Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X9C (i7-8700K, GTX 1080 SLI, Clevo P870TM1-G)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/18/2018

12 libras de potencia pura. Terminamos o ano com o portátil de jogos de consumo mais poderoso atualmente disponível. Sua CPU Core i7-8700K, GPUs GTX 1080 SLI, tela 4K UHD, armazenamento NVMe RAID 0 de 1 TB e 64 GB de RAM DDR4 são especificações astronômicas, independentemente do formato.

Eurocom Sky X9C (Sky Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8700K
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1657 MHz, Memoría: 10010 MHz, GDDR5X, 388.31
Memória
65536 MB 
, 1333.3 MHz (overclock até 1497,4 MHz), 16-18-18-39, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, Secundário: 4 TB Western Digital WD40NMZW-11GX651
Placa de Som
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 7.1 out, headphone out, microphone in, S/PDIF and Line-in port, Card Reader: SDXC reader
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 47.2 x 428 x 308
Bateria
89 Wh, 5700 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes FOSTER (2W) + Subwoofer (2,5W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Control Center, FlexiKey, GPU Overclock, CPU Overclock, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
5.56 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.77 kg
Preço
7500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 3.0, card reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, 2x Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.0, card reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, 2x Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, Kensington Lock
Rear: HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, AC power
Rear: HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0, AC power
Left side: 2x Gigabit RJ-45, 3x USB 3.0, 4x audio
Left side: 2x Gigabit RJ-45, 3x USB 3.0, 4x audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X9C
 
