XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) revisão de laptop: Para jogadores resistentes ao ruído

Name: SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
Brand: SCHENKER

AMD encontra a Nvidia. O XMG Apex 17 é um notebook para jogos de 17 polegadas da Schenker Technologies que conta com uma forte CPU Ryzen e uma potente GPU GeForce. O maior destaque é a bateria removível, o maior inconveniente é o desenvolvimento de ruídos altos.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/14/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

Como é conhecido da Schenker Technologies, o dispositivo pode ser configurado extensivamente na loja virtual interna bestware.com. Enquanto o processador ou é um Ryzen 7 5800H ou um Ryzen 9 5900HXa placa gráfica é uma GeForce RTX 3060 com VRAM de 6 GB ou uma GeForce RTX 3070 com VRAM de 8 GB. Em ambos os casos, um visor IPS mate 144 Hz cuida da reprodução da imagem. A memória de trabalho DDR4 varia de 8 a um máximo de 64 GB (2x SO-DIMM). Caso contrário, a caixa de 17 polegadas acomoda até dois M.2 SSDs (PCIe 3.0 x4). Os compradores também podem influenciar o módulo WLAN, o idioma do teclado e o sistema operacional.

O preço do Apex 17 começa em 1.479 Euros (~$1.692). Nossa configuração de teste com Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070, 32 GB de duplo canal de RAM e 1 TB SSD custaria atualmente mais de 2.000 Euros (~$2.289).

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 (XMG Apex Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1560 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, ForceWare 472.12, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, two slots (both in use)

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, Full-HD, FreeSync, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, NVMe, two M.2-slots (one in use)

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC293 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 Headset, 1 Mic

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 32.4 x 396 x 262

Bateria

49 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230 W Power Supply, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.56 kg, Suprimento de energia: 688 g

Preço

2079 EUR

Links

SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Os concorrentes do Apex 17 incluem outros notebooks de 17 polegadas com o RTX 3070, como o Lâmina Razer 17o MSI GP76o Acer Nitro 5 AN517 e o interno XMG Neo 17. Todos esses laptops aparecem nas tabelas como dispositivos de comparação

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.4 %	11/2021	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	32.4 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 %	01/2021	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
89.4 %	09/2021	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 %	03/2021	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.3 %	08/2021	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	24.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Como o Apex 17 é quase idêntico em construção ao recentemente testado Gigabyte A7 X1 (Clevo barebone), não iremos mais longe no caso, no equipamento e nos dispositivos de entrada deste artigo. Você pode encontrar as informações correspondentes na revisão vinculada.

Size comparison

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 DIN A4 ❌

Comunicação

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s +62%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1310 MBit/s +57%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1239 (1143^min - 1322^max) MBit/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s +36%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s +32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921	845 (560^min - 969^max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	835 (582^min - 967^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1491 (1415^min - 1540^max) MBit/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s +32%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s +22%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1038 (584^min - 1179^max) MBit/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921	140 (33^min - 562^max) MBit/s -87%

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (584-1179)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (582-967)

Webcam

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21: 9.71 ∆E min: 2.78 - max: 14.05 ∆E

Mostrar

A tela utilizada difere da A7 X1 apesar de especificações básicas idênticas (Full HD, 144 Hz, IPS). Ao invés de um painel AU Optronics, o notebook Schenker utiliza um painel da LG Philips, que infelizmente não corresponde bem ao homólogo Gigabyte. Além da luminosidade, o contraste também é mais fraco. Uma média de 285 cd/m² e 823:1 são bastante baixos na faixa de preço de cerca de 2000 euros (~$2.289). O painel QHD do XMG Neo 17 com 381 cd/m² e 1108:1 mostra como ele pode ser melhor.

Por outro lado, há mais pontos para o curto tempo de resposta e o espaço de cor decente. 96% sRGB é completamente suficiente para um caderno de jogos. A reprodução de cores também dificilmente pode ser criticada, embora melhorias ainda possam ser alcançadas via calibração (nosso arquivo ICC está vinculado abaixo). A estabilidade do ângulo de visão está no nível típico do IPS, portanto, é boa


294 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	289 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	292 cd/m²	284 cd/m²
275 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	275 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 294 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 292 cd/m²
Contraste: 823:1 (Preto: 0.355 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.298

