Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 3

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/03/2016

Preço econômico, desempenho convencional. O mais recente modelo do acessível Redmi do fabricante chinês possui uma retro iluminação surpreendentemente brilhante e uma longa duração da bateria com o novo SoC Snapdragon 616 por pouco menos de $160 USD.

Xiaomi Redmi 3 (Redmi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, capacitiva de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giro, proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, A2DP, bandas 2G: GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 3G Bands: HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 TD-SCDMA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO 4G bands: LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) Speed: HSPA, LTE, EV-DO Rev.A 3,1 Mbps, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 139.3 x 69.6
Bateria
4100 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, detecção de face auto foco, Flash LED
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, [email protected]
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Monaural, Adaptador de força (EU), Adaptador de Força (UE), Cabo MicroUSB, MIUI 7.0, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
144 g
Preço
159 USD

 

Top: 3.5 mm audio
Top: 3.5 mm audio
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Bottom: Micro-USB 2.0
Bottom: Micro-USB 2.0
Left: Dual SIM and MicroSD tray
Left: Dual SIM and MicroSD tray
Garmin 500
Garmin 500
Redmi 3
Redmi 3
1 m from source
1 m from source
10 m from source
10 m from source
25 m from source
25 m from source
505.4
cd/m²
490.2
cd/m²
466.2
cd/m²
497.9
cd/m²
488.6
cd/m²
454.1
cd/m²
509.8
cd/m²
490.9
cd/m²
452.6
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 509.8 cd/m² Médio: 484 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.551 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.36
Xiaomi Redmi 3
5, 1280x720
Xiaomi Redmi 2
4.7, 1280x720
Google Nexus 5X
5.2, 1920x1080
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
5, 1280x720
HTC One M9
5, 1920x1080
Microsoft Lumia 640
5, 1280x720
OnePlus X
5, 1920x1080
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50 (17, 33)
Response Time Black / White *
35 (16, 19)
PWM Frequency
237 (25)
Screen
-20%
32%
33%
4%
10%
-26%
Brightness middle
488.6
421.4
-14%
503
3%
467
-4%
474
-3%
433
-11%
312
-36%
Brightness
484
429
-11%
498
3%
460
-5%
458
-5%
429
-11%
314
-35%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
97
9%
95
7%
85
-4%
95
7%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.551
0.642
-17%
0.38
31%
0.3
46%
0.4
27%
0.52
6%
Contrast
887
656
-26%
1324
49%
1557
76%
1185
34%
833
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.5
7.31
-12%
2.09
68%
3.28
50%
6.32
3%
3.42
47%
6.28
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
7.88
-58%
2.12
58%
1.89
62%
6.36
-27%
3.03
39%
8.24
-65%
Gamma
2.36 102%
2.51 96%
2.27 106%
2.21 109%
2.43 99%
2.16 111%
2.12 113%
CCT
7677 85%
8944 73%
6621 98%
6734 97%
8218 79%
7081 92%
8145 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.81
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-20% / -20%
32% / 32%
33% / 33%
4% / 4%
10% / 10%
-26% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
289.805 MFLOPS ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
839.138 MFLOPS ∼100% +190%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
267.725 MFLOPS ∼32% -8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
262.042 MFLOPS ∼31% -10%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
242.472 MFLOPS ∼29% -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
207.718 MFLOPS ∼25% -28%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
221.196 MFLOPS ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
625.622 MFLOPS ∼100% +183%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
225.966 MFLOPS ∼36% +2%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
87.088 MFLOPS ∼14% -61%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
80.21 MFLOPS ∼13% -64%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
117.086 MFLOPS ∼19% -47%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3570 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5050 Points ∼100% +41%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3909 Points ∼77% +9%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4716 Points ∼93% +32%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4324 Points ∼86% +21%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3701 Points ∼73% +4%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
34451 Points ∼43%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79502 Points ∼100% +131%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4843 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1563 Points ∼32%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1329 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
528 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2792 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5619 Points ∼100% +101%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2721 Points ∼48% -3%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4587 Points ∼82% +64%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3530 Points ∼63% +26%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1561 Points ∼28% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
613 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1503 Points ∼100% +145%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
693 Points ∼46% +13%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1335 Points ∼89% +118%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1246 Points ∼83% +103%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
526 Points ∼35% -14%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3642 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9334 Points ∼100% +156%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3438 Points ∼37% -6%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8622 Points ∼92% +137%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7553 Points ∼81% +107%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3125 Points ∼33% -14%
Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1444 points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2731 points ∼100% +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1203 points ∼44% -17%
Sunspider
1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1258 ms * ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
347.1 ms * ∼21% +72%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1688.1 ms * ∼100% -34%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
529.7 ms * ∼31% +58%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
657.13 ms * ∼39% +48%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1573.1 ms * ∼93% -25%
0.9.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1218.4 ms * ∼100%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.879 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.193 Points ∼100% +115%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.892 Points ∼47% 0%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼96% +107%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points ∼91% +97%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
20.832 Points ∼42% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12194.1 ms * ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4037.4 ms * ∼20% +67%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20190.1 ms * ∼100% -66%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * ∼21% +66%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4733.8 ms * ∼23% +61%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
11843 ms * ∼59% +3%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3647 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8650 Points ∼98% +137%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3253 Points ∼37% -11%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points ∼100% +141%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8202 Points ∼93% +125%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3296 Points ∼37% -10%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼56%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57 Points ∼49% -12%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼100% +78%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
107 Points ∼92% +65%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52 Points ∼45% -20%
Vellamo 3.x
Metal (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1130 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2583 Points ∼100% +129%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1219 Points ∼47% +8%
Multicore Beta (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1816 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3425 Points ∼100% +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
966 Points ∼28% -47%
Browser (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2620 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5463 Points ∼100% +109%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2043 (min: 1641) Points ∼37% -22%
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - --- (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22393 points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
36419 points ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15455 points ∼42% -31%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15455 points ∼42% -31%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4107 points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4498 points ∼100% +10%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2614 points ∼58% -36%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4332 points ∼96% +5%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4369 points ∼97% +6%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3234 points ∼72% -21%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4823 points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13558 points ∼100% +181%
Medion Life X5020
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4518 points ∼33% -6%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10823 points ∼80% +124%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8443 points ∼62% +75%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
4962 points ∼37% +3%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
884 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2345 Points ∼100% +165%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
811 Points ∼35% -8%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3597 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5274 Points ∼100% +47%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2745 Points ∼52% -24%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4948 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6924 Points ∼100% +40%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3154 Points ∼46% -36%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15395 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
68872 Points ∼100% +347%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
7518 Points ∼11% -51%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
96167 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
176225 Points ∼100% +83%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
13288 Points ∼8% -86%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3911 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8438 Points ∼100% +116%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2966 Points ∼35% -24%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.19 MB/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20.95 MB/s ∼100% +128%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.21 MB/s ∼58% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
10.93 MB/s ∼52% +19%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
5.11 MB/s ∼24% -44%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17.48 MB/s ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
89.91 MB/s ∼100% +414%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.8 MB/s ∼28% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
18.34 MB/s ∼20% +5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
22.79 MB/s ∼25% +30%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
26.6 MB/s ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151.11 MB/s ∼100% +468%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.64 MB/s ∼65% +271%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
37.81 MB/s ∼25% +42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
22.33 MB/s ∼15% -16%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.47 MB/s ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
382.97 MB/s ∼100% +175%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
245.19 MB/s ∼64% +76%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
137.25 MB/s ∼36% -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
131.42 MB/s ∼34% -6%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2.7 fps ∼19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.52 fps ∼100% +438%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6.6 fps ∼45% +144%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.8 fps ∼40% +115%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
0.74 fps ∼5% -73%
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼98%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60.1 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.2 fps ∼80% -18%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
31.9 fps ∼53% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
30.3 fps ∼50% -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
31.9 fps ∼53% -46%
High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.4 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
55 fps ∼93% -7%
High Performance (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.9 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
57.4 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
57.1 fps ∼95% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1402 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1606 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1074 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1155 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1132 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1232 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
990 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1348 Points ∼87% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1552 Points ∼100% +57%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
974 Points ∼63% -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
758 Points ∼49% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
410 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2336 Points ∼100% +470%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1471 Points ∼63% +259%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points ∼8% -57%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
39 Points ∼2% -90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
471 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2009 Points ∼100% +327%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1488 Points ∼74% +216%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
218 Points ∼11% -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49 Points ∼2% -90%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8764 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12852 Points ∼74% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17380 Points ∼100% +98%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6839 Points ∼39% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
9455 Points ∼54% +8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
10148 Points ∼58% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9272 Points ∼25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37725 Points ∼100% +307%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
26964 Points ∼71% +191%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7796 Points ∼21% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
3830 Points ∼10% -59%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3789 Points ∼10% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9154 Points ∼35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26380 Points ∼100% +188%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
24020 Points ∼91% +162%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7561 Points ∼29% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
4413 Points ∼17% -52%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
4402 Points ∼17% -52%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8537 Points ∼89%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6841 Points ∼72% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
9185 Points ∼96% +8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
9544 Points ∼100% +12%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5379 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5082 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
2199 Points ∼41% -59%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2135 Points ∼40% -60%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5861 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5390 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
2646 Points ∼45% -55%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2580 Points ∼44% -56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8520 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6799 Points ∼72% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
9190 Points ∼98% +8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
9385 Points ∼100% +10%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10918 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10194 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
4749 Points ∼43% -57%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
4712 Points ∼43% -57%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 3
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10275 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9176 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 2
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD
5320 Points ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
5298 Points ∼52% -48%
Carga Máxima
 43.6 °C37.6 °C35 °C 
 38.6 °C36.2 °C35 °C 
 37.2 °C35.4 °C34.6 °C 
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 37 °C
34.8 °C35.6 °C37.6 °C
34.4 °C35.6 °C37 °C
34.6 °C35.8 °C37 °C
Máximo: 37.6 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C
Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
Xiaomi Redmi 3
4100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 2
2200 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
2700 mAh
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
2070 mAh
HTC One M9
2840 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 640
2500 mAh
OnePlus X
2525 mAh
Battery Runtime
-46%
-31%
-66%
-48%
-46%
-26%
Reader / Idle
2483
1062
-57%
1775
-29%
805
-68%
1078
-57%
968
-61%
WiFi v1.3
781
354
-55%
412
-47%
267
-66%
348
-55%
502
-36%
549
-30%
Load
298
218
-27%
245
-18%
236
-21%
166
-44%
339
14%
WiFi
573
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
41h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 01min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 58min

Pro

+ Design mais fino e elegante
+ Tela maior que do Redmi 2 com cores mais precisas e escala de cinzas
+ Retro iluminação brilhante
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ Emissor de IV
+ Boa câmera para o preço
+ Econômico
+ Não há afogamentos

Contra

- Bateria não removível
- MicroSD e cartões SIM secundários usam o mesmo slot
- Sem USB Tipo-C, MHL, ou NFC
- Sem opção de 1080p
- A distribuição do brilho poderia ser melhor
- Cores azuis menos precisas
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 3. Test model provided by Buygou.
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 3. Test model provided by Buygou.

Os smartphones chineses econômicos eram mais difíceis de recomendar no passado, mas grandes fabricantes como Huawei e Xiaomi estão demonstrando bastante rapidamente que os usuários não precisam gastar mais de $200 ou $300 USD por um smartphone novo e perfeitamente confiável. O Redmi 3 se sente menos como um brinquedo e mais como um convencional profissional sem economizar em áreas chave como a qualidade da tela, qualidade de construção, ou duração da bateria. De fato, a Xiaomi se destaca em algumas categorias incluindo sua iluminação excepcionalmente brilhante e longas durações da bateria.

No que diz respeito ao hardware, dificilmente encontrará um smartphone neste início de ano, com 2 GB de RAM e um SoC Snapdragon 616 por menos de $160. Estamos um pouco decepcionados pela falta de uma 1080p, NFC, USB Tipo-C, e uma tampa traseira removível, porém, um digno sucessor do Redmi 2 em todo sentido.

A Xiaomi está começando o ano novo com uma de suas melhores ofertas até a data com o Redmi 3. Sua iluminação e duração da bateria são excepcionais inclusive quando comparado com smartphones em faixas de preços superiores.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Xiaomi Redmi 3 - 01/23/2016 v4.1(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
78%
Teclado
80 / 75 → 100%
Mouse
80%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
93%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 63 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
45 / 70 → 64%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
70%
Médio
76%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 3
Allen Ngo, 2016-02- 3 (Update: 2017-05-23)