Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - Uma bateria gigante com tela de 90 Hz

Smartphone 5G econômico. O Moto G 5G Plus é o mais recente celular de gama média da Motorola. O smartphone Moto-G combina uma enorme bateria de 5.000 mAh com um Snapdragon 765G a um preço de varejo recomendado de pouco menos de 350 euros (~$ 413). Você pode descobrir se vale a pena comprar este smartphone da Motorola nesta análise do Moto G 5G Plus.
Marcus Herbrich (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Moto G Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.70 polegadas 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, LTPS, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 44 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm-Klinke, Card Reader: microSD de até 1TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, E-compass, OTG, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: 1/3/7/8/28/38/41/77/78, 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/43/66, 3G: 1/2/4/5/8, 2G: 0/1 /2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 168 x 74
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (ƒ/1,7, 1,6 µm) + 5 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (ƒ/2,0, 1,0 µm, Ultra-Wide-Angle) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Onscreen, Capa protetora, carregador TurboPower, cabo USB-C, Guia de início rápido, SIM Toolkit, Moto UI, 24 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, SAR: Head - 0.99 W/kg, Body - 1.50 W/kg, fanless
peso
207 g, Suprimento de energia: 39 g
Preço
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
83 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy A71
SD 730, Adreno 618
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
77 %
08/2020
Oppo A72
SD 665, Adreno 610
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone

Size comparison

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g163.6 mm 76 mm 7.7 mm 179 g162 mm 75.5 mm 8.9 mm 192 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (330min - 356max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (295min - 356max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% -13%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 (284min - 346max) MBit/s ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
317 (151min - 367max) MBit/s ∼47% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼41% -57%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (646-677)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (590-656)
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Ultra-wide-angle
Ultra-wide-angle
Main Camera
Main Camera
5x-Zoom
5x-Zoom
8x-Zoom (max)
8x-Zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
32 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: 35.57 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 51.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: 12.22 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 19.57 ∆E
450
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 484 cd/m² Médio: 458.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.47 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 461 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.01 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Samsung Galaxy A71
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Oppo A72
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-2%
18%
-41%
-62%
-156%
Brightness middle
461
584
27%
605
31%
529
15%
629
36%
505
10%
Brightness
458
583
27%
608
33%
531
16%
646
41%
482
5%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
95
2%
94
1%
95
2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.52
0.55
-6%
Contrast
887
918
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.01
1.17
-16%
0.84
17%
2.53
-150%
2.7
-167%
6.3
-524%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
2.95
-40%
1.8
14%
4.52
-115%
6
-186%
10.1
-381%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.7
-13%
1.3
13%
1.7
-13%
3
-100%
6.8
-353%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.231 99%
2.211 100%
2.249 98%
2.1 105%
2.29 96%
CCT
6701 97%
6341 103%
6310 103%
6462 101%
6340 103%
8161 80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼68% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼66% +13%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
387 Points ∼20% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1095 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=67)
1894 Points ∼100% +73%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼71% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼70% +14%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
453 Points ∼27% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1022 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6252, n=70)
1659 Points ∼100% +62%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
977 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1615 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
861 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1054 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1737 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1647 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1256 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (1869 - 1954, n=2)
1912 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=171)
1932 Points ∼98% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼81% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
542 Points ∼81% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼46% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (589 - 596, n=2)
593 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=171)
558 Points ∼83% -6%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8215 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8968 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
8215 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=365)
4925 Points ∼55% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7832 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7765 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
7832 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14476, n=432)
5053 Points ∼65% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2785 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2863 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
2785 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4970, n=432)
1545 Points ∼54% -45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼68% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼67% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼82% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7773 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11432 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (8336 - 8756, n=2)
8546 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=568)
6082 Points ∼53% -31%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼80% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼82% -10%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8885 Points ∼82% -10%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7651 Points ∼70% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (9914 - 10045, n=2)
9980 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=717)
6703 Points ∼62% -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼93% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼99% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2445 Points ∼85% -13%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2287 Points ∼79% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2802 - 2810, n=2)
2806 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼91% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼67% -25%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1731 Points ∼54% -39%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2786 - 2844, n=2)
2815 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼94% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼72% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1851 Points ∼59% -34%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1123 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2791 - 2814, n=2)
2803 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼85% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼86% -12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2154 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3442 - 3457, n=2)
3450 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼99% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2085 Points ∼58% -34%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼28% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3165 - 3165, n=2)
3165 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼64% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼71% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2214 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1097 Points ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3223 - 3236, n=2)
3230 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼88% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2702 Points ∼76% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2199 Points ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3449 - 3512, n=2)
3481 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼70% -23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3101 Points ∼58% -36%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1653 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4829 - 4865, n=2)
4847 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼73% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼98% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3002 Points ∼61% -33%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4435 - 4484, n=2)
4460 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼53% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼93% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3210 Points ∼92% -7%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2246 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3435 - 3445, n=2)
3440 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2296 Points ∼69% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
980 Points ∼30% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2897 - 2963, n=2)
2930 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼57% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼73% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2451 Points ∼73% -19%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1134 Points ∼34% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3001 - 3015, n=2)
3008 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼54% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2792 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2282 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3435 - 3498, n=2)
3467 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼62% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼89% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2999 Points ∼51% -36%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1564 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4654 - 4671, n=2)
4663 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼77% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2950 Points ∼63% -33%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼36% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4325 - 4401, n=2)
4363 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼46% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼95% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21898 Points ∼100% +9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17865 Points ∼82% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (20156 - 20185, n=2)
20171 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼73% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52600 Points ∼76% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24321 Points ∼35% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (62756 - 62819, n=2)
62788 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼42% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼86% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
40105 Points ∼87% -6%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
22445 Points ∼49% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (42735 - 42752, n=2)
42744 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼49% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼98% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼86% -3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼87% -2%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼36% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (86 - 87, n=2)
86.5 fps ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=835)
48.7 fps ∼50% -43%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼78% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼78% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼77% -21%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼42% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (75 - 78, n=2)
76.5 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=844)
32.5 fps ∼42% -57%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼89% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼75% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼75% -18%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼35% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (50 - 50, n=2)
50 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=740)
28.9 fps ∼53% -42%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼67% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼31% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (44 - 48, n=2)
46 fps ∼84% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=748)
23.8 fps ∼43% -46%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼79% -9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼79% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼34% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (33 - 33, n=2)
33 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=603)
23.1 fps ∼61% -30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼79% -7%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (29 - 32, n=2)
30.5 fps ∼90% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=605)
20.6 fps ∼61% -29%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼77% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4 fps ∼31% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (11 - 12, n=2)
11.5 fps ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=367)
11.8 fps ∼91% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps ∼32% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (7.5 - 7.5, n=2)
7.5 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=365)
8.21 fps ∼97% +9%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.2 fps ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (18 - 20, n=2)
19 fps ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=371)
17.6 fps ∼84% -2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% -14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% -14%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.8 fps ∼33% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (21 - 21, n=2)
21 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=371)
20.1 fps ∼84% -4%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.9 fps ∼33% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=528)
15.4 fps ∼73% -19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼95% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼89% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼79% -6%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=532)
13.6 fps ∼72% -15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼82% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247507 Points ∼75% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
177251 Points ∼53% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (279244 - 304120, n=2)
291682 Points ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=153)
324151 Points ∼98% +16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points ∼93% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1103 Points ∼75% -24%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (1399 - 1456, n=2)
1428 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=765)
843 Points ∼58% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points ∼74% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3175 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1897 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4681 - 4697, n=2)
4689 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=765)
2614 Points ∼50% -44%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points ∼66% -21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3466 Points ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2451 Points ∼43% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4528 - 4775, n=2)
4652 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=765)
1977 Points ∼35% -59%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6426 Points ∼94% -5%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4787 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (6612 - 6745, n=2)
6679 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=765)
3587 Points ∼53% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points ∼82% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼99% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2972 Points ∼73% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼55% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3742 - 3845, n=2)
3794 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=765)
1844 Points ∼45% -52%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (48.3 - 48.6, n=2)
48.5 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=227)
42.9 Points ∼73% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
36.578 Points ∼62% -25%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
22.887 Points ∼39% -53%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼99% +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (87.8 - 88.5, n=2)
88.1 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
65.293 Points ∼69% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=660)
50.4 Points ∼53% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼95% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=206)
45.1 runs/min ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼75% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (26.8 - 45.2, n=2)
36 runs/min ∼67% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
32.8 runs/min ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
28.2 runs/min ∼53% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (72 - 78, n=2)
75 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=298)
71 Points ∼70% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼69% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
60 Points ∼59% -23%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
50 Points ∼50% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼97% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (16302 - 17700, n=2)
17001 Points ∼89% +4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
12771 Points ∼67% -22%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
9345 Points ∼49% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=830)
8415 Points ∼44% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=856)
9483 ms * ∼100% -243%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
4487.2 ms * ∼47% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
3435.5 ms * ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼31% -6%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼30% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2754 - 2764, n=2)
2759 ms * ∼29% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteOnePlus NordSamsung Galaxy A71Oppo A72Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
51%
-6%
38%
-16%
-16%
-17%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
31.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32)
-21%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
37.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-57%
68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32)
-22%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
119.3
138.47
16%
125.75
5%
104.5
-12%
109.57
-8%
152.9
28%
68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43)
-42%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
138.14
156.45
13%
134.57
-3%
126.7
-8%
112.25
-19%
135.91
-2%
133 (78.2 - 173, n=43)
-4%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
180.21
476.87
165%
213.22
18%
473.1
163%
192.38
7%
234.61
30%
199 (133 - 388, n=43)
10%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
885.34
979.54
11%
501.29
-43%
955.5
8%
493.04
-44%
504.32
-43%
703 (476 - 895, n=43)
-21%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-59%
PUBG mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.8 (33-41)
; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø21.3 (5-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (18-31)
Carga Máxima
 43.9 °C42.7 °C41.8 °C 
 44.1 °C41.4 °C41.8 °C 
 42.9 °C41.4 °C42.2 °C 
Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 42.5 °C
36.2 °C40.5 °C39.1 °C
37 °C40.7 °C42.9 °C
38.6 °C41 °C42.1 °C
Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.246.6253941.53134.336.74039.337.45042.143.36331.733.58026.325.710026.425.912525.633.316022.144.320019.348.525018.952.931516.558.74001662.950014.366.763015.769.380015.274.5100013.777.4125011.776.216001274.6200012.466.6250011.165.6315011.266.3400011.870.2500012.968.7630013.775.6800014.178.8100001481.4125001371.21600011.461SPL71.76863.425.986.2N27.222.415.80.866.1median 14median 66.7Delta2.610.536.845.839.944.331.935.538.936.643.740.929.830.325.926.526.333.324.938.521.642.21942.718.94618.15416.66116.265.814.969.71568.715.671.914.972.614.970.115.673.414.671.314.268.114.16514.46114.665.614.968.615.268.415.457.115.756.666.36470.627.581.519.715.825.3150.4median 15.4median 65.62.18.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.1 / 2.9 Watt
Carga midlight 6.7 / 9.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Oppo A72
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
42%
19%
38%
33%
15%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.5
-0%
0.8
47%
1.8
-20%
0.63
58%
0.7
53%
1.25 (1 - 1.5, n=2)
17%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927)
41%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.2
-5%
1.1
48%
2.1
-0%
1.49
29%
1.97
6%
1.75 (1.4 - 2.1, n=2)
17%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2.9
-0%
1.8
38%
2.3
21%
1.51
48%
1.98
32%
2.45 (2 - 2.9, n=2)
16%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927)
30%
Load Average *
6.7
4.4
34%
3.7
45%
3.4
49%
4.62
31%
3.83
43%
5.75 (4.8 - 6.7, n=2)
14%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921)
39%
Load Maximum *
9.2
7.2
22%
6.1
34%
5.2
43%
7.11
23%
6.2
33%
8.25 (7.3 - 9.2, n=2)
10%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921)
33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 12min
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh
Oppo A72
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
56%
59%
28%
31%
11%
Reader / Idle
1549
1683
9%
2249
45%
2003
29%
2164
40%
H.264
581
1403
141%
1370
136%
1064
83%
1164
100%
WiFi v1.3
914
884
-3%
1095
20%
869
-5%
815
-11%
1018
11%
Load
252
448
78%
337
34%
261
4%
242
-4%

