Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F: Parece um Ultrabook, joga como um Gamer

Name: Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Brand: Asus

Ultrabook-gaming hybrid. O Zenbook 15 é um dos poucos portáteis equipados com uma CPU Intel U-series e uma GPU GTX 1650 Max-Q para um nível impressionante de desempenho em jogos em relação ao tamanho compacto do chassi. Ele atinge um excelente equilíbrio entre a portabilidade e as longas duraçõe de um Ultrabook tradicional, oferecendo ao mesmo tempo potencia de GPU suficiente para rodar os jogos mais recentes em 1080p. O ScreenPad 2.0 parece mais nítido e suave do que antes, mas o preço associado a ele continua sendo uma venda difícil.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/02/2019

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of Xotic PC

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD ❌

Right: SD reader, USB Type-C 3.1 Gen. 2, USB Type-A 3.1 Gen. 2, HDMI, AC adapter

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	172.4 MB/s ∼100% +149%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	149.3 MB/s ∼87% +116%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	69.2 MB/s ∼40%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	193.8 MB/s ∼100% +136%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192.1 MB/s ∼99% +134%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82.2 MB/s ∼42%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	696 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	674 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Wireless-AC 9560	649 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	616 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	596 (521^min - 646^max) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Wireless-AC 9560	659 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	650 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	644 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	633 (482^min - 722^max) MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	621 MBit/s ∼94%


291.7 cd/m²	306.4 cd/m²	303.4 cd/m²
276.1 cd/m²	312.6 cd/m²	286.7 cd/m²
266.3 cd/m²	298.4 cd/m²	271.2 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE NV156FHM-N63

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 312.6 cd/m² Médio: 290.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1008:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 3.78
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
87.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160	Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB BOE HF NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
Response Times		94%	-16%	21%	69%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.2 (22, 19.2)	2.3 (1.1, 1.2) 94%	57 (26, 31) -38%	34 (16, 18) 17%	13.6 (7.2, 6.4) 67%	43.2 (20.4, 22.8) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	33.2 (19.6, 13.6)	2.4 (1.1, 1.3) 93%	31 (16, 15) 7%	25 (14, 11) 25%	10 (6, 4) 70%	31.2 (16.4, 14.8) 6%
PWM Frequency		59.52 (100)		961 (90)	200 (99)	117000 (75, 150)
Screen		19%	11%	5%	12%	47%
Brightness middle	312.6	421.2 35%	330 6%	309 -1%	312.7 0%	520 66%
Brightness	290	417 44%	310 7%	299 3%	305 5%	492 70%
Brightness Distribution	85	94 11%	87 2%	84 -1%	90 6%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.31		0.37 -19%	0.29 6%	0.27 13%	0.39 -26%
Contrast	1008		892 -12%	1066 6%	1158 15%	1333 32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.78	6.06 -5%	4.03 30%	3.9 33%	4.57 21%	1.2 79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.86	11.89 -34%	6.74 24%	7.5 15%	6.81 23%	2.3 74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	3.78		1.96 48%		2.91 23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.4	2.8 48%	4.49 17%	4.58 15%	4.3 20%	1.3 76%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.15 ^102%	2.57 ^86%	2.43 ^91%	2.29 ^96%	2.18 ^101%
CCT	7864 ^83%	6235 ^104%	6744 ^96%	7344 ^89%	7098 ^92%	6738 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57.1	81 42%	61 7%	39 -32%	59.4 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87.4	99.6 14%	94 8%	90 3%	91.3 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		57% / 34%	-3% / 7%	13% / 7%	41% / 21%	24% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø669 (651.9-718.51)

Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø570 (535-723)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø658 (642.69-661.47)

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	181 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel Core i7-9750H	179 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138 - 193, n=51)	173 Points ∼75% -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U	172 Points ∼75% -5%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points ∼74% -6%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T Intel Core i5-8265U	155 Points ∼67% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	150 Points ∼65% -17%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points ∼63% -19%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points ∼63% -20%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	142.24 Points ∼62% -21%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T Intel Core i7-7500U	141 Points ∼61% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel Core i7-9750H	1166 Points ∼27% +71%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points ∼18% +18%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U	730 Points ∼17% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U	729 Points ∼17% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE Intel Core i5-9300H	717 Points ∼16% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	683 Points ∼16%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T Intel Core i5-8265U	666 Points ∼15% -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	661 Points ∼15% -3%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	651.58 Points ∼15% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52)	612 Points ∼14% -10%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T Intel Core i7-7500U	307 Points ∼7% -55%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

181 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

683 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107.11 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6880 Points ∼53% +47%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	6110 Points ∼47% +31%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4884 Points ∼38% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (4680 - 4947, n=3)	4848 Points ∼37% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4680 Points ∼36%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4473 Points ∼35% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	4042 Points ∼31% -14%
Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	7569 Points ∼73% +5%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7494 Points ∼72% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7485 Points ∼72% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7201 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (7175 - 7201, n=3)	7184 Points ∼69% 0%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	6722 Points ∼65% -7%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	6678 Points ∼64% -7%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9701 Points ∼85% +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9524 Points ∼83% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9067 Points ∼79%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	8894 Points ∼78% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (8709 - 9067, n=3)	8852 Points ∼77% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	8258 Points ∼72% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	8237 Points ∼72% -9%
Score
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5654 Points ∼70% +17%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5469 Points ∼67% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (4828 - 4851, n=3)	4842 Points ∼60% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4828 Points ∼60%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4805 Points ∼59% 0%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4636 Points ∼57% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	4347 Points ∼54% -10%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5279 Points ∼77% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (5132 - 5145, n=2)	5139 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5132 Points ∼75%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4762 Points ∼70% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4575 Points ∼67% -11%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	4382 Points ∼64% -15%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4316 Points ∼63% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4157 Points ∼68% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3799 Points ∼62% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3764 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (3758 - 3764, n=2)	3761 Points ∼62% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	3735 Points ∼61% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3505 Points ∼58% -7%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	3494 Points ∼57% -7%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3764 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5132 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD		18%	-43%	-25%	7%	-14%
Copy Game MB/s	1287.32	1823.85 42%	700.4 -46%	574.39 -55%	1676.98 30%	1149.77 -11%
Copy Program MB/s	468.05	983.98 110%	328.55 -30%	390 -17%	874.26 87%	513.29 10%
Copy ISO MB/s	1375.25	3182.39 131%	1651.54 20%	1640.9 19%	2111.62 54%	1539.06 12%
Score Total	3483	3638 4%	2684 -23%	1951 -44%	3970 14%	3177 -9%
Score Write	1664	1693 2%	1127 -32%	677 -59%	2034 22%	1450 -13%
Score Read	1210	1294 7%	1071 -11%	884 -27%	1278 6%	1152 -5%
Access Time Write *	0.075	0.039 48%	0.057 24%	0.051 32%	0.118 -57%	0.104 -39%
Access Time Read *	0.034	0.05 -47%	0.147 -332%	0.044 -29%	0.041 -21%	0.063 -85%
4K-64 Write	1374.95	1456.13 6%	956.6 -30%	486.04 -65%	1809.77 32%	1212.2 -12%
4K-64 Read	969.22	1077.98 11%	845.02 -13%	623.05 -36%	1092.42 13%	917.46 -5%
4K Write	146.01	98.3 -33%	92.75 -36%	123.04 -16%	93.04 -36%	105.96 -27%
4K Read	52.32	43.25 -17%	24.62 -53%	44.74 -14%	44.99 -14%	51.32 -2%
Seq Write	1432.22	1386.27 -3%	773.05 -46%	679.56 -53%	1316.23 -8%	1315.15 -8%
Seq Read	1886.9	1723.09 -9%	2017.79 7%	2158.18 14%	1408.99 -25%	1828.99 -3%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3464 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2393 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 391.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 458.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2272 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1975 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.28 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 141.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6419 Points ∼34% +126%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	5913 Points ∼31% +108%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5335 Points ∼28% +88%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	4708 Points ∼25% +66%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points ∼19% +28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3510 Points ∼19% +24%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	3492 Points ∼19% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (2836 - 3238, n=10)	2998 Points ∼16% +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	2836 Points ∼15%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2536 Points ∼13% -11%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U	1416 Points ∼8% -50%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	1138 Points ∼6% -60%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	1000 Points ∼5% -65%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	862 Points ∼5% -70%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	16483 Points ∼38% +117%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	15696 Points ∼36% +107%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14753 Points ∼34% +94%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	14724 Points ∼34% +94%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points ∼26% +49%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9423 Points ∼22% +24%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	9195 Points ∼21% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (6985 - 8618, n=11)	7804 Points ∼18% +3%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	7791 Points ∼18% +3%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	7593 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U	5965 Points ∼14% -21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points ∼10% -46%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3321 Points ∼8% -56%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	2874 Points ∼7% -62%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	106563 Points ∼55% +128%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	101481 Points ∼52% +117%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	101453 Points ∼52% +117%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	98452 Points ∼50% +111%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	80615 Points ∼41% +73%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	61286 Points ∼31% +31%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	50549 Points ∼26% +8%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	49314 Points ∼25% +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	46686 Points ∼24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (21759 - 53981, n=11)	40411 Points ∼21% -13%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U	26144 Points ∼13% -44%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	25986 Points ∼13% -44%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	20961 Points ∼11% -55%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	18633 Points ∼10% -60%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12458 Points ∼55% +45%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12260 Points ∼54% +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	12069 Points ∼53% +41%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	11707 Points ∼52% +37%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	11416 Points ∼50% +33%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9140 Points ∼40% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (6409 - 10846, n=12)	8629 Points ∼38% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	8563 Points ∼38%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	8540 Points ∼38% 0%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points ∼30% -20%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points ∼20% -48%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U	4446 Points ∼20% -48%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4097 Points ∼18% -52%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3707 Points ∼16% -57%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	20765 Points ∼35% +93%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19329 Points ∼33% +80%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	19187 Points ∼33% +78%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	18434 Points ∼31% +71%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13759 Points ∼23% +28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	13138 Points ∼22% +22%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points ∼21% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (10248 - 12259, n=13)	11195 Points ∼19% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U	10761 Points ∼18%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	9466 Points ∼16% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U	6935 Points ∼12% -36%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points ∼8% -55%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4274 Points ∼7% -60%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3560 Points ∼6% -67%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		10217 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21547 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6698 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		2949 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	83 fps ∼100% +144%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	71 fps ∼86% +109%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	67 fps ∼81% +97%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	61 fps ∼73% +79%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	49 fps ∼59% +44%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	44 fps ∼53% +29%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	43 fps ∼52% +26%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	34 fps ∼41% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	34 fps ∼41%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	31 fps ∼37% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X	23 (17^min - 39^max) fps ∼28% -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	23 fps ∼28% -32%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	132 fps ∼100% +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	130 fps ∼98% +41%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	128 fps ∼97% +39%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	115 fps ∼87% +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	114 fps ∼86% +24%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	111 fps ∼84% +21%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	111 fps ∼84% +21%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	92 fps ∼70%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X	81 (60^min - 147^max) fps ∼61% -12%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	63 fps ∼48% -32%
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	62 fps ∼47% -33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	54 fps ∼41% -41%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	24 fps ∼18% -74%

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø48.5 (45-52)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	259.1	196.1	172.2	72	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)	156.1	93.6	54.3	30.7	fps
Rocket League (2017)	216.1	138.1	97.8		fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	92	48	39	34	fps

	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Noise		-10%	-6%	-13%	-9%	-5%
off / environment *	28.4	28.2 1%	28.4 -0%	28.5 -0%	30.4 -7%	30.5 -7%
Idle Minimum *	28.4	28.2 1%	29 -2%	30.3 -7%	30.4 -7%	30.5 -7%
Idle Average *	28.4	28.2 1%	29 -2%	30.5 -7%	30.4 -7%	30.5 -7%
Idle Maximum *	28.4	30.4 -7%	29 -2%	30.5 -7%	31.6 -11%	30.5 -7%
Load Average *	33.9	43.8 -29%	35.4 -4%	41 -21%	43.2 -27%	37.5 -11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	39.8	47.2 -19%	42 -6%	48 -21%
Load Maximum *	40.2	47.2 -17%	50 -24%	51.9 -29%	38.3 5%	37.5 7%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Carga		33.9 / 40.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45.4 °C	44.8 °C	37 °C
39 °C	44.6 °C	35 °C
35 °C	31.8 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C


43 °C	51.6 °C	48 °C
38 °C	42.4 °C	44.6 °C
34.2 °C	36.6 °C	37.4 °C

Máximo: 51.6 °C
Médio: 41.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


32.8 °C	35.4 °C	31.4 °C
31.4 °C	33 °C	31.4 °C
30 °C	29.6 °C	29.6 °C

Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


33.2 °C	40 °C	34.4 °C
32.8 °C	33 °C	33.8 °C
31.2 °C	31.4 °C	31.6 °C

Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C

Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


42.4 °C	39 °C	34 °C
36.4 °C	40.6 °C	31.4 °C
31.6 °C	28.4 °C	28.6 °C

Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


38.6 °C	48.4 °C	45 °C
34.6 °C	38.4 °C	41.8 °C
31.4 °C	33.4 °C	34.6 °C

Máximo: 48.4 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 9.2 Watt
Ocioso	5 / 13.2 / 24 Watt
Carga	70 / 114 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4	Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption		-16%	-108%	-117%	19%	27%	27%
Idle Minimum *	5	6.2 -24%	19.3 -286%	18.7 -274%	3.4 32%	4.8 4%	2.1 58%
Idle Average *	13.2	9.6 27%	24.2 -83%	30.7 -133%	11 17%	10.1 23%	6.7 49%
Idle Maximum *	24	21.2 12%	24.5 -2%	33.9 -41%	14.9 38%	10.7 55%	11.4 52%
Load Average *	70	104.3 -49%	122.3 -75%	93.4 -33%	78.9 -13%	44 37%	77.7 -11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	63.3	91.7 -45%	137 -116%	158.9 -151%
Load Maximum *	114	135.3 -19%	208.4 -83%	195.3 -71%	91.2 20%	94.7 17%	131.5 -15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		21h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		8h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 54min

	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh	HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51.5 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 71 Wh	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-10%	-48%	-47%	-34%
Reader / Idle	1289	910 -29%	1127 -13%	697 -46%	786 -39%
WiFi v1.3	503	467 -7%	528 5%	370 -26%	248 -51%	330 -34%
Load	174	199 14%	135 -22%	50 -71%	84 -52%

Pro

+ Impressionante desempenho dos jogos para o tamanho e peso

+ ScreenPad 2.0 para espaço adicional na tela

+ Desempenho potente com a bateria

+ Formato pequeno; portável

+ Base e tampa rígidas

+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Temperaturas mais altas do que os outros portáteis da série U

- Os cartões SD inseridos sobressaem por mais da metade do seu comprimento

- Teclas de seta e do teclado numérico apertadas

- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou leitor de SD

- Apenas uma solução de armazenamento M.2 2280

- Não é possível carregar via USB Tipo C

- RAM ou WLAN não atualizáveis

- A ScreenPad ainda é muito granulada

- Problemas de latência de DPC

In review: Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77. Test model provided by Xotic PC

O ZenBook 15 UX533 e o UX534 oferecem algo que a maioria dos outros Ultrabooks de 15,6 polegadas não oferece: Uma CPU Intel ULV junto com uma GPU GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. Concorrentes como o Dell XPS 15 ou HP Spectre x360 15 possuem CPUs Core série H mais rápidas com as opções GTX 1650 e, consequentemente, são maiores e mais pesados que o ZenBook. Esses processadores são melhores para criadores de conteúdo e artistas digitais e, portanto, tendem a ser um exagero para tarefas como navegação web, streaming de vídeo ou processamento de texto. O ZenBook 15 UX533/UX534 é a solução intermediária adequada para tarefas multimídia diárias, oferecendo quase o mesmo desempenho de jogo dos sistemas Dell ou HP acima mencionados, mas em um pacote com um consumo de energia mais eficiente. Com portáteis de jogos dedicados sendo ameaçados por dispositivos como o Google Stadia, o ZenBook 15 UX534 está em uma linha confortável entre um Ultrabook e uma máquina de jogos de nível de entrada.

O curinga da Asus é o seu ScreenPad, pois implica US$ 200 adicionais. Se o seu ZenBook estará ancorado em casa ou em uma mesa a maior parte do tempo, é melhor investir US$ 200 em um monitor externo adequado. Se você realiza várias tarefas múltiplas entre abas e janelas em cafeterias, aeroportos ou fora do escritório, há muito valor em ter uma segunda tela onde estiver. Esteja preparado para transportar um mouse externo com você para aproveitar melhor a configuração de tela dupla.

O ZenBook 15 UX534 é mais eficiente que a maioria dos outros Ultrabooks da sua classe de tamanho quando se trata de jogos. Você terá que desistir do Thunderbolt 3 e das CPUs Core da série H no processo, mas poderá nem perceber essas omissões se planeja usar o ZenBook principalmente para reprodução multimídia, jogos e processamento de texto, em movimento.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 - 2019-09-2909/29/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 79%

Teclado

82%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

53 / 80 → 67%

Peso

67 / 20-72 → 91%

Bateria

82 / 95 → 86%

Pantalha

78%

Desempenho do jogos

73 / 90 → 81%

Desempenho da aplicação

88 / 90 → 98%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

95 / 95 → 100%

Audio

76%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Médio

76%

83%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Linked Articles

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (ZenBook 15 UX534 Serie)

Análise

•

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus...

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F: Parece um Ultrabook, joga como um Gamer

Os Top 10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Linked Articles

Pricecompare