Revisão HP Omen 17 (2023): O laptop para jogos usa RTX 4080

Name: HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Brand: HP

Jogador de alto nível. Um Core i9-13900HX e GeForce RTX 4080 fornecem desempenho suficiente para processamento de vídeo, renderização e jogos QHD. O teclado do laptop também oferece iluminação individual das teclas, seis teclas macro e muito espaço para as teclas de seta.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/31/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

O modelo 2023 do Omen 17, que é um laptop de alto nível para jogos, usa o mesmo caso que já conhecemos do antecessor, mas inclui o hardware atual: O laptop é executado por Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace chips. A HP combina um Core i9 com uma GPU RTX 4080, pedindo quase 3.300 euros ($3.582) para o pacote completo. Os concorrentes incluem laptops tais como o Alienware m17 R5oLâmina Razer 16 (Início de 2023)oAsus ROG Strix G16 G614JZe o Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.

Você pode encontrar informações sobre a caixa, equipamentos, dispositivos de entrada e alto-falantes em nosso revisão do modelo antecessorque é idêntico nesses aspectos.

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng

Processador

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2010 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3118, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE BOE09BF, IPS, Brilhante: não, 165 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Disco rígido

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB

, 893 GB livre

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: combo audio port, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 397.1 x 262

Bateria

83 Wh, 6880 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.766 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.154 kg

Preço

3299 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.4 %	03/2023	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
86.1 %	01/2023	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3.4 kg	26.7 mm	17.00"	3840x2160
91.2 %	02/2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.4 %	02/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 %	03/2023	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	30.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Comparação de tamanho

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 DIN A4 ❌

Esquerda: alimentação, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), combo de áudio, leitor de cartões de armazenamento (SD)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years)	98.9 MB/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years)	122.3 MB/s +44%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	85 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1579 (848^min - 1696^max) MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1545 (1189^min - 1625^max) MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1467 (733^min - 1546^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)	1274 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=188)	1242 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	981 MBit/s -33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1627 (1381^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1619 (1537^min - 1665^max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1557 (795^min - 1691^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)	1405 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=188)	1392 MBit/s -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	968 MBit/s -41%

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1443 (733-1546)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1381-1714)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)

ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck2097ng: 10.63 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 20.42 ∆E

Display - QHD incluindo cobertura sRGB

Enquanto neste ponto muitos concorrentes preferem usar displays 16:10, a HP permanece fiel ao formato 16:9 no Omen. Uma característica positiva é que o painel 165-Hz responsivo não mostra nenhum PWM cintilando em qualquer nível de brilho.

O brilho e o contraste da tela mate de 17,3 polegadas (2.560 x 1.440 pixels) satisfazem os requisitos (> 300 cd/m² e 1.000:1). Entretanto, o display Omen oferece o menor brilho entre os displays de nossos concorrentes. O Legion 7 Pro tem aqui o painel mais brilhante.


337 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
334 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	358 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	336 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE BOE09BF tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 371 cd/m²
Contraste: 1159:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.00	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		24%	26%	2%	23%	-11%
Display P3 Coverage	67.4	97.2 44%	98.5 46%	69.1 3%	97 44%	59.03 -12%
sRGB Coverage	97.6	99.6 2%	100 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	87.46 -10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	88.4 27%	89.7 29%	71.2 2%	84.9 22%	61.04 -12%
Response Times		-18%	12%	28%	47%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)	16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6) -5%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 58%	12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6) 21%	5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8) 67%	14 ?(7, 7) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2)	11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4) -30%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -35%	5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7) 34%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2) 26%	10 ?(6, 4) -12%
PWM Frequency						100 ?(50)
Screen		-88%	-12%	25%	3%	-15%
Brightness middle	371	484 30%	456.8 23%	511 38%	470 27%	321 -13%
Brightness	350	449 28%	437 25%	469 34%	459 31%	302 -14%
Brightness Distribution	90	87 -3%	83 -8%	86 -4%	93 3%	84 -7%
Black Level *	0.32	0.55 -72%	0.35 -9%	0.4 -25%	0.42 -31%	0.41 -28%
Contrast	1159	880 -24%	1305 13%	1278 10%	1119 -3%	783 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.74	4.8 -176%	3.7 -113%	0.95 45%	1.86 -7%	1.62 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.59	7.48 -108%	6.42 -79%	2.07 42%	3.87 -8%	4.08 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.01	4.74 -369%	0.66 35%	0.91 10%	0.93 8%	1.93 -91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	5.5 -96%	2.6 7%	0.6 79%	2.7 4%	1.24 56%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.3 ^96%	2.176 ^101%	2.246 ^98%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6474 ^100%	6148 ^106%	6108 ^106%	6545 ^99%	6711 ^97%	6261 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-27% / -54%	9% / -0%	18% / 21%	24% / 13%	-9% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

