Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Reforçado Getac S410 (i5-8550U)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/10/2018

Rugged Kaby Lake-R. O poder da CPU de um Ultrabook tradicional com os sinos e assobios de um portátil robusto. A menos que você planeje principalmente usar o Getac à noite, recomendamos que opte pelo SKU mais avançado com a luz de fundo mais brilhante.

Getac S410
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 23.20.16.4973
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 112 PPI, CMN N140BGE-E33, TN PED, CMN1492, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Base PCH
Disco rígido
CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A, 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 34.9 x 350 x 293
Bateria
46.6 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, 36 Meses Garantia, ruggedized
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 363 g
Preço
2100 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Left: Removable 2.5-inch SATA III bay
Left: Removable 2.5-inch SATA III bay
Right: USB 2.0, 3.5 mm audio, AC adapter, Mini-SIM, SD reader, USB 3.0, AC adapter
Right: USB 2.0, 3.5 mm audio, AC adapter, Mini-SIM, SD reader, USB 3.0, AC adapter
Rear: HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, RJ-45, Kensington Lock
Rear: HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, RJ-45, Kensington Lock
(Source: Getac)
(Source: Getac)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
149.7 MB/s ∼100% +85%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
136.2 MB/s ∼91% +68%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.1 MB/s ∼54%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.8 MB/s ∼49% -10%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.5 MB/s ∼18% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
237.5 MB/s ∼100% +178%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
179.6 MB/s ∼76% +110%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.5 MB/s ∼36%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼35% -3%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.1 MB/s ∼12% -66%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
630 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
624 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
197 MBit/s ∼30% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
661 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
538 MBit/s ∼81%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s ∼76% -7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼69% -15%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
223 MBit/s ∼34% -59%
229.5
cd/m²
233.6
cd/m²
221.1
cd/m²
255.8
cd/m²
265.1
cd/m²
239.8
cd/m²
250.2
cd/m²
273.8
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 273.8 cd/m² Médio: 245.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 265.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 457:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 14.24 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.94
ΔE Greyscale 14.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
61% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.03
Getac S410
CMN N140BGE-E33, TN PED, 14, 1366x768
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
B140XTN, AUO2E3C, TN LED, 14, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Sharp LQ140K1, IPS, 14, 1366x768
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Manufacturer unknown, ID: TMA1200, IPS, 12, 2160x1440
Dell Latitude 5491
AU Optronics AUO133D B140HAK, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Response Times
-14%
-58%
-35%
-34%
-48%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.2 (21.6, 19.6)
43.2 (16.8, 26.4)
-5%
43 (20, 23)
-4%
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
5%
30 (11, 19)
27%
38.4 (18.8, 19.6)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
14 (9.6, 4.4)
17.2 (11.2, 6)
-23%
27 (17, 10)
-93%
24.4 (12.8, 11.6)
-74%
29 (11, 18)
-107%
28.4 (16.4, 12)
-103%
PWM Frequency
877.2 (99)
200 (20)
-77%
685
-22%
Screen
-12%
35%
53%
131%
19%
Brightness middle
265.1
174.5
-34%
493
86%
334
26%
571
115%
189.4
-29%
Brightness
246
164
-33%
456
85%
313
27%
555
126%
196
-20%
Brightness Distribution
81
71
-12%
81
0%
89
10%
89
10%
82
1%
Black Level *
0.58
0.6
-3%
0.53
9%
0.41
29%
0.11
81%
0.2
66%
Contrast
457
291
-36%
930
104%
815
78%
5191
1036%
947
107%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
14.24
12.05
15%
11.08
22%
2.2
85%
22.7
-59%
6.74
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
26.66
27.5
-3%
15.11
43%
5.7
79%
34.14
-28%
25.5
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.94
4.34
-10%
4.73
-20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
14.2
14.8
-4%
11.99
16%
2.9
80%
13.6
4%
5.5
61%
Gamma
2.03 108%
1.4 157%
4.03 55%
2.34 94%
5.51 40%
2.37 93%
CCT
17152 38%
14529 45%
10872 60%
6855 95%
6998 93%
6740 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.7
35.7
-8%
36
-7%
65.3
69%
42.5
10%
37
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
56.2
-8%
56
-8%
91.8
50%
67.02
10%
53.8
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -13%
-12% / 14%
9% / 39%
49% / 93%
-15% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 877.2 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 877.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 877.2 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8781 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540Tooltip
Getac S410 UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø497 (492.45-538.66)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø344 (340.23-352.17)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G3 15 3579
Intel Core i5-8300H
168 Points ∼79% +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼77% 0%
Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U
163 Points ∼77%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=63)
160 Points ∼75% -2%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼66% -13%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
139 Points ∼65% -15%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
125 Points ∼59% -23%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Core i5-6300U
111 Points ∼52% -32%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼31% -60%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
31 Points ∼15% -81%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G3 15 3579
Intel Core i5-8300H
768 Points ∼25% +54%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
589 Points ∼19% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=65)
570 Points ∼18% +14%
Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U