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		7%	8%	1%	-43%
Display P3 Coverage	65	70.5 8%	71.7 10%	64.7 0%	36.7 -44%
sRGB Coverage	95.9	99.5 4%	98.8 3%	96.4 1%	55.3 -42%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.8	71.8 9%	73.6 12%	66.9 2%	37.9 -42%
Response Times		-4%	44%	24%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -11%	4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6) 72%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 51%	18 ?(8, 10) -18%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(6, 4.4)	10 ?(4, 6) 4%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 15%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -4%	14 ?(7, 7) -35%
PWM Frequency				24510 ?(39)
Screen		15%	-22%	22%	-19%
Brightness middle	292	410 40%	323.3 11%	328 12%	282 -3%
Brightness	285	381 34%	315 11%	314 10%	255 -11%
Brightness Distribution	94	88 -6%	91 -3%	87 -7%	85 -10%
Black Level *	0.355	0.37 -4%	0.33 7%	0.29 18%	0.24 32%
Contrast	823	1108 35%	980 19%	1131 37%	1175 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.47	2.55 -3%	4.59 -86%	1.93 22%	5.91 -139%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.69	4.33 50%	10.82 -25%	4.94 43%	10.98 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.96	1.28 -33%	1.4 -46%	0.68 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	3.4 21%	7.9 -84%	2.8 35%	5.85 -36%
Gamma	2.298 ^96%	2.275 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	2.18 ^101%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	7000 ^93%	6637 ^98%	5941 ^109%	7023 ^93%	7372 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		72		67	35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		95		89	55
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 11%	10% / -6%	16% / 18%	-30% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Condições de teste

Vários ajustes do sistema podem ser feitos no Centro de Controle pré-carregado, que vem do fabricante de barebone Clevo. Estes incluem o controle do ventilador e o perfil de desempenho. Para obter a máxima potência do Apex 17, usamos o modo Performance para nossos testes (apenas as medições da bateria foram realizadas no modo Entertainment). Deixamos a configuração de velocidade do ventilador na opção padrão Automático.

Nota: Para evitar que o Windows 11, que foi instalado no dispositivo de teste, influenciasse negativamente os resultados do benchmark, aguardamos o mais recente driver da placa mãe da AMD e uma certa atualização da Microsoft (bug no cache L3 da palavra-chave).

Energia

Não importa qual CPU ou GPU você escolher para a configuração: O Apex 17 tende para o segmento high-end. Para estar adequadamente preparado para o futuro, recomendamos 16 GB de RAM e um mínimo de 500 GB de SSD. A configuração básica é extremamente escassa a este respeito (8 GB & 250 GB).

Processador

O Ryzen 7 5800H instalado na amostra de revisão é um processador de oito núcleos extremamente rápido que pode processar até 16 roscas em paralelo via SMT. Não houve surpresas desagradáveis em nosso curso de referência. As pontuações do Cinebench estão todas em um alto nível e podem se manter contra a concorrência. O desempenho também se manteve bastante estável no teste Loop (comparar gráfico)

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance Test

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1865 (1855.12-1943.35)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2006 (1963-2025.09)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	85.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	65.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	63 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H	62.2 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	60.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	60.5 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG ^-2! Intel Core i7-10750H	46.2 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19581 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12693 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	12316 (11587.2^min - 12316.3^max) Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	12262 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29)	11794 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11739 Points -8%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1816 Points +27%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	1504 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1431 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1429 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29)	1410 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1403 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4925 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4742 Points -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	4724 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31)	4568 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4510 Points -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	2998 Points -39%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points +25%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	580 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	560 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	556 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30)	550 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	540 Points -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	460 Points -18%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2108 (2036.87^min - 2108.48^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2086 (2064.09^min - 2085.83^max) Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2025 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28)	1963 Points -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	1943 (1855.12^min - 1943.35^max) Points -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1258 (1113.24^min - 1257.82^max) Points -40%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	233 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	229 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29)	228 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	227 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points -15%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * -48%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29)	260 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	256 Seconds * -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	250 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	245 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	242 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * +18%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77274 MIPS +29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	59986 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	57284 MIPS -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	54596 MIPS -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28)	54117 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	52870 MIPS -12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	36161 MIPS -40%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6133 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5590 MIPS +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5588 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5535 MIPS
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	5472 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29)	5472 MIPS -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	5236 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13627 Points +50%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	9062 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8035 Points -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28)	7793 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7472 Points -18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	6392 Points -29%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1811 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1505 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1464 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28)	1450 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1354 Points -10%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1304 Points -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	16 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.6 fps -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.1 fps -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	15.1 fps -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)	14.5 fps -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	77.6 s * -59%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29)	64.3 s * -32%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	50.9 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	50.8 s * -4%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	48.7 s *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	44.1 s * +9%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	0.592 sec * -16%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H	0.555 sec * -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)	0.525 sec * -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.514 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.512 sec * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.511 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.4687 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2086 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

162 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

233 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	97.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	84.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	82.4 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	78.8 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	49.9 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 ^-9! Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18634 KRay/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14927 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14420 KRay/s -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14345 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29)	13933 KRay/s -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	9268 KRay/s -38%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94105 Points
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	93571 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92324 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	90996 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29)	87478 Points -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	45746 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4332 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3223 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3199 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	3100 MB/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29)	2979 MB/s -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2170 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109573 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	98276 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	97095 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29)	95793 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	95346 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	72096 Points -26%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12203 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11871 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11720 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	11633 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29)	11517 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7581 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	51658 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	50532 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	50136 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29)	48035 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	47882 Points -7%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	22957 Points -56%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	124712 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	123873 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	122777 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29)	114346 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	107712 MB/s -14%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	28667 MB/s -77%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1213 MB/s +53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	803 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	795 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	793 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29)	768 MB/s -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	557 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10089 KRay/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7617 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7508 KRay/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7439 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29)	7343 KRay/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	5050 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36818 MPixel/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	25421 MPixel/s
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	21748 MPixel/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	19926 MPixel/s -22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29)	17883 MPixel/s -30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	15341 MPixel/s -40%

Desempenho do sistema

O desempenho do sistema parece igualmente bom. O Apex 17 também ocupa um dos primeiros lugares aqui, embora os dispositivos concorrentes ainda tenham sido testados com o Windows 10, o que pode significar certos desvios.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7311 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6972 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6717 - 6983, n=6)	6846 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	6749 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	6017 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10832 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	10226 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	10131 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9548 - 10226, n=6)	10028 Points -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8652 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	9205 Points +1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9149 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9136 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8849 - 9514, n=6)	9133 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8657 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +17%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10701 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9847 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8948 - 10389, n=6)	9523 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	8948 Points -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7893 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		6972 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59453 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	44180 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	41437 MB/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29)	39512 MB/s -11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	35427 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63375 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46438 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	45431 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29)	44498 MB/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	40473 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61670 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	47022 MB/s
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	41034 MB/s -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29)	37769 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37145 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94 ns * -17%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29)	83.3 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.3 ns *
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	57.2 ns * +29%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

Há espaço para melhorias em termos de latências. De acordo com a ferramenta LatencyMon, o Apex 17 não é realmente adequado para edição de áudio e/ou vídeo em tempo real em seu estado de entrega, se tais cenários de aplicação forem planejados (deve se aplicar apenas a muito poucos compradores)

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1454 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1164 μs * +20%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1082 μs * +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	395.1 μs * +73%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

Nosso dispositivo de teste tinha a bordo um SSD de 1 TB da Samsung como armazenamento em massa. Como de costume, o 970 Evo Plus proporciona um desempenho de sucesso em todos os sentidos - seja na leitura ou na escrita. Se você quiser expandir o armazenamento mais tarde, há um slot M.2 livre sob o capô

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	93.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	66.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	65.9 pt
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	63.4 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	47.8 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	32.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3167 (2857.53^min - 3167.08^max) MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2874 (2868.48^min - 2874.36^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2818 (2809.93^min - 2818.13^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (338 - 2999, n=15)	2475 MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1156 (1142.97^min - 1155.53^max) MB/s -59%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1089 (1045.84^min - 1088.76^max) MB/s -61%
seq write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3840 (3826.15^min - 3839.76^max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2993 (2988.23^min - 2992.64^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2898 (2889.78^min - 2897.77^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (209 - 3244, n=15)	2645 MB/s -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	978 (969.51^min - 977.62^max) MB/s -66%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	548 (546.68^min - 547.73^max) MB/s -81%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6653 (6275.76^min - 6652.91^max) MB/s +87%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s +80%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3558 (3389^min - 3557.8^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3558 (3270.93^min - 3558.01^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (456 - 3562, n=15)	3291 MB/s -8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1957 (251.74^min - 1957.34^max) MB/s -45%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1654 (1469.05^min - 1653.6^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4921 (4905.7^min - 4920.56^max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3248 (3242^min - 3248.28^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3226 (3218.01^min - 3226.42^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (202 - 3327, n=15)	3081 MB/s -4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	976 (973.29^min - 976.37^max) MB/s -70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	548 (546.94^min - 547.99^max) MB/s -83%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	78.2 (77.75^min - 78.19^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	59 (58.85^min - 58.97^max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	52.2 (51.61^min - 52.19^max) MB/s -33%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (13.7 - 78.2, n=15)	50.9 MB/s -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	46.2 (46.1^min - 46.22^max) MB/s -41%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	44.2 (43.82^min - 44.16^max) MB/s -43%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	182 (180.97^min - 181.81^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	178 (177.49^min - 178.18^max) MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	170 (169.81^min - 170.42^max) MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (39.8 - 232, n=15)	160.1 MB/s -12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	138 (137.1^min - 137.96^max) MB/s -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	131 (129.84^min - 130.68^max) MB/s -28%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4180 (4177.07^min - 4179.97^max) MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	3256 (3252.29^min - 3256.47^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (97.3 - 3256, n=15)	1929 MB/s -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1147 (1144.15^min - 1146.92^max) MB/s -65%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	412 (411.05^min - 412.02^max) MB/s -87%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	314 (313.08^min - 313.7^max) MB/s -90%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 (3290.66^min - 3545.47^max) MB/s +275%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2637 (2632.02^min - 2637.43^max) MB/s +179%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (140.4 - 2685, n=15)	2317 MB/s +145%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +128%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	978 (971.43^min - 977.69^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	945 (941.72^min - 944.77^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	547 (544.27^min - 547.32^max) MB/s -42%

AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8874 Points +70%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	5842 Points +12%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (4450 - 6452, n=18)	5812 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5429 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5218 Points
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	2130 Points -59%
Score Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3300 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2708 Points
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2186 Points -19%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1846 - 2708, n=18)	2171 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1773 Points -35%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	680 Points -75%
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3963 Points +249%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +175%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2759 Points +143%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2546 Points +125%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1134 - 2923, n=18)	2539 Points +124%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1134 Points
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1121 Points -1%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5302 MB/s +79%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3020 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2964 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2891 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (2173 - 3002, n=18)	2800 MB/s -6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1659 MB/s -44%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3977 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2692 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2687 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (2469 - 2858, n=18)	2633 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2631 MB/s -2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	921 MB/s -66%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	71.1 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	60.3 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	55 MB/s -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	52.6 MB/s -26%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (27.9 - 71.1, n=18)	51.2 MB/s -28%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	51 MB/s -28%
4K Write
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	171.6 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	157.7 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	148.7 MB/s -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	134.9 MB/s -14%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (86.3 - 188.1, n=18)	131.2 MB/s -17%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	120.1 MB/s -24%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2715 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	2340 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	1845 MB/s -21%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (1579 - 2340, n=18)	1839 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1410 MB/s -40%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	463.5 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3416 MB/s +382%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +259%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2324 MB/s +228%
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB (708 - 2512, n=18)	2144 MB/s +203%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N	2142 MB/s +203%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	909 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	708 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3571 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3227 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 618 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 359.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2826 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2889 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 76.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 172 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Placa gráfica

O desempenho da geração de amperes da Nvidia depende muito do conjunto TGP. Schenker dá ao RTX 3070 um total de 140 watts em modo de desempenho (incluindo 15 watts de Dynamic Boost), que é o valor máximo para esta GPU. Assim, não é surpreendente que o Apex 17 tenha uma pontuação bastante boa nos benchmarks gráficos. Analógico ao desempenho da CPU e do sistema, o Apex 17 também se torna confortável no terço superior do campo de teste aqui

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	94.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	89.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	78.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	66.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	38275 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	37405 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	36224 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54)	32331 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27613 Points -26%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points +9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	29128 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27968 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27138 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	27114 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52)	24302 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	20874 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10898 Points +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10850 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10797 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	10595 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53)	9300 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7901 Points -27%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)	7720 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6540 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6427 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	6391 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1640 - 6542, n=39)	5689 Points -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4835 Points -26%

3DMark 11 Performance		28685 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47429 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24012 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		10640 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Desempenho do jogo

Na resolução nativa Full HD de 1.920 x 1.080, o RTX 3070 pode exibir sem problemas todos os jogos atuais com o máximo de detalhes. Mesmo jogos particularmente exigentes geralmente chegam a mais de 60 FPS. O Apex 17 ainda se administraria bem com uma tela externa de QHD

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years)	220 fps +26%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	204.8 (183^min) fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	187 (5.75^min, 70.6^P0.1, 128^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	174 (147^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (122.1 - 207, n=34)	168 fps -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	135 (16.7^min, 43^P0.1, 83.5^P1) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +17%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H	109 (83^min) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	101 fps +1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H	100.6 (94^min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	100 (85^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52)	91.8 fps -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H	78.4 (34.9^min, 42.9^P0.1, 53.9^P1) fps -22%

Durante o teste de resistência com O Witcher 3 (1 hora @FHD/Ultra) não houve anormalidades. A taxa de quadros permaneceu bastante estável durante todo o período, como deveria.

