Revisão da Razer Blade 15 OLED (início de 2022): Um laptop compacto para jogos com um RTX 3070 Ti

Re-polido. A atual encarnação da Lâmina 15 continua a depender das ferragens potentes do Alder Lake e Ampere, mas também oferece uma atualização sedutora: A Razer optou por um visor OLED de alto contraste (QHD) completo com alta taxa de atualização (240 Hz) e excelente cobertura de espaço de cor.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/10/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

A Razer Blade 15 (início de 2022) tem ambições de ser um laptop tanto para os jogadores quanto para os usuários criativos. O hardware adequado está a bordo: Núcleo i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU laptop e um visor OLED (QHD) colorido e preciso. Concorrentes compactos similares podem ser encontrados na forma do Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (meados de 22)oAorus 15 XE5oHP Omen 16e oAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informações sobre o estojo, características, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes já estão à disposição em nossa revisão de seu irmão, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Este último está equipado com um painel LED (QHD) - a diferença mais relevante em relação ao dispositivo atual.

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1035 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, Brilhante: sim, 240 Hz

placa mãe

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB livre

Conexões

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235

Bateria

80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.01 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g

Preço

3249 Euro

Links

Razer página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.8 %	02/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 %	12/2022	Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
87.4 %	08/2022	Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.65 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
85.5 %	05/2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440

Comparação de tamanho

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Aorus 15 XE5 Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Lado direito: Leitor de cartão de memória (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot para um trava de cabo

Lado esquerdo: Conector de energia, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de áudio combinado

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	138.1 (127.28^min - 140.64^max) MB/s ∼83% +71%
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=89, last 2 years)	107.2 MB/s ∼65% +33%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s ∼47% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s ∼36% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	261.31 MB/s ∼100% +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s ∼70% +116%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 269, n=79, last 2 years)	131.2 MB/s ∼50% +56%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s ∼32%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1528 (1341^min - 1654^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1160 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years)	1152 MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022	1470 (1448^min - 1522^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1470 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years)	1174 MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1692 (1588^min - 1709^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1664 (1336^min - 1741^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1550^min - 1681^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=4)	1601 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=33, last 2 years)	1554 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1564^min - 1655^max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1612 (817^min - 1646^max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=69, last 2 years)	1461 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=7)	1448 MBit/s ∼89% -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s ∼60% -35%

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Display - O computador móvel Razer traz junto um painel OLED

O visor OLED oferece os mesmos dados-chave que o seu irmão-irmão do visor LED: Uma resolução de 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) a uma taxa de atualização de 240 Hz e 15,6 polegadas de diâmetro.

Típico para OLEDs, o painel marca pontos para maravilhosos níveis de preto e tempos de resposta rápidos. Além disso, isto é acompanhado por um brilho máximo relativamente alto. Isto é algo a que sua contraparte LED não consegue segurar uma chama.

Os pontos fracos do painel OLED: Ele tem uma superfície brilhante e cintila a um ajuste de brilho de ≤ 70% a uma freqüência de 500 Hz. A cintilação tecnicamente induzida está ligada à regulação de luminosidade do painel. A este respeito, de seus irmãos painel LED mate e sem cintilação tem seu nariz na frente.


385 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	387 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Samsung ATNA562P02-0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 381 cd/m²
Contraste: 12767:1 (Preto: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display		-6%	-4%	-20%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	97.6	92.8 -5%	95.2 -2%	67.3 -31%	71 -27%	99.1 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	98.5 -1%	99.9 1%	96.7 -3%	97.9 -2%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94	83.1 -12%	84.5 -10%	68.2 -27%	73.3 -22%	86.8 -8%
Response Times		-340%	-475%	-365%	-498%	-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) -280%	14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5) -620%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -625%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -620%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	10 ?(4.6, 5.4) -400%	8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5) -330%	7 ?(3.3, 3.7) -250%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) -370%	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -480%
PWM Frequency	500 ?(70)
Screen		-96%	-169%	-178%	-184%	-106%
Brightness middle	383	497 30%	336 -12%	326 -15%	335 -13%	286 -25%
Brightness	384	481 25%	316 -18%	303 -21%	319 -17%	271 -29%
Brightness Distribution	99	82 -17%	89 -10%	89 -10%	90 -9%	89 -10%
Black Level *	0.03	0.21 -600%	0.34 -1033%	0.33 -1000%	0.28 -833%	0.25 -733%
Contrast	12767	2367 -81%	988 -92%	988 -92%	1196 -91%	1144 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	3.53 -87%	3.36 -78%	2.73 -44%	4.38 -132%	2.74 -45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.76	6.15 -64%	6.67 -77%	9.54 -154%	9.48 -152%	5.21 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.67	3.53 -32%	0.74 72%	1.36 49%	1.33 50%	2.52 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.26	1.74 -38%	4.7 -273%	5.2 -313%	7 -456%	1.1 13%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.2 ^100%	2.244 ^98%	2.074 ^106%	2.103 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6386 ^102%	6418 ^101%	6897 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6244 ^104%	6408 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-147% / -112%	-216% / -177%	-188% / -171%	-233% / -193%	-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Mesmo fora da caixa, o display proporciona uma reprodução de cores impressionante: Com um desvio de 1,9, o alvo (DeltaE < 3) é claramente alcançado. A calibração não leva a nenhuma melhoria. A precisão das cores é dada: Os espaços de cor sRGB e DCI-P3 são reproduzidos completa e quase completamente com o espaço de cor AdobeRGB a 94 por cento. O painel de LED do irmão também proporciona resultados igualmente bons.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

500 Hz

≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

O painel vem com grande estabilidade de ângulo de visão e é legível de todos os ângulos. Entretanto, ao ar livre, isto é difícil devido à superfície brilhante e refletiva da tela.

Performance - Blade 15 é baseado em Alder Lake e Ampere

Com o Blade 15 (início de 2022), a Razer tem um laptop em sua linha de produtos projetado para jogos QHD (de alta a máxima configuração), mas também corta uma bela figura em áreas como edição e renderização de vídeo. O modelo revisado aqui pode ser obtido por cerca de US$ 1.967.

Condições de teste

É possível alternar entre os três modos de desempenho ("Balanceado", "Silencioso" e "Definido pelo usuário") usando a combinação de teclas "Fn" + "P". O perfil "Definido pelo usuário" permite configurações de subpressões para a CPU ("Baixa", "Média", "Alta", "Boost") e GPU ("Baixa", "Média", e "Alta") - via software Razer Synapse pré-instalado. No modo de bateria, somente o perfil "Balanceado" está disponível.

Os benchmarks foram realizados utilizando o modo "User-defined" ativo em configurações máximas (subpresets "Boost" e "High"). Para o teste de bateria, foi utilizado o perfil "Silencioso".

Processador

ONúcleo i9-12900H(Alder Lake) consiste em seis núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,5 a 5 GHz) e oito núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,8 a 3,8 GHz). No total, existem 20 núcleos lógicos de CPU.

O teste de benchmark Cinebench R15 multi-thread foi processado em 3,6 a 3,8 GHz (P-cores) e 2,8 a 2,9 GHz (E-cores). Fizemos o teste de rosca única em 1,4 a 4,5 GHz (P-cores) e 1,5 a 3,5 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente. No modo de bateria, as velocidades do relógio são mais baixas. O teste de loop CB15 mostra: A carga multi-tarefa só é confrontada com a alta velocidade do relógio turbo por um curto período de tempo. Após 30 a 40 segundos, os valores caem para aproximadamente a velocidade do relógio de base.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)

Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o ciclo CB15 (Max)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do ciclo CB15 (Equilibrado)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	83.1 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	78.1 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	74.8 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	74.7 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming	71.9 pt ∼72%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	57.9 pt ∼58%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16170 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22)	15902 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	15870 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=224, last 2 years)	15208 Points ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	10742 Points ∼66% -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1871 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22)	1838 Points ∼98% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points ∼96% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1759 Points ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=221, last 2 years)	1631 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1515 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6053 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	6044 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22)	5985 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=227, last 2 years)	5733 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	4148 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	715 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22)	712 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points ∼97% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	683 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=227, last 2 years)	629 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points ∼81% -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	2711 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	2586 (2431.02^min - 2585.82^max) Points ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22)	2578 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=232, last 2 years)	2447 Points ∼87% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points ∼77% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1547 Points ∼55% -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23)	264 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	263 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=228, last 2 years)	246 Points ∼93% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	229 Points ∼87% -8%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	309 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)	245 Seconds * ∼79% -11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	236 Seconds * ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * ∼73% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22)	215 Seconds * ∼70% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	195 Seconds * ∼63% +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * ∼59% +17%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	66057 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22)	63631 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=224, last 2 years)	62051 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	58296 MIPS ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47298 MIPS ∼65% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	6192 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22)	5869 MIPS ∼95% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS ∼95% +9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	5739 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=225, last 2 years)	5719 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	5492 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS ∼87%

Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	12832 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	12753 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23)	12461 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=223, last 2 years)	10877 Points ∼81% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	8261 Points ∼61% -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	1841 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23)	1815 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points ∼95% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	1728 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=223, last 2 years)	1643 Points ∼89% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	1579 Points ∼86% -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps ∼95% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)	18.1 fps ∼91% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=229, last 2 years)	17.3 fps ∼87% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps ∼86% -1%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.2 fps ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	12.8 fps ∼64% -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=225, last 2 years)	51.4 s * ∼100% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s * ∼92% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22)	43.3 s * ∼84% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	42.2 s * ∼82% +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * ∼80% +19%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	37.5 s * ∼73% +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.557 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Gaming (0.3793 - 4.47, n=225, last 2 years)	0.516 sec * ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * ∼85% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4647 sec * ∼83% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * ∼81% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)	0.4486 sec * ∼81% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4352 sec * ∼78% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2543 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

213 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.3 pt ∼95%
Average of class Gaming	88.7 pt ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88.3 pt ∼88%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.3 pt ∼83%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	82.5 pt ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H	79.8 pt ∼80%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	69.7 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.5 pt ∼67%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	15387 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=197, last 2 years)	13910 KRay/s ∼90% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12736 KRay/s ∼83% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	12680 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22)	11115 KRay/s ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	74919 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=197, last 2 years)	74033 Points ∼99% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63698 Points ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61649 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22)	54800 Points ∼73% -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points ∼49% -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points ∼48% -50%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4107 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3545 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=197, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s ∼85% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22)	3158 MB/s ∼77% -7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3023 MB/s ∼74% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s ∼65% -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s ∼65% -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105420 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22)	103601 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102811 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=197, last 2 years)	98622 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86848 Points ∼82% -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=197, last 2 years)	10842 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9538 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22)	9371 Points ∼86% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points ∼85% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points ∼85% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	8872 Points ∼82% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8654 Points ∼80% -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=197, last 2 years)	39920 Points ∼100% +17%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37197 Points ∼93% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36496 Points ∼91% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points ∼85%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	31084 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22)	28698 Points ∼72% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points ∼53% -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points ∼53% -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135380 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	128492 MB/s ∼95% +30%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113172 MB/s ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=197, last 2 years)	102934 MB/s ∼76% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22)	90046 MB/s ∼67% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s ∼63% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s ∼41% -44%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	993 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22)	974 MB/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=218, last 2 years)	878 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	860 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	690 MB/s ∼65% -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8316 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=197, last 2 years)	7561 KRay/s ∼91% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6946 KRay/s ∼84% -4%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	6843 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22)	6214 KRay/s ∼75% -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s ∼50% -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42574 MPixel/s ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s ∼96% +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s ∼96% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23)	36969 MPixel/s ∼87% +7%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	35065 MPixel/s ∼82% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s ∼81% -1%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=198, last 2 years)	29812 MPixel/s ∼70% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	26692 MPixel/s ∼63% -23%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema funciona de forma suave e confiável e fornece energia suficiente para áreas de aplicação exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a memória DDR5-4800 e isto é complementado por bons resultados PC-Mark.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7871 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6)	7712 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7695 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=186, last 2 years)	7160 Points ∼91% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6126 Points ∼78% -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10936 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6)	10807 Points ∼99% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10764 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=185, last 2 years)	10366 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points ∼94%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9544 Points ∼87% -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10352 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10187 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6)	10153 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=185, last 2 years)	9348 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8571 Points ∼83% -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11881 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6)	11364 Points ∼94% +10%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11099 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points ∼90% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=185, last 2 years)	10326 Points ∼85% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7627 Points ∼63% -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1947 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1884 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6)	1871 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=94, last 2 years)	1822 Points ∼94% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1656 Points ∼85% -4%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1887 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1797 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6)	1784 Points ∼95% +9%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=94, last 2 years)	1750 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1640 Points ∼87% 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6)	2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1983 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=94, last 2 years)	1954 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1692 Points ∼84% -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2022 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1803 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6)	1759 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=94, last 2 years)	1686 Points ∼83% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1600 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points ∼78%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5101 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5789 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		7336 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63157 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22)	58799 MB/s ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=197, last 2 years)	50607 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	50524 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48120 MB/s ∼76% -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	67051 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s ∼98% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22)	61346 MB/s ∼91% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57551 MB/s ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=197, last 2 years)	54253 MB/s ∼81% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	48849 MB/s ∼73% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66275 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22)	58343 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58294 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=197, last 2 years)	51593 MB/s ∼78% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46056 MB/s ∼69% -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95.1 ns * ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * ∼91% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88 ns * ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21)	85 ns * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=218, last 2 years)	69.4 ns * ∼70% +30%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste de monitor de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de vídeo 4k, Prime95 de alta carga) revelou anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou deteriorações no desempenho.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3261 μs * ∼100% -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * ∼42% -46%
Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1109.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.7 μs * ∼29% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * ∼29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * ∼22% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

A lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs PCIe-4 no formato M.2 2280. O SSD PCIe-4 instalado (1 TB) da Samsung oferece taxas de transferência muito boas. As quedas no desempenho devido ao estrangulamento térmico não estavam presentes.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	91.4 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	83.8 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	78.5 pt ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.8 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt ∼76%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming	62.5 pt ∼63%

DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4199 (4194.93^min - 4199.13^max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4117 (3552.16^min - 4116.81^max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s ∼94% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3764 (3540.2^min - 3763.76^max) MB/s ∼90% +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4634, n=50)	3713 MB/s ∼88% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 5676, n=184, last 2 years)	3097 MB/s ∼74% -13%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4767 (4365.51^min - 4766.62^max) MB/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4299 (4288.86^min - 4298.95^max) MB/s ∼90% +22%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4236 (3477.46^min - 4236.46^max) MB/s ∼89% +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s ∼87% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s ∼85% +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 4516, n=50)	3557 MB/s ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼74%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 7889, n=183, last 2 years)	3288 MB/s ∼69% -7%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7020 (5888.98^min - 7020.02^max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6847 (6590.72^min - 6846.78^max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6550 (5497.59^min - 6549.73^max) MB/s ∼93% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7061, n=50)	6371 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 13195, n=184, last 2 years)	5364 MB/s ∼76% -19%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4999 (4982.73^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4876 (4374.87^min - 4876.3^max) MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2226 - 5259, n=50)	4815 MB/s ∼89% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s ∼88% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4421 (4173.33^min - 4420.8^max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 10261, n=184, last 2 years)	4026 MB/s ∼74% -19%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.6 (67.84^min - 80.61^max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	77.9 (77.66^min - 77.9^max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.7 - 97.4, n=50)	77.7 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.3 (71.59^min - 74.33^max) MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=184, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s ∼80% -20%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	333 (331.94^min - 333.25^max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	264 (263.57^min - 264.44^max) MB/s ∼79% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s ∼77% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	239 (238.19^min - 238.82^max) MB/s ∼72% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s ∼62% -3%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=183, last 2 years)	203 MB/s ∼61% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 275, n=50)	190.4 MB/s ∼57% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4309 (4179.96^min - 4309.38^max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3566 (3562.85^min - 3566.11^max) MB/s ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 (2482.75^min - 2854.87^max) MB/s ∼66% -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=50)	2486 MB/s ∼58% -40%
Average of class Gaming (310 - 5829, n=183, last 2 years)	2312 MB/s ∼54% -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s ∼35% -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3600 (3594.9^min - 3599.81^max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3435 (2876.62^min - 3435.27^max) MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2694 (2561.51^min - 2693.92^max) MB/s ∼75% -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4383, n=183, last 2 years)	2026 MB/s ∼56% -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=50)	1860 MB/s ∼52% -47%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s ∼16% -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9117 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	8376 Points ∼92% +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7659 Points ∼84% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6864 Points ∼75% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=52)	6780 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Gaming (910 - 10330, n=174, last 2 years)	6237 Points ∼68% -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points ∼66% -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 Points ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3431 Points ∼96% +20%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3123 Points ∼87% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2562 Points ∼72% -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=52)	2417 Points ∼68% -15%
Average of class Gaming (389 - 3629, n=174, last 2 years)	2327 Points ∼65% -19%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit comparado com
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2518
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	2533
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2535
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2543
Huawei MateBook 16s i7 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2545
i5-12600K, NVIDIA Titan RTX	2555
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2563
...
(max) TR Pro 3995WX, Radeon Pro W6800	9706