Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/01/2019

Rejuvenescimento - Já faz mais de dois anos que a Samsung atualizou seu tablet Galaxy Tab A de 10 polegadas. Uma atualização foi necessária, especialmente em relação ao software. Leia mais para descobrir como o Galaxy Tab A 10.1 se desempenha em nossos testes e se é uma atualização que vale a pena sobre o Galaxy Tab A 10.5.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Galaxy Tab A Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7904
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
10.1 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, Tela táctil multi-touch capacitiva, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB - com suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 245.2 x 149.4
Bateria
6150 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (CMOS, f/1.9, 1/4.0", autofocus, Full HD video)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (CMOS, f/2.2, 1/5.0", fixed focus, Full HD video)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, One UI 1.1, Microsoft Office, OneDrive, Galaxy Apps, Spotify, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
460 g
Preço
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g260 mm 161.1 mm 8 mm 531 g254.2 mm 155.3 mm 8.2 mm 525 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g242 mm 168 mm 8.1 mm 480 g240 mm 169.5 mm 7.5 mm 469 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
570 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
298 (min: 239, max: 314) MBit/s ∼52%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼38% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼9% -83%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
500 MBit/s ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼62% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 (min: 274, max: 309) MBit/s ∼58%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼45% -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼11% -81%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (239-314)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (274-309)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart taken in the dark
404
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 428 cd/m² Médio: 395.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.06 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 802:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Apple iPad 6 2018
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Screen
-5%
-5%
-37%
-41%
35%
25%
29%
Brightness middle
401
542
35%
426
6%
514
28%
339
-15%
556
39%
452
13%
530
32%
Brightness
396
520
31%
399
1%
492
24%
327
-17%
514
30%
453
14%
513
30%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
91
6%
80
-7%
86
0%
87
1%
90
5%
92
7%
Black Level *
0.5
0.68
-36%
0.38
24%
0.96
-92%
0.42
16%
0.42
16%
0.61
-22%
Contrast
802
797
-1%
1121
40%
535
-33%
807
1%
1324
65%
869
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.9
4.2
-45%
4.5
-55%
5.42
-87%
5.8
-100%
1.8
38%
1.7
41%
1.2
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.8
6.7
-16%
7.9
-36%
9.84
-70%
11.6
-100%
3.2
45%
3.7
36%
3.2
45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
4.8
-17%
5.2
-27%
6.5
-59%
8.6
-110%
2.2
46%
2.4
41%
1
76%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.42 91%
2.23 99%
2.216 99%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.28 96%
CCT
7263 89%
7434 87%
6875 95%
6780 96%
8718 75%
6819 95%
6337 103%
6588 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9457 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
5952 Points ∼14% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5742 Points ∼13% +43%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=55)
4639 Points ∼11% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4017 - 4105, n=3)
4073 Points ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4017 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Tab M10
3897 Points ∼9% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼9% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼9% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼8% -18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
3499 Points ∼55% +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1712 Points ∼27% +35%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=55)
1653 Points ∼26% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1268 - 1329, n=3)
1306 Points ∼21% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1268 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼15% -26%
Lenovo Tab M10
774 Points ∼12% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12% -41%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5626 Points ∼15% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4169 Points ∼11% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3799 Points ∼10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904
3799 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1838 - 5734, n=25)
3550 Points ∼9% -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1772 Points ∼36% +40%
Average of class Tablet (616 - 3200, n=25)
1308 Points ∼27% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1263 Points ∼26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904
1263 Points ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
753 Points ∼15% -40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6698 Points ∼56% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5452 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5269 - 5452, n=3)
5338 Points ∼45% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼39% -13%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6698, n=39)
4281 Points ∼36% -21%
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points ∼35% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼35% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼31% -33%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8126 Points ∼41% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6456 Points ∼33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5802 - 6923, n=3)
6394 Points ∼33% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼25% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼25% -24%
Lenovo Tab M10
4836 Points ∼25% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4796 Points ∼24% -26%
Average of class Tablet (4342 - 8356, n=80)
4594 Points ∼23% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2288 Points ∼15% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2053 Points ∼13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2028 - 2061, n=3)
2047 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 2288, n=5)
868 Points ∼6% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1408 Points ∼10% +130%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (604 - 964, n=3)
727 Points ∼5% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
612 Points ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1408, n=5)
404 Points ∼3% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1540 Points ∼10% +112%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (717 - 1091, n=3)
844 Points ∼6% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
725 Points ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1540, n=5)
453 Points ∼3% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2424 Points ∼53% +38%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points ∼39% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1768 Points ∼39% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1755 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1709 Points ∼38% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1657 - 1755, n=3)
1701 Points ∼38% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1632 Points ∼36% -7%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1627 Points ∼36% -7%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3347, n=43)
1600 Points ∼35% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼31% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
3852 Points ∼47% +604%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 6993, n=43)
1631 Points ∼20% +198%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1612 Points ∼20% +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
547 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (488 - 549, n=3)
528 Points ∼6% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
413 Points ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points ∼5% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
399 Points ∼5% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
247 Points ∼3% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad 6 2018
2955 Points ∼47% +357%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1742 Points ∼28% +170%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5367, n=44)
1397 Points ∼22% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
646 Points ∼10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (579 - 646, n=3)
624 Points ∼10% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼10% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
498 Points ∼8% -23%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points ∼8% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
480 Points ∼8% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
305 Points ∼5% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2413 Points ∼51% +41%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points ∼38% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1766 Points ∼38% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1740 Points ∼37% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1716 Points ∼36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1677 - 1716, n=3)
1701 Points ∼36% -1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1690 Points ∼36% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1648 Points ∼35% -4%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=48)
1643 Points ∼35% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
7253 Points ∼25% +782%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=48)
3099 Points ∼11% +277%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2534 Points ∼9% +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
822 Points ∼3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (650 - 823, n=3)
765 Points ∼3% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
712 Points ∼2% -13%
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points ∼2% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
602 Points ∼2% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
402 Points ∼1% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad 6 2018
4190 Points ∼31% +351%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2506 Points ∼19% +169%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=48)
2050 Points ∼15% +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
930 Points ∼7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (752 - 930, n=3)
871 Points ∼6% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -10%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points ∼6% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
821 Points ∼6% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
701 Points ∼5% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
485 Points ∼4% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2436 Points ∼56% +43%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points ∼42% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼41% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼40% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1704 Points ∼39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1657 - 1704, n=3)
1679 Points ∼39% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1646 Points ∼38% -3%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3312, n=62)
1474 Points ∼34% -13%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1439 Points ∼33% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
3682 Points ∼58% +579%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1451 Points ∼23% +168%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5760, n=62)
1193 Points ∼19% +120%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
542 Points ∼9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (488 - 542, n=3)
523 Points ∼8% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼6% -33%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points ∼6% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
235 Points ∼4% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼3% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 6 2018
2735 Points ∼48% +328%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1594 Points ∼28% +149%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 4949, n=68)
1052 Points ∼18% +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
639 Points ∼11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (582 - 639, n=3)
619 Points ∼11% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼9% -23%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points ∼8% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼8% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
290 Points ∼5% -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼4% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2456 Points ∼55% +44%
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points ∼41% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼40% +6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼39% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1702 Points ∼38%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1677 - 1702, n=3)
1689 Points ∼38% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1657 Points ∼37% -3%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1535 Points ∼34% -10%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3184, n=64)
1443 Points ∼32% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼30% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6095 Points ∼57% +761%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2357 Points ∼22% +233%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=64)
1731 Points ∼16% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
708 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼7% -2%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points ∼7% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (650 - 708, n=3)
687 Points ∼6% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼6% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
388 Points ∼4% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018
3672 Points ∼47% +351%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2378 Points ∼30% +192%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=68)
1359 Points ∼17% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
814 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼10% -1%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points ∼10% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (752 - 814, n=3)
791 Points ∼10% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼9% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
468 Points ∼6% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼2% -85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad 6 2018
15499 Points ∼18% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼16% +9%
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points ∼16% +8%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=152)
13331 Points ∼15% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13055 Points ∼15% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
12994 Points ∼15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (12321 - 12994, n=3)
12605 Points ∼15% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12095 Points ∼14% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
62626 Points ∼12% +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
22381 Points ∼4% +62%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=152)
20201 Points ∼4% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13794 Points ∼3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (13392 - 13821, n=3)
13669 Points ∼3% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -7%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points ∼2% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6151 Points ∼1% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
37372 Points ∼16% +175%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19315 Points ∼8% +42%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=153)
15950 Points ∼7% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13608 Points ∼6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (13183 - 13608, n=3)
13416 Points ∼6% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -3%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points ∼5% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼5% -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6905 Points ∼3% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
125 fps ∼1% +400%
Apple iPad 6 2018
118 fps ∼1% +372%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
46 fps ∼0% +84%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=178)
32 fps ∼0% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
25 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -12%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps ∼0% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (14 - 25, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼0% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0% -16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12 fps ∼0% -52%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
59.7 fps ∼2% +149%
Apple iPad 6 2018
59 fps ∼2% +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
32 fps ∼1% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
24 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -12%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=182)
21 fps ∼1% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1% -17%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps ∼1% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (12 - 24, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼1% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
11 fps ∼0% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
62.6 fps ∼11% +382%
Apple iPad 6 2018
58.9 fps ∼11% +353%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
29 fps ∼5% +123%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=116)
21 fps ∼4% +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7 - 13, n=3)
11 fps ∼2% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼2% -29%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps ∼2% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼2% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.9 fps ∼1% -62%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.9 fps ∼11% +215%
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.3 fps ∼11% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
17 fps ∼5% +31%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=119)
14.7 fps ∼4% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼4%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.2 - 13, n=3)
10.4 fps ∼3% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼2% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps ∼2% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.5 fps ∼1% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
42.7 fps ∼1% +427%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=65)
19.9 fps ∼0% +146%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19 fps ∼0% +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.1 fps ∼0%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.3 - 8.1, n=3)
6.83 fps ∼0% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0% -25%
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps ∼0% -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.7 fps ∼0% -79%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
27.3 fps ∼1% +255%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=65)
12.5 fps ∼0% +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7.7 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.9 fps ∼0% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3.8 - 7.7, n=3)
6.3 fps ∼0% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0% -26%
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps ∼0% -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2.8 fps ∼0% -64%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
12.3 fps ∼8% +310%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 49, n=15)
10.5 fps ∼7% +250%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.3 fps ∼3% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3 fps ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.7 - 3, n=3)
2.87 fps ∼2% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.7 fps ∼1% -43%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 51.1, n=15)
11.7 fps ∼11% +550%
Apple iPad 6 2018
10.8 fps ∼10% +500%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.4 fps ∼4% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1.8 fps ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1.7 - 1.8, n=3)
1.767 fps ∼2% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.1 fps ∼1% -39%
Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
20 fps ∼10% +308%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 58, n=15)
15.1 fps ∼8% +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.8 fps ∼3% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4.9 fps ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.2 - 4.9, n=3)
4.47 fps ∼2% -9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.7 fps ∼1% -45%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 134, n=15)
31.3 fps ∼12% +526%
Apple iPad 6 2018
30.8 fps ∼12% +516%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12 fps ∼5% +140%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.7 - 5, n=3)
4.8 fps ∼2% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.8 fps ∼1% -44%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
26.8 fps ∼7% +415%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 107, n=44)
13.4 fps ∼3% +158%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8.5 fps ∼2% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5.2 fps ∼1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.6 - 5.2, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼1% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼1% -35%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.4 fps ∼1% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼1% -38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.8 fps ∼0% -65%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
17.9 fps ∼11% +258%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 47, n=44)
7.71 fps ∼5% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.4 fps ∼4% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (2.7 - 5, n=3)
4.1 fps ∼2% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼2% -34%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.3 fps ∼2% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼2% -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.7 fps ∼1% -66%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=3)
14.5 fps ∼16% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13.1 fps ∼14% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.72 (min: 4.95, max: 24.96) fps ∼9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.21 - 8.72, n=2)
7.47 fps ∼8% -14%
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7.67 fps ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=3)
7.48 fps ∼21%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.43 - 6.43, n=2)
3.22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12.04 fps ∼9%
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=3)
11.6 fps ∼8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5.35 - 5.35, n=2)
2.68 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
0 fps ∼0%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
170921 Points ∼30% +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
156772 Points ∼28% +55%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 566378, n=31)
147105 Points ∼26% +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (101367 - 108360, n=3)
104311 Points ∼18% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
101367 Points ∼18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
86908 Points ∼15% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -23%
Lenovo Tab M10
70878 Points ∼13% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12% -31%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
122959 Points ∼43% +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (71303 - 75333, n=2)
73318 Points ∼26% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
71303 Points ∼25%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67)
69584 Points ∼25% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
66863 Points ∼24% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼23% -11%
Lenovo Tab M10
58122 Points ∼21% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
55314 Points ∼20% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
44191 Points ∼16% -38%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (1423 - 3130, n=2)
2277 Score ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1423 Score ∼28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904
927 Score ∼18%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018
1628 Points ∼80% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1144 Points ∼56% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1016 Points ∼50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (974 - 1016, n=3)
991 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=109)
753 Points ∼37% -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼36% -27%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points ∼36% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
682 Points ∼34% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6760 Points ∼23% +530%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2816 Points ∼10% +162%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=109)
2249 Points ∼8% +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1038 - 1114, n=3)
1075 Points ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1073 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points ∼3% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
943 Points ∼3% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼3% -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
511 Points ∼2% -52%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2894 Points ∼39% +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1935 - 2973, n=3)
2329 Points ∼31% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2079 Points ∼28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼26% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼20% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1362 Points ∼18% -34%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1334 Points ∼18% -36%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=109)
1072 Points ∼14% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
969 Points ∼13% -53%
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points ∼11% -59%
System
Apple iPad 6 2018
6820 Points ∼41% +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5315 Points ∼32% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3517 - 3957, n=3)
3754 Points ∼23% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3517 Points ∼21%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼19% -12%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points ∼17% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
2561 Points ∼16% -27%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=109)
2463 Points ∼15% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2240 Points ∼14% -36%
Overall
Apple iPad 6 2018
3163 Points ∼37% +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2653 Points ∼31% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (1679 - 1862, n=3)
1741 Points ∼21% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1681 Points ∼20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼16% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -22%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=109)
1278 Points ∼15% -24%
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points ∼13% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1015 Points ∼12% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
389 Points ∼5% -77%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
1693 Points ∼32% +462%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5300, n=17)
1526 Points ∼29% +407%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
444 Points ∼8% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
301 Points ∼6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (241 - 301, n=2)
271 Points ∼5% -10%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (0 - 110, n=6)
45.9 Points ∼100% +107%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.6 Points ∼73% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 22.7, n=3)
22.5 Points ∼49% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2)
22.14 Points ∼48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
167.2 Points ∼100% +288%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=84)
51.6 Points ∼31% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
49.121 Points ∼29% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼28% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.7 - 45.1, n=3)
43.7 Points ∼26% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
43.131 Points ∼26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼18% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
23.712 Points ∼14% -45%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.219 Points ∼13% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
22.084 Points ∼13% -49%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10)
79 Points ∼100% +41%
Average of class Tablet (23 - 182, n=20)
73.7 Points ∼93% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
66 Points ∼84% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
56 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (52 - 56, n=3)
53.3 Points ∼67% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
42 Points ∼53% -25%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
34 Points ∼43% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
33 Points ∼42% -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 6 2018 (IOS 12.1.1)
65.5 (min: 64, max: 67) runs/min ∼100% +204%
Average of class Tablet (11.1 - 132, n=10)
58.9 runs/min ∼90% +173%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.74 runs/min ∼52% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=3)
21.7 runs/min ∼33% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
