Notebookcheck Logo

Revisão da Razer Blade 15 OLED (início de 2022): Um laptop compacto para jogos com um RTX 3070 Ti

Re-polido. A atual encarnação da Lâmina 15 continua a depender das ferragens potentes do Alder Lake e Ampere, mas também oferece uma atualização sedutora: A Razer optou por um visor OLED de alto contraste (QHD) completo com alta taxa de atualização (240 Hz) e excelente cobertura de espaço de cor.

A Razer Blade 15 (início de 2022) tem ambições de ser um laptop tanto para os jogadores quanto para os usuários criativos. O hardware adequado está a bordo: Núcleo i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU laptop e um visor OLED (QHD) colorido e preciso. Concorrentes compactos similares podem ser encontrados na forma do Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (meados de 22)oAorus 15 XE5oHP Omen 16e oAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informações sobre o estojo, características, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes já estão à disposição em nossa revisão de seu irmão, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Este último está equipado com um painel LED (QHD) - a diferença mais relevante em relação ao dispositivo atual.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1035 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, Brilhante: sim, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB livre
Conexões
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235
Bateria
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.01 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g
Preço
3249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.9 %
03/2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
12/2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
08/2022
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Comparação de tamanho

369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 244 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão de memória (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot para um trava de cabo
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão de memória (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot para um trava de cabo
Lado esquerdo: Conector de energia, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de áudio combinado
Lado esquerdo: Conector de energia, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de áudio combinado
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s ∼83% +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.5 - 222, n=89, last 2 years)
107.2 MB/s ∼65% +33%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼47% -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s ∼36% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s ∼100% +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼70% +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 269, n=79, last 2 years)
131.2 MB/s ∼50% +56%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s ∼32%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1160 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1588, n=84, last 2 years)
1152 MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1470 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=84, last 2 years)
1174 MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1692 (1588min - 1709max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1465 - 1762, n=4)
1601 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (886 - 1857, n=33, last 2 years)
1554 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=69, last 2 years)
1461 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=7)
1448 MBit/s ∼89% -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s ∼60% -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Display - O computador móvel Razer traz junto um painel OLED

Pixelraster
Pixel raster

O visor OLED oferece os mesmos dados-chave que o seu irmão-irmão do visor LED: Uma resolução de 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) a uma taxa de atualização de 240 Hz e 15,6 polegadas de diâmetro.

Típico para OLEDs, o painel marca pontos para maravilhosos níveis de preto e tempos de resposta rápidos. Além disso, isto é acompanhado por um brilho máximo relativamente alto. Isto é algo a que sua contraparte LED não consegue segurar uma chama.

Os pontos fracos do painel OLED: Ele tem uma superfície brilhante e cintila a um ajuste de brilho de ≤ 70% a uma freqüência de 500 Hz. A cintilação tecnicamente induzida está ligada à regulação de luminosidade do painel. A este respeito, de seus irmãos painel LED mate e sem cintilação tem seu nariz na frente.

385
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Samsung ATNA562P02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 381 cd/m²
Contraste: 12767:1 (Preto: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-6%
-4%
-20%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
92.8
-5%
95.2
-2%
67.3
-31%
71
-27%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.5
-1%
99.9
1%
96.7
-3%
97.9
-2%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94
83.1
-12%
84.5
-10%
68.2
-27%
73.3
-22%
86.8
-8%
Response Times
-340%
-475%
-365%
-498%
-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
-280%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-620%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-625%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-620%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
-400%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
-330%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
-250%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-370%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
-96%
-169%
-178%
-184%
-106%
Brightness middle
383
497
30%
336
-12%
326
-15%
335
-13%
286
-25%
Brightness
384
481
25%
316
-18%
303
-21%
319
-17%
271
-29%
Brightness Distribution
99
82
-17%
89
-10%
89
-10%
90
-9%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.34
-1033%
0.33
-1000%
0.28
-833%
0.25
-733%
Contrast
12767
2367
-81%
988
-92%
988
-92%
1196
-91%
1144
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
3.53
-87%
3.36
-78%
2.73
-44%
4.38
-132%
2.74
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.76
6.15
-64%
6.67
-77%
9.54
-154%
9.48
-152%
5.21
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.67
3.53
-32%
0.74
72%
1.36
49%
1.33
50%
2.52
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
1.74
-38%
4.7
-273%
5.2
-313%
7
-456%
1.1
13%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.103 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6386 102%
6418 101%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6244 104%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-147% / -112%
-216% / -177%
-188% / -171%
-233% / -193%
-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Mesmo fora da caixa, o display proporciona uma reprodução de cores impressionante: Com um desvio de 1,9, o alvo (DeltaE < 3) é claramente alcançado. A calibração não leva a nenhuma melhoria. A precisão das cores é dada: Os espaços de cor sRGB e DCI-P3 são reproduzidos completa e quase completamente com o espaço de cor AdobeRGB a 94 por cento. O painel de LED do irmão também proporciona resultados igualmente bons.

CalMAN - Verificador de cores
CalMAN - Verificador de cores
CalMAN - Escamas de cinza
CalMAN - Escamas de cinza
CalMAN - Saturação de cores
CalMAN - Saturação de cores
Lâmina vs. AdobeRGB
Lâmina vs. AdobeRGB
Lâmina vs. DCI P3
Lâmina vs. DCI P3
Lâmina vs. sRGB
Lâmina vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

O painel vem com grande estabilidade de ângulo de visão e é legível de todos os ângulos. Entretanto, ao ar livre, isto é difícil devido à superfície brilhante e refletiva da tela.

A Lâmina ao ar livre
A Lâmina ao ar livre
Ângulo de visão
Ângulo de visão

Performance - Blade 15 é baseado em Alder Lake e Ampere

Com o Blade 15 (início de 2022), a Razer tem um laptop em sua linha de produtos projetado para jogos QHD (de alta a máxima configuração), mas também corta uma bela figura em áreas como edição e renderização de vídeo. O modelo revisado aqui pode ser obtido por cerca de US$ 1.967.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Systeminfo

Condições de teste

É possível alternar entre os três modos de desempenho ("Balanceado", "Silencioso" e "Definido pelo usuário") usando a combinação de teclas "Fn" + "P". O perfil "Definido pelo usuário" permite configurações de subpressões para a CPU ("Baixa", "Média", "Alta", "Boost") e GPU ("Baixa", "Média", e "Alta") - via software Razer Synapse pré-instalado. No modo de bateria, somente o perfil "Balanceado" está disponível.

Os benchmarks foram realizados utilizando o modo "User-defined" ativo em configurações máximas (subpresets "Boost" e "High"). Para o teste de bateria, foi utilizado o perfil "Silencioso".

Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse

Processador

ONúcleo i9-12900H(Alder Lake) consiste em seis núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,5 a 5 GHz) e oito núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,8 a 3,8 GHz). No total, existem 20 núcleos lógicos de CPU.

O teste de benchmark Cinebench R15 multi-thread foi processado em 3,6 a 3,8 GHz (P-cores) e 2,8 a 2,9 GHz (E-cores). Fizemos o teste de rosca única em 1,4 a 4,5 GHz (P-cores) e 1,5 a 3,5 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente. No modo de bateria, as velocidades do relógio são mais baixas. O teste de loop CB15 mostra: A carga multi-tarefa só é confrontada com a alta velocidade do relógio turbo por um curto período de tempo. Após 30 a 40 segundos, os valores caem para aproximadamente a velocidade do relógio de base.

Multifios (potência da parede)
Multifios (potência da parede)
Rosca única (potência da parede)
Rosca única (potência da parede)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o ciclo CB15 (Max)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o ciclo CB15 (Max)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do ciclo CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do ciclo CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.1 pt ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
81.8 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
78.1 pt ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
74.8 pt ∼75%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
74.7 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
 
71.9 pt ∼72%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.9 pt ∼58%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points ∼99% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7647 - 19648, n=22)
15902 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34521, n=224, last 2 years)
15208 Points ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points ∼66% -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1698 - 1921, n=22)
1838 Points ∼98% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points ∼96% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼96% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points ∼94% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2169, n=221, last 2 years)
1631 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points ∼81% -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2922 - 7471, n=22)
5985 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13457, n=227, last 2 years)
5733 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (653 - 738, n=22)
712 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼97% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 825, n=227, last 2 years)
629 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points ∼81% -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1561 - 3077, n=22)
2578 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5554, n=232, last 2 years)
2447 Points ∼87% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼77% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points ∼55% -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (243 - 277, n=23)
264 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼97% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 312, n=228, last 2 years)
246 Points ∼93% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼87% -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (93 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
245 Seconds * ∼79% -11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼73% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds * ∼71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 415, n=22)
215 Seconds * ∼70% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * ∼63% +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * ∼59% +17%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (37614 - 76677, n=22)
63631 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 135927, n=224, last 2 years)
62051 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS ∼65% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=22)
5869 MIPS ∼95% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS ∼95% +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7332, n=225, last 2 years)
5719 MIPS ∼92% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS ∼87%
Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=23)
12461 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 21853, n=223, last 2 years)
10877 Points ∼81% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points ∼61% -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1647 - 1892, n=23)
1815 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points ∼98% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼95% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points ∼94% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2139, n=223, last 2 years)
1643 Points ∼89% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points ∼86% -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps ∼95% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (9.16 - 22.5, n=22)
18.1 fps ∼91% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 34.8, n=229, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼87% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼86% -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps ∼64% -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=225, last 2 years)
51.4 s * ∼100% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s * ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼92% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (38 - 59.8, n=22)
43.3 s * ∼84% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * ∼82% +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * ∼80% +19%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * ∼73% +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3793 - 4.47, n=225, last 2 years)
0.516 sec * ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec * ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼85% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * ∼83% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * ∼81% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22)
0.4486 sec * ∼81% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * ∼78% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2543 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
213 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.3 pt ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
 
88.7 pt ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.3 pt ∼88%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.3 pt ∼83%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.5 pt ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
79.8 pt ∼80%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
69.7 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.5 pt ∼67%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 52479, n=197, last 2 years)
13910 KRay/s ∼90% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s ∼88%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s ∼83% -6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=22)
11115 KRay/s ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 227882, n=197, last 2 years)
74033 Points ∼99% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points ∼85% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=22)
54800 Points ∼73% -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼49% -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points ∼48% -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s ∼100% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s ∼86% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 8525, n=197, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s ∼85% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=22)
3158 MB/s ∼77% -7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s ∼74% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼65% -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s ∼65% -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78668 - 111241, n=22)
103601 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 180473, n=197, last 2 years)
98622 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points ∼82% -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 29598, n=197, last 2 years)
10842 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=22)
9371 Points ∼86% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points ∼85% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼85% -5%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points ∼82% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points ∼80% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 118401, n=197, last 2 years)
39920 Points ∼100% +17%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points ∼93% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points ∼91% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points ∼85%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=22)
28698 Points ∼72% -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼53% -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points ∼53% -38%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s ∼95% +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 236139, n=197, last 2 years)
102934 MB/s ∼76% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=22)
90046 MB/s ∼67% -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s ∼63% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼41% -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=22)
974 MB/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2090, n=218, last 2 years)
878 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s ∼65% -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s ∼100% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 28105, n=197, last 2 years)
7561 KRay/s ∼91% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s ∼84% -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=22)
6214 KRay/s ∼75% -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼50% -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼96% +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s ∼96% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=23)
36969 MPixel/s ∼87% +7%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s ∼82% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s ∼81% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 51096, n=198, last 2 years)
29812 MPixel/s ∼70% -14%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s ∼63% -23%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema funciona de forma suave e confiável e fornece energia suficiente para áreas de aplicação exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a memória DDR5-4800 e isto é complementado por bons resultados PC-Mark.

A RAM funciona em modo de canal duplo.
A RAM funciona em modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 9331, n=186, last 2 years)
7160 Points ∼91% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points ∼78% -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points ∼99% +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 12639, n=185, last 2 years)
10366 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points ∼94%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points ∼87% -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 11833, n=185, last 2 years)
9348 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points ∼83% -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points ∼94% +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points ∼90% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (5288 - 16424, n=185, last 2 years)
10326 Points ∼85% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points ∼63% -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points ∼96% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2195, n=94, last 2 years)
1822 Points ∼94% +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points ∼89%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points ∼85% -4%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points ∼95% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=94, last 2 years)
1750 Points ∼93% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points ∼87% 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2514, n=94, last 2 years)
1954 Points ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points ∼84% -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=94, last 2 years)
1686 Points ∼83% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points ∼78%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5789 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
7336 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼99% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=22)
58799 MB/s ∼93% +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 78835, n=197, last 2 years)
50607 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s ∼80% -9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s ∼76% -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼98% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=22)
61346 MB/s ∼91% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 86294, n=197, last 2 years)
54253 MB/s ∼81% -12%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s ∼73% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s ∼97% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 66275, n=22)
58343 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 80441, n=197, last 2 years)
51593 MB/s ∼78% -11%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s ∼69% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns * ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * ∼96% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * ∼95% +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * ∼91% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (88 - 118.1, n=21)
85 ns * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 135.3, n=218, last 2 years)
69.4 ns * ∼70% +30%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste de monitor de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de vídeo 4k, Prime95 de alta carga) revelou anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou deteriorações no desempenho.

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * ∼100% -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼42% -46%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * ∼34% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * ∼29% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs * ∼29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * ∼22% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

A lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs PCIe-4 no formato M.2 2280. O SSD PCIe-4 instalado (1 TB) da Samsung oferece taxas de transferência muito boas. As quedas no desempenho devido ao estrangulamento térmico não estavam presentes.

A Lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs.
A Lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.4 pt ∼91%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
78.5 pt ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.8 pt ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.7 pt ∼76%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
72 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
 
62.5 pt ∼63%
DiskSpd
seq read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s ∼98% +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s ∼94% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s ∼90% +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4634, n=50)
3713 MB/s ∼88% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (834 - 5676, n=184, last 2 years)
3097 MB/s ∼74% -13%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s ∼90% +22%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s ∼89% +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼87% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s ∼85% +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 - 4516, n=50)
3557 MB/s ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
  (399 - 7889, n=183, last 2 years)
3288 MB/s ∼69% -7%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s ∼95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s ∼93% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7061, n=50)
6371 MB/s ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1620 - 13195, n=184, last 2 years)
5364 MB/s ∼76% -19%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2226 - 5259, n=50)
4815 MB/s ∼89% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼88% -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10261, n=184, last 2 years)
4026 MB/s ∼74% -19%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.7 - 97.4, n=50)
77.7 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.3 - 97.4, n=184, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s ∼80% -20%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s ∼79% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼77% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s ∼72% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s ∼62% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=183, last 2 years)
203 MB/s ∼61% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 275, n=50)
190.4 MB/s ∼57% -10%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s ∼96%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s ∼66% -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=50)
2486 MB/s ∼58% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (310 - 5829, n=183, last 2 years)
2312 MB/s ∼54% -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s ∼35% -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s ∼75% -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s ∼59% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (288 - 4383, n=183, last 2 years)
2026 MB/s ∼56% -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=50)
1860 MB/s ∼52% -47%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s ∼16% -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points ∼92% +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points ∼84% +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6864 Points ∼75% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=52)
6780 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 10330, n=174, last 2 years)
6237 Points ∼68% -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points ∼66% -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3576 Points ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points ∼96% +20%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points ∼87% +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2562 Points ∼72% -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=52)
2417 Points ∼68% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3629, n=174, last 2 years)
2327 Points ∼65% -19%