Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 9.7

Menor, porém, poderoso! Com o irmão menor de 12,9-polegadas do grande iPad Pro, a Apple também oferece um forte concorrente para o iPad Air 2. Já analisamos o elegante tablet com a câmera iPhone. Embora seja, mais uma vez, um produto exemplar, ainda há espaço para melhorias.
Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
pesquisar relação.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 (iPad Pro Serie)
Processador
Apple A9X 2 x 2.16 GHz, Cyclone 3
Placa gráfica
Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT
Memória
2048 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
9.70 polegadas 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 264 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multi-touch de 10-pontos, native pen support, IPS, DCI-P3 Color Gamut, True Tone, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe), 256 GB 
, 228 GB livre
Conexões
Conexões Audio: kombinierte Kopfhörer- und Mikrofonklinke (3,5 mm), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Giroscópio de 3-eixos, sesnor de luz ambiente, acelerômetro, barômetro, Porta Lightning, Air Play
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 e 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40 e 41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.1 x 240 x 169.5
Bateria
27.91 Wh, 7306 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3.82 Volt, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 9
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (autofoco, f/2.2, HDR, vídeo UHD)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo, f/2.4, HDR, vídeo 720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo lightning, guia rápido, 12 Meses Garantia, Apple SIM, Nano-SIM
peso
444 g, Suprimento de energia: 98 g
Preço
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

305.7 mm 220.6 mm 6.9 mm 723 g292.1 mm 201.4 mm 8.4 mm 1.1 kg267 mm 187 mm 8.7 mm 917 g254 mm 167 mm 6.1 mm 393 g247 mm 179 mm 4.68 mm 665 g240 mm 169.5 mm 6.1 mm 444 g240 mm 169.5 mm 6.1 mm 444 g237.3 mm 169 mm 5.6 mm 387 g
iPad Pro 9.7
iPad Pro 9.7
iPhone 6s Plus
iPhone 6s Plus
iPhone SE
iPhone SE

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
iPad Pro 9.7
iPad Pro 9.7
iPhone 6s Plus
iPhone 6s Plus
iPhone SE
iPhone SE
True Tone deactivated
True Tone deactivated
True Tone activated (daylight)
True Tone activated (daylight)
Night Shift: cold
Night Shift: cold
Night Shift: standard
Night Shift: standard
Night Shift: warm
Night Shift: warm
509
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 523 cd/m² Médio: 499.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.84 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 523 cd/m²
Contraste: 1006:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.08% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90
Apple iPad Air 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
Triluminos display with X-Reality, 2560x1600, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.70
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Screen
-20%
-34%
-175%
-26%
-134%
-134%
Brightness middle
523
399
-24%
423
-19%
471
-10%
358
-32%
429
-18%
385
-26%
Brightness
500
393
-21%
427
-15%
457
-9%
357
-29%
434
-13%
383
-23%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
92
-1%
92
-1%
86
-8%
82
-12%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.52
0.22
58%
0.61
-17%
0.46
12%
0.35
33%
0.41
21%
Contrast
1006
1814
80%
693
-31%
1024
2%
1226
22%
939
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.1
2.96
-169%
2.86
-160%
8.69
-690%
1.78
-62%
4.61
-319%
5.31
-383%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.9
9.28
-388%
8.57
-351%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3
-114%
2.37
-69%
11.24
-703%
1.38
1%
6.64
-374%
5.58
-299%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.21 100%
2.43 91%
2.17 101%
2.24 98%
2.42 91%
2.4 92%
CCT
6662 98%
7049 92%
6941 94%
9508 68%
6366 102%
6929 94%
7044 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.97
71.15
13%
88
40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.55
97.87
-2%
99
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
137 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 40 ms rise
↘ 97 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
3079 Points ∼63%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3200 Points ∼65% +4%
Apple iPad Air 2
1816 Points ∼37% -41%
Google Pixel C
1411 Points ∼29% -54%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1298 Points ∼26% -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1247 Points ∼25% -59%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1001 Points ∼20% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
5268 Points ∼8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5419 Points ∼8% +3%
Apple iPad Air 2
4530 Points ∼7% -14%
Google Pixel C
4216 Points ∼7% -20%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
3949 Points ∼6% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
4221 Points ∼7% -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
3190 Points ∼5% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
4002 Points ∼36%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
4061 Points ∼36% +1%
Apple iPad Air 2
2676 Points ∼24% -33%
Google Pixel C
2735 Points ∼24% -32%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1926 Points ∼17% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
946 Points ∼8% -76%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1384 Points ∼12% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6127 Points ∼37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
7525 Points ∼45% +23%
Apple iPad Air 2
3534 Points ∼21% -42%
Google Pixel C
4293 Points ∼26% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
843 Points ∼5% -86%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1426 Points ∼9% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1807 Points ∼33%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1555 Points ∼29% -14%
Apple iPad Air 2
1445 Points ∼27% -20%
Google Pixel C
1205 Points ∼22% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1641 Points ∼30% -9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1254 Points ∼23% -31%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
35.1 fps ∼10%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps ∼9% -5%
Apple iPad Air 2
27 fps ∼7% -23%
Google Pixel C
22 fps ∼6% -37%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
16 fps ∼4% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps ∼3% -66%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8.5 fps ∼2% -76%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
51 fps ∼6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps ∼9% +57%
Apple iPad Air 2
37.6 fps ∼4% -26%
Google Pixel C
40 fps ∼4% -22%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
26 fps ∼3% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps ∼2% -67%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
18 fps ∼2% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
26.9 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
54.3 fps ∼2% +102%
Apple iPad Air 2
11.5 fps ∼0% -57%
Google Pixel C
13 fps ∼0% -52%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
9.4 fps ∼0% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
5.8 fps ∼0% -78%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
39.5 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
83 fps ∼2% +110%
Apple iPad Air 2
17.9 fps ∼0% -55%
Google Pixel C
31 fps ∼1% -22%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
18 fps ∼0% -54%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
11 fps ∼0% -72%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
3181 Points ∼38%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points ∼39% +3%
Apple iPad Air 2
1967 Points ∼23% -38%
Google Pixel C
1909 Points ∼23% -40%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
1482 Points ∼18% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points ∼13% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1325 Points ∼16% -58%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6098 Points ∼37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points ∼38% +2%
Apple iPad Air 2
4104 Points ∼25% -33%
Google Pixel C
2724 Points ∼17% -55%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2488 Points ∼15% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points ∼17% -53%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1643 Points ∼10% -73%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
2185 Points ∼24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points ∼22% -7%
Apple iPad Air 2
832 Points ∼9% -62%
Google Pixel C
868 Points ∼10% -60%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
954 Points ∼11% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points ∼7% -73%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1141 Points ∼13% -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6485 Points ∼22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points ∼29% +30%
Apple iPad Air 2
4920 Points ∼17% -24%
Google Pixel C
6355 Points ∼22% -2%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2683 Points ∼9% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points ∼5% -79%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1886 Points ∼7% -71%
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1185 Points ∼55%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points ∼50% -8%
Apple iPad Air 2
1263 Points ∼58% +7%
Google Pixel C
884 Points ∼41% -25%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
758 Points ∼35% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points ∼30% -45%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
872 Points ∼40% -26%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
System (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
5511 Points ∼15%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5638 Points ∼16% +2%
Apple iPad Air 2
4979 Points ∼14% -10%
Google Pixel C
8618 Points ∼24% +56%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
8868 Points ∼25% +61%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
58793 Points ∼8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
59659 Points ∼8% +1%
Apple iPad Air 2
73235 Points ∼10% +25%
Google Pixel C
129085 Points ∼17% +120%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
119929 Points ∼16% +104%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
125281 Points ∼63%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
137071 Points ∼69% +9%
Apple iPad Air 2
72371 Points ∼36% -42%
Google Pixel C
14722 Points ∼7% -88%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
16552 Points ∼8% -87%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
16513 Points ∼0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
18483 Points ∼0% +12%
Apple iPad Air 2
13780 Points ∼0% -17%
Google Pixel C
5208 Points ∼0% -68%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7032 Points ∼0% -57%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
4072 Points ∼4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
4454 Points ∼4% +9%
Apple iPad Air 2
2956 Points ∼3% -27%
Google Pixel C
5215 Points ∼5% +28%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
5537 Points ∼6% +36%
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1176 Points ∼3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1174 Points ∼3% 0%
Apple iPad Air 2
1160 Points ∼3% -1%
Google Pixel C
3320 Points ∼7% +182%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
2887 Points ∼6% +145%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
168840 Points ∼58%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points ∼63% +9%
Apple iPad Air 2
101062 Points ∼34% -40%
Google Pixel C
90568 Points ∼31% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
70385 Points ∼24% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
19621 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
19852 Points ∼29% +1%
Apple iPad Air 2
10512 Points ∼15% -46%
Google Pixel C
7563 Points ∼11% -61%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
7790 Points ∼11% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points ∼10% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8197 Points ∼12% -58%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
 
Apple iPad Air 2 Apple A8X, PowerVR GXA6850, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel C Nvidia Tegra X1, NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
19621 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
19852 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4218 Points ∼6% -79%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
29991 Points ∼43% +53%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB SSD
6060 Points ∼9% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6885 Points ∼10% -65%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10512 Points ∼15% -46%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
9962 Points ∼14% -49%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points ∼23% -19%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
225 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
215 Points ∼27% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points ∼10% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79 Points ∼10% -65%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
158 Points ∼20% -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
144 Points ∼18% -36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points ∼24% -16%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
106 Points ∼13% -53%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
143 Points ∼35%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
142 Points ∼34% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21.936 Points ∼5% -85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.12 Points ∼10% -71%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points ∼29% -17%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
181 ms * ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1063.3 ms * ∼12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
104.5 ms * ∼1%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB SSD
739 ms * ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1016.2 ms * ∼11%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
291.1 ms * ∼3%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
329 ms * ∼4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
223 ms * ∼2%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
19567 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB SSD
6452 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7197 Points ∼37%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9355 Points ∼48%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
10452 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15529 Points ∼79%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1546.3 ms * ∼3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
1498.8 ms * ∼3% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7727.5 ms * ∼13% -400%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1178 ms * ∼2% +24%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3745, 32 GB SSD
5853 ms * ∼10% -279%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6483.2 ms * ∼11% -319%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2396 ms * ∼4% -55%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
2557 ms * ∼4% -65%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * ∼3% -13%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
1185 Points ∼55%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
1091 Points ∼50% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
637 Points ∼29% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
648 Points ∼30% -45%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1263 Points ∼58% +7%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
1059 Points ∼49% -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1199 Points ∼55% +1%

* ... smaller is better

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
2185 Points ∼24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
2027 Points ∼22% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
390 Points ∼4% -82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash
590 Points ∼7% -73%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
832 Points ∼9% -62%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
902 Points ∼10% -59%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1124 Points ∼12% -49%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value)
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
125281 Points ∼63%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
137071 Points ∼69% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2
Mali-T628 MP6, 5420 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19014 Points ∼10% -85%
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
72371 Points ∼36% -42%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD
66990 Points ∼34% -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
96768 Points ∼49% -23%
Carga Máxima
 41.3 °C42.3 °C38.5 °C 
 34.2 °C34.8 °C34.8 °C 
 32.5 °C32.7 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
39.8 °C40.6 °C40.1 °C
35.2 °C35.7 °C36.3 °C
31.9 °C32.8 °C31.9 °C
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 36 °C
alimentação elétrica  50.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.71 / 7.55 / 7.62 Watt
Carga midlight 8.39 / 12.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
27.91 Wh
Apple iPad Air 2
28 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
25.3 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh
Power Consumption
21%
-38%
8%
30%
-119%
Idle Minimum *
1.71
1.2
30%
2.69
-57%
2.3
-35%
1.6
6%
8.6
-403%
Idle Average *
7.55
5.1
32%
10.95
-45%
4.5
40%
4.13
45%
11.26
-49%
Idle Maximum *
7.62
5.4
29%
11.14
-46%
5
34%
4.22
45%
11.3
-48%
Load Average *
8.39
7.9
6%
11.54
-38%
9.4
-12%
6.57
22%
14.57
-74%
Load Maximum *
12.08
11.1
8%
12.8
-6%
10.4
14%
8.32
31%
14.9
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 06min
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
27.91 Wh, 94.3
Apple iPad Air 2
28 Wh, 95.3
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh, 93
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh, 91.8
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh, 90.3
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
25.3 Wh, 93
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet
22 Wh, 93
Battery Runtime
-11%
-3%
1%
-13%
-7%
-7%
Reader / Idle
1850
1364
-26%
1933
4%
1261
-32%
918
-50%
988
-47%
2135
15%
H.264
708
562
-21%
630
-11%
644
-9%
651
-8%
602
-15%
705
0%
WiFi v1.3
779
695
-11%
558
-28%
393
-50%
698
-10%
525
-33%
Load
186
212
14%
195
5%
323
74%
291
56%
266
43%
166
-11%
WiFi
630

Pro

+ Muito boa tela
+ Wi-Fi estável
+ Apple SIM (eSIM)
+ Ótimo módulo GPS
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ SoC veloz

Contra

- NFC apenas para Apple Pay
- Adaptador de força muito fraco e esquenta sob uso intenso
- O armazenamento da versão de 32 GB é mais lento
- Sem carga rápida
- Longos tempos de carregamento
- Preço alto
In review: Apple iPad Pro 9.7. Test model courtesy of Apple Germany.
In review: Apple iPad Pro 9.7. Test model courtesy of Apple Germany.

A Apple mais uma vez oferece um excelente produto com o iPad Pro de 9,7 polegadas, que convence com virtudes familiares e sofre com problemas antigos. Obtemos uma ótima tela, boas durações da bateria, melhores câmeras em um tablet, suporte para eSIM, suporte opcional para o Apple Pencil ou um teclado Smart. Este último, mais uma vez, somente está disponível com um layout QWERTY e finalmente gostaríamos de ver um adaptador mais poderoso, bem como a carga rápida.

A simbiose do iPad Air 2 e iPad Pro 12,9 tem bastante sucesso, mas também é muito cara.

Em compensação você recebe desempenho rápido e bons alto falantes. No entanto, o modelo de gama baixa não será suficiente se planeja usar o aparelho para multimídia, embora o acréscimo para a maior capacidade de armazenamento seja bastante cara, com 180 Euros. Similar ao maior Pro, a Apple oferece um aparelho poderoso, mas não é um substituto de portátil, em nossa opinião; existem limitações demais e a usabilidade como um aparelho de trabalho com frequência é afetada pela tela pequena. O Pro 12.9 é muito mais apto para cenários de uso profissional.

O iPad Pro 9.7 é um tablet para usuários que não desejam fazer compromisso algum. Este é normalmente o caso para o desempenho ou as câmeras, mas não para o Pro 9.7. No entanto, se você estiver procurando um tablet multimídia puro, ficará completamente satisfeito com o Air 2 oou você poderia economizar muito dinheiro com o MediaPad M2. Os usuários profissionais estarão melhor com o iPad Pro 12.9 ou o Surface Pro 4. O Pixel C é outras alternativas interessantes.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Apple iPad Pro 9.7 - 04/18/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
76 / 80 → 95%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
43 / 65 → 67%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 92%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
66 / 68 → 97%
Desempenho da aplicação
71 / 76 → 94%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
76 / 85 → 90%
Impressão
-1%
Médio
75%
91%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 9.7
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-04-19 (Update: 2016-04-29)