Notebookcheck Logo

Sem RTX? Sem Problema — Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Modelo Básico

Faster than any other Blade 15 GTX laptop. O GTX 1660 Ti é apenas um pouco mais lento que o RTX 2060 em potência bruta da GPU, vendendo a varejo por centenas a menos e consegue superar a configuração mais rápida do Blade 15 Pascal. Algumas desvantagens ocultas, como a tela um pouco menos precisa e o desempenho mais lento da CPU, diminuem muito pouco a experiência geral.
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 436.30, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, BOE0804, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, Secundário: Seagate ST1000LM048
Placa de Som
NVIDIA TU116
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 355 x 235
Bateria
65 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Razer Central, Synapse, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 691 g
Preço
1800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

360.5 mm 276 mm 18.3 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Type-A, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.4, Kensington Lock
Right: Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Type-A, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.4, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, 3.5 mm combo audio
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
718 MBit/s +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
507 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
688 MBit/s +6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
656 MBit/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s
307.7
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
310.7
cd/m²
294.2
cd/m²
312.7
cd/m²
291.8
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
322.5
cd/m²
299.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV156FHM-N4K tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 322.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 304.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.94 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1158:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
4%
1%
1%
27%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
66.9
2%
65.3
0%
65.3
0%
88.1
35%
65.3
0%
sRGB Coverage
91.8
98.1
7%
94.9
3%
95.1
4%
99.6
8%
95.5
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
68.5
3%
66.3
0%
65.9
-1%
91.8
38%
66.5
0%
Response Times
3936%
-20%
3932%
30%
3889%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.6 ?(7.2, 6.4)
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
6%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
-24%
16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
-21%
2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2)
83%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(6, 4)
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
-4%
11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4)
-16%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
12%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
76%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-12%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
23810 ?(10)
11805%
23810 ?(24)
11805%
59.5 ?(100)
-70%
23580 ?(24)
11690%
Screen
17%
7%
-17%
6%
6%
Brightness middle
312.7
293
-6%
314.7
1%
324.2
4%
421.2
35%
266
-15%
Brightness
305
270
-11%
312
2%
304
0%
417
37%
248
-19%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
90
0%
90
0%
94
4%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.29
-7%
0.38
-41%
0.38
-41%
0.31
-15%
Contrast
1158
1010
-13%
828
-28%
853
-26%
858
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.57
1.69
63%
2.56
44%
5.01
-10%
6.06
-33%
2.78
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.81
3.37
51%
4.89
28%
12.7
-86%
11.89
-75%
5.96
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.91
1.24
57%
1.71
41%
1.64
44%
0.91
69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
2.3
47%
3.4
21%
7.9
-84%
2.8
35%
3.58
17%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.3 96%
2.35 94%
2.15 102%
2.46 89%
CCT
7098 92%
6758 96%
6435 101%
8455 77%
6235 104%
7186 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.4
63
6%
60.7
2%
60.8
2%
81
36%
62
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.3
98.5
8%
94.6
4%
95.5
5%
99.6
9%
96
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1319% / 707%
-4% / 2%
1305% / 683%
21% / 16%
1299% / 691%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18080 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø925 (918.74-983.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points +19%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points +8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
174 Points +2%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
170 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points +89%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points +52%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points +23%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points +16%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
964 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points -12%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -16%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points -24%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
677 Points -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
45527 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
25656 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
7877 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
6421 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
278.5 s *
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.7 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.1 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
 
154.4 s *
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.7 s *
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
110.4 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
964 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4807 - 5829, n=15)
5531 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points +3%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5301 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4646 Points -12%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9405 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (8621 - 10098, n=15)
9360 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9109 Points -3%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
8791 Points -7%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7200 Points -23%
Productivity
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8200 Points +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (7241 - 8136, n=15)
7519 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7290 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
7180 Points -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6938 Points -5%
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7236 Points +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points +17%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
6675 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4426 - 7638, n=15)
6558 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5898 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5452 Points -8%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points +19%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4676 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4074 - 5217, n=11)
4518 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4380 Points +8%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
4207 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4074 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5749 Points +5%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5731 Points +5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5706 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5041 - 5913, n=12)
5540 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5480 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4074 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5480 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5301 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
23%
13%
29%
6%
-17%
Seq Read
1829
1832
0%
1925
5%
1723
-6%
2517
38%
1612
-12%
Seq Write
1315
1864
42%
2371
80%
1386
5%
924
-30%
1475
12%
4K Read
51.3
52.1
2%
37.2
-27%
43.25
-16%
59.1
15%
43.09
-16%
4K Write
106
108.3
2%
108.9
3%
98.3
-7%
126.5
19%
83.8
-21%
4K-64 Read
917
1159
26%
1177
28%
1078
18%
876
-4%
611
-33%
4K-64 Write
1212
1807
49%
1135
-6%
1456
20%
922
-24%
570
-53%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.05
21%
0.065
-3%
0.05
21%
0.042
33%
0.071
-13%
Access Time Write *
0.104
0.034
67%
0.108
-4%
0.039
62%
0.065
37%
0.045
57%
Score Read
1152
1394
21%
1407
22%
1294
12%
1186
3%
815
-29%
Score Write
1450
2102
45%
1481
2%
1693
17%
1141
-21%
802
-45%
Score Total
3177
4221
33%
3633
14%
3638
15%
2870
-10%
2039
-36%
Copy ISO MB/s
1539
2083
35%
2073
35%
3182
107%
2086
36%
Copy Program MB/s
513
496.5
-3%
576
12%
984
92%
454.2
-11%
Copy Game MB/s
1150
977
-15%
1426
24%
1824
59%
1141
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3251 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1417 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 578 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 494.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1494 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1427 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 135 MB/s
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
151390 Points +54%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
115893 Points +18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
107110 Points +9%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
107083 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
106170 Points +8%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
101481 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
98452 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (59839 - 104780, n=18)
94171 Points -4%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
91194 Points -7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
73739 Points -25%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
59375 Points -40%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
49314 Points -50%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
48409 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25126 Points +70%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
20718 Points +40%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points +31%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
18879 Points +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18153 Points +23%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
16024 Points +9%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
15696 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 16488, n=24)
14867 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14753 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14463 Points -2%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
10715 Points -27%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
9350 Points -37%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
7791 Points -47%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10243 Points +92%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7840 Points +47%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points +45%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6728 Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
6380 Points +20%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6131 Points +15%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
5913 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 6123, n=22)
5653 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5335 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4734 Points -11%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3478 Points -35%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
3470 Points -35%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
2536 Points -52%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
27762 Points +44%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points +37%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
24868 Points +29%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22723 Points +18%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
22128 Points +14%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
20765 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 22670, n=24)
20096 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19329 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18234 Points -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
13143 Points -32%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
9466 Points -51%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
13940 Points +22%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points +20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12460 Points +9%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12260 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (9500 - 13311, n=23)
12019 Points +5%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H
11904 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11416 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10749 Points -6%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10129 Points -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8855 Points -22%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
8540 Points -25%
3DMark 11 Performance
16594 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31563 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12926 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5406 pontos
Ajuda
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
87 fps +30%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87 fps +30%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
83 fps +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
76.7 fps +14%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
72 (59min) fps +7%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
70 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (62 - 73, n=8)
68.4 fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67 fps
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
47 fps -30%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34 fps -49%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
31 fps -54%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
7 fps -90%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.3 fps +58%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
69 fps +34%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
62 (43min - 74max) fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
61.7 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)
56.2 fps +9%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
56 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
51.6 fps
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
36.5 fps -29%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
36 fps -30%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
25.8 fps -50%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
9 fps -83%
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø47 (38-50)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 291.2 259.6 241.3 132.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 247.6 169.7 97.5 51.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 115 83 75 67
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Noise
8%
-11%
3%
-11%
4%
off / environment *
28.5
28.3
1%
28.3
1%
28.2
1%
30
-5%
28.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30.3
28.8
5%
28.5
6%
28.2
7%
31
-2%
28.4
6%
Idle Average *
30.5
28.8
6%
28.5
7%
28.2
8%
34
-11%
28.4
7%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
29
5%
49
-61%
30.4
-0%
39
-28%
29.6
3%
Load Average *
41
33.5
18%
49
-20%
43.8
-7%
46
-12%
43.5
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
45
6%
49
-2%
47.2
2%
53
-10%
45.7
5%
Load Maximum *
51.9
45.2
13%
55
-6%
47.2
9%
55
-6%
45.7
12%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
30.3 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB
Carga
41 / 51.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
 46.2 °C52 °C46 °C 
 42 °C50.2 °C42 °C 
 39 °C37.2 °C39.6 °C 
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C
42.2 °C52.2 °C42.8 °C
43.6 °C49 °C43.4 °C
41.2 °C43.6 °C40.6 °C
Máximo: 52.2 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  60 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.7 °C / -19.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.7442538.340.53140.838.84037.938.55038.6396338.540.18035.436.610034.338.812535.142.216033.649.520032.952.725032.359.131531.964.740030.867.95003168.363030.170.380030.171.1100030.872.7125029.170.2160028.770.8200028.668.5250028.568315028.365.940002867.5500027.961630027.858.5800027.856.91000027.753.91250027.549.81600027.447.4SPL41.180.1N4.247.3median 29.1median 64.7Delta1.58.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 GTX 1660 TiApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.56 / 1.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18.7 / 30.7 / 33.9 Watt
Carga midlight 93.4 / 195.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
19%
39%
2%
33%
16%
Idle Minimum *
18.7
12.5
33%
6.2
67%
21
-12%
8.7
53%
13.6
27%
Idle Average *
30.7
15.3
50%
9.6
69%
23
25%
13
58%
17.9
42%
Idle Maximum *
33.9
20.7
39%
21.2
37%
32
6%
14.3
58%
20.6
39%
Load Average *
93.4
90.2
3%
104.3
-12%
97
-4%
107.4
-15%
96
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
158.9
162
-2%
91.7
42%
148
7%
129
19%
154.6
3%
Load Maximum *
195.3
209.3
-7%
135.3
31%
213
-9%
151.5
22%
218.6
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
5h 30min
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
19%
-29%
1%
42%
28%
WiFi v1.3
330
393
19%
234
-29%
332
1%
467
42%
421
28%
Reader / Idle
953
359
554
910
545
Load
102
65
44
199
181

Pro

+ Baia secundária SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
+ Design minimalista atraente
+ Chassi rígido e de alta qualidade
+ Teclas de seta de tamanho completo
+ RAM atualizável
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Clickpad grande
+ Gigabit RJ-45

Contra

- Imã de digitais — talvez um revestimento oleofóbico no futuro?
- Os pousa palmas e oa adaptador de CA poderiam ser mais frios durante os jogos
- Tela não tão bem calibrada quanto o da série Blade 15 RTX
- PWM em todos os níveis de brilho até 99 por cento
- Desempenho do Core i7-9750H abaixo da média
- Ventiladores mais barulhentos e temperaturas mais altas
- Resposta suave do clickpad
In review: Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti. Test model provided by Razer US
In review: Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti. Test model provided by Razer US

No mundo dos portáteis, a GeForce RTX 2060 é somente cerca de 5 a 10 porcento mais rápido que a GTX 1660 Ti quando recursos específicos da RTX, como RT ou DLSS estão inabilitados. Se você não tiver interesse em tais opções, poderá economizar US$ 400 sem afetar muito a experiência de jogos com o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti. Isso por si só torna a nova configuração mais atraente para jogadores preocupados com o orçamento.

Embora o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti seja a opção Blade 15 Turing mais econômica, na verdade é mais rápida que a última geração GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q mais rápida por cerca de 10 a 15 porcento durante os jogos. Os usuários ainda estão tendo uma experiência de jogo superior ao que a melhor série Blade 15 Pascal tinha a oferecer nesse sentido.

Existem algumas desvantagens ocultas no Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti, além do que mencionamos sobre a carcaça. Em primeiro lugar, o PWM está presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho a uma frequência baixa o suficiente para afetar alguns usuários sensíveis à oscilação na tela. Em segundo lugar, a tela não está calibrada, assim como as telas da série Blade 15 RTX. A temperatura da cor, por exemplo, é um pouco mais fria do que deveria, de fábrica. Em terceiro lugar, o ruído do ventilador e a temperatura serão um pouco mais altos e mais quentes, respectivamente, uma vez que o Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti não possui resfriamento avançado de câmara de vapor. Em quarto lugar, os jogos parecem rodar um pouco mais rápido no modo Creator do que no modo Gaming, já que o desempenho da CPU é mais alto no modo Creator. Você também pode pular o modo Gaming por completo e ficar no modo Creator para obter o máximo desempenho.

A desvantagem mais notável é o desempenho da CPU, pois é mais lento do que no Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q ou 2080 Max-Q, embora todos eles alojem o mesmo processador Core i7-9750H. O déficit de ~15% não afetará muito o desempenho dos jogos, especialmente se o seu objetivo for apenas 60 FPS, mas é lamentável para entusiastas ou criadores de conteúdo que desejam cada gota de desempenho possível do Core i7-9750H.

Além das notas especiais acima, a maioria de nossos existing comments sobre a série Blade 15 se aplica aqui na configuração GTX 1660 Ti. As temperaturas da superfície, brilho, cores e até mesmo o consumo de energia estão muito próximos entre esses SKUs Blade 15 Turing, apesar das diferenças de desempenho.

Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti - 09/19/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
89 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
64 / 80 → 80%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
66 / 95 → 70%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
90%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
71%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Médio
76%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Sem RTX? Sem Problema — Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Modelo Básico
Allen Ngo, 2019-09-23 (Update: 2019-09-30)