snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A10: Poder em plástico

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/21/2019

Jogos em 60 FPS a um preço acessível. Sem surpresa, a Samsung fez alguns compromissos para o modelo mais barato em sua série Galaxy A. No entanto, o Galaxy A10 não é desleixado e funciona bem para um smartphone de menos de US$ 200. Leia mais para descobrir em quais áreas a Samsung fez bem e onde o Galaxy A10 fica aquém dos seus mais preciosos irmãos da série Galaxy A.

Samsung Galaxy A10 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7884B
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
6.2 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 271 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, micro USB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 155.6 x 75.6
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/1.9, 28 mm, Contrast AF, LED flash, videos a 1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na traseira do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.09 W/kg, Head - 0.321 W/kg. LTE: 150 Mbps downloads, 50 Mbps uploads. FM radio, fanless
peso
168 g, Suprimento de energia: 44 g
Preço
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Galaxy A10

Size Comparison

159.4 mm 76.2 mm 8.6 mm 181 g158.7 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 180 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.6 mm 75.6 mm 7.9 mm 168 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼100% +325%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼30% +29%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
66 (min: 58, max: 65) MBit/s ∼29% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼26% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 39, max: 60) MBit/s ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 (min: 49, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% -4%
Nokia 3.2
Adreno 504, 429, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.7 (min: 32, max: 51) MBit/s ∼20% -17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼100% +329%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 52, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +9%
Nokia 3.2
Adreno 504, 429, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.1 (min: 46, max: 55) MBit/s ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼18% -22%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼17% -25%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36.9 (min: 22, max: 52) MBit/s ∼17% -27%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Corners
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Corners
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 – Bridge
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 – Bridge
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 - Corners
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A10 - Corners

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
407
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 451 cd/m² Médio: 430.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 2050:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.206
Samsung Galaxy A10
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Honor 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.09
Xiaomi Redmi 7
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Nokia 3.2
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
-16%
-7%
-6%
2%
-22%
Brightness middle
451
475
5%
522
16%
444
-2%
487
8%
415
-8%
Brightness
430
473
10%
542
26%
441
3%
485
13%
391
-9%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
94
4%
90
0%
89
-1%
86
-4%
Black Level *
0.22
0.35
-59%
0.47
-114%
0.45
-105%
0.35
-59%
0.55
-150%
Contrast
2050
1357
-34%
1111
-46%
987
-52%
1391
-32%
755
-63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
6.8
-25%
4
26%
3.94
28%
4.3
21%
4.8
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.94
13.4
-12%
9.5
20%
6.72
44%
10.1
15%
9.51
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.8
8.7
-12%
6.6
15%
4.8
38%
4.1
47%
5.7
27%
Gamma
2.206 100%
2.33 94%
2.28 96%
2.294 96%
2.09 105%
2.255 98%
CCT
9149 71%
9385 69%
7258 90%
7445 87%
7312 89%
7824 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 77 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 77 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 77 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
2832 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼70% +16%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2893 Points ∼62% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3850 Points ∼82% +36%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1607 Points ∼34% -43%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1904 Points ∼41% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2832 - 3569, n=3)
3224 Points ∼69% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼100% +66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3590 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼79% +3%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3834 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4301 Points ∼91% +20%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2354 Points ∼50% -34%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
2485 Points ∼53% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3590 - 4082, n=3)
3795 Points ∼80% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼100% +32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1168 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼85% +4%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
855 Points ∼60% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1227 Points ∼86% +5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
832 Points ∼58% -29%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
860 Points ∼60% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1168 - 1216, n=3)
1199 Points ∼84% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼100% +22%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
5136 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼90% +3%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4886 Points ∼83% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
5912 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼93% +7%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
4631 Points ∼78% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (5136 - 5309, n=3)
5250 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=388)
5333 Points ∼90% +4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6823 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼97% +1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4045 Points ∼57% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7117 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼59% -38%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
6227 Points ∼87% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6316 - 6902, n=3)
6680 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=556)
5785 Points ∼81% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
2051 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼13% -2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2079 Points ∼13% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +667%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1740 Points ∼11% -15%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1849 Points ∼12% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2018 - 2105, n=3)
2058 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=68)
2676 Points ∼17% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
480 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼3% +4%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼2% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼100% +2928%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
203 Points ∼1% -58%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
209 Points ∼1% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (477 - 498, n=3)
485 Points ∼3% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=68)
2721 Points ∼19% +467%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
578 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼4% +3%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
435 Points ∼3% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼100% +2458%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼2% -56%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
260 Points ∼2% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (576 - 598, n=3)
584 Points ∼4% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=68)
2478 Points ∼17% +329%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1615 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼76% +1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼48% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2133 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
876 Points ∼41% -46%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1233 Points ∼58% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1554 - 1628, n=3)
1599 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=396)
1981 Points ∼93% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
439 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼25% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
432 Points ∼24% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
469 Points ∼26% +7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼11% -55%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
210 Points ∼12% -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (439 - 498, n=3)
459 Points ∼26% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=396)
1787 Points ∼100% +307%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
524 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼32% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
496 Points ∼30% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
567 Points ∼34% +8%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
238 Points ∼14% -55%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
257 Points ∼16% -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (524 - 588, n=3)
546 Points ∼33% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=397)
1658 Points ∼100% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1629 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼76% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
961 Points ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2147 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼41% -45%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1195 Points ∼56% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1624 - 1768, n=3)
1674 Points ∼78% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=424)
1893 Points ∼88% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
646 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼28% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼29% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼34% +26%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼19% -30%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
393 Points ∼16% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (646 - 826, n=3)
710 Points ∼30% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=424)
2386 Points ∼100% +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
746 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼38% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
741 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
943 Points ∼47% +26%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼25% -32%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
462 Points ∼23% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (746 - 937, n=3)
814 Points ∼41% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=424)
2004 Points ∼100% +169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1682 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼77% -3%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
998 Points ∼47% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2119 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
898 Points ∼42% -47%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1207 Points ∼57% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1630 - 1747, n=3)
1686 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=476)
1888 Points ∼89% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
444 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼30% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
223 Points ∼15% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
424 Points ∼29% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼17% -44%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
152 Points ∼10% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (443 - 555, n=3)
481 Points ∼33% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=476)
1478 Points ∼100% +233%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
531 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼37% -1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
270 Points ∼19% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
516 Points ∼36% -3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
298 Points ∼21% -44%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
189 Points ∼13% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (526 - 654, n=3)
570 Points ∼40% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=477)
1423 Points ∼100% +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1674 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼77% -2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
997 Points ∼47% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2132 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼41% -48%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1235 Points ∼58% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1646 - 1756, n=3)
1692 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=516)
1754 Points ∼82% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
582 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼33% +9%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
429 Points ∼22% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
807 Points ∼42% +39%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼18% -39%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
399 Points ∼21% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (582 - 766, n=3)
662 Points ∼34% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=515)
1936 Points ∼100% +233%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
681 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼44% +8%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
491 Points ∼29% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
936 Points ∼56% +37%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼25% -40%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
470 Points ∼28% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (681 - 876, n=3)
765 Points ∼46% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=518)
1674 Points ∼100% +146%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11287 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼73% +7%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10689 Points ∼65% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼95% +39%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼85% +24%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
16518 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11287 - 13610, n=3)
12324 Points ∼75% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=676)
14217 Points ∼86% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11335 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼52% +1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7061 Points ∼32% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼66% +28%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼34% -33%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
6895 Points ∼31% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11335 - 13711, n=3)
12158 Points ∼55% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=674)
22183 Points ∼100% +96%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11324 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼65% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7637 Points ∼43% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼82% +31%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼47% -26%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
7920 Points ∼44% -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11324 - 13688, n=3)
12192 Points ∼68% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=674)
17924 Points ∼100% +58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼52% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼50% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
25 fps ∼66% +25%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼37% -30%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
11 fps ∼29% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 25, n=3)
21.7 fps ∼57% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼100% +91%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
31 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼84% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼70% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
37 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼54% -35%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
17 fps ∼46% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (31 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼93% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼76% -9%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
10 fps ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼50% +10%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.8 fps ∼45% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
11 fps ∼50% +10%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼30% -35%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
4.7 fps ∼21% -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (10 - 13, n=3)
11.3 fps ∼52% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼100% +119%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼72% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
19 fps ∼85% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼49% -45%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
8.9 fps ∼40% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 27, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼87% -3%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6.5 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼36% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.8 fps ∼32% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼39% +8%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼23% -35%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
3.1 fps ∼17% -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)
7.03 fps ∼39% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼100% +175%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
14 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼84% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼57% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14 fps ∼84% 0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼46% -46%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
6.7 fps ∼40% -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (14 - 19, n=3)
15.7 fps ∼94% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼100% +19%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.8 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼48% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4.2 fps ∼42% -12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼27% -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)
5.33 fps ∼53% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=189)
9.99 fps ∼100% +108%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1.4 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1.3 fps ∼19% -7%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼11% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)
1.533 fps ∼22% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=188)
6.98 fps ∼100% +399%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
7.9 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼53% -1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼46% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼48% -11%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼16% -71%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
2 fps ∼14% -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (7.8 - 10, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼58% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=193)
14.7 fps ∼100% +86%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼24% 0%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼23% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼24% -2%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼26% +5%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1.8 fps ∼11% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4 - 5, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼26% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=193)
16.4 fps ∼100% +310%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.1 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼34% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.6 fps ∼21% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼32% -5%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼16% -51%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1.8 fps ∼15% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)
4.2 fps ∼34% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼100% +198%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
8.7 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼79% -1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼35% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7.8 fps ∼72% -10%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼28% -64%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
3.6 fps ∼33% -59%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (8.6 - 12, n=3)
9.77 fps ∼90% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼100% +25%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
89089 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
95464 Points ∼67% +7%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
102781 Points ∼72% +15%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼45% -28%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
63459 Points ∼44% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (89089 - 102121, n=3)
95558 Points ∼67% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼100% +61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1113 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼99% -1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
816 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1071 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
790 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (977 - 1113, n=3)
1065 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=635)
760 Points ∼68% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
879 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼43% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
792 Points ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1072 Points ∼52% +22%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼23% -47%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
481 Points ∼23% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (879 - 1113, n=3)
962 Points ∼46% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼100% +135%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1991 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼100% +1%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1366 Points ∼68% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1758 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼73% -27%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
1285 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1985 - 2008, n=3)
1995 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼76% -23%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3164 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼82% +7%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2533 Points ∼62% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4090 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼43% -45%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
2020 Points ∼49% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3164 - 3507, n=3)
3348 Points ∼82% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼73% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1576 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼95% +2%
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1223 Points ∼72% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1695 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼58% -37%
Nokia 3.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048
997 Points ∼59% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1576 - 1658, n=3)
1614 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼89% -5%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=107)
35.7 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
26.9 Points ∼75% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
23.4 Points ∼66%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)
22.4 Points ∼63% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼60% -8%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼43% -35%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)
14.566 Points ∼41% -38%
Honor 8A
13.6 Points ∼38% -42%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=95)
39.9 runs/min ∼100% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)
27.44 runs/min ∼69% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼54% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)
21.5 runs/min ∼54% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chome 76)
20.7 runs/min ∼52%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼39% -24%
Nokia 3.2 (Chome 75)
15.57 runs/min ∼39% -25%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
14.8 runs/min ∼37% -29%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
58 Points ∼87% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼72% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)
47 Points ∼70% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
45 Points ∼67%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)
36 Points ∼54% -20%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼52% -22%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
29 Points ∼43% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
8258 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼90% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)
7152 Points ∼87% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
6921 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼82% -2%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼54% -36%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)
4392 Points ∼53% -37%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
4347 Points ∼53% -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 8A (Chrome)
11323 ms * ∼100% -91%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=718)
10523 ms * ∼93% -78%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)
10433 ms * ∼92% -76%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼90% -72%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
5917.3 ms * ∼52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)
5763 ms * ∼51% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼49% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
4856.4 ms * ∼43% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A20eHonor 8AXiaomi Redmi 7Huawei Y6 2019Nokia 3.2Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
-2%
-0%
2%
-1%
-12%
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
61.83
-5%
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
65.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
50.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=142)
-23%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=428)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
81.92
4%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
87.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
69.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=142)
-12%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=428)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
13.3
13.18
-1%
15
13%
14.4
8%
15
13%
17.5
32%
18.2 (0.75 - 77.3, n=185)
37%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=752)
68%
Random Read 4KB
73.4
79.76
9%
61
-17%
73.6
0%
69
-6%
35
-52%
39 (3.59 - 117, n=185)
-47%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=752)
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB
101.7
103.57
2%
104
2%
84.7
-17%
107.78
6%
106.3
5%
93.9 (14.8 - 189, n=185)
-8%
97.6 (2.99 - 590, n=752)
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB
296.4
300.36
1%
265
-11%
298
1%
279.26
-6%
282.4
-5%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=185)
-20%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=752)
-7%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.8 (54-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.4 (53-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.4 (17-30)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø29 (25-31)
Carga Máxima
 38.7 °C34.6 °C32.4 °C 
 37.6 °C33.8 °C32.5 °C 
 36.4 °C33.8 °C32.5 °C 
Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
30.3 °C33.4 °C38.7 °C
30.9 °C33.6 °C38.7 °C
30.9 °C33.6 °C37 °C
Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.347.52540.340.13135.640.24040.339.25042.740.56334.333.68027.226.610028.529.912526.332.516024.440.120023.441.625021.446.731520.554.2400206050019.864.963018.771.180018.474.4100023.573.7125017.474.1160017.471200017.570.7250017.569315016.962.1400016.968500016.973.263001779.980001781.11000017.272.11250017.161.21600017.154.3SPL66.430.686.1N20.51.564.6median 17.5median 68Delta2.910.136.742.733.637.834.335.133.830.63933.534.831.43130.530.232.123.228.122.835.322.636.919.844.220.150.316.951.916.856.915.259.415.864.915.869.314.569.31570.914.17015.369.814.971.614.969.614.770.114.769.614.970.814.873.215.361.615.45227.881.6149.8median 15.3median 64.92.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A20e
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 5.4 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Nokia 3.2
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
22%
-4%
-2%
17%
-15%
13%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.66
6%
0.73
-4%
1
-43%
0.59
16%
1
-43%
0.67 (0.65 - 0.7, n=3)
4%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=782)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.63
-2%
2.07
-29%
1.7
-6%
1.94
-21%
1.9
-19%
1.617 (1.6 - 1.63, n=3)
-1%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=781)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.67
16%
2.14
-7%
2.1
-5%
1.96
2%
2.8
-40%
1.777 (1.66 - 2, n=3)
11%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=782)
-2%
Load Average *
5.4
2.77
49%
4.3
20%
3.3
39%
2.82
48%
4
26%
3.73 (2.77 - 5.4, n=3)
31%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=776)
25%
Load Maximum *
6
3.66
39%
5.96
1%
5.6
7%
3.57
40%
5.8
3%
4.67 (3.66 - 6, n=3)
22%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=776)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 36min
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Nokia 3.2
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-6%
11%
6%
-4%
27%
Reader / Idle
1489
1432
-4%
1489
0%
H.264
802
753
-6%
917
14%
902
12%
805
0%
WiFi v1.3
753
715
-5%
828.8
10%
848
13%
732.1
-3%
958
27%
Load
276
250
-9%
301
9%
268
-3%
249
-10%

Pro

+ Desempenho comparativamente alto
+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado
+ Software atual
+ GPS preciso
+ Tela de alto contraste
+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso
+ Alto-falante mono decente

Contra

- Forte oscilação PWM com baixo brilho
- Sem sensor de brilho
- Sem leitor de digitais
- Sem LED de notificações
- Sem bússola
- Qualidade média das chamadas
The Samsung Galaxy A10 smartphone review.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 smartphone review.

A Samsung tomou decisões estranhas no passado quando se trata de quais recursos exclui de seus smartphones baratos. O Galaxy A10 é um exemplo disso, sem um sensor de brilho, bússola, LED de notificação e leito digitais. Outros smartphones de menos de US$ 200 têm pelo menos alguns desses recursos, o que torna o Galaxy A10 um dispositivo ainda mais complicado de se recomendar às pessoas.

Essas omissões são lamentáveis, pois dificultam o que, de outra forma, seria um smartphone decente. A Samsung colocou muita potência pelo dinheiro, com o Galaxy A10 sendo capaz de rodar alguns jogos modernos a 60 FPS. Nossa unidade de teste também gerencia bem suas temperaturas, enquanto sua única câmera traseira também tira fotos decentes. Da mesma forma, ele possui um módulo GPS razoavelmente preciso e uma tela rica em contraste. Além disso, é raro ver um smartphone econômico com o Android 9.0 Pie.

O Galaxy A10 oferece muita potência pelo dinheiro, mas a Samsung comprometeu-se em muitas áreas para que possamos recomendá-lo.

Em última análise, o Galaxy A10 é um smartphone de orçamento sólido, se você pode ignorar a estranha tomada de decisão da Samsung. No entanto, a falta de recursos básicos, como o brilho automático e um sensor de digitais, pode fazer com que muitas pessoas procurem outra coisa.

Samsung Galaxy A10 - 10/31/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
72%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
38 / 70 → 54%
Peso
91%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
7 / 64 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
48 / 86 → 56%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
48%
Médio
69%
75%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A10: Poder em plástico
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-21 (Update: 2019-08-23)