No estado de entrega, a reprodução da cor já é muito boa e pode ser melhorada ainda mais com uma calibração, o que faz com que o desvio da cor caia de 1,74 para 1 (valor alvo < 3). Além disso, a escala de cinza também é então reproduzida de forma mais uniforme.

O visor é capaz de cobrir o espaço de cor sRGB quase completamente, mas não os espaços de cor AdobeRGB e DCI-P3. Os mostradores da maioria dos concorrentes têm melhor desempenho aqui, com apenas o painel do Legionque variam no mesmo nível.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.7 ms rise
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.3 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Os ângulos de visão do painel IPS são estáveis, de modo que pode ser lido de qualquer ângulo de visão. O display pode ser lido ao ar livre, desde que não haja luz solar direta.

Desempenho - O laptop HP oferece hardware poderoso

Com o Omen 17, a Hewlett Packard oferece um laptop de 17,3 polegadas que é direcionado para jogos QHD, mas também atinge uma boa figura em outras áreas de aplicação que exigem um alto desempenho. O desempenho computacional necessário é fornecido pelos chips Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace. Nossa unidade de teste do Omen está disponível por cerca de 3.300 euros (~$3.582).

Condições de teste

O software pré-instalado Omen Gaming Hub representa o centro de controle do laptop. Além de selecionar um modo de alimentação (ver tabela), ele também permite subvoltar a CPU e configurar uma curva individual do ventilador. Como o modo "Performance" criou alguns problemas em nossa unidade de teste (gagueira estranha e queda de performance), usamos principalmente o modo de potência "Balanceada" junto com o controle automático do ventilador. O Optimus foi ativado.

	Desempenho	Equilibrado	Eco
Limite de potência 1	100 Watt	55 Watt	55 Watt
Limite de potência 2	130 Watt	130 Watt	130 Watt

Processador

ONúcleo i9-13900HX(Raptor Lake) consiste em dezesseis núcleos de eficiência (sem hiperthreading, 1,6 a 3,9 GHz) e oito núcleos de desempenho (hiperthreading, 2,2 a 5,4 GHz), resultando em um total de 32 núcleos de CPU lógica.

Na operação de rede, o processador passa pelos testes de CPU do benchmark Cinebench R15 com velocidades de relógio de média-alta a alta (multi-tarefa) e alta a máxima (rosca única). Enquanto o desempenho de rosca única (254 pontos) cai ligeiramente na operação com bateria, a queda no desempenho de rosca múltipla é significativa (1.303 pontos).

Os resultados de referência variam no nível (linha única) da média para a CPU ou abaixo (multi-linha). Em geral, o modo "Desempenho" resulta apenas em uma ligeira vantagem de desempenho, sendo que os benchmarks da AIDA são os que mais lucram. Por outro lado, também fará com que a velocidade da CPU permaneça em um nível elevado sob carga multi-tarefa constante, como mostra o teste de loop CB15.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX; Leistung: Ø4174 (4028.2-4381.06)

Velocidades de relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Equilibrado)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante a execução do loop CB15 (Desempenho)

Velocidades do relógio da CPU durante o funcionamento do loop CB15 (Eco)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	84.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	83 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	81.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	77.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	75.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	60.9 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	48.4 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	30162 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	30139 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	27299 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	26407 Points
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19692 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	13872 Points -47%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2126 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2095 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	2077 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2043 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1821 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1554 Points -26%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	11510 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	11500 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	10537 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	10118 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7486 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5306 Points -48%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	818 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	796 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	788 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	701 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	612 Points -24%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	4819 (4429.68^min - 4819.28^max) Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)	4764 (4425.76^min - 4764.17^max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4731 (1123.72^min - 4730.93^max) Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	4381 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	4311 Points
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years)	3111 Points -28%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2315 (2247.19^min - 2314.81^max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	306 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)	296 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	300 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years)	269 Points -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	250 Points -17%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	221 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.4 Seconds * -30%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	153 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * +25%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	114 Seconds * +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	106 Seconds * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	122254 MIPS +29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	114658 MIPS +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	112526 MIPS +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	94649 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77655 MIPS -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	61988 MIPS -35%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	7035 MIPS +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	6925 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	6909 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	6811 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6145 MIPS -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5734 MIPS -17%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	21058 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	20245 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	19801 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	19433 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13697 Points -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10021 Points -51%
Single-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	2084 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2079 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1815 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1575 Points -24%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	31.9 fps +27%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	30.1 fps +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	29.7 fps +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	25.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.4 fps -15%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	16.8 fps -33%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	57.3 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	47.7 s * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	44.2 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 s * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	41.7 s * +6%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.486 sec * -26%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.468 sec * -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3979 sec * -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.387 sec * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3862 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4311 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