191.05 MB/s ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
 
162.5 MB/s ∼85% -15%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
 
83 MB/s ∼43% -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition
 
256.7 MB/s ∼100% +23%
Eurocom Sky X9C
 
207.93 MB/s ∼81%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
 
88 MB/s ∼34% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
668 MBit/s ∼95%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
594 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
317.1
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
316.3
cd/m²
331.2
cd/m²
347.7
cd/m²
319.8
cd/m²
315.2
cd/m²
317.3
cd/m²
303.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 347.7 cd/m² Médio: 323.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 869:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Eurocom Sky X9C
ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Schenker XMG U727 2017
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), AHVA, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
44%
75%
22%
-36%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.6 (24, 19.6)
30 (18.8, 11.2)
31%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
73%
38 (13, 25)
13%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-39%
44 (14, 30)
-1%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
12.8 (10.8, 2)
56%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
76%
20 (4, 16)
31%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-33%
28 (6, 22)
3%
PWM Frequency
25000 (15)
204.9 (20)
Screen
-8%
23%
9%
3%
20%
Brightness middle
347.7
402.3
16%
274
-21%
306
-12%
230
-34%
362
4%
Brightness
324
372
15%
262
-19%
299
-8%
207
-36%
344
6%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
87
0%
91
5%
83
-5%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.62
-55%
0.26
35%
0.27
32%
0.2
50%
0.35
12%
Contrast
869
649
-25%
1054
21%
1133
30%
1150
32%
1034
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.39
5.6
12%
1.36
79%
3.98
38%
5.62
12%
2.46
62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.69
9.8
-1%
4.1
58%
7.29
25%
10.24
-6%
4.26
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.7
13%
0.64
88%
4.15
23%
4.54
16%
2.9
46%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.14 103%
2.19 100%
2.45 90%
2.36 93%
2.31 95%
CCT
6271 104%
7519 86%
6551 99%
7386 88%
6625 98%
6120 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.8
53.7
-39%
77
-12%
58
-34%
88
0%
88
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
82.2
-18%
100
0%
89
-11%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 0%
49% / 32%
16% / 11%
-17% / -4%
11% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
199 Points ∼91% +5%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼87% 0%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼87%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼80% -8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼73% -16%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼73% -16%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼71% -19%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points ∼68% -22%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼66% -24%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼66% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼32% +6%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
1405 (min: 1375.04, max: 1405.28) Points ∼32% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼30%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼20% -33%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼20% -34%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points ∼19% -37%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼17% -45%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
724 Points ∼17% -46%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼15% -49%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
519 Points ∼12% -61%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.27 Points ∼93% +2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼91%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼90% -2%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points ∼81% -12%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.77 Points ∼73% -21%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼70% -23%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼69% -25%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.67 Points ∼68% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points ∼68% -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +5%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.64 Points ∼58% +4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼55%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% -35%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points ∼34% -39%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼32% -43%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.94 Points ∼29% -47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.49 Points ∼28% -50%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.14 Points ∼26% -52%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.76 Points ∼21% -62%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼69%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
7413 Points ∼68% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
6501 Points ∼60% -12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points ∼59% -13%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5550 Points ∼51% -25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points ∼51% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5521 Points ∼51% -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -42%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
39624 Points ∼80% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -26%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -28%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points ∼48% -40%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21755 Points ∼44% -45%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
20943 Points ∼42% -47%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points ∼41% -48%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
16329 Points ∼33% -59%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
402.56 s * ∼5% -245%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.117 s * ∼3% -82%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% -77%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% -51%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
118.6 s * ∼1% -2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.591 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -50%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
565.334 Seconds * ∼3% -25%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
529.418 Seconds * ∼2% -17%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
509.5 Seconds * ∼2% -12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% -7%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
452.938 Seconds * ∼2%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
442.8 Seconds * ∼2% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15780
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
39382
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7423
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
90.81 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.23 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.75 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1334 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8786 Points ∼88%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
7166 Points ∼72% -18%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5819 Points ∼59% -34%
Productivity
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8657 Points ∼89%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
7460 Points ∼77% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
6481 Points ∼67% -25%
Essentials
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9775 Points ∼92%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
8396 Points ∼79% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
7724 Points ∼72% -21%
Score
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points ∼84%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5489 Points ∼71% -15%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4752 Points ∼61% -27%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6515 Points ∼100% +28%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5487 Points ∼84% +8%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5159 Points ∼79% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5095 Points ∼78%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points ∼74% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9529 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8593 Points ∼90% -10%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5364 Points ∼56% -44%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5476 Points ∼90% +9%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
5159 Points ∼85% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points ∼82%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points ∼75% -9%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼69% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5005 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
9529 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5095 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Sky X9C
2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
Write 4K
165
155.1
96.08
174.1
Read 4K
55.87
44.22
38.91
48.07
Write Seq
2612
311.2
467.9
1444
Read Seq
3377
1247
494.2
1008
Write 4K Q32T1
548.3
310.3
188.9
512
Read 4K Q32T1
624.7
551.2
205.9
632
Write Seq Q32T1
2944
311.5
461.2
1522
Read Seq Q32T1
3407
1560
450.8
3111
No HDD benchmark entry found!
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
9770 Points ∼97%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
8894 Points ∼88% -9%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
6722 Points ∼66% -31%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
4841 Points ∼48% -50%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4048 Points ∼40% -59%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2522 Points ∼25% -74%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
9374 Points ∼76%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
8279 Points ∼68% -12%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
7871 Points ∼64% -16%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
7321 Points ∼60% -22%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
7176 Points ∼59% -23%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
6946 Points ∼57% -26%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
6651 Points ∼54% -29%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
5639 Points ∼46% -40%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
5090 Points ∼42% -46%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4260 Points ∼35% -55%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
40636 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
40582 Points ∼100%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
34226 Points ∼84% -16%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
32640 Points ∼80% -20%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
28366 Points ∼70% -30%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21366 Points ∼53% -47%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
20268 Points ∼50% -50%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
19121 Points ∼47% -53%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% -55%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11049 Points ∼27% -73%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14119 Points ∼78%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11623 Points ∼64% -18%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
11599 Points ∼64% -18%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
11584 Points ∼64% -18%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
10313 Points ∼57% -27%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
9929 Points ∼55% -30%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
9878 Points ∼54% -30%
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
9755 Points ∼54% -31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼49% -37%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8830 Points ∼49% -37%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ
50923 Points ∼100% +9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
46773 Points ∼92%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
42691 Points ∼84% -9%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
41469 Points ∼81% -11%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 4790K
38959 Points ∼76% -17%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
29443 Points ∼58% -37%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
29109 Points ∼57% -38%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% -50%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
21901 Points ∼43% -53%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
13668 Points ∼27% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
30042 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
192638 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45068 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26751 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
17060 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
87.4 fps ∼100%
Asus GX800VH Prototype
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 6820HK
78.4 fps ∼90% -10%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
74 (min: 66, max: 88) fps ∼85% -15%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
70.9 (min: 63, max: 78) fps ∼81% -19%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
68.4 (min: 61, max: 75) fps ∼78% -22%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
53 fps ∼61% -39%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
46.5 (min: 41, max: 52) fps ∼53% -47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
43.6 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
22.9 (min: 20) fps ∼26% -74%
Destiny 2 - 3840x2160 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
80.3 fps ∼100%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
58.1 fps ∼72% -28%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
51.5 (99th percentile: 22.8) fps ∼64% -36%
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
55 fps ∼100%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
51 (min: 22, max: 171) fps ∼93% -7%
Desktop PC Ryzen 7 1800X + Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Desktop), 1800X
45 (min: 3, max: 99) fps ∼82% -18%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
34 (min: 21, max: 50) fps ∼62% -38%
Ashes of the Singularity - 3840x2160 crazy
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
58.4 fps ∼100% +25%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
46.7 fps ∼80%
Mafia 3 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
36.7 (min: 34, max: 40) fps ∼100% +10%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
33.4 fps ∼91%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
27.8 (min: 24, max: 32) fps ∼76% -17%
baixo média alto ultra4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 150.384.377.8fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 398.4347.3295.5265.6fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 196194.8192.8172.1fps
Thief (2014) 150.1147.5144.5141.9fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 357229.8184.3106.487.1fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 2021861509957fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6060606060fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 212.9219.5174.5167.6100fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 122.8110.699.8103.587.4fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 109.8105.9100.646.7fps
Overwatch (2016) 300300300300216.3fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 134.411579.933.4fps
Prey (2017) 14414414414384fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 360.8245.7122.582.654.9fps
F1 2017 (2017) 23717815210956fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 981231069255fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 148.4121.9116.2113.180.3fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960Tooltip
The Witcher 3 4K