498 Points ∼16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
493 Points ∼16% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35, max: 409.45) Points ∼13% -18%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
344 Points ∼11% -31%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Core i5-6300U
310 Points ∼10% -38%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼5% -67%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
100 Points ∼3% -80%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
163 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
498 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
49.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell Latitude 5491
GeForce MX130, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4269 Points ∼55% +8%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
3958 Points ∼51%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
3329 Points ∼43% -16%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
2972 Points ∼38% -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2364 Points ∼30% -40%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
4197 Points ∼69%
Dell Latitude 5491
GeForce MX130, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4174 Points ∼69% -1%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
3906 Points ∼64% -7%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3655 Points ∼60% -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3542 Points ∼58% -16%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
3518 Points ∼58% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4197 pontos
Ajuda
CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 553.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 522.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 203.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 211.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 514.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 460.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.85 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 73.99 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4354 Points ∼24% +148%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3682 Points ∼20% +109%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
2958 Points ∼16% +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2184 Points ∼12% +24%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, PRO 2500U
1945 Points ∼11% +11%
Getac S410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1758 Points ∼10%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1720 Points ∼9% -2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 1891, n=100)
1491 Points ∼8% -15%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1468 Points ∼8% -16%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1239 Points ∼7% -30%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1134 Points ∼6% -35%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
392 Points ∼2% -78%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4686 Points ∼9% +165%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4457 Points ∼9% +152%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
3041 Points ∼6% +72%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, PRO 2500U
2954 Points ∼6% +67%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2493 Points ∼5% +41%
Getac S410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1766 Points ∼3%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1687 Points ∼3% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=100)
1675 Points ∼3% -5%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1583 Points ∼3% -10%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1369 Points ∼3% -22%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1257 Points ∼2% -29%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
349 Points ∼1% -80%
3DMark 11 Performance
1983 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 74.633.129.4fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Carga
30.3 / 33.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
Dell Latitude 5491
GeForce MX130, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Noise
-5%
-3%
-5%
-7%
-19%
off / environment *
28.4
28.3
-0%
30.2
-6%
29.3
-3%
30.3
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
28.8
-1%
30.2
-6%
29.3
-3%
30.3
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Average *
28.4
28.8
-1%
30.2
-6%
29.3
-3%
30.3
-7%
29.5
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
29.1
-2%
30.2
-6%
29.9
-5%
30.5
-7%
31.5
-11%
Load Average *
30.3
31.3
-3%
30.2
-0%
32.5
-7%
30.5
-1%
46.2
-52%
Load Maximum *
33.3
40
-20%
31.7
5%
36.6
-10%
36.6
-10%
46.2
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 24.6 °C42.6 °C32.4 °C 
 24.6 °C32 °C27.4 °C 
 27 °C26.8 °C24.6 °C 
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C
44.6 °C36.2 °C25.6 °C
32.4 °C49 °C26.6 °C
26.4 °C27 °C29.2 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 33 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.942.52536.842.33137.542.34035.842.55034.243.36333.941.98032.942.410031.946.112531.746.316031.347.620030.248.12502951.631527.956.340027.957.450026.858.663026.262.780025.866.1100025.271.4125024.676.2160024.172.8200023.870.3250023.769.1315023.468.1400023.365.1500023.367.9630023.162.9800023.162.91000022.866.41250022.762.61600022.661.2SPL36.681.7N2.848.5median 24.6median 62.9Delta2.75.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGetac S410Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Getac S410 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.18 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.27 / 0.78 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.6 / 7.9 / 8.4 Watt
Carga midlight 32.8 / 34.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A, TN PED, 1366x768, 14
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1366x768, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Power Consumption
8%
-41%
8%
30%
Idle Minimum *
5.6
4.4
21%
6.8
-21%
3.33
41%
3.6
36%
Idle Average *
7.9
6.3
20%
13.4
-70%
6.9
13%
4.6
42%
Idle Maximum *
8.4
6.5
23%
16.8
-100%
8.2
2%
5.15
39%
Load Average *
32.8
36.3
-11%
35.2
-7%
29.4
10%
27
18%
Load Maximum *
34.3
38.3
-12%
36.3
-6%
43.4
-27%
29.2
15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 12min
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 46.6 Wh
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 33 Wh
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 97 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh
Dell Latitude 5491
8850H, GeForce MX130, 68 Wh
Battery Runtime
13%
101%
25%
52%
85%
Reader / Idle
937
1005
WiFi v1.3
312
352
13%
628
101%
390
25%
475
52%
577
85%
Load
106
76

Pro

+ Baia SATA III de 2,5 polegadas de fácil liberação
+ Mais sólido que o Toughbook CF-54
+ Opções de CPUs Intel de 8va ger. modernas
+ Chassi sólido semi-refroçado chassis
+ Em geral, ruído baixo da ventoinha

Contra

- O SKU básico não tem luz de fundo do teclado, webcam, VGA e outros recursos comuns
- A iluminação da tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Modulação por largura de pulso para controle de brilho
- As teclas do trackpad têm uma resposta desigual
- Manutenção mais difícil
- Leve ruído eletrônico
- Teclas de setas pequenas
In review: Getac S410. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King
In review: Getac S410. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King

O concorrente mais próximo do Getac S410 no momento é o Panasonic Toughbook CF-54. O Getac é a opção mais forte se o desempenho for prioridade, por causa de suas opções mais rápidas de CPU e GPU, tela mais rígida, ventiladores mais silenciosos, alto-falantes mais fortes e luz de fundo mais brilhante para a configuração básica. Por outro lado, fica aquém de alguns aspectos chave. A capacidade de manutenção é mais difícil e a modulação por largura de pulso está presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho, o que pode afetar os usuários sensíveis à oscilação na tela. Seu chassi também é maior e mais pesado que a alternativa da Panasonic.

Assim como no Panasonic, a qualidade da tela é uma das características mais fracas do Getac. Não podemos falar pela opção 1080 de gama mais alta, mas aplicando do nosso perfil ICC à opção básica de 768p resolve a baixa precisão de escala de cinza e cores das configurações padrão. Os usuários devem considerar investir no recurso mais brilhante "Sunlight Readable" se o uso em exteriores frequente for esperado.

Hardware moderno de CPU e GPU em um design robusto para uma primeira impressão poderosa quando comparado aos seus concorrentes. Esperançosamente, futuras revisões derrubarão a opção de tela de 768p abaixo do padrão para uma qualidade mais alta e um painel mais brilhante nas configurações básicas.

Getac S410 - 10/08/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
68%
Conectividade
50 / 80 → 63%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Bateria
83%
Pantalha
76%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
93 / 92 → 100%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
97%
Audio
50%
Médio
74%
82%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Reforçado Getac S410 (i5-8550U)
Allen Ngo, 2018-10-10 (Update: 2018-10-20)