C 2018
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6)

Sven Kloevekorn, 👁 Florian Glaser, Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/03/2018

GTX 1060 liberado. O novíssimo Core i7-8700 hexa-core para desktop da Intel é claramente a estrela do novo portátil Apex de 15 polegadas da Schenker. É um grande para um portátil de jogos e é acompanhado por uma rápida GPU GeForce GTX 1060. O portátil não tem suporte para o G-Sync, mas oferece uma conectividade abundante em troca. Infelizmente, ele sofre de um problema completamente alheio aos jogos.

Schenker XMG Apex 15
Processador
Intel Core i7-8700
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 391.24, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4, 2400 MHz, Dual-Channel, 2 de 2 slots em uso, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, FHD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe, 250 GB 
, + Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172, 1 TB HDD, 5,400 rpm. Slots: 2x M.2-2280 & 1x 2,5-polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Union Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x áudio em (3,5 mm), 1x saída de áudio (3.5 mm), Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 378 x 267
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 6-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, 3-zone RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 250 W power supply, 16 GB USB thumb drive with drivers and manuals, external recovery media disk, "Device Drivers & Utilities + User's Manual" disk, XMG stickers, quick start guide and safety guidelines, warranty booklet, spare screws, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.79 kg, Suprimento de energia: 898 g
Preço
1659 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15

Size Comparison

lefr side: fan vents, USB 3.1 Gen 2, USB 2.0, audio-in (microphone), audio-out (headphones)
lefr side: fan vents, USB 3.1 Gen 2, USB 2.0, audio-in (microphone), audio-out (headphones)
right side: card reader, USB 3.1 Gen 1, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, ethernet, power. Kensington lock
right side: card reader, USB 3.1 Gen 1, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, ethernet, power. Kensington lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
178 MB/s ∼100% +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=200)
89.9 MB/s ∼51% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼47%
Schenker XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼45% -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.5 MB/s ∼41% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼100% +127%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=198)
109 MB/s ∼55% +24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼44%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.5 MB/s ∼44% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼44% -1%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
672 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=169)
594 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
546 MBit/s ∼80% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
633 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
540 MBit/s ∼85% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=169)
530 MBit/s ∼84% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
499 MBit/s ∼79%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
373 MBit/s ∼59% -25%
267
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 290 cd/m² Médio: 274.4 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 269 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
83% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Schenker XMG Apex 15
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15t-ce000
AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 3840x2160
Schenker XMG Core 15
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
60%
17%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 (20.4, 22)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
77%
37.6 (19.6, 18)
11%
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (18, 14)
7.2 (5, 2.2)
77%
24.8 (12.4, 12.4)
22%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
5%
PWM Frequency
20490 (99)
26000 (25)
27%
20490 (95)
0%
Screen
12%
-5%
-11%
Brightness middle
269
285
6%
358.5
33%
297
10%
Brightness
274
273
0%
350
28%
276
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
95
4%
87
-4%
Black Level *
0.23
0.23
-0%
0.39
-70%
0.3
-30%
Contrast
1170
1239
6%
919
-21%
990
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.25
3.52
17%
4.6
-8%
5.25
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.39
5.18
50%
8.5
18%
10.3
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.51
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.11
3.41
-10%
5.2
-67%
4.64
-49%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.05 107%
2.28 96%
2.39 92%
CCT
6851 95%
7077 92%
6410 101%
6600 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
77
43%
66.9
24%
54
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
100
20%
91.8
11%
83
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
36% / 23%
6% / -1%
-4% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20490 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
197 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700
  (190 - 197, n=2)
194 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=407)
151 Points ∼77% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
1215 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700
  (1167 - 1215, n=2)
1191 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=408)
738 Points ∼61% -39%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼60% -40%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
729 Points ∼60% -40%
Schenker XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
722 Points ∼59% -41%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7257
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
38543
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
197 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1215 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5653 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
 
5653 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5332 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5270 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=304)
4912 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
2484 Points ∼44% -56%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4697 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
 
4697 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4626 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4406 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4325 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=322)
4214 Points ∼90% -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4697 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5653 pontos
Ajuda
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
HP Omen 15t-ce000
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Schenker XMG Core 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-59%
-40%
-12%
-4%
Write 4k QD32
570.7
190.3
-67%
173.9
-70%
481.9
-16%
511 (410 - 579, n=6)
-10%
Read 4k QD32
675.6
368.8
-45%
517.6
-23%
577.2
-15%
617 (481 - 711, n=6)
-9%
Write 4k
164.1
88.91
-46%
130.7
-20%
134
-18%
142 (77.5 - 174, n=6)
-13%
Read 4k
59.96
21.77
-64%
46.09
-23%
58.35
-3%
54.2 (34.4 - 60, n=6)
-10%
Write 512
1007
409.9
-59%
174
-83%
1006
0%
1065 (860 - 1246, n=6)
6%
Read 512
791.8
411.9
-48%
503.3
-36%
779.8
-2%
880 (710 - 1088, n=6)
11%
Write Seq
1375
441.4
-68%
748.8
-46%
1188
-14%
1408 (1188 - 1563, n=6)
2%
Read Seq
1751
506.6
-71%
1411
-19%
1338
-24%
1642 (1338 - 1920, n=6)
-6%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Sequential Read: 1751 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1375 MB/s
512K Read: 791.8 MB/s
512K Write: 1007 MB/s
4K Read: 59.96 MB/s
4K Write: 164.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 675.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 570.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17793 Points ∼100% +47%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
12138 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (10708 - 12298, n=71)
11531 Points ∼65% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11322 Points ∼64% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=436)
10245 Points ∼58% -16%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
9992 Points ∼56% -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23246 Points ∼100% +53%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15149 Points ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (12731 - 15607, n=71)
14718 Points ∼63% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14471 Points ∼62% -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
12970 Points ∼56% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=509)
11830 Points ∼51% -22%
3DMark 11 Performance
14618 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36010 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10794 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
62.2 fps ∼100% +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=211)
44.9 fps ∼72% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
41.9 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (31.3 - 42.3, n=55)
38.7 fps ∼62% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.2 fps ∼61% -9%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
35 fps ∼56% -16%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
77.6 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=176)
75.6 fps ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
69.57 fps ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
68.5 fps ∼88% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (52.6 - 80.6, n=44)
67.7 fps ∼87% -13%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
102.5 fps ∼100% +51%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
67.9 fps ∼66%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 126, n=138)
62.5 fps ∼61% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (51 - 68.8, n=33)
61 fps ∼60% -10%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
59.36 fps ∼58% -13%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
54.6 fps ∼53% -20%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
118.8 fps ∼100% +56%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
76.1 fps ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (65.3 - 82, n=21)
72.8 fps ∼61% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
71.05 fps ∼60% -7%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
67.6 fps ∼57% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.6 - 154, n=104)
67.4 fps ∼57% -11%
The Division
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (7.6 - 124, n=38)
60.6 fps ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
56.7 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (37.8 - 57.4, n=7)
50.7 fps ∼84% -11%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x
Average of class Gaming
  (10.1 - 138, n=38)
75.6 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
72.8 fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (46.9 - 73.3, n=6)
64.3 fps ∼85% -12%
For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
113 fps ∼100% +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (40.6 - 182, n=25)
102 fps ∼90% +29%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
78.9 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (42.4 - 78.9, n=8)
68.6 fps ∼61% -13%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
144.4 fps ∼100% +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.8 - 194, n=26)
128 fps ∼89% +24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
103.2 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (56.3 - 103, n=7)
92.6 fps ∼64% -10%
Ghost Recon Wildlands
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
52.2 fps ∼100% +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (2.4 - 82.7, n=27)
44.7 fps ∼86% +16%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
38.7 fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (34.5 - 38.7, n=6)
36.9 fps ∼71% -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
90.8 fps ∼100% +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.8 - 122, n=27)
78.4 fps ∼86% +16%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
67.8 fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (60.1 - 67.8, n=6)
64.8 fps ∼71% -4%
Assassin´s Creed Origins
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (28 - 86, n=19)
57.3 fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
56 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (42 - 56, n=5)
49.8 fps ∼87% -11%
1920x1080 High Preset
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
66 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 107, n=20)
64.6 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (49 - 66, n=5)
59.4 fps ∼90% -10%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (18.6 - 80, n=21)
49.3 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
47.3 fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (37.2 - 47.3, n=5)
41.5 fps ∼84% -12%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
62.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (58.6 - 62.4, n=2)
60.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.2 - 86, n=9)
53.7 fps ∼86% -14%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=21)
69.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
64 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (59 - 65, n=5)
63.2 fps ∼91% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 120, n=21)
74.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700
69 fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (62 - 69, n=5)
67.2 fps ∼91% -3%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 77.641.9fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 118fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 76.167.9fps
The Division (2016) 72.856.7fps
For Honor (2017) 108.3103.278.9fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 67.838.7fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 746656fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 62.447.3fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 756964fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 33 / 38 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
47 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
 46 °C50 °C45 °C 
 47 °C50 °C45 °C 
 41 °C43 °C40 °C 
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 45.2 °C
44 °C48 °C47 °C
42 °C49 °C47 °C
32 °C34 °C31 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.342.82536.940.53130.833.54032.738.75026.829.56326.628.28030.135.410029.23812526.135.416023.629.620025.732.125027.840.331521.249.540019.955.850018.455.563018.357.880017.761.9100018.768.4125018.373.7160017.373.6200017.469.3250017.468.4315017.567.6400017.367.7500017.566.9630017.466.1800017.567.81000017.460.41250017.361.71600017.254.9SPL30.480.8N1.545median 17.7median 61.7Delta2.610.743.951.139.24631.940.637.443.928.8412845.528.654.226.168.123.164.822.272.223.274.8237319.872.51975.817.67317.877.817.682.817.182.717.380.217.283.816.98417.582.117.981.317.877.517.476.517.681.917.479.917.775.518.873.617.368.529.9931.3107.1median 17.7median 76.51.64.334.839.136.636.533.434.832.933.631.832.230.831.129.731.729.630.128.529.227.438.827.153.226.458.32657.42558.924.353.524.360.724.365.524.262.923.960.723.561.523.257.223.15822.754.423.155.522.963.222.764.722.463.322.56222.465.122.554.335.673.42.533.1median 23.9median 58.31.34.74345.436.739.929.431.834.140.527.23024.829.525.738.825.439.822.234.221.644.222.748.822.452.519.853.118.350.817.361.117.269.517.172.716.866.316.863.516.960.416.858.717.155.51751.216.95317.153.517.156.617.258.517.554.117.843.417.134.929.475.31.232.1median 17.2median 53.51.95.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Apex 15MSI GE63VR 7RF RaiderHP Omen 15t-ce000Schenker XMG Core 15
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG Core 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7 / 10 / 14 Watt
Carga midlight 114 / 164 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Apex 15
8700, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 15t-ce000
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Core 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-38%
-57%
-93%
Idle Minimum *
7
11
-57%
15.4
-120%
18
-157%
20.3 (3.9 - 113, n=597)
-190%
Idle Average *
10
16
-60%
22.4
-124%
22
-120%
25.9 (6.8 - 119, n=597)
-159%
Idle Maximum *
14
21
-50%
22.4
-60%
26
-86%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=597)
-121%
Load Average *
114
92
19%
78.1
31%
93
18%
105 (14.1 - 319, n=588)
8%
Load Maximum *
164
224
-37%
133.52
19%
175
-7%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=587)
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
131
185
-41%
97.5
26%
119
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 50min
Schenker XMG Apex 15
8700, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 51 Wh
HP Omen 15t-ce000
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Schenker XMG Core 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-49%
-37%
-29%
-29%
Reader / Idle
575
323
-44%
298
-48%
300
-48%
328 (39 - 1174, n=586)
-43%
H.264
304
234
-23%
244 (88 - 506, n=121)
-20%
WiFi v1.3
334
201
-40%
208
-38%
282
-16%
250 (78 - 622, n=262)
-25%
Load
110
42
-62%
83
-25%
80
-27%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=554)
-29%

Pro

+ Extensamente configurável
+ Conectividade abundante
+ Fácil manutenção
+ Teclado de jogos de boa aparência com luz de fundo RGB, efeitos e macros
+ Baixo valor de preto, alto contraste
+ Ângulos de visão decentes
+ Desempenho do sistema extremamente alto
+ SSD veloz
+ Desempenho da GTX 1060 acima da média
+ Baixo consumo de energia em modo inativo
+ Duração decente da bateria para um portátil de jogos

Contra

- Comparativamente grande e pesado
- Tampa da tela não particularmente bem feita e instável
- Bleeding da tela
- Distorções na tela ao tocar a tela
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela
- Desempenho pobre do som
Schenker XMG Apex 15. Review unit courtesy of Schenker Germany.
Schenker XMG Apex 15. Review unit courtesy of Schenker Germany.

Concedido, o CPU Core i7-8700 da Schenker XMG Apex 15 é demais quando se olha exclusivamente para os requisitos de jogos. No entanto, isso não necessariamente tem que ser uma coisa ruim, dado que as desvantagens usuais, como maior consumo de energia e um ruído de sistema mais pronunciado, estavam suspeitosamente ausentes neste caso.

Tudo considerado o Apex 15 é um portátil divertido. Se não fosse pelo design da tampa ruim.

A um preço aproximado de 1.700 Euros, você obtém um sólido portátil para jogos sem extras, como G-Sync ou Thunderbolt 3. Se você não espera ir além da FHD em um futuro próximo, a GTX 1060 vai durar mais alguns anos, especialmente considerando que o Apex 15 apresenta uma das implementações mais rápidas da GTX 1060 disponíveis atualmente.

Sua conectividade diferencia o portátil de muitos de seus concorrentes e suas opções de manutenção são quase ideais. É verdade que a tela não possui recursos de jogos dedicados aos quais nos acostumamos. No entanto, faz um bom trabalho. A CPU rápida é acompanhada por um SSD muito rápido, e o baixo consumo de energia do portátil resulta em uma longa duração da bateria. A maioria das desvantagens circula ao redor da tela ou, mais especificamente, o design da tampa da tela. Enquanto nós simplesmente não podemos entender quais escolhas levaram a este projeto pobre, o dispositivo ainda merece nosso endosso total. Se você precisa de ainda mais potência 3D, vale a pena dar uma olhada no portátil MSI alimentado pela GTX 1070. No entanto, tome cuidado com o painel TN deste portátil.

Schenker XMG Apex 15 - 04/28/2018 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
83%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Temperatura
81 / 95 → 85%
Ruído
67 / 90 → 74%
Audio
50%
Camera
63 / 85 → 74%
Médio
76%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2018-05- 3 (Update: 2018-05- 6)