 144.66, max: 144.78) Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=337)
124 Points ∼78% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
661 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
576 (min: 544.28, max: 575.47) Points ∼87% -13%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Core i5-8265U
524 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=348)
458 Points ∼69% -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼50% -50%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Core i5-8265U
1.87 Points ∼100% +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1.71 Points ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.39 - 2.16, n=410)
1.288 Points ∼69% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
7.53 Points ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Intel Core i5-8265U
5.52 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.59 - 17.6, n=676)
3.7 Points ∼49% -51%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U: Ø658 (642.69-661.47)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø487 (482.49-523.51)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø548 (544.28-575.47)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.53 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
150 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
661 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
GeForce MX150, 8265U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3960 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=69)
3820 Points ∼96% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
3763 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3686 Points ∼93% -2%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
GeForce MX150, 8265U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4924 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4882 Points ∼99% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
4810 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4746 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=254)
4239 Points ∼86% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4464 Points ∼100% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
3860 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3766 Points ∼84% -2%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
GeForce MX150, 8265U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3725 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=274)
3352 Points ∼75% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3860 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4810 pontos
Ajuda
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
AS SSD
386%
57%
353%
Score Total
600
35
-94%
850
42%
2991
399%
Score Write
194
710
266%
388
100%
723
273%
Score Read
274
1881
586%
305
11%
1509
451%
4K-64 Write
127.11
1651.81
1200%
276.74
118%
470.11
270%
4K-64 Read
203.12
485.66
139%
236.2
16%
1311.67
546%
4K Write
54.49
113.93
109%
72.21
33%
144.75
166%
4K Read
23.64
51.42
118%
19.47
-18%
49.82
111%
Seq Write
126.79
1225.8
867%
390.22
208%
1077
749%
Seq Read
470.8
1806.27
284%
490.6
4%
1471
212%
SK Hynix HFS128G39TND
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 511.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 135.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 215.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 135.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 498.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 135.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.16 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.01 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
6262 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
5705 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
3613 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
3263 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=381)
2693 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
8451 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8329 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
4558 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
4252 Points ∼50% -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=605)
2791 Points ∼33% -67%
3DMark 06 Standard
22783 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
19829 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
7640 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
56030 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
13326 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5316 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530Tooltip
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND; The Witcher 3: Ø21.3 (17-23)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; The Witcher 3: Ø19.6 (16-21)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U
20.6 fps ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7200U
19.6 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 51.5, n=79)
18.1 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U
10.9 fps ∼53% -47%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
GeForce MX150, 8265U
10.7 fps ∼52% -48%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7200U
34.1 fps ∼100% +3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U
33.2 fps ∼97%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 93.2, n=89)
27 fps ∼79% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U
19.3 fps ∼57% -42%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
GeForce MX150, 8265U
19.3 fps ∼57% -42%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 97.268.433.220.6fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 16614584.176.6fps
The Division (2016) 87.773.136.828.7fps
Doom (2016) 54.853.734.832.8fps
Overwatch (2016) 2051789546.9fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 87.66537.332.8fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 62.955.327.813.8fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 133107fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 59.354.733.829.1fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 18486.154.646.2fps
For Honor (2017) 12247.445.334.9fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 62.334.932.115.3fps
Prey (2017) 90.965.351.643.8fps
Rocket League (2017) 18211982.8fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 15783.250.928.6fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 11050.341.830fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 84433123fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 35.725.423.723fps
ELEX (2017) 49.441.934.225.7fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 87.376.750.140.9fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 71.552.543.640.8fps
Fortnite (2018) 77.166.443.933fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 49.627.211.8fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 64.635.32920.7fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 55383532fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 5344.641.637.9fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 61.232.528.522.4fps
F1 2018 (2018) 94564731fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 54272623fps
FIFA 19 (2018) 127109105100fps
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 90524938fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 30252116fps
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 8749.14220.3fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 40.135.232.231.4fps
Fallout 76 (2018) 59.438.834.129.9fps
Battlefield V (2018) 95.349.641.336.5fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 86.469.347.427fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 31 / 32 dB
HDD
31 dB
Carga
36 / 46 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
8265U, GeForce MX150
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150
Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
1%
-2%
-3%
-2%
off / environment *
29
30.3
-4%
30.5
-5%
31
-7%
31.7 (22 - 304, n=149)
-9%
Idle Minimum *
29
30.3
-4%
30.5
-5%
31
-7%
31.2 (27.8 - 40.1, n=950)
-8%
Idle Average *
31
30.3
2%
30.5
2%
31
-0%
32 (27.8 - 42.2, n=952)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
32
30.3
5%
30.9
3%
32.6
-2%
32.7 (27.8 - 47, n=952)
-2%
Load Average *
36
39.2
-9%
41.2
-14%
41.6
-16%
36.4 (29 - 51.8, n=952)
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
41.6
5%
41.6
5%
Load Maximum *
46
39.2
15%
41.9
9%
44.7
3%
42 (32.5 - 62.7, n=952)
9%

