Notebookcheck Logo

Revisão da Razer Blade 15 OLED (início de 2022): Um laptop compacto para jogos com um RTX 3070 Ti

Re-polido. A atual encarnação da Lâmina 15 continua a depender das ferragens potentes do Alder Lake e Ampere, mas também oferece uma atualização sedutora: A Razer optou por um visor OLED de alto contraste (QHD) completo com alta taxa de atualização (240 Hz) e excelente cobertura de espaço de cor.

A Razer Blade 15 (início de 2022) tem ambições de ser um laptop tanto para os jogadores quanto para os usuários criativos. O hardware adequado está a bordo: Núcleo i9-12900HcPU, GeForce RTX 3070 TigPU laptop e um visor OLED (QHD) colorido e preciso. Concorrentes compactos similares podem ser encontrados na forma do Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (meados de 22)oAorus 15 XE5oHP Omen 16e oAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Informações sobre o estojo, características, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes já estão à disposição em nossa revisão de seu irmão, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). Este último está equipado com um painel LED (QHD) - a diferença mais relevante em relação ao dispositivo atual.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1035 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, Brilhante: sim, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB livre
Conexões
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235
Bateria
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.01 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g
Preço
3249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.9 %
03/2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
12/2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
08/2022
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Comparação de tamanho

369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 244 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão de memória (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot para um trava de cabo
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão de memória (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Fornecimento de energia, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot para um trava de cabo
Lado esquerdo: Conector de energia, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de áudio combinado
Lado esquerdo: Conector de energia, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), conector de áudio combinado
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1160 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
 
1470 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1692 (1588min - 1709max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1465 - 1762, n=4)
1601 MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1857, n=77, last 2 years)
1513 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=8)
1477 MBit/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=160, last 2 years)
1418 MBit/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Display - O computador móvel Razer traz junto um painel OLED

Pixelraster
Pixel raster

O visor OLED oferece os mesmos dados-chave que o seu irmão-irmão do visor LED: Uma resolução de 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) a uma taxa de atualização de 240 Hz e 15,6 polegadas de diâmetro.

Típico para OLEDs, o painel marca pontos para maravilhosos níveis de preto e tempos de resposta rápidos. Além disso, isto é acompanhado por um brilho máximo relativamente alto. Isto é algo a que sua contraparte LED não consegue segurar uma chama.

Os pontos fracos do painel OLED: Ele tem uma superfície brilhante e cintila a um ajuste de brilho de ≤ 70% a uma freqüência de 500 Hz. A cintilação tecnicamente induzida está ligada à regulação de luminosidade do painel. A este respeito, de seus irmãos painel LED mate e sem cintilação tem seu nariz na frente.

385
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Samsung ATNA562P02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 381 cd/m²
Contraste: 12767:1 (Preto: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-6%
-4%
-20%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
92.8
-5%
95.2
-2%
67.3
-31%
71
-27%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.5
-1%
99.9
1%
96.7
-3%
97.9
-2%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94
83.1
-12%
84.5
-10%
68.2
-27%
73.3
-22%
86.8
-8%
Response Times
-340%
-475%
-365%
-498%
-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
-280%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-620%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-625%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-620%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
-400%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
-330%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
-250%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-370%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
-96%
-169%
-178%
-184%
-106%
Brightness middle
383
497
30%
336
-12%
326
-15%
335
-13%
286
-25%
Brightness
384
481
25%
316
-18%
303
-21%
319
-17%
271
-29%
Brightness Distribution
99
82
-17%
89
-10%
89
-10%
90
-9%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.34
-1033%
0.33
-1000%
0.28
-833%
0.25
-733%
Contrast
12767
2367
-81%
988
-92%
988
-92%
1196
-91%
1144
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
3.53
-87%
3.36
-78%
2.73
-44%
4.38
-132%
2.74
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.76
6.15
-64%
6.67
-77%
9.54
-154%
9.48
-152%
5.21
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.67
3.53
-32%
0.74
72%
1.36
49%
1.33
50%
2.52
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
1.74
-38%
4.7
-273%
5.2
-313%
7
-456%
1.1
13%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.103 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6386 102%
6418 101%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6244 104%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-147% / -112%
-216% / -177%
-188% / -171%
-233% / -193%
-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Mesmo fora da caixa, o display proporciona uma reprodução de cores impressionante: Com um desvio de 1,9, o alvo (DeltaE < 3) é claramente alcançado. A calibração não leva a nenhuma melhoria. A precisão das cores é dada: Os espaços de cor sRGB e DCI-P3 são reproduzidos completa e quase completamente com o espaço de cor AdobeRGB a 94 por cento. O painel de LED do irmão também proporciona resultados igualmente bons.