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø99.8 (95-102)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø97.3 (86-100)

Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø93.6 (89-99)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø107 (96-112)

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø78.2 (75-81)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)		172	158	92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)		262	174	100
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	148	135	127	122
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		132	100
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	104	91.9	75
Far Cry 5 (2018)		124	119	110
Strange Brigade (2018)		203	183	173
Hitman 3 (2021)		176	170	162
Outriders (2021)		118	117	117
Resident Evil Village (2021)		178	176	156
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021)				105
Days Gone (2021)		154	140	106
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021)		144	143
Deathloop (2021)		117	106	90.1
New World (2021)		96.8	92.7	86.8
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)		82.7	79.2
Far Cry 6 (2021)		103	91	87
Back 4 Blood (2021)		220	205	193
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)		112	111	110
Riders Republic (2021)		136	114	105

Emissões

Emissões sonoras

Uma das fraquezas cruciais de Clevo barebones sempre foi o controle deficiente do ventilador. Embora o Apex 17 permaneça relativamente silencioso com 25 a 31 dB(A) em modo ocioso, os ventiladores aparecem até 57 a 59 dB(A) sob carga quando se usa o modo de desempenho - um nível de ruído irritantemente alto que acaba forçando o uso de um fone de ouvido. Se você quiser que seja mais silencioso, você deve mudar para o modo Entretenimento ou Silencioso quando estiver jogando e especialmente durante tarefas menos exigentes como jogar vídeos

Barulho

Ocioso		25 / 28 / 31 dB
Carga		57 / 59 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-3%	11%	1%	0%	6%
off / environment *	25	24 4%	24.2 3%	24 4%	26 -4%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Minimum *	25	29 -16%	24.7 1%	25 -0%	26 -4%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average *	28	32 -14%	24.7 12%	32 -14%	33.1 -18%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Maximum *	31	38 -23%	24.7 20%	34 -10%	31.3 -1%	30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average *	57	49 14%	44.3 22%	54 5%	49.8 13%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years) 24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57	53 7%	56.3 1%	51 11%
Load Maximum *	59	55 7%	47.7 19%	54 8%	49.6 16%	53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O desenvolvimento da temperatura do Apex 17 está de acordo com a concorrência, apesar do nível de ruído mais elevado. Após uma hora de carga completa com as ferramentas FurMark e Prime95, poderíamos coaxar até 45 °C(113°F) do chassi na parte superior e até 49 °C (120,2°F) na parte inferior. O processador em particular aquece dentro da caixa. Enquanto o RTX 3070 atingiu cerca de 83 °C(181,4°F) durante o teste de esforço, o Ryzen 7 5800H quase rachou a marca de 100 °C(212°F) de acordo com a ferramenta HWMonitor

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	45 °C
41 °C	43 °C	43 °C
32 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C


49 °C	45 °C	43 °C
40 °C	43 °C	40 °C
38 °C	39 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 62 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25 °C
27 °C	27 °C	24 °C

Máximo: 27 °C
Médio: 25.9 °C


27 °C	27 °C	26 °C
27 °C	30 °C	30 °C
26 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38 °C	40 °C	41 °C
38 °C	41 °C	40 °C
33 °C	36 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C


46 °C	42 °C	39 °C
37 °C	38 °C	39 °C
36 °C	38 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-13%	-10%	-3%	-9%	-7%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	47 -4%	41 9%	43 4%	44 2%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years) -2%
Maximum Bottom *	49	51 -4%	47.2 4%	47 4%	52.7 -8%	49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Upper Side *	27	32 -19%	33.2 -23%	30 -11%	32.6 -21%	31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years) -16%
Idle Bottom *	30	37 -23%	39 -30%	33 -10%	32.1 -7%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Orador

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

Graças à comutação gráfica (Nvidia Optimus), o Apex 17 não consome muita energia durante tarefas pouco exigentes. O consumo ocioso de 10 a 20 watts é menor do que a concorrência. As diferenças são limitadas sob carga

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 2.2 Watt
Ocioso	10 / 14 / 20 Watt
Carga	112 / 231 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-15%	-50%	-8%	-21%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	10	13 -30%	20.9 -109%	12 -20%	18.7 -87%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Average *	14	16 -14%	25.1 -79%	16 -14%	22 -57%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -37%
Idle Maximum *	20	26 -30%	45 -125%	28 -40%	25.2 -26%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -35%
Load Average *	112	125 -12%	102 9%	92 18%	134.7 -20%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	202	187 7%	189 6%	198 2%	135 33%
Load Maximum *	231	259 -12%	234.8 -2%	210 9%	157 32%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption Witcher 3

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21: Ø202 (197-222)

Duração da bateria

A capacidade da bateria é modesta. 49 Que não estão mais atualizados em 2021, especialmente tendo em vista o preço. Para comparação: A concorrência oferece 62 a 70 Wh. Felizmente, o tempo de funcionamento não cai completamente devido ao consumo moderado de energia. O Apex 17 durou cerca de 5 horas em nosso teste Wi-Fi com brilho médio - uma taxa decente.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 02min

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-30%	15%	-18%	32%	30%
Reader / Idle	422	281 -33%	404 -4%	337 -20%	608 44%	542 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years) 28%
WiFi v1.3	294	208 -29%	314 7%	252 -14%	334 14%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=182, last 2 years) 25%
Load	62	44 -29%	88 42%	49 -21%	86 39%	84.1 ?(36 - 173, n=144, last 2 years) 36%
H.264					420	397 ?(56 - 747, n=93, last 2 years)

Pro

+ fornecimento estável de energia da CPU & GPU

+ muitas opções de manutenção

+ dispositivos de entrada relativamente bons

+ configuração individual

Contra

- um pouco de desenvolvimento de ruído no modo de desempenho

- A exibição poderia ser melhor (brilho, contraste)

- O estojo não parece de muito boa qualidade

- baixa capacidade da bateria

Veredicto

XMG Apex 17: Dispositivo de teste fornecido pela Schenker Technologies (bestware.com)

Se você está procurando um caderno de jogos com boas opções de manutenção, o Apex 17 é a escolha certa.

Uma bateria de acesso externo e removível é raramente encontrada hoje em dia (embora a capacidade da bateria deixe muito a desejar).

Além do desenvolvimento extremamente alto de ruído no modo de desempenho - há diferentes perfis de desempenho - o equipamento de 17 polegadas parece, de outra forma, pouco espetacular. A caixa, os dispositivos de entrada e as interfaces cortam uma figura sólida. Por outro lado, é um pouco lamentável que o fabricante não tenha instalado uma tela melhor. A luminosidade e o contraste só satisfazem as altas exigências de forma limitada.

Em troca, o Apex 17 pontua na categoria de desempenho. O processador e a placa gráfica fornecem taxas de referência acima da média (não menos importante graças ao generoso TDP).

Os fãs da economia que gostariam de ter um RTX 3070 deveriam preferir o Acer Nitro 5 AN517O TGP, que custa alguns 100 euros (~$114) a menos com equipamentos similares (mas também tem um TGP mais baixo).

Preço e disponibilidade

O XMG Apex 17 está disponível na loja do fabricante bestware.com a partir de 1.479 euros (~$1.692)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 - 2021-11-02 11/02/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

77 / 98 → 79%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

58 / 80 → 72%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria

63 / 95 → 66%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

99%

Desempenho da aplicação

96%

Temperatura

86 / 95 → 90%

Ruído

60 / 90 → 67%

Audio

74%

Camera

39 / 85 → 45%

Médio

73%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) revisão de laptop: Para jogadores resistentes ao ruído

Florian Glaser, 2021-11-14 (Update: 2021-11-14)

XMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ) revisão de laptop: Para jogadores resistentes ao ruído

Possible competitors in comparison

Size comparison

Comunicação

Webcam

Mostrar

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Condições de teste

Energia

Processador

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance Test

Desempenho do sistema

Latências DPC

Armazenamento em massa

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa gráfica

Desempenho do jogo

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram

Emissões

Emissões sonoras

Temperatura

Orador

SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

Energy consumption Witcher 3

Duração da bateria

Pro

Contra

Veredicto

Preço e disponibilidade

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare