Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Inspiron 15 7559
Dell Inspiron 15 7559 (Inspiron 15 7000 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1176 MHz, Memoría: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 353.62, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR3L 1600, Dual-Channel, ambos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel, 10 pontos, LG Philips LGD04D9 / 156UD2 / Dell P/N: 53FC4, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
SK hynix SC300 M.2, 128 GB
, + 1 x Seagate ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
peso
2.67 kg, Suprimento de energia: 514 g
Preço
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LGD04D9 / 156UD2 / Dell P/N: 53FC4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 299 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 273.2 cd/m²iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 276 cd/m²
Contraste: 354:1 (Preto: 0.78 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.68 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -23% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.4 | 63.6 0% | 47.47 -25% | 67.6 7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 82 -9% | 71.5 -21% | 97 8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 59.9 -7% | 49.05 -24% | 69.8 8% |
| Response Times | -11% | -20% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 50 ? -56% | 43.2 ? -35% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 17 ? 35% | 27.2 ? -5% | |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 30% | -8% | 38% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 328 19% | 302 9% | 300 9% |
| Brightness | 273 | 310 14% | 307 12% | 282 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 86 1% | 87 2% | 90 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.78 | 0.33 58% | 0.79 -1% | 0.35 55% |
| Contrast | 354 | 994 181% | 382 8% | 857 142% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 4.74 -17% | 5.4 -33% | 1.8 56% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.68 | 3.15 33% | 5.99 -28% | 2.18 53% |
| Gamma | 2.55 86% | 2.51 88% | 2.32 95% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6871 95% | 6336 103% | 6670 97% | 6837 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 54 -7% | 45 -22% | 64 10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 82 -9% | 71 -21% | 97 8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
17% | -17% /
-13% | 23% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17942 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| PCMark 7 | |
| Score (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Productivity (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5636 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2907 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3840 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| AS SSD | |
| Seq Read (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| 4K Read (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| 4K-64 Read (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | |
| Read Seq (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Read 4k (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| Read 4k QD32 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
SK hynix SC300 M.2
Sequential Read:
489.9 MB/s
Sequential Write:
205.1 MB/s
512K Read:
354.3 MB/s
512K Write:
211.5 MB/s
4K Read:
27.84 MB/s
4K Write:
68 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
348.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
198.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5572 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16805 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4026 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 119.7 | 43.6 | |||
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 52.7 | ||||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 63 | 34 | 24 | ||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 117.1 | 24.6 | 10.2 | 9.9 | |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 72.1 | 36.2 | 31.5 | 10.4 | |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 96 | 55.6 | 31.9 | 24.7 | 10 |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 88.4 | 41.1 | 34.4 | 11.8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 59 severe graphical problems | 47 severe graphical problems | 30 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.6 / 32.6 dB |
| HDD |
| 32.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.5 / 49.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distância) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SK hynix SC300 M.2 | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, SanDisk SD7SN3Q128G1002 | MSI PE60-2QEi581 GeForce GTX 960M, 4210H, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 36% | -17% | -55% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.4 | 5.2 45% | 15.6 -66% | 21.8 -132% |
| Idle Average * | 14.4 | 9.4 35% | 20.5 -42% | 26.1 -81% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15 | 10.8 28% | 21.2 -41% | 26.6 -77% |
| Load Average * | 102 | 60 41% | 75.8 26% | 88.5 13% |
| Load Maximum * | 120 | 80.9 33% | 72.9 39% | 119.7 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9.4 / 14.4 / 15 Watt |
| Carga |
102 / 120 Watt |
   
| |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 (sort by value) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7559 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H | |
| MSI PE60-2QEi581 | |
Pro
+ Chassi elegante
+ Superfícies convenientes
+ Sem problemas óbvios de construção
+ Ótimas opções de manutenção
+ Bom touchpad, mas funcionalidade limitada
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Tela táctil IPS 4K com
+ Muito bom desempenho de jogos e aplicativos
Contra
- Não muito resistente a torções
- Fortes rangidos quando tenta flexioná-lo
- Sem drive ótico
- Teclado medíocre
- A função táctil nem sempre é muito útil
- Tela muito refletiva
- Utilização do Turbo não ideal
- Controle da ventoinha às vezes irritante
- Consumo (muito) alto de energia sob carga de trabalho
We haJá mencionamos que a muito boa impressão inicial do bastante caro Dell Inspiron 15 7559 (1299 Euros/~$1376) sofreu um pouco durante nossa análise. O touchpad, que, de fato, é muito bom, revelou um problema de qualidade de construção, e o teclado muito suave decepcionou o autor. O chassi visualmente perfeito é ótimo (questão de gosto), mas devia ter sido mais sólido. As unidades óticas podem ser menos populares, mas esperávamos uma devido ao tamanho e à orientação multimídia. O controlador do touchpad é uma piada de mal gosto, e o controle pulsante da ventoinha somente pode ser desligado com restrições no desempenho. O autor também pensa que o uso de telas tácteis caras, que possuem uma superfície refletiva, não faz muito sentido para um não-conversível. Outra questão e se você realmente pode se beneficiar da alta resolução de um aparelho de 15 polegadas ou se há apenas desvantagens como problemas de dimensionamento e o preço alto.
Os aspectos positivos incluem a boa tela com os amplos ângulos de visão, alto desempenho e a construção com opções de manutenção muito simples, pela qual consegue acessar facilmente todos os componentes importantes, incluindo a ventoinha removendo apenas a escotilha de manutenção.
Muitos portáteis, incluindo algumas máquinas para jogos, deveriam tomar ele como um exemplo. A pontuação final é de "apenas" 82%, portanto, não podemos realmente recomendar este portátil, dado que o Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 (85%) é, em nossa opinião, o pacote mais atraente pelo mesmo preço, apesar da tela convencional, porém, mate Full HD e apenas dois GB de VRAM.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Dell Inspiron 15 7559
-
03/10/2016 v5(old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
