Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite)

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/28/2018

Notch here, notch there – notch everywhere. Com a série Redmi da Xiaomi, a "inovação" do ano passado em Cupertino atingiu o mercado de smartphones de gama média de preço baixo. O Redmi 6 oferece um excelente desempenho, além de - ou talvez apesar de - o entalhe no terço superior da tela. Nossa análise detalhada inclui mais informações sobre o desempenho do smartphone Xiaomi e responde à pergunta de se vale a pena a importação deste smartphone de gama média.

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Redmi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.84 polegadas 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Tela multi-touch capacitiva, LCD IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: headphone jack (3.5 mm), Card Reader: mircoUSB até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, Bandeja tripla (2x nano SIM, 1 cartão SD), OTG, LED de status, Miracast, desbloqueio facial
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, network standard 4G/FDD LTE - 2100MHz(1)/1800MHz(3)/850MHz(5)/2600MHz(7)/900MHz(8) network standard 3G/WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100MHz network standard 2G/GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 149.3 x 71.7
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+5MP, f/​2.2, phase detection AF, LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de força, cabo de dados micro-USB, Fonte de alimentação modular, MiUI, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR: 0.94 W/kg (body), 0.74 W/kg (head), fanless
peso
178 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g
Preço
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼100% +80%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼57% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼55% -1%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼22% -61%
Honor 7C
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼22% -61%
Wiko View Max
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.6 MBit/s ∼22% -61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼21% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼58%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼57% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼52% -9%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.6 MBit/s ∼28% -51%
Honor 7C
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 MBit/s ∼26% -55%
Wiko View Max
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 MBit/s ∼23% -60%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼23% -61%
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Software Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Software Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Software Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Software Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Software Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
HDR mode
HDR mode
Standard mode
Standard mode
Dual camera photo
Dual camera photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
516
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 564 cd/m² Médio: 538.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.37 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.281
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
HTC Desire 12 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Wiko View Max
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Honor 7C
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG K11
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
-9%
-28%
-12%
16%
-45%
0%
Brightness middle
554
418
-25%
515
-7%
392
-29%
512
-8%
394
-29%
549
-1%
Brightness
538
414
-23%
498
-7%
403
-25%
500
-7%
385
-28%
541
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
90
-1%
85
-7%
90
-1%
93
2%
95
4%
Black Level *
0.61
0.7
-15%
0.48
21%
0.61
-0%
0.35
43%
0.66
-8%
0.42
31%
Contrast
908
597
-34%
1073
18%
643
-29%
1463
61%
597
-34%
1307
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.86
4.2
14%
7.8
-60%
5.4
-11%
4.6
5%
8.2
-69%
6.08
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.46
8.3
2%
15.87
-88%
9.7
-15%
7.6
10%
21.5
-154%
10.69
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
4.7
11%
10.6
-100%
4.2
21%
3.8
28%
7.5
-42%
6.6
-25%
Gamma
2.281 96%
2.27 97%
2.246 98%
2.59 85%
2.11 104%
2.6 85%
2.305 95%
CCT
7770 84%
7394 88%
9715 67%
6734 97%
6952 93%
7581 86%
8399 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
68348 Points ∼30%
Wiko View Max
31018 Points ∼13% -55%
Honor 7C
54731 Points ∼24% -20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
63746 Points ∼28% -7%
LG K11
39898 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17)
63396 Points ∼27% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼33% +12%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
79099 Points ∼27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
56497 Points ∼19% -29%
Wiko View Max
39765 Points ∼14% -50%
Honor 7C
71167 Points ∼25% -10%
LG K11
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points ∼100% +267%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=7)
65501 Points ∼23% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼41% +50%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4828 Points ∼58%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
4759 Points ∼57% -1%
Wiko View Max
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7C
4736 Points ∼57% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5035 Points ∼61% +4%
LG K11
3249 Points ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14)
4894 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼55% -6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
5716 Points ∼98%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
5393 Points ∼92% -6%
Honor 7C
5656 Points ∼97% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5656 Points ∼97% -1%
LG K11
4241 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16)
5855 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼85% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
753 Points ∼61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
756 Points ∼61% 0%
Wiko View Max
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 7C
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
679 Points ∼55% -10%
LG K11
679 Points ∼55% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=17)
772 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼56% -7%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
999 Points ∼17%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
965 Points ∼17% -3%
Wiko View Max
149 Points ∼3% -85%
Honor 7C
955 Points ∼16% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
986 Points ∼17% -1%
LG K11
487 Points ∼8% -51%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points ∼100% +485%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=17)
1008 Points ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼30% +74%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
996 Points ∼35%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
849 Points ∼30% -15%
Wiko View Max
683 Points ∼24% -31%
Honor 7C
1522 Points ∼53% +53%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
584 Points ∼20% -41%
LG K11
728 Points ∼25% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points ∼100% +188%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=17)
1018 Points ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼43% +25%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3154 Points ∼44%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2898 Points ∼41% -8%
Wiko View Max
1122 Points ∼16% -64%
Honor 7C
2665 Points ∼38% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2914 Points ∼41% -8%
LG K11
1599 Points ∼23% -49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points ∼100% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=17)
2819 Points ∼40% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼35% -20%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1170 Points ∼34%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1158 Points ∼33% -1%
Wiko View Max
182 Points ∼5% -84%
Honor 7C
442 Points ∼13% -62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1033 Points ∼30% -12%
LG K11
787 Points ∼23% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points ∼100% +198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1362, n=17)
1206 Points ∼35% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼36% +7%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3644 Points ∼27%
Wiko View Max
1125 Points ∼8% -69%
Honor 7C
2800 Points ∼21% -23%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2628 Points ∼19% -28%
LG K11
1559 Points ∼11% -57%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points ∼100% +274%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10)
3281 Points ∼24% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼33% +24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4369 Points ∼52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3272 Points ∼39% -25%
Wiko View Max
1664 Points ∼20% -62%
Honor 7C
3913 Points ∼46% -10%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
4308 Points ∼51% -1%
LG K11
2259 Points ∼27% -48%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12)
4171 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼51% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
880 Points ∼36%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
741 Points ∼30% -16%
Wiko View Max
585 Points ∼24% -34%
Honor 7C
758 Points ∼31% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
841 Points ∼35% -4%
LG K11
609 Points ∼25% -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points ∼100% +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=13)
799 Points ∼33% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼52% +44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2104 Points ∼62%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1521 Points ∼45% -28%
Wiko View Max
530 Points ∼16% -75%
Honor 7C
1817 Points ∼53% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2021 Points ∼59% -4%
LG K11
1233 Points ∼36% -41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=17)
1958 Points ∼57% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼48% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
392 Points ∼8%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
367 Points ∼7% -6%
Wiko View Max
67 Points ∼1% -83%
Honor 7C
366 Points ∼7% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
379 Points ∼7% -3%
LG K11
252 Points ∼5% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points ∼100% +1232%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 397, n=17)
384 Points ∼7% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
479 Points ∼10%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
441 Points ∼9% -8%
Wiko View Max
83 Points ∼2% -83%
Honor 7C
445 Points ∼10% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
463 Points ∼10% -3%
LG K11
306 Points ∼7% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points ∼100% +875%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 484, n=17)
467 Points ∼10% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% +137%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2098 Points ∼61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1504 Points ∼44% -28%
Wiko View Max
524 Points ∼15% -75%
Honor 7C
1809 Points ∼53% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2016 Points ∼59% -4%
LG K11
1127 Points ∼33% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=17)
1968 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼45% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
743 Points ∼9%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
716 Points ∼9% -4%
Wiko View Max
108 Points ∼1% -85%
Honor 7C
713 Points ∼9% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
723 Points ∼9% -3%
LG K11
381 Points ∼5% -49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points ∼100% +1019%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 751, n=17)
710 Points ∼9% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% +120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
867 Points ∼14%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
810 Points ∼13% -7%
Wiko View Max
131 Points ∼2% -85%
Honor 7C
824 Points ∼13% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
843 Points ∼13% -3%
LG K11
447 Points ∼7% -48%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points ∼100% +629%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 876, n=17)
826 Points ∼13% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% +60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
15870 Points ∼51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13596 Points ∼43% -14%
Wiko View Max
9264 Points ∼30% -42%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
15860 Points ∼51% 0%
LG K11
10285 Points ∼33% -35%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points ∼100% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=16)
15727 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼41% -19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13369 Points ∼16%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12347 Points ∼15% -8%
Wiko View Max
2892 Points ∼4% -78%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13225 Points ∼16% -1%
LG K11
8177 Points ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points ∼100% +517%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=16)
12957 Points ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼22% +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13847 Points ∼23%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12604 Points ∼21% -9%
Wiko View Max
3414 Points ∼6% -75%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13732 Points ∼23% -1%
LG K11
8567 Points ∼14% -38%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points ∼100% +337%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=16)
13468 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼25% +9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
23 fps ∼15%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
21 fps ∼14% -9%
Wiko View Max
5 fps ∼3% -78%
Honor 7C
21 fps ∼14% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
23 fps ∼15% 0%
LG K11
13 fps ∼9% -43%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps ∼100% +557%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17)
22.9 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼21% +37%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
21 fps ∼35%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Wiko View Max
8.2 fps ∼14% -61%
Honor 7C
34 fps ∼57% +62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
19 fps ∼32% -10%
LG K11
22 fps ∼37% +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17)
22.9 fps ∼38% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼42% +19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.9 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
9.2 fps ∼11% -7%
Wiko View Max
2.2 fps ∼3% -78%
Honor 7C
9.2 fps ∼11% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
9.8 fps ∼12% -1%
LG K11
5.3 fps ∼6% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps ∼100% +728%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17)
9.43 fps ∼12% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼20% +70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.4 fps ∼16%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
18 fps ∼31% +91%
Wiko View Max
4.5 fps ∼8% -52%
Honor 7C
18 fps ∼31% +91%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
10 fps ∼17% +6%
LG K11
11 fps ∼19% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps ∼100% +528%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17)
10.6 fps ∼18% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% +70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.5 fps ∼11%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
6 fps ∼10% -8%
Wiko View Max
1.3 fps ∼2% -80%
Honor 7C
6 fps ∼10% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.4 fps ∼11% -2%
LG K11
3.5 fps ∼6% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼100% +823%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17)
6.66 fps ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼24% +120%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.1 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13 fps ∼25% +113%
Wiko View Max
2.8 fps ∼5% -54%
Honor 7C
13 fps ∼25% +113%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.9 fps ∼13% +13%
LG K11
8.6 fps ∼16% +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps ∼100% +769%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17)
6.52 fps ∼12% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26% +128%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.5 fps ∼10%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3.4 fps ∼10% -3%
Wiko View Max
0.76 fps ∼2% -78%
Honor 7C
3.3 fps ∼9% -6%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.5 fps ∼10% 0%
LG K11
1.9 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps ∼100% +900%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16)
3.52 fps ∼10% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% +182%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.6 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
7 fps ∼23% +94%
Wiko View Max
1.3 fps ∼4% -64%
Honor 7C
7 fps ∼23% +94%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.8 fps ∼12% +6%
LG K11
4.3 fps ∼14% +19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps ∼100% +761%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16)
3.98 fps ∼13% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% +147%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko View Max Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7C Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17)
27.2 Points ∼74% +5%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
26.407 Points ∼72% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
25.787 Points ∼70%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
22.35 Points ∼61% -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
22.158 Points ∼60% -14%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
16.634 Points ∼45% -35%
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)
15.571 Points ∼42% -40%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼100% +184%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼41% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
4808 Points ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17)
4524 Points ∼33% -6%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
4456 Points ∼33% -7%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
3993 Points ∼29% -17%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
3470 Points ∼25% -28%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
3397 Points ∼25% -29%
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)
2781 Points ∼20% -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)
17558.2 ms * ∼100% -78%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
14149.5 ms * ∼81% -43%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
11571.8 ms * ∼66% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼65% -16%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
11370 ms * ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
9879.9 ms * ∼56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
9360.9 ms * ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17)
9289 ms * ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼13% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points ∼100% +126%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼45% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
109 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12)
90.5 Points ∼37% -17%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 6 ProHTC Desire 12 PlusWiko View MaxHonor 7CMotorola Moto G5s PlusLG K11Xiaomi Black SharkAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-36%
-30%
-28%
-34%
77%
-25%
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
60.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
58.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-13%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=318)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
82.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-12%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=318)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
72.6
9.16
-87%
11.87
-84%
10
-86%
44.89
-38%
13.16
-82%
114.1
57%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=77)
-73%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
66.87
65.67
-2%
31.65
-53%
30
-55%
37.94
-43%
45.8
-32%
127.2
90%
50.4 (11.4 - 149, n=77)
-25%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
212.87
135.55
-36%
96.95
-54%
115
-46%
75.7
-64%
48.32
-77%
199.6
-6%
165 (40 - 246, n=77)
-22%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
278.66
252.8
-9%
229.39
-18%
297
7%
237.44
-15%
252.96
-9%
741.5
166%
271 (115 - 704, n=77)
-3%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-17%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 40.4 °C37.7 °C37 °C 
 40.6 °C37.9 °C37.3 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C37.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C
37.7 °C38.6 °C39.2 °C
37.8 °C38.6 °C39.5 °C
37.8 °C38.3 °C39.1 °C
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.144.12537.636.93135.933.44028.1285028.625.66327.823.98029.824.510030.425.912522.220.116023.930.82002043.325019.44831517.253.240016.460.550016.562.363015.16480015.165100014.667.9125014.470.4160013.771.8200012.373.3250012.173315011.869.4400011.766.7500011.763.9630011.662.9800011.654.81000011.5651250011.5691600011.655.7SPL56.725.981.1N10.40.846.2median 14.4median 63.9Delta3.39.935.243.532.942.537.244.431.744.739.64428.337.227.336.426.936.726.731.22430.920.930.120.934.419.54118.549.117.555.917.561.415.767.515.87116.672.415.87115.472.715.571.41674.815.878.9168116.378.416.376.316.274.716.471.316.461.728.687.31.164.1median 16.4median 712.113.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 6 ProHonor 7C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 2.1 / 3.7 Watt
Carga midlight 4.5 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Wiko View Max
4000 mAh
Honor 7C
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
-66%
33%
28%
28%
6%
20%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.68
48%
2.8
-115%
0.6
54%
0.83
36%
0.57
56%
0.8
38%
0.981 (0.49 - 2.2, n=17)
25%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
32%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.05
2%
3.5
-67%
2.16
-3%
1.67
20%
1.48
30%
1.5
29%
1.985 (0.87 - 3.92, n=17)
5%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
18%
Idle Maximum *
3.7
2.12
43%
6.3
-70%
2.24
39%
1.85
50%
1.54
58%
2.3
38%
2.27 (0.9 - 4.03, n=17)
39%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
46%
Load Average *
4.5
3
33%
7
-56%
2.59
42%
3.47
23%
4.56
-1%
4.8
-7%
3.51 (1.69 - 6.2, n=17)
22%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
10%
Load Maximum *
6
4.57
24%
7.4
-23%
4.11
31%
5.41
10%
6.16
-3%
10.1
-68%
5.38 (3.8 - 7.2, n=17)
10%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 53min
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Wiko View Max
4000 mAh
Honor 7C
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-37%
22%
-20%
13%
-15%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1765
1496
-15%
1753
-1%
H.264
1214
747
-38%
WiFi v1.3
868
545
-37%
1056
22%
693
-20%
974
12%
741
-15%
711
-18%
Load
293
419
43%
253
-14%

Pro

+ Bandeja SIM tripla
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Painel IPS impecável
+ Armazenamento eMMC veloz
+ Desbloqueio facial rápido + leitor de digitais
+ Suficiente desempenho...

Contra

- ...mas SoC "antigo"
- Reprodução de cor do painel IPS
- Sem Tipo C
- Disponibilidade - versão chinesa
- Conectividade - versão chinesa
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro. Review unit courtesy of tradingshenzhen.com.
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro. Review unit courtesy of tradingshenzhen.com.

O Redmi 6 Pro é um smartphone bastante bem feito, pertencente à gama média de baixo preço. O lançamento do Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, no mínimo, introduzirá um novo concorrente sério para a competição local de smartphones na faixa de preço abaixo de 200 Euros (~$227).

O Redmi 6 Pro oferece muito por um preço baixo - no entanto, só podemos dar uma recomendação clara de compra na Alemanha para a versão Android One.

O smartphone Xiaomi tem uma boa tela IPS brilhante com ângulos de visão muito estáveis. Além disso, possui uma câmera atraente, armazenamento eMMC rápido, bateria de longa duração, uma bandeja tripla para dual SIM e recursos de desbloqueio biométrico que funcionam extremamente bem. Além disso, o desempenho do sistema, bem como a aparência externa e a sensação da superfície da carcaça, não revelam o fato de que este smartphone custa apenas 180 Euros (~$205).

No atento, a qualidade do alto-falante mono na parte inferior do dispositivo não foi muito convincente. A Xiaomi também poderia ter instalado um processador mais atualizado em seu modelo 2018. O uso local é dificultado pela baixa quantidade de bandas LTE suportadas na versão chinesa.

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro - 08/14/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
81%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
90%
Bateria
99%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 63 → 45%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
74%
Médio
73%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite)
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09-11)