Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang GK5CP6V): Gamer econômico.

Jogos para as massas. O XMG Core 15 da Schenker Technologies é um portátil para jogos, comparativamente leve e compacto, disponível com bom equipamento por menos de 1.500 Euros (~$1637). Descubra nesta análise, como conversível de 15 polegadas, se sai contra os concorrentes.
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (XMG Core 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 436.48, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, 64 GB máx.
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 e 1x 2,5 pol.
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: microfone, fones, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26 x 360 x 244
Bateria
46 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 Watts, pen drive USB com software e controladores, acessporio para slot para unidade de 2,5 polegadas, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.99 kg, Suprimento de energia: 420 g
Preço
1476 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.3 %
02/2020
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.2 %
09/2019
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.9 %
10/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2 kg18.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.5 %
06/2019
Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg24.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
08/2019
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.2 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
11/2019
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.3 kg23.2 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 244 mm 26 mm 2 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.1 kg361.4 mm 254.2 mm 23.2 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +328%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +367%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s
Aorus 15-SA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s -40%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s -42%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
653 (615min - 670max) MBit/s -43%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
630 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1380 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
672 (658min - 682max) MBit/s -51%
Aorus 15-SA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
670 MBit/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s -53%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
619 MBit/s -55%
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V: 14.34 ∆E min: 4.6 - max: 26.66 ∆E
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V test chart
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V test chart
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
295
cd/m²		287
cd/m²		295
cd/m²
288
cd/m²		324
cd/m²		285
cd/m²
284
cd/m²		312
cd/m²		293
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 295.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.49
ΔE Greyscale 4.01 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080		Aorus 15-SA
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
AUO, B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
2%
2%
2%
0%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.3
65.3
3%
66.5
5%
64.3
2%
63.6
0%
64.1
1%
sRGB Coverage
91.2
91.8
1%
90.8
0%
93.6
3%
91.7
1%
93
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65
66.5
2%
66.5
2%
65.6
1%
65.2
0%
65.7
1%
Response Times
-26%
21%
-50%
-8%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
13.6 ?(7.2, 6.4)
-55%
6.4 ?(3.4, 3)
27%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
-77%
8.8 ?(4, 4.4)
-0%
15 ?(8, 7)
-70%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
10 ?(6, 4)
4%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
15%
12.8 ?(8.4, 4.4)
-23%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-15%
9 ?(5, 4)
13%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
Screen
-11%
-15%
-1%
-6%
-4%
Brightness middle
324
312.7
-3%
297.7
-8%
266
-18%
299
-8%
325
0%
Brightness
296
305
3%
280
-5%
254
-14%
290
-2%
310
5%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
84
-5%
90
2%
89
1%
82
-7%
Black Level *
0.27
0.27
-0%
0.43
-59%
0.28
-4%
0.29
-7%
0.255
6%
Contrast
1200
1158
-3%
692
-42%
950
-21%
1031
-14%
1275
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.07
4.57
-12%
3.13
23%
3.11
24%
3.7
9%
4.28
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.39
6.81
-7%
7.1
-11%
5.84
9%
7
-10%
8.42
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.49
2.91
-95%
3.06
-105%
1.37
8%
2
-34%
1.45
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.01
4.3
-7%
1.9
53%
3.94
2%
4.1
-2%
5.01
-25%
Gamma
2.6 85%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.53 87%
2.19 100%
2.6 85%
CCT
7350 88%
7098 92%
6325 103%
6210 105%
7166 91%
7678 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59.4
1%
59.2
0%
60
2%
59.3
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91.3
0%
90.5
-1%
93
2%
91.5
1%
93
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -10%
3% / -7%
-16% / -6%
-5% / -5%
-11% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1012 (995.35-1103.17)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø925 (918.74-983.02)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1248 (1233.43-1260.16)
Aorus 15-SA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1093 (1085.04-1129.94)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1157 (1151.34-1211.72)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1113 (1102.29-1169.32)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
468 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
459 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
458 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
447 Points
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
420 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
419 Points -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
3015 Points +41%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
2599 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2595 Points +21%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2419 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
2140 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
2074 Points -3%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
187 Points -2%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
170 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
1268 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
1170 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1155 (899.54min - 1211.72max) Points +5%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1130 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
1103 (995.35min - 1103.17max) Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
964 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1103 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
125 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
191 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5761 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5716 Points +19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5301 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5279 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5273 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4807 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Aorus 15-SA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
5%
-4%
4%
7%
11%
Write 4K
102
135
32%
156
53%
104
2%
158.8
56%
108.7
7%
Read 4K
41.39
41.1
-1%
60.7
47%
55.1
33%
29.11
-30%
44.91
9%
Write Seq
1649
1427
-13%
968
-41%
1519
-8%
1584
-4%
2424
47%
Read Seq
1367
1494
9%
1619
18%
2486
82%
1694
24%
1617
18%
Write 4K Q32T1
379
494.9
31%
485
28%
320.5
-15%
536
41%
356.9
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
401.2
578
44%
337.3
-16%
431.8
8%
363.9
-9%
557
39%
Write Seq Q32T1
3276
1417
-57%
969
-70%
1498
-54%
2536
-23%
2542
-22%
Read Seq Q32T1
3417
3251
-5%
1825
-47%
2868
-16%
3458
1%
3218
-6%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3417 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3276 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 401.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 379 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1367 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1649 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 102 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
17351 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35204 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13267 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5724 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø55.8 (51-61)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
15164 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
15054 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14922 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14753 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14358 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14288 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5931 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5661 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5616 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5607 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5335 Points -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20862 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20311 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19924 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19553 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19435 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19329 Points -3%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
104.3 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
101 (84min) fps
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
97.5 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
95.9 fps -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
93 (84min - 103max) fps -8%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
57.1 (46min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
55.2 fps +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
54.6 (48min - 62max) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
54.2 (42min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
53.1 (50min, 51P1 - 58max) fps -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
51.6 fps -5%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 101 54.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 144 131 124 118
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 92.7 78.6
Apex Legends (2019) 131 108 107
Anthem (2019) 75.2 73.2 71
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 144 123 65.6
The Division 2 (2019) 98 78 57
Control (2019) 69.2 50.7
Borderlands 3 (2019) 91.7 61.7 46.6
FIFA 20 (2019) 192 181 179
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 79 70 51
GRID 2019 (2019) 119 90.5 61.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 99 88.1 71.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 87.9 79.7 67.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 94.7 84.9 77.7
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 75.3 50.5 31.2
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.332.931.53232.62540.641.342.53838.5313333.431.630.733.74035.933.531.629.232.85046.541.332.628.936.96344.234.827.42636.18035.130.926.526.840.110032.932.525.724.628.812534.43326.725.129.91603534.328.825.732.420030.626.924.522.730.525031.627.123.220.931.631532.525.22320.433.540034.823.822.919.63750035.923.820.918.837.263035.622.919.617.937.880037.12219.417.438100037.221.819.117.439.7125037.62218.618.139.6160036.820.818.917.939.7200038.123.418.317.540.7250036.419.917.817.438.9315037.118.917.817.540.4400037.518.417.417.539.550003418.217.717.639.2630030.91817.717.435.4800029.218.117.617.533.41000025.518.117.817.731.21250021.718.217.717.526.21600018.918.217.917.721.3SPL4833.5313050.7N6.52.11.61.37.7median 34.8median 22median 18.9median 17.7median 37Delta3.83.82.31.54.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 31 / 33 dB
Carga
48 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Noise
5%
2%
-9%
10%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.5
5%
28.2
6%
29
3%
29.3
2%
30.2
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.3
-1%
28.7
4%
32
-7%
29.3
2%
31
-3%
Idle Average *
31
30.5
2%
30.5
2%
35
-13%
29.3
5%
31
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
30.5
8%
31
6%
41
-24%
29.3
11%
31
6%
Load Average *
48
41
15%
39
19%
54
-13%
35.7
26%
41.5
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
48
6%
54.2
-6%
52
-2%
44.2
13%
46.7
8%
Load Maximum *
51
51.9
-2%
59.6
-17%
56
-10%
45.6
11%
46.9
8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 46 °C48 °C42 °C 
 44 °C45 °C40 °C 
 28 °C33 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
56 °C59 °C45 °C
53 °C50 °C32 °C
27 °C26 °C24 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Heat
-20%
-15%
-6%
-12%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
52
-8%
49.8
-4%
44
8%
42.7
11%
52
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
59
52.2
12%
63.2
-7%
58
2%
52.7
11%
46.3
22%
Idle Upper Side *
27
38
-41%
32
-19%
30
-11%
33.1
-23%
24.8
8%
Idle Bottom *
28
40.4
-44%
36.2
-29%
34
-21%
41
-46%
25.4
9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203234.5253839.43130.7354029.229.65028.932.7632628.98026.827.810024.626.212525.130.616025.732.120022.732.425020.945.331520.453.540019.658.250018.860.363017.965.180017.472100017.469.9125018.161.6160017.962.1200017.563.1250017.460.1315017.559.8400017.559.7500017.662.2630017.461.1800017.559.31000017.754.31250017.554.81600017.748.5SPL3076.1N1.335.9median 17.7median 59.7Delta1.57.140.74438.340.540.838.837.938.538.63938.540.135.436.634.338.835.142.233.649.532.952.732.359.131.964.730.867.93168.330.170.330.171.130.872.729.170.228.770.828.668.528.56828.365.92867.527.96127.858.527.856.927.753.927.549.827.447.441.180.14.247.3median 29.1median 64.71.58.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6VRazer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 9 / 12 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 86 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Power Consumption
-67%
-77%
-47%
-24%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
9
18.7
-108%
17.6
-96%
20
-122%
14.5
-61%
17.2
-91%
Idle Average *
12
30.7
-156%
24.7
-106%
23
-92%
18.5
-54%
22.6
-88%
Idle Maximum *
18
33.9
-88%
56.3
-213%
29
-61%
20
-11%
25.5
-42%
Load Average *
86
93.4
-9%
111.1
-29%
87
-1%
81.6
5%
88
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126
158.9
-26%
149
-18%
136
-8%
132
-5%
Load Maximum *
173
195.3
-13%
170
2%
173
-0%
208.1
-20%
177
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 44min
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 58.75 Wh
Battery Runtime
53%
57%
37%
2%
15%
Reader / Idle
364
424
16%
208
-43%
240
-34%
298
-18%
WiFi v1.3
216
330
53%
268
24%
169
-22%
145
-33%
210
-3%
Load
44
101
130%
122
177%
76
73%
73
66%
H.264
166
202

Pro

+ Individualmente configurável
+ Peso moderado
+ Bom painel IPS
+ Marcos finos
+ 144 Hz

Contra

- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen2
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Duração curta da bateria
Schenker XMG Core 15, test unit provided by bestware.com
Schenker XMG Core 15, test unit provided by bestware.com

Em nosso teste, o XMG Core 15 provou ser uma alternativa real aos produtos de fabricantes maiores (Acer, Asus, Lenovo, etc.).

A um preço acessível, a Schenker Technologies oferece um portátil de 15 polegadas adequado para jogos que também oferece um painel IPS bom e responsivo. A iluminação RGB do teclado também agradará aos jogadores. Graças ao seu baixo peso e dimensões compactas, o Core 15 também é surpreendentemente móvel, se você desconsiderar a duração medíocre da bateria.

O produtor de Barebone, Tongfang, poderia fazer algumas melhorias no equipamento de conexões (já que não há Thunderbolt 3 nem USB-3.1 Gen2) e - como muitas vezes no segmento de jogos - o desenvolvimento de ruído sob uso intenso também poderia ganhar algumas melhorias.

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V - 02/09/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
59 / 80 → 74%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Bateria
55 / 95 → 58%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
69%
Camera
27 / 85 → 31%
Médio
71%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (XMG Core 15 Serie)
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Core 15 M22 em re...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Sche...
|
Notícias
•
O Ryzen 7, no Schenker XMG Cor...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Sche...

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang GK5CP6V): Gamer econômico.
Florian Glaser, 2020-02-19 (Update: 2020-03- 3)