* ... smaller is better

 46 °C47 °C42 °C 
 45 °C45 °C32 °C 
 29 °C28 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
44 °C44 °C39 °C
29 °C37 °C37 °C
25 °C25 °C24 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
8265U, GeForce MX150
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150
Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
18%
-8%
6%
-0%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
41.2
12%
52.9
-13%
43.8
7%
41.6 (27.2 - 71, n=906)
11%
Maximum Bottom *
44
36.4
17%
51.5
-17%
44.9
-2%
45 (28.5 - 82, n=906)
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
30
22
27%
28.4
5%
25.9
14%
29.8 (21.1 - 40.2, n=759)
1%
Idle Bottom *
28
23.6
16%
29.7
-6%
26.3
6%
31 (21.5 - 44.4, n=759)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.8342527.431.53127.729.94028.429.85026.726.76325.525.38025.631.410024.943.312521.545.216021.646.620021.354.925020.861.331519.363.840018.464.150018.364.963017.566.980017.571.5100017.870.4125018.368.4160018.367.9200017.168.4250017.466.1315017.758.7400017.863.250001861.6630017.961.8800017.762.31000017.760.61250017.558.21600017.451.1SPL3078.4N1.343.8median 17.9median 62.3Delta1.35.13232.33232.632.732.633.134.333.130.430.230.432.932.732.929.226.229.226.826.926.826.524.526.52525.2252722.72735.422.135.453.32253.360.420.160.463.219.763.261.819.261.861.718.961.768.718.368.768.117.868.164.417.664.466.817.366.864.617.564.66117.76159.217.959.256.817.956.85518.15553.618.453.661.918.561.967.918.567.966.118.466.157.418.557.475.930.375.934.11.234.1median 61median 18.5median 617.21.17.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7 / 10 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 79 / 128 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
8265U, GeForce MX150
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
41%
45%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
7
9.9
-41%
3.8
46%
3.7
47%
11.7 (2.6 - 101, n=906)
-67%
Idle Average *
10
9.5
5%
6.3
37%
7.5
25%
16.3 (4.2 - 122, n=906)
-63%
Idle Maximum *
18
10.7
41%
9.6
47%
8
56%
19.8 (4.7 - 181, n=906)
-10%
Load Average *
79
62
22%
59.5
25%
49
38%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=885)
24%
Load Maximum *
128
86.7
32%
64.4
50%
55.2
57%
77.9 (20.1 - 329, n=890)
39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
98
84
14%
50.6
48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 40min
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 48 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 40 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
8265U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
25%
32%
76%
3%
Reader / Idle
963
846
393 (73 - 1810, n=867)
WiFi v1.3
340
425
25%
450
32%
597
76%
351 (96 - 942, n=222)
3%
Load
50
101
122
84.8 (32 - 238, n=867)
H.264
552
401
632
346 (114 - 915, n=98)
Witcher 3 ultra
83
75.9 (62 - 94, n=9)

Pro

+ Duração decente da bateria graças ao hardware eficiente
+ Relação de preço-desempenho convincente
+ Bom painel IPS

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3 e USB 3.1 Gen2
- RAM de apenas um canal
- SSD fraco durante a escritura
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Os entusiastas da AMD que ansiavam por um portátil multimídia adequado com ambições de jogo estão no endereço certo com o Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0.

Ok, você pode ver várias medidas de recorte de custos (bateria pequena, conexões escassas, SSD fraco durante a gravação, apenas 8 GB de RAM), mas pelo preço de apenas 900 Euros (~$1019), o portátil de 15 polegadas é um ótimo negócio.

A combinação da Ryzen 7 2700U e Radeon RX 560Xtraz energia suficiente para a maioria das aplicações, embora durante os jogos, suas expectativas sobre a qualidade dos gráficos e as taxas de quadros não sejam muito altas.

Em resumo, com a versão AMD do Nitro 5, a Acer oferece uma alternativa bonita e bem sucedida aos portáteis estabelecidos baseados na Intel/Nvidia. Infelizmente, algo assim não acontece com muita frequência. Afinal, a concorrência é boa para os negócios.

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 - 11/30/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 65%
Peso
60 / 20-67 → 86%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
86 / 85 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
86 / 95 → 91%
Audio
75%
Médio
78%
85%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Acer Nitro 5
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Nitro 5 (Ryzen 7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X, FHD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-12- 3 (Update: 2018-12- 5)