ZenBook com esteroides: Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581

Name: Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Brand: Asus

Duas telas 4K em um portátil. O mais recente ScreenPad Plus da Asus faz a Apple Touch Bar parecer uma brincadeira de criança. A CPU Core i9 desbloqueada, os gráficos GeForce RTX, o SSD Samsung de 1 TB e as 32 GB de RAM soldada são especificações pesadas que vêm com um chassi e preço igualmente robustos.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/22/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Laptop / Notebook Geforce

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV (ZenBook Pro Duo UX581 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 960 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 436.30, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-2666

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitiva, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

Placa de Som

Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Sensores: IR

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 359 x 246

Bateria

71 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Wrist rest, Active WACOM pen, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 768 g

Preço

3000 USD

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD DIN A4 ❌

Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2

Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2


365.5 cd/m²	355.3 cd/m²	357.7 cd/m²
367.7 cd/m²	359.7 cd/m²	361.3 cd/m²
379.7 cd/m²	373.2 cd/m²	376.1 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Samsung SDCA029 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 379.7 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 366.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 359.7 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
81.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160
Display		35%	4%	8%	6%	33%
Display P3 Coverage	63.5	85.9 35%	67.2 6%	66.2 4%	66.2 4%	88.1 39%
sRGB Coverage	81	100 23%	88.4 9%	96.5 19%	92.3 14%	99.6 23%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.3	99.1 47%	64.6 -4%	67.5 0%	67.2 0%	91.8 36%
Response Times		-1339%	-1634%	2962%	-453%	-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2.2 ?(1, 1.2)	44 ?(22, 22) -1900%	45 ?(21, 24) -1945%	17.2 ?(9.2, 8) -682%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -591%	2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	2.6 ?(1, 1.6)	22.8 ?(12, 10.8) -777%	37 ?(23, 14) -1323%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -331%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -315%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) 8%
PWM Frequency	240.4 ?(52)			24040 ?(29) 9900%		59.5 ?(100) -75%
Screen		9%	-18%	11%	-15%	1%
Brightness middle	359.7	357.6 -1%	311 -14%	266 -26%	324.8 -10%	421.2 17%
Brightness	366	350 -4%	303 -17%	252 -31%	316 -14%	417 14%
Brightness Distribution	94	85 -10%	81 -14%	88 -6%	84 -11%	94 0%
Black Level *		0.35	0.24	0.27	0.26
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.14	4.12 20%	5.1 1%	1.81 65%	4.96 4%	6.06 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.77	9.91 -28%	8.91 -15%	3.23 58%	8.95 -15%	11.89 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	1.8 33%	4.93 -83%	2.44 10%	5 -85%	2.8 -4%
Gamma	2 ^110%	2.17 ^101%	2.44 ^90%	2.42 ^91%	2.21 ^100%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6220 ^105%	6613 ^98%	7641 ^85%	7005 ^93%	7742 ^84%	6235 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61.8	87.5 42%	58 -6%	62 0%	59.8 -3%	81 31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	81.3	100 23%	88 8%	97 19%	91.8 13%	99.6 23%
Contrast		1022	1296	985	1249
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		4.23	2.48	1.03	3.23
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-432% / -192%	-549% / -261%	994% / 643%	-154% / -78%	3% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 52 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 52 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1573 (1526.78-1689.97)

MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)

Eurocom Nightsky RX15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1490 (1469.51-1815.95)

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI Intel Core i9-8950HK	206 Points +8%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	203 Points +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (181 - 215, n=13)	198.8 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK	190 Points
Asus G703 Intel Core i7-7820HK	185 Points -3%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	183 Points -4%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel Core i7-9750H	179 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points -10%
Asus FX504GD Intel Core i5-8300H	170 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H	167 Points -12%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	1987 Points +21%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (1327 - 1930, n=14)	1656 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK	1641 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H	1401 Points -15%
Asus Chimera G703GI Intel Core i9-8950HK	1312 Points -20%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1212 Points -26%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel Core i7-9750H	1166 Points -29%
Asus G703 Intel Core i7-7820HK	932 Points -43%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	850 Points -48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points -51%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points -55%
Asus FX504GD Intel Core i5-8300H	609 Points -63%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

131.1 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1641 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

