Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Q8 (i9-8950HK, GTX 1070, QHD)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/03/2018

Core i9 gamer. A Eurocom está pulando o i7-8750H e indo direto para a jugular com o mais potente i9-8950HK. O desempenho é indubitavelmente mais rápido do que o Core i7-7700HQ de última geração, mas alguns comportamentos de afogamento repetitivo estão obstaculizando o sistema.

Eurocom Q8
Processador
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 16384 MB, Análises do: 1480 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 389.27, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-21300, 1333.3 MHz, 15-17-17-35, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, AUO1096, 120 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 headphone, 1 microphone, 1 SPDIF, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC,Mini-SD,MMC,RSMMC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.9 x 418 x 287
Bateria
66 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP FHD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Control Center 2.0, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.99 kg, Suprimento de energia: 897 g
Preço
3000 USD

 

Size Comparison

Right: 3.5 mm earphone, microphone, SPIDIF, SDXC reader, 2x USB 3.1, RJ-45
Right: 3.5 mm earphone, microphone, SPIDIF, SDXC reader, 2x USB 3.1, RJ-45
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.1
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.1
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
183 MB/s ∼93%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182.9 MB/s ∼93% 0%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.06 MB/s ∼41% -56%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X7 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s ∼100% +18%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.24 MB/s ∼86% +2%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s ∼85%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.33 MB/s ∼35% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼95%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
605 MBit/s ∼89% -7%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
485 MBit/s ∼71% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Aorus X7 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
498 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
486 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
332.7
cd/m²
369.9
cd/m²
353.3
cd/m²
340.9
cd/m²
367.9
cd/m²
372.3
cd/m²
320.1
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
342.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 372.3 cd/m² Médio: 346 cd/m² Minimum: 36.54 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 367.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 669:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.86 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.43
ΔE Greyscale 12.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
80.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 52.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
Eurocom Q8
AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
MSI GS73VR 7RG
ID: CMN1747, Name: Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus GL703GE-ES73
Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Aorus X7 v7
AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Response Times
-1%
24%
-192%
-41%
11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
21.6 (12.4, 9.2)
23.6 (13.6, 10)
-9%
11.6 (6, 5.6)
46%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
-70%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-39%
24 (14, 10)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (6.8, 2.2)
8.4 (6, 2.4)
7%
8.8 (6, 2.8)
2%
37.2 (21.6, 15.6)
-313%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-42%
6 (4, 2)
33%
PWM Frequency
26040 (10)
26040 (25)
Screen
20%
36%
32%
16%
15%
Brightness middle
367.9
350.9
-5%
331.1
-10%
367.4
0%
402.3
9%
375
2%
Brightness
346
311
-10%
312
-10%
363
5%
372
8%
353
2%
Brightness Distribution
84
79
-6%
86
2%
86
2%
86
2%
85
1%
Black Level *
0.55
0.33
40%
0.31
44%
0.32
42%
0.62
-13%
0.58
-5%
Contrast
669
1063
59%
1068
60%
1148
72%
649
-3%
647
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.86
7.7
22%
2.86
71%
3.8
61%
5.6
43%
6.06
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.56
14.4
18%
6.35
64%
10.4
41%
9.8
44%
10.54
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.43
2.66
40%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.4
11.1
10%
4.3
65%
3.5
72%
4.7
62%
5.68
54%
Gamma
2.09 115%
2.11 114%
2.268 106%
2.18 110%
2.14 112%
2.3 104%
CCT
11064 59%
11813 55%
7034 92%
6467 101%
7519 86%
7998 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
52.5
77.74
48%
75
43%
58.1
11%
53.7
2%
57
9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
80.5
100
24%
100
24%
89.3
11%
82.2
2%
87
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 17%
30% / 34%
-80% / -6%
-13% / 6%
13% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10647 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
202 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-8950HK
  (185 - 206, n=5)
200 Points ∼97% -1%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼93% -5%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
178 Points ∼86% -12%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼83% -16%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼78% -21%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼76% -23%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼74% -25%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼70% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼68% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼48% +28%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼46% +24%
Average Intel Core i9-8950HK
  (1099 - 1391, n=5)
1314 Points ∼45% +20%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1099 Points ∼37%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
