Revisão da Razer Blade 15 OLED (início de 2022): Um laptop compacto para jogos com um RTX 3070 Ti

A Razer Blade 15 (início de 2022) tem ambições de ser um laptop tanto para os jogadores quanto para os usuários criativos. O hardware adequado está a bordo: Núcleo i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU laptop e um visor OLED (QHD) colorido e preciso. Concorrentes compactos similares podem ser encontrados na forma do Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (meados de 22)oAorus 15 XE5oHP Omen 16e oAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.
Informações sobre o estojo, características, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes já estão à disposição em nossa revisão de seu irmão, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Este último está equipado com um painel LED (QHD) - a diferença mais relevante em relação ao dispositivo atual.
Possíveis concorrentes em comparação
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.8 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % | 12/2022 | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.4 % | 08/2022 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 21.65 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85.5 % | 05/2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (18.5 - 222, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 269, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=33, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=7) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |

Display - O computador móvel Razer traz junto um painel OLED
O visor OLED oferece os mesmos dados-chave que o seu irmão-irmão do visor LED: Uma resolução de 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) a uma taxa de atualização de 240 Hz e 15,6 polegadas de diâmetro.
Típico para OLEDs, o painel marca pontos para maravilhosos níveis de preto e tempos de resposta rápidos. Além disso, isto é acompanhado por um brilho máximo relativamente alto. Isto é algo a que sua contraparte LED não consegue segurar uma chama.
Os pontos fracos do painel OLED: Ele tem uma superfície brilhante e cintila a um ajuste de brilho de ≤ 70% a uma freqüência de 500 Hz. A cintilação tecnicamente induzida está ligada à regulação de luminosidade do painel. A este respeito, de seus irmãos painel LED mate e sem cintilação tem seu nariz na frente.
|
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 381 cd/m²
Contraste: 12767:1 (Preto: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -4% | -20% | -17% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 92.8 -5% | 95.2 -2% | 67.3 -31% | 71 -27% | 99.1 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 1% | 96.7 -3% | 97.9 -2% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94 | 83.1 -12% | 84.5 -10% | 68.2 -27% | 73.3 -22% | 86.8 -8% |
Response Times | -340% | -475% | -365% | -498% | -550% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 7.6 ? -280% | 14.4 ? -620% | 11.6 ? -480% | 14.5 ? -625% | 14.4 ? -620% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 10 ? -400% | 8.6 ? -330% | 7 ? -250% | 9.4 ? -370% | 11.6 ? -480% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | |||||
Screen | -96% | -169% | -178% | -184% | -106% | |
Brightness middle | 383 | 497 30% | 336 -12% | 326 -15% | 335 -13% | 286 -25% |
Brightness | 384 | 481 25% | 316 -18% | 303 -21% | 319 -17% | 271 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 82 -17% | 89 -10% | 89 -10% | 90 -9% | 89 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.21 -600% | 0.34 -1033% | 0.33 -1000% | 0.28 -833% | 0.25 -733% |
Contrast | 12767 | 2367 -81% | 988 -92% | 988 -92% | 1196 -91% | 1144 -91% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 3.53 -87% | 3.36 -78% | 2.73 -44% | 4.38 -132% | 2.74 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.76 | 6.15 -64% | 6.67 -77% | 9.54 -154% | 9.48 -152% | 5.21 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.67 | 3.53 -32% | 0.74 72% | 1.36 49% | 1.33 50% | 2.52 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 1.74 -38% | 4.7 -273% | 5.2 -313% | 7 -456% | 1.1 13% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.244 98% | 2.074 106% | 2.103 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6386 102% | 6418 101% | 6897 94% | 6911 94% | 6244 104% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -147% /
-112% | -216% /
-177% | -188% /
-171% | -233% /
-193% | -219% /
-147% |
* ... smaller is better
Mesmo fora da caixa, o display proporciona uma reprodução de cores impressionante: Com um desvio de 1,9, o alvo (DeltaE < 3) é claramente alcançado. A calibração não leva a nenhuma melhoria. A precisão das cores é dada: Os espaços de cor sRGB e DCI-P3 são reproduzidos completa e quase completamente com o espaço de cor AdobeRGB a 94 por cento. O painel de LED do irmão também proporciona resultados igualmente bons.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Blade 15 é baseado em Alder Lake e Ampere
Com o Blade 15 (início de 2022), a Razer tem um laptop em sua linha de produtos projetado para jogos QHD (de alta a máxima configuração), mas também corta uma bela figura em áreas como edição e renderização de vídeo. O modelo revisado aqui pode ser obtido por cerca de US$ 1.967.
Condições de teste
É possível alternar entre os três modos de desempenho ("Balanceado", "Silencioso" e "Definido pelo usuário") usando a combinação de teclas "Fn" + "P". O perfil "Definido pelo usuário" permite configurações de subpressões para a CPU ("Baixa", "Média", "Alta", "Boost") e GPU ("Baixa", "Média", e "Alta") - via software Razer Synapse pré-instalado. No modo de bateria, somente o perfil "Balanceado" está disponível.
Os benchmarks foram realizados utilizando o modo "User-defined" ativo em configurações máximas (subpresets "Boost" e "High"). Para o teste de bateria, foi utilizado o perfil "Silencioso".
Processador
ONúcleo i9-12900H(Alder Lake) consiste em seis núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,5 a 5 GHz) e oito núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,8 a 3,8 GHz). No total, existem 20 núcleos lógicos de CPU.
O teste de benchmark Cinebench R15 multi-thread foi processado em 3,6 a 3,8 GHz (P-cores) e 2,8 a 2,9 GHz (E-cores). Fizemos o teste de rosca única em 1,4 a 4,5 GHz (P-cores) e 1,5 a 3,5 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente. No modo de bateria, as velocidades do relógio são mais baixas. O teste de loop CB15 mostra: A carga multi-tarefa só é confrontada com a alta velocidade do relógio turbo por um curto período de tempo. Após 30 a 40 segundos, os valores caem para aproximadamente a velocidade do relógio de base.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=221, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13457, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5554, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (93 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 135927, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7332, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 21853, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 34.8, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3793 - 4.47, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 52479, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 227882, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 8525, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 180473, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 29598, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 118401, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2090, n=218, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 28105, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 51096, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Desempenho do sistema
O sistema funciona de forma suave e confiável e fornece energia suficiente para áreas de aplicação exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a memória DDR5-4800 e isto é complementado por bons resultados PC-Mark.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12639, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2195, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5101 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5789 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7336 pontos | |
Ajuda |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 78835, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 86294, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=218, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
Latências DPC
O teste de monitor de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de vídeo 4k, Prime95 de alta carga) revelou anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou deteriorações no desempenho.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
* ... smaller is better
Armazenamento em massa
AS SSD | |
Score Total | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=52) | |
Average of class Gaming (910 - 10330, n=174, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Score Read | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=52) | |
Average of class Gaming (389 - 3629, n=174, last 2 years) |