Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro 2017 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, FHD)

A borda do Razor. O último Blade Pro perdeu muito do que fez o Blade Pro do ano passado tão único. Talvez, surpreendentemente, as mudanças e reduções tenham contribuído para uma máquina de jogos ainda melhor e mais equilibrada, de muitas maneiras.
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 (Blade Pro Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1404 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 385.69, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4 2400 MHz, Dual-Channel, 17-17-17-39, 2x SODIMM
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, Secundário: 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.5 x 424 x 281
Bateria
70 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP (FHD)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo (Dolby Digital Plus Home Theater), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
3.13 kg, Suprimento de energia: 544 g
Preço
2300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

424 mm 332 mm 29.9 mm 4.4 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.4 kg427 mm 277 mm 22.4 mm 3.1 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.1 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg411.8 mm 284.9 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS73VR 7RG
 
182.9 MB/s +164%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
 
69.2 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 7RF
 
25.9 MB/s -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GS73VR 7RG
 
212.2 MB/s +155%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
 
83.2 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 7RF
 
27.1 MB/s -67%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s -5%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
486 MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s +65%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
605 MBit/s +43%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
424 MBit/s
370.2
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
389.1
cd/m²
334.6
cd/m²
367.4
cd/m²
338.4
cd/m²
358.3
cd/m²
374.8
cd/m²
345.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 389.1 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 362.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 367.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.30, 3840x2160
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
AU Optronics ID: AUO219D, Name: B173HW02 V1, TN LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 7RG
ID: CMN1747, Name: Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, TN LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
Aorus X7 v7
AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), TN LED, 17.30, 2560x1440
Display
35%
4%
28%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
64
88.9
39%
69.7
9%
89.6
40%
63
-2%
sRGB Coverage
89.7
100
11%
90.4
1%
100
11%
87.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.9
99.7
54%
66.8
3%
86.9
34%
63.7
-2%
Response Times
-34%
57%
60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.8 ?(19.6, 17.2)
60.8 ?(28.8, 32)
-65%
23.6 ?(13.6, 10)
36%
24 ?(14, 10)
35%
Response Time Black / White *
37.2 ?(21.6, 15.6)
38.4 ?(22, 16.4)
-3%
8.4 ?(6, 2.4)
77%
6 ?(4, 2)
84%
PWM Frequency
204.9 ?(20)
26040 ?(10)
Screen
-6%
-84%
-35%
-25%
Brightness middle
367.4
230
-37%
315.5
-14%
350.9
-4%
375
2%
Brightness
363
207
-43%
295
-19%
311
-14%
353
-3%
Brightness Distribution
86
83
-3%
87
1%
79
-8%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.2
37%
0.822
-157%
0.33
-3%
0.58
-81%
Contrast
1148
1150
0%
384
-67%
1063
-7%
647
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
5.62
-48%
12.21
-221%
7.7
-103%
6.06
-59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.4
10.24
2%
14.4
-38%
10.54
-1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
4.54
-30%
13.4
-283%
11.1
-217%
5.68
-62%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.36 93%
2.39 92%
2.11 104%
2.3 96%
CCT
6467 101%
6625 98%
19530 33%
11813 55%
7998 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.1
88
51%
59
2%
77.74
34%
57
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.3
100
12%
90.3
1%
100
12%
87
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -2%
-40% / -62%
17% / -10%
11% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points +19%
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
167 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
154 Points -4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points -7%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
139 Points -13%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
941 (921.89min - 945.25max) Points +28%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
708 Points -3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points -4%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points -7%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
641 Points -13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
597 Points -19%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points +32%
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
1.9 Points +14%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points +11%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points +10%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points +1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
1.59 Points -4%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -10%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
10.99 Points +54%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points +37%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points +18%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points +15%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points +13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points +9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.14 Points
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points -3%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
6.51 Points -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
30921 Points +48%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
29209 Points +39%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points +35%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22316 Points +7%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
20943 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points -3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
18287 Points -13%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points +31%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7214 Points +31%
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
6371 Points +15%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6078 Points +10%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5521 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points -1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