1050 Points ∼36% -4%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼30% -20%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
864 Points ∼29% -21%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼26% -30%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼25% -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
666 Points ∼23% -39%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
202 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1099 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
159.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
6620 Points ∼85% +5%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6331 Points ∼82%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5689 Points ∼73% -10%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5290 Points ∼68% -16%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4891 Points ∼63% -23%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4752 Points ∼61% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
4345 (min: 4330, max: 4370) Points ∼56% -31%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
5225 Points ∼86% +2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼86% +2%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5111 Points ∼84%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5101 Points ∼84% 0%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼83% -1%
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
4394 Points ∼72% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼69% -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
3819 (min: 3816, max: 3827) Points ∼63% -25%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5111 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Q8
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GS73VR 7RG
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Aorus X7 v7
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
AS SSD
-52%
-36%
-44%
-7%
Copy Game MB/s
958.2
381.49
-60%
724.2
-24%
573.6
-40%
757.87
-21%
Copy Program MB/s
406.67
229.75
-44%
228.28
-44%
446.13
10%
327.18
-20%
Copy ISO MB/s
1596.18
423.47
-73%
1192.69
-25%
1227.03
-23%
1504.3
-6%
Score Total
3840
1064
-72%
1951
-49%
2072
-46%
3668
-4%
Score Write
1579
417
-74%
406
-74%
858
-46%
1021
-35%
Score Read
1515
421
-72%
1056
-30%
831
-45%
1803
19%
Access Time Write *
0.035
0.032
9%
0.034
3%
0.123
-251%
0.031
11%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.051
-19%
0.06
-40%
0.042
2%
0.059
-37%
4K-64 Write
1284.54
273.64
-79%
267.19
-79%
671.01
-48%
790.72
-38%
4K-64 Read
1231.67
337.66
-73%
871.42
-29%
620.48
-50%
1485.33
21%
4K Write
107.92
96.85
-10%
109.9
2%
113.36
5%
123.31
14%
4K Read
35.57
33.69
-5%
38.31
8%
35.61
0%
48.35
36%
Seq Write
1869.29
465.12
-75%
291.75
-84%
734.8
-61%
1066.75
-43%
Seq Read
2480.96
497.89
-80%
1463.62
-41%
1752.03
-29%
2690
8%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Sequential Read: 2480.96MB/s
Sequential Write: 1869.29MB/s
4K Read: 35.57MB/s
4K Write: 107.92MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1231.67MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1284.54MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.043ms
Access Time Write: 0.035ms
Copy ISO: 1596.18MB/s
Copy Program: 406.67MB/s
Copy Game: 958.2MB/s
Score Read: 1515Points
Score Write: 1579Points
Score Total: 3840Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
13928 Points ∼79% +14%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
12215 Points ∼70%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
11482 Points ∼65% -6%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10351 Points ∼59% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (7137 - 12471, n=52)
9505 Points ∼54% -22%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼47% -32%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
8215 Points ∼47% -33%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7607 Points ∼43% -38%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
26912 Points ∼53% +26%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
23990 Points ∼47% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (13760 - 25604, n=52)
22408 Points ∼44% +5%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
21286 Points ∼42%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18363 Points ∼36% -14%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
15101 Points ∼30% -29%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -41%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7790 Points ∼15% -63%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
20909 Points ∼51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=50)
17245 Points ∼42%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
16685 Points ∼41%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14694 Points ∼36%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
11968 Points ∼29%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
6216 Points ∼15%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
124077 Points ∼67%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
105079 Points ∼57%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
104764 Points ∼57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (64973 - 125922, n=45)
97935 Points ∼53%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
82006 Points ∼44%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
64343 Points ∼35%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
39896 Points ∼22%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
390417 Points ∼53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (116033 - 368933, n=25)
222639 Points ∼31%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
172623 Points ∼24%
3DMark 11 Performance
18243 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 384.1316.2291.1154.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 48.2fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Barulho

