Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo NH57AF1): Extremamente rápido, extremamente barulhento

Name: SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Brand: SCHENKER

Desempenho a todo custo. O XMG Apex 15 da Schenker Technologies é um portátil de gama alta muito incomum. Com que frequência você encontra processadores AMD conectados através de um soquete nos portáteis? Descubra quais os pontos fortes e fracos que este dispositivo exótico tem reservado, em nossa análise.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/12/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 (XMG Apex Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12 x 3.1 - 4.3 GHz, Matisse (Zen 2)

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1260 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz

placa mãe

AMD B450

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, NVMe. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC293 @ AMD K17.7 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1x conector para fones, 1x conector de áudio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 32.5 x 361 x 258

Bateria

62 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 Watts, mouse pad, DVD com controladores, pasta condutora de calor, memória USB com software, Guia de início rápido, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.668 kg, Suprimento de energia: 698 g

Preço

2024 EUR

Links

SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.2 %	05/2020	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.7 kg	32.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87 %	03/2019	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	3.5 kg	38 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.9 %		Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.5 kg	29.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
84.7 %	12/2019	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86 %	06/2019	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Asus Strix Scar III G531GW MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, microSD

Right: headphones, microphone, USB-A 2.0

Back: USB-C 3.1 Gen2 incl. DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, power supply

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1400 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=2, last 2 years)	1149 MBit/s -18%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	720 MBit/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	675 MBit/s -52%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	654 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1330 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=2, last 2 years)	1291 MBit/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	693 MBit/s -48%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	688 MBit/s -48%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s -49%

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1: 25.46 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 43.55 ∆E


314 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
299 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	315 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	346 cd/m²	335 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 315.7 cd/m² Minimum: 41 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 1132:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.49
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-0%	35%	6%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	67.3	66.1 -2%	99.9 48%	69.3 3%	66.2 -2%
sRGB Coverage	91.3	92.6 1%	100 10%	98.9 8%	96.5 6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.8	67.1 0%	99.1 48%	70.7 6%	67.5 1%
Response Times		-7%	82%	13%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) -0%	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) 86%	13.2 ?(7.2, 6) 25%	17.2 ?(9.2, 8) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6, 5.2)	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -14%	2.6 ?(1.3, 1.3) 77%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -0%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -0%
PWM Frequency			59.5 ?(100)	23150 ?(19)	24040 ?(29)
Screen		-5%	-16%	8%	12%
Brightness middle	317	263 -17%	414.9 31%	277.4 -12%	266 -16%
Brightness	316	264 -16%	404 28%	264 -16%	252 -20%
Brightness Distribution	84	89 6%	88 5%	90 7%	88 5%
Black Level *	0.28	0.17 39%		0.24 14%	0.27 4%
Contrast	1132	1547 37%		1156 2%	985 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.52	4.45 -26%	7.58 -115%	1.51 57%	1.81 49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.93	8.33 -20%	14.85 -114%	4.93 29%	3.23 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.49	1.93 22%		1.77 29%	1.03 59%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.81	4.77 -70%	2.9 -3%	3.7 -32%	2.44 13%
Gamma	2.54 ^87%	2.52 ^87%	2.05 ^107%	2.23 ^99%	2.42 ^91%
CCT	6877 ^95%	7767 ^84%	6538 ^99%	7061 ^92%	7005 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	67	60 -10%	88.2 32%	65.1 -3%	62 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	93 2%	100 10%	99.1 9%	97 7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -4%	34% / 11%	9% / 8%	5% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1: Ø2685 (2664.54-2804.07)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=229, last 2 years)	269 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	203 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	198 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	197 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	183 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=230, last 2 years)	3120 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	2804 (2664.54^min - 2804.07^max) Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points -35%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	1623 Points -42%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	1465 Points -48%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	1401 Points -50%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	527 Seconds * -194%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=223, last 2 years)	198.2 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	179 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=225, last 2 years)	6154 MIPS +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	5367 MIPS +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	5134 MIPS
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=225, last 2 years)	77863 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	75612 MIPS
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	43805 MIPS -42%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=226, last 2 years)	702 Points +43%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	490 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	479 Points -2%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	474 Points -3%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=226, last 2 years)	7507 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	6321 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	3795 Points -40%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	3505 Points -45%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=230, last 2 years)	1817 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	1246 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=230, last 2 years)	13733 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	10190 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=228, last 2 years)	21.4 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	18.9 fps
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	12.35 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	59.4 s *
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=222, last 2 years)	49.3 s * +17%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 AMD Ryzen 9 3900	0.546 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=225, last 2 years)	0.4681 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5700