5141 Points -7%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
262.2 s * -24%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.7 s * -6%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.1 s *
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
210.4 s * +1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.1 s * +1%
no name
Intel Core i5-8400
191.8 s * +10%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.3 s * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6765
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20943
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5521
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
63.4 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
104.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
733 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
5974 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5819 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3975 Points -32%
Productivity
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
6975 Points +8%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
6481 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
5259 Points -19%
Essentials
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
8255 Points +7%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
7724 Points
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
7622 Points -1%
Score
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4891 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4752 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points -16%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points +8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4394 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
5215 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5159 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points -52%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points +45%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
5491 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5364 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4207 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5364 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5159 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4752 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Aorus X7 v7
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
AS SSD
40%
-31%
-20%
75%
Copy Game MB/s
724
408.5
-44%
381.5
-47%
758
5%
Copy Program MB/s
228.3
201.9
-12%
229.8
1%
327.2
43%
Copy ISO MB/s
1193
336.3
-72%
423.5
-65%
1504
26%
Score Total
1951
2715
39%
923
-53%
1064
-45%
3668
88%
Score Write
406
676
67%
325
-20%
417
3%
1021
151%
Score Read
1056
1414
34%
396
-62%
421
-60%
1803
71%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.036
-6%
0.032
6%
0.032
6%
0.031
9%
Access Time Read *
0.06
0.051
15%
0.052
13%
0.051
15%
0.059
2%
4K-64 Write
267.2
513
92%
197.6
-26%
273.6
2%
791
196%
4K-64 Read
871
1116
28%
310.9
-64%
337.7
-61%
1485
70%
4K Write
109.9
104.4
-5%
101.8
-7%
96.8
-12%
123.3
12%
4K Read
38.31
37.57
-2%
33.98
-11%
33.69
-12%
48.35
26%
Seq Write
291.8
588
102%
254.6
-13%
465.1
59%
1067
266%
Seq Read
1464
2599
78%
510
-65%
497.9
-66%
2690
84%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 311.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 551 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 310.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1247 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 311.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.22 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.1 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
18879 Points +71%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
17106 Points +55%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
14663 Points +33%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points +18%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
11453 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
11049 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
10791 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
10349 Points -6%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points -13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ
4390 Points -60%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
3957 Points +57%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
3278 Points +30%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points +15%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2571 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2522 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
2488 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points -9%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
24868 Points +82%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
22427 Points +64%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18642 Points +36%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points +27%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
15453 Points +13%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
13668 Points
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
13534 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
13279 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points -9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ
5397 Points -61%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10129 Points +15%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
9550 Points +8%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9256 Points +5%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
8876 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
8830 Points
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
8762 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points -6%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
7940 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ
5560 Points -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
12113 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
127207 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25985 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9497 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5057 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 102.6
Metro: Last Light (2013) 73.5
Thief (2014) 72.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66.4 38.3
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 84 55
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60 60
Fallout 4 (2015) 66.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 71.6 58.7
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 58.6 52.6
Overwatch (2016) 105.2
Mafia 3 (2016) 42
Prey (2017) 102.3
Dirt 4 (2017) 98.5 55
F1 2017 (2017) 99 61
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Barulho

