Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15 XA: Com painel OLED e 4K em um novo design

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/31/2019

Gráficos RTX em uma carcaça fina. Embora a Gigabyte tenha discretamente mudado o design de seus portáteis Aero, permanece fiel à sua linha anterior. Com o Aero 15 OLED XA, os compradores são recebidos por um portátil fino e potente com muitas conexões. Descobrimos em nosso teste exatamente o que você pode esperar.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA (Aero 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 855 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 431.11, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual channel, 2 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, UHD, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L, 512 GB 
, PCIe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280, 433 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinada, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD (UHS-II)
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356 x 250
Bateria
94.24 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes de 2 watts, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 watts, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.214 kg, Suprimento de energia: 722 g
Preço
2700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA

Size Comparison

360 mm 249 mm 26 mm 2.1 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
Left side: HDMI 2.0, 1x USB 3.1 Type-C mit DP 1.4, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined audio port, GigabitLAN
Left side: HDMI 2.0, 1x USB 3.1 Type-C mit DP 1.4, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined audio port, GigabitLAN
Right side: 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, power connection
Right side: 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, power connection
Back: no connections
Back: no connections
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
195 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=238)
92.7 MB/s ∼47% -52%
Medion Erazer X15805
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼39% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=236)
111 MB/s ∼46% -54%
Medion Erazer X15805
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Aorus 15 W9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
666 (min: 651, max: 683) MBit/s ∼96% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=249)
605 MBit/s ∼87% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
716 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Aorus 15 W9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=249)
558 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
547 (min: 364, max: 590) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
405
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Samsung SDCA029
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 427 cd/m² Médio: 401.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 404 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.15 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.89
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160
Medion Erazer X15805
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080
Aorus 15 W9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-344%
3022%
-233%
2980%
-483%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.2 (1.6, 1.6)
14 (7, 7)
-338%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-375%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-125%
13.6 (8, 5.6)
-325%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-425%
Response Time Black / White *
2 (1, 1)
9 (6, 3)
-350%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-460%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
-340%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-500%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-540%
PWM Frequency
235.8 (78)
23580 (24)
9900%
23260 (19)
9764%
Screen
-4%
5%
12%
20%
-2%
Brightness middle
404
343
-15%
266
-34%
286
-29%
282.3
-30%
295
-27%
Brightness
402
290
-28%
248
-38%
275
-32%
269
-33%
292
-27%
Brightness Distribution
89
74
-17%
89
0%
90
1%
90
1%
80
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.31
0.37
0.32
0.34
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.15
4.22
31%
2.78
55%
2.19
64%
1.17
81%
3.89
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.26
7.83
15%
5.96
36%
4.4
52%
3.29
64%
7.28
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.87
5.1
-5%
3.58
26%
2.2
55%
1.3
73%
4.98
-2%
Gamma
2.89 76%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.45 90%
CCT
6854 95%
6970 93%
7186 90%
6405 101%
6643 98%
6407 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68
58
-15%
62
-9%
59
-13%
63.8
-6%
60
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
92
2%
96
7%
91
1%
97.5
8%
93
3%
Contrast
927
858
773
882
868
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.33
0.91
2.27
1.06
1.44
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-174% / -72%
1514% / 828%
-111% / -37%
1500% / 827%
-243% / -98%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz ≤ 78 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 78 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1164 (1153.67-1261.15)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1197 (1182.87-1216.55)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Aorus 15 W9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1017 (1003.76-1122.08)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points ∼100% +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points ∼88%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼86% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼86% -2%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=496)
155 Points ∼76% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1253 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1126 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=499)
814 Points ∼65% -35%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
178 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1253 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
113.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6044 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5839 Points ∼97% +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points ∼95% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼94% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼94% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
5439 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=192)
5190 Points ∼86% -5%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +34%
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5899 Points ∼98% +31%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points ∼95% +27%
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5713 Points ∼95% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=376)
5023 Points ∼83% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
4520 Points ∼75%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5077 Points ∼100% +40%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼96% +33%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points ∼88% +22%
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4439 Points ∼87% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (3638 - 6093, n=394)
4247 Points ∼84% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
3638 Points ∼72%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3638 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4520 pontos
Ajuda
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
Medion Erazer X15805
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Aorus 15 W9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
-4%
-6%
-6%
-14%
Write 4K
126.7
116.8
-8%
115.5
-9%
97.04
-23%
91.32
-28%
99.18
-22%
Read 4K
66.11
41.42
-37%
57.97
-12%
49.58
-25%
40.73
-38%
54.06
-18%
Write Seq
1538
1994
30%
1555
1%
1838
20%
1915
25%
1524
-1%
Read Seq
2269
2392
5%
2590
14%
2421
7%
2051
-10%
2325
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
456.7
394.9
-14%
369.3
-19%
326.9
-28%
308.3
-32%
259.2
-43%
Read 4K Q32T1
554.1
438.2
-21%
441.7
-20%
372.9
-33%
417.4
-25%
328.9
-41%
Write Seq Q32T1
1541
1987
29%
1547
0%
1894
23%
1922
25%
1566
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
2567
3457
35%
2969
16%
2828
10%
3395
32%
2767
8%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
Sequential Read: 2050 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1474 MB/s
512K Read: 1303 MB/s
512K Write: 1212 MB/s
4K Read: 53.71 MB/s
4K Write: 99.47 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 386.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 326.2 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
7277 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
7266 Points ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
6716 Points ∼92% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
6526 Points ∼90%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
6499 Points ∼89% 0%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
6007 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5699 - 13013, n=138)
5577 Points ∼77% -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18962 Points ∼99% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18117 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼91% -4%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
16923 Points ∼88% -7%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
15501 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=522)
11187 Points ∼59% -38%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
24926 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼97% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
23133 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼88% -5%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
21660 Points ∼87% -6%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20464 Points ∼82% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=596)
13146 Points ∼53% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
19110 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29711 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16110 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6512 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +11%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
66.9 fps ∼95% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% +1%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.6 fps ∼91% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.5 fps ∼90%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
58 fps ∼83% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=291)
49 fps ∼70% -23%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
156.9 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
152 fps ∼97%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
150.7 fps ∼96% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
150.3 fps ∼96% -1%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
135.9 fps ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=330)
96.5 fps ∼62% -37%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
103 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.3 - 142, n=185)
58.7 fps ∼57% -43%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
43.4 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 87.4, n=43)
39.7 fps ∼91% -9%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L: Ø63.6 (57-70)
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 152fps
Thief (2014) 103fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 63.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 43.4fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 36.421.6fps

