Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Well endowed. O bem equipado Aero 15-Y9 permite que (quase) todos os jogos sejam rodados fluentemente em sua tela 4K mate. No entanto, a Gigabyte escolheu equipar o portátil apenas com a variante Max-Q da GeForce 2080. Como resultado, não é capaz de oferecer muito mais desempenho de jogos acima dos modelos Aero-15 com GPUs RTX 2070 Max-Q.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Aero 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus
Memória
64 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, dois bancos (ambos em uso)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB), IPS, 60 Hz, 4K/UHD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8, 2048 GB 
, 2x M.2-2280 (um slot em uso)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356 x 250
Bateria
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 15.2 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo (2x 2W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, XSplit Gamecaster, XSplit Broadcaster, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.118 kg, Suprimento de energia: 718 g
Preço
4999 Euro
Links
Gigabyte página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s -50%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s -50%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +72%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
662 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +105%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
673 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s -2%
333
cd/m²		346
cd/m²		343
cd/m²
332
cd/m²		350
cd/m²		324
cd/m²
333
cd/m²		351
cd/m²		322
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 351 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 337.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 350 cd/m²
Contraste: 1207:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.62
ΔE Greyscale 1.21 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB), IPS, 3840x2160		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-23%
-22%
-22%
-22%
-21%
Display P3 Coverage
86.8
63.5
-27%
66.2
-24%
66.7
-23%
64.2
-26%
65.3
-25%
sRGB Coverage
100
93.1
-7%
92.1
-8%
91.2
-9%
92.6
-7%
94.9
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.7
64.5
-35%
67.2
-33%
66.7
-33%
65.7
-34%
66.3
-34%
Response Times
63%
64%
77%
74%
66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60 ?(29.2, 30.8)
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
73%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
71%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
88%
8 ?(4, 4)
87%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
72%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8 ?(13.2, 15.6)
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
53%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
56%
10 ?(4.4, 5.6)
65%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
61%
11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4)
60%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-27%
-62%
-75%
-143%
-81%
Brightness middle
350
250
-29%
254
-27%
294
-16%
304
-13%
314.7
-10%
Brightness
337
235
-30%
262
-22%
275
-18%
299
-11%
312
-7%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
89
-3%
84
-9%
89
-3%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.29
0.29
-0%
0.22
24%
0.24
17%
0.27
7%
0.38
-31%
Contrast
1207
862
-29%
1155
-4%
1225
1%
1126
-7%
828
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.93
1.46
-57%
2.37
-155%
2.57
-176%
4.66
-401%
2.56
-175%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.43
2.47
-73%
4.71
-229%
4.88
-241%
9.65
-575%
4.89
-242%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.62
1.84
-197%
2.14
-245%
1.72
-177%
1.71
-176%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.21
1.27
-5%
1.58
-31%
2.41
-99%
5.53
-357%
3.4
-181%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.4 92%
2.48 89%
2.5 88%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
CCT
6672 97%
6749 96%
6785 96%
6370 102%
8028 81%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
60
-32%
60
-32%
59
-33%
60
-32%
60.7
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
93
-7%
92
-8%
91
-9%
93
-7%
94.6
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / -14%
-7% / -39%
-7% / -46%
-30% / -93%
-12% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
LatencyMon
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
Intel XTU
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1157 (1138.53-1236.86)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
CPU clock speed during the Cinebench 15 run
CPU clock speed during the Cinebench 15 run
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7089
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37099
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6820
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
193 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1237 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
193 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points +150%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1237 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points -19%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=24, last 2 years)
9030 Points +27%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7089 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=24, last 2 years)
58921 Points +59%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
37099 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points -9%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points +80%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
387 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points +212%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2379 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
23881 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points -11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
4511 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points -17%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=26, last 2 years)
48889 Points +97%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
24847 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points -25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5986 - 8936, n=26, last 2 years)
7580 Points +33%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
5682 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1126 ms * -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)
1014 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=208, last 2 years)
520 ms * +49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 111243, n=52, last 2 years)
92245 Points +144%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)
37865 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 650, n=27, last 2 years)
493 Points +79%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)
274.9 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.9 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.4 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6905 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3944 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5164 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4775 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5743 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8
5743 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points -10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points -11%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +32%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points +18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4620 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8
3944 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +27%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5706 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points +18%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8
4775 Points
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8
Sequential Read: 2369 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1450 MB/s
512K Read: 1386 MB/s
512K Write: 1439 MB/s
4K Read: 62.5 MB/s
4K Write: 136.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 590 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 464.6 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-8%
-6%
-20%
14%
-6%
Write 4K
109.4
97.1
-11%
95.3
-13%
98.2
-10%
93.6
-14%
93.9
-14%
Read 4K
56.6
53.7
-5%
40.13
-29%
39.43
-30%
38.82
-31%
40.56
-28%
Write Seq
1508
1526
1%
1883
25%
1386
-8%
2455
63%
1468
-3%
Read Seq
2427
2020
-17%
1322
-46%
1100
-55%
2107
-13%
1540
-37%
Write 4K Q32T1
307
285.6
-7%
309.9
1%
270.3
-12%
298.7
-3%
293.5
-4%
Read 4K Q32T1
351.3
321.8
-8%
353.7
1%
340.3
-3%
338.7
-4%
346
-2%
Write Seq Q32T1
1523
1533
1%
1919
26%
1454
-5%
2902
91%
1941
27%
Read Seq Q32T1
2825
2351
-17%
2466
-13%
1681
-40%
3536
25%
3266
16%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
38435 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
19220 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
66387 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29945 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16020 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6399 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)
29442 Points +63%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18048 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points -2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)
12060 Points +87%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
6464 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)
40451 Points +73%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points +20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
23386 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points -6%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points -20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18296 Points -22%
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 280.1 197.5 187.8 137.6
GTA V (2015) 140 135.3 115.4 62.6 74
The Witcher 3 (2015) 255 192.7 117.3 65.7 39.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 91 80.5 67.2 51.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 114 94 88 84 34
Darksiders III (2018) 137 103.5 94.3 84.8 29.8
Apex Legends (2019) 143.7 137.1 111.8 109.9 36
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 101 88 82 74 36
Metro Exodus (2019) 116.7 77.7 58.2 47.8 20.9
Anthem (2019) 84.5 73.7 72.1 67.4 26.4
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 157.8 116.1 101.1 66.3 31.2
The Division 2 (2019) 132 97 84 69 26
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | GTA V | X-Plane 11.11
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.8 fps +78%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
68.9 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
65.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -11%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.7 fps -20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
49.2 fps -25%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
152.5 fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps -7%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
107.1 fps +71%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
62.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
54.2 fps -13%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.7 fps +51%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
67.2 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
61.6 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
137.6
127.7
-7%
118.9 ?(Single-Channel)
-14%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
67.2
61.6
-8%
55.8 ?(Single-Channel)
-17%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
84
67
-20%
66 ?(Single-Channel)
-21%
Darksiders III
1920x1080 Epic
84.8
64.9
-23%
81.4 ?(Single-Channel)
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-15% / -15%
-14% / -14%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8: Ø59.9 (47-67)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø50.3 (45-54)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)
GPU clock during The Witcher 3 tests
GPU clock during The Witcher 3 tests

