Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Eve V (m3, i5, i7)

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/23/2017

Da multidão para as pessoas. Faz cerca de um ano que o projeto Eve V fez ondas na plataforma de financiamento crowdfunding Indiegogo. O objetivo financeiro foi alcançado em um tempo recorde e, finalmente, ultrapassou por mais de 1800%. Agora chegou a hora dos dispositivos estarem prontos para serem enviados aos adeptos e estarem disponíveis para os compradores interessados. Nós já testamos o dispositivo e estamos comparando os três modelos de CPU disponíveis para o Eve V.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Processador
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 615 - 1024 MB, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 931 MHz, 22.20.16.4815
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
12.3 polegadas , 2880x1920 pixel 281 PPI, Touchscreen, native pen support, Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, IPS LED, IGZO, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Fones, Card Reader: Micro SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall, gravidade, e sensores de luz, giroscópio, acelerômetro
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 296 x 205
Bateria
48 Wh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Webcam frontal e traseira
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4 alto-falantes, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Input pen, keyboard cover, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
Released
11/20/2017
peso
1.36 kg, Suprimento de energia: 220 g
Preço
1199 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
130.7 MB/s ∼100% +87%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼67% +26%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.8 MB/s ∼61% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼56% +4%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
(Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)
69.8 MB/s ∼53%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.5 MB/s ∼19% -65%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼18% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼100% +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼48% +10%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.6 MB/s ∼46% +5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.4 MB/s ∼45% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
(Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)
85.2 MB/s ∼44%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼14% -69%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.2 MB/s ∼13% -70%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
606 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
584 MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼95% -1%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
569 MBit/s ∼94% -3%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼86% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
668 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼96% +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼66% -14%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
246 MBit/s ∼37% -52%
420
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 471 cd/m² Médio: 432.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 471 cd/m²
Contraste: 1472:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | - Ø
92.99% sRGB (Argyll) 70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.2
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, , 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160 x 1440, 12
Response Times
687%
19%
31%
53%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
49.1 (23.1, 26)
42 (20, 22)
14%
4 (2, 2)
92%
33 (15, 18)
33%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
7%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
42%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (18.1, 15.5)
29 (18, 11)
14%
20 (18, 2)
40%
24 (12, 12)
29%
21.6 (9.2, 12.4)
36%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
32%
PWM Frequency
985 (25)
21000
2032%
250 (100)
-75%
2119 (50)
115%
221.2 (49)
-78%
Screen
-4%
94%
-3%
-8%
-36%
Brightness
433
401
-7%
378
-13%
395
-9%
446
3%
344
-21%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
91
7%
88
4%
88
4%
78
-8%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.03
91%
0.45
-41%
0.41
-28%
0.39
-22%
Contrast
1472
1438
-2%
12533
751%
907
-38%
1080
-27%
995
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.63
-65%
4.1
-86%
1.55
30%
2.6
-18%
4.6
-109%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.18
36%
3.64
-7%
1.91
44%
3
12%
6.1
-79%
Gamma
2.2 109%
3.09 78%
2.58 93%
2.34 103%
2.38 101%
2.07 116%
CCT
6270 104%
6767 96%
7113 91%
6491 100%
6780 96%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70
63
-10%
74
6%
61
-13%
62.6
-11%
59
-16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.99
99
6%
93
0%
96
3%
98
5%
91
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
342% / 185%
57% / 73%
14% / 4%
23% / 9%
-19% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.1 ms rise
↘ 15.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.1 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 985 Hz25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 985 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 985 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (7W)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Surface Pro 2017 i5-7300U

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼100% +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼98% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% +13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel Core i7-7Y75
121 Points ∼84% +8%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
116 Points ∼81% +4%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
116 Points ∼81% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼80% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Core i5-7Y54
112 Points ∼78%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
105 Points ∼73% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
Intel Core i5-8250U
534 Points ∼100% +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼63% +51%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼60% +46%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼60% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼60% +45%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
277 Points ∼52% +25%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
250 (min: 227.93) Points ∼47% +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel Core i7-7Y75
236 (min: 227.93) Points ∼44% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼44% +6%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Core i5-7Y54
221 Points ∼41%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
28.54 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
221 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
112 Points
Ajuda

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V m3-7Y30

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i7-7Y75

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (12W)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3999 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3538 Points ∼88% +31%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
3507 Points ∼88% +29%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3289 Points ∼82% +21%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3197 Points ∼80% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼77% +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼73% +8%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
2786 Points ∼70% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
2709 Points ∼68%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
2685 Points ∼67% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2709 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3664 pontos
Ajuda
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
-23%
23%
25%
91%
Write 4K
143.6
121.84
-15%
152
6%
124
-14%
143
0%
Read 4K
26.6
29.53
11%
21
-21%
42
58%
53.38
101%
Write Seq
588.3
275.8
-53%
559
-5%
831
41%
1264
115%
Read Seq
1127
688.43
-39%
1066
-5%
805
-29%
1770
57%
Write 4K Q32T1
170.2
252.28
48%
444
161%
300
76%
471
177%
Read 4K Q32T1
283.1
140.31
-50%
457
61%
322
14%
418.1
48%
Write Seq Q32T1
573.5
359.5
-37%
559
-3%
846
48%
1270
121%
Read Seq Q32T1
1557
769.8
-51%
1404
-10%
1656
6%
3196
105%
AS SSD
-36%
13%
-12733%
123%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.047
-57%
0.028
7%
23
-76567%
0.027
10%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.106
-33%
0.058
27%
0.071
11%
0.041
49%
4K-64 Write
508
264.37
-48%
471
-7%
75
-85%
657.04
29%
4K-64 Read
279
137.19
-51%
500
79%
1221.8
338%
2279.57
717%
4K Write
115
105.61
-8%
130.1
13%
132.2
15%
4K Read
32.3
32.42
0%
33.2
3%
45.24
40%
Seq Write
572
346.7
-39%
539
-6%
156.7
-73%
897.45
57%
Seq Read
1346
704.7
-48%
1208
-10%
1036.8
-23%
2197.21
63%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-30% / -29%
18% / 18%
-6354% / -5443%
107% / 107%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 573.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 283.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 170.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1127 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 588.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 26.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 143.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1709 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1533 Points ∼90% +28%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1528 Points ∼89% +28%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1510 Points ∼88% +26%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
1383.5 (min: 1376) Points ∼81% +16%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
1234 (min: 1228) Points ∼72% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1195 (min: 1195) Points ∼70%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points ∼68% -3%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1150 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
971 Points ∼84% +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
948 Points ∼82% +11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
933 Points ∼81% +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼77% +4%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
875 Points ∼76% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
873 Points ∼76% +2%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
853 Points ∼74%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼63% -15%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
9678 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7776 Points ∼80% +22%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7542 Points ∼78% +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7334 Points ∼76% +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼75% +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
7138 (min: 7124) Points ∼74% +12%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
6387 (min: 6307) Points ∼66% 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6360 Points ∼66%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼64% -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
1319 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4836 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
762 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
292 pontos
Ajuda
Overwatch
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
98 fps ∼100% +347%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
41 (min: 29) fps ∼42% +87%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
30.7 fps ∼31% +40%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
25 fps ∼26% +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
24.1 (min: 16) fps ∼25% +10%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
21.9 fps ∼22%
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
143.4 fps ∼100% +409%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
63.3 (min: 46) fps ∼44% +124%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
53.6 (min: 39) fps ∼37% +90%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
49.6 fps ∼35% +76%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
33.3 fps ∼23% +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
28.2 fps ∼20%
FIFA 18
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
161.4 fps ∼100%
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
135.6 fps ∼100% +200%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
69.5 (min: 59) fps ∼51% +54%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
45.2 fps ∼33%
baixo média alto ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 57.431.8515.714.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 28.221.9fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 45.2fps
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
141 (min: 123) fps ∼100% +900%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
68.9 fps ∼49% +389%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
58.6 (min: 50.3) fps ∼42% +316%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
47.7 fps ∼34% +238%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
23 (min: 21) fps ∼16% +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
19.8 (min: 17) fps ∼14% +40%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
14.1 (min: 12.8) fps ∼10%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
142 (min: 121) fps ∼100% +804%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
78.5 fps ∼55% +400%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
62.3 (min: 53.4) fps ∼44% +297%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
53.1 fps ∼37% +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
29.5 (min: 26) fps ∼21% +88%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
27.6 (min: 25) fps ∼19% +76%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
15.7 (min: 14.6) fps ∼11%
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
149 (min: 128) fps ∼100% +368%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
97 fps ∼65% +205%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
89.8 fps ∼60% +182%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
63.7 (min: 55) fps ∼43% +100%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
58 (min: 48.5) fps ∼39% +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
55 (min: 40) fps ∼37% +73%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
31.85 (min: 27.6) fps ∼21%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
177 (min: 154) fps ∼100% +208%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
125.6 fps ∼71% +119%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
105.9 fps ∼60% +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
92 (min: 75) fps ∼52% +60%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
79.3 (min: 64.1) fps ∼45% +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
68 (min: 58) fps ∼38% +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
57.4 (min: 50.3) fps ∼32%
Carga Máxima
 40.4 °C42.4 °C38.3 °C 
 35.3 °C34.7 °C34.6 °C 
 34.2 °C36.8 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 37.2 °C
39.6 °C42.1 °C41.9 °C
38.1 °C39.4 °C39.7 °C
34.2 °C34.9 °C34.2 °C
Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.236.22532.434313332.54037.235.75033.637.5633330.78031.629.610032.43212528.539.816026.433.220025.840.825024.946.831523.754.54002360.650021.760.763021.163.380020.369.6100019.869.5125019.466.3160019.165.8200018.872.6250018.769.4315018.469.6400018.368.2500018.468.2630018.464.3800018.458.81000018.351.51250018.347.81600018.451SPL31.879.9N1.744.2median 19.4Eve-Tech Eve V i5median 60.7Delta2.610.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.2 / 7.2 / 7.8 Watt
Carga midlight 20.4 / 34.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.3
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
-0%
-4%
-1%
-17%
-42%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
4.3
-2%
4.5
-7%
3.6
14%
3.9
7%
4.6
-10%
4.1
2%
Idle Average *
7.2
7.3
-1%
7.6
-6%
8.1
-13%
9
-25%
11
-53%
9.2
-28%
Idle Maximum *
7.8
7.8
-0%
8.1
-4%
8.7
-12%
11.9
-53%
12
-54%
11.1
-42%
Load Average *
20.4
21.1
-3%
22
-8%
25.5
-25%
27.3
-34%
39.5
-94%
33.8
-66%
Load Maximum *
34.6
33.2
4%
33.1
4%
23.5
32%
27.9
19%
34.6
-0%
49.2
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 28min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 34min
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-14%
25%
-16%
-42%
-28%
-25%
-5%
Reader / Idle
988
1054
7%
1031
4%
512
-48%
833
-16%
662
-33%
H.264
634
607
-4%
563
-11%
409
-35%
377
-41%
614
-3%
WiFi v1.3
523
435
-17%
744
42%
337
-36%
378
-28%
441
-16%
489
-7%
Load
168
162
138
134
112
Witcher 3 ultra
115

Pro

+ Carcaça monobloco de alta qualidade, construção robusta
+ Sensação confortável do tablet e do teclado
+ Thunderbolt 3 e Type-C Gen. 1 porta
+ Bom desempenho do WiFi
+ Pacote completo com base de teclado e caneta incluída no preço
+ Teclado também adequado para escrever extensamente
+ Tela com muito bom brilho e contraste
+ Reprodução precisa das cores já no estado de entrega
+ O uso da eGPU é possível
+ Operação silenciosa
+ Aquecimento moderado
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Preço atraente

Contra

- Bastante pesado comparativamente
- Cabo de carregamento Type-C incluído
- A resistência à poeira do teclado é questionável
- O desempenho da versão m3 é inconsistente com nossas expectativas
- Ganhos adicionais da eGPU são muito limitados pela CPU
- Qualidade medíocre do áudio dos alto-falantes integrados
In Review: Eve V
In Review: Eve V

E aqui está, o novo conversível do povo, o Eve V! Aqui está um resumo do nosso teste:

Em termos da carcaça, o Eve V prova ser um vencedor. O monobloco de alumínio e o teclado Alcantara têm uma sensação de alta qualidade, não apresentam fraquezas na construção e parecem muito robustos. Com quase 1,4 kg (~3,1lb), o aparelho não é realmente mais leve que os Ultrabooks atuais. No entanto, esse é o único ponto verdadeiramente negativo em nossa avaliação. A boa conectividade, por outro lado, é definitivamente positiva. Com duas conexões USB 3.0 tipo A e duas do tipo C, uma das quais é uma porta Thunderbolt 3 completa, você está bem equipado qualquer eventualidade. Também gostamos do teclado, e é bastante adequado para extensas tarefas de escrita. Nossas experiências com a entrada da caneta N-Trig incluída, foram satisfatórias, e é louvável oferecer apenas pacotes com teclado e caneta, como a Eve-Tech faz. Desta forma, você pode evitar "surpreender" o usuário com custos ocultos.
A tela oferece uma luminosidade e contraste muito bons. Como vem na caixa, o Eve V vem com uma tela calibrada e cores relativamente precisas. A resolução de 3K fornece alta nitidez da imagem, mas pode reultar em problemas com alguns aplicativos individuais devido à escala necessária do Windows.

O Eve V é um dispositivo atraente, mas não deve ser superestimado.

Agora, enquanto as reservas de desempenho do Eve V: Para este projeto, foram selecionados os processadores da série Y da Intel. Estes são chips passivamente resfriados com um TDP de 4,5 watts. Mesmo que o i5-7300U no Surface Pro possa oferecer brevemente um desempenho muito maior, durante cargas prolongadas, ele se nivelará no nível do modelo i5-7Y54 que estamos testando aqui. Todos os modelos de CPU testados (m3, i5, i7) demonstram um desempenho quase estável durante a carga constante. No entanto, era curioso que o modelo m3 que tínhamos aqui fosse muito melhor em muitos testes do que as versões i5 e i7 muito mais caras. O Eve V é um bom dispositivo para as tarefas básicas do escritório, também considerando a longa duração da bateria que pode ser alcançada. Para criadores de conteúdo, a CPU do dispositivo pode rapidamente se tornar um gargalo para software complexo.

O Eve V está disponível a partir de apenas 799 Euros (~$942; $799 nos EUA). No entanto, além da CPU m3, você só recebe 128 GB de armazenamento, o que pode ser um obstáculo para a maioria dos usuários. O próximo passo é o modelo i5 com 256 GB de armazenamento, que já custa 1199 Euros ou $1412. Um acréscimo de 400 euros ($471) por uma CPU que dificilmente mostra quaisquer vantagens e 128 GB de armazenamento adicional é bastante. Continua assim: i5, 16 GB de RAM e 512 GB de armazenamento custa $1499 ou 1549 Euros, o i7 começa em $1599 ou 1649 Euros e o modelo principal com i7, 16 GB de RAM e SSD de 1 TB (Samsung PM961) custa altos 1999 Euros (~$2358; $1999 nos EUA) ..

Em comparação com a concorrência, como a Surface Pro da Microsoft, o Eve V atinge uma boa figura em termos de preço (Surface Pro i5-7300U, SSD de 256 GB, 8 GB: 1149 Euros/~$1353, + Type over 179 Euros/~$210, + Caneta Surface 109 Euros/~$ 128), especialmente porque o teclado e a caneta estão incluídos no pacote. Mas, considerando as diferenças de preços entre os modelos, achamos os preços premium para outros modelos seguindo o estilo da Microsoft, muito altos, especialmente porque as diferenças entre os processadores usados são apenas mínimas. 

O Eve V já foi enviada aos seus financiadores e deve chegar em breve. Outros compradores interessados podem começar a comprar online desde o dia 4 de dezembro.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 - 11/19/2017 v6
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 79%
Peso
71 / 78 → 83%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 81%
Desempenho da aplicação
71 / 87 → 82%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
97%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
58 / 85 → 69%
Médio
78%
86%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Eve V (m3, i5, i7)
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, 2017-11-23 (Update: 2017-11-28)