Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5280 (7200U, HD)

Pequeno e potente. A Dell criou um chassi significantemente mais leve agora, e a porta E-Port esta se tornando uma coisa do passado. No entanto, a falta do Thunderbolt 3, limita muito as capacidades deste amis recente design Latitude.
Dell Latitude 5280 (Latitude Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, 21.20.16.4627
Memória
4 GB 
, DDR4-2400, PC4-19200, 17-17-17-39
Pantalha
12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 125 PPI, TN LED, ID: AUO106C, Nome: AU Optronics B125XW01 V0 (B125XTN), Dell P/N: 9X5G1, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba MQ01ACF050, 500 GB 
, 7200 rpm
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor MicroSD, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21.4 x 305.2 x 211.3
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.36 kg, Suprimento de energia: 290 g
Preço
950 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

310.5 mm 214.5 mm 22.65 mm 1.7 kg310 mm 218.9 mm 18.9 mm 1.3 kg305.2 mm 211.3 mm 21.4 mm 1.4 kg305.5 mm 208.5 mm 20.3 mm 1.4 kg304.8 mm 210 mm 18.45 mm 1.3 kg299 mm 219 mm 15.4 mm 1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, USB 3.0, VGA-out, Gigabit RJ-45, Noble Lock
Right: 3.5 mm headphones, USB 3.0, VGA-out, Gigabit RJ-45, Noble Lock
Rear: SIM slot, MicroSD reader
Rear: SIM slot, MicroSD reader
Left: AC adapter, USB Type-C (+ DisplayPort support), HDMI, USB 3.0
Left: AC adapter, USB Type-C (+ DisplayPort support), HDMI, USB 3.0
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
 
62.2 MB/s +37%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
 
60.5 MB/s +33%
Dell Latitude 5280
 
45.51 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5280
 
92 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
 
88 MB/s -4%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
 
81.6 MB/s -11%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s +3%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s +1%
Dell Latitude 5280
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
497 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
671 MBit/s +3%
Dell Latitude 5280
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
650 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
579 MBit/s -11%
239.4
cd/m²
230.9
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
245.7
cd/m²
251.8
cd/m²
251.3
cd/m²
248.9
cd/m²
256.6
cd/m²
242.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 256.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 246.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.29 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 251.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 336:1 (Preto: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
Dell Latitude 5280
TN LED, 12.50, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 5289
BOE NV12N51, IPS LED, 12.50, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Innolux N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 12.50, 1920x1080
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AU Optronics, IPS, 12.50, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
BOE05F4, TN, 12.50, 1366x768
Display
9%
12%
24%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
39.34
42.79
9%
44.6
13%

44.6
13%

49.16
25%
39.06
-1%
sRGB Coverage
59.2
64.3
9%
65.9
11%

65.9
11%

72.3
22%
58.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.67
44.21
9%
46.11
13%

46.11
13%

50.8
25%
40.36
-1%
Response Times
-17%
-14%
-8%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(21.2, 20.8)
42 ?(22, 20)
-0%
40.8 ?(21.2, 19.6)
3%
47 ?(27, 20)
-12%
45.2 ?(22.4, 22.8)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 ?(17.2, 6)
31 ?(18, 13)
-34%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-31%
24 ?(14, 10)
-3%
24 ?(6.8, 17.2)
-3%
PWM Frequency
531 ?(90)
26040 ?(50)
1000 ?(90)
Screen
55%
49%
81%
9%
Brightness middle
251.8
336
33%
283
12%
329
31%
161
-36%
Brightness
246
320
30%
281
14%
310
26%
152
-38%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
94
4%
88
-2%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.75
0.34
55%
0.25
67%
0.19
75%
0.29
61%
Contrast
336
988
194%
1132
237%
1732
415%
555
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11.3
3.45
69%
6.1
46%
2.69
76%
10.31
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
23.1
7.95
66%
15.4
33%
4.47
81%
18.58
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.2
1.68
87%
6
55%
4.23
68%
11.3
14%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.49 88%
2.05 107%
2.21 100%
2.57 86%
CCT
14912 44%
6782 96%
6832 95%
6011 108%
13574 48%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.6
41
9%
42.26
12%
46
22%
37.32
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.2
64
8%
65.43
11%
72
22%
58.82
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 36%
16% / 30%
32% / 58%
1% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
164 Points +27%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
Intel Core i7-7500U
147 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
143 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points +9%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points -2%
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA
Intel Core i5-6300U
110 Points -15%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points -33%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
77 Points -40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
369 Points +13%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
351 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
Intel Core i7-7500U
331 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
327 Points 0%
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA
Intel Core i5-6300U
308 Points -6%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points -22%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
229 Points -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.87 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.59 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.57 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.46 Points -1%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points -30%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
0.86 Points -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
4.13 Points +13%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.89 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.83 Points +4%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.65 Points -1%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points -22%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2.47 Points -33%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
11798 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
Intel Core i7-7500U
11455 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
11214 Points -1%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
6854 Points -39%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
Intel Core i7-7500U
5706 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
5264 Points +5%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2621 Points -48%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
645 s * -38%
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA
Intel Core i5-6300U
523 s * -12%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
482 s * -3%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
475.7 s * -2%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
469 s * -0%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.3 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
446.9 s * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7829
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11292
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4999
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.68 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.12 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3575 Points +5%
Dell Latitude 5289
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
3554 Points +4%
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3409 Points
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
3291 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2665 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5289
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
4681 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4660 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
4365 Points
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
4273 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3885 Points -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3928 Points
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
3588 Points -9%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3313 Points -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3409 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3928 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4365 pontos
Ajuda
Dell Latitude 5280
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Dell Latitude 5289
SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
HP EliteBook 725 G4
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
9086%
18752%
6641%
-1%
Read Seq
107.5
423.7
294%
1190
1007%
1963
1726%
113.8
6%
Write Seq
95.3
406.4
326%
985
934%
1409
1378%
108.5
14%
Read 512
31.13
260.8
738%
858
2656%
949
2949%
24.9
-20%
Write 512
45.49
255.6
462%
528
1061%
890
1856%
51.9
14%
Read 4k
0.357
22.73
6267%
35.27
9780%
29.75
8233%
0.398
11%
Write 4k
0.827
27.92
3276%
124.5
14954%
47.35
5626%
0.654
-21%
Read 4k QD32
0.737
306.2
41447%
495.3
67105%
139.7
18855%
0.798
8%
Write 4k QD32
0.795
158.8
19875%
418.3
52516%
100.2
12504%
0.636
-20%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 53.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 125 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 104.5 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 16 ms
Índice de Explosão: 237.9 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 1.7 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
3220 Points +146%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1648 Points +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1475 Points +13%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1309 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1281 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54
1175 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
803 Points -39%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
2784 Points +212%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1530 Points +72%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1519 Points +70%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54
1024 Points +15%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
892 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
891 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
778 Points -13%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
14594 Points +136%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
8555 Points +38%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
7361 Points +19%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
6189 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
6152 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
4309 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
1903 Points +183%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
1008 Points +50%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
672 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
663 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
504 Points -25%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
98218 Points +188%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U
48374 Points +42%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
34077 Points
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
33478 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
22497 Points -34%
3DMark 11 Performance
1378 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
49846 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5281 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
633 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 29.9 20.9 18
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 14

Barulho

Ocioso
32.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
33.4 / 37 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 27.6 dB(A)
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Dell Latitude 5289
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
HP EliteBook 725 G4
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
Noise
1%
3%
4%
-1%
off / environment *
27.6
30.5
-11%
29
-5%
30.4
-10%
29.2
-6%
Idle Minimum *
32.6
30.5
6%
29
11%
30.4
7%
32.9
-1%
Idle Average *
32.7
30.5
7%
29
11%
30.4
7%
32.9
-1%
Idle Maximum *
32.7
30.5
7%
30.4
7%
30.4
7%
32.9
-1%
Load Average *
33.4
36
-8%
34.1
-2%
31.7
5%
33.7
-1%
Load Maximum *
37
34.6
6%
37.6
-2%
34.4
7%
34.9
6%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 40 °C42.4 °C48.4 °C 
 36.2 °C38.2 °C30.8 °C 
 26.8 °C27.4 °C28.4 °C 
Máximo: 48.4 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
36.8 °C49.2 °C41.4 °C
29.8 °C43.4 °C42 °C
30.2 °C28.2 °C29.4 °C
Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.240.42536.333.33134.536.14034.233.9503233.26332.532.58031.73210030.430.812530.331.516028.544.520027.953.225027.253.931526.649.340026.152.150026.155.263025.362.580026.868100026.364.1125025.361.7160024.765.320002466.1250023.867.9315023.768.8400023.572.5500023.370.2630023.264800023.269.91000023.175.61250023.176.11600023.471.8SPL36.781.1N2.847.4median 25.3median 64.1Delta1.78.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 5280Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Dell Latitude 5280 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.31 / 0.47 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.7 / 6.9 / 7.1 Watt
Carga midlight 28.3 / 30.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Dell Latitude 5280
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 12.50
Dell Latitude 5289
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.50
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.50
HP EliteBook 725 G4
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN, 1366x768, 12.50
Power Consumption
12%
-1%
0%
2%
Idle Minimum *
5.7
2.7
53%
3.5
39%
4.5
21%
3.9
32%
Idle Average *
6.9
5.1
26%
5.8
16%
6.3
9%
6
13%
Idle Maximum *
7.1
7.6
-7%
7.6
-7%
8.3
-17%
6.6
7%
Load Average *
28.3
33
-17%
33.2
-17%
27.6
2%
28.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
30.2
29
4%
40.4
-34%
34.5
-14%
41.7
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 18min
Dell Latitude 5280
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Dell Latitude 5289
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh
HP EliteBook 725 G4
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 49 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 E5270
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 47 Wh
Battery Runtime
35%
-21%
-22%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1112
1728
55%
1023
-8%
700
-37%
772
-31%
WiFi v1.3
470
708
51%
324
-31%
380
-19%
398
-15%
Load
138
136
-1%
104
-25%
123
-11%
128
-7%

Pro

+ Opções de capacidade de baterias múltiplas; longa duração da bateria
+ VGA, slot SIM, USB Type-C, Smart Card (opcional)
+ Sem afogamentos; ótimo desempenho Turbo Boost
+ Desempenho do sistema com a bateria
+ Chassi rígido; MIL STD 810G
+ Mais leve e menor que o E5270
+ Ruído constante da ventoinha; sem pulsos
+ Teclado relativamente silencioso
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ WiGig opcional

Contra

- Tela TN 768p decepcionante; contraste pobre; gama estreita
- Menos recursos de segurança que os da série 5480/5580
- Teclado apertado; resposta esponjosa das teclas
- Apenas uma baia de armazenamento por vez
- Sem Thunderbolt 3, sem E-Port, sem NFC
- Sem opções de CPU de classe HQ
- Ventoinha do sistema sempre ativa
- Botões do mouse esponjosos
- Sem TrackPoint
In review: Dell Latitude 5280
In review: Dell Latitude 5280

Um ponto de venda importante da maioria dos portáteis de negócios é a capacidade de conectar facilmente estações docking ou baterias externas. Agora que a série Latitude 5280/5480/5580 deixou de lado o E-Port, o Thunderbolt 3 está se tornando ainda mais crucial para suportar recursos adicionais. Infelizmente o Latitude 5280 carece de ambos e, consequentemente, é menos versátil do que o 5480 e o 5580, embora seja menor e mais portátil. Além disso, a ventoinha do sistema está sempre ativa, o qual achamos desnecessário para um portátil que ostenta apenas processadores classe U. 

Se as desvantagens acima não forem um obstáculo, no entanto, então o 5280 se destaca na maioria das outras categorias. Sua porta USB Type-C ainda será uma saída para DisplayPort de monitores externos e o novo chassi é muito mais leve que o E5270 sem ser notavelmente mais frágil. As durações da bateria já são excelentes na opção de bateria de gama média e preservar as saídas VGA e HDMI deve ser útil em lugares como universidades e da salas de conferência. O desempenho da CPU em particular é impressionante, pois o processador é capaz de manter velocidades máximas do Turbo Boost, mesmo durante cargas de trabalho muito altas.

Recomendamos que evite a muito pobre tela 768p e opte pela opção 1080p mais brilhante, com SSD primários mais rápidos. A melhoria na resolução e no brilho tornará o portátil mais confortável de usar e o investimento vale totalmente se o sistema for usado com frequência sem monitores externos. 

Pode levar algum tempo se acostumar ao teclado um pouco esponjoso, e os usuários com mãos maiores podem querer evitar essa categoria de tamanho especial para digitação pesada. O 5280 é mais para usuários em constante movimento do que algo para estar em um lugar fixo em casa ou no escritório.

Dell Latitude 5280 - 05/27/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
88 /  98 → 90%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
54 / 80 → 67%
Peso
71 / 35-78 → 83%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
75%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 79%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 87 → 89%
Temperatura
89 / 91 → 98%
Ruído
88%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Médio
73%
83%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5280 (7200U, HD)
Allen Ngo, 2017-06- 9 (Update: 2017-06-14)