275 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

301 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	95.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	91.4 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88.8 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.7 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	62.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	27227 KRay/s +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	26741 KRay/s +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	25857 KRay/s +47%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	23990 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18752 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	17589 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	16202 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133668 Points +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	131131 Points +48%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125944 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	118518 Points +34%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	104841 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	94075 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	88686 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6750 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6596 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6350 MB/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	5888 MB/s +35%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	4362 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4359 MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	3457 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	143409 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134514 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	134227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133226 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	125644 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109963 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	105169 Points -22%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	17026 Points +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15813 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15807 Points +28%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	14959 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points +21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	12918 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	12334 Points
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12237 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	66753 Points +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	66336 Points +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	63308 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	59656 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	57695 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	48099 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	43850 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	128070 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	127698 MB/s +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125644 MB/s +41%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	114553 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	108239 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	89413 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	54897 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1936 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1912 MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1850 MB/s +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	1747 MB/s +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1284 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1220 MB/s -5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	854 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	14722 KRay/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	14671 KRay/s +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13844 KRay/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s +38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	12871 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10153 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	9481 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	8777 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50834 MPixel/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	50563 MPixel/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	50544 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	48626 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	37069 MPixel/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36937 MPixel/s -27%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	30343 MPixel/s -40%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema em bom funcionamento oferece desempenho computacional suficiente para áreas de aplicação ávidas de energia, tais como renderização e jogos. As taxas de transferência da faixa de memória de trabalho em níveis normais para armazenamento DDR5-5600. Elas são acompanhadas de bons resultados PC-Mark.

A memória de trabalho é executada em modo de canal duplo.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7609 - 8549, n=3)	7996 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7830 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7609 Points
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years)	7597 Points 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7292 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7223 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12031 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11824 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11703 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10982 - 11824, n=3)	11503 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years)	10733 Points -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10250 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10788 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (9976 - 10788, n=3)	10417 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9976 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years)	9731 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9090 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7686 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10135 - 14720, n=3)	11725 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years)	11496 Points +13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11296 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11058 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10319 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10135 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2182 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1991 - 2194, n=2)	2093 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1991 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=171, last 2 years)	1882 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1597 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -20%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2044 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1828 - 2059, n=2)	1944 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1828 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=171, last 2 years)	1792 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1565 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -17%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2400 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2239 - 2411, n=2)	2325 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2239 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=171, last 2 years)	2048 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1738 Points -22%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1990 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1808 - 1998, n=2)	1903 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1808 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=171, last 2 years)	1705 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1315 Points -27%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5074 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6244 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		7609 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77973 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77544 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	62189 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59647 MB/s -24%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	53008 MB/s -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50334 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86248 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85073 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72658 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63620 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	59935 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50996 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76988 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70939 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61811 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	59912 MB/s -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58827 MB/s -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.8 ns * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	94.6 ns * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.5 ns * -3%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.7 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

O teste padronizado do Monitor de Latência (navegação na web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, carga alta Prime95) revela algum comportamento conspícuo. O sistema não parece ser adequado para o processamento de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a algumas melhorias ou tornar as coisas ainda piores.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2505 μs * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2448.6 μs * -16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2103 μs *
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1366.3 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	437.7 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Solução de armazenamento

A Omen oferece espaço para duas SSDs PCIe 4 no formato M.2-2280. O PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) da SK Hynix que é usado aqui oferece taxas de transferência muito boas. Entretanto, nas partes posteriores do loop do DiskSpd, observamos algumas quedas ocasionais de desempenho, provavelmente devido à estrangulamento térmico.