Barulho

Ocioso
34.2 / 39.6 / 39.6 dB
Carga
48.5 / 56.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 7920HQ, 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Noise
4%
-3%
8%
-3%
7%
off / environment *
28.4
28.2
1%
31
-9%
28.9
-2%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
34.2
35.6
-4%
35
-2%
28.9
15%
35
-2%
30
12%
Idle Average *
39.6
35.6
10%
38
4%
30.6
23%
37
7%
31
22%
Idle Maximum *
39.6
35.7
10%
41
-4%
35.7
10%
43
-9%
33
17%
Load Average *
48.5
50.2
-4%
52
-7%
49
-1%
49
-1%
43
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
50.2
7%
53
2%
56
-4%
55
-2%
Load Maximum *
56.5
50.2
11%
59
-4%
55
3%
60
-6%
58
-3%

* ... smaller is better

 27.8 °C44.6 °C36.8 °C 
 25.2 °C32 °C27.4 °C 
 22.6 °C32 °C27.4 °C 
Máximo: 44.6 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
39 °C48 °C34.2 °C
40.2 °C44.4 °C26.8 °C
33.6 °C29.6 °C21.8 °C
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-9.7 °C / -17.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.135.22533.333.93131.633.24030.732.45030.630.96328.729.98028.332.810027.64412526.452.716027.756.72002854.425029.856.231530.258.94002864.350031.468.363031.768.580026.168.9100026.269.1125024.865.5160025.264.5200028.164.1250027.363.231502561400021.365500020.962.7630020.558800020.651.31000020.744.21250020.739.21600020.533.6SPL38.276.7N339.4median 26.2median 61Delta2.16.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Sky X9CApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Eurocom Sky X9C audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.13 / 7.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 54.7 / 55.7 / 56.8 Watt
Carga midlight 183.7 / 321.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
7920HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 2x Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 18.4
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
4980HQ, GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0), Wide View, Super PLS, 1920x1080, 18.4
Power Consumption
34%
-9%
28%
19%
Idle Minimum *
54.7
37.5
31%
45
18%
29
47%
34.3
37%
Idle Average *
55.7
37.6
32%
54
3%
35
37%
41.9
25%
Idle Maximum *
56.8
37.6
34%
62
-9%
42
26%
49.3
13%
Load Average *
183.7
122.4
33%
178
3%
140
24%
140.2
24%
Load Maximum *
321.8
277.4
14%
586
-82%
334
-4%
328.6
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
454.8
180.3
60%
380
16%
295
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
1h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
1h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 47min
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
MSI GT83VR 7RF-206 Titan SLI
7920HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 75.24 Wh
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Eurocom Sky X7E2
6700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 89 Wh
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
137%
51%
78%
58%
17%
Reader / Idle
83
276
233%
146
76%
174
110%
137
65%
103
24%
WiFi v1.3
78
181
132%
118
51%
134
72%
104
33%
90
15%
Load
47
69
47%
59
26%
71
51%
83
77%
53
13%

Pro

+ O desempenho de CPU mais rápido em seu segmento de mercado; conector LGA 1151 de desktop
+ Temperaturas da superfície confortáveis sob uso intenso
+ 5 baias de armazenamento; PCIe x4 NVMe e opções RAID
+ Velocidades de CPU e GPU consistentes
+ Adaptador de CA frio
+ Alto-falantes fortes com graves decentes
+ Acessibilidade relativamente simples
+ Amplas opções de personalização
+ CPU e GPU desbloqueadas
+ Qualidade de construção sólida

