Breve Análise do Conversível Eve V (m3, i5, i7)

Name: Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Brand: Eve-Tech

Da multidão para as pessoas. Faz cerca de um ano que o projeto Eve V fez ondas na plataforma de financiamento crowdfunding Indiegogo. O objetivo financeiro foi alcançado em um tempo recorde e, finalmente, ultrapassou por mais de 1800%. Agora chegou a hora dos dispositivos estarem prontos para serem enviados aos adeptos e estarem disponíveis para os compradores interessados. Nós já testamos o dispositivo e estamos comparando os três modelos de CPU disponíveis para o Eve V.

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Tablet Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Eve-Tech Eve V i5

Processador

Intel Core i5-7Y54 2 x 1.2 - 3.2 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 615 - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 931 MHz, 22.20.16.4815

Memória

8 GB

, LPDDR3

Pantalha

12.30 polegadas, 2880 x 1920 pixel 281 PPI, Touchscreen, native pen support, Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, IPS LED, IGZO, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Fones, Card Reader: Micro SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Hall, gravidade, e sensores de luz, giroscópio, acelerômetro

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 296 x 205

Bateria

48 Wh

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Webcam frontal e traseira
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 4 alto-falantes, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Input pen, keyboard cover, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

Released

11/20/2017

peso

1.36 kg, Suprimento de energia: 220 g

Preço

1199 Euro

Links

Eve-Tech página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Huawei MateBook X DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	130.7 MB/s +87%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s +26%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.8 MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	72.6 MB/s +4%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 (Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)	69.8 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.5 MB/s -65%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	194 MB/s +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	93.8 MB/s +10%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.6 MB/s +5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	87.4 MB/s +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 (Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)	85.2 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.6 MB/s -69%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.2 MB/s -70%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	668 MBit/s +30%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	644 MBit/s +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	618 MBit/s +21%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	440 MBit/s -14%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	246 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	606 MBit/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	586 MBit/s 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	584 MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	577 MBit/s -1%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	569 MBit/s -3%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	520 MBit/s -11%


420 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	431 cd/m²
453 cd/m²	471 cd/m²	458 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	422 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 471 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 432.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 471 cd/m²
Contraste: 1472:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, , 2880x1920, 12.30	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.30	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12.00	Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.30	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.30	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display		-1%	8%	-4%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	68.2	67.6 -1%	77.3 13%	65.8 -4%	66.7 -2%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	99 -1%	92.8 -7%	96.2 -4%	98 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70	69.1 -1%	83.1 19%	66.8 -5%	68.7 -2%
Response Times		687%	19%	31%	53%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	49.1 ?(23.1, 26)	42 ?(20, 22) 14%	4 ?(2, 2) 92%	33 ?(15, 18) 33%	45.6 ?(23.6, 22) 7%	28.4 ?(15.2, 13.2) 42%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(18.1, 15.5)	29 ?(18, 11) 14%	20 ?(18, 2) 40%	24 ?(12, 12) 29%	21.6 ?(9.2, 12.4) 36%	22.8 ?(13.6, 9.2) 32%
PWM Frequency	985 ?(25)	21000 2032%	250 ?(100) -75%		2119 ?(50) 115%	221.2 ?(49) -78%
Screen		-6%	71%	3%	-4%	-37%
Brightness middle	471	417 -11%	376 -20%	408 -13%	443 -6%	388.1 -18%
Brightness	433	401 -7%	378 -13%	395 -9%	446 3%	344 -21%
Brightness Distribution	85	88 4%	91 7%	88 4%	88 4%	78 -8%
Black Level *	0.32	0.29 9%	0.03 91%	0.45 -41%	0.41 -28%	0.39 -22%
Contrast	1472	1438 -2%	12533 751%	907 -38%	1080 -27%	995 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	3.63 -65%	4.1 -86%	1.55 30%	2.6 -18%	4.6 -109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.6	6.74 -20%	6.45 -15%	2.19 61%	4 29%	9.1 -63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	2.18 36%	3.64 -7%	1.91 44%	3 12%	6.1 -79%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	3.09 ^71%	2.58 ^85%	2.34 ^94%	2.38 ^92%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	6270 ^104%	6767 ^96%	7113 ^91%	6491 ^100%	6780 ^96%	7104 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	70	63 -10%	74 6%	61 -13%	62.6 -11%	59 -16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92.99	99 6%	93 0%	96 3%	98 5%	91 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		227% / 125%	33% / 50%	10% / 5%	16% / 7%	-19% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.1 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.1 ms rise
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

985 Hz

≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 985 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 985 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (7W)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Surface Pro 2017 i5-7300U

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel Core i5-7300U	141 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel Core i5-7200U	127 Points +13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Core i5-7200U	127 Points +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel Core i7-7Y75	121 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Core i5-7200U	116 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) Intel Core i5-5350U	116 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Core i5-7Y54	115 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Core i5-7Y54	112 Points
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	105 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	534 Points +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel Core i5-7300U	334 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Core i5-7200U	322 Points +46%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Core i5-7200U	322 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) Intel Core i5-5350U	277 Points +25%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	250 (227.93^min - 249.83^max) Points +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel Core i7-7Y75	236 (227.93^min - 235.62^max) Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Core i5-7Y54	234 Points +6%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Core i5-7Y54	221 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

28.54 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

221 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

112 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V m3-7Y30

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i7-7Y75

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (12W)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3999 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3538 Points +31%
Huawei MateBook X HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256	3507 Points +29%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3289 Points +21%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3197 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3092 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M	2936 Points +8%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	2786 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	2709 Points
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7	2685 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2709 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3664 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		2556 pontos
Ajuda

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-23%	23%	25%	91%
Write Seq	588	275.8 -53%	559 -5%	831 41%	1264 115%
Read Seq	1127	688 -39%	1066 -5%	805 -29%	1770 57%
Write 4K	143.6	121.8 -15%	152 6%	124 -14%	143 0%
Read 4K	26.6	29.53 11%	21 -21%	42 58%	53.4 101%
Write 4K Q32T1	170.2	252.3 48%	444 161%	300 76%	471 177%
Read 4K Q32T1	283.1	140.3 -50%	457 61%	322 14%	418.1 48%
Write Seq Q32T1	574	359.5 -37%	559 -3%	846 47%	1270 121%
Read Seq Q32T1	1557	770 -51%	1404 -10%	1656 6%	3196 105%
AS SSD		-36%	13%	-12733%	123%
4K Write	115	105.6 -8%	130.1 13%		132.2 15%
4K Read	32.3	32.42 0%	33.2 3%		45.24 40%
Seq Write	572	346.7 -39%	539 -6%	156.7 -73%	897 57%
Seq Read	1346	705 -48%	1208 -10%	1037 -23%	2197 63%
4K-64 Write	508	264.4 -48%	471 -7%	75 -85%	657 29%
4K-64 Read	279	137.2 -51%	500 79%	1222 338%	2280 717%
Access Time Write *	0.03	0.047 -57%	0.028 7%	23 -76567%	0.027 10%
Access Time Read *	0.08	0.106 -33%	0.058 27%	0.071 11%	0.041 49%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-30% / -29%	18% / 18%	-6354% / -5443%	107% / 107%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 574 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 283.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 170.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1127 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 588 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 26.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 143.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1709 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1533 Points +28%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1528 Points +28%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1510 Points +26%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	1384 (1376^min - 1390^max) Points +16%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	1234 (1228^min - 1268^max) Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1195 (1195^min - 1239^max) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1161 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	9678 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7776 Points +22%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7542 Points +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7334 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U	7265 Points +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	7138 (7124^min - 7152^max) Points +12%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	6387 (6307^min - 6467^max) Points 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	6360 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	6164 Points -3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1150 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	971 Points +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	948 Points +11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	933 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U	889 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	875 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	873 Points +2%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	853 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	728 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		1319 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4836 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		762 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		292 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Overwatch | FIFA 18

Overwatch
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	141.8 fps +403%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	63.3 (46^min - 81^max) fps +124%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	53.6 (39^min - 70^max) fps +90%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	49.6 fps +76%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	33.3 fps +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	28.2 fps
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	97.2 fps +344%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	41 (29^min - 50^max) fps +87%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	30.7 fps +40%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	25 fps +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	24.1 (16^min - 35^max) fps +10%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	21.9 fps

FIFA 18
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	135.6 fps +200%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	69.5 (59^min - 78^max) fps +54%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	45.2 fps
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	161.4 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	57.4	31.85	15.7	14.1
Overwatch (2016)	28.2	21.9
FIFA 18 (2017)	45.2
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	8.6
ELEX (2017)	8.8

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	177 (154^min) fps +208%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	125.6 fps +119%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	105.9 fps +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	92 (75^min) fps +60%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	79.3 (64.1^min) fps +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	68 (58^min) fps +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	57.4 (50.3^min) fps
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	149 (128^min) fps +368%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	97 fps +205%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	89.8 fps +182%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	63.7 (55^min) fps +100%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	58 (48.5^min) fps +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	55 (40^min) fps +73%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	31.85 (27.6^min) fps
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	142 (121^min) fps +804%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	78.5 fps +400%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	62.3 (53.4^min) fps +297%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	53.1 fps +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	29.5 (26^min) fps +88%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	27.6 (25^min) fps +76%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	15.7 (14.6^min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	141 (123^min) fps +900%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	68.9 fps +389%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	58.6 (50.3^min) fps +316%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	47.7 fps +238%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	23 (21^min) fps +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	19.8 (17^min) fps +40%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	14.1 (12.8^min) fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.4 °C	42.4 °C	38.3 °C
35.3 °C	34.7 °C	34.6 °C
34.2 °C	36.8 °C	37.9 °C

Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 37.2 °C


39.6 °C	42.1 °C	41.9 °C
38.1 °C	39.4 °C	39.7 °C
34.2 °C	34.9 °C	34.2 °C

Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.8 °C / -17.6 F).

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.9 Watt
Ocioso	4.2 / 7.2 / 7.8 Watt
Carga	20.4 / 34.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.30	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.30	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.30	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.00	Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.30	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.30
Power Consumption		-0%	-4%	-1%	-17%	-42%	-35%
Idle Minimum *	4.2	4.3 -2%	4.5 -7%	3.6 14%	3.9 7%	4.6 -10%	4.1 2%
Idle Average *	7.2	7.3 -1%	7.6 -6%	8.1 -13%	9 -25%	11 -53%	9.2 -28%
Idle Maximum *	7.8	7.8 -0%	8.1 -4%	8.7 -12%	11.9 -53%	12 -54%	11.1 -42%
Load Average *	20.4	21.1 -3%	22 -8%	25.5 -25%	27.3 -34%	39.5 -94%	33.8 -66%
Load Maximum *	34.6	33.2 4%	33.1 4%	23.5 32%	27.9 19%	34.6 -0%	49.2 -42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 34min

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh	Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		-4%	-14%	25%	-16%	-42%	-28%	-25%	-5%
Reader / Idle	988			1054 7%	1031 4%	512 -48%	833 -16%	662 -33%
H.264	634	607 -4%	563 -11%		409 -35%		377 -41%		614 -3%
WiFi v1.3	523		435 -17%	744 42%		337 -36%	378 -28%	441 -16%	489 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra			194						115
Load			174	168		162	138	134	112

Pro

+ Carcaça monobloco de alta qualidade, construção robusta

+ Sensação confortável do tablet e do teclado

+ Thunderbolt 3 e Type-C Gen. 1 porta

+ Bom desempenho do WiFi

+ Pacote completo com base de teclado e caneta incluída no preço

+ Teclado também adequado para escrever extensamente

+ Tela com muito bom brilho e contraste

+ Reprodução precisa das cores já no estado de entrega

+ O uso da eGPU é possível

+ Operação silenciosa

+ Aquecimento moderado

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Preço atraente

Contra

- Bastante pesado comparativamente

- Cabo de carregamento Type-C incluído

- A resistência à poeira do teclado é questionável

- O desempenho da versão m3 é inconsistente com nossas expectativas

- Ganhos adicionais da eGPU são muito limitados pela CPU

- Qualidade medíocre do áudio dos alto-falantes integrados

E aqui está, o novo conversível do povo, o Eve V! Aqui está um resumo do nosso teste:

Em termos da carcaça, o Eve V prova ser um vencedor. O monobloco de alumínio e o teclado Alcantara têm uma sensação de alta qualidade, não apresentam fraquezas na construção e parecem muito robustos. Com quase 1,4 kg (~3,1lb), o aparelho não é realmente mais leve que os Ultrabooks atuais. No entanto, esse é o único ponto verdadeiramente negativo em nossa avaliação. A boa conectividade, por outro lado, é definitivamente positiva. Com duas conexões USB 3.0 tipo A e duas do tipo C, uma das quais é uma porta Thunderbolt 3 completa, você está bem equipado qualquer eventualidade. Também gostamos do teclado, e é bastante adequado para extensas tarefas de escrita. Nossas experiências com a entrada da caneta N-Trig incluída, foram satisfatórias, e é louvável oferecer apenas pacotes com teclado e caneta, como a Eve-Tech faz. Desta forma, você pode evitar "surpreender" o usuário com custos ocultos.
A tela oferece uma luminosidade e contraste muito bons. Como vem na caixa, o Eve V vem com uma tela calibrada e cores relativamente precisas. A resolução de 3K fornece alta nitidez da imagem, mas pode reultar em problemas com alguns aplicativos individuais devido à escala necessária do Windows.

O Eve V é um dispositivo atraente, mas não deve ser superestimado.

Agora, enquanto as reservas de desempenho do Eve V: Para este projeto, foram selecionados os processadores da série Y da Intel. Estes são chips passivamente resfriados com um TDP de 4,5 watts. Mesmo que o i5-7300U no Surface Pro possa oferecer brevemente um desempenho muito maior, durante cargas prolongadas, ele se nivelará no nível do modelo i5-7Y54 que estamos testando aqui. Todos os modelos de CPU testados (m3, i5, i7) demonstram um desempenho quase estável durante a carga constante. No entanto, era curioso que o modelo m3 que tínhamos aqui fosse muito melhor em muitos testes do que as versões i5 e i7 muito mais caras. O Eve V é um bom dispositivo para as tarefas básicas do escritório, também considerando a longa duração da bateria que pode ser alcançada. Para criadores de conteúdo, a CPU do dispositivo pode rapidamente se tornar um gargalo para software complexo.

O Eve V está disponível a partir de apenas 799 Euros (~$942; $799 nos EUA). No entanto, além da CPU m3, você só recebe 128 GB de armazenamento, o que pode ser um obstáculo para a maioria dos usuários. O próximo passo é o modelo i5 com 256 GB de armazenamento, que já custa 1199 Euros ou $1412. Um acréscimo de 400 euros ($471) por uma CPU que dificilmente mostra quaisquer vantagens e 128 GB de armazenamento adicional é bastante. Continua assim: i5, 16 GB de RAM e 512 GB de armazenamento custa $1499 ou 1549 Euros, o i7 começa em $1599 ou 1649 Euros e o modelo principal com i7, 16 GB de RAM e SSD de 1 TB (Samsung PM961) custa altos 1999 Euros (~$2358; $1999 nos EUA) ..

Em comparação com a concorrência, como a Surface Pro da Microsoft, o Eve V atinge uma boa figura em termos de preço (Surface Pro i5-7300U, SSD de 256 GB, 8 GB: 1149 Euros/~$1353, + Type over 179 Euros/~$210, + Caneta Surface 109 Euros/~$ 128), especialmente porque o teclado e a caneta estão incluídos no pacote. Mas, considerando as diferenças de preços entre os modelos, achamos os preços premium para outros modelos seguindo o estilo da Microsoft, muito altos, especialmente porque as diferenças entre os processadores usados são apenas mínimas.

O Eve V já foi enviada aos seus financiadores e deve chegar em breve. Outros compradores interessados podem começar a comprar online desde o dia 4 de dezembro.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 - 2017-11-19 11/19/2017 v6^(old)
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum

Acabamento

90 / 98 → 91%

Teclado

89%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

63 / 80 → 79%

Peso

71 / 35-78 → 83%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

55 / 68 → 81%

Desempenho da aplicação

71 / 87 → 82%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

97%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

58 / 85 → 69%

Médio

78%

86%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Eve V (m3, i5, i7)

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, 2017-11-23 (Update: 2017-11-28)