C 2018
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy x360 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U, Radeon Vega 8)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/09/2017

Uma joia muito áspera. O desempenho por dólar é facilmente o destaque do primeiro portátil da HP centrado em torno da plataforma Raven Ridge da AMD. É uma pena que o software ainda seja uma bagunça de bugs.

HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx (Envy x360 15 Serie)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 - 256 MB, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 400 MHz, DDR4, 22.19.655.0
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 17-17-17-39, 1167 MHz, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10-Punkt kapazitiv, ID: BOE06F9, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB 
, 7200 rpm
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Klinkenstecker, Card Reader: SD-Leser, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Beschleunigungssensor
Funcionamento em rede
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: B822 (b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 360 x 249
Bateria
55.8 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 Zellen
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, HP CoolSense, McAfee, HP 3D DriveGuard, , 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.18 kg, Suprimento de energia: 341 g
Preço
630 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, Volume rocker, USB 3.1, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, Volume rocker, USB 3.1, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: HDMI 2.0b, USB 3.1, Power button, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: HDMI 2.0b, USB 3.1, Power button, 3.5 mm combo audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
 
126.3 MB/s ∼100% +86%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
120.5 MB/s ∼95% +78%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
 
67.8 MB/s ∼54%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
 
23.59 MB/s ∼19% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +219%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
 
250.6 MB/s ∼99% +217%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
 
79.17 MB/s ∼31%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
 
20.96 MB/s ∼8% -74%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼98% +37%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
625 MBit/s ∼94% +32%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: B822
473 MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼89% +21%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
503 MBit/s ∼85% +15%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: B822
438 MBit/s ∼74%
225.5
cd/m²
215.5
cd/m²
233.3
cd/m²
213.7
cd/m²
230.2
cd/m²
226.7
cd/m²
204.8
cd/m²
229.1
cd/m²
218.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 233.3 cd/m² Médio: 221.9 cd/m² Minimum: 11.96 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 230.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1151:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
ID: BOE06F9, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
BOE0679 , IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
IGZO IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
113%
-23%
91%
4193%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.8 (14, 16.8)
44 (20.4, 23.6)
-43%
56 (22.8, 33.2)
-82%
57.2 (27.2, 30)
-86%
29.6 (15.6, 14)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (18, 15.6)
38.8 (6.4, 32.4)
-15%
28.8 (6, 22.8)
14%
39.2 (23.6, 15.6)
-17%
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
21%
PWM Frequency
201.6 (99)
1000 (99)
396%
201.6
0%
961.5
377%
25510 (69)
12554%
Screen
36%
0%
21%
6%
Brightness middle
230.2
351.5
53%
204.9
-11%
370.1
61%
300.9
31%
Brightness
222
336
51%
190
-14%
356
60%
285
28%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
82
-7%
87
-1%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.24
-20%
0.203
-2%
0.37
-85%
0.24
-20%
Contrast
1151
1465
27%
1009
-12%
1000
-13%
1254
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
3.3
42%
4.7
18%
5.3
7%
5
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.8
7.3
65%
9.03
57%
9.9
52%
10.2
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.9
27%
3.86
-48%
4.6
-77%
7
-169%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.09 105%
2.36 93%
2.31 95%
2.34 94%
CCT
6109 106%
6784 96%
6834 95%
6284 103%
6578 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.5
64.4
72%
41
9%
88.3
135%
59
57%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.9
88.2
52%
64
11%
100
73%
90
55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
75% / 54%
-12% / -5%
56% / 37%
2100% / 972%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 201.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
154 Points ∼74% +12%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼74% +12%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
152 Points ∼73% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼71% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 (min: 144.66, max: 144.78) Points ∼70% +6%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points ∼70% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
141 Points ∼68% +3%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
137 Points ∼66%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼63% -4%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
93 Points ∼45% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼24% +28%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
576 (min: 544.28, max: 575.47) Points ∼19% 0%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
574 Points ∼18%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
558 (min: 546.34, max: 558) Points ∼18% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
519 Points ∼17% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼17% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
397 (min: 337, max: 397) Points ∼13% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
383 (min: 377, max: 385) Points ∼12% -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
367 Points ∼12% -36%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
301 Points ∼10% -48%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
1.84 Points ∼79% +20%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.77 Points ∼76% +16%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼74% +13%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
1.72 Points ∼74% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.61 Points ∼69% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
1.54 Points ∼66% +1%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.53 Points ∼65%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼65% -1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
1.1 Points ∼47% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼30% +25%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.46 Points ∼24%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
6.37 Points ∼24% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼22% -8%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.76 Points ∼21% -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
4.39 Points ∼16% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
4.09 Points ∼15% -37%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
3.64 Points ∼13% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.4 Points ∼13% -47%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
6501 Points ∼60% +58%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
6126 Points ∼57% +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
5595 Points ∼52% +36%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5528 Points ∼51% +35%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5433 Points ∼50% +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
5010 Points ∼46% +22%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
4676 Points ∼43% +14%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4103 Points ∼38%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
3033 Points ∼28% -26%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21839 Points ∼44% +52%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17971 Points ∼36% +25%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
16329 Points ∼33% +13%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
16094 Points ∼32% +12%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
14400 Points ∼29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
13779 Points ∼28% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
12799 Points ∼26% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
11403 Points ∼23% -21%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
9822 Points ∼20% -32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
492 s * ∼6% -96%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
473.575 s * ∼6% -89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
433 s * ∼5% -72%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
402.56 s * ∼5% -60%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
334.8 s * ∼4% -33%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
331.085 s * ∼4% -32%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
315.907 s * ∼4% -26%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
251.078 s * ∼3%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.96 s * ∼3% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
870.396 Seconds * ∼4% -27%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
684.933 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
654.006 Seconds * ∼3% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
626 Seconds * ∼3% +9%
1300X Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE Asus Prime B350-PLUS
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
619 Seconds * ∼3% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
594.092 Seconds * ∼3% +13%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
550.75 Seconds * ∼2% +20%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
509.5 Seconds * ∼2% +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8957
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
14400
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4103
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
35.55 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.46 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.53 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
51.36 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
137 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
574 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼63% +73%
HP 15-bs103ng
Radeon 520, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3925 Points ∼51% +39%
HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3802 Points ∼49% +35%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3802 Points ∼49% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3686 Points ∼47% +31%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3673 Points ∼47% +31%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
2814 Points ∼36%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
2080 Points ∼27% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3385 pontos
Ajuda
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
14653%
11981%
-5%
-8%
Write 4K
1.168
156
13256%
150
12742%
1.322
13%
1.171
0%
Read 4K
0.536
47.14
8695%
36
6616%
0.545
2%
0.422
-21%
Write Seq
114.1
1266
1010%
1057
826%
89.13
-22%
108.6
-5%
Read Seq
114.9
1419
1135%
1074
835%
91.44
-20%
106.3
-7%
Write 4K Q32T1
1.212
486
39999%
429
35296%
1.239
2%
1.145
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
1.189
586.4
49219%
441
36990%
1.548
30%
1.104
-7%
Write Seq Q32T1
113.2
1246
1001%
1283
1033%
90.29
-20%
107.4
-5%
Read Seq Q32T1
114.1
3431
2907%
1838
1511%
88.34
-23%
104.1
-9%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 63.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 140 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 105.6 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 16.9 ms
Índice de Explosão: 260.5 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 2.2 %
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
5062 Points ∼12% +106%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% +68%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +45%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7500U
2841 Points ∼7% +15%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2460 Points ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2340 Points ∼6% -5%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
1903 Points ∼5% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
1698 Points ∼4% -31%
HP 17-bs103ng
AMD Radeon 530, 8250U
1365 Points ∼3% -45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1315 Points ∼3% -47%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1030 Points ∼3% -58%
HP 15-bw075ax
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P
750 Points ∼2% -70%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
31294 Points ∼17% +92%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼14% +60%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼12% +38%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7500U
17750 Points ∼10% +9%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
16285 Points ∼9%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
14594 Points ∼8% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
13362 Points ∼7% -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
13153 Points ∼7% -19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
10486 Points ∼6% -36%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8599 Points ∼5% -47%
HP 17-bs103ng
AMD Radeon 530, 8250U
6266 Points ∼3% -62%
HP 15-bw075ax
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P
3477 Points ∼2% -79%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% +53%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼23% +41%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7500U
3575 Points ∼20% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2975 Points ∼17% +2%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2918 Points ∼17%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
2784 Points ∼16% -5%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
2742 Points ∼16% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2517 (min: 2509, max: 2525) Points ∼14% -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1968 Points ∼11% -33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1800 Points ∼10% -38%
HP 17-bs103ng
AMD Radeon 530, 8250U
1869 Points ∼11% -36%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1567 Points ∼9% -46%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
7794 Points ∼15% +116%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +34%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +18%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3602 Points ∼7%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 7500U
3459 Points ∼7% -4%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
3220 Points ∼6% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2849 Points ∼6% -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2761.5 (min: 2743, max: 2780) Points ∼5% -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2401 Points ∼5% -33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1980 Points ∼4% -45%
HP 17-bs103ng
AMD Radeon 530, 8250U
2320 Points ∼5% -36%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1613 Points ∼3% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
3759 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10601 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2262 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1091 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps ∼100% +75%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
34.8 fps ∼99% +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
23.9 fps ∼68% +20%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
20 fps ∼57%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
14.9 fps ∼43% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
12.5 fps ∼36% -37%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1
11.8 fps ∼34% -41%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
10 fps ∼29% -50%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
7.6 fps ∼22% -62%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
23.1 fps ∼100% +50%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.8 fps ∼81% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
16.4 fps ∼71% +6%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
15.4 fps ∼67%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
12.2 fps ∼53% -21%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7.4 fps ∼32% -52%
baixo média alto ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 72.312.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 114.420fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 6014.2fps
Thief (2014) 45.914fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 42.314fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 4216fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 603120fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 43.914.9fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 49.315.4fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 12.9fps
Overwatch (2016) 94.240fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 13fps
Prey (2017) 63.221.7fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 90.435.620.9fps
F1 2017 (2017) 602722fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546Tooltip
The Witcher 3 low