Contra

- Comportamento estranho do consumo de energia quando sob cargas extremas
- Altas temperaturas da CPU sob uso intenso
- Ventoinhas sempre ativas; muito barulhentas ao jogar
- Duração muito curta da bateria, não removível
- Sem portas de áudio ESS Sabre DAC douradas
- Desempenho SLI deficiente nos últimos títulos
- Difícil acesso às baias de armazenamento
- Temperaturas altas da GPU durante os jogos
- Bleeding moderado da iluminação de fundo
- Os controles manuais da ventoinha poderiam ser melhores
- O adaptador de CA requer resfriamento ativo
- A tela mate é um pouco granulada
- Sem teclas RGB individualmente iluminadas
- Baixo overhead de overclocking
In review: Eurocom Sky X9C. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Sky X9C. Test model provided by Eurocom

Deixamos nossa opinião sobre SLI bem clara no passado. Para fins de jogo, o SLI sempre foi um saco misto. O advento do DX12, em particular, tornou o SLI ainda mais difícil de recomendar, uma vez que a API agora relega a otimização multi-GPU às mãos dos desenvolvedores individuais, em vez da Nvidia. O suporte confiável do SLI está se tornando muito irregular como resultado, e os números mornos de benchmark reforçam essa noção. Os usuários que desejam o SLI em um portátil devem ter motivos muito específicos para possuir a tecnologia porque a GPU extra pode ser pior do que um pisa papeis em muitos casos.

Com isso fora do caminho, o Eurocom Sky X9C superou rapidamente a maioria dos benchmarks em nosso banco de dados devido à sua configuração extrema e Core i7-8700K. Seus componentes modulares e ampla gama de recursos de hardware suportados continuam a ser o destaque de possuir um Eurocom sobre alternativas de fabricantes mais conhecidos.

As mesmas desvantagens permanecem como e quase todos os portáteis Eurocom que testamos. O perfil de desempenho muito denso comporta alto ruído do ventilador (54 dB (A)), temperaturas do núcleo muito quentes (> 85 C), peso pesado (5,6 kg) e uma duração reduzida da bateria que também pode ser medida em minutos. Enquanto o peso e as durações não são grandes fatores para os portáteis de jogo, as temperaturas quentes do núcleo limitam significativamente o potencial de overclocking e o ruído alto é tão inimigo quanto qualquer obstáculo na tela durante os jogos. Não podemos deixar de nos perguntar como este sistema poderia ter se desempenhado removendo o SLI e duplicando o número de tubos de calor, tanto para a CPU quanto para a GPU. Estamos dispostos a apostar que as temperaturas mais baixas resultantes, os ventiladores mais silenciosos, as velocidades mais altas do Boost e o potencial de overclocking mais amplo levariam a um melhor desempenho nos jogos, mesmo que os índices de benchmark sintéticos sejam menores do que os da configuração SLI.

Alguns aspectos do chassi e do software parecem presos no passado. A falta de teclas RGB iluminadas individualmente é cada vez mais difícil de perdoar e o marco plástico interno da tela ainda se sente barato em comparação com um design Alienware. O Centro de Controle e os utilitários de overclocking estão mais focados na criação de uma GUI "Fisher-Price" atraente com tamanhos de fonte grandes em vez de uma interface limpa com opções facilmente acessíveis que não estão enterradas em várias janelas. Os recursos que são realmente mais úteis para os jogadores, como gravação de dados, gravação de vídeo, ajustes/leituras diretas de RPM para cada ventoinha, e sobreposições de desempenho ainda estão faltando no software pré-instalado.

Para a melhor experiência geral de jogos, os usuários estarão melhor configurando o Sky X9C com uma única GTX 1080 e depois fazendo o overclocking a partir daí. Mais jogadores conscientes do orçamento podem obter essencialmente o mesmo desempenho de jogos de um processador menos exigente de classe HQ de 45 W, já que a maioria dos títulos não está vinculada pela CPU. Certifique-se de ter um bom par de fones de ouvido quando jogar!

Eurocom Sky X9C - 12/29/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
71 / 81 → 88%
Peso
31 / 10-66 → 37%
Bateria
49%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
98%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 92%
Ruído
52 / 90 → 57%
Audio
90%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Médio
73%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X9C (i7-8700K, GTX 1080 SLI, Clevo P870TM1-G)
Allen Ngo, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2018-02- 1)