Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8A – Bateria grande, preço pequeno

Super barato também em tamanho grande. Os smartphones Redmi são famosos por terem preços muito baixos e um alto nível de recursos. Você pode descobrir nesta análise se a receita também funciona com a mais recente adição à série, o Redmi 8A.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Redmi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
6.22 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, dedicado, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 156.5 x 75.4
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, phase detection AF (dual pixel), LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1.12µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB-C, SIM tool, 12 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, LED de notificações; SAR: 0.231 W/kg (head), 1.48 W/kg (body); LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mb/s), fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
119.90 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75 %7
12/2019
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
83 %6
08/2019
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
SD 439, Adreno 505
165 g16 GB eMMC Flash5.45"1440x720
73 %7
06/2019
Huawei Y5 2019
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
146 g16 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
75 %7
08/2019
Samsung Galaxy A10
Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
168 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
75 %7
10/2019
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
149.7 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Xiaomi Redmi 8A

Size comparison

156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g155.6 mm 73.06 mm 8.6 mm 149.7 g155.6 mm 75.6 mm 7.9 mm 168 g146.3 mm 70.4 mm 9.6 mm 165 g147.1 mm 70.8 mm 8.5 mm 146 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼100% +377%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68 (min: 52, max: 77) MBit/s ∼25% +21%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼24% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 52, max: 64) MBit/s ∼22% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56 (min: 54, max: 58) MBit/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 39, max: 60) MBit/s ∼20% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼100% +358%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼22% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.3 (min: 49, max: 60) MBit/s ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 (min: 25, max: 57) MBit/s ∼21% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼20% -8%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.6 (min: 36, max: 55) MBit/s ∼18% -16%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.7 (54-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.4 (49-60)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
26.7 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
58.1 ∆E
58.3 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
42 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
74.9 ∆E
66 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8A: 41.1 ∆E min: 12.02 - max: 74.87 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8A: 6.26 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 9.68 ∆E
Test chart – Perfect lighting
Test chart – Perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
392
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 441 cd/m² Médio: 421.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.42 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 441 cd/m²
Contraste: 1161:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.46 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.146
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Huawei Y5 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A10
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Screen
-18%
-11%
1%
9%
Brightness middle
441
533
21%
630
43%
451
2%
453
3%
Brightness
421
506
20%
593
41%
430
2%
440
5%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
88
-1%
90
1%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.6
-58%
0.66
-74%
0.22
42%
0.14
63%
Contrast
1161
888
-24%
955
-18%
2050
77%
3236
179%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.46
5.6
-26%
5.79
-30%
5.44
-22%
7.2
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.01
11.4
-42%
9.54
-19%
11.94
-49%
12.7
-59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
7.4
-37%
7
-30%
7.8
-44%
8.4
-56%
Gamma
2.146 103%
2.212 99%
2.176 101%
2.206 100%
1.95 113%
CCT
7901 82%
7974 82%
8420 77%
9149 71%
8296 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 595 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 595 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 595 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2505 Points ∼52%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1715 Points ∼35% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
2832 Points ∼58% +13%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2166 Points ∼45% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2505 - 3199, n=3)
2962 Points ∼61% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=351)
4852 Points ∼100% +94%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2987 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3068 Points ∼62% +3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2436 Points ∼49% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3590 Points ∼72% +20%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3369 Points ∼68% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2987 - 3267, n=4)
3141 Points ∼63% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=413)
4955 Points ∼100% +66%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
864 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
863 Points ∼57% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
839 Points ∼56% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1168 Points ∼77% +35%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
780 Points ∼52% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (863 - 903, n=4)
880 Points ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=413)
1510 Points ∼100% +75%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4708 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4594 Points ∼79% -2%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4195 Points ∼72% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
5136 Points ∼88% +9%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5237 Points ∼90% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4412 - 4791, n=6)
4632 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼100% +24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6026 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
5880 Points ∼85% -2%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5616 Points ∼81% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6823 Points ∼99% +13%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6922 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=6)
6095 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼92% +6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2135 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2134 Points ∼81% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1868 Points ∼71% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
2051 Points ∼78% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2118 - 2172, n=6)
2139 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=149)
2636 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
406 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
408 Points ∼14% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
210 Points ∼7% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
480 Points ∼16% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=6)
407 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=149)
2916 Points ∼100% +618%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
495 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
497 Points ∼19% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼10% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
578 Points ∼22% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=6)
496 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=149)
2626 Points ∼100% +431%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1627 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1595 Points ∼73% -2%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
940 Points ∼43% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1615 Points ∼74% -1%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1183 Points ∼54% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=6)
1597 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼100% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
418 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
419 Points ∼20% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼12% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
439 Points ∼21% +5%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
449 Points ∼22% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 432, n=6)
420 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼100% +396%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼26% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼16% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
524 Points ∼27% +5%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
521 Points ∼27% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 505, n=6)
500 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼100% +284%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1618 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1594 Points ∼76% -1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
924 Points ∼44% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1629 Points ∼78% +1%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1195 Points ∼57% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1618, n=6)
1588 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
725 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
730 Points ∼26% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
451 Points ∼16% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
646 Points ∼23% -11%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
740 Points ∼27% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 735, n=6)
727 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼100% +281%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
826 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
830 Points ∼36% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
509 Points ∼22% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
746 Points ∼32% -10%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
808 Points ∼35% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 835, n=6)
826 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼100% +181%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1657 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1610 Points ∼78% -3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
918 Points ∼45% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1682 Points ∼82% +2%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1130 Points ∼55% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1657, n=6)
1613 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼100% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
370 Points ∼21% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼11% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
444 Points ∼26% +20%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
392 Points ∼23% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (364 - 372, n=6)
369 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼100% +370%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼27% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
239 Points ∼14% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
531 Points ∼32% +19%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
459 Points ∼28% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (439 - 448, n=6)
445 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼100% +272%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1654 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1579 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
911 Points ∼47% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1674 Points ∼87% +1%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1139 Points ∼59% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1561 - 1654, n=6)
1593 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
719 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
724 Points ∼32% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
362 Points ∼16% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
582 Points ∼26% -19%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
645 Points ∼28% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 735, n=6)
720 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼100% +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
822 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
823 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
418 Points ∼21% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
681 Points ∼35% -17%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
714 Points ∼36% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 835, n=6)
820 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼100% +139%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12594 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12673 Points ∼83% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15004 Points ∼98% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11287 Points ∼74% -10%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
15069 Points ∼99% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (12096 - 12809, n=6)
12492 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼100% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13408 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13510 Points ∼52% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7514 Points ∼29% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11335 Points ∼44% -15%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11349 Points ∼44% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13385 - 13656, n=6)
13502 Points ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼100% +93%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13218 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13315 Points ∼65% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8452 Points ∼42% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11324 Points ∼56% -14%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11921 Points ∼59% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13151 - 13435, n=6)
13259 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼100% +54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
22 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
23 fps ∼52% +5%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼32% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼46% -9%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼43% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (22 - 23, n=6)
22.8 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼100% +100%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
34 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
35 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
21 fps ∼60% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
31 fps ∼89% -9%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼74% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (21 - 35, n=6)
32.2 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼87% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.7 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
19 fps ∼74% +96%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼25% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
10 fps ∼39% +3%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼37% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.7 - 19, n=6)
11.3 fps ∼44% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼100% +166%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
18 fps ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.9 fps ∼45% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼55% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼92% +11%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼73% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.3 - 19, n=6)
15.4 fps ∼71% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼100% +21%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼31% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼21% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6.5 fps ∼31% +2%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.1 fps ∼29% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)
6.43 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼100% +225%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼74% +8%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.8 fps ∼41% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
14 fps ∼74% +8%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼58% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6 - 14, n=6)
12.2 fps ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼100% +45%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.9 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4.1 fps ∼37% +5%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼25% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.8 fps ∼43% +23%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼38% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2 - 4.1, n=6)
3.63 fps ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼100% +187%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼15% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼10% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1.4 fps ∼17% +17%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼17% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)
1.2 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼100% +573%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.7 fps ∼40%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼26% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
7.9 fps ∼48% +18%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)
5.98 fps ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼100% +148%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.6 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.7 fps ∼19% +3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼12% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4 fps ∼21% +11%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼19% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)
3.65 fps ∼19% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼100% +436%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼25% 0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼14% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.1 fps ∼29% +17%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.5 fps ∼18% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)
3.53 fps ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼100% +300%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.1 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.3 fps ∼58% +3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.2 fps ∼26% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
8.7 fps ∼70% +23%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼34% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)
6.48 fps ∼52% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼100% +76%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
821 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1083 Points ∼97% +32%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
775 Points ∼70% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1113 Points ∼100% +36%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
835 Points ∼75% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (816 - 1083, n=6)
874 Points ∼79% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼73% -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
999 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1007 Points ∼41% +1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
471 Points ∼19% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
879 Points ∼36% -12%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
771 Points ∼32% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (995 - 1009, n=6)
1003 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼100% +143%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
758 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
655 Points ∼33% -14%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1421 Points ∼71% +87%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1991 Points ∼100% +163%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
782 Points ∼39% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=6)
1102 Points ∼55% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼91% +138%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2271 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2238 Points ∼66% -1%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1798 Points ∼53% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3164 Points ∼94% +39%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2211 Points ∼66% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=6)
2511 Points ∼74% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼100% +49%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1090 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1124 Points ∼66% +3%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
983 Points ∼57% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1576 Points ∼92% +45%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1027 Points ∼60% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1090 - 1312, n=6)
1236 Points ∼72% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼100% +57%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6969 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6969 - 16684, n=4)
12860 Points ∼24% +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=95)
54293 Points ∼100% +679%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
27672 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (27672 - 30734, n=4)
29440 Points ∼53% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 122714, n=94)
55473 Points ∼100% +100%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9258 Points ∼9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9258 - 10803, n=4)
10049 Points ∼10% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29020 - 224320, n=94)
100510 Points ∼100% +986%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
40746 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (40746 - 41690, n=4)
41220 Points ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=94)
104274 Points ∼100% +156%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
84645 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (84645 - 99193, n=4)
93569 Points ∼30% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼100% +272%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼100% +152%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
23.4 Points ∼58% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
16.911 Points ∼42% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)
16.4 Points ∼41% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
15.963 Points ∼40%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
15.682 Points ∼39% -2%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
13.85 Points ∼34% -13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=600)
46.3 Points ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
37.917 Points ∼82% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)
26.3 Points ∼57% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
26.139 Points ∼56% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
25.252 Points ∼55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=155)
43.1 runs/min ∼100% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chome 76)
20.7 runs/min ∼48% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chome 76)
18.45 runs/min ∼43% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)
18 runs/min ∼42% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
17.4 runs/min ∼40%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)
14.7 runs/min ∼34% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼100% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
45 Points ∼64% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)
35.2 Points ∼50% +10%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
35 Points ∼50% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
34 Points ∼49% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
32 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
27 Points ∼39% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
6921 Points ∼90% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)
4731 Points ∼62% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
4701 Points ∼61% +4%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
4603 Points ∼60% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
4512 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
4158 Points ∼54% -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77)
11272.6 ms * ∼100% -11%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
10364 ms * ∼92% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
10142.7 ms * ∼90% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
10126.5 ms * ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)
9963 ms * ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼88% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
5917.3 ms * ∼52% +42%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 8AXiaomi Redmi 7AHuawei Y5 2019Samsung Galaxy A10Motorola Moto E6 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
-16%
-3%
-2%
-14%
14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
63.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
62.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
51.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=162)
-16%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
78.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
82.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
70.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=162)
-17%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15.8
9.6
-39%
13.1
-17%
13.3
-16%
17.41
10%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=205)
16%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
109%
Random Read 4KB
73.1
57.8
-21%
62.1
-15%
73.4
0%
61.71
-16%
40.6 (3.59 - 117, n=205)
-44%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
106.4
68.7
-35%
45.2
-58%
101.7
-4%
106.09
0%
96.5 (14.8 - 189, n=205)
-9%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
282
258
-9%
272.1
-4%
296.4
5%
277.67
-2%
238 (25.8 - 452, n=205)
-16%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
17%
010203040Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø29.9 (1-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø30.1 (5-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø19.1 (9-29)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø27.8 (8-31)
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C30.1 °C29.7 °C 
 30.5 °C29.7 °C29.8 °C 
 30.4 °C29.3 °C29.1 °C 
Máximo: 31.5 °C
Médio: 30 °C
29.5 °C30.5 °C32 °C
30 °C30.1 °C30.5 °C
29.3 °C30.2 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043432536.837.83132.8324033.732.65040.135.36331.333.48024.724.710025.622.512522.125.716019.930.720019.337.625017.242.331517.449.540017.156.350017.361.36301564.38001566.5100018.671.4125014.575.5160015.773.1200014.473.8250014.474.9315014.172.1400014.267.5500014.365.3630014.568.4800014.571.31000014.572.81250014.571.21600014.754.1SPL67.562.464.460.727.583.7N2015.51612.9154.4median 15median 66.5Delta1.512.446.938.238.336.431.83034.135.14439.731.729.8252626.729.523.922.921.832.620.343.519.65018.855.317.560.720.16619.771.217.372.517.473.815.471.416.471.816.472.115.568.515.665.415.76516.169.91669.316.568.616.368.415.968.615.859702969.78225.31.223.752.9median 16.5median 68.428.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 8AXiaomi Redmi 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
1%
5%
24%
1%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
1.2
-33%
0.7
22%
0.57
37%
0.82 (0.57 - 1.28, n=6)
9%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
1%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.9
-6%
1.6
11%
1.69
6%
2.21 (1.6 - 4.5, n=6)
-23%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2.2
8%
2.4
-0%
2
17%
1.72
28%
2.49 (1.73 - 4.59, n=6)
-4%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
15%
Load Average *
4.3
3.9
9%
3.3
23%
5.4
-26%
3
30%
3.78 (2.57 - 5.71, n=6)
12%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
5%
Load Maximum *
6
5.4
10%
4.6
23%
6
-0%
4.88
19%
5.24 (4.12 - 6.99, n=6)
13%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 07min
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-36%
-29%
-28%
Reader / Idle
1903
1543
-19%
1256
-34%
1489
-22%
H.264
1193
902
-24%
732
-39%
802
-33%
WiFi v1.3
1145
853
-26%
709
-38%
753
-34%
825
-28%
Load
367
286
-22%
249
-32%
276
-25%

Pro

+ Muitos recursos
+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Função de carga rápida
+ Patches de segurança atualizados
+ Visual moderno
+ Bom alto falante
+ Boa câmera principal
+ Muito armazenamento

Contra

- Sem carregador rápido na caixa
- MIUI 11 somente tem Android 9
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante

Veredicto – Recomendável, mas não é perfeito

In review: Xiaomi Redmi 8A. Test device provided by:
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 8A. Test device provided by:
notebooksbilliger.de

O Redmi 8A novamente oferece muito pelo seu preço acessível: Bateria com duração muito, muito longa, um alto-falante decente, um chassi moderno e estável, patches de segurança atualizados e muito armazenamento. Certamente, você precisará de seu próprio adaptador de força para a função de carregamento rápido anunciado, e o truque para implantar o MIUI 11, mas ainda baseá-lo apenas no Android 9, é bastante audacioso.

As velocidades de localização e Wi-Fi estão no nível da classe, assim como o desempenho em si. Em relação à câmera, existem modelos muito piores por um preço semelhante, para que você possa puxar o gatilho da compra com tranquilidade aqui.

Um smartphone barato com uma ótima configuração: O Xiaomi Redmi 8A é uma recomendação obvia.

 

Por pouco menos de 120 euros (~US$ 133), dificilmente você pode obter mais pelo dinheiro no momento, mas o Redmi 7A é o dispositivo mais impressionante a um preço ainda mais baixo e com apenas uma pequena quantidade de deficiências. Mas aqueles que procuram uma tela maior, uma duração de bateria ainda mais longa e que preferem um design mais moderno, podem investir os quase 30 Euros (~US$ 33) do preço premium com a consciência limpa.

Xiaomi Redmi 8A - 12/03/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
72%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
38 / 70 → 55%
Peso
89%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 64 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
41 / 86 → 47%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
44%
Médio
69%
75%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 8A – Bateria grande, preço pequeno
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12-10 (Update: 2019-12-12)