Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab M10

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/29/2019

A budget all-rounder. O Lenovo Tab M10 é um tablet de orçamento que é divertido para toda a família. O tablet inclui recursos para crianças e oferece uma folha de especificações bem completa para seu preço. No entanto, a alternativa mais barata para o Tab P10 tem seu trabalho cortado para reivindicar um mercado de tablets saturado e competitivo.

Lenovo Tab M10
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
10.1 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 7.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Lenovo Smart Dock connector
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, SAR: Body - 1.25 W/kg, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 242 x 168
Bateria
4850 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix Autofocus
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, suporte para Dolby Atmos, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, carregador modular (5 V/2 A), ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
480 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼92% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼87% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼82% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
214 (min: 206, max: 223) MBit/s ∼82% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 98, max: 220) MBit/s ∼79%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
197 (min: 191, max: 201) MBit/s ∼75% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (min: 314, max: 338) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼96% +10%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
284 (min: 246, max: 313) MBit/s ∼87%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
248 (min: 114, max: 278) MBit/s ∼76% -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼74% -15%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
239 MBit/s ∼73% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼70% -20%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø206 (98-220)
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø214 (206-223)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø216 (49-250)
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø284 (246-313)
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (314-338)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (291-325)
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Overview
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Overview
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Lake
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Lake
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Loop
GPS test: Lenovo Tab M10 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
299
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 346 cd/m² Médio: 326.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.56 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 339 cd/m²
Contraste: 807:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab P10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Screen
-4%
25%
10%
22%
17%
50%
Brightness middle
339
340
0%
426
26%
308
-9%
356
5%
522
54%
556
64%
Brightness
327
320
-2%
399
22%
297
-9%
340
4%
495
51%
514
57%
Brightness Distribution
86
84
-2%
91
6%
92
7%
92
7%
84
-2%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.19
55%
0.38
10%
0.29
31%
0.5
-19%
0.41
2%
0.42
-0%
Contrast
807
1789
122%
1121
39%
1062
32%
712
-12%
1273
58%
1324
64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
15
-159%
4.5
22%
6.2
-7%
2.3
60%
6.7
-16%
1.8
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.6
22.8
-97%
7.9
32%
10.5
9%
6.5
44%
12.2
-5%
3.2
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
4
53%
5.2
40%
6.6
23%
1.4
84%
9.1
-6%
2.2
74%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.09 105%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.16 102%
2.14 103%
2.26 97%
CCT
8718 75%
6940 94%
6875 95%
8216 79%
6565 99%
9417 69%
6819 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9318 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
77.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 39.6 ms rise
↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=28)
7163 Points ∼16%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3685 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Tab P10
3261 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=7)
3137 Points ∼7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3077 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=43)
4686 Points ∼13% +20%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4636 Points ∼13% +19%
Lenovo Tab M10
3897 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼11% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=10)
3835 Points ∼11% -2%
Lenovo Tab P10
3705 Points ∼10% -5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3316 Points ∼9% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1641 Points ∼26% +112%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=43)
1629 Points ∼26% +110%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% +99%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +56%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
885 Points ∼14% +14%
Lenovo Tab M10
774 Points ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=10)
760 Points ∼12% -2%
Lenovo Tab P10
747 Points ∼12% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +14%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
4615 Points ∼45% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=10)
4478 Points ∼43% +6%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=31)
4280 Points ∼42% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
4250 Points ∼41% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼40% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4077 Points ∼40% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -13%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼43% +21%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5798 Points ∼43% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 5656, n=10)
5188 Points ∼38% +7%
Lenovo Tab P10
4949 Points ∼37% +2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4922 Points ∼36% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼36% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼36% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
4836 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 8356, n=73)
4566 Points ∼34% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1804 Points ∼41% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼40% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1768 Points ∼40% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1529 - 1823, n=10)
1768 Points ∼40% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1635 Points ∼37% -8%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 2919, n=35)
1620 Points ∼36% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼31% -22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
650 Points ∼15% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=35)
1562 Points ∼19% +278%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
972 Points ∼12% +135%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% +28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
506 Points ∼6% +23%
Lenovo Tab P10
414 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
413 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (411 - 415, n=10)
413 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
399 Points ∼5% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5093, n=36)
1325 Points ∼25% +166%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1083 Points ∼21% +117%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼12% +23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
532 Points ∼10% +7%
Lenovo Tab P10
499 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
498 Points ∼10% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (491 - 501, n=10)
498 Points ∼10% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
480 Points ∼9% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1871 Points ∼40% +5%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼38% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1580 - 1816, n=10)
1767 Points ∼38% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1766 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=40)
1611 Points ∼34% -10%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1473 Points ∼31% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% -21%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
744 Points ∼16% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=40)
2879 Points ∼10% +304%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1133 Points ∼4% +59%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
812 Points ∼3% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (709 - 718, n=10)
713 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
712 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P10
711 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
611 Points ∼2% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=40)
1925 Points ∼14% +134%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1242 Points ∼9% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% +2%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (808 - 828, n=10)
822 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
821 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
821 Points ∼6% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
796 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
702 Points ∼5% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab P10
1832 Points ∼43% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=10)
1796 Points ∼43% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼42% -2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1746 Points ∼41% -4%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1654 Points ∼39% -9%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=54)
1465 Points ∼35% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -25%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=54)
1116 Points ∼21% +207%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
626 Points ∼12% +72%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=10)
365 Points ∼7% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
364 Points ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
140 Points ∼3% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=59)
998 Points ∼21% +126%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
726 Points ∼15% +64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=10)
444 Points ∼9% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
443 Points ∼9% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼9% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
176 Points ∼4% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Tab P10
1814 Points ∼43% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼43% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=10)
1783 Points ∼42% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1714 Points ∼41% -6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1586 Points ∼38% -13%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=56)
1397 Points ∼33% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -26%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=56)
1545 Points ∼19% +123%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
890 Points ∼11% +28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=10)
700 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼8% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Tab P10
691 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% -14%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
100 Points ∼1% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=60)
1245 Points ∼19% +55%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
996 Points ∼15% +24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=10)
809 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼12% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab P10
801 Points ∼12% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% -15%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
126 Points ∼2% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼16% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
14108 Points ∼16% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=9)
14089 Points ∼16% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 39393, n=142)
12971 Points ∼15% -8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
12893 Points ∼15% -8%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11203 Points ∼13% -20%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼11% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=142)
17765 Points ∼3% +43%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
15682 Points ∼3% +27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12323 - 12550, n=9)
12439 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
12400 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2% -1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10466 Points ∼2% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 103813, n=143)
14739 Points ∼6% +16%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
14402 Points ∼6% +13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12604 - 12878, n=9)
12751 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
12743 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼5% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -12%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10923 Points ∼5% -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
39 fps ∼0% +77%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=169)
29.6 fps ∼0% +35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0% -5%
Lenovo Tab P10
21 fps ∼0% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=10)
19.4 fps ∼0% -12%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼0% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -18%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
25 fps ∼1% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=10)
23.4 fps ∼1% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +5%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=173)
20.4 fps ∼1% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
20 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼1% -5%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=107)
19.6 fps ∼0% +113%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
19 fps ∼0% +107%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼0% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
9.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% -8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=10)
8.35 fps ∼0% -9%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=110)
14.1 fps ∼0% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=10)
11.4 fps ∼0% +30%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11 fps ∼0% +25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼0% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab P10
8.7 fps ∼0% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼0% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=57)
20.1 fps ∼0% +235%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
13 fps ∼0% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0% +2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
6 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=10)
5.45 fps ∼0% -9%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5.1 fps ∼0% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -18%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=57)
12.5 fps ∼0% +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=10)
7.87 fps ∼0% +38%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼0% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5 fps ∼0% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -18%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=10)
12.4 fps ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.9 - 3.6, n=2)
2.75 fps ∼5%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.9 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1.7 fps ∼3%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1 - 51.1, n=10)
14.2 fps ∼28%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.5 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.1 - 1.2, n=2)
1.15 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.1 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1 fps ∼2%
Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=10)
17.5 fps ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.2 - 6, n=2)
4.6 fps ∼8%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3.8 fps ∼6%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.2 fps ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.7 fps ∼5%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.8 - 134, n=10)
38.2 fps ∼28%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.4 - 3.4, n=2)
3.4 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.8 fps ∼2%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.4 - 107, n=37)
13.6 fps ∼0% +300%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼0% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.4 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3.1 fps ∼0% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=10)
3.08 fps ∼0% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -41%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 47, n=37)
7.7 fps ∼0% +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=10)
4.37 fps ∼0% +32%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4 fps ∼0% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.3 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.3 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% -6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.9 fps ∼0% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -39%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% +36%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=61)
70841 Points ∼28% +22%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
67359 Points ∼26% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10
59916 Points ∼24% +3%
Lenovo Tab M10
58122 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=9)
57722 Points ∼23% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
55314 Points ∼22% -5%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=22)
153113 Points ∼27% +116%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
110854 Points ∼20% +56%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
87335 Points ∼15% +23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10
71739 Points ∼13% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
70878 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 71739, n=10)
69509 Points ∼12% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +37%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
818 Points ∼40% +11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼39% +9%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
789 Points ∼39% +7%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=101)
743 Points ∼37% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Tab P10
734 Points ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 814, n=10)
596 Points ∼29% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=101)
2066 Points ∼7% +118%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1967 Points ∼7% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 975, n=10)
960 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
951 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
943 Points ∼3% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
844 Points ∼3% -11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -26%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1960 Points ∼31% +132%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% +79%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=101)
1040 Points ∼17% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
969 Points ∼15% +15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=10)
963 Points ∼15% +14%
Lenovo Tab P10
853 Points ∼14% +1%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
849 Points ∼14% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points ∼13%
System
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3318 Points ∼20% +17%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3133 Points ∼19% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10
2861 Points ∼17% +1%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points ∼17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=10)
2747 Points ∼17% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
2561 Points ∼16% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -18%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=101)
2281 Points ∼14% -20%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -31%
Overall
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1446 Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1435 Points ∼17% +26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% +15%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=101)
1217 Points ∼14% +7%
Lenovo Tab P10
1142 Points ∼14% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points ∼13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1221, n=10)
1005 Points ∼12% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
389 Points ∼5% -66%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=76)
53.9 Points ∼100% +143%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼88% +113%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼86% +109%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70)
29.934 Points ∼56% +35%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
29.467 Points ∼55% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=10)
22.3 Points ∼41% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
22.275 Points ∼41% 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.219 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
22.084 Points ∼41% -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +123%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +115%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=160)
6337 Points ∼71% +59%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)
6017 Points ∼68% +51%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
5471 Points ∼61% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
4078 Points ∼46% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
4075 Points ∼46% +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4078, n=10)
3957 Points ∼44% -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
11529.2 ms * ∼100% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11352 - 11863, n=10)
11515 ms * ∼100% -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11447.7 ms * ∼99%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
11352 ms * ∼98% +1%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=171)
9335 ms * ∼81% +18%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
9293.1 ms * ∼81% +19%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)
7059 ms * ∼61% +38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼34% +65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼33% +67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (24 - 182, n=14)
70.6 Points ∼100% +108%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
40 Points ∼57% +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
34 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
33 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (31 - 34, n=4)
32.5 Points ∼46% -4%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
113 Points ∼82% +12%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=73)
109 Points ∼80% +8%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
103 Points ∼75% +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
101 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
99 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=6)
96 Points ∼70% -5%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Tab M10Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Chuwi Hi9 PlusHuawei MediaPad T5 10Lenovo Tab P10Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
4%
-7%
118%
56%
25%
-38%
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-51%
20.44
-67%
72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
37.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=116)
-38%
43.9 (14.6 - 73.8, n=46)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
21.16
-75%
83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
57 (10.8 - 87.7, n=116)
-32%
61.6 (21.2 - 87.7, n=46)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
11.32
8.77
-23%
9.37
-17%
13.01
15%
76.12
572%
15.75
39%
13.39
18%
7.67 (0.49 - 43.2, n=231)
-32%
5.66 (0.13 - 77.9, n=196)
-50%
Random Read 4KB
52.5
13.7
-74%
27.72
-47%
42.2
-20%
76.67
46%
53.9
3%
71.13
35%
20.5 (2.49 - 61.7, n=231)
-61%
18 (1.32 - 142, n=196)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
52.6
92.38
76%
147.67
181%
132.47
152%
83.84
59%
205.74
291%
103.32
96%
41.6 (8.74 - 97.6, n=231)
-21%
36.5 (2.04 - 208, n=196)
-31%
Sequential Read 256KB
279.94
173.7
-38%
262.2
-6%
144.97
-48%
312.17
12%
276.7
-1%
285.63
2%
160 (9.66 - 294, n=231)
-43%
107 (6.75 - 741, n=196)
-62%
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.3: Ø56 (32-60)
Asphalt 9: Legends (Graphics: High)
010203040Tooltip
; 1.2.4a: Ø21.4 (1-31)
Asphalt 9: Legends (Graphics: Normal)
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.2.4a: Ø25.8 (1-60)
Carga Máxima
 31.6 °C28 °C26.9 °C 
 31.8 °C25.8 °C25.3 °C 
 30.2 °C26.1 °C24.8 °C 
Máximo: 31.8 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C
26.6 °C28.3 °C29.4 °C
25.3 °C26 °C28.2 °C
24.1 °C25.9 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 29.4 °C
Médio: 26.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204050.72528.143.33124.634.34023.429.75035.739.46326.129.58025.931.21002533.512521.135.41601745.320016.143.325013.549.331516.255.740014.957.350014.759.763014.266.780014.369.2100013.372.1125014.170.3160013.971.7200013.675.8250014.476.4315014.273.9400014.777.5500014.181.3630014.378.8800014.578.31000014.8781250015.370.91600015.451.7SPL26.488N0.870.1median 14.5median 70.3Delta0.812.331.135.229.227.32623.923.224.831.931.827.421.92927.224.230.318.438.81850.217.449.314.455.815.858.716.360.715.463.314.770.716.275.414.77813.873.91472.214.474.214.171.614.672.614.675.814.480.314.480.414.873.415.271.914.76914.850.526.987.60.972.6median 14.7median 71.61.49.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M10Lenovo Tab P10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.25 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.98 / 4.45 / 4.51 Watt
Carga midlight 5.78 / 7.18 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-81%
-21%
-57%
-96%
4%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
3.21
-228%
1.55
-58%
2.18
-122%
2.33
-138%
1.01
-3%
1.26
-29%
Idle Average *
4.45
5.97
-34%
4.17
6%
5.29
-19%
8.46
-90%
4.16
7%
4.22
5%
Idle Maximum *
4.51
6.19
-37%
4.25
6%
5.37
-19%
8.49
-88%
4.17
8%
4.29
5%
Load Average *
5.78
9.72
-68%
7.13
-23%
8.56
-48%
11.14
-93%
5.45
6%
5.48
5%
Load Maximum *
7.18
9.97
-39%
9.63
-34%
12.86
-79%
12.3
-71%
6.9
4%
6.57
8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 56min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 00min
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-34%
-5%
-19%
37%
37%
59%
Reader / Idle
1290
735
-43%
960
-26%
1241
-4%
3329
158%
1315
2%
1960
52%
H.264
596
585
-2%
580
-3%
910
53%
963
62%
WiFi v1.3
580
387
-33%
542
-7%
634
9%
525
-9%
992
71%
938
62%
Load
240
175
-27%
274
14%
93
-61%
241
0%
289
20%
385
60%

Pro

+ Para a família
+ Design leve e fino
+ Porta USB Tipo C
+ Lenovo Smart Dock opcional com integração do Amazon Alexa
+ Android 8.1 Oreo
+ Módulo GPS preciso
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Formato 16:10 ideal para assistir filmes
+ As temperaturas da superfície permanecem baixas mesmo sob uso intenso contínuo
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo

Contra

- Nossa unidade de teste tem apenas 2 GB de RAM e 16 GB de armazenamento
- Sem leitor de digitais
- Sem LTE
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas do Android
- Câmeras pobres
- Tala abaixo do esperado
- Sem sensor de luz ambiente
- Apenas poderoso o suficiente para jogos simples e antigos
- Velocidades de gravação comparativamente lentas
- Bateria pequena
The Lenovo Tab M10 tablet review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Lenovo Tab M10 tablet review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Lenovo Tab M10 é um tablet de gama média decente. O tablet é acessível e possui recursos amigáveis para crianças, o que deve atrair algumas pessoas a comprá-lo. Seu SoC Snapdragon 450 é poderoso o suficiente para a maioria das tarefas, enquanto seus alto-falantes estéreo são melhores que os da maioria.

O Lenovo Smart Dock também é uma adição útil, desde que você o compre junto com o Tab M10 em sua região, pois atualmente não é possível comprá-lo separadamente. A funcionalidade do Amazon Alexa permite que o tablet funcione como um alto-falante quase inteligente, o que dá ao utilitário Tab M10 uma utilidade adicional.

O Lenovo Tab M10 é um tablet para toda a família que está a partir de £179,99 (~$237). No entanto, seu preço acessível também vem com compromissos como sua tela escura e a duração da bateria decepcionante. 

No entanto, o Tab M10 também tem seus problemas. O modelo básico está equipado com 2 GB de RAM e 16 GB de armazenamento. Além disso, suas câmeras são terríveis, e tem uma duração de bateria decepcionante em comparação com o Tab P10. Além disso, sua tela é muito escura para nosso gosto, e é uma pena que a Lenovo não tenha incluído nenhum perfil de cores ou opções de balanço de branco que possam retificar a alta temperatura de cor da tela.

Embora o Tab M10 recebe uma recomendação nossa, sugerimos considerar o Tab P10 sobre seu irmão mais barato. O Tab P10 custa cerca de $100 a mais do que o Tab M10, mas você obtém mais RAM, armazenamento adicional, o dobro de alto-falantes e uma tela mais brilhante com uma bateria muito maior. Além disso, o Tab P10 tem um sensor de digitai, melhores câmeras e um design mais elegante do que o Tab M10. Ele também tem um sensor de luz ambiente que o Tab M10 estranhamente não tem. Em suma, o Tab P10 vale o custo extra se puder esticar o seu orçamento.

Lenovo Tab M10 - 01/25/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
72 / 80 → 90%
Mouse
79%
Conectividade
34 / 65 → 52%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
26 / 68 → 39%
Desempenho da aplicação
46 / 76 → 61%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
40 / 85 → 48%
Médio
69%
80%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab M10
Manuel Masiero, 2019-01-29 (Update: 2019-01-30)