Barulho

Ocioso
34 / 35 / 45 dB
Carga
43 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
 46 °C49 °C49 °C 
 41 °C47 °C45 °C 
 37 °C41 °C39 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C
56 °C59 °C51 °C
57 °C57 °C45 °C
40 °C40 °C39 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 49.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 42.1 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203641.32539.343.63128.434.54031.238.45027.632.36326.3308025.731.210027.530.312524.728.916024.842.720022.551.525020.260.931520.362.440019.668.850019.167.663017.972.58001877.5100018.374.712502175.8160018.173.9200017.671.4250018.269.5315017.871.6400017.665.8500017.863.6630017.565.9800017.663.51000017.5611250017.465.31600017.561.6SPL30.583.7N1.457.3median 18.1median 65.8Delta1.46.543.345.539.640.632.434.934.435.527.228.829.332.327.732.226.832.523.434.222.74922.958.323.562.119.962.219.762.419.260.217.967.51871.917.87118.975.217.871.617.470.117.768.517.770.917.869.317.562.417.564.617.467.717.366.717.367.617.362.630.281.91.453.1median 17.8median 66.71.54.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XAGigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 23 / 25 / 33 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 197 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Medion Erazer X15805
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Aorus 15 W9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
14%
4%
-10%
9%
16%
6%
Idle Minimum *
23
15.1
34%
21
9%
24
-4%
18.3
20%
18
22%
19.5 (3.5 - 113, n=679)
15%
Idle Average *
25
19.2
23%
23
8%
27
-8%
22
12%
20
20%
25 (6.8 - 119, n=679)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
22.9
31%
32
3%
33
-0%
28.8
13%
28
15%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=679)
8%
Load Average *
96
107
-11%
97
-1%
129
-34%
93
3%
87
9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=670)
-8%
Load Maximum *
197
213
-8%
213
-8%
216
-10%
215.9
-10%
175
11%
170 (21.9 - 590, n=669)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
168
148
12%
176
-5%
142.6
15%
135
20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 29min
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Medion Erazer X15805
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 46.74 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Aorus 15 W9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-46%
12%
-45%
6%
-58%
-38%
Reader / Idle
591
545
-8%
353
-40%
176
-70%
342 (39 - 1174, n=650)
-42%
WiFi v1.3
342
185
-46%
421
23%
220
-36%
362
6%
141
-59%
255 (78 - 622, n=342)
-25%
Load
149
181
21%
62
-58%
81
-46%
79 (18 - 202, n=616)
-47%

Pro

+ Painel OLED com excelente contraste e valor de preto
+ Muitas opções de conexão
+ WLAN com padrão 802.11 ax (WiFi 6)
+ Marcos finos

Contra

- Carcaça suscetível à poeira e digitais
- Bastante barulhento sob carga
- Tela refletiva

Veredicto - A Gigabyte melhora o Aero 15 discretamente, mas também herda algumas fraquezas antigas

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

Em nosso teste, o Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA mostra-se com um desempenho sólido no meio do campo de dispositivos comparáveis. Embora o desempenho do sistema nos benchmarks sintéticos permaneça um pouco abaixo do desempenho dos concorrentes, os desempenhos do processador, gráficos e armazenamento não dão motivos para reclamações. Além disso, há bom equipamento de conexão e um adaptador WLAN com WiFi 6 ou o padrão 802.11 ax preparado para o futuro. O design retrabalhado é orientado sobre os pontos fortes dos modelos predecessores, mas ainda é igual  de suscetível à sujeira e às digitais.

A Gigabyte melhorou discretamente o Aero 15 e continua a oferecer um portátil digno de recomendação com design fino e bom desempenho.

O destaque é claro que é o painel OLED 4K. As vantagens no contraste e valor de preto não podem ser negadas. Mas aqui as fraquezas também se mostram, como a PWM, que é particularmente chata para usuários com olhos sensíveis. Além disso, devido à superfície refletiva da tela, o uso do dispositivo se torna difícil em exteriores. Finalmente, devemos mencionar o bom sistema de resfriamento e também a boa duração da bateria, fazendo com que o Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA mereça a atenção de quem procura um portátil fino e potente.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA - 07/30/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
72 / 81 → 89%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
77 / 95 → 81%
Ruído
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
74%
Médio
80%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15 XA: Com painel OLED e 4K em um novo design
Mike Wobker, 2019-07-31 (Update: 2019-08- 1)