190 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5991 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5826 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5654 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5469 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	5358 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4443 Points -21%
Essentials
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	9741 Points +2%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9701 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9524 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	9146 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	8971 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8233 Points -14%
Productivity
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	8025 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	8020 Points +7%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	7510 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7494 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7485 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6879 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	7976 Points +16%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	7311 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6880 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	6110 Points -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	5802 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4204 Points -39%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5039 Points +21%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	4578 Points +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4157 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4052 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3799 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	3661 Points -12%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5931 Points +12%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5919 Points +12%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5381 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5279 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4762 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	4456 Points -16%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4157 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5279 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5654 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
AS SSD		-0%	-23%	7%	-37%	16%
Seq Read	1409	2099 49%	579 -59%	1723 22%	1574 12%	2105 49%
Seq Write	1316	1729 31%	411.8 -69%	1386 5%	1591 21%	2493 89%
4K Read	44.99	37.78 -16%	41.81 -7%	43.25 -4%	26.79 -40%	25.01 -44%
4K Write	93	100.9 8%	131.6 42%	98.3 6%	105.1 13%	108.7 17%
4K-64 Read	1092	1431 31%	975 -11%	1078 -1%	583 -47%	1604 47%
4K-64 Write	1810	1273 -30%	1047 -42%	1456 -20%	603 -67%	1593 -12%
Access Time Read *	0.041	0.04 2%	0.08 -95%	0.05 -22%	0.128 -212%	0.046 -12%
Access Time Write *	0.118	0.036 69%	0.027 77%	0.039 67%	0.043 64%	0.102 14%
Score Read	1278	1679 31%	1075 -16%	1294 1%	768 -40%	1840 44%
Score Write	2034	1547 -24%	1220 -40%	1693 -17%	867 -57%	1951 -4%
Score Total	3970	4065 2%	2845 -28%	3638 -8%	2033 -49%	4743 19%
Copy ISO MB/s	2112	1045 -51%		3182 51%		2250 7%
Copy Program MB/s	874	430.9 -51%		984 13%		896 3%
Copy Game MB/s	1677	728 -57%		1824 9%		1854 11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3158 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2397 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 408.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1618 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1898 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.12 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Corsair One i160 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K	182888 Points +112%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	114542 Points +33%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	107368 Points +25%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	107083 Points +24%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	103040 Points +19%
Asus G752VS-BA338T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	101587 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (55324 - 116593, n=36)	93235 Points +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK	86229 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	80615 Points -7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	70414 Points -18%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	59375 Points -31%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	43721 Points -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Corsair One i160 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K	34697 Points +135%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	26223 Points +78%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	20434 Points +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points +31%
Asus G752VS-BA338T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	18346 Points +24%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	18219 Points +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43)	16301 Points +10%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	15343 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK	14768 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points -23%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	9350 Points -37%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	7291 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Corsair One i160 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K	14249 Points +148%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	10364 Points +81%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	7754 Points +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41)	6206 Points +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK	5738 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5699 Points -1%
Asus G752VS-BA338T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5651 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	5636 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points -37%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	3470 Points -40%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	2075 Points -64%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Corsair One i160 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K	49282 Points +151%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	36478 Points +85%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	26582 Points +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points +34%
Asus G752VS-BA338T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	24349 Points +24%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	23540 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40)	21459 Points +9%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	20784 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK	19666 Points
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	13143 Points -33%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points -36%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	8854 Points -55%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Corsair One i160 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), i9-9900K	18164 Points +38%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	16253 Points +23%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK	13191 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12421 Points -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	11904 Points -10%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	11888 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40)	11688 Points -11%
Asus G752VS-BA338T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8985 Points -32%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	8935 Points -32%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	8709 Points -34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points -48%

3DMark 11 Performance		17912 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		43412 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13696 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6059 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	142 fps +100%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	106 fps +49%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	97 fps +37%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	90 fps +27%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	83 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22)	74.6 fps +5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	73 fps +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	71 fps
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	45 fps -37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	43 fps -39%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	34 fps -52%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	131 (110^min - 147^max) fps +129%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	99.7 fps +74%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	80.6 fps +41%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	72.7 (61^min - 82^max) fps +27%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	69 fps +21%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	67 (55^min) fps +17%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	61.9 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40)	61.1 fps +7%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	60.5 fps +6%
Asus G752VS-BA338T Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	59.6 fps +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	57.2 fps
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	40 fps -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37.7 fps -34%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	36 fps -37%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	30 fps -48%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	24.2 fps -58%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø52.5 (49-57)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)	267	185.4	112.8	57.2	41.3
Rocket League (2017)	249	241.9	180.6		96.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	114	87	80	71	24

	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Noise		-3%	-4%	-4%	-22%	-9%
off / environment *	28.4	28 1%	30.5 -7%	28.2 1%	29 -2%	29 -2%
Idle Minimum *	29	28.6 1%	30.5 -5%	28.2 3%	30 -3%	30.5 -5%
Idle Average *	29	29.9 -3%	30.5 -5%	28.2 3%	37 -28%	31.5 -9%
Idle Maximum *	29	30.5 -5%	30.5 -5%	30.4 -5%	39 -34%	31.5 -9%
Load Average *	35.4	42.5 -20%	40.8 -15%	43.8 -24%	54 -53%	40.6 -15%
Witcher 3 ultra *	42	44.8 -7%		47.2 -12%	54 -29%	49.5 -18%
Load Maximum *	50	44.8 10%	41.8 16%	47.2 6%	54 -8%	53.4 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga		35.4 / 50 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


36.2 °C	36 °C	35.4 °C
40.4 °C	38.8 °C	39 °C
32.8 °C	32.8 °C	30.6 °C

Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C


46 °C	47.8 °C	44.4 °C
41.8 °C	39.2 °C	46.2 °C
36.4 °C	36.6 °C	39.6 °C

Máximo: 47.8 °C
Médio: 42 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


34.4 °C	34.4 °C	34 °C
35.6 °C	37.2 °C	35.4 °C
33.4 °C	33.4 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C