21.58 runs/min ∼33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
27967 Points ∼100% +222%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
11312 Points ∼40% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8696 Points ∼31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼31% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=3)
8527 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=170)
6729 Points ∼24% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼19% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
4078 Points ∼15% -53%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points ∼14% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
3855 Points ∼14% -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
11529.2 ms * ∼100% -184%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11447.7 ms * ∼99% -182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
9788.7 ms * ∼85% -141%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼80% -128%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=181)
9243 ms * ∼80% -128%
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 4976, n=3)
4245 ms * ∼37% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
4054.8 ms * ∼35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼34% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
3496.3 ms * ∼30% +14%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
1025.5 ms * ∼9% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585Huawei MediaPad M5 liteAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Lenovo Tab M10Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-30%
101%
-18%
-12%
32%
-6%
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
50.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-24%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-54%
61.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
60.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
49.7 (3.4 - 87.1, n=135)
-24%
44.9 (14.6 - 73.8, n=53)
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
75.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-32%
83.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
68.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=135)
-16%
62.4 (21.2 - 87.7, n=53)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
11.37
13.39
18%
10.01
-12%
77.25
579%
9.37
-18%
11.32
0%
18.79
65%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=179)
62%
5.82 (0.13 - 77.9, n=204)
-49%
Random Read 4KB
62.56
71.13
14%
23.46
-62%
73.47
17%
27.72
-56%
52.5
-16%
79.19
27%
38.6 (3.59 - 117, n=179)
-38%
18.7 (1.32 - 142, n=204)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
90.71
103.32
14%
45.88
-49%
82.56
-9%
147.67
63%
52.6
-42%
197.05
117%
94.7 (14.8 - 189, n=179)
4%
38.8 (2.04 - 208, n=204)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.03
285.63
-5%
215.76
-28%
308.15
3%
262.2
-13%
279.94
-7%
294.35
-2%
235 (25.8 - 452, n=179)
-22%
110 (6.75 - 741, n=204)
-63%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth; 0.12.0: Ø29.6 (22-32)
; Balanced; 0.12.0: Ø25.8 (16-28)
; HD; 0.12.0: Ø29 (1-32)
Asphalt 9
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø28.7 (24-31)
; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø27.5 (17-31)
Battle Bay
0102030405060Tooltip
; 4.4.22399: Ø46.8 (35-58)
Carga Máxima
 35.4 °C31.3 °C33.6 °C 
 36.3 °C31 °C32.2 °C 
 32.6 °C30.8 °C33.4 °C 
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 33 °C
29.3 °C30.7 °C33.1 °C
29.5 °C29.8 °C33.2 °C
29.4 °C30.8 °C32 °C
Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the front of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
Heatmap of the back of the device under load
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.924.32530.9323126.3284027.326.45033.130.96326.322.28024.224.910024.43612518.14416022.552.520018.55125017.557.731514.766.140015.266.350014.670.16301574.280013.473.8100014.370.7125013.868.8160013.568.6200013.772.1250013.575.1315014.276.6400013.971.9500014.676.4630014.976.1800014.978.71000014.775.21250014.765.4160001553SPL26.686.2N0.869.5median 14.7median 70.1Delta1.88.332.33625.634.825.73627.428.13735.523.328.621.431.521.734.719.942.717.448.71756.716.45914.558.714.26314.160.512.655.612.557.61258.311.863.311.669.611.469.311.369.911.470.911.171.611.270.411.369.511.269.411.359.811.359.411.349.565.56767.167.365.824.180.518.919.520.221.617.80.646.7median 11.8median 59.81.79.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.66 / 4.28 / 4.44 Watt
Carga midlight 7.53 / 9.09 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
17%
12%
4%
3%
-60%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1.66
1.26
24%
1.18
29%
2.8
-69%
1.55
7%
2.2
-33%
2.07
-25%
Idle Average *
4.28
4.22
1%
4.65
-9%
3.3
23%
4.17
3%
7.8
-82%
3.94
8%
Idle Maximum *
4.44
4.29
3%
4.74
-7%
3.9
12%
4.25
4%
7.9
-78%
3.96
11%
Load Average *
7.53
5.48
27%
5.75
24%
5.2
31%
7.13
5%
12.6
-67%
4.07
46%
Load Maximum *
9.09
6.57
28%
6.97
23%
7.2
21%
9.63
-6%
12.8
-41%
5.73
37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
12h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 47min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Battery Runtime
30%
22%
-28%
15%
-10%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1500
2634
76%
1960
31%
960
-36%
2162
44%
1263
-16%
H.264
838
893
7%
963
15%
585
-30%
934
11%
864
3%
WiFi v1.3
723
826
14%
938
30%
542
-25%
852
18%
623
-14%
714
-1%
Load
347
428
23%
385
11%
274
-21%
299
-14%
300
-14%
185
-47%

Pro

+ Design fino
+ Android 9.0 Pie
+ Modo Crianças
+ Bluetooth 5.0 com suporte para codecs de alta resolução
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Bom painel LCD

Contra

- Sem sensor de luz ambiente
- Tela mais escura que a do seu antecessor
- Cabo USB curto incluído na caixa
- Alto-falantes abaixo do esperado
- Jogos com engasgos
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) tablet review.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) tablet review.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) é um tablet de nível básico acessível que já pode ser encontrado por menos de € 200 (~$ 223 USD). O mesmo se aplica ao seu antecessor, que tem uma melhor tela, alto-falantes e mais memória RAM. Além disso, o Tab A 10.5 tem uma duração de bateria mais longa e suporta um teclado opcional. O Tab A 10.1 brilha com seu SoC aprimorado e sua versão mais recente do Android. Vale a pena mencionar o último, pois os tablets muitas vezes não recebem atualizações de software com a mesma frequência que os smartphones.

No geral, escolher entre o Tab A 10.1 e seu antecessor depende do que você acha importante em um tablet. A diferença de preço entre os dois dispositivos provavelmente diminuirá no futuro, o que tornaria o Tab A 10.1 mais uma opção atraente.

O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, que é um bom valor pelo dinheiro e é bem adequado para uso por famílias com crianças pequenas.

2 GB de RAM e 32 GB de armazenamento são bastante frugais para um sistema com Android 9.0 Pie, especialmente porque a Samsung posicionou o Tab A 10.1 como um dispositivo familiar que suporta múltiplas contas de usuário. A falta de um sensor de luz ambiente e nenhum modo de leitura integrado parece também uma medida para reduzir custos. Resumindo, o Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, mas a Samsung cortou alguns cantos demais para o nosso gosto.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 - 05/30/2019 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
69 / 80 → 87%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
33 / 65 → 51%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
34 / 68 → 50%
Desempenho da aplicação
56 / 76 → 74%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Médio
71%
84%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-06- 1 (Update: 2019-06- 2)