Pro

+ Tela bem calibrada
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ WiFi veloz
+ Tela de 90Hz
+ Muitas frequências LTE
+ 5G
+ SoC potente...

Contra

- ...com fraquezas na vida cotidiana
- Desempenho nos jogos
- Sensação tátil
- Câmeras

Veredicto - Nada mal, nada bom

In the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus review: Test device provided by Motorola Germany.
In the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus review: Test device provided by Motorola Germany.

O Motorola Moto G 5G Plus oferece um hardware muito bom emparelhado com uma bateria de longa duração e um poderoso SoC Snapdragon 765G. No entanto, há muito a criticar sobre o mais recente protegido da série Moto G, apesar de seu baixo preço de cerca de 350 Euros (~$ 413).


O design é certamente uma questão de gosto, mas ainda achamos o furo duplo um pouco desafortunado, especialmente porque a qualidade da câmera selfie com grande angular torna a segunda lente obsoleta. Os demais módulos de câmera também estão um pouco abaixo da média, mesmo para essa faixa de preço. A sensação táctil está um pouco limitada aos elementos plásticos do telefone e à carcaça muito forte, o que é necessário por causa da bateria muito grande de 5.000 mAh. O tempo de duração não justifica a grande capacidade da bateria - ainda vemos (muito) espaço para otimização em termos de gerenciamento de energia.      

O Moto G 5G Plus prova ser um smartphone de gama média sólido em nosso teste. No entanto, alguns pontos fracos estragam a impressão geral do telefone celular da Motorola. 

A velocidade do sistema inconsistente é um pouco surpreendente. Na vida cotidiana, o desempenho é satisfatório e, graças à tela de 90 Hz, a operação é boa e fluente, mas em combinação com apenas 4 GB de RAM, o Snapdragon 765G em nosso dispositivo de teste tem quedas de desempenho incomumente frequentes - o desempenho de jogos do SoC Qualcomm no Moto G 5G Plus, especialmente porque está usando o Adreno como GPU, é incrivelmente ruim. 

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - 12/10/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
53 / 70 → 76%
Peso
88%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
33 / 64 → 52%
Desempenho da aplicação
72 / 86 → 83%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 78%
Camera
59%
Médio
75%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - Uma bateria gigante com tela de 90 Hz
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08-18 (Update: 2020-08-22)