Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus GX501VS (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/26/2017

Agora $500 mais barato. A Asus está apostando no Max-Q com seu segundo portátil Zephyrus equipado com gráficos GTX 1070 Max-Q. O preço de venda é um pouco mais acessível desta vez, mas as reduções no hardware são difíceis de ignorar apesar do forte desempenho gráfico.

Asus Zephyrus GX501VS (Zephyrus GX501 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.22
Memória
16384 MB 
, 8 GB soldered + 8 GB DDR4-2400 PC4-19200 SODIMM
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.9 x 379 x 262
Bateria
50 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 W stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Quick Start guide, Warranty card, Palm rest, ROG stickers, Sonic Suite 2, ROG Gaming Center, Asus Live Update, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.25 kg, Suprimento de energia: 670 g
Preço
2300 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
677 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
657 MBit/s ∼97% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
652 MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
456 MBit/s ∼100%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
361 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
343 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
315.2
cd/m²
320.3
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
326.3
cd/m²
307.1
cd/m²
312.1
cd/m²
320.8
cd/m²
281.6
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 326.3 cd/m² Médio: 308.6 cd/m² Minimum: 34.58 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 877:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | - Ø
85% sRGB (Argyll) 55.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P56XT
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v6
IPS, 15.6, 2880x1620
EVGA SC15
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, , 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-4%
-1%
-8%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.2 (18.4, 14.8)
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
-22%
37.2 (18.4, 18.8)
-12%
34 (19, 25)
-2%
41.6 (21.6, 20)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (15.6, 12.4)
24 (11.6, 12.4)
14%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
11%
32 (8, 24)
-14%
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
-10%
PWM Frequency
20000 (95)
198.4
Screen
-42%
-51%
-33%
-21%
Brightness
309
305
-1%
280
-9%
271
-12%
253
-18%
Brightness Distribution
86
83
-3%
87
1%
83
-3%
73
-15%
Black Level *
0.35
0.25
29%
0.32
9%
0.249
29%
0.27
23%
Contrast
877
1312
50%
941
7%
1126
28%
1043
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
6.02
-77%
6.21
-83%
4.94
-45%
3.9
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
6.32
-351%
6.08
-334%
5.13
-266%
3.8
-171%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.28 105%
2.31 104%
2.26 106%
2.27 106%
CCT
6558 99%
8194 79%
7375 88%
7433 87%
7322 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.6
60
8%
55
-1%
55.9
1%
57.8
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85
92
8%
84
-1%
85.9
1%
89.3
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-23% / -35%
-26% / -41%
-21% / -28%
-20% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼97% +27%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼82% +7%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼82% +7%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼80% +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
150 Points ∼77%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼73% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼69% -11%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼67% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +22%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼41% +19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼36% +5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼34% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼34%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼32% -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼32% -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points ∼26% -23%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼99% +21%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼83% +2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼82% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼82%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼78% -5%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼75% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼68% -17%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼67% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼41% +21%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼36% +6%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼35% +5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼34% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points ∼34%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼32% -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼31% -7%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points ∼25% -25%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +23%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points ∼73% +10%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points ∼70% +5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6015 Points ∼68% +3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5860 Points ∼66%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼61% -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼58% -13%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +27%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points ∼48% +7%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points ∼46% +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22470 Points ∼45% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22243 Points ∼45%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼40% -10%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -16%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.193 s * ∼3% -1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.05 s * ∼2%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% -0%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +16%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
539.478 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
535.159 Seconds * ∼2% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11337
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22243
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5860
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
68.09 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
150 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.67 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
734 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5400 Points ∼83% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5358 Points ∼82%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5289 Points ∼81% -1%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼78% -6%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7973 Points ∼86% +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
