Notebookcheck

Breve análise do Smartphone OnePlus Nord – Retorno do Campeão do Valor?

Challenger azul ártico. A OnePlus demanda menos de 400 Euros (~US$ 470) pelo OnePlus Nord: Um smartphone com tela de 90 Hz, 5G, SoC rápido, muito armazenamento interno e um exterior premium. O OnePlus finalmente conseguiu voltar a oferecer o telefone de melhor valor?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
OnePlus Nord
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memória
12288 MB 
Pantalha
6.44 polegadas 20:9, 2440 x 1080 pixel 414 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 234 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (Banda 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,18,19,20,26,28,32,34,38,39,40,41,66); 5G (N1,3,7,28,78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 158.3 x 73.3
Bateria
4115 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Warp Charge 30T
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 0.8μm/48MP, 1.6μm(4in1)/12MP; 6 lenses, f/1.75, OIS (main camera); 8 MP, f/2.25, 119° field of view (wide-angle lens); 2 MP, f/2.4 (macro lens); 5 MP, f/2.4 (depth of field camera)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 0.8μm/32MP, 1.6μm(4in1)/8MP, f/2.45, fixed-focus lens (câmera principal); 8 MP, f/2.45, 105° field of view (lente grande angular)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, protetor de silicone, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE 4x4 MIMO Cat. 18 / Cat. 13 (1.2 Gb/s download, 150 Mb/s upload); SAR value: 0.90 W/kg (head), 1,27 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
184 g, Suprimento de energia: 139 g
Preço
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
85 %
05/2020
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
148 g128 GB NVMe4.7"1334x750
82 %
07/2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
86 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640
186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
83 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord
OnePlus Nord

Size Comparison

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (min: 563, max: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (min: 321, max: 653) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (min: 473, max: 652) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (min: 319, max: 345) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (min: 400, max: 892) MBit/s ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (min: 275, max: 666) MBit/s ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (min: 155, max: 377) MBit/s ∼40% -42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (min: 234, max: 277) MBit/s ∼31% -55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼31% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (563-668)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (406-666)
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – turn
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – turn
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
Locating OnePlus Nord – overview
Locating OnePlus Nord – overview
Locating OnePlus Nord – turn
Locating OnePlus Nord – turn
Locating OnePlus Nord – bridge
Locating OnePlus Nord – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
32 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
37 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
48 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord: 35.44 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 51.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord: 12.3 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 19.57 ∆E
550
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 550 cd/m² Médio: 530.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 529 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Apple iPhone SE 2020
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
27%
-13%
-13%
-40%
Brightness middle
529
688
30%
466
-12%
622
18%
625
18%
Brightness
531
659
24%
457
-14%
630
19%
607
14%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
91
-3%
96
2%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.28
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.53
1
60%
2.2
13%
2.7
-7%
4.38
-73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.52
2.2
51%
4.6
-2%
5.9
-31%
6.83
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
2.7
-59%
3
-76%
4.1
-141%
Gamma
2.249 98%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.09 105%
2.251 98%
CCT
6462 101%
6790 96%
6633 98%
6246 104%
7251 90%
Contrast
2457
764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1095 - 1293, n=4)
1218 Points ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (387 - 3310, n=10)
1756 Points ∼100% +41%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1022 - 1187, n=4)
1140 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 3382, n=10)
1697 Points ∼100% +45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
3281 Points ∼100% +67%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼74% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points ∼83% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼53% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=9)
1810 Points ∼55% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼61% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
1336 Points ∼100% +119%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼48% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points ∼55% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼41% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=9)
600 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼43% -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼94% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10093 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼75% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7754 - 9989, n=9)
8494 Points ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=492)
5837 Points ∼58% -38%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼83%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11718 Points ∼89% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=9)
9797 Points ∼75% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=650)
6377 Points ∼49% -41%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼86%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3276 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=9)
2695 Points ∼81% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=151)
2634 Points ∼79% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼78% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5817 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼37% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 3198, n=9)
3123 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=151)
2899 Points ∼50% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼85% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4962 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼46% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3130, n=9)
3006 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=151)
2613 Points ∼53% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2898 Points ∼62% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points ∼95% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3544, n=9)
3186 Points ∼69% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=498)
2175 Points ∼47% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
7847 Points ∼100% +121%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼63% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points ∼91% +101%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3165 - 3589, n=9)
3503 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=498)
2074 Points ∼26% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
5688 Points ∼91% +60%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼77% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼41% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=9)
3409 Points ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=499)
1926 Points ∼31% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4052 Points ∼87% +14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points ∼91% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3555, n=9)
3171 Points ∼68% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=528)
2085 Points ∼45% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
20135 Points ∼100% +276%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼31% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points ∼52% +94%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼18% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4865 - 5437, n=9)
5263 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=528)
2763 Points ∼14% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
10699 Points ∼100% +122%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼55% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points ∼73% +63%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼33% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=9)
4558 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=528)
2322 Points ∼22% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2892 Points ∼67% -17%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼93% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3233 - 3503, n=9)
3350 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=578)
2062 Points ∼48% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4573 Points ∼72% +39%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼76% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼35% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2963 - 3321, n=9)
3237 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=578)
1734 Points ∼27% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
4050 Points ∼71% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼80% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼42% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3015 - 3346, n=9)
3251 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=579)
1658 Points ∼29% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
2857 Points ∼68% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼96% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼76% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3498, n=9)
3162 Points ∼75% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=620)
1925 Points ∼46% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
9218 Points ∼95% +78%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼64% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼36% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4654 - 5832, n=9)
5097 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=619)
2278 Points ∼24% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
6168 Points ∼82% +32%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼74% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼46% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=9)
4430 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=622)
1963 Points ∼26% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
33851 Points ∼81% +61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points ∼96% +91%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18769 - 23203, n=9)
20299 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=768)
15261 Points ∼37% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼33%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
209431 Points ∼100% +202%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼27% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points ∼52% +56%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (62756 - 69645, n=9)
67791 Points ∼32% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=766)
25927 Points ∼12% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼47%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
97290 Points ∼100% +112%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼54% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points ∼81% +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼41% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (42735 - 47824, n=9)
44579 Points ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=766)
20383 Points ∼21% -56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
250 fps ∼100% +158%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼45% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼66% +71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼34% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (86 - 97, n=7)
94 fps ∼38% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼18% -55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼91%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60 - 86, n=7)
66 fps ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼46% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
149 fps ∼100% +171%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼46% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps ∼66% +80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼28% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=7)
53.6 fps ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼17% -53%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (44 - 55, n=7)
49.1 fps ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼36% -56%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼41%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
93 fps ∼100% +145%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼51% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼74% +82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼32% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (33 - 38, n=7)
37 fps ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼22% -45%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼57%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼67% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% +68%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼45% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (29 - 34, n=7)
32.7 fps ∼55% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼32% -44%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼22%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +362%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼28% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼42% +92%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.9 - 13, n=9)
12.2 fps ∼20% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼19% -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼27%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
31 fps ∼100% +265%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼39% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼55% +100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼32% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7.5 - 13, n=9)
8.89 fps ∼29% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼26% -6%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼35%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼43% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 21, n=9)
20.4 fps ∼34% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼28% -21%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼33%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
72 fps ∼100% +200%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼43% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼58% +75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼25% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 24, n=9)
23.3 fps ∼32% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼27% -20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼36%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +181%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼46% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼73% +105%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼29% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (19 - 21, n=7)
20.7 fps ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼24% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼32%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +216%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼38% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% +95%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (16 - 19, n=7)
18.1 fps ∼30% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼21% -34%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
489463 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼75% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points ∼92% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼54% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (279244 - 332074, n=7)
312646 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼64% -5%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
1361 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=7)
1367 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼56% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6754 Points ∼79% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼45% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4697 - 5216, n=7)
5104 Points ∼59% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼28% -53%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4609 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=7)
5094 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼34% -66%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼79%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
8619 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points ∼99% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼75% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6870, n=7)
6637 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼39% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4371 Points ∼90% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼70% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=7)
3921 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼36% -58%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
139.668 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.778 Points ∼46% +9%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼39% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (39.3 - 58.7, n=7)
48.6 Points ∼35% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼33% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼29% -31%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
278.62 Points ∼100% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points ∼40% +19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼35% +2%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (88.5 - 94.8, n=4)
92.8 Points ∼33% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼28% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=601)
46.4 Points ∼17% -51%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
158 runs/min ∼100% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min ∼39% +16%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (45.2 - 54.9, n=5)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼31% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=156)
43.1 runs/min ∼27% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
146 Points ∼100% +45%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼79% +14%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points ∼65% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (72 - 101, n=7)
79.6 Points ∼55% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼53% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼48% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
48991 Points ∼100% +156%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points ∼47% +20%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼40% +3%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (16302 - 19143, n=7)
17967 Points ∼37% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼16% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -249%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼28% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 2835, n=7)
2732 ms * ∼28% +4%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼23% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2138.6 ms * ∼22% +25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020 (Safari Mobile 13.1)
549.9 ms * ∼6% +81%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus NordHuawei P40 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy S10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 8Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
22%
46%
-25%
76%
-1%
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
61.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.4 (66.8 - 73.3, n=3)
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
76.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.5 (76.6 - 82.6, n=3)
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
Random Write 4KB
104.5
249.66
139%
173.54
66%
118.9
14%
203.85
95%
119 (22.1 - 172, n=12)
14%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-68%
Random Read 4KB
126.7
146.07
15%
191.67
51%
106.2
-16%
215
70%
160 (127 - 208, n=12)
26%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
473.1
188.01
-60%
524.56
11%
243.6
-49%
747.87
58%
329 (228 - 473, n=12)
-30%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-74%
Sequential Read 256KB
955.5
905.47
-5%
1488.59
56%
480.5
-50%
1706.7
79%
840 (687 - 967, n=12)
-12%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-65%
Carga Máxima
 45.7 °C42.8 °C40.7 °C 
 45.8 °C43 °C40.3 °C 
 45.2 °C42.7 °C40.5 °C 
Máximo: 45.8 °C
Médio: 43 °C
39 °C40.7 °C42.7 °C
38.9 °C40.7 °C43 °C
39 °C41.2 °C42.7 °C
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.242.4253942.13134.336.54039.339.95042.144.46331.734.48026.32610026.427.112525.631.616022.143.920019.353.225018.958.731516.562.74001668.650014.372.963015.773.980015.273.7100013.777.1125011.776.516001274.5200012.470.3250011.171.9315011.269.7400011.867500012.963.5630013.771.8800014.173.4100001475.8125001366.21600011.452.2SPL6863.425.984.9N22.415.80.864.6median 14median 69.7Delta2.69.440.135.232.929.527.131.330.53033.839.525.923.423.61924.622.520.428.319.542.818.746.617.25216.557.914.462.816.366.715.36714.6701471.714.971.814.274.61575.414.776.714.578.514.380.514.678.615.179.71581.314.975.215.3601649.72788.90.976.2median 15median 701.312.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus NordSamsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.1 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 3.4 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
37%
5%
9%
-4%
-5%
8%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
0.44
76%
0.65
64%
0.58
68%
0.7
61%
1.096 (0.66 - 1.8, n=7)
39%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
51%
Idle Average *
2.1
1.56
26%
2.25
-7%
1.55
26%
1.8
14%
2.16 (1.58 - 2.55, n=7)
-3%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
1.63
29%
2.29
-0%
1.64
29%
2.2
4%
2.42 (1.6 - 2.9, n=7)
-5%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
11%
Load Average *
3.4
2.32
32%
3.7
-9%
4.29
-26%
5.2
-53%
4.42 (3.14 - 6.8, n=7)
-30%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
-20%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.12
21%
6.46
-24%
8.03
-54%
7.5
-44%
6.47 (5.2 - 9.2, n=7)
-24%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 21min
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2020
1822 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
20%
4%
30%
Reader / Idle
2003
1938
-3%
2504
25%
2134
7%
H.264
1064
681
-36%
1183
11%
1423
34%
WiFi v1.3
869
694
-20%
1047
20%
823
-5%
1127
30%
Load
261
143
-45%
222
-15%
387
48%

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Armazenamento enorme
+ Tela de 90 Hz com cores suficientemente precisas
+ Configuração de câmera de alta qualidade e flexível
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Sem afogamentos
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Boas capacidades de localização

Contra

- Sem certificação IP
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Sem Wi-Fi 6
- esempenho pobre da câmera com pouca luz
- Esquenta bastante sob uso intenso

Veredicto – OnePlus cumpre

In review: OnePlus Nord. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany
In review: OnePlus Nord. Test device courtesy of OnePlus Germany

Em nossa análise do OnePlus One, escrevemos que ele tinha uma "excelente relação preço-desempenho, que permanece incomparável".

Agora, cinco anos depois, o OnePlus Nord também possui uma excelente relação preço-desempenho, embora não seja mais incomparável. Isso se deve em grande parte ao fato de que dispositivos mais antigos, que costumavam ser mais caros, como o Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, agora chegaram à faixa de preços do OnePlus Nord.

Considerando os preços de lançamento de outros dispositivos, o OnePlus Nord é certamente impressionante: Com 5G, Wi-Fi rápido, muito armazenamento, um SoC rápido, câmeras boas e flexíveis, além de uma carcaça elegante e robusta, estabeleceu um novo padrão para futuros dispositivos de gama média.

Quase não temos críticas: A tela poderia ser um pouco mais brilhante, a câmera só funciona bem em situações de pouca luz quando o modo paisagem noturna está ativado e o dispositivo pode ficar bastante quente.

O OnePlus Nord cumpre suas próprias aspirações: Com ele, o fabricante volta às suas raízes e vende um ótimo smartphone a um preço barato.

Os usuários que frequentemente usam aplicativos muito exigentes ou executam várias tarefas em segundo plano enquanto outros aplicativos exigentes estão em execução poderão notar uma desvantagem de desempenho em comparação com telefones carros-chefes mais caros. Além disso, faltam alguns recursos comumente encontrados em carros-chefes, como carregamento sem fio, Wi-Fi 6 ou suporte para velocidades LTE extremamente altas.

No entanto, ainda é um smartphone excelente e barato para quem deseja aceitar esses pequenos compromissos.

OnePlus Nord - 07/25/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
47 / 70 → 67%
Peso
89%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
36 / 64 → 57%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
71%
Médio
77%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve análise do Smartphone OnePlus Nord – Retorno do Campeão do Valor?
Florian Schmitt, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 2)