Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/04/2017

Big Player. O Apple iPad Pro 12.9 foi atualizado não apenas com um SoC mais veloz, mas também com câmera e tela melhoradas. Não encontramos muito para criticar, mas o gigante entre seus irmãos ainda não é um completo substituto para um portátil.

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (iPad Pro Serie)
Processador
Apple A10X Fusion
Placa gráfica
Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4, 1600 MHz
Pantalha
12.9 polegadas 4:3, 2732x2048 pixel 265 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , 64 GB 
, 51.24 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Touch ID, sensor de 3-direções giroscópico e de aceleração, barômetro, bússola digital, Smart Connector
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.9 x 305.7 x 220.6
Bateria
41 Wh, 10875 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3.77 V, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, OIS, Auto-HDR, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, Auto-HDR, 1080p video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes, Teclado: virtual, Cabo Lightning, carregador modular, guia de início rápido, panfletos de segurança e garantia, 12 Meses Garantia, Porta Lightning, fanless
peso
677 g, Suprimento de energia: 99 g
Preço
899 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
577 MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
530 MBit/s ∼86%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s ∼41% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
618 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼92% +11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
514 MBit/s ∼83%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼40% -52%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) with enabled (left) and disabled (right) TrueTone
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) with enabled (left) and disabled (right) TrueTone
603
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 650 cd/m² Médio: 614.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 650 cd/m²
Contraste: 1548:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQ
IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Screen
-44%
-28%
-23%
-143%
-54%
-187%
Brightness
614
393
-36%
625
2%
468
-24%
443
-28%
401
-35%
367
-40%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
87
-3%
82
-9%
86
-4%
88
-2%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.22
48%
0.39
7%
0.43
-2%
0.29
31%
0.56
-33%
Contrast
1548
1814
17%
1626
5%
1137
-27%
1438
-7%
698
-55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
2.96
-196%
1.9
-90%
1.8
-80%
5.5
-450%
3.63
-263%
6.96
-596%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
3
-100%
2.8
-87%
1.2
20%
6.7
-347%
2.18
-45%
7.44
-396%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
2.26 106%
2.11 114%
2.06 117%
3.09 78%
2.41 100%
CCT
6734 97%
7049 92%
7027 93%
6500 100%
7457 87%
6767 96%
8126 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71.15
82.32
63
53
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.87
99.06
99
83

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8581 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
227987 Points ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
217439 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points ∼81% -19%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points ∼63% -37%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
74177 Points ∼33% -67%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
29823 Points ∼13% -87%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
9358 Points ∼37% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
9293 Points ∼37%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼26% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points ∼17% -55%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3933 Points ∼66% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
3924 Points ∼66%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points ∼29% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
HTC U11
3085 Points ∼100% +18%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
2610 Points ∼84%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2036 Points ∼66% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1754 Points ∼57% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
6993 Points ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
5459 Points ∼78% -22%
HTC U11
3324 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3196 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
5093 Points ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3975 Points ∼78% -22%
HTC U11
3268 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2702 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼92% +43%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
2054 Points ∼67% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2027 Points ∼66% +2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
1988 Points ∼65%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1878 Points ∼61% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1798 Points ∼58% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5384 Points ∼100% +15%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
4695 Points ∼87%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4537 Points ∼84% -3%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2943 Points ∼55% -37%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
763 Points ∼14% -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3806 Points ∼98% +6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
3605 Points ∼93%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3558 Points ∼92% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2578 Points ∼66% -28%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
887 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼92% +44%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
1960 Points ∼64% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
1960 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1955 Points ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1811 Points ∼59% -8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1555 Points ∼50% -21%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1040 Points ∼34% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
7525 Points ∼97% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
7434 Points ∼96%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
7212 Points ∼93% -3%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4626 Points ∼60% -38%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
970 Points ∼13% -87%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
81 Points ∼1% -99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
4588 Points ∼92%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4521 Points ∼91% -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
4061 Points ∼82% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3438 Points ∼69% -25%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1092 Points ∼22% -76%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
102 Points ∼2% -98%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
21886 Points ∼30% +12%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
19567 Points ∼27%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
19534 Points ∼27% 0%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
16449 Points ∼23% -16%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
15473 Points ∼21% -21%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7964 Points ∼11% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
110971 Points ∼24%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
110148 Points ∼24% -1%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% -50%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
51124 Points ∼11% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34002 Points ∼7% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14121 Points ∼3% -87%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7737 Points ∼2% -93%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
54449 Points ∼28%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
54237 Points ∼28% 0%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% -27%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33812 Points ∼17% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
30277 Points ∼15% -44%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9548 Points ∼5% -82%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7786 Points ∼4% -86%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
225 fps ∼16% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
224 fps ∼16%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
163.2 fps ∼12% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps ∼7% -59%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -59%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
29 fps ∼2% -87%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14 fps ∼1% -94%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
59.3 fps ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
59 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
59 fps ∼13%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
23 fps ∼5% -61%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
13 fps ∼3% -78%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
110 fps ∼20%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
109 fps ∼20% -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps ∼15% -27%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps ∼9% -56%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14 fps ∼3% -87%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.6 fps ∼1% -95%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
58 fps ∼16% +26%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
46 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps ∼9% -26%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps ∼9% -28%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -37%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9.7 fps ∼3% -79%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.2 fps ∼1% -89%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
83 fps ∼20% +9%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
76 fps ∼18%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
63 fps ∼15% -17%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps ∼8% -58%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
54.3 fps ∼31% +101%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
43 fps ∼24% +59%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
27 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼11% -30%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -44%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼5%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps ∼0%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1086 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points ∼59%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
9 Points ∼1%
Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points ∼91%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points ∼53%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1185 Points ∼13%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
729 Points ∼8%
Memory
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points ∼44%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1887 Points ∼43%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
750 Points ∼17%
System
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points ∼61%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points ∼34%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3071 Points ∼30%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1250 Points ∼12%
Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points ∼87%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1652 Points ∼44%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
283 Points ∼7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
31188 Points ∼63%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
30333 Points ∼61% -3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
19852 Points ∼40% -36%
HTC U11
11781 Points ∼24% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
9531 Points ∼19% -69%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3596 Points ∼7% -88%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
2672 Points ∼5% -91%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
257 Points ∼34% +5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
244 Points ∼32%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
215 Points ∼29% -12%
HTC U11
162 Points ∼22% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
132 Points ∼18% -46%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
98 Points ∼13% -60%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
56 Points ∼7% -77%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
202.1 Points ∼0%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
200.59 Points ∼0% -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
142 Points ∼0% -30%
HTC U11
69.51 Points ∼0% -66%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
57.4 Points ∼0% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
42.73 Points ∼0% -79%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
18 Points ∼0% -91%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14064 ms * ∼24% -1352%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3001 ms * ∼5% -210%
HTC U11
2760.3 ms * ∼5% -185%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2244.4 ms * ∼4% -132%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1498.8 ms * ∼3% -55%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
972.7 ms * ∼2% -0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
968.8 ms * ∼2%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
 
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
 
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 33.7 °C33 °C34.4 °C 
 35.6 °C35.6 °C34.8 °C 
 36.9 °C35.4 °C37.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
31.5 °C32.9 °C33.3 °C
33.2 °C34.6 °C35 °C
33.2 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  57.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.22525.430.63125.3314032.931.55033.634.26331.634.68028.437.41002750.112520.858.31602261.320021.367.525020.868.531521.267.840019.465.550019.565.263017.767.380017.967.5100017.865.2125017.372.6160017.467.5200016.768.1250017.268.7315018.272.5400017.970.6500017.667630017.761800017.858.21000017.9601250018.167.61600018.267.5SPL3081.2N1.351.3median 17.9Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017median 67.5Delta1.33.131.639.825.430.725.330.632.933.533.632.231.630.328.425.92726.620.826.82236.221.346.320.861.321.27219.475.319.573.817.780.817.980.517.879.217.373.417.474.116.77217.268.518.267.717.970.717.672.817.76917.873.517.970.318.167.718.264.43086.51.371median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825median 70.71.38.336353637.428.237.435.825.435.83729.83737.928.537.940.728.940.740.429.140.440.928.940.943.528.443.545274548.723.848.75022.75056.721.956.758.320.958.358.120.558.162.219.562.264.918.464.960.818.260.860.917.860.961.21861.267.817.867.865.217.865.260.317.960.35817.95855.81855.856.71856.757.117.957.156.117.856.145.117.745.142.517.842.57430.77432.31.532.3median 57.1Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5median 18median 57.15.92.15.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.55 / 8.58 / 8.59 Watt
Carga midlight 10.09 / 10.61 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
10307 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 LTE (SM-P905)
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Power Consumption
-33%
-23%
16%
17%
29%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.55
2.69
-74%
3.1
-100%
1.44
7%
1.59
-3%
2.08
-34%
2.19
-41%
Idle Average *
8.58
10.95
-28%
8.9
-4%
6.12
29%
4.14
52%
3.5
59%
4.3
50%
Idle Maximum *
8.59
11.14
-30%
9.4
-9%
6.14
29%
4.23
51%
3.58
58%
4.37
49%
Load Average *
10.09
11.54
-14%
9.8
3%
8.55
15%
10.89
-8%
6.97
31%
8.62
15%
Load Maximum *
10.61
12.8
-21%
11
-4%
10.62
-0%
11.58
-9%
7.4
30%
11.26
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
48h 39min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 17min
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
10307 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-17%
-1%
-26%
-15%
-29%
Reader / Idle
2919
1933
-34%
2036
-30%
1903
-35%
1453
-50%
1985
-32%
1230
-58%
H.264
676
630
-7%
629
-7%
551
-18%
600
-11%
702
4%
593
-12%
WiFi v1.3
736
695
-6%
693
-6%
760
3%
518
-30%
602
-18%
416
-43%
Load
257
195
-24%
199
-23%
375
46%
225
-12%
222
-14%
248
-4%

Pro

+ Ótima tela
+ Acabamento de alta qualidade
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Wi-Fi veloz de longo alcance
+ CPU veloz
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem suporte para Galileo-GNSS
- Carcaça sensível á pressão
- Apenas um ano de garantia
- Apesar das afirmações em contrário, a tela não suporta P3
- Armazenamento mais lento que o do antecessor
- Longo tempo de carga
- Sem carga rápida
In review: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)
In review: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)

No papel, o iPad Pro 12.9 não é mais que um iPad Pro 10.5 maior, mas na vida real é bastante diferente em muitos aspectos. A tela bem calibrada com sua excepcional precisão de cores, em particular, foi muito impressionante; os alto-falantes estão bem equilibrados; o alcance do modem Wi-Fi é maior; e a bateria dura mais tempo.

Assim, ele se resume às preferências e ao gosto pessoal. O trabalho criativo, a edição de fotos e a exibição de filmes são muito mais divertidos no modelo de 12,9 polegadas.  A portabilidade, uma melhor ergonomia e um desempenho de jogos mais alto são as vantagens do modelo de 10,5 polegadas.

O iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) não é apenas maior, mas também oferece uma incrível tela de 120 Hz, desempenho impressionante e maior duração da bateria. Além disso, você também obtém uma excelente câmera e alto-falantes muito bons.

No entanto, não consideraríamos o iPad Pro 12.9 como um substituto para um portátil. O iOS ainda é muito limitado, o Safari Mobile tem problemas com sites complexos e sistemas CMS e o teclado inteligente opcional é inutilizável se nçao estiver sobre uma superfície lisa e sólida.

O desempenho do iPad, por outro lado, é mais do que suficiente para tudo o que conseguimos lançar sobre ele. Mesmo as fotos RAW e a edição de vídeo UHD não foram problema algum. Em nossa opinião, a opção de armazenamento de 256 GB oferece o maior valor pelo seu dinheiro. Para conteúdo multimídia, principalmente de consumo, o modelo menor de 64 GB será suficiente, e apesar do seu alto padrão, o modelo de 512 GB certamente encontrará seus fãs entre os entusiastas.

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 - 06/26/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
77 / 80 → 96%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
45 / 65 → 69%
Peso
80 / 88 → 84%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
93%
Desempenho do jogos
72 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 76 → 100%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
81 / 85 → 95%
Médio
83%
92%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-07- 4 (Update: 2017-07- 6)