7653 Points ∼82%
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7505 Points ∼81% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5085 Points ∼85% +2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5057 Points ∼85% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5009 Points ∼84%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼81% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5009 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7653 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5358 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Eurocom Tornado F5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
EVGA SC15
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
AS SSD
-63%
22%
-76%
-20%
Copy Game MB/s
718.5
377.83
-47%
1310.15
82%
1072.6
49%
977.48
36%
Copy Program MB/s
383.33
198.98
-48%
634.94
66%
351.48
-8%
442.3
15%
Copy ISO MB/s
1794.95
354.73
-80%
1614.11
-10%
351.13
-80%
1070.79
-40%
Score Total
3995
1019
-74%
3943
-1%
1630
-59%
2474
-38%
Score Write
1293
304
-76%
1689
31%
514
-60%
896
-31%
Score Read
1818
472
-74%
1512
-17%
756
-58%
1081
-41%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.037
-16%
0.024
25%
0.025
22%
0.035
-9%
Access Time Read *
0.047
0.1
-113%
0.03
36%
0.367
-681%
0.054
-15%
4K-64 Write
1034.83
171.63
-83%
1333.91
29%
272.53
-74%
705.92
-32%
4K-64 Read
1526.85
383.39
-75%
1178.67
-23%
521.36
-66%
821.51
-46%
4K Write
117.29
104.01
-11%
150.46
28%
131.32
12%
95.46
-19%
4K Read
50.15
37.2
-26%
50.96
2%
44.6
-11%
39.13
-22%
Seq Write
1409.1
288.18
-80%
2046.28
45%
1098.57
-22%
942.8
-33%
Seq Read
2412.19
510.07
-79%
2819.05
17%
1904.01
-21%
2203.33
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Sequential Read: 2412.19 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1409.1 MB/s
4K Read: 50.15 MB/s
4K Write: 117.29 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1526.85 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1034.83 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.047 ms
Access Time Write: 0.032 ms
Copy ISO: 1794.95 MB/s
Copy Program: 383.33 MB/s
Copy Game: 718.5 MB/s
Score Read: 1818 Points
Score Write: 1293 Points
Score Total: 3995 Points
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
6722 Points ∼66% +84%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7600K
4851 Points ∼48% +32%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
4175 Points ∼41% +14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4048 Points ∼40% +11%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
3662 Points ∼36%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points ∼29% -21%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2571 Points ∼25% -30%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points ∼23% -37%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
1810 Points ∼18% -51%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7600K
9927 Points ∼60% +32%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
8281 Points ∼50% +10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
7527 Points ∼46%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5441 Points ∼33% -28%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points ∼28% -39%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
3740 Points ∼23% -50%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
28366 Points ∼70% +75%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7600K
20532 Points ∼51% +27%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% +13%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
17433 Points ∼43% +8%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
16165 Points ∼40%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% -20%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11453 Points ∼28% -29%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
10349 Points ∼25% -36%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% -41%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7866 Points ∼19% -51%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
11584 Points ∼72% +28%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼70% +23%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
10303 Points ∼64% +14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9065 Points ∼57%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼56% -1%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8876 Points ∼56% -2%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8762 Points ∼55% -3%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7600K
8513 Points ∼53% -6%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼52% -8%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7163 Points ∼45% -21%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
38959 Points ∼76% +92%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7600K
26874 Points ∼53% +33%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% +16%
Aorus X7 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
22190 Points ∼44% +10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
20240 Points ∼40%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% -14%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15453 Points ∼30% -24%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
13279 Points ∼26% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -38%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
9394 Points ∼18% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
15479 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
140612 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27890 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13136 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6993 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
75.9 fps ∼100% +49%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
68.1 (min: 56) fps ∼90% +34%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
61.3 fps ∼81% +20%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
51 fps ∼67%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
41 fps ∼54% -20%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
34.6 fps ∼46% -32%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
26 fps ∼34% -49%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
22 fps ∼29% -57%
baixo média alto ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 70fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 131.6fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 108.4fps
Thief (2014) 98.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 9651fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 11179fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 95.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 85.9fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 74.272.8fps
Overwatch (2016) 81.3fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 56fps
Prey (2017) 140.8fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 82.7fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Barulho

Ocioso
28.5 / 28.5 / 30.1 dB
Carga
35.2 / 48.8 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Noise
-8%
-15%
-13%
-5%
-9%
off / environment *
28.5
31
-9%
30
-5%
30
-5%
28
2%
28.8
-1%
Idle Minimum *
28.5
32
-12%
34
-19%
34
-19%
31.9
-12%
33.1
-16%
Idle Average *
28.5
33
-16%
35
-23%
35
-23%
32
-12%
33.1
-16%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
34
-13%
39
-30%
36
-20%
32
-6%
34
-13%
Load Average *
35.2
39
-11%
39
-11%
40
-14%
36.5
-4%
37.2
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.7
42
-1%
48
-15%
40.3
3%
46.1
-11%
Load Maximum *
48.8
46
6%
49
-0%
46
6%
53.4
-9%
47.1
3%

* ... smaller is better

 49 °C54.4 °C46.2 °C 
 43 °C51 °C42 °C 
 36.2 °C39 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 54.4 °C
Médio: 44 °C
41.2 °C39 °C39.8 °C
38 °C40.6 °C39.2 °C
36.4 °C39.6 °C38.4 °C
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.72536.134.73136.134.44034.235.25033.4336333.233.58031.831.810031.631.712529.832.216029.537.12002846.125028.251.131527.456.240026.459.150025.961.263025.86280024.965100024.960.8125024.859.9160024.762.7200024.261.1250024.162.8315024.263.9400023.968.650002470.663002471.480002470.7100002465.61250023.966.71600024.258.8SPL36.878.6N2.842.1median 24.8Asus Zephyrus GX501VSmedian 61.2Delta1.96.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.38 / 0.63 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 19.1 / 20.8 / 21.8 Watt
Carga midlight 73.7 / 173.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-1%
-13%
-14%
-88%
Idle Minimum *
19.1
13
32%
25.8
-35%
18
6%
34
-78%
Idle Average *
20.8
17
18%
26.6
-28%
23
-11%
41
-97%
Idle Maximum *
21.8
22
-1%
26.7
-22%
31
-42%
50
-129%
Load Average *
73.7
85
-15%
80.3
-9%
79
-7%
106
-44%
Load Maximum *
173.1
208
-20%
159.3
8%
196
-13%
320
-85%
Witcher 3 ultra *
130.2
154
-18%
121.2
7%
148
-14%
257
-97%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 49min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
2h 27min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 49min
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 91.2 Wh
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
77%
151%
46%
25%
-13%
Reader / Idle
229
377
65%
568
148%
249
9%
222
-3%
188
-18%
WiFi v1.3
147
246
67%
384
161%
182
24%
167
14%
130
-12%
Load
49
98
100%
120
145%
100
104%
81
65%
44
-10%

Pro

+ Ruído da ventoinha mais silencioso do que outros portáteis de jogos superfinos
+ Temperaturas da GPU relativamente baixas sob uso intenso
+ Desempenho muito alto considerando o tamanho
+ Excelente sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost da CPU
+ Design atraente do chassi
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Sem leitor SD, porta RJ-45, HD secundário, ou opções Optimus
- O design exclusivo sacrifica o conforto se não estiver trabalhando em uma mesa plana
- Teclas esponjosas; sem teclas NumPad ou Macro dedicadas
- Tempos de resposta médios da tela para um portátil de jogos
- CPU muito quente sob uso intenso
- As ventoinhas do sistema são sensíveis às cargas na tela
- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla; sem ESS Sabre DAC
- Baixa capacidade da bateria; curta duração da bateria
- Sem opções de tela UHD 4K ou outras
- Acessibilidade difícil
In review: Asus Zephyrus GX501VS-XS71. Test model provided by Xotic PC
In review: Asus Zephyrus GX501VS-XS71. Test model provided by Xotic PC

O GX501VS é vendido atualmente $500 mais barato do que o GX501VI de $2800. Os gamers que possam lidar com a queda de 15 por cento de desempenho do GTX 1080 Max-Q para o GTX 1070 Max-Q encontrarão uma barreira inferior mais atraente para entrar nesta última configuração Zephyrus. Isto é verdade especialmente se os jogos em 120 FPS ou 4K não são atraentes, pois o GTX 1070 Max-Q é atualmente mais do que suficiente para 1080p60 na maioria dos títulos testados. Quando comparado com os concorrentes não Max-Q mais próximos, o GX501 é impressionantemente mais rápido e mais silencioso.

Além das discrepâncias de desempenho entre as duas SKUs Max-Q, nossas análises no GX501VI ainda se aplicam ao GX501VS. O ruído da ventoinha é quase o mesmo, apesar do mais lento GTX 1070 Max-Q que funciona a 10 C a menos quando sob cargas de jogos. O desempenho da CPU é estável ao custo de altas temperaturas do núcleo e o teclado ainda é bastante inferior para fins de jogo. 

A característica de dobradiça única continua a ser uma bolsa mista. Ele permite um chassi muito plano e atraente, mas este definitivamente não é um portátil para usar no colo ou no trem sem uma mesa plana. Mesmo assim, o posicionamento do teclado fechado é desfavorável em espaços apertados como em aviões. Essas desvantagens estão em desacordo com o design fino e portátil.

O GX501VS mais acessível da Asus possui uma enorme quantidade de poder e funciona de forma mais silenciosa do que outros portáteis superfinos atualmente no mercado. Os usuários que querem o Zephyrus pelo seu tamanho, ruído da ventoinha decente e potencial de gráficos de 1080p, encontrarão muito do que gostar. Caso contrário, portáteis de jogos maiores e mais tradicionais de 15 polegadas com gráficos GTX 1070 padrão, ainda darão mais pelo seu dinheiro.

Asus Zephyrus GX501VS - 08/25/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
59 / 81 → 73%
Peso
61 / 66 → 92%
Bateria
66%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
87 / 90 → 97%
Audio
70%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Médio
75%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus GX501VS (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)
Allen Ngo, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 2)