Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 7A – o telefone com preço reduzido

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/14/2019

Surpreendentemente acessível. O Xiaomi Redmi 7A está disponível por US$ 100. Seu antecessor já tinha muito a oferecer, considerando seu baixo preço. O Redmi 7A, à primeira vista, parece não oferecer muitas mudanças. Será que consegue manter sua excelente relação preço / desempenho?

Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Redmi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.45 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, dedicado, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.6 x 146.3 x 70.4
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.2, 1.12µm, phase detection auto focus, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, LED para notificações (uma cor), SAR value: 0.557 W/kg (head), 1.166 W/kg (body), LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mbps), fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A

Size Comparison

153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g147 mm 71 mm 9 mm 150 g146.3 mm 70.4 mm 9.6 mm 165 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g147.1 mm 70.8 mm 8.5 mm 146 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼100% +272%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼28% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 52, max: 64) MBit/s ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% -1%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 49, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% -7%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -19%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +294%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 29, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% +4%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 (min: 25, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -2%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% -13%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – field
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – field
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – overview
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – overview
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – bridge
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – bridge
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – field
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – field

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photo of test chart
Photo of test chart
Detail of test chart
Color Checker Colors. The bottom half of each box displays the reference color.
482
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 534 cd/m² Médio: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 888:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Motorola Moto E5 Play
IPS, 960x480, 5.2
Huawei Y5 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Screen
21%
25%
6%
-28%
6%
Brightness middle
533
404
-24%
417
-22%
338
-37%
369
-31%
630
18%
Brightness
506
400
-21%
395
-22%
327
-35%
358
-29%
593
17%
Brightness Distribution
88
82
-7%
88
0%
82
-7%
81
-8%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.6
0.26
57%
0.18
70%
0.27
55%
0.4
33%
0.66
-10%
Contrast
888
1554
75%
2317
161%
1252
41%
923
4%
955
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
4.28
24%
6.46
-15%
5.36
4%
9.75
-74%
5.79
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.4
9.97
13%
10.72
6%
9.77
14%
18.28
-60%
9.54
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
3.5
53%
5.8
22%
6.2
16%
11.8
-59%
7
5%
Gamma
2.212 99%
2.213 99%
2.423 91%
2.345 94%
2.057 107%
2.176 101%
CCT
7974 82%
6899 94%
7839 83%
8460 77%
11971 54%
8420 77%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
78.6

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 384.6 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 384.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 384.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3068 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼54% -19%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼61% -8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼35% -48%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1635 Points ∼36% -47%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2436 Points ∼53% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3068 - 3267, n=2)
3168 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼100% +50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
863 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼60% -4%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼49% -22%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼46% -26%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
647 Points ∼47% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
839 Points ∼61% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (863 - 891, n=2)
877 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼100% +59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4594 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼77% -15%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼62% -32%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3209 Points ∼64% -30%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4195 Points ∼83% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4594 - 4623, n=2)
4609 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼100% +10%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
5880 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼100% +5%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼82% -13%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4152 Points ∼67% -29%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5616 Points ∼91% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=2)
6054 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼89% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2134 Points ∼90%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1868 Points ∼79% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2134 - 2172, n=2)
2153 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
408 Points ∼17%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
210 Points ∼9% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 408, n=2)
405 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼100% +472%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
497 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼13% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 497, n=2)
494 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼100% +310%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1595 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼42% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼71% -18%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
940 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1595, n=2)
1548 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=386)
1836 Points ∼100% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
419 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼16% -38%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼19% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼16% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 419, n=2)
416 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=386)
1605 Points ∼100% +283%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼20% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼20% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 501, n=2)
497 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=389)
1492 Points ∼100% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1594 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼45% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼71% -19%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼49% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
877 Points ∼48% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
924 Points ∼51% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1594, n=2)
1555 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1813 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
730 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼20% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼24% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼11% -66%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
249 Points ∼11% -66%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
451 Points ∼21% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 730, n=2)
721 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=401)
2189 Points ∼100% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
830 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼27% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼33% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼16% -64%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
296 Points ∼16% -64%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
509 Points ∼27% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 830, n=2)
819 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=402)
1863 Points ∼100% +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1610 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼47% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼69% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
918 Points ∼52% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1610, n=2)
1593 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=462)
1774 Points ∼100% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
370 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼17% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼19% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼15% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (366 - 370, n=2)
368 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=464)
1337 Points ∼100% +261%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼21% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼24% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
239 Points ∼19% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (441 - 446, n=2)
444 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=472)
1275 Points ∼100% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1579 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼50% -47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼75% -20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼53% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
819 Points ∼49% -48%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
911 Points ∼54% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1568 - 1579, n=2)
1574 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=495)
1682 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
724 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼22% -44%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼30% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼3% -94%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
199 Points ∼11% -73%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
362 Points ∼20% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 724, n=2)
714 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=495)
1806 Points ∼100% +149%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
823 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼29% -45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼40% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼4% -93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
239 Points ∼15% -71%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
418 Points ∼27% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 823, n=2)
813 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=503)
1551 Points ∼100% +88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12673 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼94% +11%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼62% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼69% -18%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10784 Points ∼72% -15%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15004 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (12390 - 12673, n=2)
12532 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼91% +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13510 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼34% -50%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼48% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼27% -59%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5712 Points ∼28% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7514 Points ∼37% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13440 - 13510, n=2)
13475 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼100% +49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13315 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼46% -42%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼57% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼37% -54%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6379 Points ∼38% -52%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8452 Points ∼51% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13192 - 13315, n=2)
13254 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼100% +25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
23 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼37% -43%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% -30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22% -67%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22% -67%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (23 - 23, n=2)
23 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=683)
35.2 fps ∼100% +53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼54% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼77% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼40% -60%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
20 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (34 - 35, n=2)
34.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=686)
27.2 fps ∼78% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
19 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼32% -67%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼36% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼14% -86%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼14% -86%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼33% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.8 - 19, n=2)
14.4 fps ∼74% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=602)
19.5 fps ∼100% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.9 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼67% +21%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼78% +41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼34% -38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
11 fps ∼61% +11%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼67% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.9 - 18, n=2)
14 fps ∼78% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=607)
18 fps ∼100% +82%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼25% -37%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼29% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼27% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.4, n=2)
6.4 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=463)
15.9 fps ∼100% +148%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼49% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼65% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.8 fps ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13 - 14, n=2)
13.5 fps ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=466)
15.3 fps ∼100% +9%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4.1 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼30% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.9 - 4.1, n=2)
4 fps ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=166)
8.92 fps ∼100% +118%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼14% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼13% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=2)
1.2 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=166)
6.19 fps ∼100% +416%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
6.6 fps ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=167)
13.5 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.7 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼16% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼16% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=2)
3.65 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=167)
14.8 fps ∼100% +300%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼18% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼19% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.5, n=2)
3.5 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=392)
10.7 fps ∼100% +206%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.3 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼33% -56%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼56% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.2 fps ∼33% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (7 - 7.3, n=2)
7.15 fps ∼74% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=396)
9.7 fps ∼100% +33%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
75175 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼47% -18%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼46% -20%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
63421 Points ∼48% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (75175 - 77652, n=2)
76414 Points ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼100% +75%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1083 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼68% -32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼60% -40%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
720 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
775 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (834 - 1083, n=2)
959 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼69% -31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1007 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼25% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼38% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼22% -57%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
418 Points ∼21% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
471 Points ∼24% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1000 - 1007, n=2)
1004 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼100% +95%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
655 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼41% -7%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼82% +85%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼34% -23%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
490 Points ∼33% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1421 Points ∼96% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1316, n=2)
986 Points ∼67% +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼100% +125%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2238 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼50% -36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼68% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼43% -45%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1241 Points ∼43% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1798 Points ∼62% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=2)
2463 Points ∼85% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼100% +29%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1124 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼52% -34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼73% -6%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼45% -43%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
654 Points ∼46% -42%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
983 Points ∼68% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1124 - 1310, n=2)
1217 Points ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼100% +28%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=93)
30.6 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
16.911 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=2)
16.4 Points ∼54% -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
15.682 Points ∼51% -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=82)
34.6 runs/min ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chome 76)
18.45 runs/min ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (18.2 - 18.5, n=2)
18.3 runs/min ∼53% -1%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)
14.7 runs/min ∼42% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼100% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (34 - 38, n=2)
36 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
35 Points ∼56% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
34 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼48% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4701 - 4810, n=2)
4756 Points ∼75% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
4701 Points ∼74%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
4603 Points ∼72% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼68% -8%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼53% -28%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼39% -47%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2412 Points ∼38% -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -45%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼94% -36%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
13477 ms * ∼92% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼73% -6%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
10364 ms * ∼70% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
10142.7 ms * ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=2)
9956 ms * ∼68% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6AHonor 7A Nokia 2.1Motorola Moto E5 PlayHuawei Y5 2019Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
84%
-5%
0%
43%
1%
-38%
14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
28.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-55%
63.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
38.6 (6.38 - 65.7, n=130)
-40%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
81.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
57.6 (8.1 - 87.7, n=130)
-32%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
9.6
52.23
444%
9.4
-2%
13.45
40%
43.16
350%
13.1
36%
7.9 (0.49 - 44.9, n=246)
-18%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
115%
Random Read 4KB
57.8
33.94
-41%
39.2
-32%
50.46
-13%
46.31
-20%
62.1
7%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=246)
-63%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB
68.7
131.67
92%
72.5
6%
51.18
-26%
52.2
-24%
45.2
-34%
42.6 (8.74 - 106, n=246)
-38%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
35%
Sequential Read 256KB
258
277.54
8%
254.8
-1%
288.26
12%
279
8%
272.1
5%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=246)
-36%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
2%
010203040Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.6 (15-30)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø25.7 (3-30)
Carga Máxima
 40.5 °C38.3 °C37.5 °C 
 40.5 °C38.5 °C38.2 °C 
 40 °C38.9 °C38.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 39 °C
36.5 °C38.7 °C39.9 °C
36 °C38.5 °C39.9 °C
36.3 °C39.2 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.938.22538.336.43131.8304034.135.1504439.76331.729.880252610026.729.512523.922.916021.832.620020.343.525019.65031518.855.340017.560.750020.16663019.771.280017.372.5100017.473.8125015.471.4160016.471.8200016.472.1250015.568.5315015.665.4400015.765500016.169.963001669.3800016.568.61000016.368.41250015.968.61600015.859SPL702969.782N25.31.223.752.9median 16.5median 68.4Delta28.936.945.536.544.937.239.137.641.231.73523.823.724.425.123.625.119.922.723.32418.430.718.238.215.845.114.653.415.557.21361.512.364.712.166.111.965.810.768.210.768.110.566.610.366.810.767.210.565.510.56510.663.210.662.510.553.710.641.461.552.561.424.177.814.68.214.50.639.8median 11.9median 62.53.412.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.6 / 2.2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.9 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
17%
-22%
16%
-3%
-10%
3%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.7
12%
1.3
-63%
0.7
12%
1.2
-50%
1.2
-50%
0.77 (0.74 - 0.8, n=2)
4%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=751)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.9
-19%
1.75 (1.6 - 1.9, n=2)
-9%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=750)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2
9%
2.9
-32%
1.9
14%
2
9%
2.4
-9%
2.21 (2.2 - 2.21, n=2)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=751)
8%
Load Average *
3.9
3.4
13%
3.7
5%
3.2
18%
3.6
8%
3.3
15%
3.47 (3.04 - 3.9, n=2)
11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=745)
-4%
Load Maximum *
5.4
4
26%
6.4
-19%
4.8
11%
4.5
17%
4.6
15%
4.78 (4.15 - 5.4, n=2)
11%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=745)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 46min
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-23%
-5%
-55%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1543
1256
-19%
H.264
902
732
-19%
WiFi v1.3
853
761
-11%
657
-23%
809
-5%
382.9
-55%
709
-17%
Load
286
249
-13%

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Design de carcaça ergonômica
+ Tela brilhante
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Software atual

Contra

- GPS bastante impreciso
- Qualidade de voz medíocre
- Sem leitor de digitais
- A tela tem relação de contraste ruim

Veredicto – Tão acessível e tão potente

Review: Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Review: Xiaomi Redmi 7A

Os telefones Redmi da Xiaomi são cortadores de preços - eles continuamente estabelecem novos padrões em sua faixa de preço: O Remi 7A está disponível por cerca de US$ 100 (dependendo da configuração) e oferece recursos que normalmente só vemos em smartphones que são o dobro do preço. Por exemplo, o telefone funciona com um Snapdragon 439, um SoC poderoso que oferece muito valor pelo seu dinheiro. A duração da bateria muito longa, os grandes alto-falantes e a adequação aos jogos completam o conjunto de excelentes recursos. A câmera tira fotos decentes, a tela é brilhante e o aquecimento é tolerável sob carga. As novas opções de cores dão ao telefone Xiaomi um visual moderno e fresco que também é muito confortável de segurar. Graças à função de carga rápida, o smartphone também recarrega rapidamente.  

É uma coleção de pontos fortes para um dispositivo tão acessível e dificilmente qualquer concorrente nessa faixa de preço pode igualar-se a ele. O telefone inclusive supera o seu antecessor com uma maior duração da bateria e maior desempenho. O fato de os modelos Redmi A não estarem equipados com um leitor de digitais é uma vergonha, no entanto, assim como o GPS impreciso e o fone ligeiramente abafado.

Se você está procurando por um smartphone acessível e ainda quer um bom desempenho e uma bateria de longa duração, o Redmi 7A pode ser o telefone certo para você.

Podemos definitivamente recomendar o Xiaomi Redmi 7A. Apenas certifique-se de comprar a versão global de um revendedor confiável, pois você pode ter problemas com o adaptador de CA e a garantia.

Xiaomi Redmi 7A - 08/08/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
74%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 65%
Peso
91%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
32 / 63 → 50%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 71%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
63%
Médio
72%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 7A – o telefone com preço reduzido
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-14 (Update: 2019-08-16)