Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018)

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/03/2018

Noite e dia. Com o Galaxy A6 (2018), a Samsung traz para o mercado um smartphone de gama média e de aparência chique, que ganha pontos importantes com sua tela Super AMOLED de 5,6 polegadas e duas câmeras de 16 MP. Em nossa análise, o smartphone Android prova ser muito capaz, mas tem alguns pontos fracos.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Galaxy Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.6 polegadas 18.5:9, 1480 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, 16 Mio. Farben, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões MicroSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de movimento, sensor de digitais, sensor de proximidade, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, Smart Ready, ANT+
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, ​900, ​1800, ​1900 MHz), UMTS (850, ​900, ​1900, ​2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Downloads bis 300 Mb/s, Uploads bis 50 Mb/s, Kopf-SAR 0,467 W/kg, Körper-SAR 1,386 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 149.9 x 70.9
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7 aperture, 4608x3456 para fotos, [email protected] FPS para vídeo
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.9 aperture, 4608x3456 para fotos, [email protected] FPS para vídeo
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um alto-falante no lado esquerdo perto da parte superior, Teclado: virtual, carregador modular, cabo USB (USB Type-A para micro USB Type-B), fones, ferramenta de remoção de cartão SIM, guia de início rápido, Samsung Experience 9.0, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
309 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼81% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼78% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=225)
194 MBit/s ∼63% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
120 MBit/s ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼17% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼90% +128%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.7 - 703, n=225)
188 MBit/s ∼60% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼54% +36%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼48% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
123 MBit/s ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Entire route
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Entire route
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Entire route
Garmin Edge 500: Entire route
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
445
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 481 cd/m² Médio: 458.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 453 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
26%
9%
-131%
27%
-15%
Brightness middle
453
539
19%
454
0%
458
1%
761
68%
620
37%
Brightness
459
542
18%
463
1%
473
3%
723
58%
612
33%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
86
-8%
88
-5%
90
-3%
96
3%
Black Level *
0.51
0.69
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.6
38%
2
23%
7.1
-173%
2.4
8%
3.46
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
2.6
72%
5.3
42%
14.5
-58%
5.2
43%
7.88
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
10.5
-556%
1.8
-13%
3.9
-144%
Gamma
2.07 116%
2.28 105%
2.1 114%
2.28 105%
2.21 109%
2.073 116%
CCT
6356 102%
6422 101%
6394 102%
8951 73%
6312 103%
7230 90%
Contrast
898
1103
1088

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10647 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.5 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
46779 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼85% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼66% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼92% +42%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼84% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (44191 - 47339, n=7)
45754 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=320)
70784 Points ∼99% +51%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
61794 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
61811 Points ∼57% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼76% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼84% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼71% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 61825, n=3)
61810 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43031 - 290397, n=98)
107922 Points ∼100% +75%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3809 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼83% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼76% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points ∼99% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3722 - 3889, n=5)
3793 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3210 - 8601, n=187)
4502 Points ∼92% +18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4878 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼84% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points ∼97% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼99% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3691 - 5006, n=7)
4748 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3247 - 10264, n=350)
4702 Points ∼80% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼87% +10%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (10 - 737, n=7)
593 Points ∼64% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=426)
674 Points ∼73% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
533 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼100% +187%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼35% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼66% +90%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼100% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67% +91%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (511 - 534, n=7)
526 Points ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=426)
1517 Points ∼99% +185%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1096 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼84% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼69% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼64% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1096 - 1362, n=7)
1252 Points ∼83% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=426)
1119 Points ∼74% +2%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2201 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼74% +18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼68% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼100% +59%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼93% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼93% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2127 - 2368, n=7)
2239 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=426)
2236 Points ∼64% +2%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
985 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼92% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼23% -64%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼86% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (353 - 1022, n=7)
908 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=429)
1136 Points ∼74% +15%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼84%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2332 - 2371, n=3)
2357 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone (1113 - 14362, n=123)
3944 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3741 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼86% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3704 - 3777, n=4)
3733 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1847 - 10558, n=169)
4050 Points ∼93% +8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼61% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼77% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼68% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼72% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (726 - 736, n=4)
732 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (661 - 4265, n=170)
1201 Points ∼100% +64%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1709 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼71% -11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼85% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1727, n=7)
1668 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=276)
1563 Points ∼73% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
211 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼66% +236%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼19% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼35% +80%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼67% +242%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼35% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (185 - 253, n=7)
223 Points ∼21% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5220, n=276)
1075 Points ∼100% +409%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
262 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼79% +211%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼24% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼45% +77%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼81% +218%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼45% +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (231 - 312, n=7)
277 Points ∼27% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=284)
1028 Points ∼100% +292%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1705 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼82% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼72% -10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼97% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1705, n=7)
1641 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=307)
1459 Points ∼69% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
264 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼73% +299%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼19% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼50% +175%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼87% +377%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼51% +177%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (264 - 407, n=7)
344 Points ∼24% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=307)
1442 Points ∼100% +446%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
325 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼86% +255%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼25% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼63% +161%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼100% +315%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼63% +163%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (325 - 490, n=7)
416 Points ∼31% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=315)
1240 Points ∼92% +282%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6184 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼77% +111%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼76% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼100% +176%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼75% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼91% +152%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6184 - 12955, n=7)
11813 Points ∼69% +91%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=460)
12163 Points ∼71% +97%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5376 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼72% +148%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼40% +39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼72% +147%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼100% +243%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼72% +146%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5376 - 7793, n=7)
7104 Points ∼39% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=460)
15644 Points ∼85% +191%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5537 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼79% +139%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼49% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼83% +152%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼100% +204%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼81% +147%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5537 - 8550, n=7)
7789 Points ∼46% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=461)
13503 Points ∼80% +144%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
12 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼35% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼88% +150%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (12 - 12, n=7)
12 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=485)
27.1 fps ∼80% +126%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
19 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼36% -37%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼67% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼85% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (11 - 20, n=7)
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=488)
23.6 fps ∼72% +24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5.4 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +178%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼34% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼65% +81%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼93% +159%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼66% +83%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.9 - 5.4, n=7)
5.07 fps ∼34% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=410)
14.4 fps ∼96% +167%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
10 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼34% -49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼64% -4%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼87% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼63% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.5 - 10, n=7)
8.29 fps ∼55% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=412)
14.5 fps ∼97% +45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3.2 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼72% +184%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼26% +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼50% +100%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼77% +206%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼51% +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 3.3, n=7)
3 fps ∼24% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=275)
12.7 fps ∼100% +297%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6.9 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼71% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼25% -54%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼50% -9%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼74% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼49% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2.8 - 7.4, n=7)
5.93 fps ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=277)
12.7 fps ∼100% +84%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼60% +160%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼22% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼40% +75%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼64% +180%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼40% +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.8 - 2, n=7)
1.9 fps ∼22% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 35, n=206)
8.69 fps ∼100% +335%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼66% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼24% -52%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼44% -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼67% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼43% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 4, n=7)
3.21 fps ∼41% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 50, n=209)
7.9 fps ∼100% +98%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=342)
34.4 Points ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼94% +54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼81% +34%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼78% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼76% +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.9 - 26.4, n=7)
24.3 Points ∼71% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼67% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
20.877 Points ∼61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼100% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=478)
5020 Points ∼96% +34%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼95% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼87% +22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼84% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼84% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3739 - 4968, n=7)
4228 Points ∼80% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
3739 Points ∼71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=497)
11859 ms * ∼100% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
11807.6 ms * ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼92% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼83% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11808, n=7)
8761 ms * ∼74% +26%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼74% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼58% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼54% +45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼96% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=238)
98.3 Points ∼88% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
89 Points ∼79%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 89, n=7)
72.3 Points ∼65% -19%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Samsung Galaxy J7 2017BQ Aquaris X ProMotorola Moto G6 PlusXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-10%
18%
130%
51%
8%
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-24%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
59.46
-9%
45.2 (9.34 - 87.1, n=90)
-31%
43 (20.8 - 87.1, n=253)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.38
4%
64.7 (15.6 - 96.5, n=90)
-21%
61.4 (36.5 - 96.5, n=253)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
10.68
12.13
14%
10.54
-1%
12.07
13%
62.76
488%
7.1
-34%
17.4 (0.75 - 74.9, n=130)
63%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=532)
27%
Random Read 4KB
24.54
22.41
-9%
25.86
5%
37.97
55%
58.39
138%
79.5
224%
34.1 (3.59 - 117, n=130)
39%
34.2 (1.59 - 173, n=532)
39%
Sequential Write 256KB
100.64
77.1
-23%
52.98
-47%
139.63
39%
216.09
115%
194.5
93%
90.9 (14.8 - 168, n=130)
-10%
70.7 (2.99 - 216, n=532)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
208.44
182.03
-13%
198.47
-5%
270.46
30%
286.64
38%
270
30%
224 (25.8 - 440, n=130)
7%
210 (12.1 - 832, n=532)
1%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high HD26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (min)
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
26
   ...
Motorola Moto X Play
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
27
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032
 400 MSM8226, Adreno 305
29
   ...
Razer Phone 2017 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
61
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Balanced13 fps
Carga Máxima
 28.1 °C28 °C27.7 °C 
 29.3 °C28.4 °C27.9 °C 
 29 °C27.9 °C27.7 °C 
Máximo: 29.3 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C
27.5 °C27.5 °C27.1 °C
28.1 °C28.2 °C27.8 °C
27.6 °C28 °C28.1 °C
Máximo: 28.2 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  23.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.92532.938.73137.236.94031.737.95039.6376328.335.48027.332.910026.93212526.738.81602443.220020.947.225020.951.331519.556.240018.563.550017.566.863017.569.680015.772.8100015.872.4125016.675.6160015.872200015.471.9250015.574.231501671.2400015.880.750001679.9630016.372.8800016.372.71000016.271.41250016.465.51600016.463.2SPL28.687N1.167.8median 16.4Samsung Galaxy A6 2018median 71.2Delta2.17.831.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.533.332.438.23534.145.534.934.343.336.928.627.925.825.524.224.32130.52141.520.150.119.955.818.260.417.964.517.667.916.472.916.572.715.875.315.474.715.174.115.273.815.274.615.177.715.17615.178.215.176.415.27115.267.315.360.715.144.427.986.9170median 15.4Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plusmedian 711.810.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.27 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.81 / 1.26 / 1.3 Watt
Carga midlight 2.87 / 4.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
31%
-28%
-13%
-73%
-17%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.64
21%
0.39
52%
0.67
17%
0.5
38%
0.7
14%
0.69 (0.37 - 1.18, n=7)
15%
0.86 (0.2 - 3.4, n=557)
-6%
Idle Average *
1.26
1.36
-8%
1.06
16%
1.7
-35%
1.78
-41%
2.8
-122%
1.966 (0.78 - 4.65, n=7)
-56%
1.694 (0.6 - 6.2, n=556)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.4
-8%
1.08
17%
1.78
-37%
1.81
-39%
3.4
-162%
2.06 (0.84 - 4.74, n=7)
-58%
1.934 (0.74 - 6.6, n=557)
-49%
Load Average *
2.87
2.53
12%
1.82
37%
4.42
-54%
3.3
-15%
4.2
-46%
2.85 (1.52 - 5.75, n=7)
1%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=551)
-38%
Load Maximum *
4.82
3.63
25%
3.21
33%
6.3
-31%
5.14
-7%
7.2
-49%
4.21 (2.75 - 6.97, n=7)
13%
5.59 (1.2 - 14.2, n=551)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
26h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 01min
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
43%
-2%
6%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1616
2418
50%
1950
21%
1840
14%
1846
14%
H.264
868
984
13%
1096
26%
644
-26%
542
-38%
WiFi v1.3
608
843
39%
904
49%
730
20%
702
15%
497
-18%
Load
301
467
55%
525
74%
254
-16%
404
34%

Pro

+ Design chique, confortável se segurar
+ Armazenamento interno expansível
+ Android 8.0
+ Dual SIM mais microSD
+ Tela brilhante com ótima reprodução de cores
+ Permanece frio durante o funcionamento
+ Ótima duração da bateria

Contra

- Não é resistente à água nem à poeira
- Micro-USB 2.0 en vez de USB-C
- Wi-Fi lento
- PWM flickering
- Não suporta carga rápida
- Desempenho medíocre
In review: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Galaxy A6 (2018), a Samsung oferece um bom smartphone de gama média, que tem de competir com concorrentes capazes. Ele tem várias vantagens, mas também tem muitas desvantagens.

O Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de gama média, que se desempenha pior do que o seu antecessor, o Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), em várias áreas.

O Galaxy A6 (2018) ganha muitos pontos com o seu bom design, tela brilhante e bem calibrada e longa duração de bateria. Ele também possui Android (8.0 Oreo) atualizado, funcionalidade Dual-SIM real e armazenamento expansível (o armazenamento interno pode ser expandido com a ajuda de um cartão MicroSD). O módulo da câmera não funciona muito bem: A câmera principal de 16 PM produz fotos “boas” durante o dia, mas sofre em condições de baixa luminosidade.

 

O Galaxy A6 (2018) de 309 euros ($362) vem com algumas desvantagens. A porta Micro-USB está muito desatualizada. Outras desvantagens incluem: Wi-Fi lento, a falta de certificação IP e longos tempos de carga. Com o seu SoC Exynos 7870 e unidade gráfica ARM Mali T830 MP2, o Galaxy A6 (2018) oferece muito desempenho para o uso no dia-a-dia. No entanto, não é nem de longe suficientemente poderoso para jogos. Em resumo, o antecessor, o Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), é uma melhor opção, se você não precisa de funcionalidade Dual-SIM. Oferece mais desempenho a um preço menor.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 - 06/28/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 69%
Peso
91%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
14 / 63 → 23%
Desempenho da aplicação
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
68%
Médio
73%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018)
Manuel Masiero, 2018-07- 3 (Update: 2018-07-10)