Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5A

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/25/2018

Small all-rounder. Com o Redmi 5A, a Xiaomi oferece um smartphone Android compacto de baixo preço, adequado para aplicações simples e compradores conscientes dos preços. Revelamos o que os usuários podem esperar do pequeno smartphone de 5 polegadas de menos de 100 Euros ($116) em nossa análise.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Redmi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de movimento, sensor de proximidade, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (1/2/5/8), 4G TDD-LTE (38/40), 4G FDD-LTE (1/3/4/5/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 140.4 x 70.1
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED flash, [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Ferramenta SIM, carregador USB, cabo Micro USB, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (body): 1,234 W/kg, SAR value (head): 0,530 W/kg, fanless
peso
137 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=295)
200 MBit/s ∼100% +325%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼28% +18%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼28% +18%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼25% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼24%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼23% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=295)
195 MBit/s ∼100% +298%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼29% +14%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼28% +11%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼27% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s ∼25%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼24% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Redmi 5A text chart
Xiaomi Redmi 5A text chart (Detail)
534
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 537 cd/m² Médio: 498.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.75 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 503 cd/m²
Contraste: 689:1 (Preto: 0.73 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.451
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
33%
37%
7%
13%
Brightness middle
503
417
-17%
594
18%
527
5%
483
-4%
Brightness
499
395
-21%
570
14%
503
1%
460
-8%
Brightness Distribution
84
88
5%
86
2%
91
8%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.73
0.18
75%
0.22
70%
0.68
7%
0.4
45%
Contrast
689
2317
236%
2700
292%
775
12%
1208
75%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
6.46
-19%
6.63
-22%
5.3
3%
5.8
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.01
10.72
-7%
13.99
-40%
9.2
8%
12.6
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
5.8
15%
9.2
-35%
5.8
15%
5
26%
Gamma
2.451 90%
2.423 91%
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.6 85%
CCT
6590 99%
7839 83%
8663 75%
7894 82%
7709 84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8651 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points ∼50%
Honor 7A
46126 Points ∼62% +25%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼49% -2%
Nokia 2
24924 Points ∼34% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼53% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39106, n=11)
36649 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=381)
74371 Points ∼100% +102%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points ∼38%
Honor 7A
59990 Points ∼52% +37%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼40% +5%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼41% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=6)
42950 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=159)
114714 Points ∼100% +162%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3402 Points ∼76%
Honor 7A
3892 Points ∼87% +14%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼70% -7%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼51% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼81% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3629, n=10)
3285 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=243)
4492 Points ∼100% +32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points ∼89%
Honor 7A
5109 Points ∼100% +12%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼85% -5%
Nokia 2
3109 Points ∼61% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3681 - 4813, n=10)
4444 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=410)
4890 Points ∼96% +7%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points ∼100%
Honor 7A
705 Points ∼98% -2%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (616 - 802, n=10)
699 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=485)
689 Points ∼95% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points ∼27%
Honor 7A
739 Points ∼44% +66%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼11% -59%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼15% -43%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼26% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (433 - 447, n=10)
440 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=485)
1675 Points ∼100% +277%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points ∼63%
Honor 7A
1209 Points ∼100% +59%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼66% +5%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼19% -69%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼88% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (582 - 1372, n=10)
806 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=485)
1205 Points ∼100% +58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points ∼60%
Honor 7A
1962 Points ∼81% +34%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼54% -10%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼37% -38%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼43% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=10)
1303 Points ∼54% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=485)
2435 Points ∼100% +66%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points ∼64%
Honor 7A
1055 Points ∼87% +36%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼17% -73%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼12% -81%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼61% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (371 - 891, n=10)
719 Points ∼59% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=489)
1217 Points ∼100% +57%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points ∼30%
Honor 7A
2127 Points ∼49% +60%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼33% +9%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼32% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=8)
1329 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=182)
4383 Points ∼100% +229%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points ∼44%
Honor 7A
2820 Points ∼67% +50%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼44% -1%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼26% -40%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼46% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=10)
1768 Points ∼42% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=232)
4239 Points ∼100% +126%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points ∼54%
Honor 7A
675 Points ∼54% -1%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼53% -2%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼34% -38%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼55% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=10)
659 Points ∼53% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=233)
1252 Points ∼100% +84%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
903 Points ∼60%
Honor 7A
1259 Points ∼83% +39%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼35% -41%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼36% -40%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼60% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=10)
859 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=371)
1517 Points ∼100% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43 Points ∼3%
Honor 7A
535 Points ∼34% +1144%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼9% +226%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼8% +179%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼3% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=10)
45.1 Points ∼3% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=371)
1592 Points ∼100% +3602%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
55 Points ∼4%
Honor 7A
613 Points ∼45% +1015%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼12% +205%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼9% +118%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼5% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=10)
57.2 Points ∼4% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=379)
1354 Points ∼100% +2362%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points ∼83%
Honor 7A
9249 Points ∼73% -12%
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼56% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼82% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 10556, n=10)
9408 Points ∼74% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=525)
12683 Points ∼100% +20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points ∼32%
Honor 7A
9684 Points ∼55% +75%
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼24% -25%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼31% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5547, n=10)
5195 Points ∼30% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=525)
17522 Points ∼100% +217%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points ∼42%
Honor 7A
9584 Points ∼65% +55%
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼31% -26%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼41% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6186, n=10)
5709 Points ∼39% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=526)
14738 Points ∼100% +138%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps ∼25%
Honor 7A
16 fps ∼53% +108%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼20% -22%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼18% -30%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=10)
7.26 fps ∼24% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=549)
30.3 fps ∼100% +294%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps ∼52%
Honor 7A
27 fps ∼100% +93%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼36% -31%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼36% -31%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=10)
12.8 fps ∼47% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=552)
24.5 fps ∼91% +75%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
2.8 fps ∼17%
Honor 7A
7.1 fps ∼44% +154%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼17% -4%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼10% -43%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼17% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=10)
2.64 fps ∼16% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=471)
16.2 fps ∼100% +479%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6 fps ∼38%
Honor 7A
14 fps ∼90% +133%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼35% -10%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼28% -27%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼38% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=10)
5.61 fps ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=474)
15.6 fps ∼100% +160%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 88869, n=408)
254 Points ∼100% +1317%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼7% +3%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.394 Points ∼7% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.927 Points ∼7%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼7% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.7, n=9)
17.8 Points ∼7% -1%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼5% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=543)
5443 Points ∼100% +69%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼62% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points ∼59%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼59% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2582 - 3289, n=10)
2998 Points ∼55% -7%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼47% -20%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼36% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼100% -47%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼84% -23%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼82% -20%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼76% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112.2 ms * ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=10)
12893 ms * ∼67% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=562)
11598 ms * ∼60% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 5AHonor 7A Umidigi A1 ProNokia 2Huawei Y6 2018Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-8%
-22%
2%
-36%
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
37 (6.38 - 65.4, n=109)
-41%
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
55.7 (10.8 - 87.7, n=109)
-34%
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
9.28
9.4
1%
10.2
10%
8.1
-13%
9
-3%
7.32 (0.49 - 37.9, n=223)
-21%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=594)
66%
Random Read 4KB
42.32
39.2
-7%
29.6
-30%
17.44
-59%
38.8
-8%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=223)
-53%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=594)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
49.86
72.5
45%
44.4
-11%
50.77
2%
65.6
32%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=223)
-17%
78.2 (2.99 - 246, n=594)
57%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.76
254.8
-13%
269.2
-8%
131.15
-55%
254.3
-13%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=223)
-47%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=594)
-23%
Carga Máxima
 42.5 °C39 °C39.4 °C 
 41.7 °C39.1 °C40.3 °C 
 40.6 °C38.9 °C40.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C
37.4 °C40.2 °C39.9 °C
37.4 °C39.9 °C39.7 °C
37.5 °C39.1 °C39.5 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 39 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202727.82525.927.63129.532.24031.428.75032.634.26324.123.28023.122.710024.123.112517.21916016.623.620016.833.225016.438.731514.147.540013.85750013.662.763012.163.380011.564.2100011.566.9125011.265.5160011.263.5200011.264.7250011.265315011.166.2400011.266.1500011.266.7630011.465.2800011.466.81000011.360.81250011.450.31600011.441.8SPL6023.977.1N13.70.539.7median 11.4median 63.3Delta1.811.542.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 5AHonor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 2.9 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-54%
12%
-62%
-38%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.3
-8%
1.8
-50%
0.55
54%
1.7
-42%
1.245 (0.54 - 4.02, n=11)
-4%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=629)
26%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.6
-7%
2.3
-53%
1.02
32%
2.5
-67%
2.43 (1.2 - 6, n=11)
-62%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=628)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.9
-61%
3.2
-78%
1.09
39%
3.2
-78%
2.79 (1.62 - 6.64, n=11)
-55%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=629)
-11%
Load Average *
2.9
3.7
-28%
4.7
-62%
4.48
-54%
5.2
-79%
4.44 (2.9 - 9.6, n=11)
-53%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=623)
-39%
Load Maximum *
4.8
6.4
-33%
6
-25%
5.32
-11%
6.8
-42%
5.58 (4.3 - 7.34, n=11)
-16%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=623)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 49min
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1009
657
-35%
608
-40%
840
-17%
643
-36%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Dual SIM e armazenamento expansível
+ Emissor de IV

Contra

- Tela com uma relação de contraste pobre
- Sem USB Type-C
- SO desatualizado
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 5A. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Xiaomi Redmi 5A. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

O Xiaomi Redmi 5A é um dispositivo compacto com uma relação preço-desempenho imbatível. No entanto, ele só pode ser recomendado para aqueles que não precisam de muito poder e que irão usá-lo principalmente para tirar fotos ocasionais ou enviar mensagens via WhatsApp. Dito isto, o Redmi 5A fornece desempenho suficiente para o bom funcionamento do sistema operacional (Android 7.1).

Além das vantagens que o smartphone compacto oferece, existem também algumas desvantagens que acompanham o Redmi 5A. A relação de contraste e o valor de preto da tela são dificilmente toleráveis e os reflexos fazem com que a leitura do conteúdo da tela seja difícil em exteriores.

O Xiaomi Redmi 5A é um smartphone sólido que é muito fácil de manusear. Com seu preço de menos de 100 euros ($116), oferece a melhor relação preço-desempenho nesta faixa de preço.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A - 07/16/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 86%
Mouse
79%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
93%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 96%
Camera
63%
Médio
71%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-25 (Update: 2018-08- 1)