Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo NH57AF1): Extremamente rápido, extremamente barulhento

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/12/2020

Desempenho a todo custo. O XMG Apex 15 da Schenker Technologies é um portátil de gama alta muito incomum. Com que frequência você encontra processadores AMD conectados através de um soquete nos portáteis? Descubra quais os pontos fortes e fracos que este dispositivo exótico tem reservado, em nossa análise.

Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Processador
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1260 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
AMD B450
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC293 @ AMD K17.7 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1x conector para fones, 1x conector de áudio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 32.5 x 361 x 258
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 Watts, mouse pad, DVD com controladores, pasta condutora de calor, memória USB com software, Guia de início rápido, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.668 kg, Suprimento de energia: 698 g
Preço
2024 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
05/2020
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.7 kg32.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
87 %
03/2019
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
3.5 kg38 mm15.6"1920x1080
86 %
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.5 kg29.9 mm15.6"3840x2160
85 %
12/2019
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg26.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
86 %
06/2019
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080

Size Comparison

386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 32.5 mm 2.7 kg359 mm 258 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 26.9 mm 2.3 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
688 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1620, n=307)
657 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1400 MBit/s ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
720 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
675 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=307)
612 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
ColorChecker
29.7 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
23 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1: 25.46 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 43.55 ∆E
No screenshots found ()
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
314
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 346 cd/m² Médio: 315.7 cd/m² Minimum: 41 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 1132:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.52 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 2.49
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-7%
82%
13%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-0%
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
86%
13.2 (7.2, 6)
25%
17.2 (9.2, 8)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
2.6 (1.3, 1.3)
77%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-0%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-0%
PWM Frequency
59.52 (100)
23150 (19)
24040 (29)
Screen
-5%
-16%
8%
12%
Brightness middle
317
263
-17%
414.9
31%
277.4
-12%
266
-16%
Brightness
316
264
-16%
404
28%
264
-16%
252
-20%
Brightness Distribution
84
89
6%
88
5%
90
7%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.28
0.17
39%
0.24
14%
0.27
4%
Contrast
1132
1547
37%
1156
2%
985
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.52
4.45
-26%
7.58
-115%
1.51
57%
1.81
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.93
8.33
-20%
14.85
-114%
4.93
29%
3.23
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.49
1.93
22%
1.77
29%
1.03
59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.81
4.77
-70%
2.9
-3%
3.7
-32%
2.44
13%
Gamma
2.54 87%
2.52 87%
2.05 107%
2.23 99%
2.42 91%
CCT
6877 95%
7767 84%
6538 99%
7061 92%
7005 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67
60
-10%
88.2
32%
65.1
-3%
62
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
93
2%
100
10%
99.1
9%
97
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-6% / -5%
33% / 4%
11% / 8%
7% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18192 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270228022902300231023202330234023502360237023802390240024102420243024402450246024702480249025002510252025302540255025602570258025902600261026202630264026502660267026802690270027102720273027402750276027702780279028002810Tooltip
: Ø2685 (2664.54-2804.07)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100% +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
197 Points ∼97%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
183 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=563)
159 Points ∼78% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
2804 (min: 2664.54, max: 2804.07) Points ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points ∼65% -35%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1601 Points ∼57% -43%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼52% -48%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
1401 Points ∼50% -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=567)
870 Points ∼31% -69%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
527 Seconds * ∼100% -194%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=38)
441 Seconds * ∼84% -146%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
179 Seconds * ∼34%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
75612 MIPS ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
43805 MIPS ∼58% -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=38)
33569 MIPS ∼44% -56%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5367 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
5134 MIPS ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=38)
4732 MIPS ∼88% -8%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
490 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=83)
437 Points ∼89% -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
6321 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points ∼60% -40%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points ∼55% -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=84)
2755 Points ∼44% -56%
Geekbench 5.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
10190 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=20)
6256 Points ∼61% -39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
1246 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1347, n=20)
1163 Points ∼93% -7%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
18.9 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
12.348 fps ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=39)
9.19 fps ∼49% -51%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (52.1 - 86.6, n=14)
62.6 s ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
59.4 s ∼95%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=20)
0.635 sec * ∼100% -16%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
0.546 sec * ∼86%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5700
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
44191
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
30.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.22 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2804 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
186 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
197 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6883 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6452 Points ∼94% -6%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
6283 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5826 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=257)
5291 Points ∼77% -23%
LatencyMon - Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
913.6 μs ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-26%
-14%
-21%
-28%
Write 4K
208.4
129.9
-38%
153
-27%
125.7
-40%
135
-35%
Read 4K
52.46
47.15
-10%
60.54
15%
45.04
-14%
54.91
5%
Write Seq
3241
1840
-43%
1938
-40%
2361
-27%
1649
-49%
Read Seq
3037
1775
-42%
1932
-36%
1987
-35%
1449
-52%
Write 4K Q32T1
497.1
294.5
-41%
482.5
-3%
407.1
-18%
507.6
2%
Read 4K Q32T1
530.4
373.6
-30%
593.9
12%
536.9
1%
558.9
5%
Write Seq Q32T1
3318
3295
-1%
2324
-30%
2398
-28%
1759
-47%
Read Seq Q32T1
3567
3535
-1%
3539
-1%
3309
-7%
1826
-49%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3567 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3318 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 530.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 497.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3037 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3241 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 208.4 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard
41167 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
23447 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
50713 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18460 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8253 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø75.4 (71-81)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4627 Points ∼100%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4346 Points ∼94% -6%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4265 Points ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4155 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6005, n=85)
4074 Points ∼88% -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
8028 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7931 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7815 Points ∼97% -1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7754 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7006 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=202)
5881 Points ∼73% -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20997 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20759 Points ∼99% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20466 Points ∼97%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20434 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
18169 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=589)
11830 Points ∼56% -42%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
27265 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26975 Points ∼99% -1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26582 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25845 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
23335 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=666)
14092 Points ∼52% -48%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
80.6 fps ∼100% +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
78.4 fps ∼97% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900
74.5 (min: 62) fps ∼92%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
73 (min: 60) fps ∼91% -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
67 (min: 55) fps ∼83% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼64% -31%
baixo média alto ultra
GTA V (2015) 179 172 160 87 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 74.5 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152 136 131 124 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 112 102 82.9 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 107 97 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 136 124 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 81.4 63.3 fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 120 104 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 101 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 161 157 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 119 85.8 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.332.535.833.634.82537.335.342.142.841.73131.332.232.133.936.74033.93533.733.134.95032.833.53029.443.16335.238.429.627.2408045.934.228.926.23210043.347.32723.933.712538.441.626.123.834.41603840.327.726.929.920039.842.226.521.528.22504241.926.921.827.731542.344.329.220.727.340044.347.526.619.927.450047.550.126.918.529.163046.950.426.51829.780045.548.826.517.728.7100046.949.92617.429125047.550.625.818.328.5160049.552.826.318.129.8200049.953.425.517.528.9250049.65322.617.928.4315048.251.820.917.722.8400046.950.61917.720.3500046.950.118.417.719.663004448.418.117.619.1800039.545.518.117.518.2100003944.418.517.618.41250036.742.91817.517.81600031.938.91817.617.8SPL59.362.736.130.238.9N13.716.92.41.43.1median 44.3median 48.4median 26median 17.9median 28.2Delta3.53.62.91.43.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 39 dB
Carga
59 / 63 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
15%
13%
7%
14%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.2
6%
28.8
4%
29
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=358)
2%
Idle Minimum *
35
32
9%
28.2
19%
33
6%
30
14%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=780)
10%
Idle Average *
36
33
8%
28.2
22%
33
8%
37
-3%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=780)
9%
Idle Maximum *
39
36
8%
31.7
19%
33.1
15%
39
-0%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=781)
11%
Load Average *
59
55
7%
53.7
9%
38
36%
54
8%
40.9 (30.1 - 59, n=781)
31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
62
57
8%
53.7
13%
52.9
15%
54
13%
Load Maximum *
63
59
6%
53.7
15%
57.8
8%
54
14%
48.3 (38.9 - 64.1, n=781)
23%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C43 °C44 °C 
 37 °C41 °C38 °C 
 33 °C34 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
46 °C48 °C47 °C
44 °C45 °C40 °C
28 °C28 °C29 °C
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 42.4 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
-1%
-1%
2%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
45
-2%
40.2
9%
45
-2%
51
-16%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=746)
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
48
48
-0%
53
-10%
53
-10%
49
-2%
49.7 (25.9 - 78, n=744)
-4%
Idle Upper Side *
33
30
9%
34.2
-4%
31.2
5%
30
9%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=698)
7%
Idle Bottom *
41
30
27%
39.6
3%
39
5%
35
15%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=696)
22%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.636.12542.838.83133.933.24033.136.55029.433.36327.230.38026.230.710023.928.212523.83116026.939.220021.541.925021.850.331520.759.840019.965.850018.565.26301867.580017.777.5100017.475.8125018.369.9160018.169.5200017.567.7250017.963.6315017.762.5400017.765.3500017.766630017.657.2800017.557.11000017.652.41250017.551.91600017.657.7SPL30.281.4N1.446.4median 17.9median 62.5Delta1.47.843.544.238.639.731.232.235.237.428.428.826.329.125.830.326.736.524.237.422.750.525.658.326.361.721.763.72061.518.859.91858.918.261.817.96419.164.718.162.917.265.517.767.417.767.617.565.517.76517.665.817.563.817.56117.35817.349.330.576.81.440.8median 18median 61.82.44hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.7 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 55 / 59 / 63 Watt
Carga midlight 141 / 259 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
19%
37%
42%
28%
47%
Idle Minimum *
55
35
36%
12.6
77%
15
73%
29
47%
19.3 (1.9 - 113, n=743)
65%
Idle Average *
59
39
34%
21.4
64%
18.5
69%
32
46%
24.7 (6.6 - 119, n=743)
58%
Idle Maximum *
63
47
25%
34.4
45%
20.2
68%
37
41%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=743)
52%
Load Average *
141
117
17%
123.2
13%
110.9
21%
157
-11%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=733)
26%
Load Maximum *
259
299
-15%
246.6
5%
260
-0%
217
16%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=732)
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
238
196
18%
192.4
19%
187.3
21%
173
27%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
1h 13min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
1h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 30min
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
165%
232%
224%
235%
289%
Reader / Idle
73
194
166%
371
408%
328
349%
351 (39 - 1174, n=697)
381%
WiFi v1.3
62
157
153%
206
232%
216
248%
177
185%
261 (62 - 622, n=407)
321%
Load
30
83
177%
35
17%
81
170%
79.2 (18 - 202, n=664)
164%
H.264
154
256 (88 - 508, n=151)

Pro

+ Excelente desempenho do sistema
+ Configurações individuais
+ Até três dispositivos de armazenamento
+ O processador pode ser substituído
+ Manutenção confortável
+ Sem bloatware
+ Painel de 144-Hz

Contra

- Excelente desempenho do sistema
- Configurações individuais
- Até três dispositivos de armazenamento
- O processador pode ser substituído
- Manutenção confortável
- Sem bloatware
- Painel de 144-Hz
In review: Schenker XMG Apex 15. Test unit provided by bestware.com
In review: Schenker XMG Apex 15. Test unit provided by bestware.com

12 núcleos e 24 threads em um portátil: O que parece maravilhoso tem algumas armadilhas no uso diário.

Os escassos mecanismos de economia de energia da CPU AMD significam que o Ryzen 9 3900 é muito barulhento (3000 - 4000 rpm) e quente (60 - 70 °C), ocioso e executando tarefas simples, como assistir a vídeos ou navegar na web. Felizmente, você pode alternar para o modo silencioso.

É por isso que dificilmente podemos recomendar o Apex 15 - embora a Schenker esteja planejando uma atualização do BIOS. Um melhor gerenciamento de energia e controle dos ventiladores de refrigeração (modo de entretenimento e desempenho) tornaria esse novato sofisticado um dispositivo interessante para os fãs da AMD. Não conhecemos nenhum portátil de 15 polegadas que ofereça tanto poder de CPU quanto este. A maioria dos modelos Intel é muito mais lenta. 

Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 - 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
19 / 95 → 20%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
40 / 90 → 45%
Audio
70%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Médio
69%
81%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo NH57AF1): Extremamente rápido, extremamente barulhento
Florian Glaser, 2020-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-18)