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

44191

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

30.96 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.22 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2804 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

186 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

197 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=196, last 2 years)	7600 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6868 Points 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6452 Points -6%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	6283 Points -9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5826 Points -15%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	914 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-26%	-14%	-21%	-28%
Write 4K	208.4	129.9 -38%	153 -27%	125.7 -40%	135 -35%
Read 4K	52.5	47.15 -10%	60.5 15%	45.04 -14%	54.9 5%
Write Seq	3241	1840 -43%	1938 -40%	2361 -27%	1649 -49%
Read Seq	3037	1775 -42%	1932 -36%	1987 -35%	1449 -52%
Write 4K Q32T1	497.1	294.5 -41%	482.5 -3%	407.1 -18%	508 2%
Read 4K Q32T1	530	373.6 -30%	594 12%	537 1%	559 5%
Write Seq Q32T1	3318	3295 -1%	2324 -30%	2398 -28%	1759 -47%
Read Seq Q32T1	3567	3535 -1%	3539 -1%	3309 -7%	1826 -49%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3567 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3318 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 530 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 497.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3037 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3241 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 208.4 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		41167 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		23447 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		50713 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18460 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8253 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø75.4 (71-81)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=148, last 2 years)	7745 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	4627 Points
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	4346 Points -6%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	4265 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	4155 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=228, last 2 years)	12090 Points +52%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	8028 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7931 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7815 Points -1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7754 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7006 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=231, last 2 years)	29572 Points +44%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20997 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20759 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20466 Points
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	20434 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	18169 Points -11%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=226, last 2 years)	40653 Points +49%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	27265 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	26975 Points -1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	26582 Points -3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	25845 Points -5%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	23335 Points -14%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=223, last 2 years)	117.5 fps +58%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	80.6 fps +8%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	78.4 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, R9 3900	74.5 (62^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K	73 (60^min) fps -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H	67 (55^min) fps -10%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	179	172	160	87
The Witcher 3 (2015)			142	74.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	152	136	131	124
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	112	102	82.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			107	97
Battlefield V (2018)			136	124
Borderlands 3 (2019)			81.4	63.3
Escape from Tarkov (2020)			120	104
Hunt Showdown (2020)			101
Doom Eternal (2020)			161	157
Gears Tactics (2020)			119	85.8

Barulho

Ocioso		35 / 36 / 39 dB
Carga		59 / 63 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		7%	15%	13%	7%	22%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	28.2 6%	28.8 4%	29 3%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	35	32 9%	28.2 19%	33 6%	30 14%	25.7 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=183, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Average *	36	33 8%	28.2 22%	33 8%	37 -3%	27.5 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=183, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	39	36 8%	31.7 19%	33.1 15%	39 -0%	30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=183, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	59	55 7%	53.7 9%	38 36%	54 8%	43.2 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=183, last 2 years) 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	62	57 8%	53.7 13%	52.9 15%	54 13%
Load Maximum *	63	59 6%	53.7 15%	57.8 8%	54 14%	53.5 ?(43 - 68.2, n=183, last 2 years) 15%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	44 °C
37 °C	41 °C	38 °C
33 °C	34 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C


46 °C	48 °C	47 °C
44 °C	45 °C	40 °C
28 °C	28 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


33 °C	32 °C	32 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
31 °C	31 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C


39 °C	41 °C	40 °C
37 °C	40 °C	34 °C
27 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39 °C	43 °C	44 °C
36 °C	39 °C	36 °C
33 °C	33 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C


47 °C	46 °C	46 °C
45 °C	45 °C	39 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		9%	-1%	-1%	2%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	44	45 -2%	40.2 9%	45 -2%	51 -16%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years) -5%
Maximum Bottom *	48	48 -0%	53 -10%	53 -10%	49 -2%	49.4 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Upper Side *	33	30 9%	34.2 -4%	31.2 5%	30 9%	31.3 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Bottom *	41	30 27%	39.6 3%	39 5%	35 15%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years) 21%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.7 / 1.3 Watt
Ocioso	55 / 59 / 63 Watt
Carga	141 / 259 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		19%	37%	42%	28%	45%
Idle Minimum *	55	35 36%	12.6 77%	15 73%	29 47%	13.9 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years) 75%
Idle Average *	59	39 34%	21.4 64%	18.5 69%	32 46%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years) 67%
Idle Maximum *	63	47 25%	34.4 45%	20.2 68%	37 41%	26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years) 57%
Load Average *	141	117 17%	123.2 13%	110.9 21%	157 -11%	111.5 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years) 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	238	196 18%	192.4 19%	187.3 21%	173 27%
Load Maximum *	259	299 -15%	246.6 5%	260 -0%	217 16%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		1h 13min
WiFi Websurfing		1h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 30min

	SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 R9 3900, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh	Eurocom Nightsky RX15 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh	MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		165%	232%	224%	235%	440%
Reader / Idle	73	194 166%		371 408%	328 349%	543 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 644%
WiFi v1.3	62	157 153%	206 232%	216 248%	177 185%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years) 494%
Load	30	83 177%		35 17%	81 170%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years) 181%
H.264		154				397 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Excelente desempenho do sistema

+ Configurações individuais

+ Até três dispositivos de armazenamento

+ O processador pode ser substituído

+ Manutenção confortável

+ Sem bloatware

+ Painel de 144-Hz

Contra

- Excelente desempenho do sistema

- Configurações individuais

- Até três dispositivos de armazenamento

- O processador pode ser substituído

- Manutenção confortável

- Sem bloatware

- Painel de 144-Hz

In review: Schenker XMG Apex 15. Test unit provided by bestware.com

12 núcleos e 24 threads em um portátil: O que parece maravilhoso tem algumas armadilhas no uso diário.

Os escassos mecanismos de economia de energia da CPU AMD significam que o Ryzen 9 3900 é muito barulhento (3000 - 4000 rpm) e quente (60 - 70 °C), ocioso e executando tarefas simples, como assistir a vídeos ou navegar na web. Felizmente, você pode alternar para o modo silencioso.

É por isso que dificilmente podemos recomendar o Apex 15 - embora a Schenker esteja planejando uma atualização do BIOS. Um melhor gerenciamento de energia e controle dos ventiladores de refrigeração (modo de entretenimento e desempenho) tornaria esse novato sofisticado um dispositivo interessante para os fãs da AMD. Não conhecemos nenhum portátil de 15 polegadas que ofereça tanto poder de CPU quanto este. A maioria dos modelos Intel é muito mais lenta.

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 - 2020-05-06 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

75 / 98 → 77%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

67 / 80 → 84%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 87%

Bateria

19 / 95 → 20%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

94%

Desempenho da aplicação

95%

Temperatura

85 / 95 → 89%

Ruído

40 / 90 → 45%

Audio

70%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

69%

81%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 311 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo NH57AF1): Extremamente rápido, extremamente barulhento

Florian Glaser, 2020-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-18)

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo NH57AF1): Extremamente rápido, extremamente barulhento

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1 audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare