Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang GK5NR0O): Gamer AMD com uma boa relação de preço-desempenho
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (XMG Core 15 Serie)
Processador
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1005 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 451.67, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-3200 @ 1600 MHz, dual-channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LM156LF-1F02, IPS, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB
, 420 GB livre
peso
2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 424 g
Preço
1460 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.1 % | 10/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.3 % | 02/2020 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.6 % | 09/2020 | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % | 06/2020 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.7 % | 06/2020 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | 2.4 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
17.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LM156LF-1F02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 312 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 290 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 1560:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.105
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 AU Optronics AUO80ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -3% | -41% | -41% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 63.3 -6% | 64.6 -4% | 38.8 -42% | 38.92 -42% | 63 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.9 | 91.2 -5% | 93.9 -2% | 57.8 -40% | 58.5 -39% | 90.1 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.5 | 65 -5% | 66.4 -3% | 40.09 -41% | 40.22 -41% | 64.1 -6% |
| Response Times | 0% | -15% | -124% | -202% | -63% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.6 ? | 8.8 ? 8% | 14 ? -46% | 26 ? -171% | 34 ? -254% | 20.4 ? -113% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 10.4 ? -8% | 8 ? 17% | 17 ? -77% | 24 ? -150% | 10.8 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | |||||
| Screen | 7% | -1% | -22% | -21% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 312 | 324 4% | 301 -4% | 301 -4% | 280 -10% | 292 -6% |
| Brightness | 290 | 296 2% | 298 3% | 277 -4% | 254 -12% | 290 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 81 -7% | 77 -11% | 88 1% | 77 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.27 -35% | 0.23 -15% | 0.26 -30% | 0.15 25% | 0.27 -35% |
| Contrast | 1560 | 1200 -23% | 1309 -16% | 1158 -26% | 1867 20% | 1081 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.84 | 4.07 16% | 4.68 3% | 5.12 -6% | 5.89 -22% | 3.99 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.85 | 6.39 54% | 8.86 36% | 19 -37% | 6.11 56% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.77 | 1.49 16% | 1.87 -6% | 4.88 -176% | 4.79 -171% | 3.02 -71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9 | 4.01 55% | 5.79 36% | 3.47 61% | 4.08 55% | 3.3 63% |
| Gamma | 2.105 105% | 2.6 85% | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 8099 80% | 7350 88% | 7706 84% | 7062 92% | 7303 89% | 7047 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68 | 59 -13% | 61 -10% | 37 -46% | 37 -46% | 58.1 -15% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 91 -1% | 94 2% | 57 -38% | 58 -37% | 89.7 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
4% | -6% /
-3% | -62% /
-38% | -88% /
-48% | -24% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1012 (995.35-1103.17)
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1119 (1067.81-1225.19)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5197 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5983 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5427 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -30% | -46% | -35% | -35% | -35% | -16% | |
| Write 4K | 233 | 102 -56% | 99.6 -57% | 145.4 -38% | 219.8 -6% | 142.1 -39% | 159.2 ? -32% |
| Read 4K | 54.5 | 41.39 -24% | 38.8 -29% | 51.6 -5% | 50.2 -8% | 46.43 -15% | 48.5 ? -11% |
| Write Seq | 3050 | 1649 -46% | 1117 -63% | 1007 -67% | 979 -68% | 1108 -64% | 2114 ? -31% |
| Read Seq | 3042 | 1367 -55% | 1030 -66% | 1145 -62% | 1990 -35% | 1622 -47% | 2044 ? -33% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 520 | 379 -27% | 445.2 -14% | 468.4 -10% | 516 -1% | 467 -10% | 435 ? -16% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 546 | 401.2 -27% | 331.8 -39% | 528 -3% | 298.3 -45% | 525 -4% | 508 ? -7% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3241 | 3276 1% | 1102 -66% | 1381 -57% | 982 -70% | 1203 -63% | 3238 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3538 | 3417 -3% | 2227 -37% | 2291 -35% | 1907 -46% | 2288 -35% | 3499 ? -1% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 981 | 2067 ? | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 300.9 | 1064 ? | |||||
| AS SSD | -20% | -68% | -55% | -53% | -74% | -10% | |
| Seq Read | 2836 | 2261 -20% | 1305 -54% | 2012 -29% | 1682 -41% | 1386 -51% | 2640 ? -7% |
| Seq Write | 2452 | 2393 -2% | 767 -69% | 1261 -49% | 904 -63% | 1234 -50% | 2500 ? 2% |
| 4K Read | 60.4 | 54.6 -10% | 41.84 -31% | 43.66 -28% | 60.2 0% | 41.32 -32% | 54.8 ? -9% |
| 4K Write | 190.5 | 118.4 -38% | 90.1 -53% | 109.3 -43% | 164.8 -13% | 128 -33% | 141.2 ? -26% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1283 | 1376 7% | 773 -40% | 851 -34% | 472.5 -63% | 854 -33% | 1345 ? 5% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2298 | 2299 0% | 711 -69% | 780 -66% | 845 -63% | 721 -69% | 2116 ? -8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.034 | 0.07 -106% | 0.09 -165% | 0.117 -244% | 0.087 -156% | 0.098 -188% | 0.0475 ? -40% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.02 | 0.031 -55% | 0.04 -100% | 0.036 -80% | 0.02 -0% | 0.095 -375% | 0.02775 ? -39% |
| Score Read | 1627 | 1657 2% | 945 -42% | 1096 -33% | 701 -57% | 1034 -36% | 1664 ? 2% |
| Score Write | 2734 | 2657 -3% | 878 -68% | 1016 -63% | 1101 -60% | 973 -64% | 2507 ? -8% |
| Score Total | 5184 | 5175 0% | 2290 -56% | 2643 -49% | 2143 -59% | 2536 -51% | 5023 ? -3% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2039 | 1481 -27% | 675 -67% | 1284 -37% | 1989 ? -2% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 438 | 467.5 7% | 248.4 -43% | 401.9 -8% | 442 ? 1% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1137 | 734 -35% | 535 -53% | 1013 -11% | 1121 ? -1% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-24% | -57% /
-59% | -45% /
-48% | -44% /
-46% | -55% /
-60% | -13% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read:
2591 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2506 MB/s
512K Read:
2180 MB/s
512K Write:
2587 MB/s
4K Read:
65 MB/s
4K Write:
139.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
510 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
480.5 MB/s
Constant Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18520 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36445 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14633 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6145 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74.4 - 131, n=33) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø57.6 (51-62)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 156 | 143 | 112 | 62 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 219.5 | 105 | 58.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.9 | 109.6 | 94 | 90.8 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 89.1 | 75.9 | 64.7 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 95 | 87 | 81 | 76 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 111.1 | 77.9 | 68.5 | 63.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 26 / 30 / 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 46 / 48 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | 0% | -3% | -3% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 30 -20% | 26.7 -7% | 30.7 -23% | 30.2 -21% | 28 -12% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 30 -15% | 27.1 -4% | 30.7 -18% | 30.2 -16% | 28 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 31 -3% | 27.1 10% | 30.7 -2% | 30.2 -1% | 28 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 33 -3% | 30.8 4% | 30.7 4% | 30.2 6% | 28 12% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 48 -4% | 45.3 2% | 36.6 20% | 40 13% | 28 39% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 51 -6% | 48.7 -1% | 47 2% | 49 -2% | 50.6 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 51 -6% | 48.7 -1% | 50.9 -6% | 49 -2% | 50.6 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | -5% | 13% | 15% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 48 6% | 50.3 1% | 46.3 9% | 42.9 16% | 53 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 64 | 59 8% | 58.6 8% | 44.4 31% | 49.9 22% | 57.6 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 27 7% | 33.9 -17% | 28.1 3% | 27.8 4% | 27.4 6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 28 12% | 36.3 -13% | 29.4 8% | 27 16% | 31 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 12 / 14 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
103 / 193 Watt |
   
| |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 7% | 28% | 18% | 20% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12 | 9 25% | 7 42% | 3.2 73% | 5.4 55% | 6.5 46% | 13.8 ? -15% |
| Idle Average * | 14 | 12 14% | 10.2 27% | 8.3 41% | 10 29% | 10.6 24% | 19.2 ? -37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 18 10% | 15 25% | 8.7 56% | 10.5 47% | 11 45% | 26.9 ? -35% |
| Load Average * | 103 | 86 17% | 147 -43% | 82 20% | 135 -31% | 84.1 18% | 111.1 ? -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 125 | 126 -1% | 131 -5% | 151 -21% | 144 -15% | 152.9 -22% | |
| Load Maximum * | 193 | 173 10% | 197 -2% | 195 -1% | 147 24% | 180.4 7% | 251 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46 Wh | Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 68 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -37% | -3% | 37% | 13% | 16% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 469 | 364 -22% | 449 -4% | 848 81% | 587 25% | 671 43% | 544 ? 16% |
| H.264 | 371 | 554 49% | 322 -13% | 399 ? 8% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 354 | 216 -39% | 314 -11% | 433 22% | 370 5% | 372 5% | 368 ? 4% |
| Load | 87 | 44 -49% | 93 7% | 84 -3% | 116 33% | 87 0% | 84.4 ? -3% |
Pro
+ Relativamente fino e leve para esta faixa de preço
+ Design simples e modesto
+ HDMI + 2 miniDP
+ WLAN veloz
+ Manutenção simples
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Boa tela
+ Alto desempenho da CPU
+ SSD rápido (dependendo da configuração)
Contra
- As dobradiças poderiam ser mais firmes
- Rangidos na base, que pode ser facilmente pressionada
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Leitor SD ruim
- Problemas de latência
- Potência gráfica um pouco abaixo da média
- Perda de desempenho no modo bateria
- O lado inferior pode esquentar bastante
- Consumo de energia relativamente alto durante a operação inativa
Veredict - Schenker econômico com hardware poderoso
Atualmente, uma atualização de hardware faz mais sentido do que nunca. Os novos processadores Zen 2 da AMD elevaram o desempenho do portátil a novos domínios neste momento, e uma RTX 2060 em vez da GTX 1660 Ti como companheira do Ryzen 7 é apenas consequente. No entanto, o aumento de desempenho do 1660 Ti resultou menor do que o esperado. Por outro lado, o desempenho da CPU está além de qualquer dúvida e o WLAN e a tela também são capazes de convencer.
Mas aqueles que pensam que o tamanho relativamente compacto e o peso comparativamente baixo fazem do XMG a máquina de jogos móvel perfeita, ficarão decepcionados com o afogamento massivo do desempenho gráfico no modo de bateria. Além disso, o Schenker consome mais energia durante a operação inativa do que seria realmente necessário com Optimus, e também fica muito quente sob uso intenso.
Enquanto o Schenker XMG Core 15 oferece hardware poderoso em uma carcaça bastante fina por um preço baixo de menos de 1.500 Euros (~$ 1.745), ele estraga seu potencial de mobilidade com forte afogamento no modo de bateria. Conectado, particularmente o desempenho do CPU é emocionante, mas a RTX 2060 é um pouco mais rápida na maioria dos concorrentes.
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
-
09/25/2020 v7
Christian Hintze
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