Barulho

Ocioso
32.3 / 32.4 / 34.2 dB
Carga
36.2 / 45.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
GeForce 930MX, 7500U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Noise
-4%
6%
1%
-2%
-3%
off / environment *
28.5
30
-5%
28.2
1%
28.5
-0%
30.2
-6%
31.6
-11%
Idle Minimum *
32.3
30
7%
28.2
13%
28.5
12%
33.8
-5%
31.6
2%
Idle Average *
32.4
33
-2%
28.2
13%
28.5
12%
33.9
-5%
31.6
2%
Idle Maximum *
34.2
37
-8%
28.2
18%
36.3
-6%
34.2
-0%
33.4
2%
Load Average *
36.2
41
-13%
39
-8%
42.7
-18%
36
1%
41.7
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.8
42
2%
Load Maximum *
45.3
50
-10%
46.3
-2%
42.7
6%
44
3%
44.8
1%

* ... smaller is better

 27.6 °C40 °C33 °C 
 25.8 °C33.4 °C31.4 °C 
 24 °C25 °C27.6 °C 
Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C
38.8 °C44 °C31.2 °C
37.2 °C34.2 °C29.6 °C
32 °C30 °C27.6 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  47.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.737.12535.134.73134.732.74031.932.65032.133.46332.231.3803131.810029.730.312528.829.516029.334.620028.845.525026.951.231526.656.940025.756.950024.759.563024.560.480025.563.9100023.763.212502465.5160023.863200023.956.2250023.556.9315023.755.4400023.955.9500023.960.6630023.658.7800023.654.81000023.550.21250023.549.31600023.738.4SPL36.272.3N2.729.8median 23.9median 56.2Delta1.36.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Envy x360 15m-bq121dxApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.47 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.9 / 8.7 / 10.5 Watt
Carga midlight 45.7 / 49.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
7500U, GeForce 930MX, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
8%
-26%
16%
-54%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
5.9
3.7
37%
8.14
-38%
5
15%
11.6
-97%
8.3
-41%
Idle Average *
8.7
7.5
14%
10.91
-25%
8.3
5%
13.8
-59%
10.2
-17%
Idle Maximum *
10.5
8
24%
12.26
-17%
7.8
26%
14.2
-35%
10.4
1%
Load Average *
45.7
49
-7%
45.67
-0%
28.8
37%
67.9
-49%
67.5
-48%
Load Maximum *
49.4
55.2
-12%
74.94
-52%
49.7
-1%
76.9
-56%
117.2
-137%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.8
50.6
-10%
59.04
-29%
96.5
-111%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 17min
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 72 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Battery Runtime
37%
53%
-2%
49%
23%
Reader / Idle
655
1066
63%
866
32%
635
-3%
934
43%
831
27%
WiFi v1.3
398
484
22%
535
34%
320
-20%
511
28%
434
9%
Load
77
96
25%
148
92%
89
16%
136
77%
103
34%

Pro

+ O desempenho da CPU é similar ao do i5-8250U, i7-8550U
+ Mais barato do que uma alternativa Intel Kaby Lake-R
+ Desempenho de GPU mais rápido do que o Iris Pro Graphics
+ Desempenho de CPU estável; sem afogamentos
+ Bateria maior que a do modelo de 2016
+ Design atraente com marco fino
+ Base sólida; tampa relativamente rígida
+ Desempenho por Watt potente
+ USB Type-C Gen.1

Contra

- Tiraram a porta RJ-45 e uma porta USB Type-A a menos que o modelo de 2016
- Desempenho gráfico mais pobre do que o esperado durante os jogos
- Modulação da largura de pulso, se não estiver no brilho máximo
- Rangidos leves; não tão forte quanto o Spectre x360 15
- Desempenho WLAN 2x2 mais lento que o do equivalente da Intel
- Visibilidade pobre em exteriores; a tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Frequentes falhas no sistema; controladores pobres da tela
- Ventoinha do sistema sempre ativa; pulsação frequente
- Desempenho lento do sistema; HD principal
- Gama de cores estreita; cores imprecisas
- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou DisplayPort
- O trackpad poderia ser mais firme
- Acessibilidade difícil
In review: HP Envy x360 15m-bq1xx
In review: HP Envy x360 15m-bq1xx

Since this is the first commercially available notebook equipped with Raven Ridge, our verdict can be split into two parts. The first part relates to the AMD hardware itself. On paper, the 25 W cTDP Ryzen 5 2500U APU and RX Vega 8 GPU are able to stand neck-to-neck with current 15 W Kaby Lake-R options (i5-8250, i7-8550U) while outperforming even the Iris Pro Graphics 580 in synthetic benchmarks. Combine this with the generally lower price tag and there is seemingly no reason to choose Intel over AMD with all else being equal.

Dado que este é o primeiro portátil comercialmente disponível equipado com Raven Ridge, nosso veredicto pode ser dividido em duas partes. A primeira parte diz respeito ao próprio hardware da AMD. No papel, a APU cTDP Ryzen 5 2500U de 25 W e a GPU RX Vega 8 podem competir lado a lado com as opções atuais Kaby Lake-R de 15 W (i5-8250, i7-8550U), superando mesmo o Iris Pro Graphics 580 em benchmarks sintéticas. Combine isso com o preço geralmente menor e, aparentemente, não há motivo para escolher a Intel sobre a AMD, com todo o resto sendo igual.

Infelizmente para a AMD, todo o resto não é igual o Raven Ridge simplesmente não está pronto para o horário nobre. Nossa unidade de teste é extraordinariamente lenta e sofre de erros aleatórios. Em particular, o sistema falharia com mais frequência ao estressar a GPU ou rodar jogos semelhantes à geração anterior de portáteis AMD Dual Graphics, como no Asus FX550IU. Os benchmarks sintéticos podem revelar o Vega 8 para ser mais rápido do que o antigo GeForce 940MX, mas o contrário é verdadeiro ao rodar a maioria dos jogos modernos. Este é o AMD clássico para o melhor ou o pior - excelente desempenho por dólar que, em última instância, é estragado por controladores e suporte para desenvolvedores inferiores.

Os potenciais compradores que são atraídos pelo impressionante desempenho do processador encontrarão o preço mais baixo atrativo sobre um equivalente Intel Kaby Lake-R. Por outro lado, os jogadores só encontrarão decepção no RX Vega 8 até que seus controladores sejam atualizados. Pode ser mais do dobro de poderoso do que o UHD Graphics 620 em testes sintéticos, mas o MX150 ainda é o melhor investimento para jogos em 1080p.

A segunda parte do nosso veredicto é sobre o portátil HP como um todo. O fabricante incorporou com sucesso os marcos estreitos da classe Spectre em sua linha Envy que é mais elegante e tão dura quanto a geração de saída. Além do redesenho do chassi, no entanto, não muito melhorou. Essa era a chance da HP de aprimorar todos os aspectos da série Envy x360 15, mas, em vez disso, temos a mesma tela táctil escura de 1080p, espaço de cores limitado e características PWM como modelo do ano passado. Os alto-falantes, o leitor SD, o teclado, o trackpad, as dobradiças, o peso total e o ruído do ventilador pulsante também não foram melhorados tangivelmente sobre o modelo 2016. A maior aposta, então, é o aspecto mais fino e talvez a duração da bateria ligeiramente mais longa e o USB Type-C Gen. 1 porta neste redesenho recente.

A nova plataforma Raven Ridge da AMD é uma conquista louvável, mas é uma pena que sofra dos mesmos problemas de software e de controladores que ocorrem há muitos anos neste fabricante de chips. Não podemos recomendar este sistema HP AMD baseado em HD, pelo menos até que as falhas da GPU tenham sido corrigidas.

HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx - 11/30/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
69%
Conectividade
46 / 80 → 57%
Peso
62 / 35-78 → 62%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
77%
Desempenho do jogos
69 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 87 → 99%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
80%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Médio
73%
77%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy x360 15 (Ryzen 5 2500U, Radeon Vega 8)
Allen Ngo, 2017-12- 9 (Update: 2017-12-22)