Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/24/2018

Quality does not have to be expensive. Com o Redmi Note 5A Prime, a Xiaomi oferece um dispositivo robusto de 5,5 polegadas por um preço baixo. Além de uma câmera selfie de 16 MP, ele vem com um sensor de infravermelhos por menos de 200 Euros (~$233). Nesta análise, esclarecemos que compromissos devem ser feitos devido ao baixo preço recomendado pela fabricante.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Redmi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, capacitiva, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (B2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (B1/2/5/8), 4G FDD-LTE (B1/3/4/5/7/8/20), 4G TDD-LTE (B38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 153 x 76.2
Bateria
3080 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 32 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 240 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1080p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED flash, [email protected]
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 speaker, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo MicroUSB, Ferramenta SIM, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0,504 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1,683 W/kg
peso
153 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼100% +281%
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 MBit/s ∼28% +5%
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s ∼27% +2%
Gigaset GS185
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s ∼27% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 MBit/s ∼26%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼22% -16%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼100% +258%
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.6 MBit/s ∼29% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 MBit/s ∼28%
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.1 MBit/s ∼28% -1%
Gigaset GS185
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s ∼27% -4%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼23% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Test chart Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Test chart (detail) Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
474
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 480 cd/m² Médio: 463.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 469 cd/m²
Contraste: 782:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Alcatel 3X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
HTC Desire 12 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Umidigi S2 Lite
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Gigaset GS185
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
18%
-26%
1%
-43%
Brightness middle
469
429
-9%
418
-11%
701
49%
426
-9%
Brightness
464
421
-9%
414
-11%
720
55%
412
-11%
Brightness Distribution
92
84
-9%
93
1%
87
-5%
86
-7%
Black Level *
0.6
0.13
78%
0.7
-17%
0.5
17%
0.7
-17%
Contrast
782
3300
322%
597
-24%
1402
79%
609
-22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.31
4.86
-47%
4.2
-27%
4.97
-50%
5.3
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.68
8.83
-32%
8.3
-24%
13.31
-99%
10.2
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
6
-150%
4.7
-96%
3.3
-38%
6.3
-163%
Gamma
2.155 102%
2.231 99%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
2.4 92%
CCT
6626 98%
8103 80%
7394 88%
8056 81%
8073 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
45762 Points ∼61%
Alcatel 3X
31718 Points ∼42% -31%
Umidigi S2 Lite
43125 Points ∼58% -6%
Gigaset GS185
37339 Points ∼50% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (42643 - 46814, n=10)
44705 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼100% +63%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
57683 Points ∼50%
Alcatel 3X
42032 Points ∼36% -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
56497 Points ∼49% -2%
Umidigi S2 Lite
56639 Points ∼49% -2%
Gigaset GS185
45092 Points ∼39% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (56672 - 57683, n=3)
57083 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=160)
115872 Points ∼100% +101%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3702 Points ∼78%
Alcatel 3X
3210 Points ∼67% -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
4759 Points ∼100% +29%
Umidigi S2 Lite
3348 Points ∼70% -10%
Gigaset GS185
3229 Points ∼68% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3606 - 3928, n=10)
3757 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=243)
4492 Points ∼94% +21%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Points ∼0%
Alcatel 3X
4711 Points ∼87%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
5393 Points ∼100%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4371 Points ∼81%
Gigaset GS185
3961 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4779 - 5438, n=10)
4445 Points ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=410)
4890 Points ∼91%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
729 Points ∼96%
Alcatel 3X
9 Points ∼1% -99%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
756 Points ∼100% +4%
Umidigi S2 Lite
607 Points ∼80% -17%
Gigaset GS185
632 Points ∼84% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (10 - 744, n=8)
525 Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=486)
690 Points ∼91% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
788 Points ∼47%
Alcatel 3X
150 Points ∼9% -81%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
965 Points ∼57% +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
645 Points ∼38% -18%
Gigaset GS185
440 Points ∼26% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (591 - 789, n=8)
755 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=486)
1688 Points ∼100% +114%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
791 Points ∼65%
Alcatel 3X
982 Points ∼81% +24%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
849 Points ∼70% +7%
Umidigi S2 Lite
840 Points ∼69% +6%
Gigaset GS185
617 Points ∼51% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (557 - 1224, n=8)
847 Points ∼70% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=486)
1210 Points ∼100% +53%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1774 Points ∼61%
Alcatel 3X
1302 Points ∼45% -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2898 Points ∼100% +63%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1870 Points ∼65% +5%
Gigaset GS185
1217 Points ∼42% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1489 - 1980, n=8)
1732 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=486)
2447 Points ∼84% +38%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
948 Points ∼78%
Alcatel 3X
206 Points ∼17% -78%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1158 Points ∼95% +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
886 Points ∼72% -7%
Gigaset GS185
676 Points ∼55% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (282 - 1072, n=8)
778 Points ∼64% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=490)
1223 Points ∼100% +29%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2204 Points ∼50%
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1762 Points ∼40% -20%
Gigaset GS185
1460 Points ∼33% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1782 - 2321, n=7)
2058 Points ∼47% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=184)
4424 Points ∼100% +101%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2576 Points ∼61%
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3272 Points ∼77% +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite
2671 Points ∼63% +4%
Gigaset GS185
1871 Points ∼44% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2210 - 2889, n=9)
2613 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=233)
4232 Points ∼100% +64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
678 Points ∼54%
Alcatel 3X
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
741 Points ∼59% +9%
Umidigi S2 Lite
624 Points ∼50% -8%
Gigaset GS185
683 Points ∼55% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (637 - 678, n=9)
660 Points ∼53% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=234)
1250 Points ∼100% +84%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1148 Points ∼70%
Alcatel 3X
546 Points ∼33% -52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1521 Points ∼93% +32%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1170 Points ∼72% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1016 - 1340, n=10)
1197 Points ∼73% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=340)
1630 Points ∼100% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
265 Points ∼23%
Alcatel 3X
76 Points ∼6% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
367 Points ∼31% +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite
317 Points ∼27% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (188 - 281, n=10)
257 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=340)
1175 Points ∼100% +343%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
320 Points ∼29%
Alcatel 3X
94 Points ∼8% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
441 Points ∼39% +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite
378 Points ∼34% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (230 - 341, n=10)
311 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=348)
1121 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1107 Points ∼73%
Alcatel 3X
538 Points ∼35% -51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1504 Points ∼99% +36%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1127 Points ∼74% +2%
Gigaset GS185
867 Points ∼57% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (995 - 1360, n=10)
1196 Points ∼79% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=371)
1517 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
533 Points ∼33%
Alcatel 3X
125 Points ∼8% -77%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
716 Points ∼45% +34%
Umidigi S2 Lite
477 Points ∼30% -11%
Gigaset GS185
54 Points ∼3% -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (404 - 543, n=10)
521 Points ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=371)
1592 Points ∼100% +199%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
602 Points ∼44%
Alcatel 3X
151 Points ∼11% -75%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
810 Points ∼60% +35%
Umidigi S2 Lite
547 Points ∼40% -9%
Gigaset GS185
68 Points ∼5% -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (465 - 620, n=10)
595 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=379)
1354 Points ∼100% +125%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
9027 Points ∼66%
Alcatel 3X
9188 Points ∼68% +2%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13596 Points ∼100% +51%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9984 Points ∼73% +11%
Gigaset GS185
10496 Points ∼77% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7095 - 9345, n=10)
8887 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=525)
12683 Points ∼93% +41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
10202 Points ∼58%
Alcatel 3X
2898 Points ∼17% -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12347 Points ∼70% +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9716 Points ∼55% -5%
Gigaset GS185
5474 Points ∼31% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7924 - 10302, n=10)
9970 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=525)
17522 Points ∼100% +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
9915 Points ∼67%
Alcatel 3X
3418 Points ∼23% -66%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12604 Points ∼86% +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9774 Points ∼66% -1%
Gigaset GS185
6125 Points ∼42% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (8137 - 9961, n=10)
9688 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=526)
14738 Points ∼100% +49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
17 fps ∼56%
Alcatel 3X
4.9 fps ∼16% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
21 fps ∼70% +24%
Umidigi S2 Lite
17 fps ∼56% 0%
Gigaset GS185
7.6 fps ∼25% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11 - 25, n=10)
17 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=550)
30.2 fps ∼100% +78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
20 fps ∼59%
Alcatel 3X
9 fps ∼26% -55%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
34 fps ∼100% +70%
Umidigi S2 Lite
25 fps ∼74% +25%
Gigaset GS185
13 fps ∼38% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (9.7 - 27, n=10)
19.4 fps ∼57% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=553)
24.4 fps ∼72% +22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
7.6 fps ∼47%
Alcatel 3X
2.2 fps ∼14% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
9.2 fps ∼57% +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite
6.9 fps ∼43% -9%
Gigaset GS185
2.8 fps ∼17% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.6 - 15, n=10)
7.51 fps ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=472)
16.2 fps ∼100% +113%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
15 fps ∼83%
Alcatel 3X
5 fps ∼28% -67%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
18 fps ∼100% +20%
Umidigi S2 Lite
13 fps ∼72% -13%
Gigaset GS185
5.6 fps ∼31% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.5 - 16, n=10)
10.8 fps ∼60% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=475)
15.5 fps ∼86% +3%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
4.9 fps ∼36%
Alcatel 3X
1.3 fps ∼9% -73%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
6 fps ∼43% +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4.6 fps ∼33% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.3 - 5, n=10)
4.03 fps ∼29% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=335)
13.8 fps ∼100% +182%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
11 fps ∼81%
Alcatel 3X
3.1 fps ∼23% -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13 fps ∼96% +18%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9.9 fps ∼73% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3.5 - 12, n=10)
8.45 fps ∼63% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=338)
13.5 fps ∼100% +23%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2.7 fps ∼28%
Alcatel 3X
0.77 fps ∼8% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3.4 fps ∼35% +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite
2.4 fps ∼25% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 2.7, n=10)
2.52 fps ∼26% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=267)
9.62 fps ∼100% +256%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
5.6 fps ∼65%
Alcatel 3X
1.6 fps ∼18% -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
7 fps ∼81% +25%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4.8 fps ∼55% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 5.9, n=10)
4.07 fps ∼47% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=270)
8.68 fps ∼100% +55%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS185 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 88869, n=408)
254 Points ∼100% +1347%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
22.158 Points ∼9% +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
19.177 Points ∼8% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (16.5 - 20.6, n=10)
18.2 Points ∼7% +4%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
17.765 Points ∼7% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
17.549 Points ∼7%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
15.406 Points ∼6% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=545)
5462 Points ∼100% +66%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
3993 Points ∼73% +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
3506 Points ∼64% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
3293 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2689 - 3314, n=10)
3102 Points ∼57% -6%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
3084 Points ∼56% -6%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
2838 Points ∼52% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
17274.5 ms * ∼100% -27%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
13666.4 ms * ∼79% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
13586.4 ms * ∼79%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
13114 ms * ∼76% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11007 - 13586, n=10)
12580 ms * ∼73% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=565)
11590 ms * ∼67% +15%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
11571.8 ms * ∼67% +15%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A PrimeAlcatel 3XHTC Desire 12 PlusUmidigi S2 LiteGigaset GS185Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-2%
-19%
-25%
-17%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
59.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
56.5
-6%
59.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-22%
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
77.5
-8%
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-21%
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
17.15
9.62
-44%
9.16
-47%
11.6
-32%
9.05
-47%
18.6 (0.75 - 77.3, n=148)
8%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=594)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
47.87
26.05
-46%
65.67
37%
36.4
-24%
31.71
-34%
36.2 (3.59 - 117, n=148)
-24%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=594)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.33
127.7
6%
135.55
13%
75
-38%
45.54
-62%
94.4 (14.8 - 189, n=148)
-22%
78.2 (2.99 - 246, n=594)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.13
260.55
-9%
252.8
-12%
271
-6%
275.68
-4%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=148)
-20%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=594)
-21%
Carga Máxima
 42.3 °C38.7 °C38.8 °C 
 40.9 °C37.5 °C40.6 °C 
 39.9 °C37.8 °C38.8 °C 
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 39.5 °C
34.9 °C39.4 °C42.6 °C
35.8 °C38.9 °C40 °C
35.9 °C38.9 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202728.52525.938.53129.535.34031.441.65032.640.36324.124.98023.122.810024.123.312517.21916016.619.620016.830.425016.436.431514.138.340013.853.250013.657.763012.161.280011.563.8100011.566.7125011.267.8160011.266.7200011.268.4250011.271.2315011.169.3400011.269.6500011.269.3630011.466.3800011.464.41000011.360.21250011.449.51600011.432.6SPL66.757.96023.979.6N19.310.913.70.542.5median 11.4median 61.2Delta1.814.842.643.938.437.734.228.337.330.93030.826.627.523.223.721.223.72123.916.326.416.630.115.833.113.539.412.246.81249.711.755.110.560.49.661.29.560958.18.558.28.561.58.364.48.268.48.167.78.1618.161.38.259.78.344.68.233.951.721.959.974.97.10.31231.5median 9.5median 58.12.811.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 5A PrimeUmidigi S2 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.4 / 2.9 Watt
Carga midlight 4 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3080 mAh
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Gigaset GS185
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
31%
10%
35%
1%
24%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
2
-11%
0.68
62%
0.8
56%
0.54
70%
1.416 (0.57 - 4.02, n=10)
21%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
51%
Idle Average *
2.4
2.5
-4%
2.05
15%
1.6
33%
1.74
27%
2.65 (1.4 - 6, n=10)
-10%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
3.2
-10%
2.12
27%
3.5
-21%
1.78
39%
2.96 (1.62 - 6.64, n=10)
-2%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
31%
Load Average *
4
5.2
-30%
3
25%
4.6
-15%
3.55
11%
4.36 (2.89 - 7.34, n=10)
-9%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
-1%
Load Maximum *
6.3
6.3
-0%
4.57
27%
6.5
-3%
4.66
26%
5.99 (4 - 9.6, n=10)
5%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 47min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3080 mAh
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Gigaset GS185
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
647
675
4%
545
-16%
645
0%
658
2%

Pro

+ Duração da bateria sólida
+ Boa relação de preço-desempenho
+ Sensor infravermelho

Contra

- Tela com relação de contraste baixa
- Sem USB Type-C
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Test device supplied by:
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Test device supplied by:

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime oferece um smartphone sólido para usuários que valorizam muito uma boa câmera frontal. Na maioria dos benchmarks, o smartphone Xiaomi ultrapassa os dispositivos na mesma faixa de preço em termos de desempenho do sistema; apenas aplicativos graficamente exigentes funcionam um pouco mais devagar no telefone Redmi.

Compradores em potencial podem esperar um smartphone com boa duração de bateria, um monitor de 5,5 polegadas e uma câmera decente. O Redmi Note 5A Prime é mais do que capaz de lidar com fotos ocasionais, aplicativos simples e jogos menos exigentes.

O Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime é um bom smartphone para usuários casuais e brilha com sua boa relação preço-desempenho.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime - 07/15/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
74%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
79%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
21 / 63 → 33%
Desempenho da aplicação
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
88 / 91 → 97%
Camera
75%
Médio
72%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-08- 1)