35.8 °C	36.8 °C	36.4 °C
35.6 °C	38 °C	36 °C
35 °C	35.4 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 36 °C

Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


37 °C	37 °C	37.2 °C
41 °C	39.8 °C	42 °C
34.6 °C	34.2 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C


45 °C	47.2 °C	43 °C
44 °C	38.8 °C	43.8 °C
37.2 °C	36.2 °C	38.8 °C

Máximo: 47.2 °C
Médio: 41.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 49.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.47 / 3.2 Watt
Ocioso	19.3 / 24.2 / 24.5 Watt
Carga	122.3 / 208.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		27%	61%	37%	-32%	-75%
Idle Minimum *	19.3	11.7 39%	2.7 86%	6.2 68%	29 -50%	46 -138%
Idle Average *	24.2	18.5 24%	8 67%	9.6 60%	32 -32%	59 -144%
Idle Maximum *	24.5	22.8 7%	10.6 57%	21.2 13%	37 -51%	65.5 -167%
Load Average *	122.3	97.5 20%	74 39%	104.3 15%	157 -28%	99.8 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	137	102.9 25%		91.7 33%	173 -26%	154.1 -12%
Load Maximum *	208.4	111.1 47%	89 57%	135.3 35%	217 -4%	222.7 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		13h 06min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 24min

	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 71 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Battery Runtime		16%	105%	80%	-30%	-42%
Reader / Idle	786	842 7%	1587 102%	910 16%	328 -58%	221 -72%
WiFi v1.3	248	375 51%	519 109%	467 88%	177 -29%	129 -48%
Load	84	76 -10%	171 104%	199 137%	81 -4%	80 -5%

Pro

+ Duas telas de igual PPI e largura

+ O modo de ventilador padrão normalmente é silencioso

+ Bom desempenho do Core i9-9980HK

+ Silencioso sob uso leve

+ Stylus ativo incluído

+ Base e tampa rígidas

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Wi-Fi 6

Contra

- Sem opções OLED+OLED ou IPS+IPS; gamas diferentes entre telas

- A OLED é mais escura que outros portáteis OLED

- Sem leitor de digitais ou Kensington Lock

- Sem opções de tela de 144/240 Hz

- Apenas um slot de armazenamento interno

- Tela secundária granulada

- Sem leitor SD ou RJ-45

- Curta duração da bateria

- Grosso e pesado

- RAM soldada

- Caro

In review: Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV-XB94T. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King

Adoramos o conceito único do ZenBook Pro Duo UX581 e o que ele representa. Ter uma segunda tela da mesma largura e mesmo PPI da tela principal torna mais ergonômico o uso do que as desproporcionais segundas telas do Razer Blade Pro 2015, Asus ZenBook 15 UX534 ou HP Omen X 2S 15. A desvantagem é que a Asus teve que fazer alguns sacrifícios importantes para integrar essa grande segunda tela. O mais notável é que o UX581 é mais grosso, pesado e significativamente mais caro que o Ultrabook ou portátil multimídia típico, o que torna este sistema mais um substituto de desktop do que algo verdadeiramente portátil.

Uma estranheza que profissionais exigentes podem detestar é a disparidade na qualidade entre as duas telas. Uma OLED brilhante com tempos de resposta super rápidos inerentemente será muito diferente de uma IPS mate com tempos de resposta mais lentos. Suspeitamos que o suprimento de painéis OLED com resolução de 3840 x 1110 seja limitado e, portanto, a Asus não teve escolha a não ser usar o IPS para o ScreenPad Plus.

Outras desvantagens incluem a menor duração da bateria, um slot de armazenamento único e a falta de um leitor SD e do NumPad táctil que os criadores ou profissionais de conteúdo têm maior probabilidade de aproveitar. Idealmente, as futuras iterações do ZenBook Pro Duo seriam capazes de integrar a segunda tela em um chassi do tamanho e peso de um elegante Ultrabook Razer Blade 15, XPS 15, ou Spectre x360 15 em vez de um portátil de jogos de tamanho mediano. Até lá, você não poderá encontrar uma melhor experiência de tela dupla fora do UX581.

O Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581 é o portátil de tela dupla mais maduro de todos os tempos. Ele aborda algumas das desvantagens do ScreenPad original para fornecer uma experiência de desktop mais natural. No entanto, os portáteis de tela dupla ainda estão em sua infância e a série ZenBook Pro Duo certamente pode se beneficiar de um design mais leve e fino no futuro.

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

76%

Conectividade

53 / 80 → 66%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Bateria

59 / 95 → 62%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

91%

Desempenho da aplicação

92%

Temperatura

85 / 95 → 90%

Ruído

87 / 90 → 96%

Audio

72%

Camera

35 / 85 → 41%

Médio

74%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > ZenBook com esteroides: Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581

Allen Ngo, 2019-09-22 (Update: 2019-09-30)

ZenBook com esteroides: Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare