Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 802:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Lenovo Tab M10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.50 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50 | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | -5% | -37% | -41% | 35% | 25% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 401 | 542 35% | 426 6% | 514 28% | 339 -15% | 556 39% | 452 13% | 530 32% |
| Brightness | 396 | 520 31% | 399 1% | 492 24% | 327 -17% | 514 30% | 453 14% | 513 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 91 6% | 80 -7% | 86 0% | 87 1% | 90 5% | 92 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.68 -36% | 0.38 24% | 0.96 -92% | 0.42 16% | 0.42 16% | 0.61 -22% | |
| Contrast | 802 | 797 -1% | 1121 40% | 535 -33% | 807 1% | 1324 65% | 869 8% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 4.2 -45% | 4.5 -55% | 5.42 -87% | 5.8 -100% | 1.8 38% | 1.7 41% | 1.2 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 6.7 -16% | 7.9 -36% | 9.84 -70% | 11.6 -100% | 3.2 45% | 3.7 36% | 3.2 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 4.8 -17% | 5.2 -27% | 6.5 -59% | 8.6 -110% | 2.2 46% | 2.4 41% | 1 76% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.216 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7263 89% | 7434 87% | 6875 95% | 6780 96% | 8718 75% | 6819 95% | 6337 103% | 6588 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
| Vulkan Medium Native | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.21 - 8.72, n=2) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room | |
| Average of class Tablet (1183 - 8816, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (241 - 301, n=2) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.2 - 45.1, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
| Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Lenovo Tab M10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -31% | 101% | -18% | -12% | 32% | 5% | 516% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 300 | 285.6 -5% | 215.8 -28% | 308.1 3% | 262.2 -13% | 279.9 -7% | 294.4 -2% | 242 ? -19% | 850 ? 183% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 90.7 | 103.3 14% | 45.88 -49% | 82.6 -9% | 147.7 63% | 52.6 -42% | 197.1 117% | 100.5 ? 11% | 532 ? 487% |
| Random Read 4KB | 62.6 | 71.1 14% | 23.46 -63% | 73.5 17% | 27.72 -56% | 52.5 -16% | 79.2 27% | 43.2 ? -31% | 167 ? 167% |
| Random Write 4KB | 11.37 | 13.39 18% | 10.01 -12% | 77.3 580% | 9.37 -18% | 11.32 0% | 18.79 65% | 22.4 ? 97% | 150.8 ? 1226% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.2 ? | 80.6 ? -1% | 75.5 ? -7% | 83.7 ? 3% | 55.5 ? -32% | 83.5 ? 3% | 76.1 ? -6% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.6 ? | 60.4 ? -8% | 50.1 ? -24% | 72.8 ? 11% | 30.14 ? -54% | 61.2 ? -7% | 60.8 ? -7% | 52.9 ? -19% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9
Battle Bay
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.13 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.66 / 4.28 / 4.44 Watt |
| Carga |
7.53 / 9.09 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 12% | 4% | 3% | -60% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.66 | 1.26 24% | 1.18 29% | 2.8 -69% | 1.55 7% | 2.2 -33% | 2.07 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 4.28 | 4.22 1% | 4.65 -9% | 3.3 23% | 4.17 3% | 7.8 -82% | 3.94 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.44 | 4.29 3% | 4.74 -7% | 3.9 12% | 4.25 4% | 7.9 -78% | 3.96 11% |
| Load Average * | 7.53 | 5.48 27% | 5.75 24% | 5.2 31% | 7.13 5% | 12.6 -67% | 4.07 46% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.09 | 6.57 28% | 6.97 23% | 7.2 21% | 9.63 -6% | 12.8 -41% | 5.73 37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | 22% | -28% | 15% | -10% | -24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1500 | 2634 76% | 1960 31% | 960 -36% | 2162 44% | 1263 -16% | |
| H.264 | 838 | 893 7% | 963 15% | 585 -30% | 934 11% | 864 3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 723 | 826 14% | 938 30% | 542 -25% | 852 18% | 623 -14% | 714 -1% |
| Load | 347 | 428 23% | 385 11% | 274 -21% | 299 -14% | 300 -14% | 185 -47% |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) é um tablet de nível básico acessível que já pode ser encontrado por menos de € 200 (~$ 223 USD). O mesmo se aplica ao seu antecessor, que tem uma melhor tela, alto-falantes e mais memória RAM. Além disso, o Tab A 10.5 tem uma duração de bateria mais longa e suporta um teclado opcional. O Tab A 10.1 brilha com seu SoC aprimorado e sua versão mais recente do Android. Vale a pena mencionar o último, pois os tablets muitas vezes não recebem atualizações de software com a mesma frequência que os smartphones.
No geral, escolher entre o Tab A 10.1 e seu antecessor depende do que você acha importante em um tablet. A diferença de preço entre os dois dispositivos provavelmente diminuirá no futuro, o que tornaria o Tab A 10.1 mais uma opção atraente.
O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, que é um bom valor pelo dinheiro e é bem adequado para uso por famílias com crianças pequenas.
2 GB de RAM e 32 GB de armazenamento são bastante frugais para um sistema com Android 9.0 Pie, especialmente porque a Samsung posicionou o Tab A 10.1 como um dispositivo familiar que suporta múltiplas contas de usuário. A falta de um sensor de luz ambiente e nenhum modo de leitura integrado parece também uma medida para reduzir custos. Resumindo, o Tab A 10.1 é um tablet de baixo custo, mas a Samsung cortou alguns cantos demais para o nosso gosto.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
-
11/05/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
