Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - Uma bateria gigante com tela de 90 Hz

Name: Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Brand: Motorola

Smartphone 5G econômico. O Moto G 5G Plus é o mais recente celular de gama média da Motorola. O smartphone Moto-G combina uma enorme bateria de 5.000 mAh com um Snapdragon 765G a um preço de varejo recomendado de pouco menos de 350 euros (~$ 413). Você pode descobrir se vale a pena comprar este smartphone da Motorola nesta análise do Moto G 5G Plus.

Marcus Herbrich (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/18/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Moto G Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Memória

4096 MB

Pantalha

6.70 polegadas 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, LTPS, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 44 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm-Klinke, Card Reader: microSD de até 1TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, E-compass, OTG, Miracast

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: 1/3/7/8/28/38/41/77/78, 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/43/66, 3G: 1/2/4/5/8, 2G: 0/1 /2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 168 x 74

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (ƒ/1,7, 1,6 µm) + 5 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (ƒ/2,0, 1,0 µm, Ultra-Wide-Angle) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Onscreen, Capa protetora, carregador TurboPower, cabo USB-C, Guia de início rápido, SIM Toolkit, Moto UI, 24 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, SAR: Head - 0.99 W/kg, Body - 1.50 W/kg, fanless

peso

207 g, Suprimento de energia: 39 g

Preço

350 Euro

Links

Motorola página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80 %	08/2020	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus SD 765, Adreno 620	207 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2520x1080
84 %	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080
83 %	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618	204 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
83 %	08/2020	OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620	184 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.44"	2440x1080
82 %	02/2020	Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618	179 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
77 %	08/2020	Oppo A72 SD 665, Adreno 610	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080

Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size comparison

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Samsung Galaxy A71 Oppo A72 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite OnePlus Nord ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	666 (646^min - 677^max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (563^min - 668^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (545^min - 662^max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Oppo A72 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	347 (330^min - 356^max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	341 (334^min - 349^max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	338 (295^min - 356^max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 (618^min - 677^max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	646 (590^min - 656^max) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	563 (275^min - 666^max) MBit/s ∼84% -13%
Oppo A72 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	330 (284^min - 346^max) MBit/s ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	324 (310^min - 330^max) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	317 (151^min - 367^max) MBit/s ∼47% -51%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼41% -57%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (646-677)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (590-656)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: 35.57 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 51.55 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.info/Breve-Analise-do-Smartphone-Motorola-Moto-G-5G-Plus-Uma-bateria-gigante-com-tela-de-90-Hz.488564.0.html">Motorola Moto G 5G Plus</a> — Motorola Moto G 5G Plus


450 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	448 cd/m²
459 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	455 cd/m²
484 cd/m²	460 cd/m²	450 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 484 cd/m² Médio: 458.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.47 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 461 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.01 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44	Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70	Oppo A72 IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen		-2%	18%	-41%	-62%	-156%
Brightness middle	461	584 27%	605 31%	529 15%	629 36%	505 10%
Brightness	458	583 27%	608 33%	531 16%	646 41%	482 5%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	95 2%	94 1%	95 2%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.52					0.55 -6%
Contrast	887					918 3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.01	1.17 -16%	0.84 17%	2.53 -150%	2.7 -167%	6.3 -524%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	2.1	2.95 -40%	1.8 14%	4.52 -115%	6 -186%	10.1 -381%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.5	1.7 -13%	1.3 13%	1.7 -13%	3 -100%	6.8 -353%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.231 ^99%	2.211 ^100%	2.249 ^98%	2.1 ^105%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	6701 ^97%	6341 ^103%	6310 ^103%	6462 ^101%	6340 ^103%	8161 ^80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1095 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1293 Points ∼68% +18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1242 Points ∼66% +13%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	387 Points ∼20% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	1095 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7400, n=67)	1894 Points ∼100% +73%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1022 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1183 Points ∼71% +16%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1169 Points ∼70% +14%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	453 Points ∼27% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	1022 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=70)	1659 Points ∼100% +62%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	903 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	977 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 4043, n=67)	1615 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	861 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	1054 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (272 - 4739, n=62)	1737 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1954 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1908 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1966 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1647 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1256 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (1869 - 1954, n=2)	1912 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=171)	1932 Points ∼98% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	596 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	673 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	547 Points ∼81% -8%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	611 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	542 Points ∼81% -9%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	309 Points ∼46% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (589 - 596, n=2)	593 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=171)	558 Points ∼83% -6%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	8215 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8968 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	8215 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=365)	4925 Points ∼55% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	7832 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7765 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	7832 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14476, n=432)	5053 Points ∼65% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2785 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2863 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	2785 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4970, n=432)	1545 Points ∼54% -45%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	8756 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7786 Points ∼68% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7628 Points ∼67% -13%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9427 Points ∼82% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7773 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11432 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (8336 - 8756, n=2)	8546 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=568)	6082 Points ∼53% -31%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	9914 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8730 Points ∼80% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8941 Points ∼82% -10%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	10876 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	8885 Points ∼82% -10%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7651 Points ∼70% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (9914 - 10045, n=2)	9980 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=717)	6703 Points ∼62% -32%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2802 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2893 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2686 Points ∼93% -4%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2867 Points ∼99% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2445 Points ∼85% -13%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2287 Points ∼79% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2802 - 2810, n=2)	2806 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4061, n=219)	2636 Points ∼91% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2844 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3198 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2143 Points ∼67% -25%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3185 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1731 Points ∼54% -39%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	981 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2786 - 2844, n=2)	2815 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 11259, n=219)	3011 Points ∼94% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2814 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3130 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2244 Points ∼72% -20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3108 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1851 Points ∼59% -34%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1123 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2791 - 2814, n=2)	2803 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6977, n=219)	2656 Points ∼85% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3457 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3495 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3058 Points ∼86% -12%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3544 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2154 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3442 - 3457, n=2)	3450 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=576)	2290 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3165 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3589 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2466 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3556 Points ∼99% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2085 Points ∼58% -34%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points ∼28% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3165 - 3165, n=2)	3165 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=576)	2288 Points ∼64% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3236 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3605 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2577 Points ∼71% -20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3553 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2214 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1097 Points ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3223 - 3236, n=2)	3230 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=577)	2113 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3512 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3492 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3134 Points ∼88% -11%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3555 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2702 Points ∼76% -23%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2199 Points ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3449 - 3512, n=2)	3481 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=607)	2208 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4865 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5335 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3751 Points ∼70% -23%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5357 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3101 Points ∼58% -36%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1653 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4829 - 4865, n=2)	4847 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=607)	3140 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4484 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4893 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points ∼73% -20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4815 Points ∼98% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3002 Points ∼61% -33%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1765 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4435 - 4484, n=2)	4460 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=607)	2578 Points ∼53% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3445 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3425 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3257 Points ∼93% -5%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3503 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3210 Points ∼92% -7%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2246 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3435 - 3445, n=2)	3440 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=656)	2165 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	2963 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3321 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2298 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3284 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2296 Points ∼69% -23%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	980 Points ∼30% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2897 - 2963, n=2)	2930 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=656)	1906 Points ∼57% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3015 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3346 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2459 Points ∼73% -18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3330 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2451 Points ∼73% -19%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1134 Points ∼34% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3001 - 3015, n=2)	3008 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=657)	1809 Points ∼54% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3498 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3452 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3294 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3476 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2792 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2282 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3435 - 3498, n=2)	3467 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=698)	2038 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4654 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5832 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3610 Points ∼62% -22%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5171 Points ∼89% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2999 Points ∼51% -36%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1564 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4654 - 4671, n=2)	4663 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=697)	2545 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4401 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4693 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points ∼77% -18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4665 Points ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2950 Points ∼63% -33%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1675 Points ∼36% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4325 - 4401, n=2)	4363 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=700)	2173 Points ∼46% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	20156 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20429 Points ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	20767 Points ∼95% +3%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21016 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	21898 Points ∼100% +9%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	17865 Points ∼82% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (20156 - 20185, n=2)	20171 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=842)	15957 Points ∼73% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	62756 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	69506 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53194 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69285 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	52600 Points ∼76% -16%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24321 Points ∼35% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (62756 - 62819, n=2)	62788 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=840)	29153 Points ∼42% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	42735 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	45304 Points ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39491 Points ∼86% -8%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	45872 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	40105 Points ∼87% -6%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	22445 Points ∼49% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (42735 - 42752, n=2)	42744 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=840)	22274 Points ∼49% -48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	86 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	95 fps ∼98% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	83 fps ∼86% -3%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	97 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps ∼87% -2%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps ∼36% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (86 - 87, n=2)	86.5 fps ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=835)	48.7 fps ∼50% -43%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	75 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps ∼78% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼78% -20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	60 fps ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps ∼77% -21%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	32 fps ∼42% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (75 - 78, n=2)	76.5 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=844)	32.5 fps ∼42% -57%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	50 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	49 fps ∼89% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼75% -18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	55 fps ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼75% -18%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps ∼35% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (50 - 50, n=2)	50 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=740)	28.9 fps ∼53% -42%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	44 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps ∼71% -11%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps ∼91% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	37 fps ∼67% -16%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	17 fps ∼31% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (44 - 48, n=2)	46 fps ∼84% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=748)	23.8 fps ∼43% -46%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	33 fps ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼79% -9%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼79% -9%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼34% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (33 - 33, n=2)	33 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=603)	23.1 fps ∼61% -30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	29 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	33 fps ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps ∼79% -7%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (29 - 32, n=2)	30.5 fps ∼90% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=605)	20.6 fps ∼61% -29%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	11 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	13 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps ∼77% -9%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4 fps ∼31% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (11 - 12, n=2)	11.5 fps ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=367)	11.8 fps ∼91% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	7.5 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.7 fps ∼32% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (7.5 - 7.5, n=2)	7.5 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=365)	8.21 fps ∼97% +9%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	18 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼81% -6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps ∼76% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.2 fps ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (18 - 20, n=2)	19 fps ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=371)	17.6 fps ∼84% -2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	21 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	24 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼75% -14%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼75% -14%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.8 fps ∼33% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (21 - 21, n=2)	21 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=371)	20.1 fps ∼84% -4%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	19 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼81% -11%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼81% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.9 fps ∼33% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (19 - 19, n=2)	19 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=528)	15.4 fps ∼73% -19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	16 fps ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps ∼95% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼89% +6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps ∼79% -6%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (16 - 18, n=2)	17 fps ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=532)	13.6 fps ∼72% -15%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	279244 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	318669 Points ∼96% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	273255 Points ∼82% -2%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	332074 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	247507 Points ∼75% -11%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	177251 Points ∼53% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (279244 - 304120, n=2)	291682 Points ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=153)	324151 Points ∼98% +16%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	1456 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1462 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1365 Points ∼93% -6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1441 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1103 Points ∼75% -24%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1231 Points ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (1399 - 1456, n=2)	1428 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=765)	843 Points ∼58% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4697 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5201 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3864 Points ∼74% -18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5203 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3175 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1897 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4681 - 4697, n=2)	4689 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=765)	2614 Points ∼50% -44%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	4775 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5683 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3752 Points ∼66% -21%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5296 Points ∼93% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3466 Points ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2451 Points ∼43% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (4528 - 4775, n=2)	4652 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=765)	1977 Points ∼35% -59%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	6745 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6069 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6305 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6801 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6426 Points ∼94% -5%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4787 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (6612 - 6745, n=2)	6679 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=765)	3587 Points ∼53% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096	3845 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4094 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3342 Points ∼82% -13%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4054 Points ∼99% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2972 Points ∼73% -23%
Oppo A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2232 Points ∼55% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (3742 - 3845, n=2)	3794 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=765)	1844 Points ∼45% -52%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	58.665 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.232 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	48.568 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (48.3 - 48.6, n=2)	48.5 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	46.148 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=227)	42.9 Points ∼73% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	36.578 Points ∼62% -25%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	22.887 Points ∼39% -53%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	94.481 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	93.643 Points ∼99% +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	88.457 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (87.8 - 88.5, n=2)	88.1 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	82.347 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	65.293 Points ∼69% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=660)	50.4 Points ∼53% -43%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)	53.6 runs/min ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.7 runs/min ∼95% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	45.2 runs/min ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=206)	45.1 runs/min ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	40.4 runs/min ∼75% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (26.8 - 45.2, n=2)	36 runs/min ∼67% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	32.8 runs/min ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	28.2 runs/min ∼53% -38%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	101 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	78 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	76 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (72 - 78, n=2)	75 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=298)	71 Points ∼70% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	70 Points ∼69% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	60 Points ∼59% -23%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	50 Points ∼50% -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	19143 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	18556 Points ∼97% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (16302 - 17700, n=2)	17001 Points ∼89% +4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	16302 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	16197 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	12771 Points ∼67% -22%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	9345 Points ∼49% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=830)	8415 Points ∼44% -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=856)	9483 ms * ∼100% -243%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)	4487.2 ms * ∼47% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	3435.5 ms * ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	2940.5 ms * ∼31% -6%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)	2834.8 ms * ∼30% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)	2764.2 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2754 - 2764, n=2)	2759 ms * ∼29% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	2602.2 ms * ∼27% +6%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite	OnePlus Nord	Samsung Galaxy A71	Oppo A72	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		51%	-6%	38%	-16%	-16%	-17%	-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				57.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	31.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53%	51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32) -21%	51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) -21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				73.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -16%	37.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -57%	68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32) -22%	69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) -20%
Random Write 4KB	119.3	138.47 16%	125.75 5%	104.5 -12%	109.57 -8%	152.9 28%	68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43) -42%	40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -66%
Random Read 4KB	138.14	156.45 13%	134.57 -3%	126.7 -8%	112.25 -19%	135.91 -2%	133 (78.2 - 173, n=43) -4%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB	180.21	476.87 165%	213.22 18%	473.1 163%	192.38 7%	234.61 30%	199 (133 - 388, n=43) 10%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -23%
Sequential Read 256KB	885.34	979.54 11%	501.29 -43%	955.5 8%	493.04 -44%	504.32 -43%	703 (476 - 895, n=43) -21%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -59%

PUBG mobile

; Smooth: Ø39.8 (33-41)

; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)

; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)

Asphalt 9 Legends

; High Quality: Ø21.3 (5-31)

; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (18-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


43.9 °C	42.7 °C	41.8 °C
44.1 °C	41.4 °C	41.8 °C
42.9 °C	41.4 °C	42.2 °C

Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 42.5 °C


36.2 °C	40.5 °C	39.1 °C
37 °C	40.7 °C	42.9 °C
38.6 °C	41 °C	42.1 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.5 / 2.1 / 2.9 Watt
Carga	6.7 / 9.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh	Oppo A72 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	42%	19%	38%	33%	15%	32%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	1.5 -0%	0.8 47%	1.8 -20%	0.63 58%	0.7 53%	1.25 (1 - 1.5, n=2) 17%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927) 41%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.2 -5%	1.1 48%	2.1 -0%	1.49 29%	1.97 6%	1.75 (1.4 - 2.1, n=2) 17%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926) 16%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	2.9 -0%	1.8 38%	2.3 21%	1.51 48%	1.98 32%	2.45 (2 - 2.9, n=2) 16%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927) 30%
Load Average *	6.7	4.4 34%	3.7 45%	3.4 49%	4.62 31%	3.83 43%	5.75 (4.8 - 6.7, n=2) 14%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921) 39%
Load Maximum *	9.2	7.2 22%	6.1 34%	5.2 43%	7.11 23%	6.2 33%	8.25 (7.3 - 9.2, n=2) 10%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921) 33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		15h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 12min

	Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh	Oppo A72 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		56%	59%	28%	31%	11%
Reader / Idle	1549	1683 9%	2249 45%	2003 29%	2164 40%
H.264	581	1403 141%	1370 136%	1064 83%	1164 100%
WiFi v1.3	914	884 -3%	1095 20%	869 -5%	815 -11%	1018 11%
Load	252	448 78%	337 34%	261 4%	242 -4%

Pro

+ Tela bem calibrada

+ Longas durações da bateria

+ WiFi veloz

+ Tela de 90Hz

+ Muitas frequências LTE

+ 5G

+ SoC potente...

Contra

- ...com fraquezas na vida cotidiana

- Desempenho nos jogos

- Sensação tátil

- Câmeras

Veredicto - Nada mal, nada bom

In the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus review: Test device provided by Motorola Germany.

O Motorola Moto G 5G Plus oferece um hardware muito bom emparelhado com uma bateria de longa duração e um poderoso SoC Snapdragon 765G. No entanto, há muito a criticar sobre o mais recente protegido da série Moto G, apesar de seu baixo preço de cerca de 350 Euros (~$ 413).

O design é certamente uma questão de gosto, mas ainda achamos o furo duplo um pouco desafortunado, especialmente porque a qualidade da câmera selfie com grande angular torna a segunda lente obsoleta. Os demais módulos de câmera também estão um pouco abaixo da média, mesmo para essa faixa de preço. A sensação táctil está um pouco limitada aos elementos plásticos do telefone e à carcaça muito forte, o que é necessário por causa da bateria muito grande de 5.000 mAh. O tempo de duração não justifica a grande capacidade da bateria - ainda vemos (muito) espaço para otimização em termos de gerenciamento de energia.

O Moto G 5G Plus prova ser um smartphone de gama média sólido em nosso teste. No entanto, alguns pontos fracos estragam a impressão geral do telefone celular da Motorola.

A velocidade do sistema inconsistente é um pouco surpreendente. Na vida cotidiana, o desempenho é satisfatório e, graças à tela de 90 Hz, a operação é boa e fluente, mas em combinação com apenas 4 GB de RAM, o Snapdragon 765G em nosso dispositivo de teste tem quedas de desempenho incomumente frequentes - o desempenho de jogos do SoC Qualcomm no Moto G 5G Plus, especialmente porque está usando o Adreno como GPU, é incrivelmente ruim.

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - 2020-12-1012/10/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 91%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

53 / 70 → 76%

Peso

88%

Bateria

87%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

33 / 64 → 52%

Desempenho da aplicação

72 / 86 → 83%

Temperatura

86%

Ruído

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 78%

Camera

59%

Médio

75%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Linked Articles

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Moto G Serie)

Análise

•

Breve Análise do Smartphone Mo...

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - Uma bateria gigante com tela de 90 Hz

Vergleichsgeräte

Os Top 10

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Nada mal, nada bom

Linked Articles

Pricecompare