Ocioso
29.5 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB
Carga
31.6 / 51.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
MSI GF72VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Noise
-13%
-6%
-6%
-6%
-15%
off / environment *
28.1
30
-7%
28
-0%
28.1
-0%
30
-7%
Idle Minimum *
29.5
30
-2%
30.6
-4%
29.4
-0%
31.4
-6%
33
-12%
Idle Average *
29.6
31
-5%
30.7
-4%
30.7
-4%
31.4
-6%
36
-22%
Idle Maximum *
29.6
33
-11%
32.6
-10%
34
-15%
32.6
-10%
41
-39%
Load Average *
31.6
43
-36%
38.8
-23%
42
-33%
39.4
-25%
41
-30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
55
-20%
45.8
-0%
45.3
2%
45
2%
Load Maximum *
51.8
58
-12%
46.2
11%
45.8
12%
52
-0%
52
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 36.2 °C48.2 °C33.8 °C 
 33.6 °C38.8 °C35 °C 
 31 °C33.8 °C33.2 °C 
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 36 °C
33.6 °C43.2 °C36.2 °C
35.8 °C41.8 °C36.6 °C
33.2 °C37.6 °C32.6 °C
Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  69 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.340.82535.534.73134.634.44035.633.7503434.66333.636.48030.738.910030.443.112529.847.316028.35320027.855.22502760.23152662.840025.46150025.161.363025.166.980025.265.610002461.2125023.660160023.765.3200023.464.8250023.262.231502364400022.960.850002358630023.147.280002347.51000022.946.7125002342.2160002342.5SPL35.974.3N2.633.9median 23.7median 60.2Delta1.18.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Pro RZ09-0220Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.64 / 0.96 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10.6 / 16 / 16.4 Watt
Carga midlight 75.9 / 163.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade (2017)
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
MSI GS73VR 7RG
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI GF72VR 7RF
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
Power Consumption
-113%
18%
-11%
-96%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
10.6
31
-192%
7.5
29%
10.1
5%
27
-155%
15.7
-48%
Idle Average *
16
36
-125%
12.1
24%
18.3
-14%
33
-106%
21.4
-34%
Idle Maximum *
16.4
44
-168%
14.3
13%
19.6
-20%
40
-144%
21.9
-34%
Load Average *
75.9
107
-41%
73.5
3%
87.6
-15%
107
-41%
83.9
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
111.2
212
-91%
108
3%
136.3
-23%
190
-71%
130.2
-17%
Load Maximum *
163.8
258
-58%
110.2
33%
160.7
2%
259
-58%
159.6
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 12min
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 74 Wh
MSI GS73VR 7RG
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh
MSI GF72VR 7RF
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 43 Wh
Aorus X7 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
Battery Runtime
-35%
-21%
-42%
-60%
-38%
Reader / Idle
721
253
-65%
513
-29%
349
-52%
201
-72%
221
-69%
WiFi v1.3
419
197
-53%
251
-40%
191
-54%
142
-66%
180
-57%
Load
72
81
13%
76
6%
57
-21%
41
-43%
81
13%

Pro

+ Ruído da ventoinha relativamente silencioso durante uso leve; sem tendências para pulsar
+ Design mate atraente; qualidade de construção muito robusta e densa
+ Sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU durante os jogos; desempenho estável
+ Iluminação mias brilhante da tela que a do Blade Pro GTX 1080
+ Forte barra de dobradiça; ângulo máximo de abertura de 150 graus
+ 2 slots DDR4 SODIMM; Baia para SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
+ Temperaturas geralmente frias da superfície
+ Suporte oficial para o Razer Core
+ Retro iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Thunderbolt 3 e HDMI 2.0
+ Duração da bateria surpreendentemente longa
+ Teclas com dimensões regulares
+ Tela IPS FHD de 120 Hz
+ Interior acessível
+ Optimus

Contra

- Tempos de resposta não impressionantes em preto-branco e cinza-cinza
- Menor capacidade da bateria que a do Blade Pro GTX 1080 SKU
- Ventoinhas barulhentas durante os jogos; maior tendência a pulsações
- Garantia padrão de apenas 1 ano
- Sem G-Sync ou mini-DisplayPort integrado
- Sem outras opções de telas
- Sem suporte para THX ou Sabre HiFi DAC
- Trackpad esponjoso; sem teclado numérico
- As teclas têm um deslocamento curto
- Pesado e caro
- Controles pobres da ventoinha
In review: Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220. Test model provided by Razer US
In review: Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220. Test model provided by Razer US

O Blade Pro é um portátil de jogos único. No papel, suas especificações não são nada especiais; a CPU i7-7700HQ, a GPU GTX 1060 e a tela IPS 1080p são padrão em sistemas mais baratos como o Gigabyte Aero 15Asus FX502, ou Gigabyte P55W. Os jogadores com orçamentos apertados podem não gostar do fato de que algo parecido com um Acer Aspire 7 possa se desempenhar de forma similar ao Blade Pro GTX 1060 custando centenas de dólares menos.

Em vez disso, as maiores fortalezas do Blade Pro estão em sua qualidade de construção, características térmicas e design exclusivo. O chassi é mais forte do que parece e objetivamente mais inflexível do que concorrentes mais finos como a série MSI GS, a série Asus Zephyrus, e a série Aorus X7. As séries EVGA SC17 e MSI GT73VR são talvez os contendores mais notáveis quando se trata de rigidez do chassi, mas mesmo estes são mais grossos e volumosos do que o Razer. O Blade Pro é um exemplo magistral de finura e estilo, sem sacrificar as fortes qualidades físicas de designs de portáteis de jogos maiores.

Alguns recursos de hardware, além do excelente chassi, também merecem ser elogiados. A RAM atualizável, a taxa de atualização de 120 Hz e o compartimento de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas são boas surpresas considerando que o Blade Pro, mais caro, não possui essas opções. As velocidades High Turbo Boost são sustentáveis e as temperaturas durante os jogos são mais baixas do que o esperado, na faixa de 60 a 70 °C. Até mesmo as temperaturas da superfície são notavelmente mais frias que os sistemas concorrentes. Este é um portátil de jogos fino sem muitas das falhas tradicionalmente associadas à categoria.

Existem algumas melhorias importantes que gostaríamos de ver para tornar os futuros SKUs ainda melhores. Em primeiro lugar, mais opções de telas com tempos de resposta mais rápidos de 3 ms/5 ms, definitivamente atrairão mais os jogadores hardcore, mesmo que isso signifique sacrificar os amplos ângulos de visão IPS. O Ghosting é muito menos um problema na maioria dos portáteis MSI e as séries mais recentes do Aorus X7, como resultado. Em segundo lugar, os controles da ventoinha melhorados via Synapse seria uma excelente adição, se os usuários desejassem ventoinhas mais silenciosas ao custo de temperaturas mais elevadas. O Blade Pro GTX 1060 já é muito silencioso quando não está jogando, mas se tornará tão barulhento quanto alternativas concorrentes quando estiver sob estresse. Finalmente, opções de GPU mais rápidas acrescentariam extraordinariamente mais valor ao sistema. O chassi foi projetado para alojar até uma GTX 1080 e as propriedades térmicas já são excelentes com a GTX 1060, então já dá para imaginar como funcionaria com uma GTX 1070 de gama média, ou inclusive uma GTX 1070 Max-Q.

Outros detalhes menores, como teclas com maior deslocamento, subwoofer, trackpad mais firme e opções integradas de mini DisplayPort, teriam dado ao sistema mais uma vantagem pelo preço. Mesmo assim, é difícil não gostar do que já oferece quando o sistema se sente tão bom quanto parece.

O Blade Pro GTX 1060 é o melhor dos dois mundos. É elegante e atraente como um portátil de jogo fino, mas com a qualidade de hardware mais forte e as temperaturas de funcionamento mais frias de uma alternativa mais grossa. O potencial para as GPUs Max-Q e telas com tempos de resposta mais rápidos ainda não foram realizados para este SKU específico.

Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 - 10/25/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
92 / 98 → 94%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
63 / 81 → 78%
Peso
56 / 10-66 → 82%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
94%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
84 / 90 → 93%
Audio
70%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
79%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro 2017 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, FHD)
Allen Ngo, 2017-11- 1 (Update: 2017-11-12)