Ocioso
28.2 / 31.8 / 36.3 dB
Carga
46.7 / 49.7 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
MSI GS73VR 7RG
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP
Noise
2%
7%
-7%
-6%
4%
off / environment *
28
28.6
-2%
28.1
-0%
28.2
-1%
30
-7%
28
-0%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
28.6
-1%
29.5
-5%
35.6
-26%
33
-17%
29.4
-4%
Idle Average *
31.8
28.6
10%
29.6
7%
35.6
-12%
36
-13%
30.7
3%
Idle Maximum *
36.3
31.1
14%
29.6
18%
35.7
2%
41
-13%
34
6%
Load Average *
46.7
42.2
10%
31.6
32%
50.2
-7%
41
12%
42
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.9
53.8
-15%
46
2%
50.2
-7%
45
4%
45.8
2%
Load Maximum *
49.7
50
-1%
51.8
-4%
50.2
-1%
52
-5%
45.8
8%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C38.2 °C33 °C 
 41.2 °C43.4 °C32.6 °C 
 30.8 °C26.8 °C26.4 °C 
Máximo: 43.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
34.4 °C41.4 °C44 °C
30.4 °C40 °C42.6 °C
28.6 °C41.4 °C33.6 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.841.62538.337.13132.934.44034.635.35033.533.96332.435.38032.633.310031.23212529.832.616030.241.520028.846.525027.749.731527.451.740027.355.750026.758.363026.366.680026.462.8100026.160125026.862.9160028.263.1200027.759.6250027.759315026.156.3400024.461.7500023.759.6630023.552.9800023.350.81000023.347.11250023.145.9160002342.8SPL38.372.4N3.129.5median 26.7Eurocom Q8median 55.7Delta1.76.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Q8 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.38 / 1.05 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 26.3 / 29 / 32.3 Watt
Carga midlight 82.4 / 170.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
35%
-33%
-20%
8%
Idle Minimum *
26.3
10.6
60%
37.5
-43%
27
-3%
18.88
28%
Idle Average *
29
16
45%
37.6
-30%
33
-14%
24.36
16%
Idle Maximum *
32.3
16.4
49%
37.6
-16%
40
-24%
32.27
-0%
Load Average *
82.4
75.9
8%
122.4
-49%
107
-30%
107.74
-31%
Load Maximum *
170.2
163.8
4%
277.4
-63%
259
-52%
160.28
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
192
111.2
42%
180.3
6%
190
1%
142
26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 33min
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
MSI GS73VR 7RG
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Aorus X7 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 55 Wh
Battery Runtime
25%
174%
18%
18%
7%
Reader / Idle
349
721
276
221
237
WiFi v1.3
153
191
25%
419
174%
181
18%
180
18%
164
7%
Load
57
72
69
81
70

Pro

+ Temperaturas do núcleo relativamente frias
+ Comutador gráfico Optimus
+ Design fino; base forte
+ Diversas opções de tela
+ SO limpo; sem bloatware
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ 3 baias de armazenamento
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Comportamento de afogamento; desempenho da CPU poderia ser melhor
- Rigidez da tampa abaixo da média no seu centro
- Relativamente barulhento durante os jogos
- Duração da bateria pouco impressionante
- Retro iluminação RGB do teclado
- Sem G-Sync
In review: Eurocom Q8. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Q8. Test model provided by Eurocom

O Eurocom Q8 custa a partir de $2.300 USD pelo i9-8950HK e GPU GTX 1070. Para os jogos, a 8ª geração Coffee Lake-H da Intel oferece apenas aumentos marginais nas taxas de quadros em relação às opções da 7ª geração do Kaby Lake. Os usuários podem potencialmente economizar dinheiro considerando portáteis mais antigos com o Core i7-7700HQ e GTX 1070 e ainda obtêm quase o mesmo desempenho do Eurocom Q8 quando jogam.

O estranho comportamento de afogamento do Q8 durante jogos, faz com que seja difícil recomendar o sistema por enquanto. É possível que isso afete apenas nossa unidade de teste específica. Mesmo assim, o Core i9 não está rodando em seu potencial máximo aqui, e mesmo que pudesse, suas pequenas vantagens de jogo em relação ao menos caro i7-8750H ou mesmo i7-7700HQ não refletem o preço pedido muito maior.

O Eurocom Q8 deixa uma boa primeira impressão no que diz respeito à capacidade de manutenção e conectividade. O desempenho é instável e com um desempenho por dólar mais baixo do que uma oferta tradicional do Core i7.

Eurocom Q8 - 07/03/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
82%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
68 / 81 → 84%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 83%
Bateria
66%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
78%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Impressão
-1%
Médio
71%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Q8 (i9-8950HK, GTX 1070, QHD)
Allen Ngo, 2018-07- 3 (Update: 2018-07-10)