Um SSD PCIe 4 serve como a unidade do sistema.

Há também um espaço para um segundo SSD.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7152 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6095 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 752.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5626 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 5120 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 286.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	92.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.1 pt
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	71 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	64.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	51.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4525 (4498.41^min - 4525.41^max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4093 (4067.17^min - 4092.59^max) MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3650 (3626.52^min - 3649.67^max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3848 (3815.64^min - 3848.21^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s 0%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2511 - 5665, n=16)	3732 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=197, last 2 years)	3533 MB/s -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3428 (3412.07^min - 3428.49^max) MB/s -11%
seq write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5145 (5060.48^min - 5145.38^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4378 (4355.78^min - 4378.43^max) MB/s -15%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (1690 - 5181, n=16)	3849 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=197, last 2 years)	3826 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3416 (3372.4^min - 3415.84^max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3366 (3313.08^min - 3366.35^max) MB/s -35%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3243 (3188.93^min - 3243.04^max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6508 - 7177, n=16)	6900 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6878 (6539.55^min - 6877.94^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6861 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6682 (5778.28^min - 6681.95^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=197, last 2 years)	6386 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5023 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5017 (4534.25^min - 5017.23^max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6110 (6082.58^min - 6110.11^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2382 - 6149, n=16)	5647 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4923.06^min - 4943.2^max) MB/s -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4831 (4610.18^min - 4830.79^max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=197, last 2 years)	4814 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3429 (3365.09^min - 3429.47^max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3387 (3363.41^min - 3386.9^max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	95.3 (93.25^min - 95.25^max) MB/s +19%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	80 (78.03^min - 80.03^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (54.3 - 85, n=16)	69.5 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=197, last 2 years)	67.7 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	62.5 (61.85^min - 62.46^max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.5 (60.59^min - 61.49^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	52.5 (50.71^min - 52.46^max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	289 (284.65^min - 288.96^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	255 (243.79^min - 255.25^max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	239 (230.87^min - 239.2^max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	236 (223.33^min - 235.64^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=197, last 2 years)	225 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s -24%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (77.7 - 335, n=16)	200 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	126.7 (123.88^min - 126.69^max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5829 (5404.65^min - 5828.67^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4100 (4085.58^min - 4100.1^max) MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=197, last 2 years)	2587 MB/s -56%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (353 - 5829, n=16)	2259 MB/s -61%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1533 (1526.72^min - 1532.76^max) MB/s -74%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1527 (1525.66^min - 1526.54^max) MB/s -74%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	843 (833.55^min - 843.1^max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3537 (3519.01^min - 3536.66^max) MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3208 (2280.32^min - 3207.74^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2783 (2698.54^min - 2783.41^max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2689 (2088.87^min - 2688.7^max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=197, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s -33%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (148.5 - 3719, n=16)	1318 MB/s -59%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s -60%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	288 (123^min - 287.76^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10330 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8224 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (4390 - 10562, n=15)	7122 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=185, last 2 years)	6824 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5610 Points -46%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4008 Points -61%
Score Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3448 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3188 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=185, last 2 years)	2501 Points -27%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (953 - 3793, n=15)	2109 Points -39%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1761 Points -49%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1250 Points -64%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5157 Points
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2690 - 5157, n=15)	3990 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3468 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=185, last 2 years)	3112 Points -40%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3010 Points -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points -53%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2211 Points -57%
Seq Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5861.95 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5429.33 MB/s -7%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3522 - 5892, n=15)	5256 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=185, last 2 years)	4961 MB/s -15%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4716 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4308.28 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5242.91 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4064.76 MB/s -22%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2489 - 5880, n=15)	3971 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=185, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2890.58 MB/s -45%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2671 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.9 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=185, last 2 years)	66.8 MB/s +5%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (56 - 79.4, n=15)	65.7 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	63.85 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	58.78 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.14 MB/s -23%
4K Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	251.87 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	220.74 MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (144.4 - 286, n=15)	219 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=185, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	205.06 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -43%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	120.14 MB/s -52%
4K-64 Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2798.41 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2558.72 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=185, last 2 years)	1933 MB/s -31%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (359 - 3131, n=15)	1518 MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1271.5 MB/s -55%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	728.79 MB/s -74%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4380.62 MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2206 - 4381, n=15)	3374 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2856.24 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=185, last 2 years)	2536 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2499.95 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s -56%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1824.12 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.087 ms * -112%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=183, last 2 years)	0.05342 ms * -30%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.041 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.03 - 0.062, n=15)	0.03867 ms * +6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.031 ms * +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.025 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -356%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=185, last 2 years)	0.04649 ms * -158%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.069, n=15)	0.03433 ms * -91%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.032 ms * -78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.019 ms * -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.017 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6777 (3480.47-7122.14)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)

Placa Gráfica

Com oGeForce RTX 4080gPU para laptop, a HP usa o atual número dois do portfólio de GPU móvel da Nvidia. Ela tem 7.424 shaders, um ônibus de 192 bits, e é capaz de usar o rápido armazenamento GDDR6 (12.288 MB). O RTX 4080 é configurado com um TGP de 175 watts (150 W + 25 W Dynamic Boost), que é o máximo configurável de acordo com a Nvidia. De acordo com nosso teste The Witcher 3, o TGP não é totalmente utilizado.

Os resultados de referência variam abaixo da média das GPUs RTX 4080 que testamos até agora. O perfil "Performance" levará a alguns pequenos aumentos ocasionais na performance gráfica. O modo dGPU não levará a nenhuma outra melhoria. A troca entre o dGPU e o Optimus não requer reinício - o Optimus avançado é suportado.

Fire Strike (funcionamento em rede, Equilibrado)

Fire Strike (funcionamento por bateria, balanceado)

Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho)

Fire Strike (operação de rede, desempenho, dGPU)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	94.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.8 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	77.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	60038 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	59457 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	58631 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=21)	56535 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	55111 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	54336 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	41942 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)	40586 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	168293 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	164706 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	138528 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=140, last 2 years)	136003 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (92134 - 167815, n=10)	133526 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	133330 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	131984 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	129611 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	43847 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	43525 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (33058 - 45220, n=19)	40637 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40449 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	39852 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	38171 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	34948 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29528 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	19157 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	18417 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13282 - 19663, n=19)	17606 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	16852 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	16584 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15982 Points
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)	12096 Points -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11912 Points -25%

Blender | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * -44%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	16 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=18)	15.3 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	14 Seconds * +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)	14 Seconds * +12%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)	39.2 Seconds * -78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	23 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)	23 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=19)	23 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Leistung)	22 Seconds * -0%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	2688 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	2672 mpaths -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2655 mpaths -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	2632 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2128 - 2843, n=14)	2600 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=129, last 2 years)	2035 mpaths -24%
GPU CUDA
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	1989 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	1988 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	1983 mpaths
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	1945 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1647 - 2098, n=14)	1928 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=132, last 2 years)	1466 mpaths -26%
CPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	19593 mpaths +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	18935 mpaths +26%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	17206 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11906 - 21823, n=14)	17026 mpaths +13%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	15071 mpaths
Average of class Gaming (1690 - 26944, n=144, last 2 years)	13490 mpaths -10%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)	940 mpaths +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	939 mpaths +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	937 mpaths +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	926 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)	923 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (812 - 1036, n=13)	920 mpaths -1%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=188, last 2 years)	603 mpaths -35%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	83 mpaths -91%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	30622 ksamples +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	30614 ksamples +31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)	29548 ksamples +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (19636 - 31653, n=13)	27098 ksamples +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)	25321 ksamples +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	23289 ksamples
Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=188, last 2 years)	19317 ksamples -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	14626 ksamples -37%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	189320 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	177979 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Leistung)	174882 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	173311 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	172437 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (146413 - 189320, n=19)	170499 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	165052 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=233, last 2 years)	121704 Points -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	107088 Points -38%

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	175235 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (153564 - 175235, n=3)	164645 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)	116331 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho nos jogos

O Omen, que é direcionado para jogos de QHD em configurações altas a máximas, também permite resoluções mais altas quando o monitor correspondente é conectado. As taxas de quadros dos jogos que testamos variam abaixo da média de todas as GPUs RTX 4080 que testamos até agora. O perfil de "Performance" leva a um aumento das taxas de quadros que está ligeiramente acima da média. Em alguns jogos, o modo dGPU é capaz de proporcionar um aumento adicional.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	98.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	96.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	93 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	91 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	58.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	178 (151^min) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175 (150^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	174.9 (128^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	172.2 (121^min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (130.4 - 186.1, n=19)	168.1 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	126.2 fps -23%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)	117.4 fps -28%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	146.1 (5.24^min, 100^P1) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.5 (3.79^min, 100^P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (102.9 - 152.7, n=18)	130.3 fps +8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	128.1 (5.93^min, 83.3^P1) fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	125.7 (8.63^min, 83.3^P1) fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.1 (13.2^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)	107.7 fps -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	92.6 (7.62^min, 55.6^P1) fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	168.1 fps +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Leistung)	163.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, Leistung)	163.1 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	162.4 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (129 - 182.1, n=19)	158.8 fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	157.8 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	145.4 fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.3)	113.6 fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)	111.7 fps -23%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	338 (43.6^min, 243^P1) fps +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Leistung)	330 (13.4^min, 237^P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	318 (29.2^min, 228^P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (239 - 357, n=18)	311 fps +13%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistung)	305 (27.1^min, 203^P1) fps +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	276 (60.5^min, 196.3^P1) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	230 (121.4^min, 165.6^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)	207 fps -25%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	180.7 (154.9^min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	179 (152.4^min) fps +15%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	165.9 (140.7^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	165.2 (142.4^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (136.2 - 194.7, n=19)	164.7 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	155.3 (128.4^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)	143.2 fps -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	94 (75.5^min) fps -39%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	138.8 fps +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	131.8 fps +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	130.5 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (95.3 - 141.3, n=20)	123.6 fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	123.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	119.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)	102.3 fps -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	43.3 fps -64%

A fim de avaliar se as taxas de quadros permanecem constantes em grande parte durante um período de tempo mais longo, executamos o jogo "The Witcher 3" por cerca de 60 minutos em resolução Full-HD e ajustes de qualidade máxima. O personagem do jogo não é movido durante este tempo. Não notamos nenhuma queda nas taxas de quadros.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)

Eurocom Nightsky TXi317 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø107.4 (100-116)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)

Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Balanced, Optimus)

Medidas de GPU durante nosso teste Witcher 3 (Performance, dGPU)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	183.8	183.1	175.5	121.1	116
The Witcher 3 (2015)	459.7	400.5	287.8	164
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	206	180.5	167.2	155.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	192.4	173	145.4		117.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	169	146.9	119.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	160	132	129	126	124
Strange Brigade (2018)	388	300	290	276	208
F1 22 (2022)	255	248	231	97.5	67.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	167.6	153.7	148.3	111.5	83.7
Returnal (2023)	150	147	137	121	92
Atomic Heart (2023)	170.8	142.3	121.1	100.3	79.2
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	275	244.6	206.5	205.31	153.8
Sons of the Forest (2023)	78.1	75	74.6	69.7	66.8

Emissões - O laptop HP produz muito ruído

Níveis de ruídos

Na operação diária (Escritório, Internet) e durante a operação ociosa, os ventiladores em funcionamento constante são claramente audíveis. Sob carga pesada (teste de estresse, The Witcher 3), o nível de ruído aumenta ainda mais e volumes de até 50 dB (A) são possíveis. O modo "Desempenho" leva a um aumento mais rápido do nível de ruído até o máximo, permanecendo a esse nível. O ruído consiste em algum assobio acompanhado por um assobio moderado.

A BIOS do Omen contém a opção "Ventilador sempre ligado" da própria HP, que é ativada por padrão. A desativação desta opção não leva a nenhuma mudança em nossa unidade de teste.

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga		45 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		11%	12%	-2%	2%	-2%
off / environment *	24	23 4%	23 4%	24 -0%	25 -4%	25.4 -6%
Idle Minimum *	31	23 26%	23 26%	26 16%	26 16%	28 10%
Idle Average *	32	28.11 12%	23 28%	28 12%	28 12%	28 12%
Idle Maximum *	33	28.11 15%	23.6 28%	34 -3%	30 9%	31.2 5%
Load Average *	45	30.62 32%	39 13%	47 -4%	48 -7%	52.2 -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45	49.75 -11%	51.6 -15%	55 -22%	49 -9%	52.2 -16%
Load Maximum *	50	50.17 -0%	51.3 -3%	56 -12%	52 -4%	52.2 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturas

No funcionamento diário (Escritório, Internet), as temperaturas do estojo permanecem dentro da faixa verde. Sob carga (teste de estresse, The Witcher 3), o laptop aquece visivelmente, mas isto permanece dentro dos limites - pelo menos na parte superior. As temperaturas da CPU não dão motivos para preocupações.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


34 °C	38 °C	37 °C
38 °C	41 °C	39 °C
34 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C


46 °C	51 °C	43 °C
45 °C	45 °C	39 °C
35 °C	35 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 41 °C

alimentação elétrica 36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


24 °C	24 °C	23 °C
24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
23 °C	24 °C	23 °C

Máximo: 24 °C
Médio: 23.7 °C


24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
25 °C	23 °C	23 °C

Máximo: 25 °C
Médio: 23.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 25 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38 °C	40 °C	40 °C
40 °C	42 °C	40 °C
35 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C


57 °C	61 °C	50 °C
52 °C	53 °C	44 °C
39 °C	34 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 46.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-20%	-8%	-28%	-23%	-16%
Maximum Upper Side *	41	53 -29%	40 2%	48 -17%	54 -32%	31.3 24%
Maximum Bottom *	51	56 -10%	37.6 26%	49 4%	55 -8%	43.3 15%
Idle Upper Side *	24	30 -25%	32.4 -35%	40 -67%	29 -21%	31.3 -30%
Idle Bottom *	25	29 -16%	31.4 -26%	33 -32%	33 -32%	43.3 -73%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

Nosso teste de estresse com Prime95 e Furmark funcionando constantemente representa um cenário extremo que usamos para avaliar a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. A CPU (P: 3,8 GHz, E: 3,2 GHz) e a GPU (2 a 2,1 GHz) iniciam o teste com altas velocidades de clock. Depois de pouco tempo, a velocidade da CPU cai para cerca de 1,8 GHz (P núcleos) e 2 GHz (E núcleos), com a velocidade da GPU aumentando para 2,3 - 2,4 GHz ao mesmo tempo.

Oradores

Os alto-falantes estéreos produzem um som decente, mas quase não tem graves.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - laptop para jogos com uma fonte de alimentação de 330 watts

Consumo de energia

O consumo de energia varia em níveis normais para o hardware utilizado. Durante nosso teste Witcher 3 o consumo de energia permanece constante, e durante o teste de estresse o consumo cai após alguns minutos - a CPU é estrangulada. A fonte de alimentação incluída (330 watts) é suficientemente dimensionada.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / Watt
Ocioso	16 / 20 / 26 Watt
Carga	135 / 299 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		18%	-16%	-13%	5%	13%	-5%	9%
Idle Minimum *	16	13 19%	15.2 5%	18 -13%	10 37%	12.2 24%	16.2 ?(8 - 39, n=16) -1%	13.9 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years) 13%
Idle Average *	20	16.5 17%	22.8 -14%	24 -20%	16 20%	18 10%	21.4 ?(9.5 - 44.6, n=16) -7%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	26	17 35%	49.8 -92%	32 -23%	27 -4%	19.4 25%	33.7 ?(20.5 - 68.1, n=16) -30%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average *	135	93 31%	121.2 10%	130 4%	129 4%	128 5%	118.8 ?(77 - 135, n=16) 12%	111.4 ?(32.1 - 202, n=176, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	215	239 -11%	242 -13%	260 -21%	247 -15%	209 3%
Load Maximum *	299	251 16%	273.7 8%	320 -7%	342 -14%	266 11%	293 ?(197.2 - 360, n=16) 2%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=175, last 2 years) 16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø215 (206-224)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (197.1-285)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (17.9-20.9)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (92.1-177.9)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (190.2-205)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198 (185.7-205)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø203 (194.4-211)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.8 (21.1-33.5)

Vida útil da bateria

A vida útil da bateria do Omen não é satisfatória. Mesmo um poderoso laptop para jogos tem que ser capaz de durar mais em operação Optimus com uma bateria de 83-Wh. Não conseguimos determinar até agora se isto se deve a um problema de hardware ou software.

Os arquivos de registro dão uma indicação do problema: durante os testes de baixa carga (WiFi, ocioso, vídeo), a GPU GeForce deve estar inativa e deixar todo o trabalho para a iGPU. No entanto, a GPU GeForce freqüentemente roda em velocidade máxima aqui - com uma carga de 0%. De acordo com a GPU-Z, isto leva a um consumo de energia de até 45 watts.

Por esta razão, pedimos uma nova unidade de teste da HP para verificar isso, mas ainda não recebemos nenhuma. Assim que pudermos obtê-la, testaremos isto novamente.

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 111)		3h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 26min

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		31%	59%	46%	73%	79%	67%
Reader / Idle	249		533 114%	385 55%		532 114%	543 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 118%
H.264	220	294 34%					400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years) 82%
WiFi v1.3	217	290 34%	365 68%	303 40%	583 169%	371 71%	367 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) 69%
Load	86	107 24%	81 -6%	124 44%	65 -24%	131 52%	84.3 ?(36 - 173, n=144, last 2 years) -2%
Gaming						62	62 ?(last 2 years)

Pro

+ Display QHD com 165 Hz

+ optimus avançado

+ memória de trabalho expansível

+ SSD PCIe-4 (espaço para um segundo SSD)

+ iluminação de chave individual

+ Thunderbolt 4 com fornecimento de energia

+ sub-voltagem via software

Contra

- desempenho ligeiramente abaixo da média para um RTX 4080

- alto nível de ruído

- estojo de clattery

- vida útil da bateria

Veredicto - Um sólido laptop de alta tecnologia para jogos

A HP Omen 17-ck2097ng, unidade de teste fornecida pela HP Alemanha.

Com o Omen 17, a HP fornece um poderoso portátil para jogos QHD do segmento high-end. Com seuNúcleo i9-13900HXprocessador e GeForce RTX 4080gPU para laptop, o laptop também deve funcionar bem em outras áreas de aplicação, como processamento e renderização de vídeo. Um rápido PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) fornece o espaço de armazenamento necessário e garante curtos tempos de carga. Há também um espaço para um segundo SSD.

O HP Omen 17 (2023) representa um sólido laptop para jogos, mas não faz pleno uso de seu potencial.

O processador e o núcleo gráfico são capazes de funcionar a velocidades de relógio constantemente altas. O desenvolvimento de ruído e calor está nos níveis altos que são normais para esta classe de laptops. No entanto, o laptop produz muito ruído no funcionamento diário.

O visor mate de 17,3 polegadas (QHD, IPS, 165 Hz, sRGB) deixa uma impressão sólida. Ele tem um desempenho geral ligeiramente melhor do que o painel FHD do painel de construção similar Predecessor de Omenmas pior que a maioria dos concorrentes. Uma conexão Thunderbolt 4 oferece algumas opções de expansão (solução de ancoragem, GPU externo). Além disso, ela também pode ser usada para carregar a bateria com um carregador USB-C (mín. 65 watts, 20 V), e o fornecimento de energia é suportado.

Devido a um possível defeito, somos incapazes de fazer um julgamento final sobre a duração da bateria neste ponto. Iremos medir novamente a vida útil da bateria assim que tivermos uma unidade de reposição da HP. Como a duração da bateria dificilmente tem qualquer impacto na avaliação final de um laptop para jogos, a avaliação mudará, no máximo, apenas ligeiramente.

Como alternativa, você poderia dar uma olhada no Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8Hque é capaz de obter um desempenho superior com a mesma combinação CPU/GPU. Além disso, ele pontua com uma tela mais brilhante no formato 16:10.

Preço e Disponibilidade

O Omen 17 (2023) está disponível na HP a partir de $1499,99. Um modelo similar à nossa configuração testada, exceto por ter um i7-13700, custaria $2.429,99 nos EUA.

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng - 2023-03-28 03/28/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

67 / 80 → 84%

Peso

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Bateria

54 / 95 → 57%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

99%

Desempenho da aplicação

85%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruído

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

79%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

74%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390604 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Revisão HP Omen 17 (2023): O laptop para jogos usa RTX 4080

Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-31 (Update: 2023-03-31)

Revisão HP Omen 17 (2023): O laptop para jogos usa RTX 4080

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Comparação de tamanho

Display - QHD incluindo cobertura sRGB

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Desempenho - O laptop HP oferece hardware poderoso

Condições de teste

Processador

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Desempenho do sistema

Latências DPC

Solução de armazenamento

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Placa Gráfica

Desempenho nos jogos

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Emissões - O laptop HP produz muito ruído

Níveis de ruídos

Temperaturas

Teste de estresse

Oradores

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

Gerenciamento de energia - laptop para jogos com uma fonte de alimentação de 330 watts

Consumo de energia

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption with External Monitor

Vida útil da bateria

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Um sólido laptop de alta tecnologia para jogos

Preço e Disponibilidade

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare