Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 10.5

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/26/2017

Um ótimo tablet, mas não é um pro. . O iPad Pro 10.5 é a segunda geração da série Pro da Apple. Definitivamente a tela é a estrela do show. Não apenas cresceu em tamanho, mas também oferece 120 Hz, HDR e afirma ter cobertura do espaço de cores P3. O tablet está em caminho do topo com o SoC A10X, mas ainda não seria um substituto de portátil satisfatório.

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (iPad Pro Serie)
Processador
Apple A10X Fusion
Placa gráfica
Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4, 1.600 MHz
Pantalha
10.5 polegadas 4:3, 2224x1668 pixel 265 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , 64 GB 
, 51.32 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Touch ID, 3 axis gyro and acceleration sensor, barometer, digital compass, Smart Connector
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1.700/2.100, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), CDMA EV-DO Rev. A+B (800, 1.900 MHz), LTE Cat. 9 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.1 x 250.6 x 174.1
Bateria
30.8 Wh, 8134 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3,77 V, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, OIS, auto HDR, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, auto HDR, 1080p-video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes, Teclado: virtual, lightning cable, modular power adapter, Quick-Start Guide, security warnings and warranty information, 12 Meses Garantia, Porta lightning, fanless
peso
469 g, Suprimento de energia: 99 g
Preço
889 Euro

 

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 (front) and Apple iPad 12.9 (2017)
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - Touch ID
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - SIM tool
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - Nano-SIM slot
Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 - camera
Apple iPad Pro 10.5

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s ∼86%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼20% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
33.4 MBit/s ∼5% -94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s ∼87%
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼20% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.6 MBit/s ∼7% -92%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
The iPad Pro 10.5 without (left) and with (right) the True Tone function activated.
The iPad Pro 10.5 without (left) and with (right) the True Tone function activated.
634
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
665
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 665 cd/m² Médio: 625.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 634 cd/m²
Contraste: 1626:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.26
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Huawei MediaPad T3 10
IPS, 1280x800, 9.6
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1
Screen
1%
-3%
8%
-23%
-32%
-40%
Brightness
625
500
-20%
485
-22%
468
-25%
409
-35%
457
-27%
421
-33%
Brightness Distribution
87
93
7%
88
1%
82
-6%
92
6%
88
1%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.52
-33%
0.46
-18%
0.32
18%
0.25
36%
0.32
18%
Contrast
1626
1006
-38%
1117
-31%
1281
-21%
1944
20%
1403
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.9
1.1
42%
1.4
26%
1.8
5%
4.5
-137%
5.2
-174%
4.7
-147%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
1.4
50%
2.1
25%
1.2
57%
2
29%
4.1
-46%
4.5
-61%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.11 114%
2.22 108%
2.11 114%
2.17 111%
2.73 88%
2.22 108%
CCT
7027 93%
6662 98%
6647 98%
6500 100%
6930 94%
6579 99%
7122 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.97
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.55
99.06

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
217439 Points ∼95%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
175032 Points ∼77% -20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
168840 Points ∼74% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
144426 Points ∼63% -34%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128706 Points ∼56% -41%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
88989 Points ∼39% -59%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
77540 Points ∼34% -64%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9358 Points ∼51%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6443 Points ∼35% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4187 Points ∼23% -55%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2869 Points ∼16% -69%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3933 Points ∼81%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1906 Points ∼39% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1745 Points ∼36% -56%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1458 Points ∼30% -63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3085 Points ∼100% +52%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2036 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1754 Points ∼57% -14%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1520 Points ∼49% -25%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1094 Points ∼35% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
5459 Points ∼78%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3324 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3196 Points ∼46% -41%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2651 Points ∼38% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
977 Points ∼14% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3975 Points ∼78%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3268 Points ∼64% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2702 Points ∼53% -32%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2015 Points ∼40% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1180 Points ∼23% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2841 Points ∼94% +40%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
2030 Points ∼67% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2027 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1798 Points ∼59% -11%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1532 Points ∼51% -24%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1499 Points ∼50% -26%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1098 Points ∼36% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4537 Points ∼84%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
4107 Points ∼76% -9%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3883 Points ∼72% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2943 Points ∼55% -35%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2519 Points ∼47% -44%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
967 Points ∼18% -79%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
782 Points ∼15% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3590 Points ∼92% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3558 Points ∼92%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
3346 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points ∼66% -28%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1957 Points ∼50% -45%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1050 Points ∼27% -70%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
878 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2832 Points ∼94% +44%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1811 Points ∼60% -8%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1807 Points ∼60% -8%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1643 Points ∼55% -16%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1539 Points ∼51% -21%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1074 Points ∼36% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7212 Points ∼93%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
6127 Points ∼79% -15%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5877 Points ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4626 Points ∼60% -36%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4320 Points ∼56% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1431 Points ∼19% -80%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1304 Points ∼17% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4744 Points ∼95% +5%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4521 Points ∼91%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
4002 Points ∼80% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3438 Points ∼69% -24%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2584 Points ∼52% -43%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1473 Points ∼30% -67%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1350 Points ∼27% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21886 Points ∼30% +12%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20140 Points ∼28% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19534 Points ∼27%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
16023 Points ∼22% -18%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
13324 Points ∼19% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13056 Points ∼18% -33%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11515 Points ∼16% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110148 Points ∼24%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55725 Points ∼12% -49%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
50084 Points ∼11% -55%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
44645 Points ∼10% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34002 Points ∼7% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22041 Points ∼5% -80%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18258 Points ∼4% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54237 Points ∼28%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
40014 Points ∼20% -26%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
34015 Points ∼17% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30277 Points ∼15% -44%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
29326 Points ∼15% -46%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18320 Points ∼9% -66%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16773 Points ∼9% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
225 fps ∼17%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
117.1 fps ∼9% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92 fps ∼7% -59%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
91 fps ∼7% -60%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
80.8 fps ∼6% -64%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼2% -86%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼2% -86%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
59.4 fps ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps ∼13%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
56 fps ∼12% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps ∼7% -47%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼5% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
109 fps ∼20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
51 fps ∼9% -53%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼9% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps ∼9% -56%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
40.6 fps ∼7% -63%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼3% -87%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼3% -87%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
58 fps ∼16%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
35.1 fps ∼10% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps ∼9% -41%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps ∼8% -50%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.7 fps ∼8% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼4% -74%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps ∼3% -83%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
63 fps ∼15%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
39.5 fps ∼9% -37%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
33 fps ∼8% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼8% -49%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.5 fps ∼7% -55%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps ∼2% -85%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps ∼2% -89%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
43 fps ∼24%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
26.9 fps ∼15% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼11% -56%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18.5 fps ∼11% -57%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼9% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps ∼4% -84%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.6 fps ∼3% -87%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
30333 Points ∼61%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
19621 Points ∼40% -35%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18148 Points ∼37% -40%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11781 Points ∼24% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9531 Points ∼19% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8167 Points ∼16% -73%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8060 Points ∼16% -73%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
257 Points ∼34%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
225 Points ∼30% -12%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
205 Points ∼27% -20%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
162 Points ∼22% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points ∼18% -49%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
115 Points ∼15% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4419 ms * ∼7% -354%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3323.5 ms * ∼6% -242%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2760.3 ms * ∼5% -184%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2244.4 ms * ∼4% -131%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1546.3 ms * ∼3% -59%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1457.7 ms * ∼2% -50%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
972.7 ms * ∼2%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
200.59 Points ∼60%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
143 Points ∼43% -29%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128.6 Points ∼39% -36%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69.51 Points ∼21% -65%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.72 Points ∼15% -74%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.84 Points ∼13% -78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42.73 Points ∼13% -79%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.5 °C35.5 °C40.8 °C 
 34.2 °C36.4 °C40.6 °C 
 33.4 °C35.3 °C40.3 °C 
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C
35.2 °C35.3 °C34 °C
35 °C35.8 °C34.3 °C
34.7 °C34.9 °C33.2 °C
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  51.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Apple iPad Pro 10.5: heat image
Apple iPad Pro 10.5: heat image
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.12525.436.93125.335.84032.934.55033.630.76331.632.18028.429.91002742.512520.850.11602253.220021.357.525020.863.931521.265.240019.465.850019.567.263017.769.180017.967.3100017.872.6125017.375.7160017.477.9200016.777.7250017.274.4315018.275.1400017.970.7500017.667.9630017.763.9800017.855.91000017.956.41250018.158.81600018.260.9SPL3084.6N1.359.1median 17.9Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017median 65.8Delta1.37.531.639.825.430.725.330.632.933.533.632.231.630.328.425.92726.620.826.82236.221.346.320.861.321.27219.475.319.573.817.780.817.980.517.879.217.373.417.474.116.77217.268.518.267.717.970.717.672.817.76917.873.517.970.318.167.718.264.43086.51.371median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825median 70.71.38.331.637.525.435.825.330.832.927.833.632.531.630.428.429.52726.220.833.32243.521.352.920.856.521.263.919.468.119.570.317.772.817.976.517.876.917.374.817.473.916.772.417.272.618.275.517.97717.675.417.768.717.863.917.960.518.158.418.257.13085.91.365.9median 17.9Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KLmedian 68.71.38.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.44 / 6.12 / 6.14 Watt
Carga midlight 8.55 / 10.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Google Pixel C
 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
-3%
0%
18%
19%
Idle Minimum *
1.44
1.71
-19%
1.82
-26%
2.19
-52%
2.08
-44%
1.58
-10%
Idle Average *
6.12
7.55
-23%
4.26
30%
4.3
30%
3.5
43%
4.12
33%
Idle Maximum *
6.14
7.62
-24%
4.33
29%
4.37
29%
3.58
42%
4.15
32%
Load Average *
8.55
8.39
2%
9.82
-15%
8.62
-1%
6.97
18%
6.2
27%
Load Maximum *
10.62
12.08
-14%
13.99
-32%
11.26
-6%
7.4
30%
9.27
13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 56min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
11h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 19min
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Google Pixel C
 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL
7800 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
8%
20%
2%
15%
-15%
-16%
Reader / Idle
2036
1850
-9%
1496
-27%
1903
-7%
1985
-3%
2090
3%
1230
-40%
H.264
629
708
13%
845
34%
551
-12%
702
12%
740
18%
593
-6%
WiFi v1.3
693
779
12%
764
10%
760
10%
602
-13%
638
-8%
416
-40%
579
-16%
Load
199
186
-7%
225
13%
375
88%
222
12%
294
48%
248
25%

Pro

+ Muito boa tela
+ Wi-Fi veloz
+ Apple SIM adicional (apenas versões LTE)
+ SoC veloz
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Boas durações da bateria

Contra

- Sem suporte para Galileo GNSSl
- Carcaça sensível à pressão
- Apenas um ano de garantia
- A tela não suporta P3, apesar das afirmações
- Memória mais lenta que a do predecessor
- Longos tempos de carga
Review: Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Review: Apple iPad Pro 10.5

A Apple decidiu não fazer uma reengenharia completa do iPad Pro 10.5 e envez disso fez melhorias reais onde mais importa. Particularmente a nova tela é impressionante - suas ótimas propriedades refletivas e capacidades HDR serão particularmente interessantes para os fanáticos dos filmes, séries de TV e jogos. Infelizmente, não conseguimos medir o espaço de cores P3 prometido, mas apenas o espaço de cores sRGB menor. 

O tablet possui módulos de comunicação de alta qualidade mas ainda não suporta o posicionamento Galileo Europeu. A Apple não tentou economizar a memória, que é mais lenta que a do predecessor, mas isto não pe notório no uso diário.

Muitos pequenos detalhes do Apple iPad Pro 10,5 foram melhorados, e definitivamente é um dos melhores tablets disponível atualmente.

No geral, a Apple conseguiu criar um excelente produto e estabeleceu um padrão muito alto para os tablets. Seu único concorrente real é o Samsung Galaxy Tab S3, que, no entanto, possui um SoC antigo e menos armazenamento. A capacidade de armazenamento foi amentada, mas também o preço inicial: $649. O modelo menor (64 GB) será totalmente suficiente para a maioria dos usuários, especialmente porque áudio e vídeo são reproduzidos frequentemente hoje em dia. Sentimos que um segundo modelo com 256 GB é a melhor opção e é inclusive um pouco mais barato que o seu predecessor com a mesma capacidade de armazenamento. O modelo de 512-GB pode ser recomendado para usuários que desejem ter sua própria coleção multimídia disponível offline ou quem desejar usar o seu tablet para editar vídeos ou processar imagens.

O iPad Pro 10.5 tem um desempenho tão grande que você inclusive pode pensar em usa-lo como um substituto de portátil completo. Seja para a edição de vídeo de material UHD ou o processamento de imagens com Adobe Lightroom, o iPad Pro 10.5 funciona de forma rápida e eficiente, embora sintamos que o teclado Smart não é flexível o suficiente e funciona bem apenas sobre superfícies duras. Os problemas do navegador Safari com CMSs e ouros aplicativos web são perturbantes e o gerenciamento de arquivos é muito inflexível. Portanto, consideramos o iPad Pro um ótimo tablet, mas não para substituir um portátil.

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 - 06/26/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
77 / 80 → 96%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
49 / 65 → 76%
Peso
84 / 88 → 91%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
71 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 76 → 100%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
81 / 85 → 95%
Médio
82%
92%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 10.5
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-06-26 (Update: 2017-07- 3)