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 33 / 36 dB
Carga
44 / 45 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
3%
-9%
0%
8%
8%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29
-0%
28.8
1%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
31
32
-3%
30
3%
33
-6%
30
3%
28.8
7%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
33
34
-3%
31
6%
34
-3%
32
3%
28.8
13%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
36
36
-0%
34
6%
40
-11%
34
6%
29.4
18%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years)
15%
Load Average *
44
42
5%
43
2%
47
-7%
44
-0%
35.7
19%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years)
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
44
-2%
42
2%
51
-19%
46
-7%
42.5
1%
Load Maximum *
45
48
-7%
44
2%
53
-18%
47
-4%
45
-0%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 64 °C63 °C64 °C 
 44 °C48 °C42 °C 
 38 °C40 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 64 °C
Médio: 49 °C
67 °C69 °C58 °C
61 °C61 °C48 °C
43 °C44 °C42 °C
Máximo: 69 °C
Médio: 54.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 69 °C / 156 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
8%
16%
6%
3%
18%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
64
56
12%
49
23%
54
16%
49
23%
49
23%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years)
28%
Maximum Bottom *
69
66
4%
63
9%
60
13%
58
16%
49
29%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years)
28%
Idle Upper Side *
29
27
7%
24
17%
30
-3%
33
-14%
25.4
12%
31.3 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years)
-8%
Idle Bottom *
29
27
7%
25
14%
30
-3%
33
-14%
27.2
6%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.143.32537.936.93128.329.44031.832.75026.726.86327.426.38026.22710025.627.212523.534.81602250.320022.759.325022.463.831520.164.840018.863.650017.864.163017.470.680017.272.510001869.6125018.172.5160017.769.8200017.169.9250017.767.2315017.572.4400017.870.1500017.761630017.461.3800017.362.51000017.462.61250017.561.61600017.263.2SPL29.981.2N1.351.5median 17.7median 63.8Delta1.66.642.542.740.138.230.133.434.142.137.532.62732.3313231.339.224.845.223.450.722.555.22461.320.967.619.165.318.161.917.767.217.371.616.969.418.9701869.616.771.317.27017.170.6176717.363.417.165.517.167.217.164.217.157.616.852.929.980.71.451.1median 17.3median 65.526.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15-Y9Acer Predator Triton 500
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17 / 21 / 27 Watt
Carga midlight 111 / 183 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
12%
24%
-6%
-1%
18%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
17
16
6%
7
59%
17
-0%
16
6%
10.4
39%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Average *
21
18
14%
11
48%
20
5%
22
-5%
14.6
30%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Maximum *
27
23
15%
20
26%
29
-7%
32
-19%
16.3
40%
26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Average *
111
88
21%
98
12%
112
-1%
89
20%
88.5
20%
111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years)
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
130
120
8%
132
-2%
152
-17%
147
-13%
155.4
-20%
Load Maximum *
183
167
9%
182
1%
211
-15%
173
5%
182.4
-0%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years)
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 21min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
5h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 27min
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
9%
-12%
-63%
-44%
-3%
-6%
Reader / Idle
561
549
-2%
507
-10%
213
-62%
335
-40%
682
22%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
-3%
H.264
332
364
10%
356
7%
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)
20%
WiFi v1.3
354
382
8%
362
2%
157
-56%
190
-46%
387
9%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years)
4%
Load
147
174
18%
81
-45%
42
-71%
81
-45%
88
-40%
84.4 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years)
-43%

Pro

+ Tela 4K mate
+ X-Rite Pantone
+ Boa reprodução de cores
+ Compacto, construção leve
+ Materiais de alta qualidade
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Design elegante
+ Ferramentas práticas
+ SSD NVMe
+ Slot M.2-2280
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Variante lenta do RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Altas temperaturas
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Durações da bateria piores que as do seu antecessor
- Extremamente caro
The Gigabyte 15-Y9-9DE4720P, provided for review by Gigabyte Deutschland.
The Gigabyte 15-Y9-9DE4720P, provided for review by Gigabyte Deutschland.

A unidade na nossa frente hoje, o Aero 15-Y9, representa o modelo carro chefe da gama Aero-15 e, como esperado, o fabricante teve como objetivo impressionar: A Gigabyte usou o melhor para esta configuração. A combinação de uma CPU Core i9-8950HK e GPU GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q permite uma experiência de jogo fluente com resolução FHD e com configurações de detalhes médios a máximos em sua tela 4K mate.

No entanto, o portátil é equipado apenas com uma variante Max-Q (80 W) da RTX 2080.

Como resultado, o Aero 15-Y9 não é realmente capaz de se distanciar do Aero 15-X9 equipado com RTX 2070 Max-Q. Ao executar no mesmo modo de RAM (canal único/canal duplo), os dois dispositivos frequentemente ofereciam taxas de quadros semelhantes. Como resultado, a maioria dos potenciais compradores estaria melhor servida pela versão mais barata do RTX 2070 Max-Q do Aero.

O SSD NVMe incluído oferece não apenas excelentes taxas de transferência, mas também muito espaço de armazenamento (2 TB). Internamente, o portátil também possui um slot adicional para um segundo SSD M.2 2280. Nenhum slot está disponível para uma unidade de 2,5 polegadas no Aero 15.

A tela IPS 4K mate impressionou com bons ângulos de visão, bom brilho e contraste e impressionante reprodução de cores. No entanto, os tempos de reação ficam claramente atrás do Aero 15-X9 equipado com um painel de 144 Hz. A duração da bateria também está um pouco atrás do Aero 15-X9. Isso não é surpresa e é esperado da tela 4K. No entanto, em geral, o desempenho da bateria foi muito bom para um portátil de jogos.

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 - 05/14/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Bateria
66 / 95 → 69%
Pantalha
93%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
89%
Temperatura
65 / 95 → 69%
Ruído
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
74%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
74%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-03-25 (Update: 2019-03-26)