CalMAN - Verificador de cores
CalMAN - Verificador de cores
CalMAN - Escamas de cinza
CalMAN - Escamas de cinza
CalMAN - Saturação de cores
CalMAN - Saturação de cores
Lâmina vs. AdobeRGB
Lâmina vs. AdobeRGB
Lâmina vs. DCI P3
Lâmina vs. DCI P3
Lâmina vs. sRGB
Lâmina vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

O painel vem com grande estabilidade de ângulo de visão e é legível de todos os ângulos. Entretanto, ao ar livre, isto é difícil devido à superfície brilhante e refletiva da tela.

A Lâmina ao ar livre
A Lâmina ao ar livre
Ângulo de visão
Ângulo de visão

Performance - Blade 15 é baseado em Alder Lake e Ampere

Com o Blade 15 (início de 2022), a Razer tem um laptop em sua linha de produtos projetado para jogos QHD (de alta a máxima configuração), mas também corta uma bela figura em áreas como edição e renderização de vídeo. O modelo revisado aqui pode ser obtido por cerca de US$ 1.967.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Systeminfo

Condições de teste

É possível alternar entre os três modos de desempenho ("Balanceado", "Silencioso" e "Definido pelo usuário") usando a combinação de teclas "Fn" + "P". O perfil "Definido pelo usuário" permite configurações de subpressões para a CPU ("Baixa", "Média", "Alta", "Boost") e GPU ("Baixa", "Média", e "Alta") - via software Razer Synapse pré-instalado. No modo de bateria, somente o perfil "Balanceado" está disponível.

Os benchmarks foram realizados utilizando o modo "User-defined" ativo em configurações máximas (subpresets "Boost" e "High"). Para o teste de bateria, foi utilizado o perfil "Silencioso".

Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse

Processador

ONúcleo i9-12900H(Alder Lake) consiste em seis núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,5 a 5 GHz) e oito núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,8 a 3,8 GHz). No total, existem 20 núcleos lógicos de CPU.

O teste de benchmark Cinebench R15 multi-thread foi processado em 3,6 a 3,8 GHz (P-cores) e 2,8 a 2,9 GHz (E-cores). Fizemos o teste de rosca única em 1,4 a 4,5 GHz (P-cores) e 1,5 a 3,5 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente. No modo de bateria, as velocidades do relógio são mais baixas. O teste de loop CB15 mostra: A carga multi-tarefa só é confrontada com a alta velocidade do relógio turbo por um curto período de tempo. Após 30 a 40 segundos, os valores caem para aproximadamente a velocidade do relógio de base.

Multifios (potência da parede)
Multifios (potência da parede)
Rosca única (potência da parede)
Rosca única (potência da parede)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o ciclo CB15 (Max)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o ciclo CB15 (Max)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do ciclo CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do ciclo CB15 (Equilibrado)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)
Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Silencioso)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
81.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
79.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
78.6 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
74.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
71.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
71.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
55.7 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=239, last 2 years)
19100 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=25)
15301 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points -31%
Single Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=25)
1822 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=237, last 2 years)
1799 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=25)
5761 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=25)
705 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=25)
2482 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=26)
262 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * -40%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=25)
229 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years)
205 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * +17%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)
75363 MIPS +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=25)
61535 MIPS -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)
6062 MIPS +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=25)
5835 MIPS +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)
13326 Points +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=26)
12163 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points -32%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=26)
1797 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years)
1795 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=25)
17.3 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years)
49.1 s * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=25)
42.7 s * +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * +19%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years)
0.4734 sec * +6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=25)
0.4547 sec * +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2543 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
213 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
96.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.7 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
76 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
72 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 60169, n=232, last 2 years)
17811 KRay/s +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=25)
11031 KRay/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 252486, n=232, last 2 years)
89327 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=25)
54480 Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=232, last 2 years)
4191 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=25)
3063 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=232, last 2 years)
107789 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=25)
101523 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=232, last 2 years)
11928 Points +23%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=25)
9091 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 134044, n=232, last 2 years)
45987 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=25)
28345 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points -38%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=232, last 2 years)
104954 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=25)
85224 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=232, last 2 years)
1184 MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=25)
941 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s -13%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 31796, n=232, last 2 years)
9669 KRay/s +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=25)
6131 KRay/s -16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=26)
36777 MPixel/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (11451 - 60161, n=233, last 2 years)
36304 MPixel/s +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s -23%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema funciona de forma suave e confiável e fornece energia suficiente para áreas de aplicação exigentes, como renderização, edição de vídeo e jogos. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão em um nível normal para a memória DDR5-4800 e isto é complementado por bons resultados PC-Mark.

A RAM funciona em modo de canal duplo.
A RAM funciona em modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years)
7573 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years)
10701 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years)
9729 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years)
11407 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2334, n=173, last 2 years)
1870 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points -4%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2204, n=173, last 2 years)
1782 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2514, n=173, last 2 years)
2029 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2327, n=173, last 2 years)
1703 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5789 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
7336 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=25)
59157 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (23850 - 92565, n=232, last 2 years)
58650 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=232, last 2 years)
62444 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=25)
61866 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=232, last 2 years)
60999 MB/s +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=25)
59295 MB/s +2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns *
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (88 - 118.1, n=24)
85.8 ns * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=229, last 2 years)
85.8 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste de monitor de latência padronizado (navegação na Internet, reprodução de vídeo 4k, Prime95 de alta carga) revelou anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Entretanto, futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou deteriorações no desempenho.

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * -46%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

A lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs PCIe-4 no formato M.2 2280. O SSD PCIe-4 instalado (1 TB) da Samsung oferece taxas de transferência muito boas. As quedas no desempenho devido ao estrangulamento térmico não estavam presentes.

A Lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs.
A Lâmina tem espaço para dois SSDs.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
72.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=80)
3777 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=202, last 2 years)
3524 MB/s -1%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s +22%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=202, last 2 years)
3796 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=80)
3589 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=80)
6466 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=202, last 2 years)
6335 MB/s -5%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=80)
4802 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=202, last 2 years)
4758 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=80)
76.9 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=202, last 2 years)
68.3 MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=202, last 2 years)
227 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=80)
188.2 MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=202, last 2 years)
2581 MB/s -38%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=80)
2574 MB/s -38%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=202, last 2 years)
2173 MB/s -38%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s -39%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=80)
1938 MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6864 Points -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=80)
6860 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=190, last 2 years)
6821 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3576 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2562 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=190, last 2 years)
2508 Points -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=80)
2419 Points -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points -30%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3814 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3723 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=80)
3275 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=190, last 2 years)
3097 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2953 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2916 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -12%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5592.23 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5171.96 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=190, last 2 years)
4916 MB/s +6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=80)
4902 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4623.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3388 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4240 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3881.37 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=190, last 2 years)
3632 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3551.32 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=80)
3328 MB/s -6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3311.86 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2667.04 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
106.98 MB/s +77%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
73.81 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=80)
72.5 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=190, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
66.29 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.3 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
52.1 MB/s -14%
4K Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
289.15 MB/s +57%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
247.26 MB/s +34%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=190, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
205 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
189.98 MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=80)
186.1 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
183.9 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2909.44 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2539.3 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2335.71 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2171 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=190, last 2 years)
1943 MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=80)
1856 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1380.56 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3193.44 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3144.88 MB/s +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=80)
2756 MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2579.14 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=190, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2376.83 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2324 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.083 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.07 ms * +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.056 ms * +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.02 - 0.379, n=188, last 2 years)
0.05335 ms * +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.052 ms * +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.045 ms * +46%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=79)
0.03744 ms * +55%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * +72%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * -164%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=190, last 2 years)
0.04879 ms * -122%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=80)
0.03428 ms * -56%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.02 ms * +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.016 ms * +27%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7)
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø7001 (6418.71-7045.97)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6496 (1637.54-6888.72)
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6887 (6595.77-6910.33)

Placa gráfica

OGeForce RTX 3070 TigPU laptop (VRAM: 8192 MB GDDR6) fornece resultados 3D-Mark no nível médio da GPU determinado até agora e o TGP máximo relativamente baixo de 110 watts é perceptível. A saída direta da imagem através da GPU GeForce leva a um aumento insignificante na performance gráfica. A comutação entre o modo Optimus e dGPU é feita diretamente na BIOS ou através do software Razer Synapse. Otimus avançado não é suportado.

Fire Strike (potência da parede, Max)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, Max)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, dGPU, Max)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, dGPU, Max)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, Equilibrada)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, Equilibrada)
Fire Strike (modo de bateria, balanceado)
Fire Strike (modo de bateria, balanceado)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, Silencioso)
Fire Strike (potência da parede, Silencioso)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
96.2 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
93.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
92.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
90.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
89.3 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
88 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
84 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
82.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
37438 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37151 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36023 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
35719 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34141 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
32236 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32235 Points -11%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
153993 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
153719 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
145558 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144658 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
141689 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137434 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=150, last 2 years)
135325 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
28601 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28374 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
27309 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27183 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25891 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24766 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
24618 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
11071 Points +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10623 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
10357 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10157 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9980 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
9421 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9048 Points -11%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
48871 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
30645 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59982 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23793 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
10342 pontos
Ajuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
28 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
26 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
26 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22 - 30, n=15)
25.3 Seconds * +3%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
24 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=173, last 2 years)
23.3 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
45 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
45 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
44 Seconds * +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 46, n=16)
41.4 Seconds * +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
40 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=178, last 2 years)
39.7 Seconds * +12%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
559 Seconds * -49%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
404 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
378 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
376 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (285 - 459, n=16)
376 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
329 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)
318 Seconds * +15%
GPUScore: Sacred Path
2560x1440 Official VRS
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)
134.8 (63.1min, 116.3P1 - 196.8max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)
17.9 (14.8min, 14.9P1 - 27.9max) fps -87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)
134.8 (63.1min, 116.3P1 - 196.8max) fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12. dGPU)
132.1 (111.8min, 113.5P1 - 195.7max) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.89 - 305, n=204, last 2 years)
132.8 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (17.9 - 134.8, n=4)
104.9 fps -22%
2560x1440 Official
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)
130.6 (107.4min, 111.4P1 - 183.5max) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12, dGPU)
122.4 (103.4min, 104.7P1 - 186.3max) fps -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)
129.4 (23min, 110P1 - 180.4max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)
17 (14.2min, 14.3P1 - 25.6max) fps -87%
Average of class Gaming
  (2.34 - 291, n=259, last 2 years)
128.2 fps -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (1.0.0 Vulkan 1.3)
115.7 (58.1min, 92.3P1 - 149.7max) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (17 - 130.6, n=6)
107.2 fps -17%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
128448 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
123594 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (100630 - 150471, n=38)
121784 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=240, last 2 years)
121339 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
116873 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
110844 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
109157 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
108536 Points -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
107175 Points -8%
Vulkan Score
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
86126 Points +363%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
64974 Points +249%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
61835 Points +232%
Average of class Gaming
  (1806 - 160279, n=237, last 2 years)
40362 Points +117%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1806 - 92020, n=38)
30935 Points +66%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
19240 Points +3%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
18687 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
18599 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
8280 Points -55%
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
96149 Points +403%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19109 - 96149, n=2)
57629 Points +202%
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=43, last 2 years)
46212 Points +142%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
19109 Points
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)
116331 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
104147 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (103225 - 104147, n=2)
103686 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
103225 Points -1%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=129, last 2 years)
2029 mpaths +37%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
1834 mpaths +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1334 - 1847, n=15)
1570 mpaths +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
1480 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
1471 mpaths -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1455 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=132, last 2 years)
1466 mpaths +21%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
1378 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1062 - 1391, n=14)
1261 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
1214 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
1210 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1194 mpaths -2%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1690 - 26944, n=146, last 2 years)
13124 mpaths +27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
10826 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
10360 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H (5.0.1)
10193 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (2880 - 11931, n=20)
9832 mpaths -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
9590 mpaths -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
7572 mpaths -27%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (55 - 1334, n=193, last 2 years)
595 mpaths +34%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
558 mpaths +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (277 - 559, n=33)
465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
456 mpaths +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
445 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)
435 mpaths -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
399 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
398 mpaths -11%
CPU
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
18763 ksamples +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2741 - 37629, n=193, last 2 years)
18707 ksamples +20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)
16498 ksamples +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
16474 ksamples +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
15575 ksamples
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4722 - 19786, n=33)
15523 ksamples 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
14684 ksamples -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
11804 ksamples -24%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (2.93 - 231, n=35, last 2 years)
33 fps +62%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
20.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19.9 - 20.4, n=2)
20.2 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
18.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (23.5 - 59.9, n=35, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
33.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.1 - 33.1, n=2)
32.6 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32 fps -3%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=33, last 2 years)
397 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
334 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
334 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
285.6 fps -14%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=35, last 2 years)
42.3 fps +79%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.6 - 23.8, n=2)
23.7 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
23.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
23.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=34, last 2 years)
103 fps +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
95 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
85.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=35, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
65.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (63.6 - 65.5, n=2)
64.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.6 fps -9%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=35, last 2 years)
123.2 fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
104.8 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
98.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (95.6 - 98.5, n=2)
97 fps -2%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho nos jogos

O laptop é projetado para jogos de QHD em configurações altas a máximas. Resoluções mais altas seriam possíveis através da conexão a um monitor adequado - embora às vezes em configurações reduzidas. A taxa de quadros dos títulos testados está em um nível típico para a média RTX 3070 Ti determinada. A saída direta de imagem via GeForce GPU pode levar - dependendo do jogo - a um aumento mínimo na taxa de quadros.

Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
94.3 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
92.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
87.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=238, last 2 years)
115.1 fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107.2 (99min) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)
102.4 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.1 (21.9min, 25.6P0.1, 52.5P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.7 (83min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
97.7 (84min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 (82min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.8 (38.7min, 41.3P0.1, 60.8P1) fps -5%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (4.44min, 76.9P1) fps +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115.6 (3.67min, 83.3P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
113.7 (33.2min, 76.9P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (16.1min, 76.9P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.2 (10.6min, 76.9P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.1 (4.18min, 76.9P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 123.9, n=36)
106.7 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=227, last 2 years)
106.3 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 (16.4min, 66.7P1) fps -12%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=237, last 2 years)
109.6 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
106 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
104.6 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)
103.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
100.3 fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.6 (59min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)
98.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
94.8 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
93.8 fps -6%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=235, last 2 years)
203 fps +17%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
188.5 (48.7min, 134P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
184 (33.3min, 131P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (109 - 221, n=37)
179.9 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)
175.9 (41.6min, 131.7P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
173.4 (30.1min, 131.1P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
165.6 (39.1min, 131.2P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
163.8 (35.9min, 125.2P1) fps -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
146.6 (72.6min, 102.4P1) fps -15%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
160.5 (140.4min) fps +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (135.1min) fps +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
145.2 (127.1min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=248, last 2 years)
141.2 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.8 (121.1min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)
135.6 fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
134.9 (115.1min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133 (114.4min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
125.3 (106.2min) fps -6%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115 fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.5 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.3 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
100.8 fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=253, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)
95.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.8 fps -9%

A fim de verificar se as taxas de quadros continuam estáveis por períodos de tempo mais longos, executamos o jogo "The Witcher 3" por cerca de 60 minutos em resolução Full HD e ajustes de qualidade máxima. O personagem do jogo não foi movido e não houve queda perceptível nas taxas de quadros.

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97)
Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.3 (92-105)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø96.2 (88-100)
Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102.3 (87-111)
Análise da GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Max)
Análise da GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Max)
Análise GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Max, dGPU)
Análise GPU durante o teste Witcher 3 (Max, dGPU)
baixo média alto ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 182.7 177.2 172.8 113 94.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 365.8 288.5 176.6 96.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 162 148.2 143.4 133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 174.2 133.3 100.3 75.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 133.3 121.6 95
Far Cry 5 (2018) 170 141 135 126 100
Strange Brigade (2018) 351 240 197.2 173.4 130.9
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 124.8 97.8 70.2 52.2 41.3
F1 22 (2022) 203 202 173.1 65.2 42.3
FIFA 23 (2022) 104.3
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 101.6 84 73.3 62.9 50.5
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 78 75.2 71.8 69.3 56.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 126 112 89 85 63
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 107 102.6 94.9 93.2 69.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 117 99.3 71 70.7 52.8
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 112.8 106.9 93 84.6 66.7
High On Life (2023) 175.7 139.4 117.5 97.1 60.8
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 174.4 149.6 81.3 71.4 47.4
Dead Space Remake (2023) 82.1 74.6 68.1 66.8 47.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 88.5 79 69.7 59.3 42.6

Emissões - O laptop Razer não aquece excessivamente

Emissões sonoras

No total, para um laptop para jogos, os níveis de ruído são moderados. No uso ocioso e cotidiano (escritório e internet), os ventiladores funcionam em baixa velocidade e são praticamente inaudíveis. Sob carga total (teste de estresse, Witcher 3 teste) os níveis de pressão sonora podem subir até 43,9 dB (A). O perfil de desempenho "Silencioso" não faz o que o nome sugere, mas consegue diminuir o ruído de fundo - em detrimento da potência computacional.

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 28 / 28 dB
Carga
38.5 / 43.9 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.233.328.129.529.22534.237.53336.334.23137.139.734.136.737.14034.634.540.530.634.65033.432.329.630.233.46325.3272426.325.38020.3202119.220.310022.122.722.22022.112521.72322.121.521.716018.221.6241918.220016.8222418.716.825016.121.524.517.816.131515.823.927.218.415.840015.323.52816.815.350014.823.827.316.414.863013.321.426.514.413.380013.126.331.116.713.1100013.52731.717.313.5125013.427.432.117.913.4160013.730.535.217.313.7200013.730.335.516.813.7250013.52934.415.313.5315013.627.534.51413.6400013.921.530.713.813.9500013.819.62714.113.8630013.917.92314.113.980001415.819.814.2141000013.914.516.114.113.91250013.714.2151413.716000131514.11413SPL2638.543.927.926N0.82.64.110.8median 13.9median 22.7median 27median 16.7median 13.9Delta1.44.35.11.91.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Noise
-10%
-6%
-5%
-16%
-4%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
24
8%
26
-0%
26
-0%
25.4
2%
Idle Minimum *
28
23
18%
26
7%
26
7%
30
-7%
26.2
6%
Idle Average *
28
24
14%
28
-0%
28
-0%
31
-11%
26.2
6%
Idle Maximum *
28
47
-68%
30
-7%
31
-11%
33
-18%
28.4
-1%
Load Average *
38.5
47.91
-24%
48
-25%
45
-17%
49
-27%
44.7
-16%
Load Maximum *
43.9
50.25
-14%
52
-18%
48
-9%
57
-30%
51.9
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.91
52
46
53
44.7

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

No uso diário (escritório, internet), as temperaturas do estojo permanecem muito na zona verde. Sob carga (teste de estresse, Witcher 3 teste) o laptop aquece visivelmente, mas não excessivamente.

 42.9 °C49.5 °C40.9 °C 
 32.2 °C45.5 °C30.9 °C 
 36.5 °C34.4 °C32.9 °C 
Máximo: 49.5 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
44.3 °C47.5 °C41 °C
34.7 °C45.7 °C38.1 °C
37.4 °C41.2 °C36.1 °C
Máximo: 47.5 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  55.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Topo de distribuição de calor (carga)
Topo de distribuição de calor (carga)
Topo de distribuição de calor (ocioso)
Topo de distribuição de calor (ocioso)
Topo de distribuição de calor (Witcher 3)
Topo de distribuição de calor (Witcher 3)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (carga)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (carga)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (ocioso)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (ocioso)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (Witcher 3)
Fundo de distribuição de calor (Witcher 3)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
-12%
-15%
9%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.5
52
-5%
46
7%
52
-5%
41
17%
50
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
47.5
51
-7%
57
-20%
63
-33%
62
-31%
47
1%
Idle Upper Side *
33.4
29
13%
38
-14%
37
-11%
25
25%
37.4
-12%
Idle Bottom *
35
33
6%
42
-20%
38
-9%
26
26%
38.4
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

A Lâmina durante o teste de estresse.
A Lâmina durante o teste de estresse.

O teste de esforço (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) apresenta o cenário extremo de análise da estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. No decorrer do teste, a velocidade da CPU caiu de um ponto inicial de 2,5 GHz (P-cores) e 2,1 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente, para cerca de 1,7 GHz (P-cores) e 1,5 GHz (E-cores), respectivamente. A velocidade do relógio da GPU flutua entre 700 e 1.300 MHz.

Oradores

Os alto-falantes estéreo produzem um som decente, mas que carece de graves.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202929.229253234.2323132.837.132.84033.934.633.9503333.4336325.325.325.38023.520.323.510034.122.134.112544.521.744.51605318.25320050.716.850.725055.416.155.431565.515.865.540074.515.374.550077.214.877.26307713.37780080.413.180.4100080.513.580.5125077.113.477.1160078.513.778.5200079.313.779.3250075.313.575.3315073.213.673.2400070.813.970.8500074.113.874.1630076.413.976.4800076.71476.71000080.113.980.11250074.913.774.91600069.31369.3SPL89.22689.2N83.80.883.8median 75.3median 13.9median 75.3Delta6.21.46.231.333.531.338.832.738.84537.7453123.63126.824.426.830.618.130.635.416.135.437.319.337.348.716.148.759.715.659.764.518.764.565.820.665.864.813.764.862.88.662.866.78.466.775.47.975.474.88.174.870.8870.869.18.569.1749.37473.79.773.769.710.869.765.610.965.665.311.365.368.411.668.470.611.770.670.111.970.168.51268.569.512.169.565.41165.48323.18358.70.558.7median 68.4median 11.3median 68.43.13.43.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - A Lâmina está muito faminta no uso ocioso

Consumo de energia

No uso ocioso, os requisitos de energia (até 39 watts) são comparativamente altos. Este parece ser um problema geral encontrado nos modelos de lâminas de 2022 que que encontramos em muitas ocasiões. Sob carga, o consumo é normal para este tipo de hardware. Enquanto o teste Witcher 3 funcionava com consumo de energia constante, as exigências caíram abruptamente durante o teste de estresse - a CPU foi asfixiada. A unidade de fornecimento de energia (230 watts) tem o tamanho adequado.

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.65 / 5.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31.6 / 33.3 / 38.6 Watt
Carga midlight 149 / 160 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
26%
-18%
24%
29%
-8%
18%
20%
Idle Minimum *
31.6
10.8
66%
31
2%
12
62%
4
87%
33.2
-5%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
55%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=185, last 2 years)
56%
Idle Average *
33.3
17
49%
35
-5%
17
49%
10
70%
36.4
-9%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
40%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=185, last 2 years)
43%
Idle Maximum *
38.6
17.8
54%
46
-19%
24
38%
19
51%
37.6
3%
26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27)
32%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=185, last 2 years)
31%
Load Average *
149
116
22%
120
19%
106
29%
114
23%
116.7
22%
125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27)
16%
111.2 ?(32.1 - 202, n=185, last 2 years)
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149.6
144
4%
202
-35%
159.9
-7%
183.2
-22%
172
-15%
Load Maximum *
160
220
-38%
268
-68%
208
-30%
221
-38%
228.6
-43%
248 ?(160 - 319, n=27)
-55%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=184, last 2 years)
-56%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (124.3-155)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø149.2 (145.9-160.7)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø34.3 (32.4-37.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø65.5 (61.8-78.2)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (43-78.2)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132.4-160.1)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø143.3 (134.9-149.9)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.4 (23.4-28.2)

Duração da bateria

No teste WiFi (abertura de websites usando um roteiro) e no teste de vídeo (curta-metragem Big Buck Bunny (codificação H.264, FHD) em loop), o dispositivo de 15 polegadas atingiu tempos de funcionamento da bateria de 4,34 horas e 5,52 horas, respectivamente. As funções de economia de energia do laptop foram desativadas durante ambos os testes e o brilho do visor foi ajustado para 150 cd/m². O teste de vídeo também foi realizado com o módulo de rádio desligado.

Em suma, a Lâmina não foi capaz de proporcionar uma impressionante vida útil da bateria - mesmo para um poderoso portátil QHD. Em todo o quadro, a concorrência oferece melhor resistência - tanto em termos absolutos como também em termos de watt-hora calculada.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 44min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)
4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 05min
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
18%
24%
52%
21%
7%
12%
Reader / Idle
404
601
49%
931
130%
603
49%
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
34%
H.264
352
436
24%
371
5%
448
27%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years)
11%
WiFi v1.3
274
445
62%
410
50%
446
63%
336
23%
292
7%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
33%
Load
125
86
-31%
112
-10%
109
-13%
114
-9%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
-32%

Pro

+ Visor OLED brilhante, de alto contraste (QHD)
+ Boa reprodução de cores e cobertura do espaço de cores
+ Moldura de tela fina
+ Caixa metálica robusta
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Produção de calor comparativamente moderada
+ SSD PCIe-4
+ Espaço para um segundo SSD PCIe-4
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Fornecimento de energia

Contra

- Visor reflexivo
- Má vida útil da bateria
- Altos requisitos de energia no uso ocioso
- Sem Optimus Avançado

Verdict- Uma casa de força compacta

A Razer Blade 15 (início de 22), fornecida pela Razer.
A Razer Blade 15 (início de 22), fornecida pela Razer.

As principais áreas de aplicação da Lâmina 15 devem ser encontradas na edição de vídeo, renderização e jogos. OCore-i9 12900HcPU e GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptopa GPU (TGP: 110 watts) fornece a potência necessária. Um rápido PCIe-4 SSD (1 TB) garante curtos tempos de carregamento.

A lâmina 15 OLED (Início de 2022) é uma ferramenta poderosa tanto para os jogadores quanto para os tipos criativos.

O foco não está somente no alto desempenho: Os resultados máximos dos núcleos computacionais são médios quando comparados com os laptops previamente revisados com a 12900H ou 3070 Ti. Embora a produção de calor seja típica para um laptop com esta potência, as emissões de ruído são relativamente moderadas. Este último não pode ser dito sobre o consumo de energia em uso ocioso: O Blade 15 ajuda-se a um gole muito grande da garrafa.

A vida real da bateria de 4 a 6 horas não impressiona. A este respeito, a concorrência tem muito mais a oferecer. Entretanto, a bateria pode ser carregada através de uma fonte de alimentação universal USB-C (mín. 65 watts, 20 V) e ambas as portas USB-C (2x Thunderbolt) suportam o fornecimento de energia (e Displayport).

Em geral, o painel OLED refletivo (QHD) tem pontuação um pouco melhor do que o painel de LED convencional (QHD) encontrado no modelo Blade 2022 previamente revisado. Ambos os displays oferecem boa cobertura de espaço de cor (sRGB: 100%) e boa reprodução de cor. O modelo OLED tem seu nariz na frente quando se trata de níveis de preto, brilho e tempos de resposta, onde o modelo LED pontua graças a sua superfície fosca.

Uma possível alternativa a este dispositivo poderia vir na forma doAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z. Em termos de desempenho, o processador está no mesmo nível, mas marca pontos extras devido a uma exibição mais brilhante, no formato 16:10, bem como uma duração de bateria consideravelmente maior. Uma alternativa orçamentária poderia ser oAorus 15 XE5. Apesar desta máquina ser algumas centenas de dólares mais barata em preço, ela fornece um pouco mais de energia e melhor duração da bateria do que a Lâmina.

Preço e disponibilidade

A especificação de revisão Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22) pode ser obtida em Amazon por US$1.967.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) - 03/04/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
73 / 80 → 91%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
63 / 95 → 66%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
85 / 90 → 95%
Audio
82%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Médio
80%
90%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Revisão da Razer Blade 15 OLED (início de 2022): Um laptop compacto para jogos com um RTX 3070 Ti
Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-10 (Update: 2023-03-10)